DOCSLIB.ORG

Warlike and Peaceful Societies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Warlike and Peaceful Societies The Interaction of Genes and Culture AGNER FOG To access digital resources including: blog posts videos online appendices and to purchase copies of this book in: hardback paperback ebook editions Go to: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/657 Open Book Publishers is a non-profit independent initiative. We rely on sales and donations to continue publishing high-quality academic works. Warlike and Peaceful Societies The Interaction of Genes and Culture Agner Fog https://www.openbookpublishers.com © 2017 Agner Fog This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work; to adapt the work and to make commercial use of the work providing attribution is made to the authors (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Agner Fog, Warlike and Peaceful Societies: The Interaction of Genes and Culture. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2017, http://dx.doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0128 In order to access detailed and updated information on the license, please visit https:// www.openbookpublishers.com/product/657#copyright Further details about CC BY licenses are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/ All external links were active at the time of publication unless otherwise stated and have been archived via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine at https://archive.org/web Digital material and resources associated with this volume are available at https://www. openbookpublishers.com/product/657#resources Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omission or error will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher. ISBN Paperback: 978-1-78374-403-9 ISBN Hardback: 978-1-78374-404-6 ISBN Digital (PDF): 978-1-78374-405-3 ISBN Digital ebook (epub): 978-1-78374-406-0 ISBN Digital ebook (mobi): 978-1-78374-407-7 DOI: 10.11647/OBP.0128 Cover image: War memorial, Whitehall, London. Photo by Aimee Rivers (2011). Flickr, https://www.flickr.com/photos/sermoa/5361099123, CC BY-SA 2.0 Cover design: Anna Gatti All paper used by Open Book Publishers is SFI (Sustainable Forestry Initiative), PEFC (Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification Schemes) and Forest Stewardship Council(r)(FSC(r) certified. Printed in the United Kingdom, United States, and Australia by Lightning Source for Open Book Publishers (Cambridge, UK) Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1. A different kind of social science 2 1.2. Overview of the book 5 2. The Theory of Regal and Kungic Cultures 7 2.1. In a nutshell: ‘regal’ and ‘kungic’ explained 7 2.2. Evolutionary basis for regality theory 9 2.3. An evolutionarily stable strategy 13 2.4. The behavior of the leader 15 2.5. Why are most warriors and chiefs men? 17 2.6. Cultural effects of regal and kungic tendencies 21 3. Contributions from Other Theories 27 3.1. Influence of the environment: Contributions from 27 ecological theory 3.2. Nature or nurture: Evolution of sociality 32 3.3. Fertility: Contributions from life history theory 34 3.4. Contributions from political demography 35 3.5. World view and personality: Authoritarianism 39 theory 3.6. Contributions from other social psychological 42 theories 3.7. Contributions from social values theories 45 3.8. The theory of tight and loose cultures and other 48 culture theories 3.9. Contributions from human empowerment theory 56 3.10. Moral panics: Contributions from the sociology of 59 deviance 4. Different Kinds of War in Human History 65 4.1. The rise of empires: Contributions from cultural 65 selection theory 4.2. The fall of empires: Contributions from historical 69 dynamics theory 4.3. General theories of war and peace 72 4.4. Changing patterns of war 76 4.5. Theories of revolution 88 5. Economic Determinants of Conflict and Fear 93 5.1. Fear is profitable: The economy of the mass media 93 5.2. Economic booms and busts 100 5.3. Greed or grievance: Economic theories of civil war 107 5.4. The resource curse 111 5.5. Example: Proxy war in Afghanistan 116 6. Strategic Uses of Fear 125 6.1. Terrorism conflicts 125 6.2. The strategy of tension in Italy and elsewhere 135 6.3. Fabrication of threats and conflicts 144 6.4. Example: Why World War II started 157 7. Regality Theory Applied to Ancient Cultures 163 7.1. Andamanese 166 7.2. Arrernte 170 7.3. Babylonians 173 7.4. Chiricahua Apache 176 7.5. Copper Inuit (Eskimo) 179 7.6. E De (Rhadé) 181 7.7. Ganda 183 7.8. Gilyak 188 7.9. Hausa 191 7.10. Inca 195 7.11. !Kung 198 7.12. Maasai 203 7.13. Mbuti 207 7.14. Somali 211 7.15. Warao 213 7.16. Yahgan 216 7.17. Yanomamo 218 7.18. Yi (Lolo, Nuosu) 222 8. Statistical Testing of Regality Theory 227 8.1. Problems of cross-cultural statistics 227 8.2. Ancient cultures, large sample 230 8.3. Subsample, 18 cultures 244 8.4. Contemporary cultures, large sample 252 8.5. Evidence from existing studies 267 8.6. Conclusion of the statistical tests 269 9. Discussion and Conclusion 271 9.1. Summary of findings 271 9.2. Three epochs in human history 273 9.3. The regal/kungic dynamics and human social 277 development 9.4. New explanations of well-known phenomena 279 9.5. Integration with other theories 281 9.6. Policy lessons 283 9.7. Supporting evidence 288 9.8. What regality theory can be used for 290 9.9. Further discussion 291 10. Bibliography 293 11. Illustrations 345 Index 349 1. Introduction All through recorded history we have seen extreme differences between different human societies. Some societies in some periods have been warlike and cruel beyond comprehension, while other societies in other times and places have been remarkably peaceful and tolerant. Societies that are warlike, hierarchical, and intolerant with strict discipline are called regal. Societies that are peaceful, egalitarian, and tolerant are called kungic. Many societies are something in between these two extremes. The present book offers a new, groundbreaking theory that explains this extreme variability in social organization and culture based on evolutionary theory. It has often been discussed whether such dramatic differences in human behavior are due to genetic differences or cultural norms. One aspect that is often missing in the genes-versus-culture debate is that genes may code for flexibility. Our genes enable us to behave differently under different conditions. This is called phenotypic plasticity.1 The theory presented here demonstrates that humans have a plasticity that enables us to adapt to different conditions of war or peace. Warlike or regal behavior has been adaptive under conditions of collective danger that were sometimes present in our evolutionary past, while conditions of collective security that were present at other times and places made peaceful or kungic behavior optimal from an evolutionary point of view. In other words, the potentials for both warlike and peaceful behavior are present in our genetic makeup. 1 Bateson and Gluckman (2011, p. 31) © 2017 Agner Fog, CC BY 4.0 https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0128.01 2 Warlike and Peaceful Societies Nobody is born a devil or a saint. Depending on our living conditions, we may become authoritarian and belligerent or peace-loving and tolerant. The theory presented here explains a likely evolutionary mechanism behind this flexible psychology and analyzes the conditions that make us either strident or docile. This theory, which will be called regality theory, can answer many burning questions about both individual and collective behavior: Why have so many tyrants fought cruel and unnecessary wars? Why do many people support their tyrants? Why do some people hate foreigners while other people readily embrace them? Why have people used their apparently peaceful religion to justify some of the worst atrocities in history? And why have other people dedicated their lives to the most unselfish charitable causes based on the very same religions? Why do some militants commit acts of terrorism against innocent people? And why can a few acts of terrorism that cause a limited amount of harm lead to dramatic changes in the political climate, while other events that cause much more harm have no noticeable political effect? The remarkable differences between warlike and peaceful societies are reflected in many characteristics of culture, including aspects that have no obvious relationship with war and peace, such as art preferences and sexual morals. This book explores such side effects as well and presents statistical evidence in support of the theory. 1.1. A different kind of social science ‘Scientific genius is extinct’, wrote Dean Simonton in Nature a few years ago. In his view, the only kind of scientific progress we see today is marginal improvements within old paradigms that have already been thoroughly explored. Revolutionary new ideas either do not occur or fail to be acknowledged.2 Scientists who are trained in one particular paradigm are unlikely to understand and accept a new, radically different paradigm.3 While everybody hails interdisciplinary research, the reality today is that many scientists guard their own scientific 2 Simonton (2013) 3 Kuhn (1962, chapter 12) 1. Introduction 3 territory. Scientists today have little freedom to choose their own subjects of research. The highly competitive funding system is more likely to support old research areas than radically new ones because it is controlled by established scientists through the peer review system.4 Most scientists start by specializing in one particular scientific paradigm and then search for problems that this paradigm can be applied to.
Recommended publications
  • Globalization. Security Crises

    Globalization. Security Crises

    “HENRI COANDA” GERMANY “GENERAL M.R. STEFANIK” AIR FORCE ACADEMY ARMED FORCES ACADEMY ROMANIA SLOVAK REPUBLIC INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE of SCIENTIFIC PAPER AFASES 2011 Brasov, 26-28 May 2011 GLOBALIZATION. SECURITY CRISES Iustin ACHIRECESEI, Vasile NODIŞ Introduction further reported that, such a base would not have been conceivable before Poland joined This report examines the implications Nato in 1999. of this strategy in recent years; following the In November of 2007 it was reported emergence of a New Cold War, as well as that, Russia threatened to site short-range analyzing the war in Georgia, the attempts and nuclear missiles in a second location on the methods of regime change in Iran, , the European Union's border yesterday if the expansion of he Afghan-Pakistan war theatre, United States refuses to abandon plans to erect and spread of conflict in Central Africa. These a missile defence shield. A senior Russian processes of a New Cold War and major army general said that Iskander missiles could regional wars and conflicts take the world be deployed in Belarus if US proposals to closer to a New World War. place 10 interceptor missiles and a radar in Peace is only be possible if the tools Poland and the Czech Republic go ahead. and engines of empires are dismantled. Putin also threatened to retrain Russia's nuclear arsenal on targets within Europe. Eastern Europe: Forefront of the New Cold However, Washington claims War that the shield is aimed not at Russia but at In 2002, the Guardian reported that, states such as Iran which it accuses of seeking “The US military build-up in the former to develop nuclear weapons that could one day Soviet republics of central Asia is strike the West.
  • Anglo-Iranian Dispute in 1951)

    Anglo-Iranian Dispute in 1951)

    Studia Litteraria Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 2019, special issue, pp. 231–243 Volume in Honour of Professor Anna Krasnowolska doi:10.4467/20843933ST.19.037.10980 www.ejournals.eu/Studia-Litteraria JOLANTA SIERAKOWSKA-DYNDO University of Warsaw e-mail: [email protected] Polish Judge Defended the Iranian Stance (Anglo-Iranian Dispute in 1951) Abstract The nationalization of oil fields in Iran on 20 March 1951 turned into a conflict between the British and Iranian governments. It was a heavy blow for the oil company from Great Britain, which since the beginning of the 20th century was present in Iran (since 1933 under the name of Anglo-Persian Oil Company, the name was changed for Anglo-Iranian Oil Company). British government lodged a complaint against Iran with the International Court of Justice, and then on 22 June 1951 filed a further request for the interim measures of protection to be implemented until the dispute is resolved. Two of the judges of the International Court of Justice gave a dissenting opinion in this case, one of them was a Polish judge, Bohdan Winiarski. In his opinion, and also opinion of Egyptian judge Abdel Hamid Badawi Pasha, the British government was not a party to the contract because it was signed between the Ira- nian Government and the Anglo-Persian Oil Company not with the British Government. This opinion was accepted by the International Court of Justice in Hague. The positive verdict of the Court was a huge victory for Iran. Without doubt, the Polish judge, Bohdan Winiarski, contributed to it.
  • Iran Hostage Crisis National Security Council, 1979 !

    Iran Hostage Crisis National Security Council, 1979 !

    CRISIS COMMITTEES | 2014e IRAN HOSTAGE CRISIS NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL, 1979 ! Dear Delegates, We are in the midst of the Iran Hostage Crisis, and there is no time to spare. Our situation is grave and desperate, and together we will find a solution into dealing with the recent events regarding the kidnapping of 52 Americans from the United States embassy in Tehran on November 4, 1979. Indeed there are many sides to this issue, and debates will be tense. The dichotomy between the many people being represented in this committee will surely lead to many disputes and tough agreements. Can the situation remain diplomatic? Or will it lead to something else? It shall remain up to you. It is with great pleasure, as director of this committee, to welcome you to our 2014 UTMUN conference. My name is Stanley Treivus, and alongside our Crisis manager Meerah Haq, we look forward to this thrilling weekend of debate that awaits us. We are both first year students studying Political Science and International relations and this will be our first time being involved in UTMUN. This conference will appeal to all delegates, experienced or novice. And our hope is that you will leave this committee with not only profound knowledge on the subject, but with a better sense of communication and improved debating skills than you had before. The issues we will be discussing will surround the many topics that relate directly to the Iran Hostage Crisis. We will look at foreign relations between the United States and Iran shortly before and during the crisis.
  • Music: the Case of Afghanistan by JOHN BAILY

    Music: the Case of Afghanistan by JOHN BAILY

    from Popular Music 1, CambridgeUniversity Press 1981 Cross -cultural perspectives in popular music: the case of Afghanistan by JOHN BAILY The problem of definition It is inevitable that the first issue of this yearbook will raise questions about the use of the term 'popular music'. I do not believe that this question is going to be easy to answer and, as a precaution, I think we should regard quick and seemingly clearcut solutions with suspicion. In fact, we may eventually have to operate with intuitive, poorly defined and rather elastic definitions of popular music. Before we resort to that expedient, however, the problem of definition must be considered and discussed from various points of view. The editors have offered the following two definitions (the number- ing is mine): (1)From one point of view 'popular music' exists in any stratified society. It is seen as the music of the mass of the people ... as against that of an élite. (2) From another point of view there is at the very least a significant qualita- tive change, both in the meaning which is felt to attach to the term and in the processes to which the music owes its life, when a society undergoes indus- trialisation. From this point of view popular music is typical of societies with a relatively highly developed division of labour and a clear distinction between producers and consumers, in which cultural products are created largely by professionals, sold in a mass market and reproduced through mass media. (P. i above) The first of these definitions is very general, the second very specific.
  • Leadership, Followership, and Evolution Some Lessons from the Past

    Leadership, Followership, and Evolution Some Lessons from the Past

    Leadership, Followership, and Evolution Some Lessons From the Past Mark Van Vugt University of Kent Robert Hogan Hogan Assessment Systems Robert B. Kaiser Kaplan DeVries Inc. This article analyzes the topic of leadership from an evo- Second, the literature focuses on leaders and tends to lutionary perspective and proposes three conclusions that ignore the essential role of followers (Hollander, 1992; are not part of mainstream theory. First, leading and Yukl, 2006). Third, research largely concentrates on prox- following are strategies that evolved for solving social imate issues of leadership (e.g., What makes one person a coordination problems in ancestral environments, includ- better leader than others?) and rarely considers its ultimate ing in particular the problems of group movement, intra- functions (e.g., How did leadership promote survival and group peacekeeping, and intergroup competition. Second, reproductive success among our ancestors?) (R. Hogan & the relationship between leaders and followers is inher- Kaiser, 2005). Finally, there has been little cross-fertiliza- ently ambivalent because of the potential for exploitation of tion between psychology and disciplines such as anthro- followers by leaders. Third, modern organizational struc- pology, economics, neuroscience, biology, and zoology, tures are sometimes inconsistent with aspects of our which also contain important insights about leadership evolved leadership psychology, which might explain the (Bennis, 2007; Van Vugt, 2006). alienation and frustration of many citizens and employees. This article offers a view of leadership inspired by The authors draw several implications of this evolutionary evolutionary theory, which modern scholars increasingly analysis for leadership theory, research, and practice. see as essential for understanding social life (Buss, 2005; Lawrence & Nohria, 2002; McAdams & Pals, 2006; Nettle, Keywords: evolution, leadership, followership, game the- 2006; Schaller, Simpson, & Kenrick, 2006).
  • Beowulf and Competitive Altruism,” P

    Beowulf and Competitive Altruism,” P

    January 2013 Volume 9, Issue 1 ASEBL Journal Association for the Study of Editor (Ethical Behavior)•(Evolutionary Biology) in Literature St. Francis College, Brooklyn Heights, N.Y. Gregory F. Tague, Ph.D. ~ Editorial Board ~▪▪~ Kristy Biolsi, Ph.D. THIS ISSUE FEATURES Kevin Brown, Ph.D. Wendy Galgan, Ph.D. † Eric Luttrell, “Modest Heroism: Beowulf and Competitive Altruism,” p. 2 Cheryl L. Jaworski, M.A. † Dena R. Marks, “Secretary of Disorientation: Writing the Circularity of Belief in Elizabeth Costello,” p.11 Anja Müller-Wood, Ph.D. Kathleen A. Nolan, Ph.D. † Margaret Bertucci Hamper, “’The poor little working girl’: The New Woman, Chloral, and Motherhood in The House of Mirth,” p. 19 Riza Öztürk, Ph.D. † Kristin Mathis, “Moral Courage in The Runaway Jury,” p. 22 Eric Platt, Ph.D. † William Bamberger, “A Labyrinthine Modesty: On Raymond Roussel Michelle Scalise Sugiyama, and Chiasmus,” p. 24 Ph.D. ~▪~ Editorial Interns † St. Francis College Moral Sense Colloquium: - Program Notes, p. 27 Tyler Perkins - Kristy L. Biolsi, “What Does it Mean to be a Moral Animal?”, p. 29 - Sophie Berman, “Science sans conscience n’est que ruine de l’âme,” p.36 ~▪~ Kimberly Resnick † Book Reviews: - Lisa Zunshine, editor, Introduction to Cognitive Cultural Studies. Gregory F. Tague, p. 40 - Edward O. Wilson, The Social Conquest of Earth. Wendy Galgan, p. 42 ~▪~ ~ Contributor Notes, p. 45 Announcements, p. 45 ASEBL Journal Copyright©2013 E-ISSN: 1944-401X *~* [email protected] www.asebl.blogspot.com ASEBL Journal – Volume 9 Issue 1, January 2013 Modest Heroism: Beowulf and Competitive Altruism Eric Luttrell Christian Virtues or Human Virtues? Over the past decade, adaptations of Beowulf in popular media have portrayed the eponymous hero as a dim-witted and egotistical hot-head.
  • Iraq: Differing Views in the Domestic Policy Debate

    Iraq: Differing Views in the Domestic Policy Debate

    Order Code RL31607 Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Iraq: Differing Views in the Domestic Policy Debate October 16, 2002 name redacted, Meaghan Marshall, name redacted Research Associates Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division name redacted Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Iraq: Differing Views in the Domestic Policy Debate Summary The debate over whether, when, and how to prosecute a major U.S. military intervention in Iraq and depose Saddam Hussein is complex, despite a general consensus in Washington that the world would be much better off if Hussein were not in power. Although most U.S. observers, for a variety of reasons, would prefer some degree of allied or U.N. support for military intervention in Iraq, some observers believe that the United States should act unilaterally even without such multilateral support. Some commentators argue for a stronger, more committed version of the current policy approach toward Iraq and leave war as a decision to reach later, only after exhausting additional means of dealing with Hussein’s regime. A number of key questions are raised in this debate, such as: 1) is war on Iraq linked to the war on terrorism and to the Arab-Israeli dispute; 2) what effect will a war against Iraq have on the war against terrorism; 3) are there unintended consequences of warfare, especially in this region of the world; 4) what is the long- term political and financial commitment likely to accompany regime change and possible democratization in this highly divided, ethnically diverse country; 5) what are the international consequences (e.g., to European allies, Russia, and the world community) of any U.S.
  • 0714685003.Pdf

    0714685003.Pdf

    CONTENTS Foreword xi Acknowledgements xiv Acronyms xviii Introduction 1 1 A terrorist attack in Italy 3 2 A scandal shocks Western Europe 15 3 The silence of NATO, CIA and MI6 25 4 The secret war in Great Britain 38 5 The secret war in the United States 51 6 The secret war in Italy 63 7 The secret war in France 84 8 The secret war in Spain 103 9 The secret war in Portugal 114 10 The secret war in Belgium 125 11 The secret war in the Netherlands 148 12 The secret war in Luxemburg 165 ix 13 The secret war in Denmark 168 14 The secret war in Norway 176 15 The secret war in Germany 189 16 The secret war in Greece 212 17 The secret war in Turkey 224 Conclusion 245 Chronology 250 Notes 259 Select bibliography 301 Index 303 x FOREWORD At the height of the Cold War there was effectively a front line in Europe. Winston Churchill once called it the Iron Curtain and said it ran from Szczecin on the Baltic Sea to Trieste on the Adriatic Sea. Both sides deployed military power along this line in the expectation of a major combat. The Western European powers created the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) precisely to fight that expected war but the strength they could marshal remained limited. The Soviet Union, and after the mid-1950s the Soviet Bloc, consistently had greater numbers of troops, tanks, planes, guns, and other equipment. This is not the place to pull apart analyses of the military balance, to dissect issues of quantitative versus qualitative, or rigid versus flexible tactics.
  • 1 December 19, 2019 the Psychology of Online Political Hostility

    1 December 19, 2019 the Psychology of Online Political Hostility

    The Psychology of Online Political Hostility: A Comprehensive, Cross-National Test of the Mismatch Hypothesis Alexander Bor* & Michael Bang Petersen Department of Political Science Aarhus University August 30, 2021 Please cite the final version of this paper published in the American Political Science Review at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000885. Abstract Why are online discussions about politics more hostile than offline discussions? A popular answer argues that human psychology is tailored for face-to-face interaction and people’s behavior therefore changes for the worse in impersonal online discussions. We provide a theoretical formalization and empirical test of this explanation: the mismatch hypothesis. We argue that mismatches between human psychology and novel features of online environments could (a) change people’s behavior, (b) create adverse selection effects and (c) bias people’s perceptions. Across eight studies, leveraging cross-national surveys and behavioral experiments (total N=8,434), we test the mismatch hypothesis but only find evidence for limited selection effects. Instead, hostile political discussions are the result of status-driven individuals who are drawn to politics and are equally hostile both online and offline. Finally, we offer initial evidence that online discussions feel more hostile, in part, because the behavior of such individuals is more visible than offline. Acknowledgements This research has benefitted from discussions with Vin Arceneaux, Matt Levendusky, Mark Van Vugt, John Tooby, and members of the Research on Online Political Hostility (ROHP) group, among many others. We are grateful for constructive comments to workshop attendees at the Political Behavior Section of Aarhus University, at the NYU-SMAPP Lab, at the NYU Social Justice Lab, at the Hertie School, and to conference audiences at APSA 2019, HBES 2019, and ROPH 2020.
  • Disgust: Evolved Function and Structure

    Disgust: Evolved Function and Structure

    Psychological Review © 2012 American Psychological Association 2013, Vol. 120, No. 1, 65–84 0033-295X/13/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0030778 Disgust: Evolved Function and Structure Joshua M. Tybur Debra Lieberman VU University Amsterdam University of Miami Robert Kurzban Peter DeScioli University of Pennsylvania Brandeis University Interest in and research on disgust has surged over the past few decades. The field, however, still lacks a coherent theoretical framework for understanding the evolved function or functions of disgust. Here we present such a framework, emphasizing 2 levels of analysis: that of evolved function and that of information processing. Although there is widespread agreement that disgust evolved to motivate the avoidance of contact with disease-causing organisms, there is no consensus about the functions disgust serves when evoked by acts unrelated to pathogen avoidance. Here we suggest that in addition to motivating pathogen avoidance, disgust evolved to regulate decisions in the domains of mate choice and morality. For each proposed evolved function, we posit distinct information processing systems that integrate function-relevant information and account for the trade-offs required of each disgust system. By refocusing the discussion of disgust on computational mechanisms, we recast prior theorizing on disgust into a framework that can generate new lines of empirical and theoretical inquiry. Keywords: disgust, adaptation, evolutionary psychology, emotion, cognition Research concerning disgust has expanded in recent years (Ola- selection pressure driving the evolution of the disgust system, but tunji & Sawchuk, 2005; Rozin, Haidt, & McCauley, 2009), and there has been less precision in identifying the selection pressures contemporary disgust researchers generally agree that an evolu- driving the evolution of disgust systems unrelated to pathogen tionary perspective is necessary for a comprehensive understand- avoidance (e.g., behavior in the sexual and moral domains).
  • Full Issue File

    Full Issue File

    Biannual of Research Institute for Strategic Strategic for Institute Iranian Review of Foreign Affairs 31 Vol. 11. No.1. Winter&Spring2020 Advisory Board Mohsen Rezaee Mirghaed, Kamal Kharazi, Ali Akbar Velayati, Ahmad Vahidi, Saeed Jalili, Publisher Ali Shamkhanim, Hosein Amirabdolahian, Ali Bagheri Institute for Strategic Research Editorial Board Expediency Council Seyed Mohammad Kazem Sajjadpour Director Professor, School of International Relations Mohsen Rezaee Mirghaed Gulshan Dietl Associate Professor, Professor, Jawaharlal Nehru University Imam Hossein University Mohammad Marandi Professor, University of Tehran Jamshid Momtaz Editor-in-Chief Professor, University of Tehran Seyed Mohammad Kazem Mohammad Javad Zarif Sajjadpour Associate Professor, School of World Studies Professor of School of Mohiaddin Mesbahi International Relations Professor, Florida International University Hosein Salimi Professor, Allameh Tabatabii University Secretary of advisory board Seyed Jalal Dehghani Mohammad Nazari Professor, Allameh Tabatabii University Naser Hadian Director of Executive Affairs Assistant professor, University of Tehran Hadi Gholamnia Vitaly Naumkin Professor, Moscow State University Copyediting Hassan Hoseini Zeinab Ghasemi Tari Assistant Professor, University of Tehran Mohammad Ali Shirkhani Layout and Graphics Najmeh Ghaderi Professor, University of Tehran Foad Izadi Assistant Professor, University of Tehran Iranian Review of Foreign Affairs (IRFA) achieved the highest scientific ISSN: 2008-8221 grade from the Ministry of Science,
  • Music, Art and Spirituality in Central Asia Program

    Music, Art and Spirituality in Central Asia Program

    Music, Art and Spirituality in Central Asia 29-30-31 October 2015 Island of San Giorgio Maggiore, Venice Program 29 October 9:00-10:00 registration and coffee 10:00-10:20 Institutional greetings 10:20 Chair Giovanni De Zorzi (DFBC, University Ca’ Foscari of Venice) Keynote. Jean During: Spiritual resonances in musical cultures of Central Asia: myths, dreams and ethics Session 1. Chair: Anna Contadini (SOAS, University of London) 11:30 From Bones to Beauty in Kyrgyz Felt Textiles Stephanie Bunn , University of St Andrews 12:10 The ‘tree of life’ motif in stucco mihrabs in the Zerafshan Valley Katherine Hughes , SOAS, University of London 12.50-14.30 lunch Session 2. Chair: Giovanni De Zorzi 14.30 Theory and Practice of Music under the Timurids Alexandre Papas , CNRS, Paris 15.10 Sufi Shrines and Maqām Traditions in Central Asia: the Uyghur On Ikki Muqam and the Kashmiri Sūfyāna Musīqī Rachel Harris , SOAS, University of London 15.50 A Musicological Study on Talqin as a Metric Cycle Shared by Spiritual and Secular-Classical Music Repertories in Central Asia Saeid Kordmafi , SOAS, University of London 16:30-16:50 coffee break Central Asian and Oriental Traces in Venice: a guided walk --- 30 October Session 3. Chair: Rachel Harris 9:30 Soviet Ballet and Opera: National Identity Building in Central Asia and the Caucasus Firuza Melville , University of Cambridge 10:10 Russianization and Colonial Knowledge of Traditional Musical Education in Turkestan (1865-1920). Inessa Kouteinikova , Amsterdam-St Petersburg-Tashkent 10:50-11:10 coffee break Session 4. Chair: Alexandre Papas 11:10 The legacy of the Central-Asian mystic Suleyman Baqirghani in the culture of the Volga Tatars: the phenomenon of the Baqirghan kitabı Guzel Sayfullina , Netherlands 11:50 Meetings with jâhrî dervishes in the Fergana Valley Giovanni De Zorzi , University Ca’ Foscari, Venice 12:30-14:00 lunch Session 5.