University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository University of New Hampshire – Franklin Pierce Law Faculty Scholarship School of Law 1-1-2007 Lexis v. Westlaw for Research - Better, Different, or Same and the QWERTY Effect? Jon R. Cavicchi University of New Hampshire School of Law,
[email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/law_facpub Part of the Higher Education Commons, Information Literacy Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, Legal Education Commons, and the Other Legal Studies Commons Recommended Citation Jon R. Cavicchi, "Lexis v. Westlaw for Research - Better, Different, or Same and the QWERTY Effect?" 47 IDEA 363 (2007). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of New Hampshire – Franklin Pierce School of Law at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. 363 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RESEARCH TOOLS AND STRATEGIES LEXIS v. WESTLAW FOR RESEARCH-BETTER, DIFFERENT, OR SAME AND THE QWERTY EFFECT? JON R. CAVICCHi* INTRODUCTION There are synchronistic moments when in the process of writing. While contemplating this article, an email message made its way to my desk, past Pierce Law Center's spam firewall with the following subject ,line: "Pepsi v. Coke-Tell Us--Get $10." Do IP researchers choose Lexis or Westlaw justi fied by taste? Surely you jest, some voice said to me. Repressing this message, I proceeded to compare platform content, perform literature searches, and poll students and IP professors.