DOCSLIB.ORG

Community Profile

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Community Profile Community Profile City of Schenectady Comprehensive Plan 2020 Reinventing the City of Invention Brian U. Stratton Mayor Community Profile Table of Contents Demographic Characteristics ............................................................................................................ 5 Economic Profile ..........................................................................................................................13 Real Estate and Tax Base Analysis .....................................................................................................31 Housing ......................................................................................................................................43 Infrastructure and Transportation.....................................................................................................59 Natural Resources .........................................................................................................................72 Community Character & Historic Preservation......................................................................................76 Recreation ..................................................................................................................................83 Government, Public Safety and Community Institutions..........................................................................90 List of Tables and Figures Tables Table 1: Summary Demographic Table, City of Schenectady ....................................................................... 5 Table 2: Population and Median Income Change, Schenectady County Municipalities .......................................... 6 Table 3: Household Change, City of Schenectady ..................................................................................... 8 Table 4: Race & Hispanic Origin .......................................................................................................... 9 Table 5: Age Distribution, 1990 – 2000, City of Schenectady ....................................................................... 10 Table 6: Educational Attainment Levels, Persons 25+............................................................................... 11 Table 7: Largest Employers in Schenectady County (2006) ......................................................................... 14 Table 8: Household Income and Poverty Rate Comparison.......................................................................... 23 Table 9: Employment by Occupation, City of Schenectady ......................................................................... 24 Table 10: Resident Employment by Industry, 2000 ................................................................................... 24 Table 11: Commuting Patterns (1997) .................................................................................................. 25 Table 12: Industry Mix, City of Schenectady (2002) .................................................................................. 26 Table 13: Retail Trade, City of Schenectady (2002).................................................................................. 28 Table 14: Retail Trade Trends (1992-2002) ............................................................................................ 29 Table 15: Land Use by Property Class................................................................................................... 32 Table 16: Tax Base by Property Class................................................................................................... 33 Table 17: Tax Exemptions by Property Class .......................................................................................... 34 1 Community Profile Table 18: Revenue Distribution by Property Class .................................................................................... 35 Table 19: Taxable Value by Neighborhood ............................................................................................. 36 Table 20: Population of Comparable Cities ............................................................................................ 37 Table 21: Taxable Value of Real Property of Comparable Cities ................................................................. 38 Table 22: Taxes of Comparable Cities ................................................................................................. 39 Table 23: Budget Expenditures of Comparable Cities ................................................................................ 40 Table 24: Per Capita Expenditures of Comparable Cities............................................................................ 41 Table 25: General Housing Characteristics............................................................................................ 43 Table 26: Maximum Homeownership, City of Schenectady.......................................................................... 44 Table 27: For-Sale Housing Trends – City of Schenectady .......................................................................... 48 Table 28: For-Sale Housing Trends – Schenectady County and Capital District Region ........................................ 49 Table 29: Subsidized Housing Inventory ............................................................................................... 51 Table 30: Major Roads in the City of Schenectady.................................................................................... 62 Table 31: CDTA Performance Data ...................................................................................................... 64 Table 32: City-Owned Recreational Facilities – Passive Parks...................................................................... 83 Table 33: City-Owned Recreational Facilities – Active Parks....................................................................... 84 Table 34: Typical Acreage Standards for Public Recreation/Open Space System – City of Schenectady .................... 86 Table 35: Schenectady Crime Statistics ............................................................................................... 91 Table 36: Index Crimes Reported: 2000-2004, City of Schenectady Police Department ....................................... 91 Table 37: Schenectady School District Need by School .............................................................................. 94 Figures Figure 1: Schenectady Population Ranking 7 Figure 2: Schenectady Empire Zone Map 18 Figure 3: Schenectady Renewal Community Map 19 Figure 4: Map of the Mohawk-Hudson Bike-Hike Trail in the City of Schenectady 67 2 Community Profile Overview: Regional Context and Development History This community profile is being prepared as part of the City of Schenectady’s 2020 Comprehensive Plan. The profile provides a snapshot of Schenectady today. It describes a range of conditions, obstacles and trends impacting the City and the rich array of opportunities available to Schenectady in the future. Schenectady’s proud history creates the framework for future growth and development. “The City that lights and hauls the world” was synonymous with economic expansion for decades. Fueled by the growth of the middle class, the city’s neighborhoods, including the GE Realty Plot, Hamilton Hill and others enjoyed high rates of homeownership and vibrant commercial corridors. The community was, and still is, enhanced by the presence of Union College, the Stockade District and other historic and heritage resources unparalleled in the region. Essentially a two-company town for most of its history, Schenectady is distinctly different from its neighbors in the Capital Region. All are industrial cities, but while industry was booming at the confluence of the Mohawk and Hudson Rivers well before the Civil War, Schenectady did not achieve such a standing until the 1880s. The remarkable expansion of the General Electric Company between 1890 and 1920 conferred a unique, twentieth century quality on the physical character of the City, virtually bereft of the dense, attached rows that characterize streetscapes in Albany and Troy. GE brought change to Schenectady at a magnitude few cities ever experience. Known as “the City that lights and hauls the world”, in 1914, more people worked at GE than had lived in the entire city before the company was created. GE’s main plant developed into a mile-square city-within-a-city, and extraordinary demand spurred rapid housing development in adjacent neighborhoods. Although downtown State Street was the “preferred address” for many local businesses, from the elite classicism of Proctor’s Arcade to the streamlined economy of Woolworth’s, more personalized services, such as groceries, bakeries, butcher shops, taverns, and tailor’s shops, could be found on the commercial strips in Schenectady’s proliferating neighborhoods. For decades, GE and ALCO were Schenectady’s two major employers. Through the world wars, the City’s factories were used in the production of heavy military equipment and trains for transport. Following World War II, however, the economic character of the City underwent rapid change. As railroading declined in the U.S., so did the prospects of ALCO, which ceased operations in 1970. General Electric’s gradual decline in Schenectady in the later decades of the 20th century confronted the community with tougher challenges than most cities ever have to face. The transition from a company town, to a city with a diversified economy, strong and productive tax base and vibrant downtown has been an
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Samuel Clemens Carriage House) 351 Farmington Avenue WABS Hartford Hartford County- Connecticut
    MARK TWAIN CARRIAGE HOUSE HABS No. CT-359-A (Samuel Clemens Carriage House) 351 Farmington Avenue WABS Hartford Hartford County- Connecticut WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA REDUCED COPIES OF THE MEASURED DRAWINGS PHOTOGRAPHS Historic American Buildings Survey National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. 20013-7127 m HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY MARK TWAIN CARRIAGE HOUSE HABS NO. CT-359-A Location: Rear of 351 Farmington Avenue, Hartford, Hartford County, Connecticut. USGS Hartford North Quadrangle, Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates; 18.691050.4626060. Present Owner. Occupant. Use: Mark Twain Memorial, the former residence of Samuel Langhorne Clemens (better known as Mark Twain), now a house museum. The carriage house is a mixed-use structure and contains museum offices, conference space, a staff kitchen, a staff library, and storage space. Significance: Completed in 1874, the Mark Twain Carriage House is a multi-purpose barn with a coachman's apartment designed by architects Edward Tuckerman Potter and Alfred H, Thorp as a companion structure to the residence for noted American author and humorist Samuel Clemens and his family. Its massive size and its generous accommodations for the coachman mark this structure as an unusual carriage house among those intended for a single family's use. The building has the wide overhanging eaves and half-timbering typical of the Chalet style popular in the late 19th century for cottages, carriage houses, and gatehouses. The carriage house apartment was
    [Show full text]
  • Niskayuna Town Historian, Denis Brennan
    Schenectady County Historical Society Newsletter Vol. 63, No. 2, Spring 2019 | 518.374.0263 | schenectadyhistorical.org Schenectady's Silent Witness to History By Neil B. Yetwin One of the most enduring and intriguing of Schenectady’s many antiquities is the mounted cannon at the end of North Ferry Street in the Stockade’s Riverside Park. For nearly a century this imposing piece of ordnance has stood watch eastward over the Mohawk River as if expecting momentarily to defend the city against any who threatened the peace and security of its inhabitants. Schenectady historian John J. Birch suggested in 1961 that the cannon’s history is "a mystery which undoubtedly will never be solved." Yet physical clues and scattered anecdotal evidence might shed light upon those mysteries that have shrouded the cannon for more than two centuries and perhaps help restore it to its proper place in Schenectady’s history. It was once assumed that the cannon was cast in bronze, but it is in fact iron, weighing in excess of 2,300 pounds and measuring 7’9” from breech to muzzle. It was once mounted on an oak carriage twice its length (for balance) and fired a solid iron softball-size round shot weighing 9.1 pounds – thus its designation as a nine-pounder. The cannon had two trunnions, cylindrical projections near the barrel’s center allowing it to be easily raised or lowered. Vestiges of those trunnions remain visible, as does the vent or touch-hole above the breech. Cascabel, two handles on which to attach ropes to reduce recoil, once graced its barrel.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Environmental Forest Biology SUNY-ESF
    Department of Environmental and Forest Biology SUNY-ESF Annual Report 2014-2015 Front Cover: Images for collage by EFB faculty, staff, and students Department of Environmental and Forest Biology Annual Report Summer 2014 Academic Year 2014 – 2015 Donald J. Leopold Chair, Department of Environmental and Forest Biology SUNY-ESF 1 Forestry Drive Syracuse, NY 13210 Email: [email protected]; ph: (315) 470-6760 July 15, 2015 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . .4 Overview to Annual Report . 4 Building(s) . 6 Teaching . 7 Summary of main courses taught by faculty members . .7 Course teaching load summary by faculty members . 11 Undergraduate student advising loads . 12 Curriculum changes . 13 Undergraduate students enrolled in each EFB major . 13 Listing of awards and recognition . 13 Research/Scholarship . .13 Summary of publications/presentations . .13 Science Citation Indices . 14 Summary of grant activity . 16 Patents and Patent Applications . .18 Listing of awards and recognition . 18 Outreach and Service . 18 Enumeration of outreach activities . 19 Summary of grant panel service . 19 Summary of journal editorial board service. 19 Number of journal manuscripts reviewed by faculty. 20 Listing of awards and recognition . 20 Service Learning . 20 Graduate Students. 22 Number of students by degree objectives . 23 Graduate student national fellowships/awards . 23 Graduate recruitment efforts . 23 Graduate student advising . 24 Courses having TA support and enrollment in each . 25 2 Governance and Administrative Structure . .. 26 Components. 26 Supporting offices, committees, directors, and coordinators . 27 Budget . 29 State budget allocations . 29 Funds Generated by Summer Courses and Grad Tuition Incentive Program . 30 SUNY Research Foundation research incentives funds . 30 Development funds .
    [Show full text]
  • Then & Now: Albany, the South Mall and a Neighborhood Lost
    Then & Now: Albany, the South Mall and a Neighborhood Lost City Engineer, Public Works Negatives, 1930-1949. From the Archival Collection of the Albany County Hall of Records. The Princess and “The Gut” 89-01830. Private Donor. Netherlands Royal Family Visit to Albany Photo Collection. Princess Beatrix of the Netherlands, Governor Nelson Rockefeller and Mayor Erastus Corning, September, 1959. “The South Mall will be the greatest single governmental office complex history has ever known.” – Mayor Erastus Corning 2nd In September of 1959, Princess Beatrix of the Netherlands came to Albany, New York to commemorate the 350th anniversary of Henry Hudson’s exploratory voyage on the Hudson River at the Hudson-Champlain Celebration. While giving the young royal a tour of downtown Albany, Governor Nelson A. Rockefeller felt embarrassed by the deteriorating South End neighborhood referred to by some as “The Gut,” an area of many dilapidated buildings and vacant structures. Albany Mayor Erastus Corning 2nd told the Knickerbocker News in 1979 that: “Rockefeller thought [the] buildings the Princess and those with her saw were not as good-looking or appropriate for a capital city as he thought they should be.” In an attempt to revitalize Albany and transform it into a city outsiders would deem worthy of being New York’s capital, Rockefeller proposed the construction of a large, modern governmental complex. In order to create this lavish site he envisioned, Rockefeller seized 98.5 acres of land in Albany’s South End through eminent domain in 1962 and demolition soon began. As a result, thousands of families and business owners lost their properties and were forced to relocate.
    [Show full text]
  • Episodes from a Hudson River Town Peak of the Catskills, Ulster County’S 4,200-Foot Slide Mountain, May Have Poked up out of the Frozen Terrain
    1 Prehistoric Times Our Landscape and First People The countryside along the Hudson River and throughout Greene County always has been a lure for settlers and speculators. Newcomers and longtime residents find the waterway, its tributaries, the Catskills, and our hills and valleys a primary reason for living and enjoying life here. New Baltimore and its surroundings were formed and massaged by the dynamic forces of nature, the result of ongoing geologic events over millions of years.1 The most prominent geographic features in the region came into being during what geologists called the Paleozoic era, nearly 550 million years ago. It was a time when continents collided and parted, causing upheavals that pushed vast land masses into hills and mountains and complementing lowlands. The Kalkberg, the spiny ridge running through New Baltimore, is named for one of the rock layers formed in ancient times. Immense seas covered much of New York and served as collect- ing pools for sediments that consolidated into today’s rock formations. The only animals around were simple forms of jellyfish, sponges, and arthropods with their characteristic jointed legs and exoskeletons, like grasshoppers and beetles. The next integral formation event happened 1.6 million years ago during the Pleistocene epoch when the Laurentide ice mass developed in Canada. This continental glacier grew unyieldingly, expanding south- ward and retreating several times, radically altering the landscape time and again as it traveled. Greene County was buried. Only the highest 5 © 2011 State University of New York Press, Albany 6 / Episodes from a Hudson River Town peak of the Catskills, Ulster County’s 4,200-foot Slide Mountain, may have poked up out of the frozen terrain.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Vulnerability and Adaptation Report for the City of Schenectady
    January 2021 Climate Vulnerability and Adaptation Report For the City of Schenectady Climate Smart Communities Task Force Climate Vulnerability & Adaptation Report January 2021 Table of Contents Executive Summary………………………………………………………. p. 2 Introduction………………………………………………………………… p. 3 Definitions Project Description Study Area Methodology Climate Profile…………………………………………………………… p. 10 Vulnerable Systems……………………………………………….……. p. 13 Infrastructure…………………………………………………………..……….. p. 13 Energy & Utilities Transportation Water & Sewer Critical Facilities Ecological……………………………………………………………………….. p. 20 Waterways Urban Forest, Natural Habitat, & Invasive Species Socioeconomic…………………………………………………………………. p. 22 Public Health Economic Vulnerability Social Vulnerability Environmental Justice Recommendations & Adaptation Strategies…………………………p. 30 Appendix……………………………………………………………….….. p. 34 1 Climate Vulnerability & Adaptation Report January 2021 Executive Summary A. The purpose of this document is to provide an outline of the challenges the City of Schenectady will face in the wake of climate change, as well as the best ways in which we can respond to these challenges. B. The Climate Smart Communities (CSC) Task Force was established in Spring 2019 in order to complete a series of tasks outlined by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) and to help the City of Schenectady become a certified Climate Smart Community. a. Mission Statement: The City of Schenectady’s Climate Smart Communities (CSC) Task Force serves as a resource and catalyst to promote and provide guidance on environmental, social and economic sustainability. The group serves as a bridge between ideas and their practical implementation by advising the City Council, fostering local partnerships, and engaging our local communities to develop goals, policies, and practices that will improve the well-being of our city and ensure a vibrant and resilient future for all.
    [Show full text]
  • LINCOLN and the COPPERHEADS in the CIVIL WAR in January 1863
    SNAKES LURKING IN THE GRASS: LINCOLN AND THE COPPERHEADS IN THE CIVIL WAR In January 1863, Abraham Lincoln was confronted with a threat more dangerous than that of the Confederate Army. The Union Army was visibly struggling toward victory with each passing battle and it seemed as if the war was far from concluding. Lincoln’s problems were not just limited to the battlefield, but the president was also burdened in dealing with intense opposition toward his government on the homefront. The threat was the Copperhead movement: Congressional Democrats were banning together in opposition to the war and proposing immediate peace through negotiations with the Confederacy. The Copperhead challenge came at an uneasy period in Lincoln’s presidency as the American public became more hostile towards the war effort. Numerous setbacks for the Union troops and the hardships of the war at home wore at the patience of many Americans and the President himself. The Copperheads took advantage of the public agitation by attacking Lincoln’s actions and character while deeming his expansion of power as unconstitutional and dangerous. Lincoln’s suspension of habeas corpus and use of martial law agitated this political opposition. The Copperheads were successful in gaining support before the election of 1864 through their attacks on Lincoln’s perceived abuse of civil liberties and expansion of power; however, Lincoln’s ability to lead the nation in troubling times, as well as a turn in the tide of the war, prevented the election of a Copperhead president and exposed the weaknesses of the movement. The supporters of the Copperhead movement were quite varied and diverse.
    [Show full text]
  • Route 5 Transit Gateway
    Final Land Use and Transportation Plan Route 5 Transit Gateway Submitted to the City of Schenectady and the Capital District Transportation Committee by IBI Group with River Street Planning & Development, LLC and Creighton Manning Engineering, LLP August 30, 2010 IBI GROUP FINAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN – ROUTE 5 TRANSIT GATEWAY Route 5 Transit Gateway Land Use and Transportation Plan Acknowledgements Study Advisory Committee Steve Caruso, Assistant to the City Engineer, City of Schenectady Michael Dussault, General Electric Todd Fabozzi, Capital District Regional Planning Commission Stephen J. Feeney, Schenectady County Department of Economic Development and Planning Michael A. Finocchi, YMCA Pat Godlewski, Schenectady County Community College Lyn Gordon, Stockade Neighborhood Association Jim Phelps, AAA Northway Susan Rank, The Chamber of Schenectady County Jim Salengo, Downtown Schenectady Improvement Corporation Doug Sayles, Cornerstone Advisors, Ltd. Mila Vega, Capital District Transportation Authority Carrie Ward, Capital District Transportation Authority Michael Wyatt, New York State Department of Transportation Project Team Steve Strichman, Schenectady City Planning Christine Primiano, Schenectady City Planning Anne Benware, Capital District Transportation Committee Sreekumar Nampoothiri, Capital District Transportation Committee Consultant Team IBI Group River Street Planning & Development Creighton Manning Engineering And The members of the public who contributed to the two public meetings. AUGUST 30, 2010 iii IBI GROUP FINAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN – ROUTE 5 TRANSIT GATEWAY Disclosure Statement This report was prepared in cooperation with the City of Schenectady, Capital District Transportation Committee (CDTC), Schenectady County, Capital District Transportation Authority (CDTA), and New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT). This report was funded in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration [and Federal Transit Administration], United State Department of Transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • January/February 2011
    Schenectady County Historical Society Newsletter Volume 54 54 NumberNumber 1-2 1-2 JanuaryJanuary-Februar - Februaryy 2011 2011 3322 Washington Avenue,Avenue, Schenectady, Schenectady, New New York York 12305 12305 (518) 374-0263374-0263 Web site: http://www.schist.org • • Editor Editor email:email: [email protected] [email protected] FAXFAX:: (518)(518) 688688-2825-2825 Librarian email:email: [email protected] [email protected] • Curator• Curator email: email: [email protected] [email protected] FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH – A Brief History by David Vincent For its first century of existence, regular Christian worship at the Dutch Reformed Church in Schenectady was conducted only in Dutch. As the English-speaking population grew, so did a desire for services in English, primarily driven by members of the Church of England, the official church of the Province. The city‘s population, decimated following its destruction in 1690, was about 300 households in 1759 when land for an English chapel was purchased.1 Ground was broken the same year for a building originally planned as a chapel for all English speaking peoples,2 and Presbyterians and other ―dissenters‖ (non-Anglican Protestants) participated in both land and material acquisition. Construction began in 1762. As for the Presbyterians, while the actual date of organization is unknown, the best current approximation is 1760. Friction developed early on between the two competing English groups. A 1765 letter from the Schenectady Anglican churchwardens to Sir William Johnson sought his acceptance as a trustee and his support for a petition before the Governor to grant the congregation a ―Charter to Secure their Rights and privileges in the Church built here‖ in order to ―prevent for the future the presbyterians from making any unjust attempts on the priviledges in the Church.‖3 –Continued on Page 4 John C.
    [Show full text]
  • Please Check the ECOS Website for Event Updates
    Please check the ECOS website for event updates. ECOS NEWS CALENDAR of EVENTS for September 2015 DATE GROUP ACTIVITY – LOCATION CONTACT Sept 2/W ETTNC Explore the Shore @ Thompson's Lake at 10am 872-0800 Sept 3/Th FREEC Early Morning Bird Walk @ 7:30am 475-0921 Sept 4/F APBP Walk: Friday Walk 12:00-1:00 free pre-register 456-0655 Sept 5/Sa APBP Ravine Ramble 11:00 am fee $3 pre-register 456-0655 ESCV Walk: Johnstown, NY 10:00 http://walkescv.org/ ETTNC Early Morning Bird Walk @ 7:30am 872-0800 ETTNC Meet Kelly Martin: Local Wildlife Rehabilitator @ 10am 872-0800 FREEC Big Pine Trail Naturalist Walk @ 10am. Corvid Presentation @ 2pm 475-0291 GLA Geocaching 1:00pm http://www.landisarboretum.org/ SCADK Hike: Sacandaga/Leader's Choice. Class II/III Ed Cunningham 885-7444 Sept 6/Su APBP Walk: Wonder Walk 1:00 pm fee $3 pre-register 456-0655 SCADK Hike: Leader's Choice. Class II/III Clark Darlington 370-2144 Sept 8/Tu SCADK Hike: Climb Cat Mountain. Five mile trip *alt date 9/9 Walt Hayes 399-7482 Sept/ 10 Th FREEC Early Morning Bird Walk @ 7:30am 475-0291 Sept 12/ Sa ESCV Walk: Bennington, VT 10:00 http://walkescv.org/ FREEC Old Field Trail Naturalist Walk @ 10am. Insect Walk @ 2pm 475-0291 GLA Nature Art 2:00pm http://www.landisarboretum.org/ SCADK Hike: Leader's Choice. Class II/III Bob Wright 279-1428 Sept 13/Su APBP Class: Learn 10 Trees Fee $3 pre-register 456-0655 ESCV Walk: Albany 1:30pm http://walkescv.org/ SCADK Hike: Sacandaga/Leader's Choice.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Projects in Your Neighborhood
    Transportation Projects in Your Neighborhood Major PIN Contract Number Region 000616 D263845 10 LONG ISLAND 000822 10 LONG ISLAND 000823 10 LONG ISLAND 001145 D264139 10 LONG ISLAND 001627 D263744 10 LONG ISLAND 001767 D264097 10 LONG ISLAND 001768 10 LONG ISLAND 003014 D264134 10 LONG ISLAND 004241 D264048 10 LONG ISLAND 004242 D264049 10 LONG ISLAND 004243 10 LONG ISLAND 005409 10 LONG ISLAND Page 1 of 1260 09/25/2021 Transportation Projects in Your Neighborhood Project Title OP SHARED USE PATH TOBAY TO CAPTREE South Ferry Dock at NY114 Improvements NY114 Pavement Resurfacing Stephen Hands Path to South Ferry NY231 LAKE TO I495 CONCRETE PAVEMENT REPAIR NY112 RECONS I495 TO GRANNY RD RMC/FIRE ISLAND INLET BRIDGE REHAB RMC Rustic Rail Replacement NY27A to SSP NY454 DRAINAGE FEUEREISEN TO JOHNSON NY25 PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS NY25/NY107 BRIDGE REHAB NY25 Intersection Improvement at Coram/Mt. Sinai Rd. NY347 RECONST HALLOCK RD TO CR97 Page 2 of 1260 09/25/2021 Transportation Projects in Your Neighborhood Project Description Construction of 3rd phase of 14 mile shared-use path along the north side of Ocean Parkway. Phase 3 extends between TOBAY and Captree State Park Towns of Oyster Bay, Islip and Babylon, Nassau and Suffolk Counties Improve South Ferry Dock at NY114 including reconstruction of the approach to meet the new dock elevation, drainage improvements, replacement of existing bulkhead and elevation of adjacent gravel parking area, Town of Southampton, Suffolk County. NY114 Pavement Resurfacing from Stephen Hands Path to South Ferry, Towns of East Hampton and Southampton, Suffolk County. Concrete Pavement repair including joint sealing, diamond grinding, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizen Participation Plan for the Former Marlou Formal Wear Site
    New York State Department of Environmental Conservation State Superfund Program Citizen Participation Plan for The Former Marlou Formal Wear Site 1108 State Street Schenectady Schenectady County, New York March 2013 Contents Section Page Number 1. What is New York=s State Superfund Program? ..................................................................3 2. Citizen Participation Activities ...............................................................................................3 3. Major Issues of Public Concern .............................................................................................8 4. Site Information .......................................................................................................................8 5. Investigation and Cleanup Process ........................................................................................8 Appendix A B Project Contacts and Locations of Reports and Information ....................................................................................................................12 Appendix B B Site Contact List ..................................................................................................13 Appendix C B Site Location Map ...............................................................................................19 * * * * * Note: The information presented in this Citizen Participation Plan was current as of the date of its approval by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Portions of this Citizen Participation
    [Show full text]