DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Nevada Test Site and Off

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Nevada Test Site and Off I -1 _-- I i Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Nevada Test Site and Off-Site Locations in the State of Nevada Volume 1 Appendix I U.S. Department of Energy Nevada Operations Office Las Vegas, Nevada NEVADA TEST SITE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS ....................................................................... iv . SUMMARY ....................................................................... S-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose and Scope ...................................................... 1-1 1.2 Background'Information ................................................. 1-5 1.3 Summary of Results .................................................... 1-6 1.3.1 Defense Programs ............................................... 1-6 1.3.2 Waste Management Program ...................................... 1-6 1.4 Conclusions .......................................................... 1-7 2.0 ' PUBLIC ISSUES .... ....................................................... 2-1 2.1 Public Involvement.. .................................................... 2-1 2.2 Stakeholder Issues ...................................................... 2-7 2.2.1 Transportation Management Operations .............................. 2-7 . I 2.2.2 Local Segments of Concern ....................................... 2-8 I 2.2.3 Routing ...................................................... 2-11 I 1 2.2.4 Rail Option ................................................... 2-11 2.2.5 Health Risks .................................................. 2-12 I 2.2.6 Transportation Protocol Working Group Recommendations ............. 2-12 2.3 American Indian Issues ................................................ 2-16 2.4 Conclusions .......................................................... 2-16 ! 3.0 TRANSPORTATION RISK .................................................... 3-1 3.1 General Information .................................................... 3-1 3.2 Defense Programs Transportation Risk Analysis ............................. 3-2 3.2.1 Defense Programs Transportation Risk Methodology and Data ........... 3-2 1 3.2.2 Defense Programs Transportation Risk System Description .............. 3-4 3.2.3 Defense Programs Transportation Risk Results ........................ 3-5 3.2.4 Defense Programs Transportation Risk Conclusions .................... 3-5 3.3 Waste Management Activities Transportation Risk ........................... 3-5 3.3.1 Methodology .................................................... 3-5 3.3.2 System Description .............................................. 3-8 3.3.3 Datavalues ................................................... 3-22 3.4 Hazardous Materials Shipments Transportation Risk ......................... 3-32 3.5 Summary ........................................................... 3-35 4.0 REFERENCES' .............................................................. 4-1 I 1 NEVADA TEST SITE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Attach men ts A . Applicable Federal. State. and Local Laws and Regulations ......................... A- 1 B . Procedures and Regulations Relating to Transportation of Hazardous Materials .......... B- 1 C . Public Participation in the Transportation Study ................................... c-1 D . Emergency Response Procedures and Training ................................... D- 1 E . Nevada Test Site Rail Access Study ............................................ E- 1 F . National Generator Routes ................................................... F- 1 List of Figures Figure 1-1 NTS EIS Transportation Study Waste Generator Locations ................. 1-3 Figure 1-2 NTSMap ........................................................ 1-4 Figure 3- 1 National Interstate System ............................................ 3-13 Figure 3-2 NV- 1. Eastern Route 7 ................. ; ............................ 3-15 Figure 3-3 NV.2. Eastern Route 8 ............................................... 3-16 Figure 3-4 . NV.3. Northern Route 5 ............................................. 3-17 Figure 3-5 NV.4. Eastern Route 9 .............................................. 3-18 Figure 3-6 NV.5. Eastern Route 10 ............................................. 3-19 Figure 3-7 NV.6. Southern Route 6 ............................................. 3-20 Figure 3-8 NV.7. Southern Route 8 ............................................. 3-21 Figure 3-9 NV.8. Southern Route 1 ............................................. 3-23 Figure 3-10 NV.9. Southern Route 2 ............................................. 3-24 Figure 3-1 1 NV- 10. Southern Route 5 ............................................ 3-25 Figure 3- I2 Nevada In-State Traffic Fatality Risk ................................... 3-28 Figure 3-13 Nevada In-State Traffic Injury Risk .................................... 3-28 Figure 3-14 Nevada In-State Incident-Free Radiation-Induced Cancer Fatality Risk ........ 3-29 Figure 3-15 Nevada In-State Radiation-Induced Cancer Fatality Risk Due to Accidents ..... 3-29 Figure 3- 1 6 Nevada In-State Incident-Free Radiation Induced Detriment Risk ............ 3-30 Figure 3-17 Nevada In-State Radiation-Induced Detriment Risk Due to Accidents ......... 3-30 Figure 3-18 Nevada In-State Chemical-Induced Cancer Risk .......................... 3-31 Figure 3-19 Nevada In-State Chemical-InducedNoncancer Hazard Index ................ 3-31 List of Tables Table 2-1 Transportation meetings held on the NTS EIS Transportation Study .............. 2.2 Table 2-2 Results of Transportation Protocol Working Group Issue Ranking ...............2-8 Table 3-1 Defense Programs Transportation Risk for Alternative 1...................... 3-6 Table 3-2 Defense Programs Transportation Risk for Alternative 3 ....................... 3-6 Table 3-3 Comparison of Defense Programs Transportation Risk Between Alternative 1 and Alternative 3 ........................................... 3-6 Table 3-4 Low-Level Waste and Mixed Waste Volumes and Shipments for Alternative ......3-10 Table 3-5 Low-Level Waste Volumes and Shipments for Alternative 1 ................... 3-11 Table 3-6 Mixed Waste Volume and Shipments for Alternative 3 ....................... 3-12 Volume 1. Appendix I ii NEVADA TEST SITE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) List of Tables (continued) Table 3-7 Expected Number of Occurrences in 10 years (National Route) . , . .3-32 Table 3-8 Expected Number of Occurrences in 10 years (within Nevada) . : . 3-32 Table 3-9 On-site Transportation Risk for NTS-Generated Waste , . , . 3-34 I iii Volume 1, Appendix I NEVADA TEST SITE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ACRONYMS ATEST Armored TractodSafe-Secure Trailer ac acres ADROIT Potential risk associated with Defense Programs Transportation Activities ANL-E Argonne National Laboratory - East BAPL Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory Bq Becquerel CGTO Consolidated Group of Tribes and Organizations dBa a weighted decibel DoD U.S. Department of Defense DOE U.S. Department of Energy DOEN U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office E1 S Environmental Impact Statement EM Emergency Materials EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency FEMP Fernald Environmental Management Project . FORTRAN A computer programming language for problems that can be addressed in algebraic terms g gram Hz hertz HIGHWAY A computer program used for evaluating routes for transporting hazardous materials in the United States hourslyr hours per year INEL Idaho National Engineering Laboratory KAPL Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory km kilometer . LANL Los Alamos National Laboratory LCF Latent cancer fatality LLNL Lawrence Livennore National Laboratory LLW Low-Level Waste m2 square meters m3 cubic meters ERPG Emergency response planning guidelines m meter mi mile Yd yard NAFR Complex Nellis Air Force Range Volume 1, Appendix I iv NEVADA TEST SITE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ACRONYMS (continued) nCi nanocurie NTS Nevada Test Site PSC Public Service Commission ORNL Oak Ridge National Laboratory PEIS Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement PORTS Portsmouth Gaseous Difision Plant WETS Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site SLAC Stanford Linear Accelerator Spaghetti Bowl U.S. 15/95 Interchange in Las Vegas SRS Savannah River Site RADTRAN A computer code combining user-determined meteorological, demographic, transportation, packaging, and material factors with health physics data to calculate the expected radiological consequences and accident risk of transporting radioactive materials voc Volatile Organic Compound V Volume 1, Appendix I NEVADA TEST SITE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT This Page Intentionally Left Blank Volume 1, Appendix I vi / 'I NEVADA TEST SITE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT SUMMARY This report has been prepared to address local people who reside along three of the primary transportation issues concerning current and routes previously evaluated for risk in the NTS potential operations at the Nevada Test Site (NTS), EIS. The DOE is committed to having the study to document the results of the NTS transportation reflect the full range of American Indian options. risk analysis, and to provide information and supporting documentation for the Environmental As part of its mission related to Defense Program, Impact Statement (EIS) for the NTS and Off-Site the DOE maintains and operates a special fleet of Locations in the State of Nevada. Four alternatives trucks and trailers used to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CHICAGO PREMIUM OUTLETS 1650 Premium Outlets Boulevard | Aurora, IL 60504
    CHICAGO PREMIUM OUTLETS 1650 Premium Outlets Boulevard | Aurora, IL 60504 SEMI-IMPROVED PADS AVAILABLE FOR SALE OR LEASE A. RICK SCARDINO Principal [email protected] 773.355.3040 All information furnished regarding property for sale, rental or financing is from sources deemed reliable, but no warranty or representation is made to the accuracy thereof and same is submitted to errors, omissions, change of price, rental or other conditions prior to sale, lease or financing or withdrawal without notice. No liability of any kind is to be imposed on the broker herein. 9450 West Bryn Mawr Avenue | Suite 550 | Rosemont, IL 60018 | 773.355.3000 (main) | www.lee-associates.com CHICAGO PREMIUM OUTLETS Semi-Improved Pads Available for Sale or Lease PROPERTY OVERVIEW HIGHLIGHTS: OPPORTUNITY IDENTIFICATION: • 687,000 SF Premium Outlet Center with Over 170 Stores • Semi-Improved Pads with Interstate 88 Visibility Available Surrounded by Strong Demographics • Pads are Situated at the Southeast Corner of the Property • Opened in May 2004 and was Expanded in August 2015 and Near Large Parking Fields • Chicago Premium Outlets is One of the Top Performing • Ideal for a Hotel, Full Service Restaurant, Retail, or Outlet Centers in the U.S. with 6,000,000 Annual Visitors Entertainment Users • The City of Aurora, with a Population of More Than TRAFFIC COUNTS: 199,000, is the Second Largest City in Illinois • Interstate 88 (Chicago-Kansas City Expressway): 94,000 VPD • Other Local Attractions Include Hollywood Casino, Paramount Theatre, and Two Brothers
    [Show full text]
  • Gilman Industrial Park Brochure
    Illinois Gilman has an available 265 acre park waiting for you! o'Crossroadsof Opportunity" Location-Location-Location This 265 acre industrial park 90 miles south of Chicago is ideally located at the intersections of Interstate 57 US 24 and US 45. It is also bordered by the main lines for the TP&W (SantaFe) and Illinois Cenfal (CN) Railroads. The infrasffucture available is extensive. The property can be divided into lots to suit individual usersneeds. Shawn Coady Rick Theesfeld 204 N. Rt s4lP.O.Box98 215N. Central RobertsoIllinois 60962 Gilman, Illinois 60938 217-395-2281, 8t5-265-42t3 217-395-2572(Bax) 815-265-4640(Fax) INFRASTRUCTURE THAT IS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE OR SCHEDULED/SPRING 2OO4 COMPLETED . 400,000 gallon vertical water storagetank on . Site Survey site . Topographicalmaps . Looped 12" x S" watermains in park . Illinois historical survey . 8" municipal sanitary sewer system . PhaseI Environmental . Two electrical serviceproviders with . Wetlands survey extensiveinfrastructure availablein the park . Drainage plans . 138 KV overhead . 69 KV overhead ECONOMIC INCENTIVES . 12 KV overhead . Substationlocated in the park Tax Increment Finance District Iroquois DevelopmentCouncil 8" natural gas service Local city incentives City streetaccess to the park 3 lane,concrete,40 foot curb and gutter RAIL SERVICE Lishted streetentrance . Illinois Central (CN) main line . Illinois Central (CN) Springfield line INTERSTATEACCESS . TP&W (SantaFe) , I-57,US-24, US-45 border the site . Switching yard in Gilman ELECTRIC WASTEWATER WATER AverageLoad Supplier 250,000gallons per Ameren CIPS day City of Gilman . 13,700MW Generation Design Capacity Source Capacity 500,000gallons per day 2DeepWells . Multiple interconnections Tlpe of Plant . ElevatedStorage Capacity Substationon site Primary .
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) 2040
    Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) 2040 4.1 Roads and Highways Element The largest part of the transportation system is a roadway network of more than 7,000 lane miles and is comprised of NCDOT maintained roads, locally maintained roads, and private roads. In late 2013 the metropolitan area boundary for the High Point MPO increased in size to include the remaining portion of Davidson County not already included in an MPO. This substantially expanded the roadway network for the MPO. Radial movements that are strongest in the MPO are: • Towards Greensboro and Jamestown to the northeast, • Towards Winston-Salem from High Point to the northwest via Interstate 74, • Towards the Piedmont Triad International Airport to the north via NC 68, • Towards Lexington from High Point to the southwest via Interstate 85 and US 29/70, and • Towards Winston-Salem from Lexington via US 52. • There is some radial demand between High Point, Thomasville, Archdale, Trinity, and Wallburg. Heavily traveled routes include: • Eastchester Drive (NC 68), towards Piedmont Triad International Airport • Westchester Drive and National Highway (NC 68), towards Thomasville • NC 109 • Main Street in High Point, • Main Street in Archdale, • US 311 Bypass, • Interstate 85, • US 29-70, • Wendover Avenue, • Main Street and NC 8 in and around Lexington, • High Point - Greensboro Road, and 4.1 Roads and Highways Element • Surrett Drive. Chapter: 1 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) 2040 The projects in the Roadway Element of the Transportation Plan come from the Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) for the High Point Urbanized Area. The differences between the Roadway Element of the MTP and the CTP include: • The MTP is required by Federal Law, CTP is mandated by the North Carolina Department of Transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportationtransportation
    Transportationtransportation City of Elmhurst Comprehensive Plan TransporTATion Elmhurst’s transportation system consists of an extensive roadway network, including direct access to Interstate High- ways I-290, I-294, and I-88, an extensive commuter rail and bus transit system, as well as a well-connected pedestrian and bike network. This transportation network allows for easy and accessible travel within the City and excellent con- nections to the surrounding metropolitan area. Elmhurst’s interstate highway and commuter rail access are among its strongest assets, making it a very desirable community for living and conducting business. Therefore, maintain- ing a well-functioning and efficient transportation system is critical to sustaining the high quality-of-life in the com- munity. A review of existing conditions, including average daily traffic and transit ridership history, formed the basis for the development of the transportation framework and functional street classification. Through this analysis, pri- Commuter and freight rail tracks ority improvement areas were identified, as well as general improvements or suggestions to manage population and employment growth, relative to a functional and efficient 8. Improve wayfinding signage throughout the city to aid transportation system. This section provides an overview pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists in locating and of the transportation network in Elmhurst and offers some accessing key community facilities. recommendations to sustain and strengthen community mobility. Goal 2: Maintain and determine adequate parking facilities to serve land uses throughout the city. Goals AND OBJECTIVES Objectives: Goal 1: Continue to enhance mobility within the City by 1. Actively monitor, manage and address on-street and effectively managing local traffic issues and anticipating the off-street parking needs within the city to ensure ad- impact of future development on current traffic patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide
    Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide A Complete Compendium Of RV Dump Stations Across The USA Publiished By: Covenant Publishing LLC 1201 N Orange St. Suite 7003 Wilmington, DE 19801 Copyrighted Material Copyright 2010 Covenant Publishing. All rights reserved worldwide. Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide Page 2 Contents New Mexico ............................................................... 87 New York .................................................................... 89 Introduction ................................................................. 3 North Carolina ........................................................... 91 Alabama ........................................................................ 5 North Dakota ............................................................. 93 Alaska ............................................................................ 8 Ohio ............................................................................ 95 Arizona ......................................................................... 9 Oklahoma ................................................................... 98 Arkansas ..................................................................... 13 Oregon ...................................................................... 100 California .................................................................... 15 Pennsylvania ............................................................ 104 Colorado ..................................................................... 23 Rhode Island ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Plan Schenectady County, New York
    COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SCHENECTADY COUNTY, NEW YORK April 22, 2021 Town of Duanesburg Comprehensive Plan Town of Duanesburg Vision Statement The Town of Duanesburg is a proud community of strong heritage and rural character. We encourage the preservation of our attractive and cultural landscape. We provide economically vibrant commercial and retail zones, and a variety of quality housing, cultural and recreational options. We are committed to sustaining our valuable economic and natural resources, particularly agricultural land use, open spaces, natural habitats, and fresh watersheds. We support thoughtful growth and development that enable affordable taxes, enhances the character of commercial and residential zones, improves our schools, and provides local business and employment opportunities. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Duanesburg Town Board Roger Tidball, Supervisor John Ganther, Deputy Supervisor and Council Member Francis R. Potter, Council Member Jeff Senecal, Council Member William Wenzel, Council Member Town Planning Board / Comprehensive Plan Update Committee Phill Sexton, Planning Board Chair and Comprehensive Plan Update Chair Jeffery Schmitt, Planning Board Vice Chair John Ganther, Deputy Town Supervisor Elizabeth Novak, Planning Board Member Michael Harris, Planning Board Member Joshua Houghton, Planning Board Member Martin Williams, Planning Board Member Thomas Rulison, Planning Board Member Nelson Gage, Zoning Board Chair Dale Warner, Town Planner and Building Inspector Terresa Bakner, Town Counsel 3 Table of Contents Introduction .........
    [Show full text]
  • Gregor Weichbrodt on the Road 0X0a
    0x0a On the Road Gregor Weichbrodt On the Road Gregor Weichbrodt 0x0a © 2014 Gregor Weichbrodt All rights reserved. www.ggor.de CONTENTS About this book ........................ 5 Chapter 1 ............................... 7 Chapter 2 .............................. 23 Chapter 3 .............................. 41 Chapter 4 .............................. 53 ABOUT THIS BOOK Based on the novel “On the Road” by Jack Kerouac and Google Maps Direction Service. The exact and approximate spots Kerouac traveled and described are taken from the book and parsed by Google Direction Service API. The chapters match those of the original book. Gregor Weichbrodt January 2014 www.ggor.de 7 CHAPTER 1 Head northwest on W 47th St toward 7th Ave. Take the 1st left onto 7th Ave. Turn right onto W 39th St. Take the ramp onto Lincoln Tunnel. Parts of this road are closed Mon–Fri 4:00 – 7:00 pm. Entering New Jersey. Continue onto NJ-495 W. Keep right to continue on NJ-3 W, follow signs for New Jersey 3 W/Garden State Parkway/Secaucus. Take the New Jersey 3 W exit on the left toward Clifton. Merge onto NJ-3 W. Slight right onto the Garden State Pkwy N ramp. Merge onto Garden State Pkwy. Take exit 155P on the left to merge onto NJ-19 N toward I-80/ Paterson. Turn left onto Cianci St. Turn right onto Market St. Head west on Market St toward Washington St. Turn left onto Main St. Turn right onto County Rd 509 S. Take the Interstate 80 E ramp. Merge onto I-80 E. Take exit 62A-62B toward Saddle 9 Brook/Saddle River Rd/Garden State Pkwy.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Classification Update Report for the Pocatello/Chubbuck Urbanized Area
    Functional Classification Update Report For the Pocatello/Chubbuck Urbanized Area Functional Classification Update Report Introduction The Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973 required the use of functional highway classification to update and modify the Federal-aid highway systems by July 1, 1976. This legislative requirement is still effective today. Functional classification is the process by which streets and highways are grouped into classes, or systems, according to the character of service they are intended to provide. The functional classification system recognizes that streets cannot be treated as independent, but rather they are intertwined and should be considered as a whole. Each street has a specific purpose or function. This function can be characterized by the level of access to surrounding properties and the length of the trip on that specific roadway. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) functional classification system for urban areas is divided into urban principal arterials, minor arterial streets, collector streets, and local streets. Principal arterials include interstates, expressways, and principal arterials. Eligibility for Federal Highway Administration funding and to provide design standards and access criteria are two important reasons to classify roadway. The region is served by Interstate 15 (north/South) and Interstate 86 (east/west). While classified within the arterial class, they are designated federally and do not change locally. Interstates will be shown in the functional classification map, but they will not be specifically addressed in this report. Functional Classification Update The Idaho Transportation Department has the primary responsibility for developing and updating a statewide highway functional classification in rural and urban areas to determine the functional usage of the existing roads and streets.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Energy Direct Project Docket No. Pf14-22-000
    NORTHEAST ENERGY DIRECT PROJECT DOCKET NO. PF14-22-000 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT RESOURCE REPORT 10 ALTERNATIVES PUBLIC Submitted by: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. 1001 Louisiana Street Houston, Texas 77002 November 2014 Environmental Report NED Project Resource Report 10 Alternatives 10-i RESOURCE REPORT 10 – ALTERNATIVES SUMMARY OF FILING INFORMATION INFORMATION FOUND IN Address the “no action” alternative (§ 380.12 (l)(1)). Section 10.1 For large Projects, address the effect of energy conservation or Section 10.1.1 energy alternatives to the Project Section 10.1.2 (§ 380.12 (l)(1)). Identify system alternatives considered during the identification of the Project and provide the rationale for rejecting each Section 10.2 alternative (§ 380.12 (l)(1)). Identify major and minor route alternatives considered to avoid impact on sensitive environmental areas (e.g., wetlands, parks, Section 10.3 or residences) and provide sufficient comparative data to justify the selection of the proposed route (§ 380.12 (l)(2)(ii)). Identify alternative sites considered for the location of major new aboveground facilities and provide sufficient comparative Sections 10.4, 10.5, and 10.6 data to justify the selection of the proposed site (§ 380.12 (l)(2)(ii)). November 2014 Environmental Report NED Project Resource Report 10 Alternatives 10-ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 10.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... 10-1 10.1 NO-ACTION ALTERNATIVE ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BRIDGE POINT MELROSE PARK Bridgepmp.Com | Melrose Park, IL
    BRIDGE POINT MELROSE PARK bridgepmp.com | Melrose Park, IL AVAILABLE SPACE Up to 1,539,780 SF # OF BUILDINGS 1 - 3 CLEAR HEIGHT 36' - 40' NEW INFILL DEVELOPMENT O'HARE / WEST COOK SUBMARKET LAND SIZE HIGHLIGHTS 86.63 Acres • High profile location for labor and last mile distribution • Class A buildings with state-of-the-art • Unmatched connectivity to local expressways, specifications DELIVERY DATE intermodal centers, and O'Hare International Airport • Only site in O'Hare / West Cook submarket which • Direct access to Interstate 290 and Interstate 294 can accommodate over 500,000 SF building Q2 2023 • Potential for built-to-suit development with flexibility in • Site offers flexibility to accommodate heavy trailer design and layout parking CHARLIE KENNING BRIAN CARROLL Executive Vice President Senior Vice President [email protected] [email protected] +1 773 304 4117 +1 773 632 1102 CONCEPT PLAN #1 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY 3 Clear Height: 40' 56'-6" Exterior Docks: 130 (expandable to 148) (89) 5 5 70'-0" TRAILER POSITIONS 1 3 1 5 13 15 Drive-In Doors: 4 (65) EXTERIOR DOCKS (9) FUTURE EXTERIOR DOCKS 2 2 22 707,953 SF 60'-0" D.I.D. D.I.D. 1180'-0" Car Parking: 610 stalls 60'-0" 121'-0" 121'-0" 50'-0" 2 0 2 0 50'-0" 1080'-0" 4 0 20 20 40 (20)BAYS @ 54'-0" 10'-0" Trailer Parking: 178 stalls 16'-4" 10'-0" Truck Court: 130' (10) B A Y S @ 48'-0" PROPOSED 2 0 20 40 20 20 Spec Office: To suit 40 480'-0" 600'-0" FACILITY #3 ±707,953 SQ.FT.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Provides Information on EGC ESP Site Location, On-Site
    CHAPTER 2 Site Characteristics This chapter provides information on the EGC ESP Site location, on-site activities and controls, present and projected population distribution, meteorological, hydrological, geological, and seismological characteristics. The purpose of presenting this information is to provide the bases for demonstrating the adequacy of the site characteristics from a site safety viewpoint and to provide input to support environmental characterization. The influence of the EGC ESP site characteristics on the design and operation of a possible future nuclear power facility will be assessed at the construction and operating license (COL) stage pursuant to 10 CFR 52 Subpart C. REV2 2-1 CHAPTER 2 - SITE CHARACTERISTICS SITE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FOR EGC EARLY SITE PERMIT SECTION 2.1 – GEOGRAPHY AND DEMOGRAPHY 2.1 Geography and Demography 2.1.1 Site Location and Description 2.1.1.1 Specification of Location The EGC ESP Facility will be co-located on the property of the existing CPS Facility and its associated 4,895 ac man-made cooling reservoir (Clinton Lake) (CPS, 2002). The EGC ESP Facility will be located approximately 700 ft south of the existing CPS Facility. The CPS Facility lies within Zone 16 of the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates. The exact UTM coordinates for the EGC ESP Facility will depend upon the specific reactor technology selected for deployment and will be finalized at COL. As shown on Figures 1.2-1 and 2.1-1 there is a complex transportation system surrounding the EGC ESP Site. The nearest major highways are Illinois State Routes 54, 10, and 48, all of which cross the CPS Facility property.
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Instructions 1
    Travel Instructions 1 to the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Getting to Campus by Car: We look forward to welcoming you to our campus. The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign is located in the heart of the US; an easy drive from Chicago, St. Louis From the north on Interstate 57: and Indianapolis; and readily accessible by air, rail, and bus. • Drive south on I-57 to I-74. • Drive east on I-74 to the Lincoln Avenue exit. • Take the Lincoln Avenue exit south. Chicago • Drive 1.7 miles until you get to the corner of Lincoln and Green Street. • Turn right on Green Street. Illinois I-57 I-74 From the south on Interstate 57: Urbana- Champaign • Drive north on I-57 to exit 235, the junction with I-72. As you arrive in Champaign, I-72 becomes University Avenue. • Follow University Avenue east through Champaign, into I-74 Urbana, to Lincoln Avenue (about 3.5 miles). Springfield I-72 • Turn right (south) and go six blocks until you get to the Indianapolis corner of Lincoln Avenue and Green Street. I-55 • Turn right on Green Street. I-70 I-70 From the south, and WIllard Airport, on US Route 45: • Drive north on Route 45 (if leaving Willard Airport, turn left off I-57 Airport Road onto Route 45), through the town of Savoy, to Kirby St. Louis Avenue in Champaign. (Route 45 becomes Neil Street.) • Turn right on Kirby Avenue and drive east into Urbana (Kirby becomes Florida Avenue) to Lincoln Avenue (traffic light).
    [Show full text]