4. Strukturen Der Aktion Sühnezeichen Friedensdienste

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

4. Strukturen Der Aktion Sühnezeichen Friedensdienste Zwischen Sühne und Frieden Eine NGO im Konflikt in Israel Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor philosophiae (Dr. phil.) vorgelegt der Philosophischen Fakultät der Technischen Universität Chemnitz von Herrn Marcus Nolden, geboren am 04.12.1976 in Köln Chemnitz, den 04.04.2016 Inhaltsverzeichnis Seite 2 Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Einführung in die Thematik .................................................................................... 4 2. Methodisches Vorgehen ....................................................................................... 35 2.1. Erhebungs- und Auswertungsinstrumente ........................................................ 43 2.1.1. Teilnehmende Beobachtung/ Feldforschung ............................................. 44 2.1.2. Dokumentenanalyse .................................................................................. 47 2.1.3. Teilnarrative Interviews.............................................................................. 49 2.2. Sampling .......................................................................................................... 51 2.2.1. Gesprächspartner_innen ........................................................................... 53 3. Historischer Kontext ............................................................................................. 58 3.1. Eine besondere Beziehung? ............................................................................ 58 3.1.1. Normalität .................................................................................................. 62 3.1.2. Normalität zwischen Staaten ..................................................................... 67 3.2. Deutsch-Israelische Beziehungen ab 1948 ...................................................... 70 3.2.1. Die Anfangsjahre der Beziehungen (1945 – 1953) .................................... 71 3.2.2. Der Weg zu diplomatischen Beziehungen (1953-1965) ............................. 76 3.2.3. Die komplizierten Jahre (1965 – 1974) ...................................................... 80 3.2.4. Das Scheitern der Normalisierung? (1974-1986) ....................................... 82 3.2.5. Der Historikerstreit und die Normalisierung (1986 – 1991) ........................ 85 3.2.6. Eine normale Beziehung? ......................................................................... 88 3.3. Aktion Sühnezeichen Friedensdienste bis 1968 ............................................... 90 3.3.1. Die Anfänge von Aktion Sühnezeichen (1954 – 1958) ............................... 91 3.3.2. Versöhnungszeichen oder Sühnezeichen?................................................ 93 3.3.3. Die ersten Jahre der Aktion Sühnezeichen (1958 – 1961) ......................... 95 3.3.4. Erste Projekte in Israel (1960 - 1968) ........................................................ 97 4. Strukturen der Aktion Sühnezeichen Friedensdienste .................................... 104 4.1. Leitlinien der Arbeit ........................................................................................ 104 4.2. Finanzierung .................................................................................................. 107 4.3. Länder ............................................................................................................ 108 5. Die Aktion zwischen Sühnezeichen & Friedensdienste ................................... 111 5.1. Friedensdienste vs. Sühnezeichen ................................................................. 111 5.1.1. Anderer Name, andere Ziele? ................................................................. 113 5.1.2. Ringen um die moralisch-historische Verantwortung ............................... 114 Inhaltsverzeichnis Seite 3 5.1.3. Langlebigkeit der Auseinandersetzung .................................................... 116 5.2. Die Organisation verändert ihr Gesicht ........................................................... 118 5.2.1. Die palästinensisch-israelische Minderheit .............................................. 121 5.2.2. Der Anschlag von Nablus 1978 ............................................................... 128 5.2.3. Golfkrieg 1991 ......................................................................................... 142 5.3. „Die“ oder „wir“? ............................................................................................. 166 6. Fazit: Universalismus oder Partikularismus? ................................................... 191 7. Literaturverzeichnis ............................................................................................ 201 8. Abbildungsverzeichnis ....................................................................................... 230 9. Anhang (Transkripte) .......................................................................................... 231 10. Lebenslauf ......................................................................................................... 232 11. Selbstständigkeitserklärung ............................................................................ 234 1. Einführung in die Thematik Seite 4 1. Einführung in die Thematik „Seit Auschwitz - welch traurige List - kann tatsächlich von einer „deutsch- jüdischen Symbiose“ gesprochen werden - freilich einer negativen: für beide, für Deutsche wie für Juden, ist das Ergebnis der Massenvernichtung zum Ausgangs- punkt ihres Selbstverständnisses gewor- den; eine Art gegensätzliche Gemein- samkeit – ob sie es wollen oder nicht.“ (Diner 1986:9) Ein warmer Abend in einem kleinen Lokal in Jerusalem: Deutsche Freiwillige verschiedener deutscher NGOs1, die in ganz unterschiedlichen Bereichen2 der israelischen Gesellschaft arbeiten und aktiv sind, sitzen zusammen. Sie spre- chen über ihre Tätigkeiten und Erfahrungen in Israel und thematisieren dabei auch ihr Unbehagen über Situationen, in denen sie in Stellvertreterkonflikte verwickelt werden, weil, wie sie erzählen, in Israel jede Handlung immer im Zu- sammenhang mit dem Konflikt zwischen jüdischen und palästinensischen Inte- ressen und der eigenen Positionierung in diesem Konfliktfeld gedeutet würde. Im weiteren Verlauf des Abends erzählen die Freiwilligen von einem Vorgang, der hitzig diskutiert wurde und beispielhaft eine solche unbehagliche Situation darstellte. Die Jerusalemer Stadtverwaltung suchte für ihren Chor einen Auffüh- rungsort in der Altstadt. Deshalb wendete sich die Verwaltung mit einer Anfrage an die deutsch-protestantische Erlöserkirche, die sich in der Altstadt von Jeru- salem befindet. Bis hierhin ein unspektakulärer Vorgang, dessen Dramatik sich auf den ersten Blick nicht erschließt. Aber was genau ist das Dramatische an dieser eigentlich unverfänglichen Raumanfrage? Zum einen muss das bekann- termaßen durch die Shoah3 belastete und besondere deutsch-jüdische Verhält- 1 Eine Nichtregierungsorganisation (englisch: NGO) ist eine nicht gewinnorientierte Organisati- on, welche lokal, national oder international tätig sein kann. Auf ein bestimmtes Ziel hin ausge- richtet, versuchen NGOs beispielsweise eine Vielzahl von Leistungen und humanitären Aufga- ben wahrzunehmen, Bürgeranliegen bei Regierungen vorzubringen und die politische Land- schaft zu beobachten und mitzugestalten. 2 Die Betätigungsfelder erstreckten sich von der Mitarbeit in pädagogischen Einrichtungen, Frauenhäusern über die Arbeit in Gedenkstätten bis hin zur Arbeit mit Holocaustüberlebenden. 3 Im Rahmen dieser Arbeit wird der Begriff der „Shoah“ gewählt als die hebräische Bezeichnung des Völkermordes an den europäischen Juden. Dabei ist dem Autor bewusst, dass die Be- zeichnung für den Völkermord an den Juden bis zum heutigen Tag Inhalt vielfacher kontrover- ser Diskussionen ist. Insbesondere der Begriff „Holocaust“ wird gegenwärtig nicht nur für den 1. Einführung in die Thematik Seite 5 nis, zum anderen müssen das historisch ebenfalls belastete christlich-jüdische, christlich-muslimische, deutsch-palästinensische sowie deutsch-israelische und das oftmals nah am Abgrund operierende palästinensisch-israelische innerge- sellschaftliche Verhältnis in die Betrachtung einbezogen und bedacht werden. Die Freiwilligen berichten an diesem Abend, dass die deutsche protestantische Gemeinde und ihre Vertreter_innen4 dem Wunsch der Stadt Jerusalem prinzipi- ell nachkommen und auf diesem Wege auch ihre Freundschaft zum jüdischen Israel bekräftigen wollten, doch zugleich könnte mit einer solchen, von einigen als freizügig empfundenen Aktion die Verbindungen zu den palästinensischen Partner_innen in Israel empfindlich gestört werden. Um also in dieser Situation möglichst beiden Seiten gerecht zu werden und keinen der Partner_innen zu verlieren, setzte sich eine diplomatische Maschinerie in Gang, die darum be- müht war, zwischen beiden Positionen zu verhandeln und keine Seite „vor den Kopf“ zu stoßen. Je nach dem, welcher Position der/ die jeweilige Erzähler_in zugeneigt war, also ob nun mehr einer pro-israelischen oder mehr pro- palästinensischen, veränderte sich die Darstellung der Erzählung um einen be- deutenden Faktor. Entweder wurde thematisiert, dass die palästinensisch- christlich-israelischen Partner_innen bemüht gewesen seien, massiven Druck durch die Herstellung gemeinsamer christlicher Bezüge gegen die Veranstal- tungszusage auszuüben oder aber dass die jüdisch-israelischen Partner_innen ihrerseits Druck über die historisch belastete Vergangenheit und die daraus ab- Völkermord an den europäischen Juden verwendet, sondern ist einer allmählichen Bedeu- tungserweiterung unterzogen worden, so dass auch die Verbrechen
Recommended publications
  • HBO and the HOLOCAUST: CONSPIRACY, the HISTORICAL FILM, and PUBLIC HISTORY at WANNSEE Nicholas K. Johnson Submitted to the Facul
    HBO AND THE HOLOCAUST: CONSPIRACY, THE HISTORICAL FILM, AND PUBLIC HISTORY AT WANNSEE Nicholas K. Johnson Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in the Department of History, Indiana University December 2016 Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. Master’s Thesis Committee __________________________________ Raymond J. Haberski, Ph.D., Chair __________________________________ Thorsten Carstensen, Ph.D. __________________________________ Kevin Cramer, Ph.D. ii Acknowledgements First, I would like to thank the members of my committee for supporting this project and offering indispensable feedback and criticism. I would especially like to thank my chair, Ray Haberski, for being one of the most encouraging advisers I have ever had the pleasure of working with and for sharing his passion for film and history with me. Thorsten Carstensen provided his fantastic editorial skills and for all the times we met for lunch during my last year at IUPUI. I would like to thank Kevin Cramer for awakening my interest in German history and for all of his support throughout my academic career. Furthermore, I would like to thank Jason M. Kelly, Claudia Grossmann, Anita Morgan, Rebecca K. Shrum, Stephanie Rowe, Modupe Labode, Nancy Robertson, and Philip V. Scarpino for all the ways in which they helped me during my graduate career at IUPUI. I also thank the IUPUI Public History Program for admitting a Germanist into the Program and seeing what would happen. I think the experiment paid off.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1: Sample Docum Ents
    APPENDIX 1: SAMPLE DOCUMENTS Figure 1.1. Arrest warrant (Haftbefehl) for Georg von Sauberzweig, signed by Morgen. Courtesy of Bundesarchiv Berlin-Lichterfelde 129 130 Appendix 1 Figure 1.2. Judgment against Sauberzweig. Courtesy of Bundesarchiv Berlin-Lichterfelde Appendix 1 131 Figure 1.3. Hitler’s rejection of Sauberzweig’s appeal. Courtesy of Bundesarchiv Berlin-Lichterfelde 132 Appendix 1 Figure 1.4. Confi rmation of Sauberzweig’s execution. Courtesy of Bundesarchiv Berlin- Lichterfelde Appendix 1 133 Figure 1.5. Letter from Morgen to Maria Wachter. Estate of Konrad Morgen, courtesy of the Fritz Bauer Institut APPENDIX 2: PHOTOS Figure 2.1. Konrad Morgen 1938. Estate of Konrad Morgen, courtesy of the Fritz Bauer Institut 134 Appendix 2 135 Figure 2.2. Konrad Morgen in his SS uniform. Estate of Konrad Morgen, courtesy of the Fritz Bauer Institut 136 Appendix 2 Figure 2.3. Karl Otto Koch. Courtesy of the US National Archives Appendix 2 137 Figure 2.4. Karl and Ilse Koch with their son, at Buchwald. Corbis Images Figure 2.5. Odilo Globocnik 138 Appendix 2 Figure 2.6. Hermann Fegelein. Courtesy of Yad Vashem Figure 2.7. Ilse Koch. Courtesy of Yad Vashem Appendix 2 139 Figure 2.8. Waldemar Hoven. Courtesy of Yad Vashem Figure 2.9. Christian Wirth. Courtesy of Yad Vashem 140 Appendix 2 Figure 2.10. Jaroslawa Mirowska. Private collection NOTES Preface 1. The execution of Karl Otto Koch, former commandant of Buchenwald, is well documented. The execution of Hermann Florstedt, former commandant of Majdanek, is disputed by a member of his family (Lindner (1997)).
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Hannah Arendt's Representation of The
    Understanding, Reconciliation, and Prevention – Rethinking Hannah Arendt’s Representation of the Holocaust by Lindsay Shirley Macumber A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department for the Study of Religion University of Toronto © Copyright by Lindsay Shirley Macumber 2016 Understanding, Reconciliation, and Prevention: Rethinking Hannah Arendt’s Representation of the Holocaust Lindsay Shirley Macumber Doctor of Philosophy Centre for the Study of Religion University of Toronto 2016 Abstract In an effort to identify and assess the practical effects and ethical implications of representations of the Holocaust, this dissertation is a rethinking and evaluation of Hannah Arendt’s representation of the Holocaust according to the goal that she herself set out to achieve in thinking and writing about the Holocaust, understanding, or, “the unmediated, attentive facing up to, and resisting of, reality- whatever it may be.”1 By examining Arendt’s confrontation with the Holocaust from within the context of systemic evil (which is how I argue she approached the Holocaust), and in light of her ultimate aim to “be at home in the world,” I conclude that understanding entails both reconciling human beings to the world after the unprecedented evil of the Holocaust, as well as working towards its prevention in the future. Following my introductory chapter, where I argue that Arendt provided an overall representation of the Holocaust, and delimit the criteria of reconciliation and prevention, each subsequent chapter is dedicated to an aspect I identify as central to her representation of the Holocaust: Her claim that totalitarianism was unprecedented; that the evil exemplified by Adolf Eichmann was “banal;” and that the Jewish Councils “cooperated” with the Nazis in the destruction of their communities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Strange and Curious History of the Law Used to Prosecute Adolf Eichmann
    Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review Volume 34 Number 3 Spring 2012 Article 7 Spring 2012 The Strange and Curious History of the Law Used to Prosecute Adolf Eichmann Michael J. Bazyler Chapman University School of Law Julia Y. Scheppach UOP McGeorge School of Law, 2009 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Michael J. Bazyler and Julia Y. Scheppach, The Strange and Curious History of the Law Used to Prosecute Adolf Eichmann, 34 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 417 (2012). Available at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr/vol34/iss3/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Strange and Curious History of the Law Used to Prosecute Adolf Eichmann MICHAEL J. BAZYLER* AND JULIA Y. SCHEPPACH** I. INTRODUCTION The modern State of Israel was born of two powerful impulses. First was the dream of the Zionist pioneers, starting in the late nineteenth century, to return to the ancient Jewish homeland, cultivate the land, and create a new kind of Jew—strong and proud—in an independent state of their own.1 Second was the growing need for a place of refuge in the land of Zion for persecuted
    [Show full text]
  • Theodore Silva “Six Million Accusers” Essay the Trial Address of Israeli
    Theodore Silva “Six Million Accusers” essay The trial address of Israeli attorney-general Gideon Hausner against Nazi Bureaucrat Adolf Eichmann is a thorough description of the horrors of the Holocaust and a powerful condemnation of Eichmann’s role in it. Its language is bone-chilling, especially to those of us with Jewish ancestry and stories of family members permanently displaced in that terrible Shoah. The results of Adolf Eichmann’s trial, and the Nuremburg trials before his, should always be regarded as repudiations of deranged Nazi ideology and the systematic dehumanization and terror that it breeds. But this essay is not about the ancient evil of anti-Semitism before and after Dreyfus and Hitler, nor is it about the trial of history’s most murderous bureaucrat Adolf Eichmann. In this essay I will describe how “ordinary” people are capable of such inhumanity, explain the controversy around “the banality of evil” and present examples of the “just following orders” plea being used to justify inhumane acts in the present day. In October 1945, the International Military Tribunal (IMT) convened in Nuremberg, Germany to try 199 Nazis and their collaborators in the wake of history’s deadliest war. According to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, “The defendants generally acknowledged that the crimes occurred but denied that they were responsible, as they were following orders from a higher authority.” This “Befehl ist Befehl” defense—literally “an order is an order,” was so widely used in these trials that it became known as the “Nuremberg defense.” This was fifteen years before the trial of Adolf Eichmann, where he used the same plea to the Jerusalem District Court in 1961.
    [Show full text]
  • The Representation of Women in European Holocaust Films: Perpetrators, Victims and Resisters
    The Representation of Women in European Holocaust Films: Perpetrators, Victims and Resisters Ingrid Lewis B.A.(Hons), M.A.(Hons) This thesis is submitted to Dublin City University for the award of PhD June 2015 School of Communications Supervisor: Dr. Debbie Ging I hereby declare that this material, which I now submit for assessment on the programme of study leading to the award of PhD is entirely my own work, and that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge breach any law of copywright, and has not been taken from the work of others save and to the extent that such work has been cited and acknowledged within the text of my work. Signed: ID No: 12210142 Date: ii Acknowledgements This thesis is dedicated to my most beloved parents, Iosefina and Dumitru, and to my sister Cristina I am extremely indebted to my supervisor, Dr. Debbie Ging, for her insightful suggestions and exemplary guidance. Her positive attitude and continuous encouragement throughout this thesis were invaluable. She’s definitely the best supervisor one could ever ask for. I would like to thank the staff from the School of Communications, Dublin City University and especially to the Head of Department, Dr. Pat Brereton. Also special thanks to Dr. Roddy Flynn who was very generous with his time and help in some of the key moments of my PhD. I would like to acknowledge the financial support granted by Laois County Council that made the completion of this PhD possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Before Adolf Eichmann: a Kafkian Analysis of the ‘Banality of Evil’1
    53 (2/2019), pp. 91–107 The Polish Journal DOI: 10.19205/53.19.5 of Aesthetics Matthew Wester* Before Adolf Eichmann: A Kafkian Analysis of the ‘Banality Of Evil’1 Abstract Arendt’s account of Adolf Eichmann as acting only out of banal intentions remains contro- versial. I supplement our understanding of the “banality of evil” by demonstrating that Arendt also meant it to describe a factual social arrangement characterized by a form of false consciousness. I apply an original interpretation of Kafka’s The Trial to Eichmann in Jerusalem, and I show that Eichmann’s trial was “before” him in the same way as the Kafkian man from the country is “before” the Law. Keywords Arendt, Kafka, Banality of Evil, Eichmann, Crimes against Humanity Introduction Ever since Hannah Arendt published Eichmann in Jerusalem (henceforth, EJ) in the early 1960s, almost every aspect of her analysis and critique of Adolf Eichmann’s trial has been scrutinized, which has been mostly directed at the accuracy of Arendt’s description of Adolf Eichmann as embodying “the ba- nality of evil.” Arendt’s account of Eichmann as a facilitator of state-spon- sored genocide acting only out of commonplace (viz. banal) intentions still * South Texas College Department of Philosophy Email: [email protected] 1 I am grateful to Professor Annabel Herzog for her initial encouragement and comments when I presented an early version of this paper at the 2015 meeting of the Arendt Circle, Professor Daniel Conway for his comments on early drafts of this paper, and to Daniel Cole for suggestions on several iterations of this manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction Norman J.W. Goda Historiographical discussion on the Holocaust in the past twenty years has focused on several factors concerning Jewish responses to the Nazis’ policy of mass murder. One concerns the recovery of Jewish voices themselves through contemporary documents, diaries, and postwar testimonies, and their integra- tion into broader Holocaust narratives. Another more complicated problem is to discern what Jewish narratives ultimately mean for the history of the Holo- caust and for the longer continuum of Jewish history itself. The fi fteen essays in this volume include recent work by leading scholars in the fi eld, mostly from North America and Israel. They provide signposts concerning these problems ranging from ways of thinking about regional history to Jewish political iden- tity in extremis. The context of this discussion is extensive, stretching back to the war itself and including a number of historiographical trends, some intertwined, some strangely separated by internal sequestrations within the historical profession. They cannot all be explained here, even in part, and indeed, whole volumes in recent years have been dedicated to the broader historiography of the Holo- caust and related questions of sources and approaches, to say nothing of argu- ments on individual questions.1 But a sketch may be useful in providing some background to the essays that follow. A small example may draw a larger picture. The Trial of the Major War Criminals at Nuremberg in 1945–46 was the fi rst international inquiry into the crimes of the Nazi state. As the Soviets prepared their part of the case, concerning Crimes against Humanity, they included on their witness list the noted Yiddish-language poet Avrom Sutzkever, who survived the formation and ultimate destruction of the ghetto in Vilna, long a center of Jewish culture.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Espionage: Nazi Diplomats and Spies in Argentina, 1933-1945
    The Politics of Espionage: Nazi Diplomats and Spies in Argentina, 1933-1945 A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Richard L. McGaha November 2009 © 2009 Richard L. McGaha. All Rights Reserved. 2 This dissertation titled The Politics of Espionage: Nazi Diplomats and Spies in Argentina, 1933-1945 by RICHARD L. MCGAHA has been approved for the History Department and the College of Arts and Sciences by Norman J.W. Goda Professor of History Benjamin M. Ogles Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 ABSTRACT MCGAHA, RICHARD L., Ph.D, November 2009, History The Politics of Espionage: Nazi Diplomats and Spies in Argentina, 1933-1945 (415 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Norman J.W. Goda This dissertation investigates Nazi Germany’s diplomacy and intelligence- gathering in Argentina from 1933-1945. It does so from three perspectives. This study first explores the rivalries that characterized the bureaucracy in the Third Reich. It argues that those rivalries negatively affected Germany’s diplomatic position in Argentina. The actions of the AO in Argentina in the 1930s were indicative of this trend. This created a fear of fifth-column activity among Latin American governments with large German populations. Second, this study explores the rivalry between the Sicherheitsdienst (Security Service, SD) of the Reichssicherheitshauptamt (Reich Security Main Office, RSHA) and Auswärtiges Amt (Foreign Ministry, AA). It argues that the rivalry between these two organizations in Argentina was part of a larger plan on the part of Amt VI, SS Foreign Intelligence to usurp the functions of the AA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eichmann Case and the Distortion of History
    Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review Volume 34 Number 3 Spring 2012 Article 5 Spring 2012 The Eichmann Case and the Distortion of History Eli M. Rosenbaum United States Department of Justice Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Eli M. Rosenbaum, The Eichmann Case and the Distortion of History, 34 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 387 (2012). Available at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr/vol34/iss3/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Eichmann Case and the Distortion of History ELI M. ROSENBAUM* Good afternoon. It is a privilege to be here to participate in a program with so many distinguished speakers who have enlightened us so much with remarkable presentations today. It is a special honor to be in a room once again with one of my heroes, Justice Bach. Those of you who heard Justice Bach either last night or this afternoon will soon learn that he is not only my hero, but that he has been my teacher as well; you’ll notice that especially near the end of my remarks. I should preface those remarks by stating that the views I will express are strictly my own.
    [Show full text]
  • The Experience of Rhetoric and Public Memory
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Department of Communication Arts and Sciences JUST REMEMBERING: THE EXPERIENCE OF RHETORIC AND PUBLIC MEMORY A Dissertation in Communication Arts and Sciences by Michael Warren Tumolo 2008 Michael Warren Tumolo Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2008 The dissertation of Michael Warren Tumolo was reviewed and approved* by the following: Stephen H. Browne Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Thomas W. Benson Professor of Speech Communication Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Rhetoric Rosa A. Eberly Associate Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences Associate Professor of English J. Michael Hogan Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences Christopher P. Long Associate Professor of Philosophy James P. Dillard Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences Head of the Department of Communication Arts and Sciences *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT In Just Remembering: The Experience of Rhetoric and Public Memory, I analyze how the rhetoric of public memory texts is experienced, how such experience informs the character and practices of ethics, politics, and justice in the United States, and how we might re-experience public memory in a way that does it justice. The chapters focus on the memorial function of Plato‘s Republic, Hannah Arendt‘s Eichmann in Jerusalem, and The President’s Commission on the Holocaust: Report to the President. My primary concern in this dissertation is to analyze how fundamental predispositions limiting human judgment, knowledge, and agency are forged through the experience of the rhetoric of public memorial texts.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case of Successful Transitional Justice: Fritz Bauer and His Late Recognition in the Federal Republic of Germany
    Polish Political Science Yearbook vol. 46 (2) (2017), pp. 71–84 DOI: 10.15804/ppsy2017205 PL ISSN 0208-7375 Jakub Gortat University of Łódź (Poland) A Case of Successful Transitional Justice: Fritz Bauer and his Late Recognition in the Federal Republic of Germany Abstract: Germany is an example of a country which has been implementing transitional justice for decades and is still active in this field. What is more, con- temporary Germans have recently come to terms with their not–so-distant past and their negligence in this area by showing the falsehood, backwardness, and in- justice as negative foundations of the young Federal Republic. This article evokes the person of Fritz Bauer, the prosecutor in the state of Hessen. His struggle for human dignity and the memory of his achievements after his death exemplify an accomplished case of transitional justice and the memory of it. During his lifetime he contributed to bringing to trial numerous Nazi criminals, even at the cost of habitual threats and disregard. Forgotten for a few decades, Bauer and his legacy have been recently rediscovered and studied. Eventually Bauer became a movie character and was finally brought back to the collective memory of Germans. The belated, but well-deserved wave of popularity of Fritz Bauer in the German culture memory proves that reflections on the transitional justice are still topical and important. Keywords: German transitional justice; collective memory; cultural memory; Nazi crimes; Fritz Bauer; the Auschwitz trial in Frankfurt; coming to terms with the past The Federal Republic of Germany can be named as an example of a country that did succeed in most aspects of conducting transitional justice and coming to terms with its Nazi past in a broader context.
    [Show full text]