Harding, Matthew Ryan, Ms May 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Harding, Matthew Ryan, Ms May 2017 HARDING, MATTHEW RYAN, M.S. MAY 2017 GEOLOGY A GEOPHYSICAL STUDY OF UPPER SILURIAN SALINA GROUP IN NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA (135 pp) Thesis Advisor: Chris Rowan The Upper Silurian Salina Group in Pennsylvania’s Appalachian basin consists of 2,000+ feet of salt, which have been a significant influence on the tectonic & structural development of the Appalachian Mountains during the late Paleozoic. Understanding how halokinesis and décollement thrusting within the Salina Group has contributed to the present‐day structure of the Appalachian Basin is of great importance due the organic‐rich shale plays (Marcellus and Utica) currently being explored and developed within this region. Given that most of the seismic data collected from this region was before the advent of high-resolution 3D seismic surveys, a more detailed investigation of structures associated with the Salina Group was warranted. Based on preliminary examination of seismic data from North‐Central Pennsylvania, I propose that the reactivation of basement faults during the Allegheny orogeny influenced halokinesis in the overlying Salina, and therefore acted as a control on the development of the salt cored anticlines and associated faulting in the overlying units. This was tested by detailed mapping of structures in the basement and in the Paleozoic sequence above and below the Salina, noting any spatial associations between the structures. Isochronopach maps and profiles were created and analyzed, to constrain the deformation of the Salina Group. Several faults were found within three primary stratigraphic sections of the seismic volume. Those are the above Salina Group (AB1 and AB2), Salina Group (S1, S2, and S3), and basement (B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, and B6). Along with T1, sub-divided into three stratigraphic sections; faulting ~50ms TWTT above top of basement; monoclinal folding and faulting within the Trenton-Black River Group; and faulting between ~1.5-1.8s TWTT. Further a pop-down structure is formed by salt evacuation between S1 and S2 is found from Inline 300 to Inline 90, being most developed at Inline 95 and 90. Structures found within the 3D volume suggests indirect basement control on Salina development. Along with the development of the pop-down structure of the S1/S2 complex further offer evidence of basement influence. Results appear to strengthen the model put forward by Mount (2014) however result maybe only applicable this specific region. The main conclusion of the study are as follows; there is a spatial correlation between the location and development of faulting within and above the Salina Group and a structural high formed by Neoproterozoic basement faults. With the intersection of B1 and B6 associated with the SW ends of S1 and S2, where above the S1 and S2 propagate highest upwards, and where AB2 initiates above where S1 offsets Tully Limestone above this B1/B6 intersection. This suggests that the location of Salina Group faulting is the resultant influence of Grenville basement topography caused by Neoproterozoic rifting. There is also evidence of diffuse deformation below Salina décollement in the same location T1, whose features are most common below the S1/S2 pop- down and above the B1/B6 intersection. Where the changes in overburden thickness due to basement structures acted as foci for later Salina deformation during the Alleghanian orogeny. A GEOPHYSICAL STUDY OF UPPER SILURIAN SALINA GROUP IN NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA. A thesis submitted To Kent State University in partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science by Matthew Ryan Harding May 2017 © Copyright All rights reserved Except for previously published materials Thesis written by Matthew Ryan Harding B.S., Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 2012 M.S., Kent State University, 2017 Approved by Dr. Chris Rowan, Assistant Professor (NTT), Ph.D., Geology, Masters Advisor Dr. Daniel Holm, Chair, Ph.D., Department of Geology Dr. James Blank, Dean, Ph.D. College of Arts and Sciences TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS v LIST OF FIGURES vii PREFACE xi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS xii 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1WHAT IS ROCK SALT? 1 1.2 HALOKINESIS 1 1.3 THE APPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN CHAIN: A BRIEF OVERVIEW 3 1.4 STRATIGRAPHY AND TECTONIC HISTORY OF PENNSYLVANIA 3 1.5 STUDY AREA 5 1.6 DETAILED STRATIGRAPHY OF THE SALINA GROUP 6 1.7 ROLE OF SALINA GROUP IN APPALACHIAN BASIN STRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT IN PENNSYLVANIA 14 1.8 AIMS 17 2. METHODOLOGY 20 2.1 SEISMIC VOLUME 20 2.2 SALINA THICKNESS MAPPING 23 3. SEISMIC RESULTS 29 3.1 REGIONAL SEISMIC VIEW 31 3.2 STRUCTURES WITHIN THE SALINA GROUP 52 3.3 SALINA THICKNESS 76 3.4 STRUCTURES ABOVE THE SALINA GROUP 83 v 3.5 BASEMENT STRUCTURES 90 3.6 DEFORMATION BETWEEN BASEMENT AND SALINA 100 4. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSIONS 103 4.1 SUMMARY OF FAULTS 103 4.2 SPATIAL CORRELATION BETWEEN BASEMENT FAULTING AND ALLEGHANY DEFORMATION. 104 4.3 MECHANISM LINKING BASEMENT STRUCTURES TO DEFORMATION ABOVE THE SALINA GROUP. 107 4.4 OTHER VIEWS ON SALINA DEVELOPMENT 109 4.5 COMPARISON WITH OBSERVED AND MODELLED BASEMENT SALT INTERACTIONS 110 4.6 PROPOSED TECTONIC HISTORY OF STUDY AREA 110 4.7 SUMMARY OF RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURES FOUND 113 4.8 CONCLUSION 113 6. WORKS CITED 115 7 APPENDIX A: SALINA CONTOUR SOURCE CODE 120 vi LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1: PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF PENNSYLVANIA 7 FIGURE 2: SCHEMATIC CROSS SECTION OF PENNSYLVANIA 8 FIGURE 3: SCHEMATIC CROSS-SECTION OF PENNSYLVANIA’S APPALACHIAN PLATEAU. 9 FIGURE 4: GENERALIZED STRATGRAPHIC COLUMN, NE PENNSYLVANIA 10 FIGURE 5: LOCATION OF SALINA SALT BASINS 11 FIGURE 6: ISOPACH MAP OF THE SALINA GROUP 12 FIGURE 7: GENERALIZED STRATIGRAPHIC COLUMN OF UPPER SILURIAN ROCKS OF NORTH CENTERAL PENNSYLVANIA 13 FIGURE 8: HYPOTHESIZED STRCUTURAL LINKAGE OF SALINA GROUP AND BASEMENT 19 FIGURE 9: SCHEMATIC SHOWING THE FULL EXTENT OF 3D SEISMIC DATA 24 FIGURE 10: SYNTHETIC WELL TIE PROCESS 25 FIGURE 11: THE TYPICAL SEISMIC REFLECTORS OF THE PICKED HORIZONS 26 FIGURE 12: A SEISMIC CROSS-SECTION 27 FIGURE 13: EXAMPLES OF ERROR OF AUTOPICK HORZIONS 28 FIGURE 14: LOCATION OF SELECT INLINES AND CROSSLINES 30 FIGURE 15A: INLINE 300 [UN-INTERPRETED] 32 FIGURE 15B: INLINE 300[INTERPRETED] 33 FIGURE 16A: INLINE 220 [UN-INTERPRETED] 34 FIGURE 16B: INLINE 220[INTERPRETED] 35 FIGURE 17A: INLINE 180 [UN-INTERPRETED] 36 vii FIGURE 17B: INLINE 180 [INTERPRETED] 37 FIGURE 18A: INLINE 115 [UN-INTERPRETED] 38 FIGURE 18B: INLINE 115 [INTERPRETED] 39 FIGURE 19A: INLINE 95 [UN-INTERPRETED] 40 FIGURE 19B: INLINE 95 [INTERPRETED] 41 FIGURE 20A: INLINE 90 [UN-INTERPRETED] 42 FIGURE 20B: INLINE 90 [INTERPRETED] 43 FIGURE 21A: INLINE 60 [UN-INTERPRETED] 44 FIGURE 21B: INLINE 60 [INTERPRETED] 45 FIGURE 22A: CROSSLINE 150 [UN-INTERPRETED] 46 FIGURE 22B: CROSSLINE 150 [INTERPRETED] 47 FIGURE 23A: CROSSLINE 180 [UN-INTERPRETED] 48 FIGURE 23B: CROSSLINE 180 [INTERPRETED] 49 FIGURE 24A: CROSSLINE 250 [UN-INTERPRETED] 50 FIGURE 24B: CROSSLINE 250 [INTERPRETED] 51 FIGURE 25A: INLINE 300 ZOOMED IN [UN-INTERPRETED] 54 FIGURE 25B: INLINE 300 ZOOMED IN [INTERPRETED] 55 FIGURE 26A: INLINE 220 ZOOMED IN [UN-INTERPRETED] 56 FIGURE 26B: INLINE 220 ZOOMED IN [INTERPRETED] 57 FIGURE 27A: INLINE 180 ZOOMED IN [UN-INTERPRETED] 58 FIGURE 27B: INLINE 180 ZOOMED IN [INTERPRETED] 59 FIGURE 28A: INLINE 115 ZOOMED IN [UN-INTERPRETED] 60 FIGURE 28B: INLINE 115 ZOOMED-IN [INTERPRETED] 61 viii FIGURE 29A: INLINE 95 ZOOMED-IN [UN-INTERPRETED] 62 FIGURE 29B: INLINE 95 ZOOMED-IN [NTERPRETED] 63 FIGURE 30A: INLINE 95 ZOOMED-IN (VERTICAL) [UN-INTERPRETED] 64 FIGURE 30B: INLINE 95 ZOOMED-IN (VERTICAL) [INTERPRETED] 65 FIGURE 31A: INLINE 90 ZOOMED-IN [UN-INTERPRETED] 66 FIGURE 31B: INLINE 90 ZOOMED-IN [INTERPRETED] 67 FIGURE 32A: INLINE 90 ZOOMED-IN (VERTICAL) [UN-INTERPRETED] 68 FIGURE 32B: INLINE 90 ZOOMED-IN (VERTICAL) [INTERPRETED] 69 FIGURE 33A: INLINE 60 ZOOMED-IN [UN-INTERPRETED] 70 FIGURE 33B: INLINE 60 ZOOMED-IN [INTERPRETED] 71 FIGURE 34A: INLINE 60 ZOOMED-IN (VERTICAL) [UN-INTERPRETED] 72 FIGURE 34B: INLINE 60 ZOOMED-IN (VERTICAL) [INTERPRETED] 73 FIGURE 35: Z-PLANE 1100MS TWTT 74 FIGURE 36: Z-PLANE SCHEMATIC OF S1, S2, AND S3 AT 1100MS TWTT 75 FIGURE 37: SALINA THICKNESS TO BOTTOM ONE 78 FIGURE 38: THICKNESS PROFILE OF VARIOUS INLINES FOR THE SALINA GROUP 79 FIGURE 39: THICKNESS PROFILE OF VARIOUS CROSSLINES FOR THE SALINA GROUP 80 FIGURE 40A: SALINA POP-DOWN AT INLINES 300, 220, AND 180 81 FIGURE 40B: SALINA POP-DOWN AT INLINES 115, 95, AND 90 82 FIGURE 41A: INLINE 220 AB1 ZOOMED IN [UN-INTERPRETED] 84 FIGURE 41B: INLINE 220 AB1 ZOOMED IN [INTERPRETED] 85 ix FIGURE 42A: INLINE 180 AB1 ZOOMED IN [UN-INTERPRETED] 86 FIGURE 42B: INLINE 180 AB1 ZOOMED IN [INTERPRETED] 87 FIGURE 43:Z-PLANE VIEW AT 625MS TWTTOF AB1 AND AB2 88 FIGURE 44: SCHEMATIC OF AB1 AND AB2 AT ~600MS TWTT 89 FIGURE 45A: CROSSLINE 180 ZOOMED IN [UN-INTERPRETED] 92 FIGURE 45B: CROSSLINE 180 ZOOMED IN [INTERPRETED] 93 FIGURE 46A: CROSSLINE 150 ZOOMED IN [UN-INTERPRETED] 94 FIGURE 46B: CROSSLINE 150 ZOOMED IN [INTERPRETED] 95 FIGURE 47A: INLINE 180 ZOOMED-IN [UN-INTERPRETED] 96 FIGURE 47B: INLINE 180 ZOOMED-IN [INTERPRETED] 97 FIGURE 48: Z-PLANE AT 2502MS TWTT 98 FIGURE 49: SCHEMATIC OF B1-B6 AND S1/S2 99 FIGURE 50: SCHEMATIC OF T1 AND T2 WITH ALL OTHER FAULTS 102 FIGURE 51: BASEMENT RIFT COMPLEX AT 2502 TWTT 105 FIGURE 52: SCHEMATIC OF PROPOSED TECTONIC HISTORY OF NORTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA. 115 x PREFACE To those that read this thesis and those that flip through to see the pretty pictures, I recommend to look at those first, please be kind to remember that this project came into being by two ancient but recurring questions. The first is a bane of professors, teaching assistants and parents everywhere, the unassailable and incontrovertible question of “why?” The second as equally profound or profane (depending on the ever-changing context) that has ever driven the fields of science ever upwards into that always ephemeral boundary of the realm of known and unknown knowledge, which is so inglorious known in the common parlance of “Um, that looks funny”.
Recommended publications
  • Exhibit 5 Town of Barton Geology and Seismicity Report Sections
    GEOLOGY AND SEISMICITY REPORT SNYDER E1-A WELL TOWN OF BARTON TIOGA COUNTY, NEW YORK Prepared for: Couch White, LLP 540 Broadway P.O. Box 22222 Albany, New York 12201 Prepared by: Continental Placer Inc. II Winners Circle Albany, New York 12205 July 25, 2017 Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Depositional Sequences and General Stratigraphic Sequence ................................................ 2 2.1.1 Upper Devonian Lithologies ........................................................................................................ 4 2.1.2 Marcellus-Hamilton ..................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.3 Tristates-Onondaga ...................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.4 Helderberg .................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.5 Oneida-Clinton-Salina ................................................................................................................. 4 2.1.6 Black River-Trenton-Utica-Frankfort .......................................................................................... 5 2.1.7 Potsdam-Beekmantown ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 3A. Major Geologic Formations in West Virginia. Allegheney And
    82° 81° 80° 79° 78° EXPLANATION West Virginia county boundaries A West Virginia Geology by map unit Quaternary Modern Reservoirs Qal Alluvium Permian or Pennsylvanian Period LTP d Dunkard Group LTP c Conemaugh Group LTP m Monongahela Group 0 25 50 MILES LTP a Allegheny Formation PENNSYLVANIA LTP pv Pottsville Group 0 25 50 KILOMETERS LTP k Kanawha Formation 40° LTP nr New River Formation LTP p Pocahontas Formation Mississippian Period Mmc Mauch Chunk Group Mbp Bluestone and Princeton Formations Ce Obrr Omc Mh Hinton Formation Obps Dmn Bluefield Formation Dbh Otbr Mbf MARYLAND LTP pv Osp Mg Greenbrier Group Smc Axis of Obs Mmp Maccrady and Pocono, undivided Burning Springs LTP a Mmc St Ce Mmcc Maccrady Formation anticline LTP d Om Dh Cwy Mp Pocono Group Qal Dhs Ch Devonian Period Mp Dohl LTP c Dmu Middle and Upper Devonian, undivided Obps Cw Dhs Hampshire Formation LTP m Dmn OHIO Ct Dch Chemung Group Omc Obs Dch Dbh Dbh Brailler and Harrell, undivided Stw Cwy LTP pv Ca Db Brallier Formation Obrr Cc 39° CPCc Dh Harrell Shale St Dmb Millboro Shale Mmc Dhs Dmt Mahantango Formation Do LTP d Ojo Dm Marcellus Formation Dmn Onondaga Group Om Lower Devonian, undivided LTP k Dhl Dohl Do Oriskany Sandstone Dmt Ot Dhl Helderberg Group LTP m VIRGINIA Qal Obr Silurian Period Dch Smc Om Stw Tonoloway, Wills Creek, and Williamsport Formations LTP c Dmb Sct Lower Silurian, undivided LTP a Smc McKenzie Formation and Clinton Group Dhl Stw Ojo Mbf Db St Tuscarora Sandstone Ordovician Period Ojo Juniata and Oswego Formations Dohl Mg Om Martinsburg Formation LTP nr Otbr Ordovician--Trenton and Black River, undivided 38° Mmcc Ot Trenton Group LTP k WEST VIRGINIA Obr Black River Group Omc Ordovician, middle calcareous units Mp Db Osp St.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy and Structure of the Subsurface Cambrian and Ordovician Carbonates of New York
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 093 640 SE 017 316 AUTHOR Rickard, Lawrence V. TITLE Stratigraphy and Structure of the Subsurface Cambrian and Ordovician Carbonates of New York. INSTITUTION New York State Education Dept., Albany. PUB DATE 73 NOTE 30p. EDRS PRICE EF-$0.75 HC-$1.85 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS Bibliographies; Earth Science; *Geology; Instruction; *Instructional Materials; *Maps; *Paleontology; Science Education IDENTIFIERS New York State Museum and Science Service ABSTRACT This publication presents a description pf 137 wells in New York State and adjacent parts of Pennsylvania. Correlations with surface exposures are established. Maps and cross sections display the thickness, structure, and stratigraphic relationships of the carbonates described. ,A paleogeologic map of New York State at the end of the Early Ordovician is presented. Two distinct series of rocks which comprise the Cambrian and Ordovician carbonates of New York'are described and studied in detail. The monograpil includes an extensive bibliography, several schematic figures and diagrams, and two appendices which give data relevant to the identification of control wells and subsurface data from control wells. (Author/EB) U S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION B WELFARE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO OUCEO EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FRO': THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGIN ATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRE SENT OFFICIAL NATIONAL INSTITUTE DI EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY Stratigraphy and Structure of .the', Subsurface Cambrian OrdoVician arbonates of New York LAWRENCE V. RICKARD NEW YORK STATE MUSEUM AND SCIENCE SERVICE MAP AND CHART SERIES NUMBER 18 The Ulu:Trill) of the Slate of New .York The Stale Education Department Albany, 1973 THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Regents of the University (with years when terms expire) 1984 JOSEPH W.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Composition, Stratigraphy, and Depositional Environments of the Black River Group (Middle Ordovician), Southwestern Ohio
    Chemical composition, stratigraphy, and depositional environments of the Black River Group (Middle Ordovician), southwestern Ohio DAVID A. STITH Ohio Geological Survey, Fountain Square, Building B, Columbus, Ohio 43224 ABSTRACT The Ohio Geological Survey's acquisition porous, very argillaceous tan to light-gray in 1971 of three mineral exploration cores dolomite with some intercalated green The chemical composition and stratig- provided a means of examining the Black shale. raphy of the Black River Group in south- River Group. The study area in southwest- Correlatives of the Trenton are the Tren- western Ohio were studied. Chemical ern Ohio (Fig. 1) (Stith, 1979) is limited to ton Limestone in Indiana and the Lexington analyses were done on two cores of the where the high-purity zones of the Black Limestone in Kentucky. The Black River Black River from Adams and Brown Coun- River generally are less than 2,000 ft deep. Group is correlative to the Black River ties, Ohio. These studies show that sub- The lithology of the Black River Group Limestone in Indiana and the High Bridge stantial reserves of high-carbonate rock was studied in detail in the three cores Group in Kentucky. The High Bridge is (96% to 98 + % CaCO:! plus MgCO,) are (Adams, Brown, and Highland Counties). composed of, in ascending order, the Camp present in the Black River at depths of less In addition, five shorter (10- to 50-ft) cores, Nelson Limestone, the Oregon Formation, than 800 ft, in proximity to Cincinnati and geophysical logs from 50 wells, and all and the Tyrone Limestone. The Wells Creek the Ohio River.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes
    35133_Geo_Michigan_Cover.qxd 11/13/07 10:26 AM Page 1 “The Geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes” is written to augment any introductory earth science, environmental geology, geologic, or geographic course offering, and is designed to introduce students in Michigan and the Great Lakes to important regional geologic concepts and events. Although Michigan’s geologic past spans the Precambrian through the Holocene, much of the rock record, Pennsylvanian through Pliocene, is miss- ing. Glacial events during the Pleistocene removed these rocks. However, these same glacial events left behind a rich legacy of surficial deposits, various landscape features, lakes, and rivers. Michigan is one of the most scenic states in the nation, providing numerous recre- ational opportunities to inhabitants and visitors alike. Geology of the region has also played an important, and often controlling, role in the pattern of settlement and ongoing economic development of the state. Vital resources such as iron ore, copper, gypsum, salt, oil, and gas have greatly contributed to Michigan’s growth and industrial might. Ample supplies of high-quality water support a vibrant population and strong industrial base throughout the Great Lakes region. These water supplies are now becoming increasingly important in light of modern economic growth and population demands. This text introduces the student to the geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes region. It begins with the Precambrian basement terrains as they relate to plate tectonic events. It describes Paleozoic clastic and carbonate rocks, restricted basin salts, and Niagaran pinnacle reefs. Quaternary glacial events and the development of today’s modern landscapes are also discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Xsec A-A Sht1of2 Layout FINAL V
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATIONS MAP 3425 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY (SHEET 1 OF 2) Explanatory pamphlet accompanies map A Ontario Allegheny Lowlands Plateau province province SEVERNE WATKINS-BEAVER LODI POINT FIRTREE DAMS ALPINE VAN ETTEN ANTICLINE ANTICLINE ANTICLINE ANTICLINE ANTICLINE ANTICLINE GLENORA SYNCLINE UNNAMED COHOCTON CORBETT POINT ENFIELD CAYUTA SYNCLINE SYNCLINE SYNCLINE SYNCLINE SYNCLINE Bend in section Bend in section Bend in section New York W SE Oatka Genesee NW SE Canisteo NW SW Pennsylvania Black Creek River Canaseraga River Tuscarora Creek Creek Creek FEET MILES 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 3,000 1 2 3 4 5 6 William Duchscherer, Jr. E.F. Blair and Associates NYS Natural Gas Company E.F. Blair and Associates Bowdoin Storage Service Inc. NYS Natural Gas Company No. 1 J. Klotzbach No. 1 L. Tyler No. 1 Albert McClurg No. 1 Arthur N. Kennedy No. 1 Hubbard No. 1 Robert Olin API No. 31-037-05117 API No. 31-037-04593 API No. 31-051-04552 API No. 31-051-04630 API No. 31-101-21496 API No. 31-101-03924 Genesee Co., New York Genesee Co., New York Livingston Co., New York Livingston Co., New York Steuben Co., New York Steuben Co., New York Perrysburg Formation Dunkirk Dunkirk Shale Shale 2,000 Member Wiscoy Sandstone Member Java Perrysburg West River Shale, Nunda Wiscoy Sandstone Member Formation Formation Genundewa Sandstone Member unnamed Pipe Creek 0 Pipe Creek shale member Limestone, Penn Member Shale Member Shale Member Perrysburg Yan Shale, and rmation Formation 0 Dun West River Shale, Java Fo kirk
    [Show full text]
  • Bedrock Maps
    1987 BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF MICHIGAN BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF EASTERN UPPER PENINSULA MACKINAC BRECCIA BOIS BLANC FORMATION GARDEN ISLAND FORMATION BASS ISLAND GROUP SALINA GROUP SAINT IGNACE DOLOMITE POINT AUX CHENES SHALE ENGADINE GROUP MANISTIQUE GROUP BURNT BLUFF GROUP KEWEENAW CABOT HEAD SHALE MANITOULIN DOLOMITE QUEENSTON SHALE BIG HILL DOLOMITE HOUGHTON STONINGTON FORMATION UTICA SHALE MEMBER COLLINGWOOD SHALE MEMBER TRENTON GROUP BLACK RIVER GROUP ONTONAGON BARAGA PRAIRIE DU CHIEN GROUP TREMPEALEAU FORMATION MUNISING FORMATION GOGEBIC LU CE MARQUETTE ALGER CHIPPEWA IRON MACKINAC SCHOOLC RAF T DELT A DICKIN SON BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF WESTERN UPPER PENINSULA MACKINAC BRECCIA JACOBSVILLE SANDSTONE EMMET MENOMINEE FREDA SANDSTONE CHEBOYGAN NONESUCH FORMATION PRESQUE ISLE COPPER HARBOR CONGLOMERATE OAK BLUFF FORMATION CHAR LEVOIX PORTAGE LAKE VOLCANICS MONTMORENCY SIEMENS CREEK FORMATION ANT RIM ALPENA INTRUSIVE OTSEGO QUINNESEC FORMATION LEELANAU PAINT RIVER GROUP RIVERTON IRON FORMATION BIJIKI IRON FORMATION GRAND TR AVERSE ALCONA KALKASKA CRAW FOR D OSCOD A NEGAUNEE IRON FORMATION BENZIE IRONWOOD IRON FORMATION DUNN CREEK FORMATION BADWATER GREENSTONE MICHIGAMME FORMATION MANISTEE WEXFORD MISSAUKEE ROSCOMMON OGEMAW IOSCO GOODRICH QUARTZITE HEMLOCK FORMATION BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF ARENAC MENOMINEE & CHOCOLAY GROUPS LOWER PENINSULA EMPEROR VULCANIC COMPLEX MASON LAKE OSCEOLA CLARE GLADWIN SIAMO SLATE & AJIBIK QUARTZITE RED BEDS HURON PALMS FORMATION GRAND RIVER FORMATION CHOCOLAY GROUP SAGINAW FORMATION BAY RANDVILLE DOLOMITE BAYPORT LIMESTONE MICHIGAN
    [Show full text]
  • WV Generalized Stratigraphic Column/Chart
    Generalized Stratigraphic Chart for West Virginia Series/ Drillers’ Era System Stage Western WV Eastern WV Terminology CENOZOIC Paleogene Eocene Igneous Intrusives MESOZOIC Jurassic Igneous Intrusives PERMIAN Dunkard Group Carroll, Minshall, Murphy, Moundsville, Upper Monongahela Fm. 1st Cow Run, Little Conemaugh Group Dunkard, Big Dunkard Burning Springs, Middle Allegheny Fm. 2nd Cow Run, Kanawha Fm. Gas Sands, Horseneck (Subsystem) New River Fm. Pottsville PENNSYLVANIAN Lower Pocahontas Fm. Group Salt Sands Bluestone Fm. Pride, Ravencliff, Avis, Princeton Ss. Mauch Chunk Maxton, Little Lime, Upper Hinton Fm. Group Pencil Cave, Blue Monday Bluefield Fm. CARBONIFEROUS Greenbrier Group Big Lime, Keener, Middle Big Injun (Subsystem) Maccrady Fm. (south) MISSISSIPPIAN Lower Big Injun, Squaw, Sunbury Sh. Price Fm. Weir, Coffee (Sunbury) Sh. Berea Ss. Cleveland Sh. Gantz, 50’, 30’, Ohio Sh. Chagrin Sh. Hampshire Group Huron Sh. Gordon Stray, Gordon, Hanover Sh. bed 4th, 5th, Bayard, Java Fm. Pipe Creek Sh. bed Greenland Foreknobs Fm. Elizabeth, Warren, Upper West Falls Fm. Angola Sh. Gap Group Scherr Fm. Speechley, Balltown, Rhinestreet Sh. Bradford, Riley, Cashaqua Sh. Sonyea Fm. Middlesex Sh. Benson, Alexander, Elk, Haverty, Genesee Fm./ West River Sh. Brallier Fm. Geneseo Sh./Burket Sh. Fox, Sycamore Harrell Sh. Harrell Sh. DEVONIAN Tully Ls. Millboro Sh. Hamilton Group Mahantango Fm. Mahantango Fm. Marcellus Sh. Marcellus Sh. Middle Tioga ash beds Tioga ash beds Huntersville Chert Needmore Sh. Onondaga Ls. Oriskany Ss. “Corniferous” Lower (west only) Helderberg Group Bass Islands Fm. Big Mountain Sh. Clifton Forge Ss. Keyser Fm. PALEOZOIC Lower Keyser Mbr. PHANEROZOIC Salina Fm. Tonoloway Fm. Newburg Wills Creek Fm. Upper Bloomsburg Williamsport Fm. Fm.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 2 (Pdf)
    South North West East West East West East West East Eastern Kentucky Central West Virginia Eastern and Central Ohio Western and Central Pennsylvania Western and Central New York Age Stratigraphy from: Repetski and others (2008) Stratigraphy from: Ryder and others (2008, 2009) Stratigraphy from: Ryder and others (2008, 2009, 2010) Stratigraphy from: Berg and others (1983); Ryder and others (2010) Stratigraphy from: Repetski and others (2008) Era System Series (Ma) Valley Valley Rome Trough Rome Trough Rome Trough and Ridge Bedford Shale and Ridge Cleveland Member Venango Group Catskill Formation 359.2 Upper Devonian strata, undivided Ohio Shale Ohio Three Lick Bed Chagrin Shale equivalent rocks Chagrin Shale Bradford Group Foreknobs Formation Perrysburg Formation Shale Dunkirk Shale Member Huron Member of Ohio Shale Huron Member Elk Group Scherr Formation Upper Dunkirk Shale Java Formation Angola Shale Member Olentangy Shale (upper) Java Formation Java Formation Angola Shale Member West Falls West Falls Brallier Formation West Falls Angola Shale Member Formation Rhinestreet Shale Member Rhinestreet Shale Member of the Formation Rhinestreet Shale Member Formation Rhinestreet Shale Member Upper Devonian strata, undivided West Falls Formation 385.3 Sonyea and Genesee Formations, undivided Sonyea and Genesee Formations, undivided Sonyea and Genesee Formations, undivided Tully Limestone Tully Limestone Tully Limestone Mahantango Formation Mahantango Formation Moscow, Ludlowville, and Skaneateles Shales, undivided Hamilton Olentangy Shale (lower)
    [Show full text]
  • Ordovician Carbonates in Central Pennsylvania, Trenton and Black
    ·. " Pennsylvania Geological Survey: Trenton Black River Carbonates: Field Trip Guidebook Page 1 of2 PA STATE AGENCIES ONLINE Trenton and Black River Carbonates in the Union Furnace Area of Blair and Huntingdon Counties, Pennsylvania A Field Trip Guidebook for the Eastern Section AAPG Annual Meeting, September 10, 2003 and the PAPG Spring Field Trip, May 26, 2004 (Return to this introduction by using the left navigation column; return from PDF* figures by using the browser "Back" button.) Introduction Ordovician carbonates in central Penns Ivania Geolo of the Union Furnace area Petroleum geochemistry Road log Stop 1 StoD2 Stop 3 Acknowledgements and references List offigures and plates Christopher D. Laughrey, Pennsylvania Geological Survey Jaime Kostelnik, Pennsylvania Geological Survey David P. Gold, Professor Emeritus, Pennsylvania State University Arnold G. Doden, Consultant, State College John A. Harper, Pennsylvania Geological Survey Edited by John A. Harper Guidebook distributed by: Pittsburgh Association of Petroleum Geologists For information on obtaining additional copies of this guidebook, contact: John A. Harper Pennsylvania Geological Survey 400 Waterfront Drive Pittsburgh, PA 15222-4745 Phone: 412-442-4230 Fax: 412-442-4298 *You will need the Acrobat Reader 6.0 or later to successfully view/print some information. This program can be downloaded to your computer for free; simply click on the "Get Acrobat Reader" button at right to download now. http://www.dcnr.state.pa.us/topogeo/tbr/tbr.aspx 1/2912008 , . Pennsylvania Geological Survey: Trenton Black River Carbonates: Field Trip Guidebook Page 2 of 2 ~ ~ . Contact · FAO http://www.dcnr.state.pa.us/topogeo/tbr/tbr.aspx 112912008 .. Pennsylvania Geological Survey: Trenton Black River Carbonates: Introduction to Carbo..
    [Show full text]
  • The Middle Ordovician Section at Crown Point Peninsula, New York
    THE MIDDLE ORDOVICIAN SECTION AT CROWN POINT PENINSULA, NEW YORK CHARLOTTE MEHRTENS Department of Geology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405 [email protected] BRUCE SELLECK Department of Geology, Colgate University, Hamilton, NY 13346 [email protected] INTRODUCTION The Chazy, Black River and Trenton Groups are a well studied sequence of fossiliferous limestones, dolostones and sandstones in the Champlain Valley of New York, Vermont and southern Quebec. These rocks record shallow water cyclic sedimentation in the foreland basin of Laurentia prior to and during the initial stages of the Taconic Orogeny. This field trip reviews the stratigraphy of these units, as well as the evidence for reconstructing depositional environments and cyclic sea level changes. THE CROWN POINT HISTORICAL SITE This field trip takes place at the scenic Crown Point Historical Site (Figure 1), a no-hammer, no-collecting locality. Approximately 120 meters of section is exposed in a combination of excavations, ridges and shoreline exposures that dip ~8° northwest. The overall stratigraphy (Figure 2) from the Crown Point Formation (Chazy Group) to the Glens Falls Formation (Trenton Group) records the Middle Ordovician transgression seen throughout the Appalachians. Correlation of this stratigraphy exposed at Crown Point to the type Trenton in central New York State is provided by Prasopora spp. (Mehrtens and Barnett, 1979). Conodonts collected from strata to the north and east (Harris, pers. comm. and Harris, et al., 1995; Roscoe, 1973) provide additional age control. Detailed sedimentologic studies of these units have been published by Bechtel and Mehrtens (1995), Mehrtens and Cuffey (2003) and MacLean (1986) and Selleck (1988).
    [Show full text]
  • ' - )/ I ·~ .T /Jjc.--I~ Or
    Senior Thesis Subsurface Stratigraphy of Middle Cambrian-Middle Ordovician Rocks in Central Morrow County, Ohio by William Camphire Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirmcnts for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Geological Sciences at The Ohio State University, Spring Quarter, 1996 Approved by: /' - )/ i ·~ .t /Jjc.--i~ Or. Loren E. Babcock Subsurface Stratigraphy of Middle Cambrian-Middle Ordovician Rocks in Central Morrow County, Ohio INTRODUCTION The purpose of this thesis is to report on a subsurface study of the Middle Cambrian to Middle Ordovician stratigraphic section in central Morrow County, Ohio. Stratigraphic units discussed are the Knox Dolomite, Wells Creek Shale, Black River Group, and the Trenton Limestone. Although the primary focus of this report is on the Knox Dolomite it is interesting to observe how its structure influenced the deposition of the overlying units. For this reason I included the other units as well. The Knox Dolomite, in particular, is a major petroleum target in Ohio. All the results are based on electric logs, which were obtained from the Ohio Geological Survey in Columbus, Ohio. LOCATION The study area is located in Mount Gilead, Franklin and Congress Townships, Morrow County, Ohio (Figures 1, 2). In Franklin Township, sections 3, 4, and 5 are in the study area. In Mount Gilead Township, sections 29 and 32 are in the study area. In Congress Township, sections 27, 28, 33, and 34 are in the study area. Location of specific wells used in this study are given in Figure 3. Also, one should note that not all of the wells located in the sections listed above were used in every part of this study.
    [Show full text]