DOCSLIB.ORG

724 Act 2006-103 LAWS of PENNSYLVANIA No. 2006-103 A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
724 Act 2006-103 LAWS of PENNSYLVANIA No. 2006-103 A 724 Act 2006-103 LAWS OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 2006-103 A SUPPLEMENT SB 874 To the act of December 8, 1982 (P.L.848, No.235), entitled “An act providingfor the adoption of capital projects related to the repair, rehabilitation or replacement of highway bridges to be financed from current revenue or by the incurring of debt and capital projects related to highway and safety improvement projects to be financed from current revenue of the Motor License Fund,” itemizing additional local and State bridge projects. The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby enacts as follows: Section 1. Short title. This act shall be known and may be cited as the Highway-Railroad and Highway Bridge Capital Budget Supplemental Act for 2005-2006. Section 2. Definitions. The following words and phrases when used in this act shall have the meanings given to them in this section unless the context clearly indicates otherwise: “Account.” The Highway Bridge Improvement Restricted Account within the Motor License Fund. “Capital project.” A capital project as defined in section 302 of the act of February 9, 1999 (P.L.l, No.1), known as the Capital Facilities Debt Enabling Act, and shall include a county or municipal bridge rehabilitation, replacementor improvement project as set forth in this act. “Department.” The Department of Transportation of the Commonwealth. “Secretary.” The Secretary of Transportation.ofthe Commonwealth. Section 3. Total authorization for bridge projects. (a) Total projects.—The total authorization for the costs of the projects itemized pursuant to this act and to be financed from current revenue or by the incurring of debt shall be $2,103,688,000. (b) State projects.—The authorization for capital projects in the category of highway bridge projects and forestry and State park bridge projects to be constructed by the Department of Transportation, its successors or assigns and to be financed by the incurring of debt or from the account itemized in this act under the category of State bridges shall be $1,612,945,000. (c) Non-State projects.—The authorization for non-State highway bridge projects to be constructed by municipalities and to be financed in part with grants not exceeding 80% of the non-Federal share of the costs made to the local government municipalities by the department from revenues deposited in the account itemized in this act under the category of local bridges shall be $490,743,000. SESSION OF 2006 Act 2006-103 725 Section 4. Itemization of bridge projects. The individual capital projects in the category of highway projects to be constructed by the Department of Transportation, its successors or assigns and to be financed from current revenue or by the incurring of debt are hereby itemized, together with their estimated financial costs, in the following sections. Section 5. Adams County. (a) Local Bridges (1) Hamilton and Paradise Townships, T-55l over Beaver Creek, Bridge Replacement 290,000 (2) Hamilton and Paradise Townships, T-552A over Beaver Creek, Bridge Replacement 270,000 (3) Hamilton and Paradise Townships, 1-554 over Beaver Creek, Bridge Replacement 295,000 (b) State Bridges (1) SR 0034, Carlisle Road over Quaker Run, Menallen Township, Bridge Replacement 205,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $100,000) (Land Allocation - $15,000) (Design and Contingencies - $90,000) (2) SR 2006, Coleman Road over CSX Railroad, Straban Township, Bridge Replacement 225,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $120,000) (Land Allocation - $15,000) (Design and Contingencies - $90,000) (3) SR 4010, Shippensburg Road over Conewago Creek, Franklin and Menallen Townships, Bridge Replacement 205,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $100,000) (Land Allocation - $15,000) (Design and Contingencies - $90,000) (4) SR 1007 over Mud Run, Reading Township, Bridge Replacement 215,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $135,000) (LandAllocation - $40,000) (Design and Contingencies - $40,000) (5) SR 1015 over Conewago Creek, Straban Township, Bridge Replacement 250,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $156,000) (Land Allocation - $47,000) (Design and Contingencies - $47,000) (6) SR 1017 over Conewago Creek, Straban Township, Bridge Replacement 459,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $287,000) (Land Allocation - $86,000) 726 Act 2006-103 LAWS OF PENNSYLVANIA (Design and Contingencies - $86,000) (7) SR 2006 over Plum Creek, Conewago Township, Bridge Replacement 144,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $90,000) (Land Allocation - $27,000) (Design and Contingencies - $27,000) (8) SR 2014 over Piney Creek, Germany Township, Bridge Replacement 106,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $66,000) (Land Allocation - $20,000) (Design and Contingencies - $20,000) (9) SR 3005 over Willoughby Run, Cumberland Township, Bridge Replacement 157,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $99,000) (Land Allocation - $29,000) (Design and Contingencies - $29,000) (10) SR 3006 over Tributary of Marsh Creek, Cumberland Township, Bridge Replacement 49,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $31,000) (Land Allocation - $9,000) (Design and Contingencies - $9,000) (11) SR 3018 over Little Marsh Creek, Hamiltonban Township, Bridge Replacement 38,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $24,000) (Land Allocation - $7,000) (Design and Contingencies - $7,000) (12) SR 3030 over Conewago Creek, Franklin Township, Bridge Replacement 141,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $87,000) (Land Allocation - $27,000) (Design and Contingencies - $27,000) (13) SR 4013 over Conewago Creek, Butler Township, Bridge Replacement 121,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $75,000) (Land Allocation - $23,000) (Design and Contingencies - $23,000) Section 6. Allegheny County. (a) Local Bridges (1) South Park Township, Wallace Road Bridge over Catfish Run near Brownsville Road, Bridge Replacement 120,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $120,000) (2) Findlay Township, Steubenville-Enlow Road over Montour Run, Bridge Replacement 819,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $819,000) SESSION OF 2006 Act 2006-103 727 (3) South Park Township, Wood Street over Piney Fork Creek, Bridge Replacement 298,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $298,000) (4) Moon Township, Spring Run Road over Boggs Run, Bridge Replacement 390,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $390,000) (5) South Park Township, B. Corrigan Drive at Horse Barn in Park over Catfish Run, Bridge Replacement 250,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $250,000) (6) South Fayette Township, Parks Run Road over Millers Run, Bridge Replacement 480,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $480,000) (7) South Fayette Township, 2000 Feet North of SR 3001 over Miller Run Road/Fishing Run Road, Bridge Replacement 650,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $650,000) (8) Collier Township, Scotts Run Road over Scotts Run, Bridge Replacement 350,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $350,000) (9) Collier Township, Thoms Run Road over Woods Run, Bridge Replacement 650,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $650,000) (10) Edgeworth Borough, Woodland Road Extension over CSX Railroad, Bridge Replacement 4,664,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $4,664,000) (11) Edgeworth Borough, Woodland Road Extension over Little Sewickley Creek, Bridge Replacement 424,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $424,000) (12) Bethel Park Borough, Bethel Park N&W Railroad over Railroad, Bridge Replacement 3,982,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $3,982,000) (13) Sewickley Hills Borough, Glenfield Road over Tributary of Kilbuck Run, Bridge Replacement 519,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $519,000) (14) South Park Township, Brownsville Road over Lick Run, Bridge Replacement 310,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $310,000) (15) Findlay Township, Clinton-Enlow Road over North Branch of Montour Run, Bridge Replacement 204,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $204,000) 728 Act 2006-103 LAWS OF PENNSYLVANIA (16) Sewickley Hills Borough, Pony Hollow Road over Tributary of Little Sewickley Creek, Bridge Replacement 519,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $519,000) (17) Sewickley Heights Borough, Pony Hollow Road over Tributary of Little Sewickley Creek, Bridge Replacement 410,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $410,000) (18) Osborne Borough, Beaver Street over Davis Run, Bridge Replacement 350,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $350,000) (19) North Fayette Township, Main Street over Robinson Run, Bridge Replacement 859,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $859,000) (20) Jefferson Hills, Cochran Mills Road over N&W Railroad, Bridge Replacement 4,979,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $4,979,000) (21) Kilbuck Township, Camp Home Road over Tributary ofLowries Run, Bridge Replacement 281,000 (Base Construction Allocation -$281,000) (22) North Fayette Township, Hans Road overNorth Branch of Robinson Run, Bridge Replacement 327,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $327,000) (23) South Fayette Township, 100 Feet West of SR 3026 over Miller Run Road/Dolphin Road, Bridge Replacement 186,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $186,000) (24) Ross Township, Hillcrest Drive over Hillcrest Drive, Bridge Rehabilitation 36,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $30,000) (Land Allocation - $6,000) (25) South Park Township, McElheny Road over Lick Run, Bridge Replacement 30,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $30,000) (26) South Park Township, Wallace Road over Lick Run, Bridge Replacement 30,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $30,000) (27) South Park Township, Brandis Avenue at Stewart Road over Tributary of Piney Fork Creek, Bridge Replacement 25,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $25,000) (28) Bethel Park Borough, Brookside Boulevard over
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5
    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying the Distinct Rock Types in the Streambed of Muddy Run
    The JUNIATA JOURNAL of GEOLOGY, 1, 1-7 (2014) Original Article Identifying the Distinct Rock Types in the Streambed of Muddy Run Kristin N. Kopera Pennsylvania has many secondary and bedrock streams, and one such stream is Muddy Run. Muddy Run is located primarily in the Hamilton Formation, but also touches the Onondaga and Ridgeley Formations in Huntingdon County, Pennsylvania. This paper identifies the rock types that are currently in Muddy Run, and matches them to the local geologic formations. Instead of primarily finding Hamilton Group in the stream, the majority of the samples taken from Muddy Run were from the Tuscarora and Ridgeley Formations. This suggests that Muddy Run had, at one time, come in contact with the Tuscarora formation. This data could also suggest that Muddy Run once belonged to a larger stream that transported the Tuscarora sandstones and deposited them in Muddy Run’s current location. Keywords. — Bedrock Stream; Onondaga Formation; Ridgeley Formation; Meandering River; Tuscarora Formation Department of Geology, Juniata College, 1700 Moore Street, Huntingdon, PA 16652. Email: [email protected] INTRODUCTION Huntingdon County, Pennsylvania, is one such example. Bedrock streams, instead of just Rivers and streams are the main transporters of flowing over the ground, cut down into the local sediment and rock and they are known for their bedrock (Seidl & Dietrich 1993). This following powerful erosional capabilities. Sediment and paper will answer two questions concerning rock travel down gradient from location to Muddy Run. Firstly, throughout its geologic location until they come to rest in a delta history, from what locations has Muddy Run .Alternatively, the sediment could also be been eroding and transporting rock? In addition, deposited when the velocity of the water has where did the rocks in Muddy Run once belong become too slow to move the debris any farther.
    [Show full text]
  • Sewickley Creek Watershed Conservation Plan
    Sewickley Creek Watershed Conservation Plan August 2003 SewickleySewickley CreekCreek WatershedWatershed ConservationConservation PlanPlan SewickleySewickley CreekCreek WatershedWatershed ConservationConservation PlanPlan SewickleySewickley CreekCreek WatershedWatershed ConservationConservation PlanPlan SewickleySewickley CreekCreek WatershedWatershed ConservationConservation PlanPlan The Pennsylvania Rivers Conservation Program Sewickley Creek Watershed Conservation Plan August 2003 Prepared for: Prepared by: Sewickley Creek Watershed Association Watershed Assistance Center P.O. Box 323 246 South Walnut Street Youngwood, PA 15697 Blairsville, PA 15717 724-925-3621 724-459-0953 www.sewickleycreek.com www.paconserve.org Funding provided in part by: Pennsylvania Department of Conservation & Natural Resources Bureau of Recreation & Conservation Keystone Recreation, Park & Conservation Fund Sewickley Creek Watershed Conservation Plan Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page i Table of Contents ii Acknowledgments vi Executive Summary viii Project Background viii Purpose viii Planning Process ix Implementation ix Management Recommendations x Chapter Summaries xi Project Area xii Land Resources xiii Water Resources xiv Biological Resources xv Cultural Resources xvi Acronyms xvii List of Tables xx List of Figures xxii Watershed Definition xxiii Project Area Characteristics 1-1 Location 1-1 Size 1-1 Climate 1-1 Topography 1-1 Major Tributaries 1-2 Socio-Economic Profile 1-2 Land Use 1-2 Land Use Regulation 1-4 Demographics and Population
    [Show full text]
  • Jjjn'iwi'li Jmliipii Ill ^ANGLER
    JJJn'IWi'li jMlIipii ill ^ANGLER/ Ran a Looks A Bulltrog SEPTEMBER 1936 7 OFFICIAL STATE September, 1936 PUBLICATION ^ANGLER Vol.5 No. 9 C'^IP-^ '" . : - ==«rs> PUBLISHED MONTHLY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA by the BOARD OF FISH COMMISSIONERS PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF FISH COMMISSIONERS HI Five cents a copy — 50 cents a year OLIVER M. DEIBLER Commissioner of Fisheries C. R. BULLER 1 1 f Chief Fish Culturist, Bellefonte ALEX P. SWEIGART, Editor 111 South Office Bldg., Harrisburg, Pa. MEMBERS OF BOARD OLIVER M. DEIBLER, Chairman Greensburg iii MILTON L. PEEK Devon NOTE CHARLES A. FRENCH Subscriptions to the PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER Elwood City should be addressed to the Editor. Submit fee either HARRY E. WEBER by check or money order payable to the Common­ Philipsburg wealth of Pennsylvania. Stamps not acceptable. SAMUEL J. TRUSCOTT Individuals sending cash do so at their own risk. Dalton DAN R. SCHNABEL 111 Johnstown EDGAR W. NICHOLSON PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER welcomes contribu­ Philadelphia tions and photos of catches from its readers. Pro­ KENNETH A. REID per credit will be given to contributors. Connellsville All contributors returned if accompanied by first H. R. STACKHOUSE class postage. Secretary to Board =*KT> IMPORTANT—The Editor should be notified immediately of change in subscriber's address Please give both old and new addresses Permission to reprint will be granted provided proper credit notice is given Vol. 5 No. 9 SEPTEMBER, 1936 *ANGLER7 WHAT IS BEING DONE ABOUT STREAM POLLUTION By GROVER C. LADNER Deputy Attorney General and President, Pennsylvania Federation of Sportsmen PORTSMEN need not be told that stream pollution is a long uphill fight.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Listing of Highway Projects with Federal Funding Obligated For
    Annual Listing of Projects with Federal Funding Obligated for Fiscal Year 2018 Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission Two Chatham Center, Suite 500 112 Washington Place, Pittsburgh PA 15219 Phone (412) 391-4490 Fax (412) 391-9160 www.spcregion.org List of Abbreviations and Definitions FAST ACT Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act FHWA Federal Highway Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization MPMS Multi-modal Project Management System One Map PennDOT Public Mapping Application PennDOT Pennsylvania Departmnet of Transportation SPC Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission TIP Transportation Improvement Program Project Funding Codes ARC Appalachian Regional Commission BOF Bridge - Off System BOO, BON Federal Bridge Funds CAQ Congestion Mitigation and Air Wuality FAP Slide Emergency HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program NHPP National Highway Performance Program RRX Surface Transportation - RRX Elimination of Crossing Special Project SFX Special Project - Federal Earmark STP Surface Transportation - Any Area in State STU Surface Transportation - Urban TAP Transportation Alternatives Program Project Phase Abbreviations CON Construction FD Final Design Preliminary PE Engineering Right of ROW Way UTL Utilities 1 Annual Listing of Federally Obligated Highway Projects October 1, 2017 to September 30, 2018 Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission Annual Listing of Projects with Federal Funding Obligated for Federal Fiscal Year 2018 On December 4th, 2015, President Obama signed into law the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) which allocates federal funding for surface transportation programs over fiscal years 2016 through 2020. Per 23 U.S.C. § 134(j)(7)(B) of FAST Act, states and Metropolitan Planning Organizations (such as the SPC) must publish annual lists of projects where federal funds were obligated.
    [Show full text]
  • (TMDL) Assessment for the Neshaminy Creek Watershed in Southeast Pennsylvania Table of Contents
    Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Assessment for the Neshaminy Creek Watershed in Southeast Pennsylvania Table of Contents Page A1.0 OVERVIEW………………………………………………………………………… 1 A2.0 HYDROLOGIC /WATER QUALITY MODELING………………………………. 8 A2.1 Data Compilation and Model Overview………………………………………… 8 A2.2 GIS-Based Derivation of Input Data……………………………………………. 10 A2.3 Watershed Model Calibration…………………………………………………… 10 A2.4 Relationship Between Dissolved Oxygen Levels, Nutrient Loads and Organic Enrichment…………………………………………………………….. 16 B. POINT SOURCE TMDLs FOR THE ENTIRE NESHAMINY CREEK WATERSHED (Executive Summary)……….……….………………………. 18 B1.0 INTRODUCTION.…………………………………………………………………. 19 B2.0 EVALUATION OF POINT SOURCE LOADS……………………………………. 20 B3.0 REACH BY REACH ASSESSMENT……………………………………………… 27 B3.1 Cooks Run (482A)………………………………………………………………. 27 B3.2 Little Neshaminy Creek (980629-1342-GLW)………………..………………… 27 B3.3 Mill Creek (20010417-1342-GLW)…………………………………………….. 29 B3.4 Neshaminy Creek (467)………………………………………….……………… 30 B3.5 Neshaminy Creek (980515-1347-GLW)..…………………….………….……… 32 B3.6 Neshaminy Creek (980609-1259-GLW)………………………..………………. 32 B3.7 Park Creek (980622-1146-GLW)………………………………..……………… 34 B3.8 Park Creek (980622-1147-GLW)……………………………..………………… 35 B3.9 West Branch Neshaminy Creek (492)……………………………..……………. 35 B3.10 West Branch Neshaminy Creek (980202-1043-GLW)…………..……………. 36 B3.11 West Branch Neshaminy Creek (980205-1330-GLW)………………………… 37 B3.12 West Branch Neshaminy Creek (980205-1333-GLW)………………………… 38 C. LITTLE NESHAMINY CREEK……………………………………………………… 40 D. LAKE GALENA……………………………………………………………………… 58 E. PINE RUN…………………………………………………………………………….. 78 i Table of Contents (cont.) Page F. SUB-BASIN #1 OF WEST BRANCH NESHAMINY CREEK……………………… 94 G. SUB-BASIN #2 OF WEST BRANCH NESHAMINY CREEK……………………… 107 H. SUB-BASIN #3 OF WEST BRANCH NESHAMINY CREEK…………………….. 121 I. SUB-BASIN #4 OF WEST BRANCH NESHAMINY CREEK……………………… 138 J. COOKS RUN………………………………………………………………………….. 155 K.
    [Show full text]
  • Prepared by the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission
    Prepared by the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission BUCKS COUNTY FLOOD RECOVERY AND MITIGATION STRATEGY Prepared for the U.S. Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration Prepared by the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission This Economic Adjustment Strategy was accomplished by staff of the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission through Economic Development Administration Adjustment Strategy Grant No. 01-09-58005. The statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and other data in this report are solely those of the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Economic Development Administration. The background flood map is used in part solely for state affairs only. courtesy FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION SEPTEMBER 1998 DELAWARE VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION Publication Abstract TITLE Date Published: September 1998 Bucks County Flood Recovery and Mitigation Strategy Publication No. 98032 Geographic Area Covered: Bucks County Key Words: Floods, Flooding, Floodplain, Flood Prone, Flood Proofing, Regulations, Impervious Coverage, Watersheds, Sub-Basin 2, Emergency Management, Neshaminy Creek, Buck Creek, Brock Creek, National Flood Insurance Program, Levee, Dam, Floodwall, Acquisition, Relocation, Army Corps of Engineers, Delaware River Basin Commission ABSTRACT This report provides a flood recovery and mitigation strategy for those flood prone communities in Bucks County. As an element of a flood mitigation plan for eastern Pennsylvania, which
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Streamflow Statistics for Streamgage Locations in and Near Pennsylvania
    Prepared in cooperation with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Selected Streamflow Statistics for Streamgage Locations in and near Pennsylvania Open-File Report 2011–1070 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Tunkhannock Creek and Highway 6 overpass downstream from U.S. Geological Survey streamgage 01534000 Tunkhannock Creek near Tunkhannock, PA. (Photo by Andrew Reif, USGS) Selected Streamflow Statistics for Streamgage Locations in and near Pennsylvania By Marla H. Stuckey and Mark A. Roland Prepared in cooperation with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Open-File Report 2011–1070 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2011 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Stuckey, M.H., and Roland, M.A., 2011, Selected streamflow statistics for streamgage locations in and near Pennsyl- vania: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Butler County Natural Heritage Inventory, 1991
    BUTLER COUNTY NATURAL HERITAGE INVENTORY Lisa L. Smith, Natural Heritage Ecologist Charles W. Bier, Associate Director, Natural Science and Stewardship Department Paul G. Wiegman, Director, Natural Science and Stewardship Department Chris J. Boget, Data Manager Bernice K. Beck, Data Handler Western Pennsylvania Conservancy 316 Fourth Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222 July 1991 BUTLER COUNTY NATURAL HERITAGE INVENTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 4 COUNTY OVERVIEW 9 PENNSYLVANIA NATURAL DIVERSITY INVENTORY 14 NATURAL HERITAGE INVENTORY METHODS 15 RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 17 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 133 LITERATURE CITED 134 APPENDICES I. Federal and State Endangered Species Categories, Global and State Element Ranks 135 II. County Significance Ranks 141 III. Potential Natural Heritage Inventory Form 142 IV. Recommended Natural Heritage Field Survey Form 143 V. Classification of Natural Communities in Pennsylvania (Draft) 144 LIST OF TABLES PAGE 1. Summary of sites in order of relative county significance 20 2. Important managed areas protecting biotic resources in Butler County 24 3. Butler County municipality summaries 27 Tables summarizing USGS quadrangles Baden 116 Barkeyville 37 Butler 103 Chicora 93 Curtisville 125 East Butler 90 Eau Claire 41 Emlenton 44 Evans City 108 Freeport 128 Grove City 34 Harlansburg 75 Hilliards 51 Mars 119 Mount Chestnut 86 Parker 48 Portersville 77 Prospect 81 Saxonburg 100 Slippery Rock 63 Valencia 122 West Sunbury 57 Worthington 97 Zelienople 113 LIST OF FIGURES PAGE 1. USGS quadrangle map index of Butler County 25 2. Municipalities of Butler County 26 3 INTRODUCTION Butler County possesses a wealth of natural resources including its flora, fauna, and natural habitats such as forests, wetlands, and streams.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware River Basin Commission § 430.13
    Delaware River Basin Commission § 430.13 drilling. Such notice shall be in writing (2) A written report prepared by a and shall specify the location of pro- hydrogeologist describing the expected posed new facility, the anticipated rate effects of the proposed withdrawal on of withdrawal, and the general purpose existing wells, flows of perennial of the proposed water use. The notice streams and the long-term lowering of shall also state the location of existing ground water levels. wells within the radius set forth in (3) A log showing the nature of sub- § 430.21(a). surface material encountered during (b) Whenever the Executive Director the construction and installation of shall deem necessary, or upon request the exploratory or production well(s). of a party proposing a new or expanded (4) The detailed results of extended withdrawal of ground water, an infor- pump tests, of not less than 48 hours mal conference may be scheduled to re- duration, and records of observations view the nature of the proposed with- during such pump tests from represent- drawal, the applicability of the Com- ative monitoring wells. mission’s standards relating to ground (b) Applications for a protected area water, and the requirements of a pro- permits whose daily average with- tected area permit under this regula- drawal during any calendar month is in tion. excess of 10,000 gallons shall be accom- panied by an application fee of $100. § 430.13 Protected area permits for new withdrawals. Government agencies shall be exempt from such application fee. Any
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Upper Southampton Township Comprehensive Plan Update Final Plan
    2010 Upper Southampton Township Comprehensive Plan Update Final Plan Prepared for: The Township of Upper Southampton Bucks County, PA Prepared by: Upper Southampton Township Planning Commission Pennoni Associates, Inc. Economic Development Associates Date of Adoption: November 3, 2010 Administration Building, 939 Street Road, Southampton, PA 18966-4787, Ph. (215) 322-9700 www.southamptonpa.com 2010 Comprehensive Plan Update Upper Southampton Board of Supervisors Lola G. Biuckians, Chair Marguerite C. Genesio, Vice-chair Walter C. Stevens, Secretary/Treasurer Stephen Wallin, Asst. Secretary/Treasurer Keith E. Froggatt, Member Joseph W. Golden, Township Manager Upper Southampton Comprehensive Plan Committee (Planning Commission) Stanley Gawel, Chair Franz Kautz, Vice-chair Lisa Deubel, Secretary (former member) David Faust, member David George, member Ray Grossmuller, member Lou Ann Hingley, member Stephen Stadler, member Nancy Triscoli, Recording Secretary (Special thanks to the many public participants for their valuable comments and input) Professional Planning Assistance Provided by Pennoni Associates Inc. 3001 Market Street, Second Floor Drexel Plaza Philadelphia, PA 19104 P: 215-222-3000 – F: 215-222-0598 www.pennoni.com This document was prepared with financial assistance from the Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development through a Land Use Planning and Technical Assistance Program (LUPTAP) Grant. 2010 Upper Southampton Comprehensive Plan Update TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapters Description Pages Chapter 1 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Northumberland County
    NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY START BRIDGE SD MILES PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT TYPE TITLE DESCRIPTION COST PERIOD COUNT COUNT IMPROVED Bridge replacement on Township Road 480 over Mahanoy Creek in West Cameron BASE Bridge Replacement Township Road 480 over Mahanoy Creek Township 3 $ 2,120,000 1 1 0 Bridge Replacement on State Route 1025 (Shakespeare Road) over Chillisquaque BASE Bridge Replacement State Route 1025 over Chillisquaque Creek Creek in East Chillisquaque Township, Northumberland County 1 $ 1,200,000 1 1 0 BASE Bridge Replacement State Route 4022 over Boile Run Bridge replacement on State Route 4022 over Boile Run in Lower Augusta Township 1 $ 195,000 1 0 0 Bridge replacement on State Route 2001 over Little Roaring Creek in Rush BASE Bridge Replacement State Route 2001 over Little Roaring Creek Township 1 $ 180,000 1 1 0 Bridge replacement on PA 405 over Norfolk Southern Railroad in West BASE Bridge Replacement PA 405 over Norfolk Southern Railroad Chillisquaque Township 1 $ 2,829,000 1 1 0 BASE Bridge Rehabilitation PA 61 over Shamokin Creek Bridge rehabilitation on PA 61 over Shamokin Creek in Coal Township 1 $ 850,000 1 0 0 Bridge rehabilitation on PA 45 over Chillisquaque Creek in East Chillisquaque & BASE Bridge Rehabilitation PA 45 over Chillisquaque Creek West Chillisquaque Townships 2 $ 1,700,000 1 0 0 Bridge replacement on State Route 2022 over Tributary to Shamokin Creek in BASE Bridge Replacement State Route 2022 over Tributary to Shamokin Creek Shamokin Township 3 $ 240,000 1 0 0 BASE Bridge Replacement Township Road 631 over
    [Show full text]