Niskayuna Town Historian, Denis Brennan
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Community Profile
Community Profile City of Schenectady Comprehensive Plan 2020 Reinventing the City of Invention Brian U. Stratton Mayor Community Profile Table of Contents Demographic Characteristics ............................................................................................................ 5 Economic Profile ..........................................................................................................................13 Real Estate and Tax Base Analysis .....................................................................................................31 Housing ......................................................................................................................................43 Infrastructure and Transportation.....................................................................................................59 Natural Resources .........................................................................................................................72 Community Character & Historic Preservation......................................................................................76 Recreation ..................................................................................................................................83 Government, Public Safety and Community Institutions..........................................................................90 List of Tables and Figures Tables Table 1: Summary Demographic Table, City of Schenectady ...................................................................... -
Route 5 Transit Gateway
Final Land Use and Transportation Plan Route 5 Transit Gateway Submitted to the City of Schenectady and the Capital District Transportation Committee by IBI Group with River Street Planning & Development, LLC and Creighton Manning Engineering, LLP August 30, 2010 IBI GROUP FINAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN – ROUTE 5 TRANSIT GATEWAY Route 5 Transit Gateway Land Use and Transportation Plan Acknowledgements Study Advisory Committee Steve Caruso, Assistant to the City Engineer, City of Schenectady Michael Dussault, General Electric Todd Fabozzi, Capital District Regional Planning Commission Stephen J. Feeney, Schenectady County Department of Economic Development and Planning Michael A. Finocchi, YMCA Pat Godlewski, Schenectady County Community College Lyn Gordon, Stockade Neighborhood Association Jim Phelps, AAA Northway Susan Rank, The Chamber of Schenectady County Jim Salengo, Downtown Schenectady Improvement Corporation Doug Sayles, Cornerstone Advisors, Ltd. Mila Vega, Capital District Transportation Authority Carrie Ward, Capital District Transportation Authority Michael Wyatt, New York State Department of Transportation Project Team Steve Strichman, Schenectady City Planning Christine Primiano, Schenectady City Planning Anne Benware, Capital District Transportation Committee Sreekumar Nampoothiri, Capital District Transportation Committee Consultant Team IBI Group River Street Planning & Development Creighton Manning Engineering And The members of the public who contributed to the two public meetings. AUGUST 30, 2010 iii IBI GROUP FINAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN – ROUTE 5 TRANSIT GATEWAY Disclosure Statement This report was prepared in cooperation with the City of Schenectady, Capital District Transportation Committee (CDTC), Schenectady County, Capital District Transportation Authority (CDTA), and New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT). This report was funded in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration [and Federal Transit Administration], United State Department of Transportation. -
Final Armory Historic Context
FINAL ARMORY HISTORIC CONTEXT ARMY NATIONAL GUARD NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU June 2008 FINAL HISTORIC CONTEXT STUDY Prepared for: Army National Guard Washington, DC Prepared by: Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc Engineers-Architects-Consultants Kansas City, Missouri And Architectural and Historical Research, LLC Kansas City, Missouri Below is the Disclaimer which accompanied the historic context when submitted to the NGB in draft form in 2005. Due to reorganization of the document prior to its finalization, the section in which Burns & McDonnell references below has been changed and is now Section II of the document, which is written in its entirety by Ms. Renee Hilton, Historical Services Division, Office of Public Affairs &Strategic Communications, National Guard Bureau. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION, BACKGROUND, AND METHODOLOGY ........................... 1-1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 BACKGROUND............................................................................................. 1-1 1.3 SURVEY BOUNDARIES AND RESOURCES ............................................... 1-2 1.4 SURVEY OBJECTIVES................................................................................. 1-2 1.5 METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................... 1-3 1.6 REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS.............................................................. 1-4 1.7 HISTORIC INTEGRITY ................................................................................ -
January/February 2007
Schenectady County Historical Society Volume 50 NumberNewsletter 1-2 January - February 2007 32 Washington Avenue, Schenectady, New York 12305 (518) 374-0263 Web site: http://www.schist.org • Editor email: [email protected] FAX: (518) 688-2825 Librarian email: [email protected] • Curator email: [email protected] Together, all extant armories chronicle the history of the volunteer militia from its emergence during the early years of the Republic, through its heyday during the Gilded Age as the backbone of the Ameri- can military system, to its early twentieth century role as the nation’s primary armed reserve force. Come to the lecture on Janu- ary 13th and learn all about the Washington Continentals, the Schenectady Citizens’ Corps, the Thirty-sixth and Thirty Seventh Separate Companies, and the 105th Infantry Regiment and their respective arsenals and armories. In 1992, the New York State Divi- sion of Military and Naval Affairs (DMNA), the agency in charge of the Army National Guard, entered into partnership with Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preserva- tion (OPRHP) to identify and evaluate all pre-World War II armories in the state. With Historic Armories of New York State funding provided by the U.S. Department of Defense’s Legacy Resource Management Program, DMNA New York’s arsenals and armories are among the most sponsored the nomination of most of its historic armories to the imposing monuments to the role of the citizen soldier in American National Register of Historic Places. Nancy L. Todd, on staff at military history and were built to house local units of the state’s OPRHP since 1982, directed the project. -
Changing Their Course, One Class at a Time
For alumni and friends of Schenectady County Community College Spring 2016 alumNEWS Changing Their Course, One Class at a Time Inside this issue Whether they’re called “returning adult students,” 2 Inauguration 2016 “mature learners” or “adult learners,” 49 percent of students at community colleges across the country are 3 A New Presence in between the ages of 22 and 39, with 14 percent over Downtown Schenectady the age of 401. Last semester, 15 percent of full-time students, 38 percent of part-time students and 24 4 Alumni Spotlight: percent of all students at SCCC were 30 years old An Authentic Taste and older. of France At SCCC, support for the returning adult student 5 Alumni Spotlight: ranges from the RESTART online club, to the Plus 50 Encore Completion Grant program the College Getting Big Laughs on launched in 2013, part of a nationwide initiative to The Tonight Show recruit and support older students (50 years old and 6 Remembering above) pursuing a new career. Toby Strianese The paths that led them to SCCC are often just as interesting as the students themselves and the goals and Samantha Vasquez 8 Gala Honors Community aspirations they have set. Samantha Vasquez and James Leaders, Alumna LaRose are two such students, one with an eye toward working in the criminal justice system and the other 9 A New Scholorship... planning for a second career after retirement. 10 Class Notes There are times when she has to tune her family out and 11 Upcoming Alumni Events the house “will be a wreck,” but it’s been worth it for Samantha, a 31-year-old single mother with two young sons ages 7 and 3. -
NEW YORK RISING COMMUNITY RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM CONCEPTUAL PLAN City of Schenectady, Town of Rotterdam
NEW YORK RISING COMMUNITY RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM CONCEPTUAL PLAN City of Schenectady, Town of Rotterdam October 2013 ISI Y R NG N C O S M IE M U NIT This document was developed by the City of Schenectady and the Town of Rotterdam Planning Committee as part of the NY Rising Community Reconstruction (NYRCR) Program within the Governor’s Office of Storm Recovery. The NYRCR Program is supported by NYS Homes and Community Renewal, NYS Department of State, and NYS Department of Transportation. Assistance was provided by the following consulting firms: Ecology and Environment, Inc. and River Street Planning & Development FOREWORD The New York Rising Community Reconstruction (NYRCR) program was established by Governor Andrew M. Cuomo to provide additional rebuilding and revitalization assistance to communities damaged by Superstorm Sandy, Hurricane Irene, and Tropical Storm Lee. This program empowers communities to prepare locally-driven recovery plans to identify innovative reconstruction projects and other needed actions to allow each community not only to survive, but also to thrive in an era when natural risks will become increasingly common. The NYRCR program is managed by the Governor’s Office of Storm Recovery in conjunction with New York State Homes and Community Renewal and the Department of State. The NYRCR program consists of both planning and implementation phases, to assist communities in making informed recovery decisions. The development of this conceptual plan is the result of innumerable hours of effort from volunteer planning committee members, members of the public, municipal employees, elected officials, state employees, and planning consultants. Across the state, over 102 communities are working together to build back better and stronger. -
Mohawk River Waterfront Revitalization Plan for Schenectady County
Mohawk River Waterfront Revitalization Plan for Schenectady County March 31, 2010 Developed and submitted by: Town of Glenville Town of Niskayuna Town of Rotterdam County of Schenectady City of Schenectady Village of Scotia This report was prepared for the New York State Department of State with funds provided under Title 11 of the Environmental Protection Fund. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 Section I.Mohawk River Waterfront Revitalization Area Boundary .................................................... 2 Town of Glenville .......................................................................................................... 2 Town of Niskayuna ......................................................................................................... 3 Town of Rotterdam ........................................................................................................ 4 City of Schenectady........................................................................................................ 4 Village of Scotia ............................................................................................................ 5 Section II. Inventory and Analysis ...........................................................................................10 1. Mohawk River Waterfront Revitalization Area—Local Laws and Regulations ................................. 10 2. Existing Land Use ..................................................................................................... -
Appendix a Preliminary Scopin
NextEra Energy Transmission New York, Inc. Marcy to Pleasant Valley Project Part A Application – Appendix A Preliminary Scoping Statement and Schedule NextEra Energy Transmission New York, Inc. Appendix A: Marcy to Pleasant Valley Project Preliminary Scoping Statement and Schedule Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................... A1-1 2.0 BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AND SCHEDULE ................................................................................. A2-1 2.1 Proposed Project ............................................................................................ A2-1 2.2 Proposed Project Schedule ............................................................................ A2-2 3.0 PROPOSED SCOPE OF ARTICLE VII STUDIES - EXHIBIT 4 ... A3-1 3.1 Land Use and Public Policy .......................................................................... A3-1 3.1.1 Existing Setting ................................................................................. A3-2 3.1.2 Proposed Program Studies ................................................................ A3-4 3.2 Visual Resources ........................................................................................... A3-5 3.2.1 Existing Setting ................................................................................. A3-5 3.2.2 Proposed Program Studies ................................................................ A3-8 3.3 Cultural Resources .......................................................................................