Airline Market Review 2018 Airline Market Review 2018 Timeline of 2018

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Airline Market Review 2018 Airline Market Review 2018 Timeline of 2018 AIRLINE MARKET REVIEW 2018 AIRLINE MARKET REVIEW 2018 TIMELINE OF 2018 July JetBlue founder David Neeleman cements plan to launch a new US carrier in 2021 by signing for 60 A220s at Farnborough air show September Former Air Canada executive Ben Smith takes January March November the helm at Air France-KLM Niki Lauda-led consortium Qantas carries out first non- Icelandair drops planned May boss aiming to settle the Laudamotion wins race for stop flight from Australia to merger with Wow Air, which Efforts to find an investor labour issues that prompted assets in Austrian carrier the UK after launching 17h in turns looks to Indigo for Air India fail after the departure of Jean-Marc Niki, in which Ryanair later sector flight from Perth to Partners in its search for privatisation process fails to Janaillac takes majority stake London Heathrow investment draw any bids Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec | | | | | | | | | | | | Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov August April Loss and restructuring IAG buys shares in measures revealed in Jet October December Norwegian to support Airways delayed second Delta Air Lines receives the Royal Air Maroc announced two bids for the low-cost quarter results show first Airbus A220 bound for plans to become operator, both of which are mounting challenges facing a North American carrier Oneworld’s first new full rejected Indian carriers February Lion Air 737 Max 8 (flight alliance member for six Qatar Airways takes delivery JT610) crashes, 189 dead years of first A350-1000 June Issue of lack of diversity and female representation among senior airline management is under- scored by Ill-judged joke from Qatar Airways chief Akbar Al-Baker 2 | FlightGlobal AIRLINE MARKET REVIEW 2018 REVIEW OF 2018 While wider political tensions dominated much of the agenda unable to pass these additional costs through higher fares. Airlines to cease operations this year included Primera, which and continue to cause potential headaches for airlines, it was was grounded before its attempts to tackle the emerging long- the return of a familiar problem in the shape of rising fuel “This year has been tougher than we though it would be,” haul low-cost market on the Transatlantic had really begun. prices that did the most to knock airlines from their high-profit says IATA chief economist Brian Pearce. “There was a quite a altitude during 2018. squeeze on airline margins in the second and third quarters That sector remains an area of much development, though because of the sharp rise in fuel costs.” still only a small part of overall capacity. Questions have Fears of a potential trade war have circled following the Trump surrounded the most high-profile European carrier in the administration’s introduction of tariffs on certain products But it still remains, relatively speaking, a profitable period for segment, Norwegian, throughout the year, after IAG bid for aimed at Europe, Canada and, most notably, China. This airlines. IATA expects industry profits has kept a threat hanging over potential global economic to be only $5 billion lower in 2018 development, joining other concerns such as the relentless than the $37.7 billion the industry Industry net profits by region uncertainty around Brexit in Europe and political shifts in made in its record-breaking 2017. several other countries. Ultimately, though, it is only the rapid development of the Iranian airline market has directly Profits for the larger groups have been kyboshed by Trump policy, halting hoped-for aircraft proved particularly resilient. While deliveries. there have, especially more recently, been airline failures, these have Higher fuel costs, however, were to prove all too real for largely affected smaller operators airlines. The barrel price of crude oil climbed a third over on the fringes of the industry. the course of the year, reaching the mid-$80s. While these Avianca Brazil, which filed for the more recently have dropped back sharply – moving below equivalent of bankruptcy protection year-beginning levels by December – the higher oil price had in December, is the largest operator already contributed to a string of profit warnings across the to enter formal restructuring this globe during the second half of the year as many carriers were year. Norwegian Source: IATA outlooks; 2018 and 2019 is forecast, figures for 2017 are revised since June 18 IATA outlook. Questions have surrounded the most high-profile European carrier in the segment, Norwegian, throughout the Other includes net total for Africa, Latin America, Middle East year, after IAG bid for the airline 3 | FlightGlobal AIRLINE MARKET REVIEW 2018 the airline. Norwegian, which has long defied its sceptics, was commitments regarding a lack of plans to add fifth-freedom NortH AMERICA emboldened by a stronger start to the year and resisted the flights. This, however, has done little to improve relations with Net profit: $14.3bn bids. IAG remains a small shareholder, and potentially a buyer, their US counterparts. Indeed, Qatar Airways ended the year Performance: Continues to lead industry profitability and the late fall in oil with eyes continuing to watch developments over the winter. poised to act on its earlier threat to walk out of Oneworld, prices during the year gave its relatively unhedged carriers a further boost Key issue: United Airlines’ expansion strategy began to gain momentum, as it heaping much of the blame on its relations with American bid to regain market share. This helped the carrier increase revenues enough to And the year ended with attention surrounding the future of Airlines, whilst the US carriers have gone on the attack over help offset rising fuel costs another player in that field, Icelandic operator Wow Air, after Qatar’s involvement with expanding Air Italy. ASIA-PACIFIC low-cost investment gurus Indigo Partners emerged as a Net profit: $9.6bn potential white knight following the collapse of its proposed One airline that is definitely quitting a global alliance is SkyTeam Performance: While some markets continued to enjoy strong financial fortunes, intense competition and devalued currencies against the US dollar contributed acquisition by Icelandair. carrier China Southern Airlines. The airline will not renew its to severe challenges in others as fuel costs rose membership of SkyTeam next year as it follows a strategy of Key issue: Indian carriers struggled notably with challenges at Jet Airways and a That was one of several rolling airline stories across the year. pursuing partnerships with carriers around the global failed attempt to privatise Air India, despite it being one of the fastest growing domestic air travel markets during the year In Europe, Michael O’Leary’s attempts to engage unions at Ryanair and overcome its operational issues continue to Uncertainty surrounded China’s HNA Group for much of EUROPE Net profit: $7.5bn dominate headlines. The sprawling nature of its operations the year. The group, which like Etihad had made a number Performance: A string of carriers on the fringes fell foul of the more challenging mean that despite getting several unions on board, there international investment in aviation companies in recent conditions as the peak summer season ended, resulting in a series of airline remains plenty of work to do. Unions too were a familiar years, sold several assets during the year, as part of efforts to failures Key issue: Concerns around Brexit continue to hang over Europe. British airlines problem for airline management at Air France-KLM – resulting overcome liquidity problems. or those with a strong UK presence undertook a string of measures, including in the early departure of group chief Jean-Marc Janaillac after adding new AOCs, to insulate themselves from the changing landscape a pay deal was voted down. It was another tough year in the Indian airline market, where MIDDLE EAST over-capacity and fierce competition compounded the rising Net profit: $600m Meanwhile, more than a year after Etihad Airways Group cost and weak currency environment. The year began with Performance: Challenging conditions for all three Gulf majors, which for a pulled the plug on its investments in Air Berlin and Alitalia, the failure to secure any bidders for a stake in debt-laden variety of reasons, have found their respective financial performances suffering Key issue: Etihad Airways remains in introspective mood as new chief executive those stories continue to play out. Jockeying for position in state carrier Air India, and was followed later by key players Tony Douglas attempted to steady the ship and focus on its core airline the battle for markets vacated by Air Berlin continues, notably Jet Airways, IndiGo and SpiceJet all swinging to losses in the operations after recent years of acquisitions at Berlin and Vienna, while the Italian carrier remains in normally profitable second quarter. The high-profile problems Latin AMERICA restructuring with little clarity yet on its future. at Jet in particular dominated headlines, as it embarked on a Net profit: $400m major restructuring and sought to raise capital. Performance: While the key Brazilian economy has improved countries in the region have faced increased challenges from the strong US dollar environment New Etihad chief Tony Douglas spent most of the year focusing Key issue: Moves to abandon the one-third built Mexico City airport after a on the core airline’s challenges – taking direct management of Weak currencies also impacted a number of countries, notably referendum organised by the incoming Mexican government, caused a blow to the carrier in a group restructure – and showing little of the in key economies Latin America where it is impact travel airline hopes of adding much-needed airport capacity in the city global appetite that dominated the group he inherited. Fresh demand in Brazil and Argentina as a result. Elsewhere in Latin AFRICA talk of a mega Gulf tie-up with Emirates resurfaced, but with America much of the narrative was set by fast-expanding low- Net loss: -$400m Performance: Another challenging year for some of the region’s biggest little outward evidence so far that there is any more political cost operators in the region.
Recommended publications
  • EGNOS Implementation Status
    EGNOS implementation status H2020 BlueGNSS Final meeting Katerina Strelcova, Aviation Market Development Innovation Officer, Project officer of H2020BlueGNSS project 18 July 2018 @ENAV, Rome Table of Content • GSA introduction • EGNOS implementation status • Airspace user capabilities • GSA support to foster EGNOS implementation 2 European GNSS Agency Mission: Resourcing: Gateway to Services • Galileo & EGNOS Operations and Service Provision 160 21 Staff Nationalities • Market Development of the applications and the receivers Gatekeeper of security • Security Accreditation Prague, Cz Rep – HQ St. Germain en Laye, FR – GSMC • Operation of Galileo Security Swanwick, UK – GSMC (tbc) Monitoring Centre, governmental Torrejon, ES – GSC Noordwijk, NL – GRC service (PRS) activities Toulouse, FR – EGNOS Brussels, BE – COMM 4 1. How GSA fits in the EU structure he GSA: governance summary Political Oversight Council and European Parliament Programme Management European GNSS Programme Committee EuropeanEuropean CommissionCommission Delegation Delegation and assistance European Space Agency Working Arrangement Administrative Board Security Accreditation Board Market Development Security GSMC operation GNSS exploitation European Satellite Navigation Programmes • Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) • Satellite Based Augmentation System (SBAS) • Worldwide coverage • Continental coverage • 22 Satellites constellation today • Increased accuracy and integrity over GPS • Full Operational Capability by 2020 • Next version will augment Galileo 5 EGNOS
    [Show full text]
  • IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 of 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report
    IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 OF 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report AGREEMENT : Standard PERIOD: P01 September 2021 MEMBER CODE MEMBER NAME ZONE STATUS CATEGORY XB-B72 "INTERAVIA" LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY B Live Associate Member FV-195 "ROSSIYA AIRLINES" JSC D Live IATA Airline 2I-681 21 AIR LLC C Live ACH XD-A39 617436 BC LTD DBA FREIGHTLINK EXPRESS C Live ACH 4O-837 ABC AEROLINEAS S.A. DE C.V. B Suspended Non-IATA Airline M3-549 ABSA - AEROLINHAS BRASILEIRAS S.A. C Live ACH XB-B11 ACCELYA AMERICA B Live Associate Member XB-B81 ACCELYA FRANCE S.A.S D Live Associate Member XB-B05 ACCELYA MIDDLE EAST FZE B Live Associate Member XB-B40 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS AMERICAS INC B Live Associate Member XB-B52 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS INDIA LTD. D Live Associate Member XB-B28 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B70 ACCELYA UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B86 ACCELYA WORLD, S.L.U D Live Associate Member 9B-450 ACCESRAIL AND PARTNER RAILWAYS D Live Associate Member XB-280 ACCOUNTING CENTRE OF CHINA AVIATION B Live Associate Member XB-M30 ACNA D Live Associate Member XB-B31 ADB SAFEGATE AIRPORT SYSTEMS UK LTD. A Live Associate Member JP-165 ADRIA AIRWAYS D.O.O. D Suspended Non-IATA Airline A3-390 AEGEAN AIRLINES S.A. D Live IATA Airline KH-687 AEKO KULA LLC C Live ACH EI-053 AER LINGUS LIMITED B Live IATA Airline XB-B74 AERCAP HOLDINGS NV B Live Associate Member 7T-144 AERO EXPRESS DEL ECUADOR - TRANS AM B Live Non-IATA Airline XB-B13 AERO INDUSTRIAL SALES COMPANY B Live Associate Member P5-845 AERO REPUBLICA S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • G410020002/A N/A Client Ref
    Solicitation No. - N° de l'invitation Amd. No. - N° de la modif. Buyer ID - Id de l'acheteur G410020002/A N/A Client Ref. No. - N° de réf. du client File No. - N° du dossier CCC No./N° CCC - FMS No./N° VME G410020002 G410020002 RETURN BIDS TO: Title – Sujet: RETOURNER LES SOUMISSIONS À: PURCHASE OF AIR CARRIER FLIGHT MOVEMENT DATA AND AIR COMPANY PROFILE DATA Bids are to be submitted electronically Solicitation No. – N° de l’invitation Date by e-mail to the following addresses: G410020002 July 8, 2019 Client Reference No. – N° référence du client Attn : [email protected] GETS Reference No. – N° de reference de SEAG Bids will not be accepted by any File No. – N° de dossier CCC No. / N° CCC - FMS No. / N° VME other methods of delivery. G410020002 N/A Time Zone REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Sollicitation Closes – L’invitation prend fin Fuseau horaire DEMANDE DE PROPOSITION at – à 02 :00 PM Eastern Standard on – le August 19, 2019 Time EST F.O.B. - F.A.B. Proposal To: Plant-Usine: Destination: Other-Autre: Canadian Transportation Agency Address Inquiries to : - Adresser toutes questions à: Email: We hereby offer to sell to Her Majesty the Queen in right [email protected] of Canada, in accordance with the terms and conditions set out herein, referred to herein or attached hereto, the Telephone No. –de téléphone : FAX No. – N° de FAX goods, services, and construction listed herein and on any Destination – of Goods, Services, and Construction: attached sheets at the price(s) set out thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • CORSIA Aeroplane Operator to State Attributions
    CORSIA Aeroplane Operator to State Attributions This is a preliminary version of the ICAO document “CORSIA Aeroplane Operator to State Attributions” that has been prepared to support the timely implementation of CORSIA from 1 January 2019. It contains aeroplane operators with international flights, and to which State they are attributed, based on information reported by States by 30 November 2018 in accordance with the Environmental Technical Manual (Doc 9501), Volume IV – Procedures for Demonstrating Compliance with the CORSIA, Chapter 3, Table 3-1. Terms used in the tables on the following pages are: • Aeroplane Operator Name is the full name of the aeroplane operator as reported by the State; • Attribution Method is one of three options as selected by the State: "ICAO Designator", "Air Operator Certificate" or "Place of Juridical Registration" in accordance with Annex 16 – Environmental Protection, Volume IV – Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA), Part II, Chapter 1, 1.2.4; and • Identifier is associated with each Attribution Method as reported by the State: o If the Attribution Method is "ICAO Designator", the Identifier is the aeroplane operator's three-letter designator according to ICAO Doc 8585; o If the Attribution Method is "Air Operator Certificate", the Identifier is the number of the AOC (or equivalent) of the aeroplane operator; o If the Attribution Method is "Place of Juridical Registration", the Identifier is the name of the State where the aeroplane operator is registered as juridical person. Disclaimer: The designations employed and the presentation of the material presented herein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of ICAO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Total Mahb Group Traffic 2015
    Annual Report 2015 309 TOTAL MAHB GROUP TRAFFIC 2015 PASSENGER MOVEMENTS 2015 2014 +/- MY passengers [international] 40,044,823 40,149,537 -0.3% [domestic] 43,784,946 43,198,466 1.4% [Total] 83,829,769 83,348,003 0.6% ISG passengers [international] 9,703,594 8,603,626 12.8% [domestic] 18,581,984 15,028,257 23.6% [Total] 28,285,578 23,631,883 19.7% Total MAHB Group 112,115,347 106,979,886 4.8% AIRCRAFT MOVEMENTS 2015 2014 +/- MY commercial aircraft [international] 295,485 287,893 2.6% [domestic] 519,855 503,669 3.2% [Total] 815,340 791,562 3.0% ISG commercial aircraft [international] 76,548 66,991 14.3% [domestic] 129,632 105,817 22.5% [Total] 206,180 172,808 19.3% Total commercial aircraft 1,021,520 964,370 5.9% MY All other aircraft 123,373 137,171 -10.1% ISG All other aircraft 12,446 12,569 -1.0% Total MAHB Group 1,157,339 1,114,110 3.9% CARGO MOVEMENTS [kg] 2015 2014 +/- MY cargo movements [international] 780,457,278 823,010,848 -5.2% [domestic] 193,872,919 184,452,041 5.1% [Total] 974,330,197 1,007,462,889 -3.3% ISG cargo movements [international] 41,773,091 37,873,360 10.3% [domestic] 4,905,686 4,505,520 8.9% [Total] 46,678,777 42,378,880 10.1% Total MAHB Group 1,021,008,974 1,049,841,769 -2.7% Note : MY - MAHB Airports in Malaysia ISG - Istanbul Sabiha Gokcen International Airport 310 Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad TRAFFIC 2015 MALAYSIA OPERATIONS PASSENGER MOVEMENTS 2015 2014 +/- Terminal passengers [international] 39,716,390 39,780,623 -0.2% Terminal passengers [domestic] 43,649,823 42,981,566 1.6% Transit passengers 463,556
    [Show full text]
  • Aero Ae 45 & Ae
    This production list is presented to you by the editorial team of "Soviet Transports" - current to the beginning of January 2021. Additions and corrections are welcome at [email protected] Aero Ae 45 & Ae 145 181 Ae 45 built by Aero at Prague-Vysocany from 1947 to 1951 The c/n consisted of the year of manufacture and a sequential number. 1 OK-BCA Ae 45 Aero f/f 21jul47 the first prototype; rgd 11sep47; underwent trials with the SVZÚ sep47 OK-BCA Ae 45 Ministers. dopravy trf unknown Ministry of Transport OK-BCA Ae 45 CSA trf unknown canx 1953 2 OK-CCA Ae 45 Aero rgd 09apr48 the second prototype; f/f 12mar48 OK-CCA Ae 45 Celulozka Bratisl. trf unknown Celulozka Bratislava; canx 1958 not known Ae 45 Czechoslovak AF trf unknown 49 003 G-007 (1) Ae 45 Hungarian AF d/d 15may49 HA-AEB Ae 45 MÉM Rep. Szolgálat trf 06apr52 Hungarian Flying Association; damaged 29apr52 when the landing gear broke HA-AEB Ae 45 OMSZ trf 18jun57 Hungarian Air Ambulance; w/o (or canx ?) 22nov62 49 004 OK-DCB Ae 45 rgd 21apr49 canx to Italy I-CRES Ae 45 Aero Club Milano rgd 18jul59 Aero Club Milano of Linate; owner also reported as Franco Rol; based at Torino; canx 1970 F-GFYA Ae 45 Pierre Cavassilas res aug88 Pierre Cavassilas of Chavenay; possibly never fully registered F-AZJX Ae 45 Pierre Cavassilas rgd 08jul94 seen Chavenay 20may94 with a 'W' taped over the 'A' of the registration; still current in 2007; under restoration near Paris in 2008; was to be reflown jan09; seen Compiègne 19jun09 and 27jun09 in all-grey c/s with large blue registration, in great condition; seen Soissons-Courmelles 28may12 with smaller black registration; l/n Compiègne 15jun13, active 49 005 OK-DCA Ae 45 rgd 23apr49 I-AERA Ae 45 Luigi Leone rgd 11oct61 based at Torino 49 006 HB-EKF Ae 45 Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Instruments for Reducing Aircraft Noise Theoretical Framework
    European LCCs going hybrid: An empirical survey Roland Conrady, Frank Fichert and Richard Klophaus Worms University of Applied Sciences, Germany Competence Center Aviation Management (CCAM) Airneth Annual Conference The Hague, April 14, 2011 Agenda • Motivation/Background • Textbook definition of pure/archetypical LCC • Data for empirical survey • Empirical results: Classification of airline’s business models • Conclusions/discussion Roland Conrady, Frank Fichert, Richard Klophaus – European LCCs going hybrid – The Hague, April 14, 2011 2 Motivation / Background • Significant (and still growing) market share of LCCs in Europe. • Obviously different strategies within the LCC segment. • Market observers see trends towards “hybridization” and/or “converging business models”,e.g.: “On many fronts - pricing, product offering, distribution, fleet, network design and even cost structure - the previously obvious and often blatant differences between budget and legacy carriers are now no longer so apparent. This has resulted from the movement of both parties in the same direction, toward the mainstream middle.” Airline Business, May 2009 (emphasis added). Roland Conrady, Frank Fichert, Richard Klophaus – European LCCs going hybrid - The Hague, April 14, 2011 3 Motivation / Background • Dynamic market environment with recent changes, e.g. some LCCs offering transfer flights or can be booked via GDS. • Yet, very limited empirical analysis of “hybridization”. Roland Conrady, Frank Fichert, Richard Klophaus – European LCCs going hybrid - The Hague, April 14, 2011 4 Aim of the paper It is examined • to what extent carriers today blend low-cost characteristics with the business characteristics of traditional full-service airlines, and • which characteristics remain distinct between LCCs and traditional full-service airlines and which tend to be common for all carriers.
    [Show full text]
  • Total Icelandair Passenger Flights: Icelandair's Management Information System
    The Impact of Coordination and Relationships in an Outsourcing Environment: The Airline Departure Process by T6mas Ingason B.S. Industrial Engineering University of Iceland Submitted to the Engineering Systems Division in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Engineering in Logistics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2006 O 2006 T6mas Ingason All rights reserved The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. ~HWS Signature of Author ......................................................:. ..W .-. .."... .......................-C .a.. .....*.......... Engineering Systems Division May 12,2006 Certified by ................................................................................. ..-. ..*...................................b.. ... Dr. R. John Hansman, Jr. Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Director, International Center for Air Tr sportation / 2The#pervisor Accepted by ........................................................................................... Yossi Sheffi Professor of Civil Professor of Engineering Systems Director, MIT Center for Transportation and Logistics The Impact of Coordination and Relationships in an Outsourcing Environment: The Airline Departure Process Tbmas Ingason Submitted to the Engineering Systems Division on May 12,2006 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Engineering in Logistics Abstract Complicated business
    [Show full text]
  • Ryanair to Partner with Niki Lauda to Develop Laudamotion Airline in Austria
    50SKYSHADESImage not found or type unknown- aviation news RYANAIR TO PARTNER WITH NIKI LAUDA TO DEVELOP LAUDAMOTION AIRLINE IN AUSTRIA News / Airlines Image not found or type unknown Ryanair Holdings Plc today (20 Mar) announced that it has entered into a binding agreement with Mr Niki Lauda to support his plan to develop and grow LaudaMotion GmbH, an Austrian Airline based in Vienna. LaudaMotion is an Austrian AOC holder owned by Niki Lauda, which has recently acquired many© 2015-2021 of the 50SKYSHADES.COM assets, including — Reproduction, A320 aircraft, copying, or of redistribution the former for commercial Niki Airline, purposes and is prohibited. will shortly start1 a range of scheduled and charter services from Germany, Austria and Switzerland primarily to Mediterranean leisure destinations. Under this agreement Ryanair will acquire an initial 24.9% stake in LaudaMotion and this will rise as soon as possible to 75% subject to EU Competition approval. Niki Lauda will chair the Board of the airline and oversee the implementation of his strategy to build a successful Austrian low fares airline. Ryanair will provide financial and management support to LaudaMotion as well as 6 wet-lease aircraft for S2018 to enable LaudaMotion to complete an extensive 21 aircraft flying program. The cost of this 75% investment in LaudaMotion (if approved by the EU) will be less than €50m although Ryanair will provide an additional €50m for year 1 start up and operating costs. Both Mr Lauda and Ryanair will work with the existing management team of LaudaMotion and expect the airline to reach profitability by year 3 of operations if their plan to grow the business to a fleet of at least 30 Airbus aircraft is successful.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Report on Investigation of the Accident Involving Viking Air Dhc-6-300, 8Qrae Aircraft at Velana International Airport, Maldives
    ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION COORDINATING COMMITTEE AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT 2021/01 PRELIMINARY REPORT ON INVESTIGATION OF THE ACCIDENT INVOLVING VIKING AIR DHC-6-300, 8QRAE AIRCRAFT AT VELANA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, MALDIVES on 14th February 2021 Preliminary Report on accident involving 8Q-RAE AICC Maldives INTRODUCTION Maldives is a signatory to the Convention on International Civil Aviation (Chicago, 1944) which established the principles and arrangements for the safe and orderly development of international air transport. Article 26 of the Convention obligates Signatories to investigate accidents to civil aircraft occurring in their State. This report is based upon the investigation carried out by the Accident Investigation Coordinating Committee (AICC) in accordance with Annex 13 to the Convention, the Civil Aviation Act 2/2001 and the Civil Aviation Regulations. The sole objective of the investigation of an accident or incident is prevention of accidents and serious incidents and it shall not be the purpose of this activity to apportion blame or liability. The AICC was assisted by MCAA, MACL and Manta Air Pvt Ltd. All timings in this report are in local time unless otherwise stated. Time difference between local and UTC is +5 hours. The report is released on 28 March 2021. Mr. Abdul Razzak Idris Chairperson Accident Investigation Coordinating Committee Page 2 of 19 28 March 2021 Preliminary Report on accident involving 8Q-RAE AICC Maldives TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Procedure for the Temporary Limitation of the Airport
    Procedure - TEMPORARY LIMITATION OF THE AIRPORT CAPACITY FURTHER TO OPERATIONAL Rev. 5 dated IRREGULARITIES 18/10/2019 (TRANSLATION PROVIDED FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY - IN CASE OF ANY CONFLICT, THE ITALIAN TEXT SHALL PREVAIL) PROCEDURES FOR THE TEMPORARY LIMITATION OF THE AIRPORT CAPACITY FURTHER TO OPERATIONAL IRREGULARITIES Temporary limitation of the airport capacity further to operational irregularities Page 1 of 20 Procedure - TEMPORARY LIMITATION OF THE AIRPORT CAPACITY FURTHER TO OPERATIONAL Rev. 5 dated IRREGULARITIES 18/10/2019 (TRANSLATION PROVIDED FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY - IN CASE OF ANY CONFLICT, THE ITALIAN TEXT SHALL PREVAIL) Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 3 1.1. Purpose .......................................................................................................................... 3 2. FIUMICINO AIRPORT’S CAPACITY .................................................................. 4 2.1. Sudden limitation on the capacity of the airport(LIMITATION WITH A DURATION OF LESS THAN 2 HOURS) ..................................................................................................... 4 2.1.1 Tactical handling further to sudden limitation of the capacity of the airport ..................... 5 3. AIRPORT CAPACITY CONTROL COMMITTEE (ACC) ......................................... 8 3.1. General duties of the committee members ................................................................10 3.2. Action of the committee
    [Show full text]