DOCSLIB.ORG

Alternative Urban Areawide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alternative Urban Areawide August 21, 2013 ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE City of Rosemount Review 2875 145th Street West • Rosemount, MN 55068-4997 (651) 423-4411 Umore Study Area Rosemount, Minnesota Final AUAR WSB Project No. 1829-06 FINAL ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW UMORE STUDY AREA Prepared For: City of Rosemount August 21, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 1 I.i. INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................ 1 I.ii. INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNED TO SERVE THE DEVELOPMENT ....................................................... 2 I.iii. ANTICIPATED DEVELOPMENT STAGING ....................................................................................... 3 II. SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURES ............................................................................................... 4 II.i. Fish, Wildlife, and Ecologically Sensitive Resources ..................................................................... 4 II.ii. Water Use Mitigation Plan ............................................................................................................ 4 II.iii. Erosion and Sedimentation Mitigation Plan ................................................................................. 5 II.iv. Water Quantity and Quality Mitigation Plan ................................................................................ 5 II.v. Wastewater Mitigation Plan ......................................................................................................... 7 II.vi. Geologic Hazards and Soil Conditions Mitigation Plan ................................................................. 7 II.vii. Transportation Mitigation Plan ..................................................................................................... 8 II.viii. Noise Mitigation Plan ................................................................................................................ 9 II.ix. Nearby Resources Mitigation Plan ................................................................................................ 9 II.x. Visual Impact Mitigation Plan ....................................................................................................... 9 II.xi. Compatibility with Land Use Regulations Mitigation Plan ............................................................ 9 III. UMORE STUDY AREA AUAR ............................................................................................................ 11 1) PROJECT TITLE ......................................................................................................................... 11 2) PROPOSER ............................................................................................................................... 11 3) RGU ......................................................................................................................................... 11 4) REASON FOR EAW PREPARATION ........................................................................................... 11 5) PROJECT LOCATION ................................................................................................................. 11 6) DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................................... 11 7) PROJECT MAGNITUDE ............................................................................................................. 16 8) PERMITS AND APPROVALS ...................................................................................................... 17 9) LAND USE ................................................................................................................................ 19 10) COVER TYPES ....................................................................................................................... 32 11) FISH, WILDLIFE, AND ECOLOGICALLY SENSITIVE RESOURCES ............................................. 33 12) PHYSICAL IMPACTS ON WATER RESOURCES. ..................................................................... 39 13) WATER USE. ........................................................................................................................ 40 14) WATER-RELATED LAND USE MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS ..................................................... 53 15) WATER SURFACE USE .......................................................................................................... 54 16) EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION ......................................................................................... 54 17) WATER QUALITY – SURFACE WATER RUNOFF .................................................................... 55 18) WATER QUALITY – WASTEWATER ...................................................................................... 61 19) GEOLOGIC HAZARDS AND SOIL CONDITIONS ..................................................................... 72 20) SOLID WASTES, HAZARDOUS WASTES, STORAGE TANKS ................................................... 77 21) TRAFFIC ............................................................................................................................... 80 22) VEHICLE-RELATED AIR EMISSIONS ...................................................................................... 94 City of Rosemount Table of Contents Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review August 21, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS 23) STATIONARY SOURCE AIR EMISSIONS ................................................................................ 99 24) ODORS, NOISE, AND DUST. ................................................................................................. 99 25) NEARBY RESOURCES ......................................................................................................... 104 26) VISUAL IMPACTS ............................................................................................................... 109 27) COMPATIBILITY WITH PLANS AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ........................................... 110 28) IMPACT ON INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUBLIC SERVICES ..................................................... 113 29) CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ..................................................................................................... 115 30) OTHER POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ............................................................... 116 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 5-1: General Location Map Figure 5-2: USGS Map Figure 5-3: Aerial Photo Figure 6-1: Scenario 1 Figure 6-2: Scenario 2 Figure 6-3: Scenario 3 Figure 6-4: Scenario 4 Figure 9-1: Existing Land Use Figure 10-1: Land Cover Figure 10-2: Land Cover over Scenario 1 Figure 10-3: Land Cover over Scenario 2 Figure 10-4: Land Cover over Scenario 3 Figure 11-1: Ecological Resources Figure 11-2: Rosemount Natural Area Identification Map Figure 13-1: County Well Index Figure 13-2: Municipal Wells and Drinking Water Supply Management Area Figure 13-3 Scenario 1 Water Analysis Figure 13-4: Scenario 2 Water Analysis Figure 13-5: Scenario 3 Water Analysis Figure 14-1: FEMA Floodplain Figure 16-1: Highly Erodible Land Figure 17-1: Subwatershed Map Figure 18-1: MCES Interceptor Location Figure 18-2: Sewer District and MCES Connections Figure 18-3: Scenario 1 Wastewater Analysis Figure 18-4: Scenario 2 Wastewater Analysis Figure 18-5: Scenario 3 Wastewater Analysis Figure 19-1: Soil Types Figure 19-2: Hydric Soils Figure 19-3: Suitability for Dwellings with Basements Figure 19-4: Depth to Bedrock Figure 19-5 Groundwater Sensitivity Figure 19-6: Karst Features Figure 21-1A: Existing Traffic Volumes and Lane Geometry Figure 21-1B: Existing Traffic Volumes and Lane Geometry City of Rosemount Table of Contents Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review August 21, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Figure 21-2: Future Roadway Functional Class Figure 21-3: Traffic Analysis Zones/Major Roadway Network Figure 21-4: Development Traffic Distribution Figure 21-5A: 2030 No Build Traffic Volumes Figure 21-5B: 2030 No Build Traffic Volumes Figure 21-6A: Scenario 1 Full Development Turning Movements Figure 21-6B: Scenario 1 Full Development Turning Movements Figure 21-7A: Scenario 2 Full Development Turning Movements Figure 21-7B: Scenario 2 Full Development Turning Movements Figure 21-8A: Scenario 3 Full Development Turning Movements Figure 21-8B: Scenario 3 Full Development Turning Movements Figure 21-9: Future Projected Daily Traffic Volumes Figure 21-10A: No Build Lane and Traffic Control Needs Figure 21-10B: Build Lane and Traffic Control Needs Figure 24-1: Noise Model Receptors Figure 25-1: Sensitive Resources Figure 25-2: UMore Park Soils Figure 25-3: Parks, Recreation Areas and Trails LIST OF TABLES Table 6-1 Scenario 1 Table 6-2 Scenario 2 Table 6-3 Scenario 3 Table 7-1 Composite Scenarios Table Table 8-1 List of Permits and Approvals Table 10-1 Land Cover Table 13-1 Existing Average Day Water Usage and Maximum Day Water Usage for Rosemount’s Water System Table 13-2 Future water demand for Scenario 1 Table 13-3 Comparison of supply and storage included in CWP and Scenario 1. Table 13-4 Future water demands for Scenario 2 Table 13-5 Comparison of supply and storage included in CWP and Scenario 2. Table 13-6 Future water demands for Scenario 3 Table 13-7 Comparison of supply and storage included in CWP and Scenario 3. Table 17-1 Existing and Proposed Runoff Volumes Table 17-2 Total Suspended Solids and Total Phosphorus Loads Table
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inland Zone Sub-Area Contingency Plan (SACP) for Minneapolis/St
    EPA REGION 5 INLAND ZONE SUB-AREA CONTINGENCY PLAN Inland Zone Sub-Area Contingency Plan (SACP) for Minneapolis/St. Paul December 2020 Sub-Area Contingency Plan i Minneapolis/St. Paul Letter of Review Minneapolis/St. Paul Inland Zone Sub-Area Contingency Plan (SACP) This SACP has been prepared by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the direction of the Federal On-Scene Coordinator (OSC) with collaboration from stakeholders of the Minneapolis/St. Paul Inland Zone Sub-Area. This SACP has been prepared for the use of all agencies engaged in responding to environmental emergencies and contains useful tools for responders, providing practical and accessible information about who and what they need to know for an effective response. This SACP is not intended to serve as a prescriptive plan for response but as a mechanism to ensure responders have access to essential sub-area specific information and to promote interagency coordination for an effective response. This SACP includes links to documents and information on non-EPA sites. Links to non-EPA sites and documents do not imply any official EPA endorsement of, or responsibility for, the opinions, ideas, data or products presented at those locations, or guarantee the validity of the information provided. David Morrison Federal On-Scene Coordinator United States Environmental Protection Agency Superfund & Emergency Management Division Region 5 Sub-Area Contingency Plan ii Minneapolis/St. Paul Record of Change Change SACP Description of Change Initials Date Number Section 1 all EPA R5 2020 New Sub Area Format – IAP w/main body plan DHM 12/22/2020 Sub-Area Contingency Plan iii Minneapolis/St.
    [Show full text]
  • Ricard Missoula MT Daniel Aagenes Cleveland Cliffs Hibbing Taconite Hibbing MN Jason Aagenes Cleveland-Cliffs Inc
    First Name Last Name Company City State Erin (Stevens) Ricard Missoula MT Daniel Aagenes Cleveland Cliffs Hibbing Taconite Hibbing MN Jason Aagenes Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. Eveleth MN Aleesha Aasved Butte MT Behrooz Abbasi University of Nevada Reno Reno NV Charles Abbey Missouri University of Science and Technology Rolla MO Jamie Aberle Freeport-McMoRan Inc Clifton AZ Chris Abraham Marquette MI Adele Abrams Law Office of Adele L Abrams PC Beltsville MD Chandler Absher University of Kentucky Nancy KY Chandler Absher University of Kentucky Department of Mining Engine Lexington KY Sevket Acar Kissimmee FL Yovani Achata Instituto de Ingenieros de Minas del Peru (IIMP) La Molina Louis Ackah Southern Illinois University at Carbondale Carbondale IL Gina Acker Caterpillar Inc - Global Mining Deerfield IL Blake Acton Solvay Tempe AZ John Adair Standard Minerals, LLC Port Huron MI Belinda Adams Eirich Machines, Inc Gurnee IL Brent Adams Komatsu Equipment Company Elko NV Bryan Adams Yellow Jacket Drilling Services Phoenix AZ Justin Adams US Steel Minnesota Ore Operations Biwabik MN Kim Adams InfoMine Inc Vancouver BC Opal Adams Geo-Logic Associates Ontario CA Stephen Adams Mount Dora FL Douglas Addo University of Kentucky Erlanger KY Anthony Adun University of Arizona Tucson AZ Diwaker Aduri GIW Industries, Inc (A KSB Company) Grovetown GA Eleftheria Agioutanti Blacksburg VA Kitty Agioutantis Lexington KY Zacharias Agioutantis University of Kentucky Lexington KY Mikel Agirregabiria Ulma Conveyor Components Otxandio Keith Agner Miner Elastomer Products Geneva IL Domenic Aguilar Reno NV Rene Aguilar Antofagasta Minerals Las Condes David Aguilera Miller Sales & Engineering Tucson AZ Mikel Aguirregabiria Ulma Conveyor Components Otxandio John Ahart RDO Integrated Controls Bloomington MT Jason Ahlin Brahma Group, Inc Salt Lake City UT Usman Ahmad Mittelsachsen Junmo Ahn University of Arizona Tucson AZ Risto Ahvo The Switch Oak Creek WI Lee Aiken MTS Sensors Cary NC James Aiken, P.G.
    [Show full text]
  • Pine Bend Arterial Connector Study Report
    FigureAREA STUDIES1 Area Studies Mendota South Saint Paul th Ave 14 ?cA@ 63 20 e v ?cA@ Mendota Heights A e C %&c( r o a n w c a o ?©A@ l Sunfish Lake r ?tA@ e d D )p S t %&f( S 31 %&f( 73 A r g e ?ØA@ n t a d T R r Lone Oak R 70th St W W Robert St b d 26 26 o REGIONAL ROADWAY n K t 56 lo ?±A@ i P VISIONING?§A@ Yankee Doodle Rd 80th St E 28 28 STUDY E 43 d v ?tA@ ?ØA@ l B rd Inver Grove Heights co e n v Co A Eagan n o t g n i x 73 31 e L 30 30 Diffley Rd )p %&c( 105th St HIGHWAY 32 Cli ff Rd 32 110th St W CLIFF ROAD STUDY 71 R i c h V a l 73 l ?éA@ ?§A@ e 125th St W y B l v s Rd d ndrew McA PINE BEND 38 E e v A e AREA STUDYn i a l 33 B Apple Valley Rosemount 145th St W 145th St E 150th St W 42 )p 46 160th St W 46 Coates 31 Dodd Blvd ROSEMOUNT/EMPIRE/UMORE Pilot Pilot Knob Rd TRANSPORTATION STUDY ?éA@ Farmington ?§A@ Empire Township CedarAve 200th St W 200th St E 66 0 1 2 [ Miles DAKOTADAKOTA COUNTY COUNTY ARTERIALARTERIAL CONNECTORCONNECTOR STUDY PINEPINE BEND BEND AREAAREA Table of Contents 1.0 Study Overview ..................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Existing Conditions and Future Visioning ......................................................... 5 3.0 Alternative Development and Preliminary Screening ................................
    [Show full text]
  • Midwest and Rocky Mountain Transportation Fuels Markets
    Midwest and Rocky Mountain Transportation Fuels Markets March 2017 Independent Statistics & Analysis U.S. Department of Energy www.eia.gov Washington, DC 20585 This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA’s data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the U.S. Department of Energy or other federal agencies. U.S. Energy Information Administration | Midwest and Rocky Mountain Transportation Fuels Markets i March 2017 Introduction A new study commissioned by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), find that changes in North American energy markets over the past decade have strengthened the supply of transportation fuels including motor gasoline, distillates, and jet fuel in the Midwest and Rocky Mountain regions. The development of Canadian oil sands crude and the emergence of light, tight crude oil in the United States have provided refiners in the Midwest and Rocky Mountain regions with access to abundant, cost-advantaged crude supply, providing opportunities to optimize crude slates and expand refinery capacity and utilization. Increased refinery production, combined with moderating demands for transportation fuels, has enabled suppliers in the Midwest and Rocky Mountain regions to reduce their dependence on inbound transportation fuels supply from the Gulf Coast, and has enhanced the redundancy and resiliency of their transportation fuels supply chains. Refinery capacity and production of transportation fuels in the Midwest and Rocky Mountain regions grew significantly between 2005 and 2015, and fuels markets and supply chains in these regions have become increasingly self-sufficient.
    [Show full text]
  • Koch Industries, Inc. Strategie Corporate Research Report
    Office of Labor Education Research Cornell ILR School Koch Industries, Inc. Strategie Corporate Research Report Patrick Young, Ed Yoo, Robert Wesley Hannah, Iris Packman, and Jordan Wells Under the supervision of Kate Bronfenbrenner Labor Education Research Cornell University School of Labor and Industrial Relations June 2006 1. Executive Sum m ary...................................................................................... .................................. .1 1.1 Description of Firm and its Operations....,,.............................. ..................................................1 1.2 Profit Centers............... ............ .......... ....................................................................................... 1 1.3 Growth Plan................ ................................................................................................................ 1 1.4 Key Decision Makers...................................................................................................... ........... 2 1.5 Key relationships............... ............................................................................................. ............ 3 2. Introduction ............................ ............................ ........... ................................................................... 4 2.1 Basic information................................... ............................................. ........................ ............... 4 2.2 Company history.............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    OFFICE OF GOVERNOR TIM PAWLENTY 130 State Capitol ♦ Saint Paul, MN 55155 ♦ (651) 296-0001 NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Contact: Brian McClung January 3, 2007 (651) 296-0001 GOVERNOR PAWLENTY APPOINTS KASBOHM TO FORENSIC LABORATORY ADVISORY BOARD Saint Paul – Governor Tim Pawlenty today announced the appointment of Lieutenant Brian Kasbohm, commander of the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office Crime Laboratory, to the Forensic Laboratory Advisory Board. Prior to becoming commander of the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office Crime Laboratory, Kasbohm, of Chanhassen, held positions of laboratory supervisor, crime scene section supervisor, bloodstain pattern analyst, as well as over a decade of experience in the crime scene and latent fingerprint sections of the crime lab. He was also the project manager for the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office Crime Laboratory accreditation with the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors/Laboratory Accreditation Board. Kasbohm is a member of the American Society of Crime Lab Directors, Association of Forensic Quality Assurance Managers, and International Association of Bloodstain Pattern Analysts. Kasbohm is appointed to a position for an individual with expertise in the field of forensic science and will serve a four-year term that expires on July 1, 2010. The Forensic Laboratory Advisory Board was created by the Legislature (Laws of Minnesota 2006, Chapter 260, Article 3) to develop and implement a reporting system through which laboratories, facilities, or entities that conduct forensic analyses report negligence or misconduct that substantially affects the integrity of the forensic results committed by employees or contractors; encourage reporting of misconduct; investigate allegations of misconduct; and encourage laboratory accreditation with the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors/Laboratory Accreditation Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Flint Hills Resources Celebrates 20 Years of Wildlife Habitat Preservation in Dakota County
    News Release ____________________________________________________________________________________ For Immediate Release Media Contact: Chris Duffy [email protected] 612-599-7982 Flint Hills Resources celebrates 20 years of wildlife habitat preservation in Dakota County Voluntary conservation efforts through the Wildlife Habitat Council improve habitats, environmental education ROSEMOUNT, Minn. (July 29, 2021) — Flint Hills Resources is celebrating 20 years of preserving habitat and increasing biodiversity with the Wildlife Habitat Council (WHC) through its Conservation Certification® program, a voluntary sustainability standard for habitat and species management and conservation education on corporate land holdings. This certification recognizes conservation efforts at the Pine Bend Bluffs in Dakota County and 2021 marks 20 years since Flint Hills was first certified. Click here to download photos of the Pine Bend Bluffs. Click here to watch a video about Flint Hills’ 20 years of WHC Certification. WHC Conservation Certification is the only standard designed for broad-based biodiversity enhancement on corporate landholdings. For more than 30 years, WHC Certification has recognized meaningful habitat and species management and education programs around the world. Two Flint Hills locations – the Pine Bend Bluffs in Rosemount, Minnesota and the Wildlife Learning Preserve in Corpus Christi, Texas are WHC-Certified. The Pine Bend Bluffs are a natural area surrounding the Pine Bend refinery in Rosemount, Minnesota and Certified Silver by
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 33/Monday, February 22, 2021/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 33 / Monday, February 22, 2021 / Notices 10567 responses. EPA will consider the over the next three years. Second, the questions about individual applicability comments received and amend the ICR growth rate for this industry is very low determinations, monitoring decisions, as appropriate. The final ICR package or non-existent, so there is no or regulatory interpretations, refer to the will then be submitted to OMB for significant change in the overall burden. contact person identified in each review and approval. At that time, EPA Since there are no changes in the individual document, or in the absence will issue another Federal Register regulatory requirements and there is no of a contact person, refer to the author notice to announce the submission of significant industry growth, there are of the document. the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to also no changes in the capital/startup or SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: submit additional comments to OMB. operation and maintenance (O&M) Abstract: Section 1414(c)(3)(A) of the costs. There is a slight increase in costs, Background Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) which is wholly due to the use of The General Provisions of the NSPS requires that each state (a term that updated labor rates. This ICR uses labor in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) includes states, commonwealths, tribes rates from the most recent Bureau of part 60 and the General Provisions of and territories) that has primary Labor Statistics report (September 2020) the NESHAP in 40 CFR part 61 provide enforcement authority under the SDWA to calculate respondent burden costs.
    [Show full text]
  • My Husband and I Live on and Farm the Very Land His Great Grandfather Purchased on February 4, 1892, and Are Proud to Live in Th
    I am asking for your support of this amendment to repeal the exemptions granted to Public Service Corporations in the Eminent Domain Bill, HF 1182. These companies should be held to the same standards as any other entity using eminent domain to procure property for their project. I am describing what may happen to us if the CapX 2020 line goes through our farm as a small snapshot of what is played out throughout Minnesota all too often. My husband and I live on and farm the very land his great grandfather purchased on February 4, 1892, and are proud to live in the house his grandfather started building in 1904. Our farm has been declared a century farm by the state of Minnesota. Over the years we’ve made many improvements to the farm and vintage home. We’ve also improved our 140 acres of farmland by tiling, maintaining grass waterways, contour plantings on hills, minimum tillage and added organic material to build and maintain topsoil. The farm, in return, has been good to us and we have been able to maintain a comfortable living farming. Our son has been operating the farm with us for the last several years. We make our living on this farm and have reinvested much of the proceeds back into the farm. We thought our farm was a very good investment and had planned to derive our retirement income from it. We have maintained a lifestyle which we felt would ensure good health well into our retirement. Now CapX is proposing to build part of their 247 mile double 345 kV transmission line from Brookings to Hampton through our area including through the middle of our farm fields with a mile of line through the middle of our fields.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Safety Awards Event
    New Orleans Marriott 2017 Safety New Orleans, Louisiana Awards Event May 18, 2017 FACES OF THE INDUSTRY American Fuel & #SAFETY17 Petrochemical Manufacturers afpm.org AFPM SAFETY AWARDS PROGRAM The presentation of the AFPM AFPM CONGRATULATES ALL Safety Award plaques is part of a comprehensive safety awards program OF THIS YEAR’S AWARD which the Association’s Safety & Health RECIPIENTS ON THEIR Committee has developed to promote safety performance achievements in OUTSTANDING ACHIEVEMENTS. the petroleum refining, petrochemical manufacturing, and contracting industries and to publicly recognize the excellent BEST WISHES FOR A SAFE 2017. record of safety in operations which the industries and contractors have achieved. AFPM Safety Awards are based on records kept for employees in accordance with OSHA record keeping requirements as defined by law and entered on the OSHA 300A summary TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Distinguished Safety Award form and API RP 754, Process Safety Elite Gold Safety Award Performance Indicators for the Refining Elite Silver Safety Award and Petrochemical Industries. 3 Operating Member Awards 2016 The Safety Awards Program honors AFPM Regular member companies 5 Contractor Awards operating U.S. refineries and petrochemical manufacturing plants as 12 Quick Reference Alphabetical well as Associate member contractors working in those facilities. The program 15 AFPM Safety and Health Committee consists of the following awards. 17 News Release MASTERS OF Master of Ceremonies CEREMONIES Robert Bahr Global Process Safety & Risk Manager
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Pepin and Mississippi River Eutrophication TMDL
    Lake Pepin and Mississippi River Eutrophication Total Maximum Daily Load Report April 2021 wq-iw9-22e Authors and contributors: Lake Pepin Legacy Alliance Minnesota Pollution Control Minnesota Department of Agency Natural Resources Mike McKay Anna Bosch Rob Burdis Rylee Main Wayne Cords Scot Johnson Mac Becco Duane Duncanson Megan Moore Jinny Fricke LimnoTech, Inc. Lee Ganske Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Nicholas Grewe Marco Graziani Kevin Kirsch Hans Holmberg Steven Heiskary Patrick Oldenburg Dendy Lofton Scott Maclean John Sullivan Todd Redder Cathy Malakowsky Scott Wade Hafiz Munir Metropolitan Council Joe DePinto Rachel Olmanson Kent Johnson Wendy Larson Norman Senjem Cathy Larson Ed Verhamme Glenn Skuta Judy Sventek Mike Trojan Dave Wall Minnesota Department of Agriculture Dennis Wasley Larry Gunderson Lake Pepin TMDL Science Justin Watkins Advisory Panel Lake Pepin TMDL Stakeholder Chris Zadak Advisory Committee Lake Pepin Watershed Phosphorus TMDLs Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Contents List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................ v List of Figures ....................................................................................................................................... v Acronyms .......................................................................................................................................... viii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Civil (Consumer Protection) State Of
    STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF RAMSEY SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT Case Type: Civil (Consumer Protection) State of Minnesota, by its Attorney General, Court File No. ____________ Keith Ellison, Plaintiff, COMPLAINT vs. American Petroleum Institute, Exxon Mobil Corporation, ExxonMobil Oil Corporation, Koch Industries, Inc., Flint Hills Resources LP, Flint Hills Resources Pine Bend, Defendants. The State of Minnesota, by its Attorney General, Keith Ellison, for its Complaint against Defendants alleges as follows: INTRODUCTION 1. Minnesota is in the midst of a climate-change crisis. The world has already warmed approximately two degrees Fahrenheit (F) due to human-caused climate change; Minnesota has warmed even more. Warming will continue with devastating economic and public-health consequences across the state and, in particular, disproportionately impact people living in poverty and people of color. 2. The economic devastation and public-health impacts from climate change were caused, in large part, by a campaign of deception that Defendants orchestrated and executed with disturbing success. 3. Previously unknown internal documents were recently discovered that confirm that Defendants well understood the devastating effects that their products would cause to the climate, including Minnesota, dating back to the 1970s and 1980s. But Defendants did not ever disclose to the public—or to Minnesotans—their actual knowledge that would confirm the very science they sought to undermine. Instead, Defendants, both directly and through proxies, engaged in a public-relations campaign that was not only false, but also highly effective. This campaign was intended to, and did, target and influence the public, and consumers, including in Minnesota. 4. During the period when Defendants and their proxies were deliberately misleading Minnesotans about the consequences of using their products, Defendants realized massive profits through largely unabated and expanded extraction, production, promotion, marketing, and sale of their fossil-fuel products.
    [Show full text]