DOCSLIB.ORG

Oil Slick Spin Cycle

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Oil Slick Spin Cycle A f c o u ^ ° ) V y j U f* - i p ffljBg o the National Associa- tion of Manufacturers, Koch Indus- tries is among 700 companies and trade groups that make up the AIR QUALITY STANDARDS COALITION, which opposes the EPA's regulations. Run by NAM, the coalition includes Ford, General Motors, and Exxon, and reportedly boasts a $2 million war chest. O IL S L I C K How to choke off clean air with independent expenditures. AQSC’s spokesman C. BOYDEN GRAY David H. Koch, 56, Wichita, Kan. Party: R and Libertarian. (#87) was Bush's W hite House counsel, When the Environmental Protection Agency announced is chair of Citizens for a Sound last November it would update Clean Air Act standards Economy, and is a lawyer at the to ban dust particle emissions that reportedly cause r law firm Wilmer, Cutler & Picker­ 40,000 p Tiatur - deaths annually big industries sharpened ing, where his clients include their knives. (Final EPA regulations are due by July.) Oil Geneva Steel. companies, automakers, and the nation’s largest manufac­ turers claim it will cost them billions to comply. Among them is David Koch, chairman of Koch Industries, whose oil subsidiary is being sued by the government for Clean Water Act violations, for a reported $55 million. Although Koch gave $339,000 to federal campaigns in 1995-96, it’s only one way he sought influence. He also gives through a .7:; - tangled v. eb of think tanks, PR agencies, and trade associa­ I health study linking a tions, all of which want Congress to gut the Clean Air Act. .Geneva plant's pollu- and Gottwald (#201). HIRED GUN CITIZENS FOR A SOUND ECO'- " -Y, a lobbying group that advocates "economic IN THE TANK SPIN CYCLE / freedom," has mobilized a The CATO INSTITUTE’S CSE broadcast ads in Chicago (to coincide with EPA hearings $5 million fake grassroots, or Michael Gough co-wrote an there in January on the new regulations), and in Washington, “astroturf,” campaign in 10 op-ed piece claiming the EPA D.C. One radio spot claimed (falsely) that the proposals would states to fight the EPA (see relied on mere “statistical ban fireworks: “Stars and Stripes Forever” played in the back­ “Spin Cycle,” at right). Koch’s association.*’ Koch helps fund ground as a narrator said, “Imagine a new government regula­ foundations have given CSE the libertarian think tank. tion that takes away our freedom to...celebrate our freedom.” $8 million since 1984. In January, Sen. MIKE EN ZI (R- Sen. JOHN WARNED (R-Va.) sits on Rep. DAVID MCINTOSH (R-Ind.), Sen. JAMES INHOEE (R-Okla.) Wyo.) compared the EPA proposal a panel that oversees EPA propos­ chair of a key oversight panel, says chairs the clean air subcommittee. to “death by 10,000 slices, and its als. Weighing in at a February hear­ the EPA has “overreached.” An Echoing Cato, he says the EPA’s victim is the American economy.” ing, he said EPA laws are already ex-CSE staffer, he received $8,500 science relies on “statistical asso­ Enzi took $5,000 from KOCHPAC too strong. He took $5,000 from from KOCHPAC; $2,000 from ciations.” He received $5,000 from and $2,000 from the Koch family. KOCHPAC and $1,000 from Koch. Koch; and $1,000 from Gray. KOCHPAC and $1,000 from Gray. — Ronu sh Ratnesar ami John Cook Selected ISTEA funded Bicycle Projects in Washington KING & SNOHOMISH COUNTY Fiscal Year: FY93 PURCHASE BUSES & BICYCLE TRAN.TRAIL Project Total: $10,097,078 County: King Percent on Bike/Ped: 1 0 0 .0 ^ C-TRAN/WA-90-X1 58 Fiscal Year: /''F Y 9 4 BUSES W/LIFTS,BIKE RACKS, LOCKERS Project Total: ,✓ "$2,238,000 County: Clark Percent on Bike/fjed: 1 0 0 .0 % \ CLARK CO.-NE 78TH STREET Fiscal Yyarf: FY95 X \ WIDEN,C&C,S/W ,BIKE LANES ProjytfTotal: $1,847,115 bajjnty: Clark ^drcent on Bike/Ped: 1 0 0 .0 % STEILACOQM UNION AVE. DESIGN Fiscal Year: FY96 WIDEN,BIKfh^NE,C&G,UTIL,RELOC.ILLU Project Total: $1,765,000 County: Pierce Percent on Bike/Ped: 1 0 0 .0 % SNOHOMISH CO.-INTERUR^AN TRAIL Fiscal Year: FY93 PE,ROWA & BIKE/PED PATH Project Total: $1,599,995 County: Snohomish Percent on Bike/Ped: 1 0 0 .0 % SR90-0.72 TO 1.01 Ml E OTJCT SR5 Fiscal Year: FY92 GR,WALL & BIKE PATJtKc ONSTR. Project Total: $1,579,033 County: King Percent on Bike/Ped: 1 00 .0% SEATTLE-B^ACON AVENUE S. MEDIAN Tt$cal Year: FY93 PE & PftfESTRIAN/BIKEWAY ProjetS^Total: $1,459,340 CoyAfy: King Percent ohsBike/Ped: 1 0 0 .0 % MERCER ISLAND-CBD TRANS IMP PHASE 2&3 Fiscal Year: \ FY95 BIKE/PEDESTRIAN ENHANCEMENTS Project Total: 'X h l 79,000 County: King Percent on Bike/Ped: r'Q0.0% RICHLAND-KEENE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS Fiscal Year: FY9T PE,WIDEN,CHANNEL,C&C,UTIL,BIKE LNS Project Total: $1,041,965 County: Benton Percent on Bike/Ped: 1 0 0 .0 % CLARK CO.-NE 78TH STREET Fiscal Year: FY94 ROWA & WIDEN,C&G,S/W ,BIKE LANES Project Total: $1,013,801 County: Clark Percent on Bike/Ped: 1 0 0.0 % PIERCE CO.-FOOTHILL TRAILS Fiscal Year: FY95.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Accelerated Attacks on Clean Energy by Koch Bros
    Checks and Balances Project Documents: Accelerated Attacks on Clean Energy by Koch Bros. $192 Million to 72 Groups Associated with Opposition to Clean Energy Solutions and Climate Change Denial from 1997-2013 $108 Million to At Least 19 Groups to Fight State Renewable Energy Policies 2011-2013 (Over 18 months, Checks and Balances Project conducted the first in-depth investigation into Koch Industries, Inc. AND what we call the Koch Advocacy Network. Over 350 low-profile regulatory disclosures and more than 8,000 legal disclosure forms drawn from over 60 public agencies, databases and courts were examined. Research was completed prior to the 2016 election.) In August 2015 President Obama singled out the “massive lobbying efforts backed by fossil fuel interests, or conservative think tanks, or the Koch brothers pushing for new laws to roll back renewable energy standards or prevent new clean energy businesses from succeeding.” The President described these anti-clean energy efforts as “rent seeking and trying to protect old ways of doing business and standing in the way of the future.”1 Charles Koch responded that, “We are not trying to prevent new clean energy businesses from succeeding” and warned against “subsidizing uneconomical forms of energy — whether you call them ‘green,’ ‘renewable’ or whatever.” He continued, “And there is a big debate on whether you have a real disease or something that’s not that serious. I recognize there is a big debate about that. But whatever it is, the cure is to do things in the marketplace, and to let individuals and companies innovate, to come up with alternatives that will deal with whatever the problem may be in an economical way so we don’t squander resources on uneconomic approaches.” 2 The defense outlined by Charles mirrors the strategy of the network he oversees.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenp Eace.Org /Kochindustries
    greenpeace.org/kochindustries Greenpeace is an independent campaigning organization that acts to expose global environmental problems and achieve solutions that are essential to a green and peaceful future. Published March 2010 by Greenpeace USA 702 H Street NW Suite 300 Washington, DC 20001 Tel/ 202.462.1177 Fax/ 202.462.4507 Printed on 100% PCW recycled paper book design by andrew fournier page 2 Table of Contents: Executive Summary pg. 6–8 Case Studies: How does Koch Industries Influence the Climate Debate? pg. 9–13 1. The Koch-funded “ClimateGate” Echo Chamber 2. Polar Bear Junk Science 3. The “Spanish Study” on Green Jobs 4. The “Danish Study” on Wind Power 5. Koch Organizations Instrumental in Dissemination of ACCF/NAM Claims What is Koch Industries? pg. 14–16 Company History and Background Record of Environmental Crimes and Violations The Koch Brothers pg. 17–18 Koch Climate Opposition Funding pg. 19–20 The Koch Web Sources of Data for Koch Foundation Grants The Foundations Claude R. Lambe Foundation Charles G. Koch Foundation David H. Koch Foundation Koch Foundations and Climate Denial pg. 21–28 Lobbying and Political Spending pg. 29–32 Federal Direct Lobbying Koch PAC Family and Individual Political Contributions Key Individuals in the Koch Web pg. 33 Sources pg. 34–43 Endnotes page 3 © illustration by Andrew Fournier/Greenpeace Mercatus Center Fraser Institute Americans for Prosperity Institute for Energy Research Institute for Humane Studies Frontiers of Freedom National Center for Policy Analysis Heritage Foundation American
    [Show full text]
  • September 28, 2016 ISSN 1094-5296 Mayer, J. (2016). Dark Money: the Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Ra
    September 28, 2016 ISSN 1094-5296 Mayer, J. (2016). Dark money: The hidden history of the billionaires behind the rise of the radical right. New York: Doubleday. Pp. 464 ISBN-10: 0385535597 Capital, Power, and Education: “Dark Money” and the Politics of Common-Sense A Critical Essay Review of Jane Mayer’s Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right Eleni Schirmer and Michael W. Apple Introduction For years, there have been powerful arguments that education can best be understood as a political act, as strongly connected to the relations of dominance and subordination in the larger society and to the movements that seek to interrupt these relations (see, for example, Apple, 2004, 2013; Apple, M., Au, W., Gandin, 2009). This is even more visible in the current political context of the United States. Regardless of the outcome, the 2016 presidential election campaign has been one of the strangest on record. Perhaps one of the most startling moments of the 2016 primary election came when conservative billionaire Charles Koch stated his potential interest in Democratic candidate Hilary Clinton over Republican front-runner, Donald Trump (LoBianco, 2016). Charles Koch and his brother David, two of the world’s top 10 Schirmer, E., & Apple, M. (2016, September 28). Review of Dark money: The hidden history of the billionaires behind the rise of the radical right, by J. Mayer. Education Review, 23. http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/er.v23.2145 Education Review /Reseñas Educativas 2 wealthiest individuals, have financed infrastructure (Ferguson, 2016). But as income libertarian and conservative political inequality in the United States grows, the role foundations and advocacy groups for the past of political parties becomes almost obsolete, as four decades.
    [Show full text]
  • EXPOSED:The State Policy Network
    EXPOSED: The State Policy Network The Powerful Right-Wing Network Helping to Hijack State Politics and Government CENTER FOR MEDIA AND DEMOCRACY | ALECEXPOSED.ORG November 2013 ©2013 Center for Media and Democracy. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photography, recording, or by information exchange and retrieval system, without permission from the authors. Center for Media and Democracy ALECexposed.org | PRWatch.org | SourceWatch.org 520 University Avenue, Suite 260 Madison, WI 53703 | (608) 260-9713 (This publication is available online at ALECexposed.org) CMD, publisher of ALECexposed.org, PRWatch.org, and SourceWatch.org, has created a clearinghouse of information on the State Policy Network at sourcewatch.org/index.php/Portal:State_Policy_Network and a reporter’s guide to SPN at prwatch.org/node/11909/. Please see these online resources for more information. This report was written by Rebekah Wilce, with contributions by Lisa Graves, Mary Bottari, Nick Surgey, Jay Riestenberg, Katie Lorenze, Drew Curtis, and Sari Williams. This report on SPN is also part of a joint effort with Progress Now called www.StinkTanks.org, which includes information about what citizens can do in response to SPN's secretive influence on the state laws that affect their lives. Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 SPN’s Founding and Role in the National Right-Wing
    [Show full text]
  • The Billionaire Behind Efforts to Kill the U.S. Postal Service by Lisa Graves/True North Research for in the Public Interest
    The Billionaire Behind Efforts to Kill the U.S. Postal Service By Lisa Graves/True North Research for In the Public Interest JULY 2020 About Lisa Graves Lisa Graves is the Executive Director of True North and its editor-in-chief. She has spearheaded several major breakthrough investigations into those distorting American democracy and public policy. Her research and analysis have been cited by every major paper in the country, and featured in critically acclaimed books and documentaries including Ava DuVernay’s “The 13th.” She has appeared frequently on MSNBC as a guest on Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell as well as on other MSNBC shows. She has also served as a guest expert on CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNBC, BBC, C-SPAN, Amy Goodman’s Democracy Now!, the Laura Flanders Show, and other news shows. She’s written for the New York Times, Slate, TIME, the Nation, In These Times, the Progressive, PRWatch, Common Dreams, Yes!, and other outlets. Her research is cited in major books such as Dark Money by Jane Mayer, Give Us the Ballot by Ari Berman, Corporate Citizen by Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, The Fall of Wisconsin by Dan Kaufman, and others. About In the Public Interest In the Public Interest is a research and policy center committed to promoting the common good and democratic control of public goods and services. We help citizens, public officials, advocacy groups, and researchers better understand the impacts that government contracts and public-private agreements have on service quality, democratic decision- making, and public budgets. Our goal is to ensure that government contracts, agreements, and related policies increase transparency, accountability, efficiency, and shared prosperity through the provision of public goods and services.
    [Show full text]
  • Silver Spoon Oligarchs
    CO-AUTHORS Chuck Collins is director of the Program on Inequality and the Common Good at the Institute for Policy Studies where he coedits Inequality.org. He is author of the new book The Wealth Hoarders: How Billionaires Pay Millions to Hide Trillions. Joe Fitzgerald is a research associate with the IPS Program on Inequality and the Common Good. Helen Flannery is director of research for the IPS Charity Reform Initiative, a project of the IPS Program on Inequality. She is co-author of a number of IPS reports including Gilded Giving 2020. Omar Ocampo is researcher at the IPS Program on Inequality and the Common Good and co-author of a number of reports, including Billionaire Bonanza 2020. Sophia Paslaski is a researcher and communications specialist at the IPS Program on Inequality and the Common Good. Kalena Thomhave is a researcher with the Program on Inequality and the Common Good at the Institute for Policy Studies. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors wish to thank Sarah Gertler for her cover design and graphics. Thanks to the Forbes Wealth Research Team, led by Kerry Dolan, for their foundational wealth research. And thanks to Jason Cluggish for using his programming skills to help us retrieve private foundation tax data from the IRS. THE INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES The Institute for Policy Studies (www.ips-dc.org) is a multi-issue research center that has been conducting path-breaking research on inequality for more than 20 years. The IPS Program on Inequality and the Common Good was founded in 2006 to draw attention to the growing dangers of concentrated wealth and power, and to advocate policies and practices to reverse extreme inequalities in income, wealth, and opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Koch Industries, Inc. Strategie Corporate Research Report
    Office of Labor Education Research Cornell ILR School Koch Industries, Inc. Strategie Corporate Research Report Patrick Young, Ed Yoo, Robert Wesley Hannah, Iris Packman, and Jordan Wells Under the supervision of Kate Bronfenbrenner Labor Education Research Cornell University School of Labor and Industrial Relations June 2006 1. Executive Sum m ary...................................................................................... .................................. .1 1.1 Description of Firm and its Operations....,,.............................. ..................................................1 1.2 Profit Centers............... ............ .......... ....................................................................................... 1 1.3 Growth Plan................ ................................................................................................................ 1 1.4 Key Decision Makers...................................................................................................... ........... 2 1.5 Key relationships............... ............................................................................................. ............ 3 2. Introduction ............................ ............................ ........... ................................................................... 4 2.1 Basic information................................... ............................................. ........................ ............... 4 2.2 Company history.............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Carolina Rieger Massetti Schiavon Irmãos Koch
    Pont ifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo PUC – SP Carolina Rieger Massetti Schiavon Irmãos Koch, think tank, coletivos juvenis: a atuação da rede libertariana sobre a educação Mestrado em Educação: História, Política, Sociedade São Paulo 2020 Pont ifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo PUC – SP Carolina Rieger Massetti Schiavon Irmãos Koch, think tank, coletivos juvenis: a atuação da rede libertariana sobre a educação Dissertação apresentada à Banca Examinadora da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, como exigência parcial para a obtenção de título de MESTRE em Educação: História, Política, Sociedade sob a orientação da Profa. Dra. Katya Mitsuko Zuquim Braghini. Mestrado em Educação: História, Política, Sociedade São Paulo 2020 Banca Examinadora “O presente trabalho foi realizado com apoio da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior- Brasil (CAPES) - Código de Financiamento 88887.169610/2018-00. ” “This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES) – Finance Code 88887.169610/2018-00” AGRADECIMENTOS Agradeço à Prof a Dr a Katya Mitsuko Zuquim Braghini, minha orientadora, por compartilhar sua inteligência e erudição e pela perspicácia ao entender o que vinha me afligindo, de modo a dar forma a esta pesquisa. Agradeço à Prof a Da Alda Junqueira Marin, pelo rigor e riqueza das aulas que me proporcionaram uma sólida formação desde o ingresso no programa. Ao Prof o Dr o Jefferson Rodrigues Barbosa, pela leitura cuidadosa e imprescindível contribuição para a continuidade desta pesquisa. Agradeço ao Prof o Dr o Carlos Antonio Giovinazzo Jr., pela sagacidade e precisão na orientação do anteprojeto, quando as coisas ainda nem tinham tomado forma, mas vinham em uma sucessão de pensamentos, incômodos e perguntas.
    [Show full text]
  • Koch Industries, Inc. Strategie Corporate Research Report
    Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Research Studies and Reports ILR Collection 6-2006 Koch Industries, Inc. Strategie Corporate Research Report Patrick Young Cornell University Ed Yoo Cornell University Robert Wesley Hannah Cornell University Iris Packman Cornell University Jordan Wells Cornell University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports Thank you for downloading an article from DigitalCommons@ILR. Support this valuable resource today! This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the ILR Collection at DigitalCommons@ILR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Studies and Reports by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@ILR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. If you have a disability and are having trouble accessing information on this website or need materials in an alternate format, contact [email protected] for assistance. Koch Industries, Inc. Strategie Corporate Research Report Abstract [Excerpt] With its 2005 purchase of paper giant Georgia-Pacific, ochK Industries became the largest privately-held corporation in North America. Originally started as an oil production and refining firm in the first half of the twentieth century, Koch now has major operations in petroleum, chemicals, energy, fibers and polymers, minerals, fertilizers, chemical technology equipment, forest and consumer products, ranching, trading, and securities and finance. The company, based in Wichita, Kansas, employs 80,000 people in sixty countries worldwide. Koch’s oil operations are run primarily through the Flint Hills Resources family of subsidiaries, which has a production capacity of about 800,000 barrels of crude oil daily. Another one of Koch’s major ventures, synthetic textiles, operates through the company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, INVISTA, which produces both consumer and commodity textiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedomworks Putting Its War Chest to Work for ALEC's Anti-Union
    FreedomWorks Putting Its War Chest to Work for ALEC’s Anti-Union ... http://www.prwatch.org/print/11938 Published on PR Watch (http://www.prwatch.org) Home > FreedomWorks Putting Its War Chest to Work for ALEC’s Anti-Union Agenda in the States FreedomWorks Putting Its War Chest to Work for ALEC’s Anti-Union Agenda in the States by Brendan Fischer [1] — January 14, 2013 - 7:57am Topics: Democracy [2], Labor [3], Politics [4] Projects: ALEC Exposed [5] Share this [6] The Tea Party-affiliated group FreedomWorks -- the right-wing organization that helps connect “Tea Party” groups with talking points, rallies, and more -- is gearing up to direct its sizeable war chest towards advancing anti-union initiatives in the states, supporting an agenda set by groups like David Koch's Americans for Prosperity and the Koch-funded American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). This strongly suggests that the battle for the future of private and public sector unions in America is beginning a new phase of combat. This month, FreedomWorks announced [7] "an aggressive grassroots, state-based campaign" for 2013 to "push back against domineering unions," among other plans. The group has been in the midst of turmoil in recent months with former House Majority Leader Dick Armey abruptly resigning after the 2012 elections, in part because of concerns about the ethics of FreedomWorks President Matt Kibbe. In the aftermath of President Barack Obama’s strong showing in battleground states where Matt Kibbe union members turned out in large numbers against Mitt Romney, Kibbe is apparently prioritizing anti-union advocacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery Koch's Philosophy of Philanthropy
    JANUARY 2016 Discovery THE QUARTERLY NEWSLETTER OF KOCH COMPANIES Koch’s Philosophy of Philanthropy Koch companies, foundations, employees Koch sites have the leeway to make “We don’t want to be a micro-manager of and family members all have well- donations that address other types of needs nonprofits, because that stifles innovation. deserved reputations for generosity. in their communities. Molex employees We’re respectfully investing in their visions in Munich, for example, have supported a because we believe they align with ours,” The Salvation Army, American Red Olson said. “We’re very open to new ideas, Cross, and United Negro College Fund local social project that provides resources new partners and new ways of advancing our are among the many organizations that to disadvantaged children. vision of philanthropy.” have made points of applauding Koch’s Georgia-Pacific’s Bucket Brigade program philanthropy. Last summer, a New York has donated more than $1.75 million Unlike some donors, Koch tends to take a publication called David Koch’s donations to dozens of local fire departments for long-term view with charitable investments. “outrageously generous.” equipment, programs and training. It is not the kind of company that writes a check and then walks away or that gives For members of the Koch family, Similarly, FHR’s Pine Bend Refinery money to try to boost its reputation. charitable giving usually reflects personal donated a specially equipped trailer to the priorities. David Koch, a late-stage cancer Dakota County Fire Chiefs Association. “We don’t give to look good; we give to do survivor, has pledged or contributed In Germany, INVISTA’s nylon 6,6 yarn good,” Olson said.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenp Eace.Org /Kochindustries
    greenpeace.org/kochindustries Greenpeace is an independent campaigning organization that acts to expose global environmental problems and achieve solutions that are essential to a green and peaceful future. Published March 2010 by Greenpeace USA 702 H Street NW Suite 300 Washington, DC 20001 Tel/ 202.462.1177 Fax/ 202.462.4507 Printed on 100% PCW recycled paper book design by andrew fournier page 2 Table of Contents: Executive Summary pg. 6–8 Case Studies: How does Koch Industries Influence the Climate Debate? pg. 9–13 1. The Koch-funded “ClimateGate” Echo Chamber 2. Polar Bear Junk Science 3. The “Spanish Study” on Green Jobs 4. The “Danish Study” on Wind Power 5. Koch Organizations Instrumental in Dissemination of ACCF/NAM Claims What is Koch Industries? pg. 14–16 Company History and Background Record of Environmental Crimes and Violations The Koch Brothers pg. 17–18 Koch Climate Opposition Funding pg. 19–20 The Koch Web Sources of Data for Koch Foundation Grants The Foundations Claude R. Lambe Foundation Charles G. Koch Foundation David H. Koch Foundation Koch Foundations and Climate Denial pg. 21–28 Lobbying and Political Spending pg. 29–32 Federal Direct Lobbying Koch PAC Family and Individual Political Contributions Key Individuals in the Koch Web pg. 33 Sources pg. 34–43 Endnotes page 3 © illustration by Andrew Fournier/Greenpeace Mercatus Center Fraser Institute Americans for Prosperity Institute for Energy Research Institute for Humane Studies Frontiers of Freedom National Center for Policy Analysis Heritage Foundation American
    [Show full text]