Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy Volume 28 | Issue 1 Article 1 5-1-2014 A Right to Voluntary Euthanasia? Confusion in Canada in Carter John Keown Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndjlepp Recommended Citation John Keown, A Right to Voluntary Euthanasia? Confusion in Canada in Carter, 28 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 1 (2014). Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndjlepp/vol28/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy at NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. 34929-nde_28-1 Sheet No. 6 Side A 05/07/2014 15:37:06 \\jciprod01\productn\N\NDE\28-1\NDE101.txt unknown Seq: 1 7-MAY-14 15:32 ARTICLES A RIGHT TO VOLUNTARY EUTHANASIA? CONFUSION IN CANADA IN CARTER JOHN KEOWN* In Carter v. Canada (Attorney General), Justice Lynn Smith held that the Canadian Criminal Code’s prohibitions on murder and assisting suicide infringe Sections 7 and 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms to the extent that those prohibitions outlaw voluntary, active euthanasia and physi- cian-assisted suicide. This Article suggests the judgment is defective in at least four key respects: misunderstanding the principle of the inviolability of human life; concluding that laws against assisting suicide discriminate against those physically incapable of committing suicide; evading the logical “slippery slope” argument; and (as the Irish High Court has since concluded in Fleming v.