DOCSLIB.ORG

Structural Anthropology PDF Book

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Structural Anthropology PDF Book STRUCTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Claude Levi-Strauss | 448 pages | 06 Jun 1974 | The Perseus Books Group | 9780465095162 | English | New York, United States Structural Anthropology PDF Book Lists Anthropologists by nationality Anthropology by year Bibliography Journals List of indigenous peoples Organizations. University of California Press: Berkeley. Godelier took structuralism a step further with his examination of infrastructural factors. It may be perhaps because of my lack of knowledge and theoretical abilities that I failed to fully grasp the advantages of his method. That is to say, in relation to our own society we stand in a position of privilege which is exactly contrary to that which I have just described; for our own society is the only one that we can transform and yet not destroy, since the changes we should introduce would come from within. Trivia About Structural Anthro I do not believe that I am being unfaithful to their teachings by trying, seventy years after Lewis H. Great care should be taken to distinguish between the observational and the experimental levels. There are no necessary relationships at the vocabulary level. He is a proponent of anthropology borrowing tools from structural linguistics and mathematics in order to penetrate deeper into its object of study and to refine its processing of material. David Levinson and Melvin Ember, Eds. Great, bu tiedious book for the beginner of anthropology. Goldstein in relation to psycho-physiological studies, and it may be considered valid for any kind of structural analysis. These being the requirements for any model with structural value, several consequences follow. But, yes, a classic, so if you are interested in anthropology is is a must read. It fosters the view that the human mind functions by recognizing or, if none are available, imposing structures. Merquior, J. He also did considerable reading among literary masterpieces, and was deeply immersed in classical and contemporary music. Jan 21, Alexandra Brovco rated it did not like it Shelves: read-in-russian , borrowed-from-library. Fortunately, we have just such a case available. By replacing a complex model with a simple model that has greater logical value, the anthropologist reveals the detours and manoeuvres, conscious and unconscious, that each society uses in an effort to resolve its inherent contradictions — or at any rate to conceal them. Some chapters, nonetheless, are brilliant and accessible enough and one should not miss out on them only because the book as a whole seemed to intimidating. Sturrock, John Structuralism. The outstanding achievements in this connection — which offer themselves as springboards not yet utilised by social scientist e to be found in J. Internal incoherence and a range of intrinsic limitations further reduced its appeal. He became a professor of sociology at the University of Sao Paulo in Brazil in However cool that may sound and however impressive the application of this stance as illustrated in many chapters of the book , I couldn't help feeling some kind of reluctance to accept it. Though there are few anthropologists today who would declare themselves structuralists, structuralism was highly influential. If every society has the same flaw, manifested by the two-fold problem — of logical disharmony and social inequality, why should its more thoughtful members endeavour to change it? This illustrated two opposites in conflict and then resolved. Archaeological Biological Cultural Linguistic Social. Marxists shifted the attention within anthropology from an almost exclusive preoccupation with kinship to an emphasis on economic issues. Nevertheless, there are many men especially in Billancourt who accept the idea of a personal existence confined to the duration of their earthly life; they have not for this reason abandoned their sense of morality or their willingness to work for the improvement of their lot and that of their descendants. More Details Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Thus, for each system, one might ask what relationships are expressed and, for each term of the system, what connotation — positive or negative — it carries regarding each of the following relationships: generation, collaterality, sex, relative age, affinity, etc. The structures that form the "deep grammar" of society originate in the mind and operate unconsciously albeit not in a Freudian sense. The most characteristic feature of the Prague school approach is its combination of structuralism with functionalism. The house-wrecker and the architect are right to believe only in Euclidean geometry, but they do not try to force it upon the astronomer. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. Key theories. Structural Anthropology Writer But I am not a sociologist, and my interest in our own society is only a secondary one. Because the relationship between nephew and maternal uncle appears to have been the focus of significant elaboration in a great many primitive societies, anthropologists have devoted special attention to it. In relation to the anthropological research conducted during the same period, the difference was one of degree rather than of kind. Just as a language is composed of significant oppositions e. Structuralism Article Additional Info. I wish to point out, first, that the distinctions developed in Race and History among stationary history, fluctuating history and cumulative history can be derived from Marx himself:. Whatever interpretation is given to the data collected by Hocart and his own interpretation is not entirely satisfactory , there is no doubt that the linguist contributes to the solution of the problem by revealing the tenacious survival in contemporary vocabulary of relationships which have long since disappeared. In our haste to apply the methods of linguistic analysis, we must not forget that, as a part of vocabulary, kinship terms must be treated with linguistic methods in direct and not analogous fashion. Should Revel hasten to protest, let me add that I am only paraphrasing Engels, who by chance expressed his opinion on this problem, and with respect to the same societies which Revel has in mind. Outline History. Fortunately, we have just such a case available. Key theories. His work was heavily influenced by Emile Durkheim and Marcel Mauss as well as the Prague School of structural linguistics organized in which include Roman Jakobson — , and Nikolai Troubetzkoy — The "Leiden" perspective drove research for many decades, influencing successive generations of anthropologists. This is one of those books that is more edifying than entertaining. The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree And he would have more precise ideas of the proportions and the kinds of goods involved in certain cases and in certain periods. Like most of Levi-Strauss it's a bit difficult to read, takes some time to analyze his points but once understood it's well worth the effort of finishing this book. This rule implies, in turn, that facts should be studied in relation to themselves by what kind of concrete process did they come into being? Start your review of Structural Anthropology. Each detail of terminology and each special marriage rule is associated with a specific custom as either its consequence or its survival. From then on we are among colleagues, and Revel can freely tread on my reserves, without realising that he is behaving toward anthropology exactly as, throughout his book, he upbraids philosophers for behaving toward the other empirical sciences. The last few years have provided numerous examples of groups whose chart of kinship terms does not accurately reflect family attitudes, and vice versa. Error rating book. Noblesse oblige. Leach charged the latter with neglecting the effects of material conditions on social relations. In his view, these transformations were dialectic, and in some cases he went to great lengths to discover the crucial transformation which at first sight seemed to defy analysis. Structural Anthropology Reviews Methodologies Folk stories, religious stories, and fairy tales were the principle subject matter for structuralists because they believed these made manifest the underlying universal human structures, the binary oppositions. Exogamy promotes inter-group alliances and forms structures of social networks. Social anthropology presented right. Over time, marriage rules create social structures because marriages are primarily forged between groups and not just between spouses. Consequently, the last wife-taking group in the chain is significantly inferior to the first wife-giving group to which it is supposed to give its wives. Further, the theoretical approach offered by structuralism emphasizes that elements of culture must be understood in terms of their relationship to the entire system Rubel and Rosman Structural studies are, in the social sciences, the indirect outcome of modern developments in mathematics which have given increasing importance to the qualitative point of view in contradistinction to the quantitative point of view of traditional mathematics. The function was obvious; the system remained unknown. For them, social structures were primarily shaped by material conditions, property relations and class struggles. But he begins by changing me into a sociologist, after which he
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Structuralism 1. the Nature of Meaning Or Understanding
    Structuralism 1. The nature of meaning or understanding. A. The role of structure as the system of relationships Something can only be understood (i.e., a meaning can be constructed) within a certain system of relationships (or structure). For example, a word which is a linguistic sign (something that stands for something else) can only be understood within a certain conventional system of signs, which is language, and not by itself (cf. the word / sound and “shark” in English and Arabic). A particular relationship within a شرق combination society (e.g., between a male offspring and his maternal uncle) can only be understood in the context of the whole system of kinship (e.g., matrilineal or patrilineal). Structuralism holds that, according to the human way of understanding things, particular elements have no absolute meaning or value: their meaning or value is relative to other elements. Everything makes sense only in relation to something else. An element cannot be perceived by itself. In order to understand a particular element we need to study the whole system of relationships or structure (this approach is also exactly the same as Malinowski’s: one cannot understand particular elements of culture out of the context of that culture). A particular element can only be studied as part of a greater structure. In fact, the only thing that can be studied is not particular elements or objects but relationships within a system. Our human world, so to speak, is made up of relationships, which make up permanent structures of the human mind. B. The role of oppositions / pairs of binary oppositions Structuralism holds that understanding can only happen if clearly defined or “significant” (= essential) differences are present which are called oppositions (or binary oppositions since they come in pairs).
    [Show full text]
  • CLAUDE LEVI-STRAUSS: the Man and His Works
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Nebraska Anthropologist Anthropology, Department of 1977 CLAUDE LEVI-STRAUSS: The Man and His Works Susan M. Voss University of Nebraska-Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro Part of the Anthropology Commons Voss, Susan M., "CLAUDE LEVI-STRAUSS: The Man and His Works" (1977). Nebraska Anthropologist. 145. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/145 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Anthropology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nebraska Anthropologist by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in THE NEBRASKA ANTHROPOLOGIST, Volume 3 (1977). Published by the Anthropology Student Group, Department of Anthropology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588 21 / CLAUDE LEVI-STRAUSS: The Man and His Works by Susan M. Voss 'INTRODUCTION "Claude Levi-Strauss,I Professor of Social Anth- ropology at the College de France, is, by com­ mon consent, the most distinguished exponent ~f this particular academic trade to be found . ap.ywhere outside the English speaking world ... " (Leach 1970: 7) With this in mind, I am still wondering how I came to be embroiled in an attempt not only to understand the mul t:ifaceted theorizing of Levi-Strauss myself, but to interpret even a portion of this wide inventory to my colleagues. ' There is much (the maj ori ty, perhaps) of Claude Levi-Strauss which eludes me yet. To quote Edmund Leach again, rtThe outstanding characteristic of his writing, whether in French or in English, is that it is difficul tto unders tand; his sociological theories combine bafflingcoinplexity with overwhelm­ ing erudi tion"., (Leach 1970: 8) .
    [Show full text]
  • Claude Lévi-Strauss at His Centennial: Toward a Future Anthropology Albert Doja
    Claude Lévi-Strauss at his Centennial: toward a future anthropology Albert Doja To cite this version: Albert Doja. Claude Lévi-Strauss at his Centennial: toward a future anthropology. Theory, Culture and Society, SAGE Publications, 2008, 25 (7-8), pp.321-340. 10.1177/0263276408097810. halshs- 00405936 HAL Id: halshs-00405936 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00405936 Submitted on 5 Oct 2009 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 321-340 097810 Doja (D) 1/12/08 11:52 Page 321 Published in: "Theory, Culture & Society", vol. 25 (7-8), 2008, pp. 321–340 Claude Lévi-Strauss at His Centennial Toward a Future Anthropology Albert Doja Abstract Lévi-Strauss’s centennial is an opportunity to show his inextricable connec- tions with the evolution of 20th-century thought and what these promise for 21st-century anthropology. He has mapped the philosophical parameters for a renewed ethnography which opens innovative approaches to history, agency, culture and society. The anthropological understanding of history, for instance, is enriched by methodical application of his mytho-logical analysis, in particular his claim that myths are ‘machines for the suppression of time’.
    [Show full text]
  • Michel Serres and the Emergence of Social Order
    Social Chaosmos: Michel Serres and the emergence of social order Kelvin Clayton A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Staffordshire University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2011 Contents Table of contents ii Abstract iv 1 General introduction 1 1.1 Micro / macro problem: theory 1 1.2 Micro / macro problem: praxis 7 1.3 General approach to the problem 13 2 Literature review 17 2.1 Philosophy 17 2.2 Social Theory 20 2.3 Complexity Science 24 3 Methodology and Michel Serres 27 3.0 Introduction: the methodology of Michel Serres 27 3.1 Serres: key ideas 32 3.2 Serres: comparative methodology 35 3.3 Serres: complexity science 43 3.4 Serres: thinking the multiple 56 3.5 Serres: empiricism 61 3.6 Conclusion: the methodology of this thesis 65 4 Existing approaches to social multiplicities 68 4.0 Introduction 68 4.1 Badiou: the void and multiplicities 69 4.2 Deleuze and Guattari: the arborescent and the rhizomic 82 4.3 DeLanda: nested sets 93 4.4 Conclusion 106 5 Non-units of social organisation 108 5.0 Introduction 108 5.1 Foucault: power relations 108 ii 5.2 Tarde: beliefs, desires and memes 122 5.3 Foucault: statements and expectations 134 5.4 Conclusion 146 6 Social (self) organisation 148 6.0 Introduction 148 6.1 Repetition and difference 148 6.2 Imitation and auto-catalytic sets 161 6.3 Codifications: norms and laws 174 6.4 Conclusion 184 7 Conclusion and implications 186 Notes 196 Appendix 201 References and Bibliography 213 iii Abstract This thesis presents a social ontology.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Anthropology by Claude Lévi-Strauss
    Structural Anthropology CLAUDE LÉVI-STRAUSS Structural Anthropology Translated from the French by Claire Jacobson and Brooke Grundfest Schoepf BASIC BOOKS, In c ., Publishers, New York COPYRIGHT © 1963 BY BASIC BOOKS, INC. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOG CARD NUMBER 63-17344 sb n : 465-08229-7 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 74 75 7<5 77 1098765432 May an inconstant disciple dedicate this book which appears in 1958, the year of Émile Durk- heim’s centenary, to the memory of the founder of Année Sociologique: that famed workshop where modem anthropology fashioned part of its tools and which we have abandoned, not so much out of disloyalty as out of the sad convic­ tion that the task would prove too much for us. Xpwrtov fKv πρωτιστα ytvoç. Author’s Preface to the French Edition I n a recent study, Jean Pouillon wrote a sentence w hich, with his permission, I shall cite at the beginning of this work, since it corresponds perfectly to all that I hoped to accomplish in the scientific realm, though often doubtful of having been successful: “ Lévi-Strauss is certainly not the first nor the only one to have emphasized the structural character of social phenomena, but his originality consists in taking that character seriously and in serenely deriving all the consequences from it.” * M y hopes would be ful­ filled if this book could induce other readers to share this judgment. One will find here a collection of seventeen of some one hun­ dred papers written during the past thirty years. A few have been lost; others can profitably remain in oblivion.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropology, Mathematics, Kinship: a Tribute to the Anthropologist Per Hage 1 and His Work with the Mathematician Frank Harary
    MATHEMATICAL ANTHROPOLOGY AND CULTURAL THEORY: AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL VOLUME 2 NO. 3 JULY 2008 ANTHROPOLOGY, MATHEMATICS, KINSHIP: A TRIBUTE TO THE ANTHROPOLOGIST PER HAGE 1 AND HIS WORK WITH THE MATHEMATICIAN FRANK HARARY DAVID JENKINS ROUNDHOUSE INSTITUTE FOR FIELD STUDIES [email protected] COPYRIGHT 2008 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BY AUTHOR SUBMITTED: MAY 1, 2008 ACCEPTED: JUNE 15, 2008 MATHEMATICAL ANTHROPOLOGY AND CULTURAL THEORY: AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ISSN 1544-5879 1 A version of this paper was prepared for the 105th Annual American Anthropological Association Meeting. Session title: Kinship and Language: Per Hage (1935 – 2004) Memorial Session. San Jose, California, November 14 – 18, 2006. JENKINS: ANTHROPOLOGY, MATHEMATICS, KINSHIP WWW.MATHEMATICALANTHROPOLOGY.ORG MATHEMATICAL ANTHROPOLOGY AND CULTURAL THEORY: AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL VOLUME 2 NO. 3 JULY 2008 ANTHROPOLOGY, MATHEMATICS, KINSHIP: A TRIBUTE TO THE ANTHROPOLOGIST PER HAGE AND HIS WORK WITH THE MATHEMATICIAN FRANK HARARY DAVID JENKINS ROUNDHOUSE INSTITUTE FOR FIELD STUDIES Abstract: Over a long and productive career, Per Hage produced a diverse and influential body of work. He conceptualized and solved a range of anthropological problems, often with the aid of mathematical models from graph theory. In three books and many research articles, Hage, and his mathematician collaborator Frank Harary, developed innovative analyses of exchange relations, including marriage, ceremonial, and resource exchange. They advanced network models for the study of communication, language evolution, kinship and classification. And they demonstrated that graph theory provides an analytical framework that is both subtle enough to preserve culturally specific relations and abstract enough to allow for genuine cross-cultural comparison. With graph theory, two common analytical problems in anthropology can be avoided: the problem of hiding cultural phenomena with weak cross-cultural generalizations, and the problem of making misleading comparisons based on incomparable levels of abstraction.
    [Show full text]
  • Claude Lvistrauss (19082009): the Apotheosis of Heroic Anthropology
    Claude Lévi-Strauss (1908-2009) The apotheosis of heroic anthropology Albert Doja Claude Lévi-Strauss died on 30 October 2009. He lived Albert Doja is an Honorary to be a hundred years old and is widely recognized as Research Fellow at the Department of Anthropology, ‘the father of modern anthropology’. Here, Albert Doja University College London, assesses his influence on the discipline and beyond. [Ed.] and Professor of Sociology and Anthropology at the European University, Tirana. The centrality of Claude Lévi-Strauss in the evolution He gained his PhD in social of 20th-century thought shows how he marked the very anthropology from the meaning of the last century and what he might have prom- École des Hautes Études en ised for 21st-century anthropology. Centenary celebra- Sciences Sociales in Paris in 1 2 1993 and is a former research tions and obituaries appeared in a number of places, as fellow of the Laboratoire many anthropologists have written and will continue to d’Anthropologie Sociale write about his life, works, legacy, and his immense contri- founded by Claude Lévi- Strauss. He has held several butions to anthropology. His corpus of work is far-reaching academic positions in France, and comprehensive in scope, encompassing methodology, Britain, Ireland and Albania philosophy, history, humanism, mythology, linguistics, and in 2008 was elected aesthetics, cognition and reasoning. However, his work is to the Albanian Academy of Sciences. His email is often misunderstood and his continuing relevance for con- [email protected]. temporary theory must be acknowledged and accounted for. This is in my view the best way to commemorate his legacy to anthropology.
    [Show full text]
  • Castalia, the Game of Ends and Means | 2016
    JOURNAL > SITE 0: CASTALIA, THE GAME OF ENDS AND MEANS | 2016 Castalia, the Game of Ends and Means Glass Bead The first issue of this journal, as well as Glass Bead‘s project at large, is directed towards rethinking art as a mode of rational thought. This engagement stems from a shared discontent with art’s ongoing exclusion from reason, its positioning at the peripheries of knowledge, and its resulting political inconsequentiality. Our project departs from the assumption that any claim concerning the efficacy of art—its capacity, beyond either its representational function or its affectivity, to make changes in the way we think of the world and act on it—first demands a renewed understanding of reason itself. It might come as a surprise to our readers that while it is an art journal, Glass Bead offers no critical reviews, no art-historical texts on specific works, artists, or exhibitions. None of the discursive practices that commonly surround and legitimize art are present in this journal. This absence is determined by Glass Bead’s methodological decision not to address art from a pre-constituted identity, but rather to dynamically define its role through the exploration of other forms of reasoning (science, philosophy, politics, art, etc.). While it foregrounds transits between disciplines, Glass Bead is not an interdisciplinary journal. In all its scholarly enthusiasm and benevolence, interdisciplinarity has now become some kind of empty motto. Starting from already constituted disciplinary identities, interdisciplinarity seeks connections whose broader impact on the forms of knowledge they connect are consequently silenced. As such, it appears unable to move beyond the implicit equivalence posited between the things it connects.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal Vol 2 Issue 2
    a transdisciplinary biannual research journal Vol. 2 Issue 2 July 2015 Postgraduate Department of English Manjeri, Malappuram, Kerala. www.kahmunityenglish.in/journals/singularities/ Chief Editor P. K. Babu., Ph. D Associate Professor & Head Postgraduate Dept. of English KAHM Unity Women's College, Manjeri. Members: Dr. K. K. Kunhammad, Asst. Professor, Dept. of Studies in English, Kannur University Mammad. N, Asst. Professor, Dept of English, Govt. College, Malappuram. Dr. Priya. K. Nair, Asst. Professor, Dept. of English, St. Teresa's College, Eranakulam. Aswathi. M . P., Asst. Professor, Dept of English, KAHM Unity Women's College, Manjeri. Advisory Editors: Dr. V. C. Haris School of Letters, M.G. University Kottayam Dr. M. V. Narayanan, Assoc. Professor, Dept of English, University of Calicut. Editor's Note The Singularities is into its fourth issue since it was launched in the January 2014 as a transdisciplinary biannual research Journal. The team of teachers at the English Department of KAHM Unity Women's College, Manjeri, has ensured that the Journal is issued promptly within the time frame we have set for the Journal. Not only have we stuck to the mission, but we have contributed to building writing skill and awareness to Research Writing organising workshops and training sessions in quality writing. The current issue with its core on Film, Women and Literature, carries a range of articles connecting the theme at various nodes. The surge of interest in Films and Women seems to offer a lot to complement each other. There appears to be a lot of interest in Cinema but it seems this is slow in getting translated fully into quality writing from the youngsters.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inventiveness of a Tradition: Structural Anthropology in The
    The Inventiveness of aTradition: StructuralAnthropologyin the Netherlands from anoutsider’sperspective PeterBerger Faculty of Theologyand Religious Studies,University of Groningen,the Netherlands Abstract: Leiden structuralanthropologyachieved internationalrenownthrough the workofJ.P.B. and P.E.deJosselin de Jong and theircolleaguesand students.Inthe 1980s,especiallyafterthe retire- mentof P.E.deJosselin de Jong in 1988,itgrewquietaround thisschool.Thisarticle investigatesthe status quoofstructuralanthropologyin the Netherlandsbyfocusing on developments in the last twenty years.Itisargued thatthe structuraltraditioncontinued,though in less conspicuous ways,be- causeitchanged and atthe same time retainedcharacteristicfeatures.Old concepts and methodswere refined and developed,newemphasisadded and currentproblemsapproached. Overthe decadesthis inventiveprocess wasenhanced byacreativeopposition and closebut criticalcooperation withvarious wavesof Frenchstructuralism. Atthe turnofthe twenty-first century,Marshall D.Sahlinsdiagnosed the discipline of anthropologyassuffering from a“paralysing fearof structure” (Sahlins1999:399). Various formsof “afterology”(postmodernism,postcolonialism,etc.),he states,assume morallyappropriateattitudeswithrespecttocolonialismorracism,forexample,but insteadoffacilitating the understanding of othercultureswould rathermake “cultural logicsdisappear”(ibid.:406). Although Europeananthropologymighthavebeen slightlyless in thrall toafterologiesthanelsewhere,itisalsotruethatrecentlythere hasbeen no discernible focus
    [Show full text]
  • Ritual in Prehistory; Definition and Identification. Religious Insights In
    Ritual in Prehistory; Definition and Identification. Religious Insights in Early Prehistoric Cyprus. Volume I Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Archaeology School of History, Classics, and Archaeology University of Edinburgh Vasiliki G. Koutrafouri 2008 Supervisors: Prof. Edgar J. Peltenburg Dr. Ulf-Diedrich Schoop DECLARATION I declare that this thesis is the result of my own work and has not, whether in the same or a different form, been presented to this or any other university in support of an application for any other degree than that for which I am now a candidate. Date……………………………… Signature………………………… Table of Contents Volume I Declaration ................................................................................................................................. Table of Contents......................................................................................................................i List of Figures ............................................................................................................................viii List of Tables..............................................................................................................................xii List of Appendices....................................................................................................................xvi List of Abbreviations ...............................................................................................................xvii Acknowledgements..................................................................................................................xviii
    [Show full text]
  • The Advent of Heroic Anthropology in the History of Ideas
    The Advent of Heroic Anthropology in the History of Ideas Albert Doja Introduction It is sometimes claimed that Radcliffe-Brown and Malinowski more or less single-handedly created modern anthropology. This may have seemed to be the case at midcentury, when Boasian American anthropology had di- verged out into many specialized strands and Marcel Mauss’s students had not yet made their mark in French anthropology. British kinship studies seemed, in contrast, to rest securely on a method invented by Malinowski and a theory developed by Radcliffe-Brown, as an established ‘‘science of soci- ety.’’ As Eriksen and Nielsen put it, major changes took place in anthropology during the 1950s and 1960s, economics and politics were reconceptualized and new theories of symbolic meaning transformed the discipline.1 Develop- ments in North America and Britain differed, although the problems raised were similar, yet the single most important theorist was French. If already in the first postwar years, Claude Le´vi-Strauss will emerge as an exemplary thinker, the most important figure in the history of anthropology and the ‘‘ecumenical,’’ ‘‘paradigmatic anthropologist’’ of the second half of the twentieth century, this implies a good deal about the intellectual milieu of our time and of anthropology in particular.2 In the 1950s and 1960s, for a number of reasons, not the least of which is Le´vi-Strauss’s astute promotion 1 Thomas H. Eriksen and Finn S. Nielsen, A History of Anthropology (London: Pluto Press, 2001), 95. 2 Stanley Diamond, ‘‘The Inauthenticity of Anthropology: The Myth of Structuralism,’’ in In Search of the Primitive: A Critique of Civilization (New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books, 1974), 292–331.
    [Show full text]