DOCSLIB.ORG

Koch Industries, Inc. Strategie Corporate Research Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Koch Industries, Inc. Strategie Corporate Research Report Office of Labor Education Research Cornell ILR School Koch Industries, Inc. Strategie Corporate Research Report Patrick Young, Ed Yoo, Robert Wesley Hannah, Iris Packman, and Jordan Wells Under the supervision of Kate Bronfenbrenner Labor Education Research Cornell University School of Labor and Industrial Relations June 2006 1. Executive Sum m ary...................................................................................... .................................. .1 1.1 Description of Firm and its Operations....,,.............................. ..................................................1 1.2 Profit Centers............... ............ .......... ....................................................................................... 1 1.3 Growth Plan................ ................................................................................................................ 1 1.4 Key Decision Makers...................................................................................................... ........... 2 1.5 Key relationships............... ............................................................................................. ............ 3 2. Introduction ............................ ............................ ........... ................................................................... 4 2.1 Basic information................................... ............................................. ........................ ............... 4 2.2 Company history.............................................................................. .........................................,.5 2.2.1 The Birth of a Giant..............................................................................................................5 2.2 Georgia-Pacific Buy Out...... ...................................................... ...................... .........................6 2.3 Growth Structure................... .................................................................... ................................6 3. Operations.............................................................. ............................................................................. 7 3.1 Paper Operations......................................................................................................... ................7 3.1.1 Overview................. ............................................................................................ ..................7 3.1.2 Products..................... .......... ............................................................................................... .7 3.1.3 Workforce........................................... ............ .....................................................................9 3.1.4 Facilities.................... ................................................. ........... ........... .................................10 3.1.5 Raw Materials/Suppliers................................................ .................................................... 11 3.1.6 Customers and Clients..................................................................... ..................................11 3.2 Petroleum Operations.... .............. ............. ............................................. .................................12 3.2.1 Overview................................. ................................................................................ ...........12 3.2.2 Products..................................................... ........... ...............................................................12 3.2.3 Workforce................................................................................................ ........... .............. 13 3.2.4 Facilities...................................................................... ........................................................ 14 3.2.5 Raw Materials / Suppliers.................................................. ......... ......... ........................... 16 3.2.6 Customers / Clients...................................................................... ............ .........................17 4. The Industry and Competitors..... ................................................................................................... 17 4.1 Energy and Utilities.................................................................................................................... 17 4.2 Paper and Paper Product Manufacturing................... ........... ................................................. IS 5. Financial Analysis........................................................................................................................... 18 6. Command and Control....................................................................................................................20 6.1 Management......................................................................... ..................................................... 20 6.1.1 Shakeup in Management after GP Takeover................................................................... 21 6.1.1.1 Charles Koch................................................. ........................ ......................................21 6.1.1.2 David H. K och................................... .......... ........... ................................... ........... ....23 6.1.1.3 David L. Robertson............................................................................... ......... ............ 24 6.1.1.4 Joseph (Joe) W. M oeller.............................................................................................25 6.1.1.5 Richard Fink................................................................................................................ 25 6.2 Board of Directors..... ............... ............ ........................ .......... ..................................... ........... 26 6.3 Business Strategy and Growth Plan............... .......................... ...............................................26 6.3.1 Georgia-Pacific Strategy................................ ....................................................................27 6.3.2 INVISTA Strategy................. ............ ............................ ...................................................28 6.4 Stockholders..................... ......................... ................................................................................28 6.5 Lenders....................................................................... ................................... .......... ................29 7. Outside Stakeholders............................................................................................................... .......29 7.1 Safety and health................. ...................................................................................................... 29 7.1.1 Trends in Health and Safety Violations................................................................. .........30 7.2 Environmental..... .................................................................... ..................................................32 7.3 Regulatory / Legal............... ...................................................................................................... 33 7.3.1 Legal.............. .....................................................................................................................33 7.4 Community.............. .......... ................... ................................................................................... 34 7.4.1 Georgia-Pacific Community Relations................... ........... ........................ ....................34 7.4.2 Community Issues with Koch.................................................... ......................................35 7.4.3 Potential Allies............................ ............................................................................. .........36 7.5 Political...................................................... ...................................... .......................................... 37 7.5.1 Political Contributions................ ......................................................................................37 7.5.2 Top Management in Politics.............................................................................................. 37 8. Conclusion................................ ............. .................................. ................................................... ...38 8.1 Profit Center............................................................................... ............................................... 38 8.2 Growth plans.,,......................................... ............................................ .....................................38 8.3 Key decision makers............................................................. ...................... .............................38 8.4 Key relationships........................................................................... ............................................39 9. Appendices............................................. ..........................................................................................42 9.1 Organization and Operations 9.1.1 Koch Industries (Non-Georgia-Pacific) UNICORE 9.1.1.1 Organized facilities 9.1.1.2 Unorganized facilities 9.1.2 Georgia-Pacific UNICORE 9.1.2.1 Organized facilities 9.1.2.2 Unorganized facilities 9.1.3 Koch Industries subsidiaries
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inland Zone Sub-Area Contingency Plan (SACP) for Minneapolis/St
    EPA REGION 5 INLAND ZONE SUB-AREA CONTINGENCY PLAN Inland Zone Sub-Area Contingency Plan (SACP) for Minneapolis/St. Paul December 2020 Sub-Area Contingency Plan i Minneapolis/St. Paul Letter of Review Minneapolis/St. Paul Inland Zone Sub-Area Contingency Plan (SACP) This SACP has been prepared by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the direction of the Federal On-Scene Coordinator (OSC) with collaboration from stakeholders of the Minneapolis/St. Paul Inland Zone Sub-Area. This SACP has been prepared for the use of all agencies engaged in responding to environmental emergencies and contains useful tools for responders, providing practical and accessible information about who and what they need to know for an effective response. This SACP is not intended to serve as a prescriptive plan for response but as a mechanism to ensure responders have access to essential sub-area specific information and to promote interagency coordination for an effective response. This SACP includes links to documents and information on non-EPA sites. Links to non-EPA sites and documents do not imply any official EPA endorsement of, or responsibility for, the opinions, ideas, data or products presented at those locations, or guarantee the validity of the information provided. David Morrison Federal On-Scene Coordinator United States Environmental Protection Agency Superfund & Emergency Management Division Region 5 Sub-Area Contingency Plan ii Minneapolis/St. Paul Record of Change Change SACP Description of Change Initials Date Number Section 1 all EPA R5 2020 New Sub Area Format – IAP w/main body plan DHM 12/22/2020 Sub-Area Contingency Plan iii Minneapolis/St.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil Slick Spin Cycle
    A f c o u ^ ° ) V y j U f* - i p ffljBg o the National Associa- tion of Manufacturers, Koch Indus- tries is among 700 companies and trade groups that make up the AIR QUALITY STANDARDS COALITION, which opposes the EPA's regulations. Run by NAM, the coalition includes Ford, General Motors, and Exxon, and reportedly boasts a $2 million war chest. O IL S L I C K How to choke off clean air with independent expenditures. AQSC’s spokesman C. BOYDEN GRAY David H. Koch, 56, Wichita, Kan. Party: R and Libertarian. (#87) was Bush's W hite House counsel, When the Environmental Protection Agency announced is chair of Citizens for a Sound last November it would update Clean Air Act standards Economy, and is a lawyer at the to ban dust particle emissions that reportedly cause r law firm Wilmer, Cutler & Picker­ 40,000 p Tiatur - deaths annually big industries sharpened ing, where his clients include their knives. (Final EPA regulations are due by July.) Oil Geneva Steel. companies, automakers, and the nation’s largest manufac­ turers claim it will cost them billions to comply. Among them is David Koch, chairman of Koch Industries, whose oil subsidiary is being sued by the government for Clean Water Act violations, for a reported $55 million. Although Koch gave $339,000 to federal campaigns in 1995-96, it’s only one way he sought influence. He also gives through a .7:; - tangled v. eb of think tanks, PR agencies, and trade associa­ I health study linking a tions, all of which want Congress to gut the Clean Air Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Accelerated Attacks on Clean Energy by Koch Bros
    Checks and Balances Project Documents: Accelerated Attacks on Clean Energy by Koch Bros. $192 Million to 72 Groups Associated with Opposition to Clean Energy Solutions and Climate Change Denial from 1997-2013 $108 Million to At Least 19 Groups to Fight State Renewable Energy Policies 2011-2013 (Over 18 months, Checks and Balances Project conducted the first in-depth investigation into Koch Industries, Inc. AND what we call the Koch Advocacy Network. Over 350 low-profile regulatory disclosures and more than 8,000 legal disclosure forms drawn from over 60 public agencies, databases and courts were examined. Research was completed prior to the 2016 election.) In August 2015 President Obama singled out the “massive lobbying efforts backed by fossil fuel interests, or conservative think tanks, or the Koch brothers pushing for new laws to roll back renewable energy standards or prevent new clean energy businesses from succeeding.” The President described these anti-clean energy efforts as “rent seeking and trying to protect old ways of doing business and standing in the way of the future.”1 Charles Koch responded that, “We are not trying to prevent new clean energy businesses from succeeding” and warned against “subsidizing uneconomical forms of energy — whether you call them ‘green,’ ‘renewable’ or whatever.” He continued, “And there is a big debate on whether you have a real disease or something that’s not that serious. I recognize there is a big debate about that. But whatever it is, the cure is to do things in the marketplace, and to let individuals and companies innovate, to come up with alternatives that will deal with whatever the problem may be in an economical way so we don’t squander resources on uneconomic approaches.” 2 The defense outlined by Charles mirrors the strategy of the network he oversees.
    [Show full text]
  • Money Talks a Realist Constructivist Account of the Motives of 21St Century Plutocrats
    Graduate School Master of Science in Global Studies Major: Political Science Course: SIMV07 Term: Spring 2017 Supervisor: Alexander von Hagen-Jamar Money Talks A Realist Constructivist Account of the Motives of 21st Century Plutocrats Author: Pauliina Parviainen Abstract Plutocracy is a subject that has not traditionally attracted the interest of scholars in the disciplines of International Relations and Political Science. This is unfortunate, as the number and importance of affluent private individuals in global affairs has steadily increased in recent decades. Since most existing academic research on contemporary plutocrats focuses on philanthropists and other ‘benefactors’, this research examines what drives the behaviour of the so-called ‘malefactors’ – in this case, enormously wealthy citizens from the Persian Gulf who fund Islamist extremism and the Koch brothers who fight against climate change mitigation efforts and U.S. government regulations. The research is guided by a realist constructivist hypothesis according to which plutocrats use their material assets to advance ideological causes that in the long run further increase their economic wealth. Qualitative content analysis was performed on select texts that dealt with these actors’ presumable and stated motives. The analysis of the Koch brothers suggested that the logic behind their political adventures closely followed this hypothesis. However, the case of Gulf plutocrats only partially confirmed the hypothesis, as ideological and identity-related reasons prevailed over material considerations in these actors’ motives. Keywords: First Image, Koch, Plutocrat, Realist Constructivism, Terrorism Financing Words: 19 952 Contents: 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Research problem and research question 2 1.2 Structure of the thesis 4 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Koch Millions Spread Influence Through Nonprofits, Colleges
    HOME ABOUT STAFF INVESTIGATIONS ILAB BLOGS WORKSHOP NEWS Koch millions spread influence through nonprofits, colleges B Y C H A R L E S L E W I S , E R I C H O L M B E R G , A L E X I A F E R N A N D E Z C A M P B E L L , LY D I A B E Y O U D Monday, July 1st, 2013 ShareThis Koch Industries, one of the largest privately held corporations in the world and principally owned by billionaires Charles and David Koch, has developed what may be the best funded, multifaceted, public policy, political and educational presence in the nation today. From direct political influence and robust lobbying to nonprofit policy research and advocacy, and even increasingly in academia and the broader public “marketplace of ideas,” this extensive, cross-sector Koch club or network appears to be unprecedented in size, scope and funding. And the relationship between these for-profit and nonprofit entities is often mutually reinforcing to the direct financial and political interests of the behemoth corporation — broadly characterized as deregulation, limited government and free markets. The cumulative cost to Koch Industries and Charles and David Koch for this extraordinary alchemy of political and lobbying influence, nonprofit public policy underwriting and educational institutional support was $134 million over a recent five- year period. The global conglomerate has 60,000 employees and annual revenue of $115 billion and estimated pretax profit margins of 10 percent, according to Forbes. An analysis by the Investigative Reporting Workshop found that from 2007 through 2011, Koch private foundations gave $41.2 million to 89 nonprofit organizations and an annual libertarian conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Ricard Missoula MT Daniel Aagenes Cleveland Cliffs Hibbing Taconite Hibbing MN Jason Aagenes Cleveland-Cliffs Inc
    First Name Last Name Company City State Erin (Stevens) Ricard Missoula MT Daniel Aagenes Cleveland Cliffs Hibbing Taconite Hibbing MN Jason Aagenes Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. Eveleth MN Aleesha Aasved Butte MT Behrooz Abbasi University of Nevada Reno Reno NV Charles Abbey Missouri University of Science and Technology Rolla MO Jamie Aberle Freeport-McMoRan Inc Clifton AZ Chris Abraham Marquette MI Adele Abrams Law Office of Adele L Abrams PC Beltsville MD Chandler Absher University of Kentucky Nancy KY Chandler Absher University of Kentucky Department of Mining Engine Lexington KY Sevket Acar Kissimmee FL Yovani Achata Instituto de Ingenieros de Minas del Peru (IIMP) La Molina Louis Ackah Southern Illinois University at Carbondale Carbondale IL Gina Acker Caterpillar Inc - Global Mining Deerfield IL Blake Acton Solvay Tempe AZ John Adair Standard Minerals, LLC Port Huron MI Belinda Adams Eirich Machines, Inc Gurnee IL Brent Adams Komatsu Equipment Company Elko NV Bryan Adams Yellow Jacket Drilling Services Phoenix AZ Justin Adams US Steel Minnesota Ore Operations Biwabik MN Kim Adams InfoMine Inc Vancouver BC Opal Adams Geo-Logic Associates Ontario CA Stephen Adams Mount Dora FL Douglas Addo University of Kentucky Erlanger KY Anthony Adun University of Arizona Tucson AZ Diwaker Aduri GIW Industries, Inc (A KSB Company) Grovetown GA Eleftheria Agioutanti Blacksburg VA Kitty Agioutantis Lexington KY Zacharias Agioutantis University of Kentucky Lexington KY Mikel Agirregabiria Ulma Conveyor Components Otxandio Keith Agner Miner Elastomer Products Geneva IL Domenic Aguilar Reno NV Rene Aguilar Antofagasta Minerals Las Condes David Aguilera Miller Sales & Engineering Tucson AZ Mikel Aguirregabiria Ulma Conveyor Components Otxandio John Ahart RDO Integrated Controls Bloomington MT Jason Ahlin Brahma Group, Inc Salt Lake City UT Usman Ahmad Mittelsachsen Junmo Ahn University of Arizona Tucson AZ Risto Ahvo The Switch Oak Creek WI Lee Aiken MTS Sensors Cary NC James Aiken, P.G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenge of Success
    Discovery january 2012 THE QUARTERLY NEWSLETTER OF KOCH COMPANIES The challenge of success For many Koch companies – and for Georgia-Pacic’s gypsum and wood And then there is the age-old problem of Koch Industries overall – 2011 was a products businesses – both of which rely overcoming success. record year. on new building construction – suered Charles Koch, KII’s chairman and CEO, Flint Hills Resources led the way, helped as the construction slump in the United has repeatedly warned about complacency by record results from Pine Bend and a States continued. or smugness aer achieving record results. signicant increase in South Texas crude Similarly, INVISTA’s residential oor- He did so in his 2007 book, e Science oil production that beneted its Corpus ing business struggled. With new home of Success, and in his very rst Founder’s Christi reneries. construction in the U.S. at historic lows, Day video, recorded eight years ago. demand for carpet ber is depressed. FHR’s lubricants business also had a record “It is all too easy,” Koch said recently, “to year, and results for the asphalt and chemi- Prolonged drought in the Midwest and assume that things will keep going your cals businesses improved signicantly. wildres in Texas were serious issues for way, or that markets will remain strong Koch Pipeline was busy expanding its e Matador Cale Company. and your competitive advantages will system, especially in South Texas, where And results for Koch Supply & Trading never erode. the Eagle Ford Shale play is boosting and Koch Minerals were nowhere near “Even worse is becoming arrogant or domestic production and bringing new the record highs seen a few years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Infor, Inc. Form 10-K Annual Report Filed 2017-06-26
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 10-K Annual report pursuant to section 13 and 15(d) Filing Date: 2017-06-26 | Period of Report: 2017-04-30 SEC Accession No. 0001193125-17-212858 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER Infor, Inc. Mailing Address Business Address C/O INFOR, INC. C/O INFOR, INC. CIK:1556148| IRS No.: 010924667 | Fiscal Year End: 0430 641 AVENUE OF THE 641 AVENUE OF THE Type: 10-K | Act: 34 | File No.: 333-183494-06 | Film No.: 17929398 AMERICAS AMERICAS SIC: 7372 Prepackaged software NEW YORK NY 10011 NEW YORK NY 10011 (678) 319-8000 Copyright © 2017 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED APRIL 30, 2017 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission file number: 333-183494-06 INFOR, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) DELAWARE 01-0924667 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification Number) 641 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10011 (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code) (646) 336-1700 (Registrants telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the act: None Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Koch Industries, Inc. Completes Purchase of Molex Incorporated
    Dec. 9, 2013 Contacts: Susan Armitage Melissa Cohlmia VP, Corporate Communications Director, Corporate Communication Molex Incorporated Koch Companies Public Sector, LLC 630-527-4561 316-828-3756 [email protected] [email protected] KOCH INDUSTRIES, INC. COMPLETES PURCHASE OF MOLEX INCORPORATED WICHITA, KANSAS/LISLE, ILLINOIS – Koch Industries, Inc. has completed its $7.2 billion acquisition of Molex Incorporated (NASDAQ: MOLX, MOLXA), a global electronic components company. The acquisition was finalized through the merger of Koch Industries’ wholly owned subsidiary, Koch Connectors, Inc., with and into Molex. As a result of the merger, Molex is now an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Koch Industries, Inc., retaining its name and headquarters in Lisle, Illinois. The company will continue to be operated by its current management team. Under the merger agreement, all of the outstanding shares of Molex, including the Common Stock, the Class A Common Stock and the Class B Common Stock were converted into a right to receive $38.50 per share in cash, plus an adjustment of $0.18 per share representing a pro rata portion of the regular quarterly cash dividend. “We’re pleased to welcome Molex’s 36,000 talented leaders and employees to Koch,” said Charles Koch, chairman and chief executive officer of Koch Industries. “Molex is a great company that creates real value for its customers and society and matches up well with our culture and core capabilities.” Dave Robertson, president and COO of Koch Industries said, “This acquisition represents a new platform for growth and innovation for us. We’re looking forward to applying our Market-Based Management® philosophy at Molex to help identify and capture additional opportunities.” Koch Industries/Molex Page Two “Now that the transaction has closed, we are eager to move forward with our new owners,” said Martin Slark, chief executive officer of Molex.
    [Show full text]
  • The Koch's Criminal Justice Hypocrisy in New Hampshire
    CCWWTT::^^RRWW11aa^^ccWWTTaabb´´ 666AAA000===888CCC444 BBBCCC000CCC444 ???AAA>>>999444222CCC 77^^ffccWWTTAAPPSSXXRRPP[[00VVTT]]SSPP^^UU >dc^UBcPcT1XV>X[1X[[X^]PXaTb 77PPbb77ddaacc==TTff77PP\\__bbWWXXaaTT 1 Charles and David Koch pour hundreds of millions of dollars into our political system to advance their self-enriching agenda and elect their puppet candidates. At the state and national level, the Kochs use their unlimited resources to influence policy to suit their political and personal needs while hurting middle class and working families. The policies they favor include cutting taxes for corporations and the wealthy; reducing and eliminating regulations to protect workers, consumers, and the environment; privatizing and cutting both Social Security and Medicare; and cutting other programs, including Pell Grants for college. For decades, the Kochs and their network of dark money political front groups have been pushing the Koch agenda in New Hampshire — perhaps more than any other state in the country — which has benefitted billionaires like the Kochs at the expense of Granite Staters. In 2016, New Hampshire will continue to be on center stage in American politics with the First In The Nation primary, a top- tier Senate race, marquee Congressional contests, an open governor’s mansion, and a number of hot button issues in the limelight. At the same time, the Koch network has promised to spend nearly $900 million to buy elections for candidates who will do their bidding for them. The Kochs themselves admit they “expect something in return” for the millions they spend propping up their candidates, but for candidates, backing from the Kochs comes with a high price tag.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenp Eace.Org /Kochindustries
    greenpeace.org/kochindustries Greenpeace is an independent campaigning organization that acts to expose global environmental problems and achieve solutions that are essential to a green and peaceful future. Published March 2010 by Greenpeace USA 702 H Street NW Suite 300 Washington, DC 20001 Tel/ 202.462.1177 Fax/ 202.462.4507 Printed on 100% PCW recycled paper book design by andrew fournier page 2 Table of Contents: Executive Summary pg. 6–8 Case Studies: How does Koch Industries Influence the Climate Debate? pg. 9–13 1. The Koch-funded “ClimateGate” Echo Chamber 2. Polar Bear Junk Science 3. The “Spanish Study” on Green Jobs 4. The “Danish Study” on Wind Power 5. Koch Organizations Instrumental in Dissemination of ACCF/NAM Claims What is Koch Industries? pg. 14–16 Company History and Background Record of Environmental Crimes and Violations The Koch Brothers pg. 17–18 Koch Climate Opposition Funding pg. 19–20 The Koch Web Sources of Data for Koch Foundation Grants The Foundations Claude R. Lambe Foundation Charles G. Koch Foundation David H. Koch Foundation Koch Foundations and Climate Denial pg. 21–28 Lobbying and Political Spending pg. 29–32 Federal Direct Lobbying Koch PAC Family and Individual Political Contributions Key Individuals in the Koch Web pg. 33 Sources pg. 34–43 Endnotes page 3 © illustration by Andrew Fournier/Greenpeace Mercatus Center Fraser Institute Americans for Prosperity Institute for Energy Research Institute for Humane Studies Frontiers of Freedom National Center for Policy Analysis Heritage Foundation American
    [Show full text]
  • Senate the Senate Met at 11 A.M
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 114 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 162 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2016 No. 23 Senate The Senate met at 11 a.m. and was ZIKA VIRUS August 2013, following time in Jakarta called to order by the President pro Mr. MCCONNELL. Mr. President, just as our Ambassador to Indonesia for 3 tempore (Mr. HATCH). this morning, local health departments years. He served as Ambassador for ASEAN Affairs and as Deputy Assist- f confirmed two cases of the Zika virus in two States bordering Kentucky—In- ant Secretary for the East Asia and Pa- PRAYER diana and Ohio. cific bureau, responsible for relations with Southeast Asia. Earlier in his ca- The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- Americans want a better under- reer, he served in Vietnam, the Phil- fered the following prayer: standing of the administration’s efforts ippines, Hong Kong, Brazil, and Tur- Let us pray. to fight this virus and its spread. key, as well as in the Economic Bu- O God, our help in ages past, our hope Americans want to know what the ad- reau’s Office of Monetary Affairs. for years to come, thank You for our ministration’s funding priorities are Ambassador Marciel will represent us Nation and for the freedoms we enjoy. for combatting Zika in a time of lim- as a new government is formed in Lord, thank You also for the men and ited Federal resources. We appreciate Burma and as America’s policies adjust women who gave their lives that we Secretary Burwell coming today to to those changes on the ground.
    [Show full text]