DOCSLIB.ORG

2010 Upper Southampton Township Comprehensive Plan Update Final Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2010 Upper Southampton Township Comprehensive Plan Update Final Plan Prepared for: The Township of Upper Southampton Bucks County, PA Prepared by: Upper Southampton Township Planning Commission Pennoni Associates, Inc. Economic Development Associates Date of Adoption: November 3, 2010 Administration Building, 939 Street Road, Southampton, PA 18966-4787, Ph. (215) 322-9700 www.southamptonpa.com 2010 Comprehensive Plan Update Upper Southampton Board of Supervisors Lola G. Biuckians, Chair Marguerite C. Genesio, Vice-chair Walter C. Stevens, Secretary/Treasurer Stephen Wallin, Asst. Secretary/Treasurer Keith E. Froggatt, Member Joseph W. Golden, Township Manager Upper Southampton Comprehensive Plan Committee (Planning Commission) Stanley Gawel, Chair Franz Kautz, Vice-chair Lisa Deubel, Secretary (former member) David Faust, member David George, member Ray Grossmuller, member Lou Ann Hingley, member Stephen Stadler, member Nancy Triscoli, Recording Secretary (Special thanks to the many public participants for their valuable comments and input) Professional Planning Assistance Provided by Pennoni Associates Inc. 3001 Market Street, Second Floor Drexel Plaza Philadelphia, PA 19104 P: 215-222-3000 – F: 215-222-0598 www.pennoni.com This document was prepared with financial assistance from the Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development through a Land Use Planning and Technical Assistance Program (LUPTAP) Grant. 2010 Upper Southampton Comprehensive Plan Update TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapters Description Pages Chapter 1 Introduction & Purpose 1-1 to 1-5 • Background • Planning Process • Structure of the Plan • PA Municipalities Planning Code Compliance Chapter 2 Guiding Goals and Objectives 2-1 to 2-8 • Vision for the Future • 1998 Plan’s Goals, Objectives, Policies • 2010 Plan’s Overall Goals and Objectives • Summary Chapter 3 Existing Land Use & Zoning 3-1 to 3-6 • General Description and Development Patterns • Current Land Use Plan (2010) • Recent Changes in Land Use • Zoning • Summary • Recommendations Chapter 4 Township Characteristics 4-1 to 4-8 • Introduction • Brief History • General Demographics • Analysis • Summary Chapter 5 Natural and Historic Resources 5-1 to 5-14 • Introduction • Natural Resources Elements, Recommendations, Summary • Historic Resources Elements, Recommendations, Summary Chapter 6 Economics & Economic Development 6-1 to 6-4 • Economics and the Comprehensive Plan • Current Economic Conditions • Projected Economic Conditions • Economic Status of the Township • The 2010 Census Data • Review of the Objectives of the 1998 Plan’s Economic Development Chapter • Relationship to the Revitalization Plan Chapter • Considerations for the Future TC-1 Chapter 7 Transportation & Circulation 7-1 to 7-17 • Introduction • Goals and Objectives • Inventory of Travel Modes • Prior Planning Studies & Planning Principles • Recommendations • Funding Programs Chapter 8 Recreation and Community Facilities 8-1 to 8-15 • Parks, Recreation, and Open Space • Educational Facilities • Southampton Free Library • Municipal Services • Health Care Facilities • Goals and Objectives • Summary Chapter 9 Utilities 9-1 to 9-8 • Introduction • Utilities Services • Solid Waste Management • Stormwater Management • Electricity Service • Energy Efficiency and Sustainability • Issues and Recommendations for Action Planning • Relationships to Growth, Land Use, and Revitalization Chapter 10 Housing 10-1 to 10-12 • Overview • Existing Housing Characteristics • Recommended Actions: Residential Development • Sustainable Design Applicability Chapter 11 Revitalization Plan 11-1 to 11-13 • Introduction and Purpose • Past Planning Efforts • Current Regional Influences/Patterns • Corridors for Revitalization • Current Land Uses/Gap Analysis for Future Land Uses • Measures for Revitalization • Revitalization and Sustainability • Goals, Objectives, Implementation Recommendations, and Next Steps • Summary Chapter 12 Growth Areas & Future Land Use Plan 12-1 to 12-11 • Introduction and Purpose • Overall Planning Issues • Special Study Areas • Vacant Parcels in Existing Residential Districts/Neighborhoods • Parks, Floodplains, and Wetlands • Recommendations Summary – Future Directions TC-2 Chapter 13 Plan Relationships and Compatibility 13-1 to 13-11 • Introduction • Relationship Between Plan Components • Compatibility with Surrounding Municipalities, and Planning Documents • Summary Observations and Conclusions Chapter 14 Plan of Action 14-1 to 14-15 • Understanding • Development Today and Projected Changes • Plan Chapters’ Goals and Objectives, Funding Sources, Time Frames, and Responsible Parties • Summary LISTING OF TABLES, EXHIBITS, MAPS (by Chapter) Chapter 3 Existing Land Use and Zoning Table 3.1 – 2005 Land Use (square miles and percentages) 3-4 Table 3.2 – Land Use Zoning Category Breakdown 3-5 Map 1 – Zoning Map 3- 5 a. Chapter 4 Township Characteristics Map 2 – General Features Map 4- 2 a. Table 4.1 – Population, 2000 4-3 Table 4.2 – Projected Population, 2000-2035 4-4 Table 4.3 – Population by Age group, 2000 4-4 Table 4.4 – Population Age Cohort Analysis 4-5 Table 4.5 – Racial Composition, 2000 4-5 Table 4.6 – Educational Attainment, 2000 4-6 Table 4.7 – Income and Poverty, 2000 4-6 Table 4.8 – Occupation, 2000 4-7 Table 4.9 – Employment Forecast, 2000-2035 4-7 Chapter 5 Natural and Historic Resources Map 3 – Natural Resources Features – Hydrology 5- 4 a. Chapter 7 Transportation and Circulation Table 7.1 – Urbanized Area Functional Classification characteristics 7-3, 4 Table 7.2 – Average Daily Traffic Volume 7-4 Table 7.3 – SEPTA Regional Rail Locations 7-6 Figure 7.1 – Bike Route Map 7-7 Table 7.4 – Funding Programs 7-16, 17 TC-3 Chapter 8 Recreation and Community Facilities Table 8.1 – Upper Southampton Recreational Facilities 8-2 Table 8.2 – Enrollment in Elementary Schools, 2005-2008 8-6, 7 Table 8.3 – Enrollment in Middle Schools, 2005-2008 8-7 Table 8.4 – Enrollment in High School, 2005-2008 8-7 Table 8.5 – Centennial School District Elementary Schools – 8-8 Existing Conditions Table 8.6 – General Hospitals, 2000-2001 8-13 Table 8.7 – General Hospital Statistics, 2000-2001 8-14 Table 8.8 – Nursing Homes, 2006 8-14 Table 8.9 – Nursing Home Statistics, 2006 8-14 Chapter 9 Utilities Map 4 – Sanitary Sewerage Service Areas 9-1.a Map 5 – Water Supply Service Areas 9-1.b Chapter 10 Housing Table 10.1 – Residential Composition & Characteristics, 10-2 Definitions, 2000 Table 10.2 – Housing Types, 2000 10-2 Table 10.3 – Occupied Housing Units, by Year Built, 2000 10-3 Table 10.4 – Value of specified Owner-occupied Housing Units, 10-6 2000 Table 10.5 – Nursing Homes, 2006 10-7 Table 10.6 – Nursing Home Statistics, 2006 10-8 Table 10.7 – Housing Units Authorized by Residential 10-8 Building Permits, 2000-2007 Table 10.8 – Projected Housing Growth, 2000-2020 10-9 Chapter 12 Growth Areas & Future Land Use Plan Map 6 – Future Land Use Plan Map 12- 1 a. APPENDIX A. Glossary of Terms, Zoning Tables, and Acronyms A-1 to A-11 B. Summary of Public/Resident Survey Responses B-1 to B-11 C. Minutes of Meetings with the Southampton Business and Professionals Association, C-1 to C-4 and the Owners, Occupants, and Operators of the Industrial Area Businesses D. Library Strategic Plans D-1 to D-4 E. Data Sources and Resources E-1 TC-4 2010 Upper Southampton Comprehensive Plan Update Chapter 1, Introduction and Purpose A. Introduction, Purpose, and Background Upper Southampton last updated its Comprehensive Plan in 1998. Certain recommendations of the 1998 Comprehensive Plan materialized, indicating that such planning provides a proactive approach to accommodating change and can assist the Township in realizing many of its goals. In 1998, the now- recognized need for sustainable actions and activities was not a current issue then. The intervening years have shown that planning for sustainability is a paramount concern, therefore this Plan update seeks to address this topic from the prospective and with the principles of Smart Growth, Green Growth, and Sustainability. Although changes within the Township over the past 11 or so years have been modest because of its urban/suburban condition, Upper Southampton must plan for a sustainable future, one that enhances the quality of life and promotes economic vitality with renewed vigor. Thus, the Township’s initiative to update the 1998 Comprehensive Plan is very timely. This update of the Upper Southampton Township Comprehensive Plan is prepared under the authority granted by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to municipalities to prepare comprehensive plans in accordance with the provisions of the PA Municipalities Planning Code (MPC). Article III of the MPC provides requirements regarding the content and information that must be included as part of a comprehensive plan. A comprehensive plan should provide a foundation for local planning in a regional-context, a ready resource containing the policies that guide land use decisions in a community. It can help a community to shape and/or re-shape its future by guiding the formulation of zoning and subdivision ordinances, the acquisition/preservation of open space, transportation improvements, the protection of natural and historic resources, the provision of community facilities, and appropriate commercial, retail, and industrial revitalization. This update is intended to ensure that the Upper Southampton Township Comprehensive Plan continues to serve as such a resource. The plan provides a road map for housing, land use, community facilities, and transportation.
Recommended publications
  • Hampshire and the Company of White Paper Makers

    Hampshire and the Company of White Paper Makers

    HAMPSHIRE AND THE COMPANY OF WHITE PAPER MAKERS By J. H. THOMAS, B.A. HAMPSHIRE has long been associated with the manufacturing of writing materials, parchment being made at Andover, in the north of the county, as early as the 13th century.1 Not until some four centuries later, however, did Hampshire embark upon the making of paper, with Sir Thomas Neale (1565-1620/1) financing the construction of the one-vat mill at Warnford, in the Meon Valley, about the year 1618. As far as natural requirements were concerned, Hampshire was well-endowed for the making of paper. Clear, swift chalk-based streams ensured a steady supply of water, for use both as motive power and in the actual process of production. Rags, old ropes and sails provided the raw materials for conversion into paper, while labour was to be found in the predominantly rural population. The amount of capital required varied depend­ ing on the size of the mill concerned, and whether it was a conversion of existing plant, as happened at Bramshott during the years 1640-90, or whether the mill was an entirely new construction as was the case at Warnford and, so far as is known, the case with Frog Mill at nearby Curdridge. Nevertheless Hampshire, like other paper-making counties, was subject to certain restraining factors. A very harsh winter, freezing the water supply, would lead to a cut-back in production. A shortage of materials and the occurrence of Holy days would have a similar result, so that in 1700 contemporaries reckoned on an average working year of roughly 200 days.2 Serious outbreaks of plague would also hamper production, the paper-makers of Suffolk falling on hard times for this reason in 1638.3 Though Hampshire had only one paper mill in 1620, she possessed a total of ten by 1700,4 and with one exception all were engaged in the making of brown paper.
  • Historical Profile of Hampton Bays, Phase I

    Historical Profile of Hampton Bays, Phase I

    HISTORIC PROFILE OF HAMPTON BAYS Phase I GOOD GROUND MONTAUK HIGHWAY CORRIDOR and CANOE PLACE MONTAUK HIGHWAY, GOOD GROUND 1935 by Charles F. Duprez Prepared by: Barbara M. Moeller June 2005 Additional copies of the HISTORIC PROFILE OF HAMPTON BAYS: Phase I May be obtained through Squires Press POB 995 Hampton Bays, NY 11946 $25 All profits to benefit: The Hampton Bays Historical & Preservation Society HISTORIC PROFILE OF HAMPTON BAYS INTRODUCTION: The Town of Southampton has sponsored this survey of his- toric resources to complement existing and forthcoming planning initiatives for the Hamlet of Hampton Bays. A Hampton Bays Montauk Highway Corridor (Hamlet Centers) Study is anticipated to commence in the near future. A review of Hampton Bays history and an inventory of hamlet heritage resources is considered a necessary component in order to help insure orderly and coordinated development within the Hamlet of Hampton Bays in a manner that respects community character. Hampton Bays United, a consortium of community organizations, spearheaded the initiative to complete a historical profile for Hampton Bays and a survey of hamlet heritage re- sources. The 2000 Hampton Bays Hamlet Center Strategy Plan adopted as an update to the 1999 Comprehensive Plan was limited to an area from the railroad bridge tres- tle on Montauk Highway near West Tiana Road (westerly border) to the Montauk Highway railroad bridge near Bittersweet Avenue (easterly border.) Shortly, the De- partment of Land Management will be preparing a “Hampton Bays Montauk High- way Corridor Land Use/Transportation Strategy Study” which will span the entire length of Montauk Highway from Jones Road to the Shinnecock Canal.
  • (TMDL) Assessment for the Neshaminy Creek Watershed in Southeast Pennsylvania Table of Contents

    (TMDL) Assessment for the Neshaminy Creek Watershed in Southeast Pennsylvania Table of Contents

    Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Assessment for the Neshaminy Creek Watershed in Southeast Pennsylvania Table of Contents Page A1.0 OVERVIEW………………………………………………………………………… 1 A2.0 HYDROLOGIC /WATER QUALITY MODELING………………………………. 8 A2.1 Data Compilation and Model Overview………………………………………… 8 A2.2 GIS-Based Derivation of Input Data……………………………………………. 10 A2.3 Watershed Model Calibration…………………………………………………… 10 A2.4 Relationship Between Dissolved Oxygen Levels, Nutrient Loads and Organic Enrichment…………………………………………………………….. 16 B. POINT SOURCE TMDLs FOR THE ENTIRE NESHAMINY CREEK WATERSHED (Executive Summary)……….……….………………………. 18 B1.0 INTRODUCTION.…………………………………………………………………. 19 B2.0 EVALUATION OF POINT SOURCE LOADS……………………………………. 20 B3.0 REACH BY REACH ASSESSMENT……………………………………………… 27 B3.1 Cooks Run (482A)………………………………………………………………. 27 B3.2 Little Neshaminy Creek (980629-1342-GLW)………………..………………… 27 B3.3 Mill Creek (20010417-1342-GLW)…………………………………………….. 29 B3.4 Neshaminy Creek (467)………………………………………….……………… 30 B3.5 Neshaminy Creek (980515-1347-GLW)..…………………….………….……… 32 B3.6 Neshaminy Creek (980609-1259-GLW)………………………..………………. 32 B3.7 Park Creek (980622-1146-GLW)………………………………..……………… 34 B3.8 Park Creek (980622-1147-GLW)……………………………..………………… 35 B3.9 West Branch Neshaminy Creek (492)……………………………..……………. 35 B3.10 West Branch Neshaminy Creek (980202-1043-GLW)…………..……………. 36 B3.11 West Branch Neshaminy Creek (980205-1330-GLW)………………………… 37 B3.12 West Branch Neshaminy Creek (980205-1333-GLW)………………………… 38 C. LITTLE NESHAMINY CREEK……………………………………………………… 40 D. LAKE GALENA……………………………………………………………………… 58 E. PINE RUN…………………………………………………………………………….. 78 i Table of Contents (cont.) Page F. SUB-BASIN #1 OF WEST BRANCH NESHAMINY CREEK……………………… 94 G. SUB-BASIN #2 OF WEST BRANCH NESHAMINY CREEK……………………… 107 H. SUB-BASIN #3 OF WEST BRANCH NESHAMINY CREEK…………………….. 121 I. SUB-BASIN #4 OF WEST BRANCH NESHAMINY CREEK……………………… 138 J. COOKS RUN………………………………………………………………………….. 155 K.
  • Prepared by the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission

    Prepared by the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission

    Prepared by the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission BUCKS COUNTY FLOOD RECOVERY AND MITIGATION STRATEGY Prepared for the U.S. Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration Prepared by the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission This Economic Adjustment Strategy was accomplished by staff of the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission through Economic Development Administration Adjustment Strategy Grant No. 01-09-58005. The statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and other data in this report are solely those of the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Economic Development Administration. The background flood map is used in part solely for state affairs only. courtesy FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION SEPTEMBER 1998 DELAWARE VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION Publication Abstract TITLE Date Published: September 1998 Bucks County Flood Recovery and Mitigation Strategy Publication No. 98032 Geographic Area Covered: Bucks County Key Words: Floods, Flooding, Floodplain, Flood Prone, Flood Proofing, Regulations, Impervious Coverage, Watersheds, Sub-Basin 2, Emergency Management, Neshaminy Creek, Buck Creek, Brock Creek, National Flood Insurance Program, Levee, Dam, Floodwall, Acquisition, Relocation, Army Corps of Engineers, Delaware River Basin Commission ABSTRACT This report provides a flood recovery and mitigation strategy for those flood prone communities in Bucks County. As an element of a flood mitigation plan for eastern Pennsylvania, which
  • 14Th Major Port US Army: Southampton

    14Th Major Port US Army: Southampton

    D-Day: 14th Major Port US Stories Army: Southampton from Origin & Context the Walls During the Maritime Archaeology Trust’s National Lottery Heritage Funded D-Day Stories from the Walls project, volunteers undertook online research into topics and themes linked to D-Day, Southampton, ships and people during the Second World War. Their findings were used to support project outreach and dissemination. This Research Article was undertaken by one of our volunteers and represents many hours of hard and diligent work. We would like to take this opportunity to thank all our amazing volunteers. Every effort has been made to trace the copyright hold- ers and obtain permission to reproduce this material. Please do get in touch with any enquiries or any information relating to any images or the rights holder. D-Day Stories from the Walls: Southampton – 14th Major Port US Army, Origin & Context ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 14th Major US Army Port Southampton ORIGIN AND CONTEXT Figure 1: US Army Transportation Corps Insignia Source: http://www.milbadges.com/corps/USA/transportation From CivicHeraldry.com Southampton was the largest passenger port in the country, so it was well suited for handling very large numbers of troops. Due to its location at the head of Southampton Water, into which the rivers Test and, adjacent to the docks, the Itchen flow, it is well sheltered and being approximately mid-way along the English Channel, the port also uniquely experiences a daily double high tide leading to prolonged periods of high water, thus greatly facilitating the movement of large ships at all states of the tide.
  • SEPTA Suburban St & Transit Map Web 2021

    SEPTA Suburban St & Transit Map Web 2021

    A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z AA BB CC Stoneback Rd Old n d California Rd w d Rd Fretz Rd R o t n R d Dr Pipersville o Rd Smiths Corner i Rd Run Rd Steinsburg t n w TohickonRd Eagle ta Pk Rolling 309 a lo STOCKTON S l l Hill g R Rd Kellers o Tollgate Rd in h HAYCOCK Run Island Keiser p ic Rd H Cassel um c h Rd P Portzer i Tohickon Rd l k W West a r Hendrick Island Tavern R n Hills Run Point Pleasant Tohickon a Norristown Pottstown Doylestown L d P HellertownAv t 563 Slotter Bulls Island Brick o Valley D Elm Fornance St o i Allentown Brick TavernBethlehem c w Carversvill- w Rd Rd Mervine k Rd n Rd d Pottsgrove 55 Rd Rd St Pk i Myers Rd Sylvan Rd 32 Av n St Poplar St e 476 Delaware Rd 90 St St Erie Nockamixon Rd r g St. John's Av Cabin NJ 29 Rd Axe Deer Spruce Pond 9th Thatcher Pk QUAKERTOWN Handle R Rd H.S. Rd State Park s St. Aloysius Rd Rd l d Mill End l La Cemetery Swamp Rd 500 202 School Lumberville Pennsylvania e Bedminster 202 Kings Mill d Wismer River B V Orchard Rd Rd Creek u 1 Wood a W R S M c Cemetery 1 Broad l W Broad St Center Bedminster Park h Basin le Cassel Rockhill Rd Comfort e 1100 y Weiss E Upper Bucks Co.
  • Journal of the Southampton Local History Forum No

    Journal of the Southampton Local History Forum No

    Journal of the Southampton Local History Forum No. 22 Spring 2014 Contents Abraham Abraham: a forgotten politician of mid-nineteenth century Southampton by Richard Preston Page 3 Henry March Gilbert 1846-1931: ‘Staunch Liberal and Nonconformist’ by Roger Ottewill Page 11 Chief Justice Richard Lyster 1480-1553 by Alec Samuels Page 19 New Place House, Southampton by A G K Leonard Page 21 John Plaw, John Kent and John Taylor: three late-18th/early-19th century Southampton architects by Richard Preston Page 33 Southampton Local History Forum Southampton Local History Forum is sponsored by Southampton Library Service. Membership is free and is open to everyone interested in the history of the city and its neighbourhood. A programme of evening meetings is arranged for the third Thursday of each month (August and December excepted) between 7.00pm and 9.00pm. Anyone interested in joining the forum should contact - David Hollingworth Southampton Central Library Civic Centre Southampton SO14 7LW Tel: 023 80 832205 Email: [email protected] The articles in the Journal are written by members of the Forum, to whom thanks are due. Contributions from members to future editions are always welcome. Cover illustration: Block plan of the Central Library showing the site of New Place House. The plan is from the rejected designs for the new library by Sidney Robert James Smith. Richard Preston Abraham Abraham: a forgotten politician of mid-nineteenth century Southampton This brief political biography is a study in unfulfilled potential. It draws inspiration from the discussion of Abraham’s rise and fall by Professor Tony Kushner in Anglo-Jewry since 1066: place, locality and memory, published by Manchester University Press in 2009.
  • Delaware River Basin Commission § 430.13

    Delaware River Basin Commission § 430.13

    Delaware River Basin Commission § 430.13 drilling. Such notice shall be in writing (2) A written report prepared by a and shall specify the location of pro- hydrogeologist describing the expected posed new facility, the anticipated rate effects of the proposed withdrawal on of withdrawal, and the general purpose existing wells, flows of perennial of the proposed water use. The notice streams and the long-term lowering of shall also state the location of existing ground water levels. wells within the radius set forth in (3) A log showing the nature of sub- § 430.21(a). surface material encountered during (b) Whenever the Executive Director the construction and installation of shall deem necessary, or upon request the exploratory or production well(s). of a party proposing a new or expanded (4) The detailed results of extended withdrawal of ground water, an infor- pump tests, of not less than 48 hours mal conference may be scheduled to re- duration, and records of observations view the nature of the proposed with- during such pump tests from represent- drawal, the applicability of the Com- ative monitoring wells. mission’s standards relating to ground (b) Applications for a protected area water, and the requirements of a pro- permits whose daily average with- tected area permit under this regula- drawal during any calendar month is in tion. excess of 10,000 gallons shall be accom- panied by an application fee of $100. § 430.13 Protected area permits for new withdrawals. Government agencies shall be exempt from such application fee. Any
  • Former Ford Factory, Wide Lane PDF 2 MB

    Former Ford Factory, Wide Lane PDF 2 MB

    Planning, Transport & Sustainabilityth Division Planning and Rights of Way Panel 25 March 2014 Planning Application Report of the Planning and Development Manager Application address: (Former) Ford Motor Co, Wide Lane Proposed developmen t: Use of the existing buildings at the rear of the site as a vehicle repair centre and export distribution centre with alterations to the existing buildings. Changes to the secure fence line of the existing Mansbridge Road car park to enlarge the vehicle storage area with new perimeter fencing, barriers, lighting columns, CCTV and associated works. Application 14/00028/FUL Application type FUL number Case officer Stephen Harrison Public speaking 15 minutes time Last date for 07.04.2014 Ward Swaythling determination: Reason for Panel Major planning Ward Councillors Cllr Mintoff Referral: application subject to Cllr Turner objection Cllr Vassiliou Applicant : Ford Motor Company Ltd Agent: Rolton Group Ltd Recommendation Conditionally appr ove Summary Community Not applicable Infrastructure Levy Liable Reason for granting Planning Permission The development is acceptable taking into account the policies and proposals of the Development Plan as set out below. Other materialth considerations as set out in the report to the Planning and Rights of Way Panel on 25 March 2014 have been considered and are not judged to have sufficient weight to justify a refusal of the application, and where applicable conditions have been applied in order to satisfy these matters. The scheme is therefore judged to be in accordance with Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and thus planning permission should therefore be granted. In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority offered a pre-application planning service and has sought to work with the applicant in a positive and proactive manner as required by paragraphs 186-187 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2012).
  • Epidemic Diseases, Soldiers and Prisoners of War in Southampton, 1550-1800

    Epidemic Diseases, Soldiers and Prisoners of War in Southampton, 1550-1800

    Proc. Hampsh. Field Club Archaeol. Soc. 43, 1987, 185-196 EPIDEMIC DISEASES, SOLDIERS AND PRISONERS OF WAR IN SOUTHAMPTON, 1550-1800 By MARY L SOUTH ABSTRACT ned for the wellbeing of the townspeople and the registers give some details of conditions Communities frequently suffered vicissitudes of fortune with within the town during times of affliction. regard to the health of their inhabitants. Some of these were Of the other registers, Holy Rood's do not directly attributable to national famine, extremes of weather begin until 1653, but are complete apart from or epidemics. Many outbreaks of disease, however, were one break during the plague of 1665. All Saints confined to one community or area. Scrutiny of ostensibly start in 1653 also, but were badly Southampton's local epidemics indicates that nearly one in damaged when the church was bombed during three appear to be directly related to a military presence in the town. Such occurrences usually resulted from the embarkation the Second World War. Only the years 1653- or disembarkation of troops employed in overseas enterprises. 1663 survive from the seventeenth century, but This article is devoted to the outbreaks of disease in relation to the records are complete from 1723. There are this military presence and the lodgement of prisoners of war. no extant registers for the separate parishes of St Lawrence and St John, only those for the combined parish commencing in 1768. INTRODUCTION AND PARISH SOURCES Thus, it can be seen that the first one hundred years of this survey was reliant upon Within the town there were five parish the registers of St Michael's and the French churches, two on the west side, St Michael's Church, but that from the mid seventeenth and St John's and three on the east side, St.
  • Bygone Hampshire

    Bygone Hampshire

    71^' YGONE >.'': i^;-:^'•':-;C "'•}'• 1,.-^ i'.'( > y--^"' University of | Southern jii brary pj WILLI A M ANDREWS'"^ z "^ . ''^'K^ C> '"kti '^Cit^.'^'^' ^^' ^^ .-. V*' BYGONE HAMPSHIRE. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2007 with funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/bygonehampshireOOandriala Ftoni a Photo by\ \F. A. Grant. WEST FRONT, WINCHESTKK CATHEDRAL. : Begone - - Ibampebtre MtUiam anDrew6 LONDON WILLIAM ANDREWS & CO., 5, FARRINGDON AVENUE. 1899. DA H p. A 5-7 preface. I "HE history of Hampshire in the olden time is of unusual interest, and I hope the follow- ing pages dealing with it in a popular and exact manner will not fail to entertain and instruct the reader. Considerable attention is paid to Silches- ter, which is a place of national, as well as local, importance. William Andrews. The Hull Press, May jDay, i8gg. 645945 Contents. PACK. Historic Hampshire. By Thomas Frost. .... i The Romano-British City of Silchester. By Frederick Davis, F.s.A. 17 England's First Capital. By Thomas Frost. ... 75 Winchester Cathedral. By England Howlett. ... 88 The Hospital of St. Cross. By the Rev. Geo. S. Tyack, b.a. ioi Winchester College. By the Rev. Geo. S. Tyack, b.a. - 113 The New Forest. By Thomas Frost. 126 The Death of William Rufus. By Thomas Frost - - 134 St. Swithin. By the Rev. Geo. S. Tyack, b.a. - - - 140 William of Wykeham. By the Rev. Geo. S. Tyack, b.a. - 151 The Sanctuary of Beaulieu Abbey. By Thomas Frost. - 158 Southampton in the Olden Time. By Thomas Frost. - - 166 The Old Religious Houses of Southampton.
  • Federal Register/Vol. 70, No. 84/Tuesday, May 3

    Federal Register/Vol. 70, No. 84/Tuesday, May 3

    22854 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 3, 2005 / Notices ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN Annual 17 CFR section number of Total annual Hours per re- Total hours respondents responses sponse Part 190 ........................................................................................................... 376 6173 0.05 309.05 There are no capital costs or operating DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DELAWARE RIVER BASIN and maintenance costs associated with COMMISSION this collection. Department of the Air Force Notice of Commission Meeting and Dated: April 26, 2005. Intent to Grant an Exclusive License Public Hearing Jean A. Webb, Notice is hereby given that the Secretary of the Commission. Pursuant to the provision of part 404 of title 37, Code of Federal Regulations, Delaware River Basin Commission will [FR Doc. 05–8758 Filed 5–2–05; 8:45 am] hold an informal conference followed which implements Public Law 96–517, BILLING CODE 6351–01–M by a public hearing on Wednesday, May as amended, the Department of the Air 18, 2005. The hearing will be part of the Force announces its intention to grant Commission’s regular business meeting. UES, Inc., a corporation of Ohio, having Both the conference session and DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE a place of business at 4401 Dayton- business meeting are open to the public Xenia Road, Dayton, OH, an exclusive and will be held at the Shawnee Inn, Office of the Secretary right, title and interest the Air Force has Shawnee-on-the-Delaware, in: United States Patent Application Pennsylvania. Notice of Closed Meeting Serial Number—11/083,919—High The conference among the Speed & Repeatability Serial Sectioning commissioners and staff will begin at 10 AGENCY: Defense Intelligence Agency, Device for 3–D Reconstruction of a.m.