DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Biosecurity Plan for Micronesia and Hawaii Volume I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Biosecurity Plan for Micronesia and Hawaii Volume I Regional Biosecurity Plan for Micronesia and Hawaii Volume I Prepared by: University of Guam and the Secretariat of the Pacific Community 2014 This plan was prepared in conjunction with representatives from various countries at various levels including federal/national, state/territory/commonwealth, industry, and non-governmental organizations and was generously funded and supported by the Commander, Navy Installations Command (CNIC) and Headquarters, Marine Corps. Suggested Citation United States Department of the Navy. 2015. Regional Biosecurity Plan for Micronesia and Hawaii, {specify volume}. Eds. University of Guam and the Secretariat of the Pacific Community. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume I 1. Forward v 2. Mission Statement vii 3. Executive Summary ix 4. Introduction 1 4-1. Background 1 4-2. Overview on Invasive Species 2 4-3. Pathways and Vectors Definitions 7 5. Limitations to the Scope of the Regional Biosecurity Plan 7 6. Overview of the Region 8 7. Pertinent Regulatory Drivers 10 8. Overview of the Proposed U.S. Department of Defense Build-up 10 9. Risk Assessments 11 9-1. Overview of the Risk Assessment Process 11 9-2. Caveats to the Risk Assessments 12 10. Example Species of Concern 15 11. Implementation Strategy 16 11-1. Challenges 16 11-2. Needs 18 11-3. Recommendations 18 11-4. Strategies 21 11-5. Costs 26 11-6. Conclusions 28 12. Concluding Remarks 30 13. Citations 31 14. List of Abbreviations 41 15. List of Key Terms 47 16. Acknowledgments 51 Attachment A: Overview of the Island Jurisdictions Included in the Regional Biosecurity Plan Attachment B: Existing Pertinent Rules and Regulations Attachment C: Chuuk State Biosecurity Recommendations Attachment D: Kosrae State Biosecurity Recommendations Attachment E: Pohnpei State Biosecurity Recommendations Attachment F: Yap State Biosecurity Recommendations Attachment G: Federated States of Micronesia National Biosecurity Recommendations Attachment H: Republic of the Marshall Islands Biosecurity Recommendations Attachment I: Republic of Palau Biosecurity Recommendations Attachment J: Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Biosecurity Recommendations Attachment K: State of Hawaii Biosecurity Recommendations Attachment L: Territory of Guam Biosecurity Recommendations Attachment M: United States Department of Defense Biosecurity Recommendations Attachment N: United States Regional Biosecurity Recommendations Attachment O: Models iii Attachment P: Biosecurity Officer Qualifications Attachment Q: List of Consultancy Trips Attachment R: List of Implementation Strategy Workshop Attendees Volume II: Executive Summary to the Risk Assessments and the Freshwater Systems Risk Assessment Volume III: Marine Systems Risk Assessment and Supplement to the Regional Biosecurity Plan for Micronesia and Hawaii Marine Risk Assessment Volume IV: Terrestrial Systems Risk Assessment iv 1. Forward This document, the Regional Biosecurity Plan for Micronesia and Hawaii or RBP, is the work of many, in fact hundreds of individuals. Various government agencies, organizations, and individuals have contributed either through preparing texts that have become elements of this overall document and/or by supplying detailed comments and suggestions which have been used to build the implementation strategy. The concept of building this plan with such extensive input was felt to be the appropriate mechanism to insure that biosecurity needs for the region were comprehensively documented and it is to be hoped that any errors which do exist in this document are minimal and that any existing errors can over time be identified and corrected for future editions of this living document. The RBP was originally termed the Micronesia Biosecurity Plan or MBP. Since the inception of the plan the term MBP has been used for a variety of subcomponents as well as to reference the overall project and the term can be found in earlier documents and components including the risk assessments which are part of the RBP. The risk assessment sections of this document are by far the largest components. These assessments contain a vast array of useful information and details and end users are encouraged to explore them in order to benefit fully from these assessments. Given the extensive size of the risk assessments, an attempt was made to keep the strategic implementation component of the plan as streamlined as feasible to assist end users. The implementation section hinges on the recommendation tables, one table for each jurisdiction, plus additional tables for the U.S. (covering its three jurisdictions within the region) and for the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD). In this regard, the U.S. regional and DoD are treated as jurisdictions, although strictly speaking they are not. The three jurisdictions which fall under U.S. federal oversight and are part of this plan are only a part of the area covered by the U.S. federal jurisdiction. DoD is a department of the U.S. federal government with facilities, personnel, and materials in many areas around the globe. This plan only covers those DoD elements which are within the region or which are either entering or departing the region. The preparers of the RBP have agreed that the task at hand was not to write a biosecurity plan for the region per se, but rather to serve as compilers, editors, and synthesizers working to produce a regional biosecurity strategy from the input of experts and stakeholders from throughout the region as well as supplementing this core input with additional material from experts from beyond the region as appropriate. Ultimately, what the reader of this document will find is what local, regional, and global experts and stakeholders have suggested should be included in this document. Some jurisdictions provided much more input than others. It is hoped that the information provided in this plan will assist each and every jurisdiction as well as the region in moving forward with improving biosecurity across the board (within jurisdictions, between jurisdictions, and for the region, as well as for linkages outside the region). This plan was drafted and developed with the intention that it should remain a living document and that once the final product has been delivered to the jurisdictions, the jurisdictions themselves would v determine how best to move forward with recommendations, implementation, and updating their elements of the plan as needed in order to insure that it remains current and ultimately functional. It is hoped that updates both in regards to advancements towards meeting specific recommendations as well as to the plan itself will be shared between jurisdictions and supported by the region, ultimately ensuring that the plan remains a regional concept with a regional focus but driven by the individual jurisdictions via regional agreements and continued planning, development, and implementation. vi 2. Mission Statement The concept of the RBP is visionary in its scope. The transfer of invasive species or invasive alien species (IAS) to the region and within the region is real, ongoing, and an increasing problem that must be addressed. The spatial scale for this plan is extremely broad, encompassing most of Micronesia and the archipelago of Hawaii. The plan attempts to cover the broadest possible extent of habitats and taxonomic groups including terrestrial, freshwater, and marine systems. This overall approach is unprecedented due to the broad geographic and taxonomic scope, as well as inclusion of multiple countries and cultures. The primary entities covered by the RBP are listed below. These entities are often referred to as jurisdictions within the RBP, as most of them are government jurisdictions. The U.S. Federal Government, as it relates to its jurisdictions within the region The U.S. Territory of Guam, commonly referred to as Guam The U.S. Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands or CNMI The U.S. state of Hawaii, commonly referred to as Hawaii The Federated States of Micronesia or FSM The FSM state of Chuuk The FSM state of Kosrae The FSM state of Pohnpei The FSM state of Yap The Republic of Palau, commonly referred to as Palau The Republic of the Marshall Islands or RMI The DoD The approach used to develop the RBP explicitly considers multiple vectors and environments (marine, freshwater, and terrestrial systems) together, using an appropriate spatial scale at which invasions operate. The implementation of this large-scale, integrative, and cross-cutting strategy should result in improved biosecurity protection, efficiency, and consistency, compared to advancing many individual activities in isolation. By cross-cutting we refer to the fact that invasive species negatively affect most major concerns within the region such as climate change adaptation, human health, green economy development, natural resources conservation, economic stability and growth, food security, etc. and that by addressing invasive species via appropriate biosecurity we are in fact positively affecting all of vii these major concerns. The implementation guidance within the RBP supports establishment of a coordinated and consistent strategy internationally, across multiple countries and cultures. Most current understanding and management of invasions come from temperate latitudes and continents, but this plan aims to address invasions on tropical islands ecosystems. Even though Micronesia and Hawaii encompass a large area including multiple countries, current levels of trade and the number of points of entry are few relative to many other global
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mangroves Occurring on the Many Islands in the South Pacific Are Only a Small Component When Compared to the Worldwide Inventory of Mangroves
    TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT AND SUPPORT FOR MANGROVE AND LITTORAL FOREST MANAGEMENT, PLANNING AND TRAINING FOR SMALL ISLANDS IN THE SOUTH PACIFIC Jan. 25, 2004 by James Denny Ward USDA Forest Service i FOREWORD Mangroves occurring on the many islands in the South Pacific are only a small component when compared to the worldwide inventory of mangroves. Although the mangroves found on the smaller islands may not seem as important on the global scale, they are extremely important to the small individual countries. Some of their benefits include shoreline protection, biodiversity, fisheries and a source for traditional products like building material, fuelwood and various cultural uses. These benefits are even more important to small island countries with limited resources and contributed to the survival of the indigenous people in earlier times. Realizing the importance of the mangrove resource the Forest & Trees Support Programme of SPC and the Heads of Forestry in the Pacific in cooperation with the USDA Forest Service conducted several missions during the last 10 years to assist the smaller island countries with preserving, protecting and managing their mangroves . The USDA Forest Service’s Institute of Pacific Islands Forestry based in Hawaii has been providing assistance to the Federated States of Micronesia and other islands with close ties to the United States for several years. Research conducted by this group has contributed greatly to the information base needed to manage mangroves throughout the South Pacific. This report is not all-inclusive but it is hoped that it will contain sufficient information to assist small islands in developing a management strategy for their individual countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Reptiles, Birds, and Mammals of Pakin Atoll, Eastern Caroline Islands
    Micronesica 29(1): 37-48 , 1996 Reptiles, Birds, and Mammals of Pakin Atoll, Eastern Caroline Islands DONALD W. BUDEN Division Mathematics of and Science, College of Micronesia, P. 0 . Box 159 Kolonia, Polmpei, Federated States of Micronesia 96941. Abstract-Fifteen species of reptiles, 18 birds, and five mammals are recorded from Pakin Atoll. None is endemic to Pakin and all of the residents tend to be widely distributed throughout Micronesia. Intro­ duced species include four mammals (Rattus exulans, Canis fami/iaris, Fe/is catus, Sus scrofa), the Red Junglefowl (Gallus gal/us) among birds, and at least one lizard (Varanus indicus). Of the 17 indigenous birds, ten are presumed or documented breeding residents, including four land birds, a heron, and five terns. The Micronesian Honeyeater (My=omela rubratra) is the most common land bird, followed closely by the Micro­ nesian Starling (Aplonis opaca). The vegetation is mainly Cocos forest, considerably modified by periodic cutting of the undergrowth, deliber­ ately set fires, and the rooting of pigs. Most of the present vertebrate species do not appear to be seriously endangered by present levels of human activity. But the Micronesian Pigeon (Ducula oceanica) is less numerous on the settled islands, probably reflecting increased hunting pressure, and sea turtles (especially Chelonia mydas) and their eggs are harvested indiscriminately . Introduction Terrestrial vertebrates have been poorly studied on many of the remote atolls of Micronesia, and distributional records are lacking or scanty for many islands. The present study documents the occurrence and relative abundance of reptiles, birds, and mammals on Pakin Atoll for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Leadership in the Constitution of the Marshall Islands
    TRADITIONAL LEADERSHIP IN THE CONSTITUTION OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS by C. J. LYNCH Working Papers Series Pacific Islands Studies Center for Asian and Pacific Studies in collaboration with the Social Science Research Institute University of Hawaii at Manoa Honolulu, Hawaii Joe Lynch is a consultant on legislation and constitutional drafting whose long experience in the Pacific encompasses island areas in Micronesia, Melanesia, and Polynesia. Robert C. Kiste, Director Pacific Islands Studies Program Center for Asian and Pacific Studies University of Hawaii at Manoa Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 TRADITIONAL LEADERSHIP IN THE CONSTITUTION OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS (With Comparative Notes) C. J. Lynch 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface v Introductory 1 Part I. THE COUNCIL OF IROIJ l. The precursors 3 2. Functions of the Council 4 (a) General 4 (b) Relations with the Nitijela 6 ( c) The Council in action 9 3. Composition of the Council 10 4. Procedures of the Council 13 5. Miscellaneous matters 14 6. Comparisons 16 (a) Palau 16 (b) The Federated States of Micronesia 17 (c) Yap 18 (d) Vanuatu 21 (e) Western Samoa 22 (f) The Cook Islands 22 (g) Comment 24 Part II. THE TRADITIONAL RIGHTS COURT 7. The Traditional Rights Court and the judicial system 27 ADDENDUM: Two problems of interpretation 8. Comparisons and comment 34 Part III. CONCLUSION 9. General comments 35 10. Is a traditional input desirable? 37 APPENDIX 42 NOTES 43 iii PREFACE It hardly needs to be said that this paper is written by a lawyer and from a lawyer's point of view. This fact, however , necessarily means that it is selective, firstly in the aspects of its subject that are considered and secondly in the detail (especially on non-legal aspects) into which it goes.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Island Countries and Territories Issued: 19 February 2008
    OCHA Regional Office for Asia Pacific Pacific Island Countries and Territories Issued: 19 February 2008 OCHA Presence in the Pacific Northern Papua New Guinea Fiji Mariana Humanitarian Affairs Unit (HAU), PNG Regional Disaster Response Islands (U.S.) UN House , Level 14, DeloitteTower, Advisor (RDRA), Fiji Douglas Street, PO Box 1041, 360 Victoria Parade, 3rd Floor Fiji +10 Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea Development Bank Building, Suva, FIJI Tel: +675 321 2877 Tel: +679 331 6760, +679 331 6761 International Date Line Fax: +675 321 1224 Fax: +679 330 9762 Saipan Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Head: Vini Talai Head: Peter Muller Agana +12 Guam (U.S.) Pacific Ocean +10 MARSHALL ISLANDS Legend Depth (m) OCHA Presence Below 5,000 1,001 to 2,000 MICRONESIA (FSO) Koror Majuro Country capital Palikir 4,001 to 5,000 501 to 1,000 Territory capital PALAU +11 Illustrative boundary 3,001 to 4,000 101 to 500 +9 +10 Time difference with UTC 2,001 to 3,000 o to 100 Tarawa (New York: UTC -5 Equator NAURU Geneva: UTC +1) IMPORTANT NOTE: The boundaries on this map are for illustrative purposes only Yaren Naming Convention and were derived from the map ’The +12 +12 KIRIBATI UN MEMBER STATE Pacific Islands’ published in 2004 by the Territory or Associated State Secretariat of the Pacific Community. INDONESIA TUVALU -11 -10 PAPUA NEW GUINEA United Nations Office for the Coordination +10 +12 of Humanitarian affairs (OCHA) Funafuti Toke lau (N.Z.) Regional Office for Asia Pacific (ROAP) Honiara Executive Suite, 2nd Floor, -10 UNCC Building,
    [Show full text]
  • Skills Training and Vocational Education Project
    Completion Report Project Number: 33166 Loan Number: 1791 November 2006 The Marshall Islands: Skills Training and Vocational Education Project Asian Development Bank CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS The currency unit of the Republic of the Marshall Islands is the US dollar. ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank CMI – College of the Marshall Islands EA – executing agency IDMP – Infrastructure Development and Maintenance Project JHS – Jaluit High School MIA – Ministry of Internal Affairs MIHS – Marshall Islands High School (Majuro) MIS – management information system MOE – Ministry of Education NGO – nongovernment organization NIHS – Northern Islands High School (Wotje) NTC – National Training Council NVTI – National Vocational Training Institute PIU – project implementation unit PSC – project steering committee RMI – Republic of the Marshall Islands SDR – special drawing rights SEG – supplementary education grant TA – technical assistance TOR – terms of reference WAM – Waan Aelon in Majel WIA – Work Investment Act WIB – Work Investment Board WTMIC – Women’s Training and Marketing Center NOTES (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government ends on 30 September. FY before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends. (ii) In this report, “$” refers to US dollars. Vice President C.L. Greenwood, Operations 2 Director General P. Erquiaga, Pacific Department Director I. Bhushan, Area B, Pacific Department Team leader S. Pollard, Principal Programs Coordination Specialist, Pacific Department Team member J. Sarvi, Principal Education Specialist, Pacific Department A. Salvador, Associate Project Analyst, Pacific Department CONTENTS Page BASIC DATA i I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 II. EVALUATION OF DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION 1 A. Relevance of Design and Formulation 1 B. Project Outputs 2 C. Project Cost and Financial Plan 8 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Seagrass Distribution and Diversity: a Bioregional Model ⁎ F
    Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350 (2007) 3–20 www.elsevier.com/locate/jembe Global seagrass distribution and diversity: A bioregional model ⁎ F. Short a, , T. Carruthers b, W. Dennison b, M. Waycott c a Department of Natural Resources, University of New Hampshire, Jackson Estuarine Laboratory, Durham, NH 03824, USA b Integration and Application Network, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Cambridge, MD 21613, USA c School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, 4811 Queensland, Australia Received 1 February 2007; received in revised form 31 May 2007; accepted 4 June 2007 Abstract Seagrasses, marine flowering plants, are widely distributed along temperate and tropical coastlines of the world. Seagrasses have key ecological roles in coastal ecosystems and can form extensive meadows supporting high biodiversity. The global species diversity of seagrasses is low (b60 species), but species can have ranges that extend for thousands of kilometers of coastline. Seagrass bioregions are defined here, based on species assemblages, species distributional ranges, and tropical and temperate influences. Six global bioregions are presented: four temperate and two tropical. The temperate bioregions include the Temperate North Atlantic, the Temperate North Pacific, the Mediterranean, and the Temperate Southern Oceans. The Temperate North Atlantic has low seagrass diversity, the major species being Zostera marina, typically occurring in estuaries and lagoons. The Temperate North Pacific has high seagrass diversity with Zostera spp. in estuaries and lagoons as well as Phyllospadix spp. in the surf zone. The Mediterranean region has clear water with vast meadows of moderate diversity of both temperate and tropical seagrasses, dominated by deep-growing Posidonia oceanica.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Army Garrison- Kwajalein Atoll Information Handbook
    United States Army Garrison- Kwajalein Atoll Information Handbook Produced by DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC Last updated: 4 September 2019 U.S. ARMY GARRISON KWAJALEIN ATOLL/ REAGAN TEST SITE U.S. ARMY INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT COMMAND KWAJALEIN ATOLL, MARSHALL ISLANDS I. INSTALLATION DATA Name of Site: The installation is currently called “United States Army Garrison - Kwajalein Atoll/ Ronald Reagan Ballistic Missile Defense Test Site” (USAG-KA/RTS) effective 01 October 2013. The installation has undergone multiple name changes since its inception: U.S. Army Kwajalein Atoll/ Ronald Reagan Ballistic Missile Defense Test Site (USAKA/RTS) from 15 June 2001 to 01 October 2013; U.S. Army Kwajalein Atoll/ Kwajalein Missile Range (USAKA/KMR) from 01 March 1998 to 15 June 2001; U.S. Army Kwajalein Atoll (USAKA) from 14 November 1986 to 30 September 1997; Kwajalein Missile Range (KMR) from 15 April 1968 to 13 November 1986; Kwajalein Test Site from 1 July 1964 to 14 April 1968. Between 1945 and 30 June 1964, while under the command of the United States Navy, the installation was referred to at various times as the Navy Operating Base Kwajalein, Naval Air Station Kwajalein, Naval Station Kwajalein and Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF) Kwajalein. Site Number: NQ100 [for Military Real Property Inventory purposes, assigned by the U.S. Army Chief of Engineers per paragraph 2.2.1 (3) of AR 405-45] U.S. Mail Address: PSC 701-PO Box 26, APO AP 96555-0001 Status: USAG-KA/RTS is a Class II site (Active) of the United States Army and is designated a subordinate activity of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • IOM Micronesia
    IOM Micronesia Federated States of Micronesia Republic of the Marshall Islands Republic of Palau Newsletter, July 2018 - April 2019 IOM staff Nathan Glancy inspects a damaged house in Chuuk during the JDA. Credit: USAID, 2019 Typhoon Wutip Destruction Typhoon Wutip passed over Pohnpei, Chuuk, and Yap States, FSM between 19 and 22 February with winds of 75–80 mph and gusts of up to 100 mph. Wutip hit the outer islands of Chuuk State, including the ‘Northwest’ islands (Houk, Poluwat, Polap, Tamatam and Onoun) and the ‘Lower and ‘Middle’ Mortlocks islands, as well as the outer islands of Yap (Elato, Fechailap, Lamotrek, Piig and Satawal) before continuing southwest of Guam and slowly dissipating by the end of February. FSM President, H.E. Peter M. Christian issued a Declaration of Disaster on March 11 and requested international assistance to respond to the damage caused by the typhoon. Consistent with the USAID/FEMA Operational Blueprint for Disaster Relief and Reconstruction in the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) and the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI), a Joint Damage Assessment (JDA) was carried out by representatives of USAID, OFDA, FEMA and the Government of FSM from 18 March to 4 April, with assistance from IOM. The JDA assessed whether Wutip damage qualifies for a US Presidential Disaster Declaration. The JDA found Wutip had caused damage to the infrastructure and agricultural production of 30 islands, The path of Typhoon Wutip Feb 19-22, 2019. Credit: US JDA, 2019. leaving 11,575 persons food insecure. Response to Typhoon Wutip IOM, with the support of USAID/OFDA, has responded with continued distributions of relief items stored in IOM warehouses such as tarps, rope and reverse osmosis (RO) units to affected communities on the outer islands of Chuuk, Yap and Pohnpei states.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study GREEN CLIMATE FUND FUNDING PROPOSAL I
    Annex II – Feasibility Study GREEN CLIMATE FUND FUNDING PROPOSAL I FEASIBILITY STUDY Addressing Climate Vulnerability In the Water Sector (ACWA) United Nations Development Programme UNDP On behalf of Government of the Republic of the Marshall Islands RMI March 2018 For Submission to the Green Climate Fund EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) is a small island developing states (SIDS) consisting of 29 coral atolls and 5 single islands. The nation is a large-ocean state, with approximately 1,225 islands and islets with a total land area of only 182 km2, spread across over 2 million km2 of vast ocean space. Most of the 24 inhabited local government jurisdictions (atolls and islands) are remote and lie merely 2 meters above sea level on average, posing various challenges and risks to sustainable development in face of climate change. RMI’s population in 2017 is estimated as 55,5621, most of which is concentrated in urban atolls of Majuro and Kwajalein (Ebeye)2. Context Climate Change: It is predicted, that RMI will face increasing sea level rise, increasing rainfall variability with potential for extended drought periods and increasing storm surges with climate change3, further aggravating RMI’s vulnerability and more specifically sustainable water supply. These climate change impacts are likely to exacerbate the risks of water shortages in RMI, by further challenging the ability of the Marshallese people to have access to safe freshwater resources year-round. Droughts and storm waves are some of the key climate based events that impact RMI. Climate projections show that in the next twenty-five years, rainfall and drought scenarios in RMI will continue and may increase in the short term4.
    [Show full text]
  • FEDERATED STATES of MICRONESIA: Preliminary Damage Assessment
    FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONEISA: Preliminary Damage Assessment (PDA) High Tide Event, December 7-12, 2008 Report Submitted By Marilyn Shigetani PDA Team Leader (1/26/2009) 1 1. Background: I. Precipitators According to the National Weather Service, in early December 2008 a vigorous low pressure system formed north of Wake Island. Surface reports indicated a large area of 50 to 60kt surface winds formed along the low pressure’s northern periphery while it moved slowly towards the southeast to near 20N 174E by Sunday December 7, 2008. Surface winds weakened slightly, but remained at gale force, 35-40kt, by Tuesday, December 9, 2008. At the same time the moon’s orbit with the earth was approaching its closest point (perigee) causing unusually high tides. Reports from Altimetry showed significant wave heights in excess of 30ft near the low pressure system generating northerly swells in the range of 12-15ft from Majuro westward to Pohnpei and Chuuk. The combination of these factors resulted in high wave and tide events throughout the FSM. II. Evolution of PDA Request Beginning on December 7, 2008 and concluding on December 12, 2008, a tidal event swept over the Federated States of Micronesia, causing damage to crops and coastal areas throughout the country. In response to this incident the Governor of Pohnpei State, John Ehsa, declared the islands of Kapingamarangi, Mwokil, Ngetik, Nukuror, Oroluk, Pakin and Pingelap to be in State of Emergency on December 19, 2008. On December 24, 2008, Governor Robert Weilbacher of the State of Kosrae declared the existence of a state of emergency because of tidal surges that caused property flooding, damage and destruction of households, businesses, infrastructure and crops.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Yearbook, 2017
    REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS STATISTICAL YEAR BOOK 2017 Economic Policy, Planning and Statistics Office (EPPSO) Office of the President Republic of the Marshall Islands RMI Statistical Yearbook, 2017 Statistical Yearbook 2017 Published by: Economic Policy, Planning and Statistics Office (EPPSO), Office of the President, Republic of the Marshall Islands Publication Year: June, 2018 Technical support was provided by Inclusive Growth Thematic cluster, UNDP, Pacific Office, Suva, Fiji Disclaimer The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the UNDP or EPPSO. The pictures used in this publication are mostly taken from the Google search and some from the respective organization’s websites. EPPSO is not responsible if there is any violation of “copy right” issue related with any of them. 1 RMI Statistical Yearbook, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ...................................................................................................................................... 5 FOREWORD .................................................................................................................................. 6 LIST OF ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................................... 7 SUGGESTED NOTES PRIOR TO READING THIS PUBLICATION .......................................................... 10 BRIEF HISTORY OF REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS ............................................................. 12 REPUBLIC
    [Show full text]
  • Orange Spiny Whitefly, Aleurocanthus Spiniferus (Quaintance) (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)1 Jamba Gyeltshen, Amanda Hodges, and Greg S
    EENY341 Orange Spiny Whitefly, Aleurocanthus spiniferus (Quaintance) (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)1 Jamba Gyeltshen, Amanda Hodges, and Greg S. Hodges2 Introduction Africa (Van den Berg et al. 1990). More recently, orange spiny whitefly was reported from Italy (2008), Croatia Orange spiny whitefly, Aleurocanthus spiniferus Quaintance, (2012), and Montenegro (2013) (Radonjic et al. 2014). is a native pest of citrus in tropical Asia. In the early 1920s, Established populations of orange spiny whitefly are not yet pest outbreak infestation levels caused Japan to begin a known to occur in the continental US. biological control program. Primarily, orange spiny whitefly affects host plants by sucking the sap but it also causes indirect damage by producing honeydew and subsequently Description and Life History promoting the growth of sooty mold. Sooty mold is a Whiteflies have six developmental stages: egg, crawler (1st black fungus that grows on honeydew. Heavy infestations instar), two sessile nymphal instars (2nd and 3rd instars), of orange spiny whitefly, or other honeydew-producing the pupa (4th instar), and adult. Identification of the insects such as scales, mealybugs, aphids, and other whitefly Aleyrodidae is largely based upon characters found in the species, can cause sooty mold to completely cover the leaf pupal (4th instar) stage. The duration of the life cycle and surface and negatively affect photosynthesis. the number of generations per year are greatly influenced by the prevailing climate. A mild temperature with high Distribution relative humidity provides ideal conditions for growth and development. About four generations per year have The orange spiny whitefly has spread to Africa, Australia, been recorded in Japan (Kuwana et al.
    [Show full text]