DOCSLIB.ORG

Mohawk River Waterfront Revitalization Plan for Schenectady County

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mohawk River Waterfront Revitalization Plan for Schenectady County Mohawk River Waterfront Revitalization Plan for Schenectady County March 31, 2010 Developed and submitted by: Town of Glenville Town of Niskayuna Town of Rotterdam County of Schenectady City of Schenectady Village of Scotia This report was prepared for the New York State Department of State with funds provided under Title 11 of the Environmental Protection Fund. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 Section I.Mohawk River Waterfront Revitalization Area Boundary .................................................... 2 Town of Glenville .......................................................................................................... 2 Town of Niskayuna ......................................................................................................... 3 Town of Rotterdam ........................................................................................................ 4 City of Schenectady........................................................................................................ 4 Village of Scotia ............................................................................................................ 5 Section II. Inventory and Analysis ...........................................................................................10 1. Mohawk River Waterfront Revitalization Area—Local Laws and Regulations ................................. 10 2. Existing Land Use ...................................................................................................... 12 3. Land Ownership Characteristics ..................................................................................... 23 4. Existing Zoning and Land Use Regulations ......................................................................... 26 5. Infrastructure........................................................................................................... 37 6. Important Agricultural Land.......................................................................................... 44 7. Sand and Gravel Mining ............................................................................................... 44 8. Topography/Geology .................................................................................................. 45 9. Environmentally-Sensitive Areas .................................................................................... 48 10. Scenic Resources ..................................................................................................... 52 11. Existing Water Resources............................................................................................ 53 12. Fish and Wildlife Habitats........................................................................................... 54 13. Existing Water Use, Public Access and Recreational Resources............................................... 55 14. Historic Resources.................................................................................................... 64 Section III.Proposed Land & Water Uses and Proposed Projects ......................................................68 Key Issues and Opportunities............................................................................................ 68 Proposed Development Projects........................................................................................ 79 Section IV: Implementation ...................................................................................................88 Implementation Timeline and Potential Funding .................................................................... 88 Proposed Local Laws and Regulations ................................................................................. 91 Appendix A. Public Participation Process..................................................................................94 Appendix B. Mohawk River Boater Survey .................................................................................96 Mohawk River Waterfront Revitalization Plan for Schenectady County INTRODUCTION Schenectady County is located in eastern central portion of New York State, north of Albany and in the Albany-Schenectady-Troy Metropolitan Statistical Area. Schenectady is an irregularly-shaped county that is bounded on the north by Montgomery and Saratoga counties; on the east by Saratoga and Albany Counties; on the south by Albany and Schoharie Counties; and on the west by Schoharie and Montgomery Counties (Figure 1). With a population of 145,555 residents (2000 census) and an area of 210 square miles, Schenectady County is the second smallest of the 57 New York counties outside of New York City. The Mohawk River Waterfront Revitalization Area, which is the subject of this plan, includes land in the five municipalities that are located directly along the Mohawk River in Schenectady County including: Town of Glenville Figure 1. Schenectady County borders. Town of Niskayuna Town of Rotterdam City of Schenectady Village of Scotia Each of these communities is committed to protecting and enhancing Schenectady County’s water resources and leveraging these assets to contribute to the economic strength of each individual community and to the greater Schenectady County community. This plan has been developed to assess the current state of Schenectady’s water assets and to create a blueprint that will guide the future development and management of these areas. The residents of the communities that participated in this plan were encouraged to participate in its development. A summary of this public participation process is included in Appendix A. The Mohawk River Waterfront Revitalization Plan for Schenectady County was developed in a way that seeks to balance: Encouraging economic growth and development Stewardship to the quality of water resources and overall community life Improving public access to and enjoyment of recreation, cultural, and historic resources Participating in regional coordination of initiatives in order to effectively develop Schenectady’s water resources Page 1 Mohawk River Waterfront Revitalization Plan for Schenectady County SECTION I. MOHAWK RIVER WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION AREA BOUNDARY Schenectady County is comprised of the Towns of Glenville, Niskayuna, Rotterdam, Princetown, and Duanesburg; the City of Schenectady; and the Villages of Delanson and Scotia (Figure 2). The Mohawk River flows through Schenectady County in a southeasterly direction and forms a part of the County’s northeastern border. Within the County, the City of Schenectady and the Towns of Niskayuna, Rotterdam, Princetown, Delanson and Duanesburg are located on the southern side of the Mohawk River; the Town of Glenville and Village of Scotia are located on the northern side of the river. As will be discussed throughout this plan, the Mohawk River Waterfront Revitalization Area is divided Figure 2. Schenectady County, New York. into five sub areas consisting of the communities that directly border the Mohawk River (Glenville, Niskayuna, Rotterdam, Schenectady, and Scotia). The waterfront boundary for each community along the Mohawk River Waterfront Revitalization Area is shown in Figure 3-5. The existing waterfront access facilities are shown in Figures 6. A brief description of each participating community and its boundary is included below. TOWN OF GLENVILLE The Town of Glenville is located in the northern part of Schenectady County. Glenville was incorporated in 1821 and as of the 2000 census, the town population was 28,183. Glenville has a total area of 50.9 square miles, of which 49.9 square miles is land and 1.0 square miles (1.97%) is water. The Town is split among three public school districts; Scotia-Glenville, Burnt Hills- Ballston Lake, and Niskayuna. Municipal Waterfront Revitalization Boundaries—Beginning at the Town boundary in the Mohawk River; then north along the Town boundary to Touareuna Road, then east along Touareuna Road and Hatcher Avenue; then east along a line of 350 north of and parallel to Route 5 to the point east of Johnson Road where the Conrail tracks cross Route 5 then east along Conrail tracks to Rector Road; then south on Rector Road to Route 5; then east along Route 5 to the Town Boundary with the Village of Scotia at South Toll Street then south and east along the Village boundary to the west side of the Village to the Town of Glenville boundary at Sunnyside Road then proceeding east along Sunnyside Road to the intersection of Freemans Bridge Road; then north on Freemans Bridge Road to Maple Avenue; then west on Maple Avenue to the intersection with Alplaus Avenue; then southeast along Alplaus Avenue to the Town boundary; then south to the Mohawk River; then west along the Town boundary on the Mohawk River to the point of origin. Municipal Waterfront Resources—The Town of Glenville has more than 13 miles of riverfront area. Development in many of Glenville’s riverfront areas is limited due to steep slopes, wetlands, and the presence of railroad lines. The notable exceptions are the commercial nodes located at the Mohawk Valley Airport, Arrowhead Marina, Maalwyck Park, Freemans Bridge Road, and the Maritime Center/Mohawk Valley Marine in Alplaus. While development area along Glenville’s waterfront Page 2 Mohawk River Waterfront Revitalization Plan for Schenectady County is limited, the Town’s residents do enjoy a great deal of access to the waterfront through existing parks and waterfront resources.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mohawk River Watershed – HUC-12
    ID Number Name of Mohawk Watershed 1 Switz Kill 2 Flat Creek 3 Headwaters West Creek 4 Kayaderosseras Creek 5 Little Schoharie Creek 6 Headwaters Mohawk River 7 Headwaters Cayadutta Creek 8 Lansing Kill 9 North Creek 10 Little West Kill 11 Irish Creek 12 Auries Creek 13 Panther Creek 14 Hinckley Reservoir 15 Nowadaga Creek 16 Wheelers Creek 17 Middle Canajoharie Creek 18 Honnedaga 19 Roberts Creek 20 Headwaters Otsquago Creek 21 Mill Creek 22 Lewis Creek 23 Upper East Canada Creek 24 Shakers Creek 25 King Creek 26 Crane Creek 27 South Chuctanunda Creek 28 Middle Sprite Creek 29 Crum Creek 30 Upper Canajoharie Creek 31 Manor Kill 32 Vly Brook 33 West Kill 34 Headwaters Batavia Kill 35 Headwaters Flat Creek 36 Sterling Creek 37 Lower Ninemile Creek 38 Moyer Creek 39 Sixmile Creek 40 Cincinnati Creek 41 Reall Creek 42 Fourmile Brook 43 Poentic Kill 44 Wilsey Creek 45 Lower East Canada Creek 46 Middle Ninemile Creek 47 Gooseberry Creek 48 Mother Creek 49 Mud Creek 50 North Chuctanunda Creek 51 Wharton Hollow Creek 52 Wells Creek 53 Sandsea Kill 54 Middle East Canada Creek 55 Beaver Brook 56 Ferguson Creek 57 West Creek 58 Fort Plain 59 Ox Kill 60 Huntersfield Creek 61 Platter Kill 62 Headwaters Oriskany Creek 63 West Kill 64 Headwaters South Branch West Canada Creek 65 Fly Creek 66 Headwaters Alplaus Kill 67 Punch Kill 68 Schenevus Creek 69 Deans Creek 70 Evas Kill 71 Cripplebush Creek 72 Zimmerman Creek 73 Big Brook 74 North Creek 75 Upper Ninemile Creek 76 Yatesville Creek 77 Concklin Brook 78 Peck Lake-Caroga Creek 79 Metcalf Brook 80 Indian
    [Show full text]
  • Niskayuna Town Historian, Denis Brennan
    Schenectady County Historical Society Newsletter Vol. 63, No. 2, Spring 2019 | 518.374.0263 | schenectadyhistorical.org Schenectady's Silent Witness to History By Neil B. Yetwin One of the most enduring and intriguing of Schenectady’s many antiquities is the mounted cannon at the end of North Ferry Street in the Stockade’s Riverside Park. For nearly a century this imposing piece of ordnance has stood watch eastward over the Mohawk River as if expecting momentarily to defend the city against any who threatened the peace and security of its inhabitants. Schenectady historian John J. Birch suggested in 1961 that the cannon’s history is "a mystery which undoubtedly will never be solved." Yet physical clues and scattered anecdotal evidence might shed light upon those mysteries that have shrouded the cannon for more than two centuries and perhaps help restore it to its proper place in Schenectady’s history. It was once assumed that the cannon was cast in bronze, but it is in fact iron, weighing in excess of 2,300 pounds and measuring 7’9” from breech to muzzle. It was once mounted on an oak carriage twice its length (for balance) and fired a solid iron softball-size round shot weighing 9.1 pounds – thus its designation as a nine-pounder. The cannon had two trunnions, cylindrical projections near the barrel’s center allowing it to be easily raised or lowered. Vestiges of those trunnions remain visible, as does the vent or touch-hole above the breech. Cascabel, two handles on which to attach ropes to reduce recoil, once graced its barrel.
    [Show full text]
  • Brooklyn College and Graduate School of the City University of NY, Brooklyn, NY 11210 and Northeastern Science Foundation Affiliated with Brooklyn College, CUNY, P.O
    FLYSCH AND MOLASSE OF THE CLASSICAL TACONIC AND ACADIAN OROGENIES: MODELS FOR SUBSURFACE RESERVOIR SETTINGS GERALD M. FRIEDMAN Brooklyn College and Graduate School of the City University of NY, Brooklyn, NY 11210 and Northeastern Science Foundation affiliated with Brooklyn College, CUNY, P.O. Box 746, Troy, NY 12181 ABSTRACT This field trip will examine classical sections of the Appalachians including Cambro-Ordovician basin-margin and basin-slope facies (flysch) of the Taconics and braided and meandering stteam deposits (molasse) of the Catskills. The deep­ water settings are part of the Taconic sequence. These rocks include massive sandstones of excellent reservoir quality that serve as models for oil and gas exploration. With their feet, participants may straddle the classical Logan's (or Emmon 's) line thrust plane. The stream deposits are :Middle to Upper Devonian rocks of the Catskill Mountains which resulted from the Acadian Orogeny, where the world's oldest and largest freshwater clams can be found in the world's oldest back-swamp fluvial facies. These fluvial deposits make excellent models for comparable subsurface reservoir settings. INTRODUCTION This trip will be in two parts: (1) a field study of deep-water facies (flysch) of the Taconics, and (2) a field study of braided- and meandering-stream deposits (molasse) of the Catskills. The rocks of the Taconics have been debated for more than 150 years and need to be explained in detail before the field stops make sense to the uninitiated. Therefore several pages of background on these deposits precede the itinera.ry. The Catskills, however, do not need this kind of orientation, hence after the Taconics (flysch) itinerary, the field stops for the Catskills follow immediately without an insertion of background informa­ tion.
    [Show full text]
  • Erie Canalway Map & Guide
    National Park Service Erie Canalway National Heritage Corridor U.S. Department of the Interior Erie Canalway Map & Guide Pittsford, Frank Forte Pittsford, The New York State Canal System—which includes the Erie, Champlain, Cayuga-Seneca, and Oswego Canals—is the centerpiece of the Erie Canalway National Heritage Corridor. Experience the enduring legacy of this National Historic Landmark by boat, bike, car, or on foot. Discover New York’s Dubbed the “Mother of Cities” the canal fueled the growth of industries, opened the nation to settlement, and made New York the Empire State. (Clinton Square, Syracuse, 1905, courtesy Library of Congress, Prints & Photographs Division, Detroit Publishing Extraordinary Canals Company Collection.) pened in 1825, New York’s canals are a waterway link from the Atlantic Ocean to the Great Lakes through the heart of upstate New York. Through wars and peacetime, prosperity and This guide presents exciting Orecession, flood and drought, this exceptional waterway has provided a living connection things to do, places to go, to a proud past and a vibrant future. Built with leadership, ingenuity, determination, and hard work, and exceptional activities to the canals continue to remind us of the qualities that make our state and nation great. They offer us enjoy. Welcome! inspiration to weather storms and time-tested knowledge that we will prevail. Come to New York’s canals this year. Touch the building stones CONTENTS laid by immigrants and farmers 200 years ago. See century-old locks, lift Canals and COVID-19 bridges, and movable dams constructed during the canal’s 20th century Enjoy Boats and Boating Please refer to current guidelines and enlargement and still in use today.
    [Show full text]
  • Mohawk River Trail (MRT) See Maps C & C-1 the Mohawk River Trail (MRT) Trailhead Is Located Bellamy Harbor Park
    Mohawk River Trail (MRT) See Maps C & C-1 The Mohawk River Trail (MRT) trailhead is located Bellamy Harbor Park. From there, the trail extends north, connecting Rome’s waterfront with historical sites, commercial districts, public services, local schools, city parks, the Griffiss Business and Technology Park, and residential neighborhoods. The MRT offers a unique multi- use trail recreational experience and excellent scenic vistas of the Mohawk River. Terrain: Flat Length: 3.97 miles Configuration: Point to Point Sections of the paved trail run along the Canal. Surface Type: Asphalt Trailhead Locations: Bellamy Harbor Park, Rome City Park, Chestnut Street parking area. Bridges allow bicyclists and pedestrians to cross the Canal. The flat paved trail provides easy riding for families with young Benches provide a place to take a break and take in the children. scenery. 14 ! S s S i p r d P u r d L r o R a e i l R n p e e M ll d H R H r T C g h vi te n u n a u e i r n s e C d e b n n l e l R e so l C t r a st d r e R l P n k R e e R g r d e in e g o p W L ki y r o R d Lee l R r n a e ck i d l d b d o R a i R d M t n W S l T n l S i ! t G R Center Stokes Weste Westernville iffo South rnville H rd d Rd ! ! H e T Slon Lee C Rd ill R Hill Rd h enter d o Stoke C m s Brookfield Rd Rd t a H S m a a l D C l F s i n o w i r l a S h o ki r t a o vi R n n d ki d u d d ield R er s M yd okf d s T R Town of e so n Bro R n n d Delta vans n E R e Delta Lake R r ! Western d Rd E d Terrace R State Park d D o !5 R H Lee !5 p M i a 46 d l p rsh Town Park l Lee
    [Show full text]
  • Glacial Lake Albany Butterfly Milkweed Plant Release Notice
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE BIG FLATS, NEW YORK AND ALBANY PINE BUSH PRESERVE COMMISSION ALBANY, NEW YORK AND THE NATURE CONSERVANCY EASTERN NEW YORK CHAPTER TROY, NEW YORK AND NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION ALBANY, NEW YORK NOTICE OF RELEASE OF GLACIAL LAKE ALBANY GERMPLASM BUTTERFLY MILKWEED The Albany Pine Bush Preserve Commission, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, The Nature Conservancy, and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, announce the release of a source-identified ecotype of Butterfly milkweed (Asclepias tuberosa L.). As a source identified release, this plant will be referred to as Glacial Lake Albany Germplasm butterfly milkweed, to document its original location. It has been assigned the NRCS accession number, 9051776. This alternative release procedure is justified because there is an immediate need for a source of local ecotype of butterfly milkweed. Plant material of this specific ecotype is needed for ecosystem and endangered species habitat restoration in the Pine Barrens of Glacial Lake Albany. The inland pitch pine - scrub oak barrens of Glacial Lake Albany are a globally rare ecosystem and provide habitat for 20 rare species, including the federally endangered Karner blue butterfly (Lycaeides melissa samuelis). The potential for immediate use is high and the commercial potential beyond Glacial Lake Albany is probably high. Collection Site Information: Stands are located within Glacial Lake Albany, from Albany, New York to Glens Falls, New York, and generally within the Albany Pine Bush Preserve, just west of Albany, New York. The elevation within the Pine Barrens is approximately 300 feet, containing a savanna-like ecosystem with sandy soils wind- swept into dunes, following the last glacial period.
    [Show full text]
  • Mohawk River Canoe Trip August 5, 2015
    Mohawk River Canoe Trip August 5, 2015 A short field guide by Kurt Hollocher The trip This is a short, 2-hour trip on the Mohawk River near Rexford Bridge. We will leave from the boat docks, just upstream (west) of the south end of the bridge. We will probably travel in a clockwise path, first paddling west toward Scotia, then across to the mouth of the Alplaus Kill. Then we’ll head east to see an abandoned lock for a branch of the Erie Canal, go under the Rexford Bridge and by remnants of the Erie Canal viaduct, to the Rexford cliffs. Then we cross again to the south bank, and paddle west back to the docks. Except during the two river crossings it is important to stay out of the navigation channel, marked with red and green buoys, and to watch out for boats. Depending on the winds, we may do the trip backwards. The river The Mohawk River drains an extensive area in east and central New York. Throughout most of its reach, it flows in a single, well-defined channel between uplands on either side. Here in the Rexford area, the same is true now, but it was not always so. Toward the end of the last Ice Age, about 25,000 years ago, ice covered most of New York State. As the ice retreated, a large valley glacier remained in the Hudson River Valley, connected to the main ice sheet a bit farther to the north, when most of western and central New York was clear of ice.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fishing: a Driver for Ecotourism
    New York FRESHWATER April 2019 FISHINGDigest Fishing: A Sport For Everyone NY Fishing 101 page 10 A Female's Guide to Fishing page 30 A summary of 2019–2020 regulations and useful information for New York anglers www.dec.ny.gov Message from the Governor Freshwater Fishing: A Driver for Ecotourism New York State is committed to increasing and supporting a wide array of ecotourism initiatives, including freshwater fishing. Our approach is simple—we are strengthening our commitment to protect New York State’s vast natural resources while seeking compelling ways for people to enjoy the great outdoors in a socially and environmentally responsible manner. The result is sustainable economic activity based on a sincere appreciation of our state’s natural resources and the values they provide. We invite New Yorkers and visitors alike to enjoy our high-quality water resources. New York is blessed with fisheries resources across the state. Every day, we manage and protect these fisheries with an eye to the future. To date, New York has made substantial investments in our fishing access sites to ensure that boaters and anglers have safe and well-maintained parking areas, access points, and boat launch sites. In addition, we are currently investing an additional $3.2 million in waterway access in 2019, including: • New or renovated boat launch sites on Cayuga, Oneida, and Otisco lakes • Upgrades to existing launch sites on Cranberry Lake, Delaware River, Lake Placid, Lake Champlain, Lake Ontario, Chautauqua Lake and Fourth Lake. New York continues to improve and modernize our fish hatcheries. As Governor, I have committed $17 million to hatchery improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Hudson Basin
    UPPER HUDSON BASIN Description of the Basin The Upper Hudson Basin is the largest in New York State (NYS) in terms of size, covering all or part of 20 counties and about 7.5 million acres (11,700 square miles) from central Essex County in the northeastern part of the State, southwest to central Oneida County in north central NYS, southeast down the Hudson River corridor to the State’s eastern border, and finally terminating in Orange and Putnam Counties. The Basin includes four major hydrologic units: the Upper Hudson, the Mohawk Valley, the Lower Hudson, and the Housatonic. There are about 23,000 miles of mapped rivers and streams in this Basin (USGS Watershed Index). Major water bodies include Ashokan Reservoir, Esopus Creek, Rondout Creek, and Wallkill River (Ulster and Orange Counties) in the southern part of the Basin, Schoharie Creek (Montgomery, Greene, and Schoharie Counties) and the Mohawk River (from Oneida County to the Hudson River) in the central part of the Basin, and Great Sacandaga Lake (Fulton and Saratoga Counties), Saratoga Lake (Saratoga County), and Schroon Lake (Warren and Essex Counties) in the northern part of the Basin. This region also contains many smaller lakes, ponds, creeks, and streams encompassing thousands of acres of lentic and lotic habitat. And, of course, the landscape is dominated by one of the most culturally, economically, and ecologically important water bodies in the State of New York - the Hudson River. For hundreds of years the Hudson River has helped bolster New York State’s economy by sustaining a robust commercial fishery, by providing high value residential and commercial development, and by acting as a critical transportation link between upstate New York/New England and the ports of New York City.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Profile
    Community Profile City of Schenectady Comprehensive Plan 2020 Reinventing the City of Invention Brian U. Stratton Mayor Community Profile Table of Contents Demographic Characteristics ............................................................................................................ 5 Economic Profile ..........................................................................................................................13 Real Estate and Tax Base Analysis .....................................................................................................31 Housing ......................................................................................................................................43 Infrastructure and Transportation.....................................................................................................59 Natural Resources .........................................................................................................................72 Community Character & Historic Preservation......................................................................................76 Recreation ..................................................................................................................................83 Government, Public Safety and Community Institutions..........................................................................90 List of Tables and Figures Tables Table 1: Summary Demographic Table, City of Schenectady ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Capacity Chart
    Meeting Capacity Chart Service Corridor The Rivers Ballroom The Mohawk The Hudson The Wabash The Edison Closet Counter Closet Counter Closet Closet Counter Pre-Function Area Room Square Ft. Dimensions Ceiling Ht. Classroom Theatre Banquet Reception Conference U-Shape Hollow Sq. The Rivers Ballroom 3285 73 x 45 15’ 135 365 264 330 - - - The Mohawk 1125 25 x 45 15’ 45 120 88 110 24 31 26 The Hudson 1080 24 x 45 15’ 45 120 88 110 24 31 26 The Wabash 1125 25 x 45 15’ 45 120 88 110 24 31 26 The Edison 399 21 x 19 15’ - - - - 10 - - FACILITIES FOR PRODUCTIVE MEETINGS: • 3700 sq. ft. of Versatile Meeting Space • Free Wireless & Wired HSIA • Custom Catering 100 Nott Terrace • Schenectady, NY 12308 • 518/393-4141 www.schenectady.doubletree.com Where the little things mean everything.TM DoubleTree by Hilton Schenectady, new york Begin your stay at DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel Schenectady with our delicious DoubleTree chocolate chip cookie, our welcome gift to you. Our downtown Schenectady hotel is a central cornerstone in this exciting and vibrant town and offers a convenient location just off Thruway 890. Easily accessible from Albany International Airport, the hotel is within walking distance to Proctors Theatre & Conference Facility and Union College. OUR HOTEL OFFERS: • 120 Guest Rooms • 3,700 Sq. Ft. of Function Space • Complimentary Wireless HSIA • 24-hour Fitness Center • LCD Flat Screen 32” HDTV • In-Room Dining • Full Business Center • On-site Restaurant and Bar 100 Nott Terrace Schenectady, NY 12308 AREA POINTS OF INTEREST For more information call 518/393-4141 • General Electric • Proctors Theatre • Siemens • Saratoga Springs Contact our sales team • Union College • Cooperstown Baseball Hall of Fame [email protected] • Rotterdam Square Mall • Stockade Historic District • Bow Tie Cinema Visit us online schenectady.doubletree.com Meeting Room Facilities & Services *Pricing varies based on number of overnight guest rooms and food & beverages requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Route 5 Transit Gateway
    Final Land Use and Transportation Plan Route 5 Transit Gateway Submitted to the City of Schenectady and the Capital District Transportation Committee by IBI Group with River Street Planning & Development, LLC and Creighton Manning Engineering, LLP August 30, 2010 IBI GROUP FINAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN – ROUTE 5 TRANSIT GATEWAY Route 5 Transit Gateway Land Use and Transportation Plan Acknowledgements Study Advisory Committee Steve Caruso, Assistant to the City Engineer, City of Schenectady Michael Dussault, General Electric Todd Fabozzi, Capital District Regional Planning Commission Stephen J. Feeney, Schenectady County Department of Economic Development and Planning Michael A. Finocchi, YMCA Pat Godlewski, Schenectady County Community College Lyn Gordon, Stockade Neighborhood Association Jim Phelps, AAA Northway Susan Rank, The Chamber of Schenectady County Jim Salengo, Downtown Schenectady Improvement Corporation Doug Sayles, Cornerstone Advisors, Ltd. Mila Vega, Capital District Transportation Authority Carrie Ward, Capital District Transportation Authority Michael Wyatt, New York State Department of Transportation Project Team Steve Strichman, Schenectady City Planning Christine Primiano, Schenectady City Planning Anne Benware, Capital District Transportation Committee Sreekumar Nampoothiri, Capital District Transportation Committee Consultant Team IBI Group River Street Planning & Development Creighton Manning Engineering And The members of the public who contributed to the two public meetings. AUGUST 30, 2010 iii IBI GROUP FINAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN – ROUTE 5 TRANSIT GATEWAY Disclosure Statement This report was prepared in cooperation with the City of Schenectady, Capital District Transportation Committee (CDTC), Schenectady County, Capital District Transportation Authority (CDTA), and New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT). This report was funded in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration [and Federal Transit Administration], United State Department of Transportation.
    [Show full text]