DOCSLIB.ORG

GSA 2017 Poster Final Web

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Cross Sections From The Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership: Visualizng Subsurface Carbon Storage Opportunities Across The Central And Eastern United States Philip A. Dinterman1, Jessica Pierson Moore1, J. Eric Lewis1, Stephen F. Greb2, Kenneth G. Miller3, William J. Schmelz3 1West Virginia Geological & Economic Survey, 1 Mont Chateau Rd, Morgantown, West Virginia 26508, [email protected], 2University of Kentucky, 3Rutgers University ABSTRACT A In the fourteen years following creation of the Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (MRCSP) domestic energy A` production and CO2 point-source trends in the United States have experienced tremendous changes. Increasing use of natural gas as a source of electrical generation, coupled with the rise of renewable technologies, resulted in the closing of many coal-fired power plants. The coal-fired plants that remain open must now strike a balance between competitive economics and an increasingly climate-conscious public. These challenges necessitate a continued comprehensive, nation-wide, investigation of2 CO mitigation strategies, including carbon storage in deep saline aquifers as well as enhanced recovery of oil and natural gas via CO2 floods. In support of these efforts, MRCSP is characterizing Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) opportunities across a ten state-region in the central and eastern United States. Updating and packaging the existing database of petroleum fields in the region has been one of the Area of interest, with locations of multi- major MRCSP tasks of the West Virginia Geological and Economic channel seismic proles and wells & Survey (WVGES) across this region. coreholes available in region. Wells & Coreholes WVGES is also working with other MRCSP researchers to construct a set Continental Oshore Stratigraphic Test wells Individual well depth are in feet below Atlantic Section kelly bushing. of regional cross-sections illustrating subsurface opportunities for CO2 B-2 & B-3 (white) Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) in depleted oil fields; Enhanced Gas 29 Exploration wells 1979-1981 (red) Recovery (EGR) in organic-rich shales, and CO2 storage in deep saline DSDP, ODP, IODP, AMCOR cores aquifers. A set of three cross-sections will be delivered as part of this MRCSP region showing oil & gas elds and CO2 point sources. CO2 point sources are (blue & green) effort: a cross-section illustrating opportunities in the north-central displayed according to emission levels. reaches of the region; a central cross-section that ties into a similar 17 18 West Dominion East section constructed during earlier research; and an offshore Atlantic Trans Inc. Anadarko GL 16 No. LW-904 E&P Co. LP Minard Run Oil Co. Inc. PA Dept. of Forest No. 1 section illustrating onshore-to-offshore opportunities in the Kankakee Arch Appalachian Basin No. 1 & Waters COP GL` Findlay Arch Minard Run Tract Tract 129 Tract 286 Mid-Atlantic. These cross sections will augment existing knowledge of Great Lakes Section Towards the Allegheny Front, surficial through lower Devonian strata are folded in Illinois Indiana Indiana Ohio Ohio Pennsylvania a succession of synclines and anticlines, each with 50 to 500 ft. of fold amplitude. subsurface reservoirs across the region. For simplicity, these are not shown, but they do occur in the subsurface. Elevation (feet) South of +3,000 Gary South of South of South of Erie Fort Wayne Cleveland South Bend Toledo Sandusky When combined with results from other areas of MRCSP research, Biery and Johnson Co. Regional cross sections are only one aspect of the work undertaken in the MRCSP project. Overall, the 2 14 No. 1 Shaw, W. these cross-sections enable policy makers, researchers, and other Midwest Steel 13 Benedum Interests +2,000 WD-1 5 8 Burgoon Ss. 4 9 10 No. 1 project goals are to provide data for CCUS opportunities. Oil and gas elds have been evaluatedand Midwest Steel 3 6 7 Ohio Division of 11 The East Ohio 1 Northern Indiana Liquid Disposal Franklin Gas & Oil Co. Gas Co. Kardosh, J. constituent groups across a wide geographic area to visualize and Pfizer Chemical Co. Northern Indiana Callander & Texas Gas the Geological Jones and Laughlin 12 Huntley Midco Remedial Public Service Co. Inc. LLC No. 1 Catskill 1,000 ft. Elevation No. 2 Public Service Co. Kimbel Inc. Exploration Corp. Survey Steel Corp. ICI Americas Inc. Corp. No. 1 No. 1A No. 1 Riceville and Oswayo Formations Mountain ranked for their suitability of CO storage and/or utilization. This includes compiling characteristics (ex. No. 1 Ames, H. No. 1 No. GB-4 No. 1 Brayman, H & D Formation depth (feet) No. WD-1 Pfizer Chem. Co. Wakeland, L.M. No. 1 Ohio Liquid Krysik-Wakefield No. 1 determine the types of CCUS strategies that represent viable options 2 TE Fehan Unit M & B Asphalt Co. Jones and Laughlin Formation +1,000 Midco Rem. Corp. Hall, K. Disposal Inc. Calhio Chemicals Co. +1,000 for mitigation of CO point sources in their respective areas. porosity, permeability, API gravity, water saturation, etc.) on all elds in the MRCSP region. The elds were Steel Corp. 2 Catskill Formation MRCSP is supported by U.S. Department of Energy-National Energy then ranked, among other variables, on storage eciency and capacities. The regionalcross section are an 0 Lock Haven 2,500 ft. 0 depth Technology Laboratory Agreement No. DE-FC26-0NT42589. integral part of the evaluation of CCUS opportunities and provide a subsurface understanding of the 1,000 ft. depth Formation geology throughout the region from surface to basement. Cross section pathsand wells were selected to -1,000 Elk Group -1,000 Acknowledgements geographically cover the region, intersect important known geological features, and intersect highly Lock Haven -2,000 Formation ranked elds and/or areas. There is only a small number of wells that penetrate to basement in the deeper 2,500 ft. depth The authors would like to thank Battelle Memorial Institute who oversees Kerbel t -2,000 Formation n ro e parts of the Appalachian basin and most were not recently drilled. Also, where applicable, MRCSP used -3,000 n F e zo n n y e o zo n ti n n Mount Simon Sandstone o zo lt jec the MRCSP contract as well as all of the partner states (DE, IN, KY, MD, ti n Mount Simon Sandstone n Grenville Province I o au jec interpretations from the U.S. Geological Survey regional cross sections. These cross sections are used to ti n F I jec (Precambrian) -3,000 n n I eghe l -4,000 ree Al G dene, visualize, and evaluate the many reservoirs in the MRCSP region for potential CCUS opportunities. Middle Run Formation MI, PA, OH, & Rutgers University) for their contributions. Kristin Carter ng (Precambrian) li Stratigraphic column for the Coastal Plain and Oshore portion of w Brallier Bo Formation (PA), Stephen Greb (KY), John Harper (PA), Chris Lombardi (Rutgers), the MRCSP region. Units are labeled by lithology. -5,000 -4,000 ? 0 50 miles Upper Shale Harrell Mbr. Fm. Cristian Medina (IN), Ken Miller (Rutgers), John Rupp (IN), Michael Solis Burket Mbr. -5,000 0 80 kilometers Tully Limestone Grenville Front lt t au Hamilton n F g ro r Group F (OH), Thomas Sparks (KY) in particular had significant input on the cross u y leb Marcellus Shale n -6,000 dd Onondaga Formation i ? Needmore Shale M eghe CABMichigan Indiana Ohio West Virginia CAB` Oriskany Sandstone l Shriver Chert Al sections displayed here. Stratigraphic Column for the Michigan and Appalachian basins portion of the MRCSP Relative Depth Relative Depth Keyser Formation 9 of meters feet feet meters Ohio t Campbells Run - s 1000 API# 34-013-00586 11 12 1000 -7,000 ea region. Units are labeled by type and/or CO sequestration/EOR target and conning 7 elevation: 10 Miracle Run / West Virginia West Virginia 2 3000 5 Ohio 8 680ft / 207 Kb West Virginia Rockport / API# 47-049-00244 API# 47-077-00119 3000 Condit Ragtown / elevation: ting 1 2 3 4 Ohio API# 34-031-22053 Ohio Class V CO2 injection API# 47-051-00539 elevation: Indiana Indiana 6 elevation: API# 34-067-20737 test well (MRCSP project) elevation: Hixenbaugh New Freeport 1,362ft / 415m Kb 2,172ft / 662m Kb ? ? Michigan Indiana IGS# 63691 aul Ohio Oil Field f layers. IGS# 133708 IGS# 133540 Gratiot - elevation: Oil Fields MRCSP region states diplaying yearly emissons by state and within state by emissions API# 21-149-31335 IGS# 159232 API# 34-003-63691 1,040ft / 317m Kb 1,435ft / 437m Kb API# 34-117-20012 ? d Newcastle Consolidated / Target: Target: wn elevation: elevation: elevation: elevation: elevation: Kokosing River / 898ft / 274m Kb Key elevation: o Monroe - Gordon Ss. / Conemaugh Grp. / an 856ft / 261m Kb 797ft / 243m Kb 892ft / 272m Kb 943ft / 287m Kb 871ft / 265m Kb Barney Run / Consolidated Cameron - h -8,000 2000 1,016ft / 310m Kb Coshocton Consolidated 4th Ss / 5th Ss. Venango Fm. ? s Millwood Consolidated Gilmore Salem, North Oil Field 2000 Becket Garner Mississippian n type. Oil Fields lt ? Lima Consolidated Oil Fields Oil Field Oil Field Target: Maxville Ls. / Consolidated Oil Field th Mississippian Target: Clinton Ss. Permian Pennsylvanian Oswayo au olding Oil Field Target: Berea Ss. t Target: Berea Ss. Target: Oriskany Ss. F 500 Oil Field Keener Ss. / Target: f 500 Fm. ? n Target: Trenton Ls. Target: Berea Ss. Big Injun Ss. Gordon Ss. n o ro Pennsylvanian i ? Devonian ale F n c Dunkard Group U s ? - 1000 Ground level t 1000 e n the -9,000 u g y . Dunkard Group Glacial Deposits r Quaternary o k V V . of c io M W W Conemaugh Group La Michigan Indiana Indiana Kentucky Ohio Kentucky Ohio u Kentucky West Virginia Ohio Ohio Pennsylvania Monongahela Group t P3` Devonian - t Berea Ss.
Recommended publications
  • Recent Fossil Finds in the Indian Islands Group, Central Newfoundland

    Recent Fossil Finds in the Indian Islands Group, Central Newfoundland

    Current Research (2006) Newfoundland and Labrador Department of Natural Resources Geological Survey, Report 06-1, pages 221-231 RECENT FOSSIL FINDS IN THE INDIAN ISLANDS GROUP, CENTRAL NEWFOUNDLAND 1W.D. Boyce, P.Geo. and 2W.L. Dickson, P.Geo. 1Regional Geology Section 2Mineral Deposits Section ABSTRACT During the 2004 and 2005 field seasons a number of fossiliferous exposures of the Indian Islands Group rocks were exam- ined. The results of these fossil surveys are presented here. The occurrence of the bryozoan Stictopora scalpellum (Lonsdale, 1839) in many outcrops of the Silurian Indian Islands Group definitively dates these exposures as latest Wenlock (late Home- rian). Several richly fossiliferous localities yield faunas indicative of Wenlock, late Wenlock (Homerian), and middle Ludlow (late Gorstian to early Ludfordian) ages. INTRODUCTION Dudley, West Midlands, England, of late Homerian (latest Wenlock) age (Snell, 2004, page 6, Text-Figure 4). There is as yet no comprehensive, integrated lithostrati- graphic–biostratigraphic scheme for the Silurian shelly fau- Boyce (2004, page 7) identified Ptilodictya scalpellum nas of the Indian Islands Group (IIG). Furthermore, apart Lonsdale, 1839 from a sawdust-filled quarry near Glenwood from this report, the most extensive recent paleontological (JOD-2003-113 and LD05-0064 - see Plates 2 and 3) as well studies of the area remain those of Boyce et al. (1993), as from drill core at the Beaver Brook antimony mine Boyce and Ash (1994) and Donovan et al. (1997). (2004F016 - see Plate 4). During the summers of 2004 and 2005, Stictopora scalpellum (Lonsdale, 1839) was also iden- In 2004, a total of six days was spent in the field with tified from a number of additional IIG outcrops, including: G.C.
  • Hydrogeology and Stratigraphy of the Dakota Formation in Northwest Iowa

    Hydrogeology and Stratigraphy of the Dakota Formation in Northwest Iowa

    WATER SUPPLY HYDROGEOLOGY AND J.A. MUNTER BULLETIN G.A. LUDVIGSON NUMBER 13 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE B.J. BUNKER 1983 DAKOTA FORMATION IN NORTHWEST IOWA Iowa Geological Survey Donald L. Koch State Geologist and Director 123 North Capitol Street Iowa City, Iowa 52242 IOWA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY BULLETIN NO. 13 1983 HYDROGEOLOGY AND STRATIGRAPHY OF THE DAKOTA FORMATION IN NORTHWEST IOWA J. A. Munter G. A. Ludvigson B. J. Bunker Iowa Geological Survey Iowa Geological Survey Donald L. Koch Director and State Geologist 123 North Capitol Street Iowa City, Iowa 52242 Foreword An assessment of the quantity and quality of water available from the Dakota (Sandstone) Formation 1n northwest Iowa is presented in this report. The as sessment was undertaken to provide quantitative information on the hydrology of the Dakota aquifer system to the Iowa Natural Resources Council for alloca tion of water for irrigation, largely as a consequence of the 1976-77 drought. Most area wells for domestic, livestock, and irrigation purposes only partial ly penetrated the Dakota Formation. Consequently, the long-term effects of significant increases in water withdrawals could not be assessed on the basis of existing wells. Acquisition of new data was based upon a drilling program designed to penetrate the entire sequence of Dakota sediments at key loca tions, after a thorough inventory and analysis of existing data. Definition of the distribution, thickness, and lateral and vertical changes in composition of the Dakota Formation has permitted the recognition of two mem bers. Additionally, Identification of the rock units that underlie the Dakota Formation has contributed greatly to our knowledge of the regional geology of northwest Iowa and the upper midwest.
  • Geology of the Devonian Marcellus Shale—Valley and Ridge Province

    Geology of the Devonian Marcellus Shale—Valley and Ridge Province

    Geology of the Devonian Marcellus Shale—Valley and Ridge Province, Virginia and West Virginia— A Field Trip Guidebook for the American Association of Petroleum Geologists Eastern Section Meeting, September 28–29, 2011 Open-File Report 2012–1194 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Geology of the Devonian Marcellus Shale—Valley and Ridge Province, Virginia and West Virginia— A Field Trip Guidebook for the American Association of Petroleum Geologists Eastern Section Meeting, September 28–29, 2011 By Catherine B. Enomoto1, James L. Coleman, Jr.1, John T. Haynes2, Steven J. Whitmeyer2, Ronald R. McDowell3, J. Eric Lewis3, Tyler P. Spear3, and Christopher S. Swezey1 1U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA 20192 2 James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807 3 West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey, Morgantown, WV 26508 Open-File Report 2012–1194 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Ken Salazar, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report.
  • Stratigraphic Succession in Lower Peninsula of Michigan

    Stratigraphic Succession in Lower Peninsula of Michigan

    STRATIGRAPHIC DOMINANT LITHOLOGY ERA PERIOD EPOCHNORTHSTAGES AMERICANBasin Margin Basin Center MEMBER FORMATIONGROUP SUCCESSION IN LOWER Quaternary Pleistocene Glacial Drift PENINSULA Cenozoic Pleistocene OF MICHIGAN Mesozoic Jurassic ?Kimmeridgian? Ionia Sandstone Late Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Conemaugh Grand River Formation Geological Survey Division Late Harold Fitch, State Geologist Pennsylvanian and Saginaw Formation ?Pottsville? Michigan Basin Geological Society Early GEOL IN OG S IC A A B L N Parma Sandstone S A O G C I I H E C T I Y Bayport Limestone M Meramecian Grand Rapids Group 1936 Late Michigan Formation Stratigraphic Nomenclature Project Committee: Mississippian Dr. Paul A. Catacosinos, Co-chairman Mark S. Wollensak, Co-chairman Osagian Marshall Sandstone Principal Authors: Dr. Paul A. Catacosinos Early Kinderhookian Coldwater Shale Dr. William Harrison III Robert Reynolds Sunbury Shale Dr. Dave B.Westjohn Mark S. Wollensak Berea Sandstone Chautauquan Bedford Shale 2000 Late Antrim Shale Senecan Traverse Formation Traverse Limestone Traverse Group Erian Devonian Bell Shale Dundee Limestone Middle Lucas Formation Detroit River Group Amherstburg Form. Ulsterian Sylvania Sandstone Bois Blanc Formation Garden Island Formation Early Bass Islands Dolomite Sand Salina G Unit Paleozoic Glacial Clay or Silt Late Cayugan Salina F Unit Till/Gravel Salina E Unit Salina D Unit Limestone Salina C Shale Salina Group Salina B Unit Sandy Limestone Salina A-2 Carbonate Silurian Salina A-2 Evaporite Shaley Limestone Ruff Formation
  • CONTROLS on DOLOMITIZATION of the UPPER ORDOVICIAN TRENTON LIMESTONE in SOUTH-CENTRAL KENTUCKY COLLIN JAMES GRAY Department Of

    CONTROLS on DOLOMITIZATION of the UPPER ORDOVICIAN TRENTON LIMESTONE in SOUTH-CENTRAL KENTUCKY COLLIN JAMES GRAY Department Of

    CONTROLS ON DOLOMITIZATION OF THE UPPER ORDOVICIAN TRENTON LIMESTONE IN SOUTH-CENTRAL KENTUCKY COLLIN JAMES GRAY Department of Geological Sciences APPROVED: Dr. Katherine Giles, Ph.D., Chair Dr. Richard Langford, Ph.D. Dr. Matthew Johnston, Ph.D. Charles Ambler, Ph.D. Dean of the Graduate School Copyright © by Collin James Gray 2015 Dedication I dedicate my thesis work to my family. My dedicated and loving parents, Michael and Deborah Gray have always supported me and provided words of encouragement during the struggles of my research. The support provided was second to none and I could not imagine reaching this point in my education without them. I also dedicate this thesis to my two brothers, Michael and Nathan Gray and my sister Nicole Gray. Without these role models I cannot imagine where my education would have ended. I will always appreciate the support provided by all three of you and consider you to be role models that I can always look up to. CONTROLS ON DOLOMITIZATION OF THE UPPER ORDOVICIAN TRENTON LIMESTONE IN SOUTH-CENTRAL KENTUCKY by COLLIN JAMES GRAY, B.S. GEOLOGY THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at El Paso in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Geological Sciences THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO December 2015 Acknowledgements I wish to thank my committee whose time and expertise provided excellent input into my research. Dr. Katherine Giles, my M.S. supervisor provided guidance and provided endless suggestions and recommendations throughout my research while continuously motivating me to continue my education.
  • Exhibit 5 Town of Barton Geology and Seismicity Report Sections

    Exhibit 5 Town of Barton Geology and Seismicity Report Sections

    GEOLOGY AND SEISMICITY REPORT SNYDER E1-A WELL TOWN OF BARTON TIOGA COUNTY, NEW YORK Prepared for: Couch White, LLP 540 Broadway P.O. Box 22222 Albany, New York 12201 Prepared by: Continental Placer Inc. II Winners Circle Albany, New York 12205 July 25, 2017 Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Depositional Sequences and General Stratigraphic Sequence ................................................ 2 2.1.1 Upper Devonian Lithologies ........................................................................................................ 4 2.1.2 Marcellus-Hamilton ..................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.3 Tristates-Onondaga ...................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.4 Helderberg .................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.5 Oneida-Clinton-Salina ................................................................................................................. 4 2.1.6 Black River-Trenton-Utica-Frankfort .......................................................................................... 5 2.1.7 Potsdam-Beekmantown ..............................................................................................................
  • IC-29 Geology and Ground Water Resources of Walker County, Georgia

    IC-29 Geology and Ground Water Resources of Walker County, Georgia

    IC 29 GEORGIA STATE DIVISION OF CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINING AND GEOLOGY GARLAND PEYTON, Director THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Information Circular 29 GEOLOGY AND GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF WALKER COUNTY, GEORGIA By Charles W. Cressler U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Geological Survey ATLANTA 1964 CONTENTS Page Abstract _______________________________________________ -··---------------------------- _____________________ ----------------·----- _____________ __________________________ __ 3 In trodu ction ------------------------------------------ ________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Purpose and scope ------------------------------"--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Previous inv es tigati o ns ____ _____ ________ _______ __________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5 Geo Io gy _________________________________________________________________ --- ___________________ -- ___________ ------------- __________________ ---- _________________ ---- _______ 5 Ph ys i ogr a p hy ______________________________________________________ ---------------------------------------- __________________ -------------------------------- 5 Geo Io gi c his tory __________________________ _ __ ___ ___ _______ _____________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------- 5 Stratigraphy -·· __________________
  • Geologic Cross Section C–C' Through the Appalachian Basin from Erie

    Geologic Cross Section C–C' Through the Appalachian Basin from Erie

    Geologic Cross Section C–C’ Through the Appalachian Basin From Erie County, North-Central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge Province, Bedford County, South-Central Pennsylvania By Robert T. Ryder, Michael H. Trippi, Christopher S. Swezey, Robert D. Crangle, Jr., Rebecca S. Hope, Elisabeth L. Rowan, and Erika E. Lentz Scientific Investigations Map 3172 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Ryder, R.T., Trippi, M.H., Swezey, C.S. Crangle, R.D., Jr., Hope, R.S., Rowan, E.L., and Lentz, E.E., 2012, Geologic cross section C–C’ through the Appalachian basin from Erie County, north-central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge province, Bedford County, south-central Pennsylvania: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3172, 2 sheets, 70-p.
  • Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in The

    Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in The

    Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Medina County, Ohio, through Southwestern and South-Central Pennsylvania to Hampshire County, West Virginia U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839-K Chapter K Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Medina County, Ohio, through Southwestern and South-Central Pennsylvania to Hampshire County, West Virginia By ROBERT T. RYDER, ANITA G. HARRIS, and JOHN E. REPETSKI Stratigraphic framework of the Cambrian and Ordovician sequence in part of the central Appalachian basin and the structure of underlying block-faulted basement rocks U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839 EVOLUTION OF SEDIMENTARY BASINS-APPALACHIAN BASIN U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, Jr., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1992 For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Ryder, Robert T. Stratigraphic framework of Cambrian and Ordovician rocks in the central Appalachian Basin from Medina County, Ohio, through southwestern and south-central Pennsylvania to Hampshire County, West Virginia / by Robert T. Ryder, Anita C. Harris, and John E. Repetski. p. cm. (Evolution of sedimentary basins Appalachian Basin ; ch. K) (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1839-K) Includes bibliographical references. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.3:1839-K 1. Geology, Stratigraphic Cambrian.
  • Figure 3A. Major Geologic Formations in West Virginia. Allegheney And

    Figure 3A. Major Geologic Formations in West Virginia. Allegheney And

    82° 81° 80° 79° 78° EXPLANATION West Virginia county boundaries A West Virginia Geology by map unit Quaternary Modern Reservoirs Qal Alluvium Permian or Pennsylvanian Period LTP d Dunkard Group LTP c Conemaugh Group LTP m Monongahela Group 0 25 50 MILES LTP a Allegheny Formation PENNSYLVANIA LTP pv Pottsville Group 0 25 50 KILOMETERS LTP k Kanawha Formation 40° LTP nr New River Formation LTP p Pocahontas Formation Mississippian Period Mmc Mauch Chunk Group Mbp Bluestone and Princeton Formations Ce Obrr Omc Mh Hinton Formation Obps Dmn Bluefield Formation Dbh Otbr Mbf MARYLAND LTP pv Osp Mg Greenbrier Group Smc Axis of Obs Mmp Maccrady and Pocono, undivided Burning Springs LTP a Mmc St Ce Mmcc Maccrady Formation anticline LTP d Om Dh Cwy Mp Pocono Group Qal Dhs Ch Devonian Period Mp Dohl LTP c Dmu Middle and Upper Devonian, undivided Obps Cw Dhs Hampshire Formation LTP m Dmn OHIO Ct Dch Chemung Group Omc Obs Dch Dbh Dbh Brailler and Harrell, undivided Stw Cwy LTP pv Ca Db Brallier Formation Obrr Cc 39° CPCc Dh Harrell Shale St Dmb Millboro Shale Mmc Dhs Dmt Mahantango Formation Do LTP d Ojo Dm Marcellus Formation Dmn Onondaga Group Om Lower Devonian, undivided LTP k Dhl Dohl Do Oriskany Sandstone Dmt Ot Dhl Helderberg Group LTP m VIRGINIA Qal Obr Silurian Period Dch Smc Om Stw Tonoloway, Wills Creek, and Williamsport Formations LTP c Dmb Sct Lower Silurian, undivided LTP a Smc McKenzie Formation and Clinton Group Dhl Stw Ojo Mbf Db St Tuscarora Sandstone Ordovician Period Ojo Juniata and Oswego Formations Dohl Mg Om Martinsburg Formation LTP nr Otbr Ordovician--Trenton and Black River, undivided 38° Mmcc Ot Trenton Group LTP k WEST VIRGINIA Obr Black River Group Omc Ordovician, middle calcareous units Mp Db Osp St.
  • Stratigraphy and Structure of the Subsurface Cambrian and Ordovician Carbonates of New York

    Stratigraphy and Structure of the Subsurface Cambrian and Ordovician Carbonates of New York

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 093 640 SE 017 316 AUTHOR Rickard, Lawrence V. TITLE Stratigraphy and Structure of the Subsurface Cambrian and Ordovician Carbonates of New York. INSTITUTION New York State Education Dept., Albany. PUB DATE 73 NOTE 30p. EDRS PRICE EF-$0.75 HC-$1.85 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS Bibliographies; Earth Science; *Geology; Instruction; *Instructional Materials; *Maps; *Paleontology; Science Education IDENTIFIERS New York State Museum and Science Service ABSTRACT This publication presents a description pf 137 wells in New York State and adjacent parts of Pennsylvania. Correlations with surface exposures are established. Maps and cross sections display the thickness, structure, and stratigraphic relationships of the carbonates described. ,A paleogeologic map of New York State at the end of the Early Ordovician is presented. Two distinct series of rocks which comprise the Cambrian and Ordovician carbonates of New York'are described and studied in detail. The monograpil includes an extensive bibliography, several schematic figures and diagrams, and two appendices which give data relevant to the identification of control wells and subsurface data from control wells. (Author/EB) U S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION B WELFARE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO OUCEO EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FRO': THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGIN ATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRE SENT OFFICIAL NATIONAL INSTITUTE DI EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY Stratigraphy and Structure of .the', Subsurface Cambrian OrdoVician arbonates of New York LAWRENCE V. RICKARD NEW YORK STATE MUSEUM AND SCIENCE SERVICE MAP AND CHART SERIES NUMBER 18 The Ulu:Trill) of the Slate of New .York The Stale Education Department Albany, 1973 THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Regents of the University (with years when terms expire) 1984 JOSEPH W.
  • A2 and B2: Upper Devonian Kellwasser Extinction Events in New York and Pennsylvania: Offshore to Onshore Transect Across the F

    A2 and B2: Upper Devonian Kellwasser Extinction Events in New York and Pennsylvania: Offshore to Onshore Transect Across the F

    A2 AND B2: UPPER DEVONIAN KELLWASSER EXTINCTION EVENTS IN NEW YORK AND PENNSYLVANIA: OFFSHORE TO ONSHORE TRANSECT ACROSS THE FRASNIAN-FAMENNIAN BOUNDARY ON THE EASTERN MARGIN OF THE APPALACHIAN BASIN ANDREW M. BUSH AND J. ANDREW BEARD Geosciences & Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 GORDON BAIRD Department of Geosciences, SUNY Fredonia, Fredonia, NY 14063 D. JEFFREY OVER Department of Geological Sciences, SUNY Geneseo, Geneseo, NY 14454 with contributions by KATHERINE TUSKES Department of Geological Sciences, Atmospheric, Ocean, and Earth Science, George Mason University, Manassas, VA 20110 SARAH K. BRISSON AND JALEIGH Q. PIER Geosciences & Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 INTRODUCTION Earth-system perturbations caused a series of mass extinction events during the Devonian Period, including the Taghanic event in the Givetian, the Lower and Upper Kellwasser events in the Frasnian, and the Hangenberg event in the Famennian (House, 2002; Bambach, 2006). These extinctions occurred against the backdrop of orbitally forced sea-level fluctuations, the Acadian Orogeny (Averbuch et al., 2005), the expansion of plants and animals on land (Algeo et al., 1995), and ecological changes in the marine biosphere (Signor and Brett, 1984; Bambach, 1999). The Frasnian-Famennian boundary in particular represents a significant global crisis, considered one of the “big five” mass extinctions (Raup and Sepkoski, 1982) that led to the demise of the widespread and diverse Devonian