DOCSLIB.ORG

Midwest and Rocky Mountain Transportation Fuels Markets

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Midwest and Rocky Mountain Transportation Fuels Markets March 2017 Independent Statistics & Analysis U.S. Department of Energy www.eia.gov Washington, DC 20585 This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA’s data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the U.S. Department of Energy or other federal agencies. U.S. Energy Information Administration | Midwest and Rocky Mountain Transportation Fuels Markets i March 2017 Introduction A new study commissioned by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), find that changes in North American energy markets over the past decade have strengthened the supply of transportation fuels including motor gasoline, distillates, and jet fuel in the Midwest and Rocky Mountain regions. The development of Canadian oil sands crude and the emergence of light, tight crude oil in the United States have provided refiners in the Midwest and Rocky Mountain regions with access to abundant, cost-advantaged crude supply, providing opportunities to optimize crude slates and expand refinery capacity and utilization. Increased refinery production, combined with moderating demands for transportation fuels, has enabled suppliers in the Midwest and Rocky Mountain regions to reduce their dependence on inbound transportation fuels supply from the Gulf Coast, and has enhanced the redundancy and resiliency of their transportation fuels supply chains. Refinery capacity and production of transportation fuels in the Midwest and Rocky Mountain regions grew significantly between 2005 and 2015, and fuels markets and supply chains in these regions have become increasingly self-sufficient. Meanwhile, demand for transportation fuels has been stagnant in the Midwest (but has grown in the Rocky Mountain Region), while increasing volumes of renewable fuels—ethanol and biodiesel—have been added to the supply mix. As a result, in-region refinery production of fuels used (net of ethanol and biodiesel inputs) in 2015 has grown to 84% in the Midwest and 101% in the Rocky Mountain region, up from 69% and 97%, respectively, in 2005. Figure 1 compares transportation fuels production with consumption in the Midwest and Rocky Mountain regions in 2005 and 2015. U.S. Energy Information Administration | Midwest and Rocky Mountain Transportation Fuels Markets 1 March 2017 Figure 1. Midwest and Rocky Mountain transportation fuels production and consumption, 2005 vs. 2015 This study is the third and final in a series of reports that examines supply, consumption, and distribution of gasoline, diesel fuel, and jet fuel across the United States. This study focuses on the Midwest and Rocky Mountain regions. The Midwest region comprises 15 states in the north central United States, and the Rocky Mountain region comprises five states in the western north-central United States, corresponding to Petroleum Administration for Defense Districts (PADDs) 2 and 4. Previously published studies focused on the East and Gulf Coasts and the West Coast. This study examines transportation fuels supply, demand, and distribution at both the regional level and for three areas within the Midwest (which are referred to as sub-PADD regions in this analysis). The Midwest and the Rocky Mountain regions cover a large and diverse geography, and supply/demand balances and supply patterns vary within each region. Consequently, the Midwest has been divided into three regions including the Eastern Midwest region corresponding to EIA’s Indiana-Illinois-Kentucky refining district, the Northern Midwest region corresponding to EIA’s Minnesota-Wisconsin-North and South Dakota refining district, and the Southern Midwest region corresponding to EIA’s Oklahoma- Kansas-Missouri refining district. The Rocky Mountain region is not subdivided in this analysis. Each region is depicted with its corresponding states in Figure 2. U.S. Energy Information Administration | Midwest and Rocky Mountain Transportation Fuels Markets 2 March 2017 Figure 1. Map of regions covered in the analysis For each of these regional markets, this study uses 2015 as a base year and takes into account expected changes in infrastructure and supply in subsequent years. Demand includes in-region consumption, movements of fuels to other regions of the United States, and exports to the global market. Supply includes in-region refinery production, receipt of fuels transferred from other U.S. regions and other Midwest and Rocky Mountain regional markets, and foreign imports. Distribution infrastructure includes storage terminals, pipelines, marine loading and unloading facilities, marine vessels, and rail facilities. For this study, ICF, LLC analyzed data and information from EIA, Airlines for America, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center, the U.S. International Trade Commission, and publicly available data on companies and fuels infrastructure from U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 10-K reports, investor presentations, and various other sources. This report completes a series of three studies that EIA has conducted to inform its analyses of petroleum product markets, especially during periods of supply disruption and market change. U.S. Energy Information Administration | Midwest and Rocky Mountain Transportation Fuels Markets 3 Midwest and Rocky Mountain Transportation Fuels Markets A report prepared by ICF for EIA March 2017 Midwest and Rocky Mountain Transportation Fuels Markets March 2017 Acknowledgements This report was prepared by ICF for the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) under the general guidance of Lynn Westfall, Director of Office of Energy Markets and Financial Analysis. Information concerning the content of this report may be obtained from Hannah Breul ([email protected]). Principal contributors from ICF International are Kevin DeCorla-Souza, Matt Gilstrap, and CeCe Coffey. Acknowledgements i Midwest and Rocky Mountain Transportation Fuels Markets March 2017 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................................ i Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................... ii Tables .......................................................................................................................................................... vii Figures ........................................................................................................................................................ viii Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. x Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... xii Study regions ..........................................................................................................................................xiii Midwest (PADD 2) ............................................................................................................................... xiv Rocky Mountain (PADD 4) ................................................................................................................... xv Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................... xv Overview ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Demand ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Supply/Demand balances ......................................................................................................................... 2 Refineries .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Refinery yields ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Supply and logistics ................................................................................................................................... 5 Pipelines ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Trend: Decline in PADD 3 to PADD 2 transportation fuels shipments .................................................. 8 Ports and waterways ........................................................................................................................... 10 Supply vulnerability................................................................................................................................. 11 Midwest (PADD 2) ............................................................................................................................... 11 Rocky Mountain (PADD 4) ..................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • 2019 Annual Report Are Commission-Free

    2019 Annual Report Are Commission-Free

    Table of Contents 1 Letter to Our Shareholders 4 Financial Highlights 6 Our Businesses Midstream Chemicals Refining Marketing and Specialties 7 Our Value Chain 8 Our Strategy Operating Excellence Growth Returns Distributions High-Performing Organization 28 Board of Directors 30 Executive Leadership Team 31 Non-GAAP Reconciliations 32 Form 10-K | ON THE COVER AND TABLE OF CONTENTS Lake Charles Refinery WESTLAKE, LA In 2019, Lake Charles Manufacturing Complex achieved a sustained safety record of more than 55 months, equivalent to 7.5 million safe work hours. 2019 PHILLIPS 66 ANNUAL REPORT 1 To Our Shareholders We have the right strategy in place to create shareholder value, and our employees are executing it well. Phillips 66 achieved 34% total shareholder return during 2019, which exceeded our peer group average and the S&P 100. In 2019, we delivered earnings of $3.1 billion and earnings per share of $6.77. Adjusted earnings were $3.7 billion or $8.05 per share. During the year, we generated $4.8 billion of operating cash flow. We reinvested $3.9 billionback into the business and returned $3.2 billion of capital to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases. We increased our quarterly dividend 12.5% and announced a $3 billion increase to our share repurchase program. Since our formation, we have returned $26 billion to shareholders through dividends, share repurchases and exchanges, reducing our initial shares outstanding by 33%. Operating excellence is our No. 1 priority and core to everything we do. Our goal is zero incidents, zero accidents and zero injuries. We believe this is attainable, and we strive for it daily.
  • Report Document

    Report Document

    VRP Sites as of August 13, 2015 Status VRP_No. Site_Name Volunteer Location Acceptance DatePRA_Date RA_Date LA Type_Site Contaminant IC PM Closed 1001 Rail siding and Big Horn 12/11/00 3/26/02 3/26/02 NFA Letter VRP Petroleum No Not coal load out area Coal 4/26/02; hydrocarbons, applicable Company area metals released from LQD bond Open 1002 Powder River Powder River 1095 West 1/8/01 10/17/01 10/01/07 Certificate of VRP Oil, diesel No Jaymee Energy Sheridan Energy Brundage (Tracts 8, 9, Completion Binion Site Corporation Lane, & 10 only), for Tracts 8, Sheridan, 5/18/09 9, and 10 on 82801 (Tracts 6 & 7 5/8/09 only) Open 1003 Former Conoco Phillips 66 Located 1/2 3/19/01; Approved VRP Petroleum No Sarah Glenrock Refinery Company mile west of 6/28/2011 5/13/02; refinery related Bargsten Glenrock amended amended contaminants South 9/19/02 property additional 54 acres Open 1004 Cheyenne Crude Suncor 199 South 4/4/01 5/30/06 VRP Petroleum No Ben Luckey Station Energy USA, Morrie Av, hydrocarbons formerly Cheyenne Conoco Inc. Open 1005 Union Pacific Former 543 West 4/4/01 7/31/03 1/3/05 VRP Petroleum No Sarah Railroad Chicago and Midwest Av, Hydrocarbons Bargsten North Casper Western Casper Rail Yard Open 1006 Laramie Yard Union Pacific Near 4/4/01 7/09/04 VRP Petroleum No Cindi Fueling Platform Railroad intersection Hydrocarbons Martinez of Railroad and University St., Laramie Yard Page 1 of 29 Status VRP_No. Site_Name Volunteer Location Acceptance DatePRA_Date RA_Date LA Type_Site Contaminant IC PM Closed 1007 Gulley Enterprises Cheyenne 411 E.
  • Sinclair Oil Corporation Annual Report 1955

    Sinclair Oil Corporation Annual Report 1955

    -X7 7 0 Q 0 Q - I f 4. Notice to Stockholders: of The Management will request proxies for the Annual Meeting that a Stockholders to be held on May 16, 1956. It is expected stock proxy statement and a form of proxy will be mailed to meeting holders on or about April 9, 1956, together with notice of and request for proxy. Sinclair Oil Corporation through subsidiaries, engages in all major functions of the oil industry-production, transportation, refining and marketing. Principal oper ating subsidiary companies are listed below, together • : :: c• i . with their primary activities and the locations of their headquarters. Unless otherwise stated, all subsidi aries are wholly owned. SINCLAIR OIL & GAS COMPANY, Tulsa, Oklahoma crude oil exploration and production in the United States. A subsidiary of this company, Sinclair Canada Oil Company conducts similar operations in the Dominion of Canada. SINCLAIR CRUDE OIL COMPANY, Tulsa, Oklahoma purchase and sale of crude oil. SINCLAIR PIPE LINE COMPANY, Independence, Kansas ownership and operation of crude oil and products pipe lines. SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY, New York petroleum refining, product marketing and marine operations. In marketing operations, two Sinclair subsidiaries distribute under their own names in individual areas: Richfield Oil Corporation of New York, New York New England and the eastern seaboard states Hughes Oil Company, Chicago, Illinois Chicago area SINCLAIR RESEARCH LABORATORIES, INC., Harvey, Illinois and Tulsa, Oklahoma--research and development .4 SINCLAIR CHEMICALS, INC., New York petrochemical development and marketing SINCLAIR CUBA OIL COMPANY, S.A., Havana, Cuba J marketing-principally in Cuba . ^A SINCLAIR PETROLEUM COMPANY, New York exploration in Ethiopia SINCLAIR SOMAL CORPORATION, New York Somaliland exploration in Italian "NOTE:The term "Company" in this report is used interchange- 4 or any of its subsidi VENEZUELAN PETROLEUM COMPANY, New York ably to describe Sinclair Oil Corporation all (96.24% owned)--crude oil production and refining aries, individually or collectively.
  • Inland Zone Sub-Area Contingency Plan (SACP) for Minneapolis/St

    Inland Zone Sub-Area Contingency Plan (SACP) for Minneapolis/St

    EPA REGION 5 INLAND ZONE SUB-AREA CONTINGENCY PLAN Inland Zone Sub-Area Contingency Plan (SACP) for Minneapolis/St. Paul December 2020 Sub-Area Contingency Plan i Minneapolis/St. Paul Letter of Review Minneapolis/St. Paul Inland Zone Sub-Area Contingency Plan (SACP) This SACP has been prepared by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the direction of the Federal On-Scene Coordinator (OSC) with collaboration from stakeholders of the Minneapolis/St. Paul Inland Zone Sub-Area. This SACP has been prepared for the use of all agencies engaged in responding to environmental emergencies and contains useful tools for responders, providing practical and accessible information about who and what they need to know for an effective response. This SACP is not intended to serve as a prescriptive plan for response but as a mechanism to ensure responders have access to essential sub-area specific information and to promote interagency coordination for an effective response. This SACP includes links to documents and information on non-EPA sites. Links to non-EPA sites and documents do not imply any official EPA endorsement of, or responsibility for, the opinions, ideas, data or products presented at those locations, or guarantee the validity of the information provided. David Morrison Federal On-Scene Coordinator United States Environmental Protection Agency Superfund & Emergency Management Division Region 5 Sub-Area Contingency Plan ii Minneapolis/St. Paul Record of Change Change SACP Description of Change Initials Date Number Section 1 all EPA R5 2020 New Sub Area Format – IAP w/main body plan DHM 12/22/2020 Sub-Area Contingency Plan iii Minneapolis/St.
  • 2020 Fact Book 2 Our Businesses Our Strategy Midstream Chemicals Refining Marketing and Specialties Energy Research & Innovation Global Asset Map General Information

    2020 Fact Book 2 Our Businesses Our Strategy Midstream Chemicals Refining Marketing and Specialties Energy Research & Innovation Global Asset Map General Information

    Cover Photo: Taft Storage Facility at Gray Oak Pipeline TAFT, TX Contents 3 4 5 OUR BUSINESSES OUR STRATEGY MIDSTREAM Ferndale Ferndale Rail Terminal* Renton North Spokane Tacoma (MT) Yellowstone Cut Bank Moses Lake Thompson 17Falls Rail 24 14 Spokane Terminal Palermo* UROPE DLE EA Portland D Great Falls E I ST Portland (MT) Missoula Rail Terminal M Yello Glacier Sacagawea* Missoula wsto Helena Roundup Keene CDP* ne Billings Crude* Bozeman Billings Billings Humber SPCo & S-Chem ooth Sheridan* Semino Bakk Beart en Bayway MiRO CHEMICALS REFINING * MARKETING AND SPECIALTIES Bighorn e* Linden* Q-Chem I & II Casper* Tremley Pt. (MT)* * Po Rock Springs wd Bayway Rail eminoe er Ri Terminal* S Harbor Red Line Oil North Salt Lake Pioneer ve Des Moines s r Sacramento Rockies Expr Hartford Lincoln ess Line 20 ess Richmond (MT) Rockies Expr San Francisco Denver Borg Conway Kansas City* Po 0 Rockies Expres to Wichita wd Paola er-Den Gold Line* Wood River er Riv Wichita N.* Products* HeartlandPaola* Blue Line 0 Wichita S.* E. St. ver Jeerson City* Junction er Louis* Southern Hills* m Cherokee North* r*Hartford* Line 30 re Line 40 ol Standish* La Junta * h Ponca City* Explo his Ponca City ld Line C Crude* Go 0 Los Angeles Medford* eeMount Vernon* ok t Los Angeles Borger CherEas Torrance Cherokee Colton Borger to Amarillo* Blue LineSouth* Glenpool* Ponca Selmer Line O* * CushPo* Albuquerque* K PL Sk AC ATA Line* elly ST Cushing City SA Oklahoma City* Amarillo* -Belvieu Los Angeles AL Borger Oklahoma Crude* * Explor Wichita Falls* Lubbock* Savannah North
  • September 2008 Fuel Waiver Concerning Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana and North Carolina

    September 2008 Fuel Waiver Concerning Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana and North Carolina

    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 SEP 5 2008 THE ADMINISTRATOR The Honorable Bobby Jindal The Honorable Michael F. Easley Governor Governor State of Louisiana State of North Carolina P.O. Box 94004 20301Mail Service Center Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70804 Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 EeHo~r~e~onn~~ a&-&&- Governor Governor State of Georgia State of Alabama 203 State Capitol State Capitol Atlanta, Georgia 30334 600 Dexter Avenue Montgomery, Alabama 3 6 130 Re: September 2008 Fuel Waiver Concerning Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana and North Carolina Dear Governors: On August 29,2008, to alleviate gasoline shortages created by the extensive mandatory and voluntary evacuations preceding the landfall of Hurricane Gustav, I waived federal regulations requiring low volatility gasoline in Louisiana. Since that time, the shutdowns of several Gulf area petroleum refineries and widespread power outages in the Louisiana area caused by Hurricane Gustav have resulted in the curtailment in the production and delivery of low volatility gasoline to the fuel pipelines originating in the Gulf area that serve each of your states. On September 4' and 5', I received requests made by you, or on your behalf, for a waiver mder theClem &Act (CAA) to address a fuel supply--y------- emergency caused by Hurricane Gustav. In response to those requests, EPA has determined, and the Umted States Department of Energy (DOE) concurs, that it is necessary to take action to minimize or prevent disruption of an adequate supply of gasoline in those portions of Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana and North Carolina in which low volatility gasoline is required. By this letter, I am granting a waiver of those low volatility requirements, as described below.
  • Southeast Response Zone

    Southeast Response Zone

    Colonial Pipeline Company Emergency Response Plans Southeast Response Zone Colonial Pipeline Company TABLE OF CONTENTS Environmental Unit Leader .................................................................................. Generic Field Observer .................................................................................................... Generic Situation Unit Leader ........................................................................................... Generic Resource Unit Leader ......................................................................................... Generic Documentation Unit Leader ................................................................................. Generic NRDA Advisor ..................................................................................................... Generic GIS Trajectory Analysis Specialist ....................................................................... Generic 4.03.06 ICS Responsibility Checklist – Logistics Section ................................................. Generic Logistics Section Chief ........................................................................................ Generic Communications Unit Leader .............................................................................. Generic Support / Services Branch Director ..................................................................... Generic Food Unit Leader ................................................................................................ Generic Administrative Support
  • Transcophapubliccommentr

    Transcophapubliccommentr

    THE GDPH PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSMENT: A NOTE OF EXPLANATION This Public Health Assessment-Public Comment Release was prepared by the Georgia Department of Community Health, Division of Public Health (GDPH) under cooperative agreement with the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund) section 104 (i)(6) (42 U.S.C. 9604 (i)(6), and in accordance with our implementing regulations (42 C.F.R. Part 90). In preparing this document, GDPH has collected relevant health data, environmental data, and community health concerns from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), state and local health and environmental agencies, the community, and potentially responsible parties, where appropriate. This document represents the agency’s best efforts, based on currently available information, to fulfill the statutory criteria set out in CERCLA section 104 (i)(6) within a limited time frame. To the extent possible, it presents an assessment of potential risks to human health. Actions authorized by CERCLA section 104 (i)(11), or otherwise authorized by CERCLA, may be undertaken to prevent or mitigate human exposure or risks to human health. In addition, GDPH will utilize this document to determine if follow-up health actions are appropriate at this time. This document has previously been provided to EPA and the affected state in an initial release, as required by CERCLA section 104 (i) (6) (H) for their information and review. Where necessary, it has been revised in response to comments or additional relevant information provided by them to GDPH. This revised document has now been released for a 30-day public comment period.
  • Being Chapter N-7 of the Revised Statutes of Canada, 1985, As Amended, and the Regulations Made Thereunder;

    Being Chapter N-7 of the Revised Statutes of Canada, 1985, As Amended, and the Regulations Made Thereunder;

    Hearing Order MH-1-2006 NATIONAL ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF the National Energy Board Act (“NEB Act”), being Chapter N-7 of the Revised Statutes of Canada, 1985, as amended, and the regulations made thereunder; AND IN THE MATTER OF an Application by TransCanada Pipelines Limited (“TCPL”) and TransCanada Keystone Pipeline GP Ltd. (“Keystone”) for orders pursuant to Parts I, III, IV and V of the NEB Act; AND IN THE MATTER OF National Energy Board Hearing Order MH-1-2006 dated June 21, 2006. WRITTEN EVIDENCE OF CONOCOPHILLIPS CANADA LIMITED CALGARY:909507.3 INTRODUCTION Q. Please summarize and describe the purpose of this evidence. A. The purpose of this evidence is to describe why ConocoPhillips Canada Limited 5 (“ConocoPhillips”) supports development of the Keystone Pipeline Project. ConocoPhillips is a significant oil and gas producer in Canada. Much of its Western Canadian crude supply, and in particular, incremental supply to be produced from its Surmont Project, is intended to be processed in refinery facilities owned and operated by ConocoPhillips’ parent ConocoPhillips Company and which are located in markets accessed by the Keystone Pipeline Project. The 10 Keystone Pipeline Project will provide ConocoPhillips and others with an important long-term source of reliable, cost efficient transportation capacity at a time when crude oil pipeline capacity to U.S. Midwest markets is strained. As a significant natural gas producer in Canada, ConocoPhillips also provides comments on any negative impacts it sees arising from the proposed transfer and conversion of TCPL’s Line 100-1 15 facilities between Burstall, Saskatchewan and Carman, Manitoba.
  • Holly Energy Partners Announces Definitive Agreement with Sinclair Oil Corporation to Acquire Assets at Sinclair's Tulsa Refin

    Holly Energy Partners Announces Definitive Agreement with Sinclair Oil Corporation to Acquire Assets at Sinclair's Tulsa Refin

    October 20, 2009 Holly Energy Partners Announces Definitive Agreement With Sinclair Oil Corporation to Acquire Assets at Sinclair’s Tulsa Refinery Transaction in Combination with Holly Corporation’s Acquisition of Sinclair Refinery DALLAS – Holly Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE: HEP) (“HEP”or the “Partnership”) announced today that it has entered into a definitive agreement with a subsidiary of Sinclair Oil Corporation (“Sinclair”) to purchase certain logistics and storage assets at Sinclair’s refinery located in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Holly Corporation (NYSE: HOC) (“Holly”), an affiliate of HEP that controls HEP’s general partner, is also a party to the definitive agreement and has agreed to purchase the refining assets at Sinclair’s Tulsa refinery. Under the terms of the agreement, HEP will purchase approximately 1.4 million barrels of storage as well as light products, asphalt and propane loading racks, and an associated refined product delivery pipeline for $75 million comprised of $21.5 million in cash and $53.5 million in HEP common units. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions as well as certain regulatory conditions. In conjunction with the transaction, it is anticipated that subsidiaries of Holly and HEP will enter into a long-term contract similar to others between Holly and HEP under which Holly and HEP will agree to the fees Holly will pay for its use of the assets HEP is acquiring, including a minimum revenue commitment by Holly. HEP expects the transaction to be immediately accretive to its distributable cash flow. Matt Clifton, Chairman and CEO of HEP, said, “This acquisition represents a great opportunity for HEP.
  • Technip Awarded a Services Contract for a Hydrodesulphurization Unit in Germany

    Technip Awarded a Services Contract for a Hydrodesulphurization Unit in Germany

    Technip awarded a services contract for a hydrodesulphurization unit in Germany December 7, 2007 Paris, December 7, 2007 Technip has been awarded by Total an engineering, procurement and construction management (EPCM) services contract, worth approximately €90 million, for a new kerosene hydrodesulphurization* unit. This unit will be built in the Leuna refinery, located near Leipzig, Germany. The contract covers the implementation of a new hydrotreating unit at low pressure. The unit will produce 120 tons per hour of kerosene and light diesel oil, in compliance with the German light heating oil sulphur specification of 50 parts per million. Technip's operating center in Düseldorf (Germany) will execute the contract, which is scheduled to be completed in October 2009. This award marks a new step in the collaboration between Technip and Total in Germany, for whom Technip has already carried out the basic engineering for this project and is currently performing engineering, procurement and construction services in the Leuna refinery. _______ * Hydrodesulphurization is a catalytic refining technology consisting in extracting sulphur contained in a petroleum product either to protect downstream unit catalysts or to maintain sulphur content at the level prescribed by the European norm intended to reduce transportation-related air pollution. * * * With a workforce of 22,000 people, Technip ranks among the top five corporations in the field of oil, gas and petrochemical engineering, construction and services. The Group is headquartered in Paris. The Group's main operating centers and business units are located in France, Italy, Germany, the UK, Norway, Finland, the Netherlands, the USA, Brazil, Abu-Dhabi, China, India, Malaysia and Australia.
  • Ricard Missoula MT Daniel Aagenes Cleveland Cliffs Hibbing Taconite Hibbing MN Jason Aagenes Cleveland-Cliffs Inc

    Ricard Missoula MT Daniel Aagenes Cleveland Cliffs Hibbing Taconite Hibbing MN Jason Aagenes Cleveland-Cliffs Inc

    First Name Last Name Company City State Erin (Stevens) Ricard Missoula MT Daniel Aagenes Cleveland Cliffs Hibbing Taconite Hibbing MN Jason Aagenes Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. Eveleth MN Aleesha Aasved Butte MT Behrooz Abbasi University of Nevada Reno Reno NV Charles Abbey Missouri University of Science and Technology Rolla MO Jamie Aberle Freeport-McMoRan Inc Clifton AZ Chris Abraham Marquette MI Adele Abrams Law Office of Adele L Abrams PC Beltsville MD Chandler Absher University of Kentucky Nancy KY Chandler Absher University of Kentucky Department of Mining Engine Lexington KY Sevket Acar Kissimmee FL Yovani Achata Instituto de Ingenieros de Minas del Peru (IIMP) La Molina Louis Ackah Southern Illinois University at Carbondale Carbondale IL Gina Acker Caterpillar Inc - Global Mining Deerfield IL Blake Acton Solvay Tempe AZ John Adair Standard Minerals, LLC Port Huron MI Belinda Adams Eirich Machines, Inc Gurnee IL Brent Adams Komatsu Equipment Company Elko NV Bryan Adams Yellow Jacket Drilling Services Phoenix AZ Justin Adams US Steel Minnesota Ore Operations Biwabik MN Kim Adams InfoMine Inc Vancouver BC Opal Adams Geo-Logic Associates Ontario CA Stephen Adams Mount Dora FL Douglas Addo University of Kentucky Erlanger KY Anthony Adun University of Arizona Tucson AZ Diwaker Aduri GIW Industries, Inc (A KSB Company) Grovetown GA Eleftheria Agioutanti Blacksburg VA Kitty Agioutantis Lexington KY Zacharias Agioutantis University of Kentucky Lexington KY Mikel Agirregabiria Ulma Conveyor Components Otxandio Keith Agner Miner Elastomer Products Geneva IL Domenic Aguilar Reno NV Rene Aguilar Antofagasta Minerals Las Condes David Aguilera Miller Sales & Engineering Tucson AZ Mikel Aguirregabiria Ulma Conveyor Components Otxandio John Ahart RDO Integrated Controls Bloomington MT Jason Ahlin Brahma Group, Inc Salt Lake City UT Usman Ahmad Mittelsachsen Junmo Ahn University of Arizona Tucson AZ Risto Ahvo The Switch Oak Creek WI Lee Aiken MTS Sensors Cary NC James Aiken, P.G.