Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 33 / Monday, February 22, 2021 / Notices 10567

responses. EPA will consider the over the next three years. Second, the questions about individual applicability comments received and amend the ICR growth rate for this industry is very low determinations, monitoring decisions, as appropriate. The final ICR package or non-existent, so there is no or regulatory interpretations, refer to the will then be submitted to OMB for significant change in the overall burden. contact person identified in each review and approval. At that time, EPA Since there are no changes in the individual document, or in the absence will issue another Federal Register regulatory requirements and there is no of a contact person, refer to the author notice to announce the submission of significant industry growth, there are of the document. the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to also no changes in the capital/startup or SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: submit additional comments to OMB. operation and maintenance (O&M) Abstract: Section 1414(c)(3)(A) of the costs. There is a slight increase in costs, Background Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) which is wholly due to the use of The General Provisions of the NSPS requires that each state (a term that updated labor rates. This ICR uses labor in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) includes states, commonwealths, tribes rates from the most recent Bureau of part 60 and the General Provisions of and territories) that has primary Labor Statistics report (September 2020) the NESHAP in 40 CFR part 61 provide enforcement authority under the SDWA to calculate respondent burden costs. that a source owner or operator may shall prepare, make readily available to request a determination of whether the public, and submit to the John Dombrowski, Deputy Director, Office of Compliance. certain intended actions constitute the Administrator of EPA, an annual report commencement of construction, [FR Doc. 2021–03480 Filed 2–19–21; 8:45 am] of violations of national primary reconstruction, or modification. 40 CFR drinking water regulations in the state. BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 60.5 and 61.06. The General Provisions These Annual State Public Water in part 60 also apply to Federal and System Compliance Reports are to EPA-approved state plans for existing include violations of maximum ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY sources in 40 CFR part 62. See 40 CFR contaminant levels, treatment 62.02(b)(2). The EPA’s written responses requirements, variances and [FRL–10017–01–OECA ] to source or facility-specific inquiries on exemptions, and monitoring provisions in parts 60, 61 and 62 are requirements determined to be Applicability Determination Index Data commonly referred to as applicability significant by the Administrator after System Posting: EPA Formal determinations. Although the NESHAP consultation with the states. To Responses to Inquiries Concerning part 63 regulations [which include minimize a state’s burden in preparing Compliance With the Clean Air Act Maximum Achievable Control its annual statutorily required report, Stationary Source Program Technology (MACT) standards and/or EPA issued guidance that explains what AGENCY: Environmental Protection Generally Available Control Technology Section 1414(c)(3)(A) requires and Agency (EPA). (GACT) standards] contain no specific provides model language and reporting ACTION: Notice of availability. regulatory provision providing that templates. EPA also annually makes sources may request applicability available to the states a computer query SUMMARY: This notice announces the determinations, the EPA also responds that generates for each state (from availability of applicability to written inquiries regarding information states are already separately determinations, alternative monitoring applicability for the part 63 regulations. required to submit to EPA’s national decisions, and regulatory interpretations In addition, the General Provisions in database on a quarterly basis) the made by EPA with regard to the New part 60 and 63 allow sources to seek required violations information in a Source Performance Standards (NSPS); permission to use monitoring or table consistent with the reporting the National Emission Standards for recordkeeping that is different from the template in EPA’s guidance. Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP); promulgated requirements. See 40 CFR Form Numbers: None. the Emission Guidelines and Federal 60.13(i), 61.14(g), 63.8(b)(1), 63.8(f), and Respondents/affected entities: Entities Plan Requirements for existing sources; 63.10(f). The EPA’s written responses to that are potentially affected by this and/or the Stratospheric Ozone these inquiries are commonly referred to action are States that have primacy Protection Program. as alternative monitoring decisions. enforcement authority and meet the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: An Furthermore, the EPA responds to definition of ‘‘state’’ under the SDWA. Respondent’s obligation to respond: electronic copy of each complete written inquiries about the broad range Mandatory under Section 1414 (c)(3)(A) document posted on the Applicability of regulatory requirements in 40 CFR of SDWA. Determination Index (ADI) data system parts 60 through 63 as they pertain to Estimated number of respondents: 55 is available on the internet through the a whole source category. These inquiries (total). Resources and Guidance Documents for may pertain, for example, to the type of Frequency of response: Annually. Compliance Assistance page of the sources to which the regulation applies, Total estimated burden: 4,400 hours Clean Air Act Compliance Monitoring or to the testing, monitoring, (per year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR Website under ‘‘Air’’ at: https:// recordkeeping, or reporting 1320.03(b). www.epa.gov/compliance/resources- requirements contained in the Total estimated cost: $530,000(per and-guidance-documents-compliance- regulation. The EPA’s written responses year), includes $0 annualized capital or assistance. The letters and memoranda to these inquiries are commonly referred operation & maintenance costs. on the ADI may be located by author, to as regulatory interpretations. Changes in Estimates: There is no date, office of issuance, subpart, The EPA currently compiles EPA- change in burden from the most recently citation, control number, or by string issued NSPS and NESHAP applicability approved ICR as currently identified in word searches. For questions about the determinations, alternative monitoring the OMB Inventory of Approved ADI or this notice, contact Maria decisions, and regulatory Burdens. This is due to two Malave, Monitoring, Assistance and interpretations, and posts them to the considerations. First, the regulations Media Programs Division by phone at: ADI on a regular basis. In addition, the have not changed over the past three (202) 564–7027, or by email at: ADI contains EPA-issued responses to years and are not anticipated to change [email protected]. For technical requests pursuant to the stratospheric

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:48 Feb 19, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM 22FEN1 tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES 10568 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 33 / Monday, February 22, 2021 / Notices

ozone regulations contained in 40 CFR of the content. Complete copies of these provides a brief description of the part 82. The ADI is a data system documents may be obtained from the subject matter. accessed via the internet, with over ADI on the internet through the Also included in this notice, is an three thousand EPA letters and Resources and Guidance Documents for abstract of each document identified memoranda pertaining to the Compliance Assistance page of the with its control number. These abstracts applicability, monitoring, Clean Air Act Compliance Monitoring are being provided to the public as recordkeeping, and reporting website under ‘‘Air’’ at: https:// possible items of interest and are not requirements of the NSPS, NESHAP, www.epa.gov/compliance/resources- intended as substitutes for the contents emission guidelines and Federal Plans and-guidance-documents-compliance- of the original documents. This notice for existing sources, and stratospheric assistance. ozone regulations. Users can search for does not change the status of any letters and memoranda by author, date, Summary of Headers and Abstracts document with respect to whether it is office of issuance, subpart, citation, The following table identifies the ‘‘of nationwide scope or effect’’ for control number, or by string word database control number for each purposes of CAA section 307(b)(1). For searches. document posted on October 22, 2020 to example, this notice does not convert an Today’s notice comprises a summary the ADI data system; the applicable applicability determination for a of 59 such documents added to the ADI category; the section(s) and/or subpart(s) particular source into a nationwide rule. on October 22, 2020. This notice lists of 40 CFR part 60, 61, 62, 63 and 82 (as Neither does it purport to make a the subject and header of each letter and applicable) addressed in the document; previously non-binding document memorandum, as well as a brief abstract and the title of the document, which binding.

APPLICABILITY DETERMINATIONS, ALTERNATIVE MONITORING PLANS AND REGULATORY INTERPRETATIONS UPLOADED TO ADI ON OCTOBER 22, 2020

Control No. Categories Subparts Title

1900024 ...... NSPS ...... OOOOa ...... Applicability Determination for Mainline Valve at a Compressor Station. 1900025 ...... NSPS, NESHAP ...... LLL, KKK, OOOO HH ... Applicability Determination for Sweetening Units Installed on a Natural Gas Processing Plant. 1900026 ...... NSPS ...... Ja ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Span Gas Concentration for Total Reduced Sulfur Continuous Emissions Monitoring System for Flares at Petroleum Refineries. 1900027 ...... NSPS ...... J, Ja ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan and Performance Test Waiver for Hydrogen Sulfide Monitoring of Tank Degassing Operations Controlled by Portable Fuel Gas Combustion Devices at Petroleum Refineries. 1900028 ...... NESHAP, NSPS ...... J, Ja, UUU ...... Modification of Operating Parameter Limits in Alternative Monitoring Plan for a Wet Gas Scrubber installed on Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Units at a Refinery. 1900030 ...... NSPS ...... J ...... Waiver Request of the Frequency Particulate Matter Testing for Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit at a Refinery. 1900031 ...... NESHAP, NSPS ...... J, Ja, UUU ...... Modification of Alternative Monitoring Plan to Allow Parametric Monitoring In lieu of Continuous Opacity Monitoring of a Wet Gas Scrubber In- stalled on a Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit at a Refinery. 1900032 ...... NSPS ...... J ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Delayed Coking Unit Installed on Disulfide Oil Oxidation Tower at a Refinery. 1900033 ...... NESHAP, NSPS ...... J, UUU ...... Modification of Alternative Monitoring Plan to Allow Parametric Monitoring In lieu of Continuous Opacity Monitoring of a Wet Gas Scrubber In- stalled on a Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit at a Refinery. 1900034 ...... NSPS ...... XXX ...... Applicability Determination for Expansion of a Landfill. 1900035 ...... NSPS ...... J, Ja ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Hydrogen Sulfide Monitoring of Storage Tank, Process Unit Vessel, and Piping Degassing Operations Controlled by Portable Fuel Gas Combustion Devices at Petroleum Refineries. 1900036 ...... NSPS ...... Db ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan to Allow Predictive Emissions Monitoring In lieu of Continuous Emission Monitoring of NOX Emissions from a Boiler at a Packaging Facility. 1900037 ...... NSPS ...... Db ...... Extension Due to Force Majeure Events of Initial Performance Test of NOX Emissions from a Boiler at a Mining Company. 1900038 ...... NSPS ...... Ja ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Span Gas Range for NOX Continuous Emissions Monitoring System for Heaters at a Petroleum Refinery. 1900039 ...... NSPS ...... UUU ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Wet Scrubbers on Fluidized Bed Dryers at Non-metallic Mineral Processing Facilities. 2000001 ...... NSPS ...... OOO ...... Regulatory Interpretation for Vibratory Feeders at a Limestone Quarry. 2000003 ...... NSPS ...... EEEE ...... Applicability Determination for Rural Institutional Waste Incinerators. 2000004 ...... NESHAP, NSPS ...... Db, DDDDD ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Biomass Boiler at Kraft Pulp Mill. 2000005 ...... NSPS ...... A, J, Ja ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan and Performance Testing Waiver for Hydrogen Sulfide Monitoring of Tank Degassing Operations Controlled by Portable Fuel Gas Combustion Devices at Petroleum Refineries. 2000007 ...... NESHAP, NSPS ...... Db, DDDDD ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Wood-Residue Fueled Boilers at a Paper- board Mill. 2000013 ...... NSPS ...... A ...... Regulatory Interpretation of the use of Part 60, Appendix F- Quality Assur- ance Procedures. FP00008 ...... Federal Plan ...... LLL ...... Modification to Alternative Monitoring Plan for Fluidized Bed Sewage Sludge Incinerator at a Wastewater Treatment Plant.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:48 Feb 19, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM 22FEN1 tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 33 / Monday, February 22, 2021 / Notices 10569

APPLICABILITY DETERMINATIONS, ALTERNATIVE MONITORING PLANS AND REGULATORY INTERPRETATIONS UPLOADED TO ADI ON OCTOBER 22, 2020—Continued

Control No. Categories Subparts Title

FP00009 ...... Federal Plan ...... LLL ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Fluidized Bed Sewage Sludge Incinerator at a Wastewater Treatment Plant. FP00010 ...... Federal Plan ...... LLL ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Fluidized Bed Sewage Sludge Incinerator at a Wastewater Treatment Plant. FP00011 ...... Federal Plan ...... LLL ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Fluidized Bed Sewage Sludge Incinerator Installed at a Wastewater Treatment Plant. FP00012 ...... Federal Plan ...... LLL ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Multiple Hearth Sewage Sludge Inciner- ators Installed at a Wastewater Treatment Plant. FP00013 ...... Federal Plan ...... LLL ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Multiple Hearth Sewage Sludge Incinerator Installed at a Wastewater Treatment Plant. M190004 ...... NESHAP, NSPS ...... F, LLL ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Parametrically Monitoring Sulfur Dioxide Emissions at a Portland Cement Plant. M190005 ...... NESHAP ...... S ...... Modification of Alternative Monitoring Plan for Steam Stripper Installed on a Kraft Pulp Mill. M190006 ...... NESHAP ...... DDDDD ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Combination Boilers at a Packaging Manu- facturing Facility. M190007 ...... NESHAP ...... MM ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Dynamic Scrubbers Installed on Smelt Dis- solving Tanks at a Kraft Pulp Mill. M190008 ...... NESHAP ...... MM ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Dynamic Scrubbers Installed on Smelt Dis- solving Tanks at a Kraft Pulp Mill. M190009 ...... NESHAP ...... MM ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Dynamic Scrubbers Installed on Smelt Dis- solving Tanks at a Kraft Pulp Mill. M190010 ...... NESHAP ...... MM ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Dynamic Scrubbers Installed on Smelt Dis- solving Tanks at a Kraft Pulp Mill. M190011 ...... NESHAP ...... MM ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Dynamic Scrubbers Installed on Smelt Dis- solving Tanks at a Kraft Pulp Mill. M190012 ...... NESHAP ...... MM ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Dynamic Scrubbers Installed on Smelt Dis- solving Tanks at a Kraft Pulp Mill. M190013 ...... NESHAP ...... MM ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Dynamic Scrubbers Installed on Smelt Dis- solving Tanks at Kraft Pulp Mill. M190014 ...... NESHAP ...... GGG ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Verifying Flow to Control System Installed on Batch-Operated Pharmaceuticals Manufacturing Facility. M190015 ...... NESHAP, NSPS ...... BB, MM ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Dynamic Scrubber Installed on Smelt Dis- solving Tanks at Kraft Pulp Mill. M190016 ...... NESHAP, NSPS ...... BB, MM ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Dynamic Scrubbers Installed on Smelt Dis- solving Tanks at Kraft Pulp Mill. M190017 ...... NESHAP ...... CC ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for a Cascading Flare System Installed at a Petroleum Refinery. M190018 ...... NESHAP ...... JJJJJJ ...... Performance Test Waiver for Carbon Monoxide for Boilers. M190019 ...... NESHAP ...... FFFF, HHHHH ...... Applicability Determination for Separation Activity at a Coatings Manufac- turing Facility. M190020 ...... NESHAP ...... EEE ...... Approval of Minor Test Method Modifications for Hazardous Waste Incin- erators. M190021 ...... NESHAP ...... RRR ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Intermittent Lime Addition to Baghouse In- stalled on Aluminum Melting Furnaces at a Secondary Aluminum Pro- duction Facility. M200001 ...... NESHAP ...... CCC ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Wet Scrubber Installed on a Steel Pickle Line at a Steel Pickling Facility. M200002 ...... NESHAP, NSPS ...... BB, BBa, MM ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Electrostatic Precipitator and Wet Scrubber Installed on a Lime Kiln at a Kraft Pulp Mill. M200003 ...... NESHAP ...... G, S ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Equipment that is Unsafe or Difficult to Monitor at a Pulp and Paper Mill. M200004 ...... NESHAP ...... UUUUU ...... Applicability Determination for Electric Utility Steam Generating Units. M200005 ...... NESHAP ...... VVVVVV, CCCCCCC .... Applicability Determination for a Lithium Ion Battery Manufacturing Facility. M200006 ...... NESHAP ...... DDDDD ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Chlorine and Mercury Monitoring for Com- bination Boiler Installed at a Pulp and Paper Mill. M200007 ...... NESHAP ...... RRR ...... Applicability Determination for Thermal Chip Dryer Installed at a Sec- ondary Aluminum Production Facility. M200008 ...... NESHAP ...... MM ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Dynamic Scrubbers Installed on Smelt Dis- solving Tanks at a Kraft Pulp Mill. M200009 ...... NESHAP ...... MM ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Dynamic Scrubbers Installed on Smelt Dis- solving Tanks at a Kraft Pulp Mill. M200015 ...... MACT ...... CC ...... Regulatory Interpretation of Petroleum Refinery Regulations for Flaring Events. Z190001 ...... NESHAP ...... ZZZZ ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combus- tion Engines Installed at Natural Gas Compressor Stations. Z200002 ...... NESHAP ...... MM ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Dynamic Scrubbers Installed on Smelt Dis- solving Tanks at a Kraft Pulp Mill. Z200003 ...... NESHAP ...... LLLLL ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Group 2 Storage Tanks at an Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing Facility.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:48 Feb 19, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM 22FEN1 tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES 10570 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 33 / Monday, February 22, 2021 / Notices

APPLICABILITY DETERMINATIONS, ALTERNATIVE MONITORING PLANS AND REGULATORY INTERPRETATIONS UPLOADED TO ADI ON OCTOBER 22, 2020—Continued

Control No. Categories Subparts Title

Z200004 ...... NESHAP ...... VVVVVV, BBBBBBB, Applicability Determination for Frit Manufacturing Facility. CCCCCCC. Z200005 ...... NESHAP ...... ZZZZ ...... Alternative Monitoring Plan for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines at a Natural Gas Plant.

Abstracts (TRS) continuous emissions monitoring approved AMP and performance test system (CEMS) for the Fluor and waiver are only for refineries located in Abstract for [1900024] Cumene flares at the Citgo Refining and EPA Region 6. EPA includes proposed Q: Does EPA determine that Mainline Chemicals Company (CITGO) Corpus operating parameter limits and data that Valve 29 (MLV 29) installed at the Christi East petroleum refinery and the the refineries must furnish as part of the Southern Natural Gas Company West Plant Process flare at the CITGO conditional approval. compressor station in Thomaston, Corpus Christi West Plant petroleum Abstract for [1900028] Georgia (TCS) is part of the affected refinery in Corpus Christi, Texas facility subject to the fugitive emission covered under NSPS subpart Ja? Q: Does EPA approve a modification monitoring requirements in NSPS A: Yes. Based on the process data and of a previously approved alternative subpart OOOOa? analyzer information submitted by monitoring plan (AMP) for Phillips 66 A: Yes. Based on the information CITGO, EPA conditionally approves the Company to revise the parametric provided, EPA determines that when request to reduce the concentration monitoring limits for the wet gas the modification to TCS occurred in ranges of the calibration gas to specified scrubbers (WGS) installed on Nos. 4 and March 2017, MLV 29 became part of the ranges and validation standards on the 5 fluidized catalytic cracking units affected facility subject to the fugitive TRS CEMS for the three flares. As (FCCU) at the Ponca City Refinery in emissions monitoring requirements of conditions of this approval, CITGO must Ponca City, Oklahoma covered by NSPS subpart OOOOa. According to 40 CFR meet all other requirements of the subpart J and NESHAP subpart UUU? 60.5397a, ’’the collection of fugitive monitoring procedures of NSPS Subpart A: Yes. Based upon the design of the emissions components at a compressor Ja for H2S and TRS, and must also WGS units and the process specific station, as defined in § 60.5430a, is an conduct linearity analyses on each supplemental information provided by affected facility,’’ and MLV 29 meets the Extrel MAX300–IGTM mass spectrometer Phillips 66 Company, EPA conditionally definition of ‘‘fugitive emissions once every three years to determine approves the AMP modification for the components’’ because it is a component each detector’s linearity across the two FCCU WGS at the Ponca City located within the fence line of a entire range of expected sulfur Refinery. EPA reviewed the recent compressor station and potentially concentrations. A report of each performance test results provided by emits fugitive emissions of methane and completed linearity analysis shall be Phillips 66 Company and found the data volatile organic compounds. submitted to EPA Region 6 and the supportive for modifying the values of Texas Commission on Environmental the established final operating Abstract for [1900025] Quality and maintained in each parameter limits (OPLs). The OPLs Q: Does EPA determine that the facility’s on-site records. approved for demonstrating compliance sweetening units and sweetening units with the AMP included minimum Abstract for [1900027] followed by a sulfur recovery unit liquid-to-gas ratio, minimum water (hereinafter referred to collectively as Q: Does EPA approve an alternative pressure to quench/spray tower, ‘‘sweetening units’’) at the Lost Cabin monitoring plan (AMP) and minimum slurry liquid circulation Gas Plant in Lysite, Wyoming are performance test waiver request for pump discharge pressure, and minimum affected facilities under NSPS subpart ProAct Services Corporation (ProAct) to pressure drop across filter modules/ LLL? conduct monitoring of hydrogen sulfide cyclolabs. A: Yes. Based on the information (H2S) emissions in lieu of installing a provided and our analysis of subpart continuous emission monitoring system, Abstract for [1900030] LLL, EPA determines that the when performing degassing for tanks, Q: Does EPA approve ExxonMobil sweetening units are affected facilities vessels, and pipes controlled by Refining and Supply Company’s under NSPS subpart LLL because portable temporary thermal oxidizers (ExxonMobil’s) waiver of the frequency subpart LLL applies to sweetening units and internal combustion engines at of particulate matter (PM) emission rate that ‘‘process natural gas,’’ and although various refineries located in EPA Region testing for one fluidized catalytic subpart LLL does not define ‘‘process 6 that are subject to NSPS subparts J and cracking unit (FCCU) at the Beaumont natural gas,’’ the preambles to the Ja? Refinery, Beaumont, Texas, which is proposed and final subpart LLL A: Yes. Based on the description of subject to NSPS subpart J and annual rulemakings (49 FR 2656, January 20, the process, the vent gas streams, the testing PM testing under consent decree, 1984 and 50 FR 40158, October 1, 1985) design of the vent gas controls, and the Civil Action No. 05–C–5809? clarify that gas processing in subpart proposed H2S monitoring and data A: Yes. EPA conditionally approves LLL refers to sweetening and sulfur collection methods furnished by ProAct ExxonMobil ’s request to reduce the recovery. Services Corporation, EPA conditionally frequency of PM testing for the one approves the AMP. In addition, based FCCU at the Beaumont Refinery from Abstract for [1900026] on ProAct’s proposed alternate testing annually to once every five years, with Q: Does EPA approve alternate span protocols used during each degassing the limitation that ExxonMobil shall gas concentration values for hydrogen event, EPA waives performance testing resume annual PM testing for the FCCU sulfide (H2S) on the total reduced sulfur pursuant to 40 CFR 60.8(b)(4). The any time the NSPS subpart J emission

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:48 Feb 19, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM 22FEN1 tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 33 / Monday, February 22, 2021 / Notices 10571

limit of 1.0 pound of PM per 1000 Abstract for [1900033] A: Yes. Since the storage tank, process pounds of coke burned (on a 3-hour Q: Does EPA approve a modification unit vessel and piping degassing average basis) is exceeded. of a previously issued alternative operations are infrequent and temporary, EPA conditionally approves Abstract for [1900031] monitoring plan (AMP) for the wet gas scrubber (WGS) on one fluidized an AMP when HydroChemPSC uses a Q: Does EPA approve a modification catalytic cracking unit (FCCU) at the portable FGCD to control emissions of a previously issued alternative Shell Chemical, LP Deer Park Refinery from these processes. EPA included in monitoring plan (AMP) for the wet gas in Deer Park, Texas (Shell Chemical, the response letter specifications scrubber (WGS) on one fluidized LP), subject to NSPS subpart J and regarding sampling procedures, catalytic cracking unit (FCCU) at the NESHAP subpart UUU, for parametric frequency of sampling, methods to determine compliance, recordkeeping, Marathon El Paso Refinery in El Paso, monitoring of opacity at the WGS in lieu and data that the refineries must furnish Texas, subject to NSPS subparts J and Ja of a continuous opacity monitoring as part of the conditional approval. and NESHAP subpart UUU, for system (COMS)? parametric monitoring of opacity at the A: Yes. Based upon the design of the Abstract for [1900036] WGS in lieu of a continuous opacity WGS unit and the process specific data Q: Does EPA approve an alternative monitoring system (COMS), due to and supplemental information provided by Shell Chemical, LP, EPA approves an monitoring plan (AMP) request from changes in operating conditions at the AMP modification to use parametric Packaging Corporation of America units when moisture levels are high in monitoring in lieu of COMS for the (PCA) to use a predictive emission the stacks? WGS on one FCCU at the Deer Park monitoring system (PEMS) in lieu of a A: Yes. Based upon the design of the Refinery. EPA reviewed the recent NOx continuous emission monitoring WGS unit and the process specific performance test results and found the system (CEMS) on Boiler B24 at the PCA supplemental information provided, data supportive for modifying the final facility in Tomahawk, Wisconsin, EPA approves the AMP modification to operating parameter limits (OPLs). The subject to NSPS subpart Db? use parametric monitoring in lieu of OPLs that EPA approves for A: No. Based on the information COMS for the WGS on one FCCU at the demonstrating compliance with the provided, EPA denies PCA’s AMP Marathon El Paso Refinery. EPA AMP included minimum Liquid-to-Gas request for use of a PEMs in lieu of a reviewed the recent performance test Ratio, minimum liquid side pressure at Nox CEMS because the heat input results and found the data supportive the filter module nozzles, and minimum capacity of Boiler B24 (352.9 MMBtu/ for modifying the final operating pressure drop at the quench nozzle. hr) significantly exceeds the 250 parameter limits (OPLs). The OPLs that Abstract for [1900034] MMBtu/hr capacity limit in 40 CFR EPA approves for demonstrating 60.49b(c) for allowing use of PEMS and compliance with the AMP included Q: Does EPA determine that an Boiler B24. Additionally, Boiler B24 minimum Liquid-to-Gas Ratio and the expansion to the Advanced Disposal may burn types of solid fuels (e.g., Services Glacier Ridge Landfill, LLC minimum pressure drop across the biomass, tire-derived fuel, paper (GRL) in Horicon, Wisconsin meets the WGS. recycling residuals, and paper pellets) applicability criteria of NSPS subpart not identified in 40 CFR 60.48b(g)(2). Abstract for [1900032] XXX, if the expansion was approved Finally, Boiler B24 was constructed in under a solid waste permit and Q: Does EPA approve an alternative 1977 and has been in operation since construction had commenced prior to that time. monitoring plan (AMP) if delayed July 17, 2014? coking unit (DCU) 843 is rerouted from A: No. EPA determines that GRL Abstract for [1900037] Flare #23 to the Merichem Flare, to landfill expansion has not triggered Q: Does EPA approve an extension of exempt Valero Port Arthur Refinery subpart XXX applicability because a the deadline from April 2, 2019 to July (Valero) in Port Arthur, Texas subject to modification as defined in under 40 31, 2019 for the initial performance test NSPS subpart J from monitoring CFR 60.761 has not occurred. GRL’s for nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions for current design capacity of 20,269,000 hydrogen sulfide (H2S) in the DCU 843 Boiler No. 4 at the Tilden Mining cubic yards was permitted by the overhead vapor stream from the Company, LLC, (Tilden) facility in disulfide oxidation tower T–6750? Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources prior to July 17, 2014 and Ishpeming, Michigan, covered by NSPS A: Yes. Based on the description of construction on that permitted subpart Db, due to force majeure events the vent gas stream, the process expansion was commenced prior to July including a series of equipment failures parameters to be monitored, the design 17, 2014, the effective date of NSPS that delayed achieving the maximum of the vent gas controls, and H2S subpart XXX. production rate? monitoring data, EPA conditionally A: No. Based on the information approves the AMP. The fuel gas stream Abstract for [1900035] provided, EPA denies the request for an from the disulfide oxidation tower T– Q: Does EPA approve the alternative extension of the performance test 6750 is inherently low in sulfur as monitoring plan (AMP) request from deadline. Based on the information demonstrated by H2S monitoring data PSC Industrial Outsourcing, LP provided, Tilden’s Boiler No. 4 achieved previously furnished to EPA for a (HydroChemPSC) to conduct monitoring maximum production rate on February previously issued AMP exempting H2S of hydrogen sulfide emissions, in lieu of 1, 2019, providing the 60-day testing monitoring for oxidation tower T–6750 installing a continuous emission period specified in 40 CFR 60.8(a). when DCU 843 was previously routed to monitoring system, when performing Because Tilden had 60 days to complete Flare #23. Valero must continue to meet degassing for storage tanks, process unit testing prior to April 2, 2019, the all other applicable NSPS requirements, vessels, and piping controlled by equipment failures do not qualify as and the DCU 843 overhead vapor stream temporary portable fuel gas combustion force majeure events, which are defined from disulfide oil oxidation tower T– devices (FGCDs) at petroleum refineries by 40 CFR 60.2 as ‘‘prevent[ing] the 6750 must be combusted in the located in EPA Region 5 that are subject owner or operator from complying with Merichem Flare. to NSPS subparts J and Ja? the regulatory requirement to conduct

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:48 Feb 19, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM 22FEN1 tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES 10572 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 33 / Monday, February 22, 2021 / Notices

performance tests within the specified affected facilities under NSPS subpart DeBusk, LLC (Debusk) to conduct timeframe.’’ OOO? monitoring of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) A: No. Based upon the design and emissions, in lieu of installing a Abstract for [1900038] operation of the vibratory feeders, EPA continuous emission monitoring system, Q: Does EPA approve an alternate determines that the feeders do not fit the when performing degassing for tanks, span gas concentration range equal to 1 definitions of any of the facilities vessels, and piping controlled by to 3 times the NSPS subpart Ja limit for subject to subpart OOO. Although the temporary portable fuel gas combustion the nitrogen oxides (NOx) continuous feeders are not affected facilities under devices (FGCDs) at petroleum refineries emission monitoring system (CEMS) for subpart OOO, the transfer points from located in Region 4 that are subject to heaters 25H–3, 25H–4, 37H–3/4/5, and the feeders onto two downstream NSPS subparts J and Ja? 30H–401 at the Flint Hills Resources conveyor belts would be subject to an A: Yes. Based on the description of Pine Bend Refinery (FHR) in Saint Paul, opacity limit in Table 3 to subpart OOO the process, the vent gas streams, the Minnesota covered under NSPS subpart for fugitive emissions sources, if the design of the vent gas controls, and the Ja? conveyors were constructed, modified, proposed H2S monitoring and data A: Yes. Based on the process data and or reconstructed after August 13, 1983. collection methods furnished by analyzer information submitted by FHR, Debusk, EPA conditionally approves the EPA conditionally approves the request Abstract for [2000003] AMP for H2S emissions from degassing to change the span gas range to 1 to 3 Q: Does EPA determine that the and cleaning of tanks, vessels, and times the NSPS Subpart Ja limit for the institutional waste incinerators operated piping. In addition, based on Debusk’s NOx CEMS for the four heaters because at four United States Air Force (USAF) proposed alternate testing protocols a lower span should provide more Long Range Radar Sites (LRRS) located used during each degassing event, EPA accurate measurement of NOx emissions in Point Barrow, Barter Island, Cold waives performance testing pursuant to from these heaters during typical Bay, and Oliktok, Alaska qualify under 40 CFR 60.8(b)(4). EPA includes in the operations. The conditions for approval 40 CFR 60.2887(h) to be excluded from response letter conditions regarding are specified in the EPA response letter. NSPS subpart EEEE? sampling procedures, re-sampling A: No. EPA determines that the USAF requirements, methods for determining Abstract for [1900039] LRRS institutional waste incinerators do compliance, FGCD operation, Q: Does EPA approve Covia Holdings not qualify for the ‘‘rural institutional recordkeeping, and reporting. Corporation’s (Covia’s) alternative waste incinerators’’ exclusion under 40 Abstract for [2000007] monitoring plan (AMP) request to CFR 60.2887(h) under subpart EEEE establish pressure drop and liquid flow because the application for exclusion Q: Does EPA approve an alternative rate parametric limits for monitoring was not submitted prior to the initial monitoring plan (AMP) to continuously particulate matter (PM) emissions from startup of the incinerators and monitor scrubber operating parameter wet scrubbers on fluidized bed dryers at information was not provided limits (OPLs) to demonstrate its two non-metallic mineral processing demonstrating that alternative disposal compliance with the opacity limit for facilities located in Ottawa, Minnesota options are unavailable or economically the No. 2 and No. 3 wood-residue fueled and Kasota, Minnesota, subject to NSPS infeasible. boilers equipped, respectively, with a subpart UUU, by using for each wet electrostatic precipitator (WESP) scrubber, the results of multiple Abstract for [2000004] and a venturi scrubber, at the WestRock performance tests conducted 2012 Q: Does EPA approve an alternative Coated Board, LLC Mahrt Mill in Phenix through the most recent performance monitoring plan (AMP) to continuously City, Alabama subject to NSPS subpart test, as opposed to using only the most monitor pressure drop and liquid flow Db? recent performance test? rate of the venturi scrubber installed on A: Yes. EPA approves the AMP as A: Yes. Based on the performance test the No. 1 bark boiler at the Foley proposed to continuously monitor the and process data submitted by Covia, as Cellulose LLC Kraft pulp mill (Foley operating load or steam generation for well as Covia’s statement that there have Mill) in Perry, Florida subject to NSPS both boilers, the total secondary electric been no modifications to any of the Subpart Db, in lieu of continuously power input of the WESP for the No. 2 processes or control devices since the monitoring opacity or particulate matter boiler, and the pressure drop and liquid earliest test, EPA conditionally approves (PM)? flow rate of the scrubber for the No. 3 the request. The conditions for the A: Yes. Based on the information boiler. EPA agrees with the technical approval are specified in the EPA provided, EPA approves the AMP. EPA concerns raised by Mahrt Mill regarding response letter and exclude use of any agrees with the technical concerns using a PM continuous emission test older than 12 years or conducted raised by Foley Mill regarding using a monitoring system or continuous prior to modifications to the dryer or PM continuous emission monitoring opacity monitoring system on biomass- scrubber, and any test that resulted in system or continuous opacity fired boilers, due to water droplets in PM emissions above ten percent of the monitoring system on biomass-fired the flue downstream of the scrubbers. emissions limit that would lower the boilers, due to water droplets in the flue The approved AMP is equivalent to the minimum pressure drop or expand the downstream of the scrubbers. The PM monitoring requirements for liquid flow rate range. Additionally, all approved AMP is equivalent to the PM biomass boilers of equivalent size future test results for the wet scrubbers monitoring requirements for a 300 subject to NESHAP subpart DDDDD, must be shared with EPA Region 5 and MMBtu/hour biomass boiler subject to and the requirements of the AMP are the Minnesota Pollution Control NESHAP subpart DDDDD, and the detailed in the EPA response letter. Agency. requirements of the AMP are detailed in Abstract for [2000013] the EPA response letter. Abstract for [2000001] Q: Does EPA agreed with the Q: Does EPA determine that two Abstract for [2000005] Oklahoma Department of Environmental vibratory feeders at the Blue Waters Q: Does EPA approve an Alternative Quality (ODEQ) that all affected sources Industries’ limestone quarry in Lebanon, Monitoring Plan (AMP) and subject to any NSPS are required to Tennessee meet the definition of performance test waiver request for USA comply with the requirements specified

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:48 Feb 19, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM 22FEN1 tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 33 / Monday, February 22, 2021 / Notices 10573

in appendix F to 40 CFR part 60, which A1: Yes. Based on the information A5: No. Based on the information is used for continuous emission provided, EPA approves the AMP for provided, EPA does not approve the monitoring systems (CEMS) in demonstrating compliance with the Hg AMP because Edmonds’ AMP does not determining compliance with emissions emission limit by monitoring and include operating procedures to address limits as specified in the NSPS General recording continuously the pressure the complete ash conveying system Provisions? drop across the Hg control system (i.e., (including conveyor transfer points) or A: No. Each subpart should be W.L. Gore and Associates, Inc./ sufficient information for EPA to reviewed for applicable references to EnviroCare International Sorbent evaluate whether daily inspections of appendix F and portions of the General Polymer Composite technology Hg the ash handling system and Provisions (GP) to 40 CFR part 60 for control system in combination with a observation of the loadout activities will affected facilities specified in the mist eliminator) and the inlet be adequate to meet the requirements of subpart. Due consideration should be temperature to the system, and by 40 CFR 62.15955 and 62.15995 on an given to the applicability sections monitoring on a quarterly basis the Hg ongoing basis. Edmonds may revise and provided within each subpart and concentrations in the flue gas at the resubmit their AMP. inlet and outlet of the system. appendix F (Quality Assurance Abstract for [FP00010] Procedures). Q2: Does EPA approve an AMP to use a wet scrubber system and to practice Q1: Does EPA approve an alternative Abstract for [FP00008] good combustion practices for monitoring plan (AMP) to demonstrate compliance with the mercury (Hg) Q: Does EPA approve a modification demonstrating compliance with the emission limit applicable to the of a previously approved alternative dioxins/furans emission limit applicable fluidized bed sewage sludge incinerator monitoring plan (AMP) for establishing to Edmonds’ SSI? A2: No. Based on the information (SSI) equipped with a W.L. Gore and operating limits (OPLs) for the sewage provided, EPA does not approve the Associates, Inc./EnviroCare sludge incinerator (SSI) using a AMP because it does not propose to International Sorbent Polymer VenturiPakTM wet scrubber with monitor any operating parameters or Composite technology Hg control mercury modules at the City of establish operating parameter limits system at the Lynnwood Wastewater Anacortes Wastewater Treatment Plant (OPLs) for Edmunds’ SSI to demonstrate Treatment Plant (Lynnwood) in (Anacortes) in Anacortes, Washington compliance with the dioxins/furans Lynnwood, Washington subject to 40 subject to 40 CFR part 62, subpart LLL? emissions limit. Edmonds should CFR part 62 subpart LLL? A: Yes. Based on the information submit a revised petition in accordance A1: Yes. Based on the information provided, EPA conditionally approves with 40 CFR 62.15965(b)(2)(i) through provided, EPA approves the AMP for the AMP modification. EPA agrees with (v) that addresses dioxins/furans- demonstrating compliance with the Hg establishing the sand bed temperature of specific operating parameters and OPLs emission limit by monitoring and the SSI as the operating parameter for associated with good combustion recording continuously the pressure monitoring dioxins/furans in lieu of the practices. drop across the Hg control system and exhaust gas temperature, and Anacortes Q3: Does EPA approve Edmonds’ the inlet temperature to the system, and must limit the maximum dry sludge AMP for its VenturiPakTM scrubber by monitoring on a quarterly basis the feed rate to no greater than 110 percent system to demonstrate compliance with Hg concentrations in the flue gas at the of the average dry sludge feed rate the three OPLs for scrubbers in table 4 inlet and outlet of the system. achieved during the most recent to subpart LLL, by monitoring the OPLs Q2: Does EPA approve an AMP to use performance test demonstrating only at the drain that receives the total a wet scrubber system and to practice compliance with the dioxins/furans scrubber water discharge from the good combustion practices for emission limits. EPA agrees with scrubber system? demonstrating compliance with the replacing the 12-hour block averaging A3: No. EPA does not approve the dioxins/furans emission limit applicable time for OPLs specified in table 4 to AMP because Edmunds did not provide to Lynnwood’s SSI? subpart LLL with an ‘‘operating day the information specified by 40 CFR A2: No. Based on the information block average’’ averaging time because 62.15995(e)(1) through (6). Edmunds’ provided, EPA does not approve the Anacortes typically operates only 6 to 8 scrubber system generally consists of AMP because it does not propose to hours per day. EPA also agrees that the five different scrubbers operated in monitor any operating parameters or reduced performance testing frequency series, and the Federal Plan requires establish operating parameter limits provided in 40 CFR 62.16000(a)(3) monitoring pressure drop, liquid flow (OPLs) for Lynnwood’s SSI to should apply to Anacortes. The rate, and pH of each wet scrubber in a demonstrate compliance with the approved operating parameters and scrubber system. Edmonds may revise dioxins/furans emissions limit. conditions for establishing OPLs are and resubmit their AMP. Lynnwood should submit a revised specified in the EPA approval letter. Q4: Does EPA approve Edmonds’ petition in accordance with 40 CFR Abstract for [FP00009] AMP changing the location for 62.15965(b)(2)(i) through (v) that monitoring the minimum combustion addresses dioxins/furans-specific Q1: Does EPA approve an alternative chamber operating temperature of the operating parameters and OPLs monitoring plan (AMP) for establishing SSI from the exhaust gas to the fluidized associated with good combustion and monitoring operating parameters to sand bed? practices. demonstrate compliance with the A4: Yes. Based on the information Q3: Does EPA approve Lynnwood’s mercury (Hg) emission limit applicable provided, EPA approves the AMP since AMP for its wet scrubber system to to the fluidized bed sewage sludge the alternative location will enable demonstrate compliance with the OPLs incinerator (SSI) equipped with a accurate and representative for scrubbers in table 4 to subpart LLL control equipment not specified in 40 measurements. by monitoring the pressure drop across CFR 62.15965 at the Edmonds Q5: Does EPA approve Edmonds’ the venturi scrubber, the total scrubber Wastewater Treatment Plant (Edmonds) AMP specifying the facility’s ash water flow rates not including the mist in Edmonds, Washington subject to 40 handling system monitoring eliminator, and the pH of the scrubber CFR part 62 subpart LLL? procedures? discharge from the impingement tray

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:48 Feb 19, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM 22FEN1 tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES 10574 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 33 / Monday, February 22, 2021 / Notices

scrubber and associated tray irrigation monitoring and recording continuously operating procedures to address the water flow? the inlet temperature to the Hg control complete ash conveying system or A3: No. EPA does not approve the system and monitoring on a quarterly sufficient information for EPA to AMP because Lynnwood did not basis the Hg concentrations in the flue evaluate whether daily observations of provide the information specified by 40 gas at the inlet and outlet of the system. the ash filter cake to the roll-off bins and CFR 62.15995(e)(1) through (6). Vancouver should submit a revised the weekly sampling of the moisture Lynnwood’s scrubber system generally petition proposing Hg-specific OPLs content of the ash filter cake will be consists of five different scrubbers that meet the requirements of 40 CFR adequate to meet the requirements of 40 operated in series, and the Federal Plan 62.15965(b)(2)(iii), and Vancouver CFR 62.15955 and 62.15995 on an requires monitoring pressure drop, should consider whether the pressure ongoing basis. Vancouver may revise liquid flow rate, and pH of each wet drop across the Hg control system and resubmit their AMP. scrubber in a scrubber system. should be included as an OPL. Lynnwood may revise and resubmit Q2: Does EPA approve an AMP to use Abstract for [FP00012] their AMP. a wet scrubber system and to practice Q1: Does EPA approve an alternative Q4: Does EPA approve Lynnwood’s good combustion practices for monitoring plan (AMP) to demonstrate AMP for monitoring the minimum demonstrating compliance with the compliance with the mercury (Hg) combustion chamber operating dioxins/furans emission limit applicable emission limit applicable to two temperature of the SSI using the average to Vancouver’s SSI? multiple hearth sewage sludge reading of three thermocouples that A2: No. Based on the information incinerators (SSIs) equipped with a wet measure the combustion temperature provided, EPA does not approve the venturi scrubber and wet electrostatic within the fluidized sand bed of the AMP because it does not propose to precipitator (WESP) at the Bellingham SSI? monitor any operating parameters or Wastewater Treatment Plant A4: Yes. Based on the information establish OPLs for Vancouver’s SSI to (Bellingham) in Bellingham, provided, EPA approves the AMP for demonstrate compliance with the Washington subject to 40 CFR part 62 the SSI because it meets the 40 CFR dioxins/furans emissions limit. subpart LLL? 62.15960 requirements. Vancouver should submit a revised A1: No. Based on the information Q5: Does EPA approve Lynnwood’s petition in accordance with 40 CFR provided, EPA does not approve the AMP specifying the facility’s ash 62.15965(b)(2)(i) through (v) to propose AMP because it proposes no monitoring handling system monitoring dioxins/furans OPLs associated with of Hg-specific operating parameter procedures? good combustion practices. limits (OPLs) and provides no A5: No. Based on the information Q3: Does EPA approve Vancouver’s information on the influence of the wet provided, EPA does not approve the AMP for its quench/venturi wet scrubber and WESP on Hg emissions. AMP because Lynnwood’s AMP does scrubber system to demonstrate Bellingham should submit a revised not include operating procedures to compliance with the OPLs for scrubbers petition proposing Hg-specific OPLs address the complete ash conveying in table 4 to subpart LLL by monitoring that adequately address 40 CFR system (including conveyor transfer the pressure drop across the tray 62.15965(b)(2)(i) through (v). points) or sufficient information for EPA scrubber, the total scrubber water flow Q2: Does EPA approve an AMP to use to evaluate whether daily observations rate from the quench, venturi, and tray an afterburner (thermal oxidizer), wet of the filter cake and observation of the scrubbers, and the pH of the tray scrubber, WESP, and good combustion loadout activities will be adequate to scrubber effluent? practices to comply with the dioxins/ meet the requirements of 40 CFR A3: No. EPA does not approve the furans emission limit applicable to 62.15955 and 62.15995 on an ongoing AMP because Vancouver did not Bellingham’s SSIs? basis. Lynnwood may revise and provide the information specified by 40 A2: No. Based on the information resubmit their AMP. CFR 62.15995(e)(1) through (6). provided, EPA does not approve the AMP because it does not propose to Abstract for [FP00011] Vancouver’s scrubber system consists of multiple scrubbers operated in series, monitor any OPLs to demonstrate Q1: Does EPA approve an alternative and subpart LLL requires monitoring compliance with the dioxins/furans monitoring plan (AMP) to demonstrate pressure drop, liquid flow rate, and pH emission limit, and it does not provide compliance with the mercury (Hg) of each wet scrubber in a scrubber any information on the afterburner’s emission limit applicable to the system. Vancouver may revise and influence on dioxins/furans emissions. fluidized bed sewage sludge incinerator resubmit their AMP. Bellingham should submit a revised (SSI) equipped with a W.L. Gore and Q4: Does EPA approve Vancouver’s petition to adequately address 40 CFR Associates, Inc./EnviroCare AMP for monitoring the minimum 62.15965(b)(2)(i) through (v), including International Sorbent Polymer combustion chamber operating proposing dioxins/furans-specific OPLs Composite technology Hg control temperature of the SSI using the average associated with good combustion system in combination with a mist reading of three thermocouples that practices. eliminator at the Vancouver Wastewater measure the combustion temperature Q3: Does EPA approve Bellingham’s Treatment Plant (Vancouver) in within the fluidized sand bed of the AMP for its WESPs to demonstrate Vancouver, Washington subject to 40 SSI? compliance with the OPLs for scrubbers CFR part 62 subpart LLL? A4: Yes. Based on the information in table 4 to subpart LLL by monitoring A1: No. Based on the information provided, EPA approves the AMP for the secondary voltage, amperage, and provided, EPA does not approve the SSI because it meets the 40 CFR hourly inlet water flow to the WESP? Vancouver’s AMP to monitor the Hg 62.15960 requirements. A3: No. EPA does not approve concentrations collected on the sorption Q5: Does EPA approve Vancouver’s monitoring hourly inlet water flow to media modules within the Hg control AMP for the facility’s ash handling the WESP in lieu of hourly outlet water system because Vancouver was unable system monitoring procedures? flow from the WESP because to establish an operating parameter limit A5: No. Based on the information Bellingham did not provide the (OPL) and averaging time for this provided, EPA does not approve the information specified by 40 CFR operating parameter. EPA approves AMP because it does not include 62.15995(e)(1) through (6). EPA

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:48 Feb 19, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM 22FEN1 tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 33 / Monday, February 22, 2021 / Notices 10575

approves monitoring of the secondary Anchorage, Washington subject to 40 submit a revised petition regarding Hg- voltage and amperage of the WESPs. CFR part 62 subpart LLL? specific OPLs that adequately addresses Q4: Does EPA approve Bellingham’s A1: No. EPA does not approve the 40 CFR 62.15965(b)(2)(i) through (v). AMP for its wet scrubber systems, to AMP to monitor the combined pressure Q5: Does EPA approve Anchorage’s demonstrate compliance with the OPLs drop across the impingement tray AMP to demonstrate compliance with for scrubbers in table 4 to subpart LLL scrubber, venturi scrubber, separator the dioxins/furans emission limit using by monitoring the combined pressure tray scrubber, and mist eliminator; the good combustion practices and a series drop across the venturi and tray wet combined liquid flow rate of all the of wet scrubbers, but without the use of scrubbers, the total scrubber water flow scrubbers, and the combined pH of all dioxins/furans-specific controls? rate to both venturi and tray wet scrubber liquid effluent. Anchorage’s A5: No. EPA does not approve the scrubbers, and the pH of the tray scrubber systems consist of multiple AMP because it does not propose to scrubber influent? scrubbers operated in series, and monitor dioxins/furans-specific OPLs A4: No. EPA does not approve the subpart LLL requires monitoring for its SSI to demonstrate compliance AMP because Bellingham did not pressure drop, liquid flow rate, and pH with the dioxins/furans emission limit, provide the information specified by 40 of each wet scrubber in a scrubber or to provide any information on the CFR 62.15995(e)(1) through (6). system; however, the AMP did not control of dioxins/furans from the SSI, Bellingham’s scrubber systems consist provide the information specified by 40 such as the extent to which it relies on of multiple scrubbers operated in series, CFR 62.15995(e)(1) through (6). maintaining the temperature in the and subpart LLL requires parameter Anchorage may revise and resubmit combustion zone above a certain level to monitoring of each wet scrubber in a their AMP. comply with the dioxins/furans scrubber system. Q2: Does EPA approve Anchorage’s emission limit. Anchorage should Q5: Does EPA approve Bellingham’s AMP for monitoring the minimum submit a revised petition to propose AMP for monitoring the minimum temperature of the afterburner dioxins/furans OPLs associated with temperature of the afterburner combustion chamber of the SSIs using good combustion practices that combustion chamber of the SSIs using a three temperature sensors in the adequately addresses 40 CFR temperature sensor located near the exit afterburner combustion chamber? 62.15965(b)(2)(i) through (v). from the afterburner chamber upstream A2: No. Based on the information Abstract for [M190004] of the entry of the venturi scrubber? provided, EPA does not approve the A5: No. Based on the information AMP because the AMP does not address Q. Does EPA approve an alternative provided, EPA does not approve the how the temperature sensors are monitoring plan to change the sulfur AMP because EPA needs more representative of control of the SSI dioxide (SO2) operating limit to 300 information regarding the design and exhaust emissions as specified in 40 ppm and monitor stack emissions with performance specifications of the CFR 62.15995(a)(1) or how the sensor an SO2 continuous emissions afterburner and supplemental burner to locations are representative as specified monitoring system (CEMS) that has a determine whether the temperature in 40 CFR 62.15995(a)(3)(ii)(D)(1). range of 0–300 ppm and a span of 0–200 sensor provides a representative Anchorage must resubmit a revised ppm at Holcim (US) Inc.’s Portland temperature of the afterburner AMP that addresses all requirements in cement plant (Portland Plant) in combustion chamber. 40 CFR 62.15995(a)(1) through (8). Florence, Colorado subject to NESHAP Q6: Does EPA approve Bellingham’s Q3: Does EPA approve Anchorage’s subpart LLL? AMP for the facility’s ash handling AMP for the facility’s ash handling A: Yes. Based on the process system monitoring procedures? system monitoring procedures? information and test data submitted by A6: No. Based on the information A3: No. EPA does not approve the Portland Plant, EPA conditionally provided, EPA does not approve the AMP because it does not provide approves an SO2 operating limit of 300 AMP. The AMP must be revised to sufficient detail to determine whether ppm, which is more stringent than the include the upstream portion of the ash the ash handling system operating 369 ppm SO2 operating level handling system during Method 22 procedures meet the requirements of 40 determined by Portland Plant’s 2018 testing and to explain how Bellingham CFR 62.15955 and 62.15995 or whether hydrogen chloride (HCl) compliance will properly conduct the Method 22 the visible emission limit is met on an test, and using an SO2 CEMS with a test during ash filling. Further, the AMP ongoing basis. Further, the AMP does range of 0–300 ppm and a span of 0–200 must provide information for EPA to not clearly indicate whether all ppm. If future HCl performance testing evaluate if the ash handling units used components of the ash handling system indicates the SO2 operating parameter to capture and control fugitive ash are included in the operating limit should be less than 300 ppm, emissions, equipment inspections, procedures and whether the Method 22 Portland Plant must establish a lower visible fugitive ash emission checks, compliance testing will be performed on SO2 operating parameter limit, and the and monitoring of the fabric filter the entire ash handling system. SO2 operating limit must be set, and pressure drop and water usage in the Q4: Does EPA approve Anchorage’s later monitored, in the same units ash handling system will meet on an AMP for to demonstrate compliance (PPMVD or PPMV). Further, should SO2 ongoing basis the requirements of 40 with the mercury (Hg) emission limit levels increase above the 30-day rolling CFR 62.15955 and 62.15995. without the use of Hg-specific controls? average SO2 operating limit by 10 A4: No. EPA does not approve the percent or more, then Portland Plant Abstract for [FP00013] AMP. Anchorage’s AMP does not must undertake the actions required by Q1: Does EPA approve an alternative propose any Hg-specific OPLs or 40 CFR 63.1349(b)(8)(x)(A) and (B) and monitoring plan (AMP) to demonstrate provide any information on how it 40 CFR 63.1350(l)(3)(i) and (ii). compliance with the operating controls Hg emissions from the SSI, parameter limits (OPLs) for the including the extent to which Abstract for [M190005] VenturiPakTM scrubber system for the Anchorage relies on maintaining the Hg Q: Does EPA approve a modification multiple hearth sewage sludge concentration in the dry sludge feed of a previously approved Alternative incinerator (SSI) at the Anchorage Water below a certain level to comply with the Monitoring Plan (AMP) for Foley & Wastewater Utility (Anchorage) in Hg emission limit. Anchorage should Cellulose LLC (Foley Mill) to revise the

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:48 Feb 19, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM 22FEN1 tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES 10576 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 33 / Monday, February 22, 2021 / Notices

location for methanol flow rate and between the no-load amperage value constant speed fan are a function of density monitoring for measuring steam and the lowest of the 1-hour average fan atmospheric conditions, rather than of stripper treatment of pulping amperage values determined during scrubber performance; therefore, setting condensates at the Foley Mill in Perry, compliance testing? the fan amperage limit at the lowest Florida covered by NESHAP subpart S? A: Yes. Based on the information one-hour average fan amperage value A: Yes. Based upon flow rate and provided, EPA conditionally approves based on compliance testing in density monitoring data provided by the AMP for Prattville Mill. EPA agrees accordance with 40 CFR Foley Mill, and supplemental that fluctuations in amperage for a 63.864(j)(5)(i)(A) could cause reporting information provided by Foley Mill constant speed fan are a function of of deviations that do not represent regarding the size of the methanol atmospheric conditions, rather than of exceedances of the applicable emission storage tank and average amount of scrubber performance; therefore, setting limits. The AMP conditions applicable methanol burned on a normal the fan amperage limit at the lowest to each of Riverdale Mill’s scrubbers are production day, EPA approves the AMP one-hour average fan amperage value specified in the EPA response letter. modification for revising the location for based on compliance testing in methanol flow rate and density accordance with 40 CFR Abstract for [M190010] monitoring. The monitoring location 63.864(j)(5)(i)(A) could cause reporting Q: Does EPA approve an alternative would move from the current of deviations that do not represent monitoring plan (AMP) to establish the monitoring location for methanol flow exceedances of the applicable emission fan amperage operating limits for the rate and density where the rectified limits. The AMP conditions applicable Ducon scrubbers installed on the smelt methanol stream enters the methanol to each of Prattville Mill’s scrubbers are dissolving tanks subject to NESHAP storage tank to the outlet of the specified in the EPA response letter. subpart MM at International Paper’s methanol storage tank for monitoring Kraft pulp mill in Redwood, Mississippi Abstract for [M190008] density and to the inlet of the methanol (Vicksburg Mill) as the midpoint burners in the No. 2 and No. 4 recovery Q: Does EPA approve an alternative between the no-load amperage value furnaces for monitoring flow rate. monitoring plan (AMP) to establish the and the lowest of the 1-hour average fan Because the average residence time for fan amperage operating limits for the amperage values determined during the tank contents is just under 8 days Ducon scrubbers installed on the smelt compliance testing? and the averaging period for dissolving tanks subject to NESHAP A: Yes. Based on the information determining compliance is based on a subpart MM at International Paper’s provided, EPA conditionally approves 15-day rolling average, EPA considers Kraft pulp mill (Savannah Mill) as the the AMP for Vicksburg Mill. EPA agrees this method adequate for measuring the midpoint between the no-load amperage that fluctuations in amperage for a density and flow of the rectified value and the lowest of the 1-hour constant speed fan are a function of methanol stream. average fan amperage values determined atmospheric conditions, rather than of during compliance testing? scrubber performance; therefore, setting Abstract for [M190006] A: Yes. Based on the information the fan amperage limit at the lowest Q: Does EPA approve an alternative provided, EPA conditionally approves one-hour average fan amperage value monitoring plan (AMP) request from the AMP for Savannah Mill. EPA agrees based on compliance testing in Packaging Corporation of America that fluctuations in amperage for a accordance with 40 CFR (PCA), for periods when the wet constant speed fan are a function of 63.864(j)(5)(i)(A) could cause reporting scrubber is not engaged due to atmospheric conditions, rather than of of deviations that do not represent maintenance activities, to monitor on an scrubber performance; therefore, setting exceedances of the applicable emission hourly basis the natural gas and bark the fan amperage limit at the lowest limits. The AMP conditions applicable feed rates to the Riley Combination one-hour average fan amperage value to each of Vicksburg Mill’s scrubbers are Boiler and the Combustion Engineering based on compliance testing in specified in the EPA response letter. Combination Boiler at PCA’s facility in accordance with 40 CFR Abstract for [M190011] Valdosta, Georgia subject to NESHAP 63.864(j)(5)(i)(A) could cause reporting subpart DDDDD, in lieu of monitoring of deviations that do not represent Q: Does EPA approve an alternative wet scrubber flow rate, pressure drop, exceedances of the applicable emission monitoring plan (AMP) to establish the and pH? limits. The AMP conditions applicable fan amperage operating limits for the A: Yes. EPA conditionally approves to each of Savannah Mill’s scrubbers are Ducon scrubbers installed on the smelt the AMP for periods when only natural addressed in the EPA response letter. dissolving tanks subject to NESHAP gas is fired in the boilers, provided that subpart MM at International Paper’s PCA demonstrates through existing data Abstract for [M190009] Kraft pulp mill in Eastover, South or emissions testing that the two boilers Q: Does EPA approve an alternative Carolina (Eastover Mill) as the midpoint comply with the applicable particulate monitoring plan (AMP) to establish the between the no-load amperage value matter, mercury,and hydrogen chloride fan amperage operating limits for the and the lowest of the 1-hour average fan emission standards in NESHAP subpart Ducon scrubbers installed on the smelt amperage values determined during DDDDD when the wet scrubber is not dissolving tanks subject to NESHAP compliance testing, for IP’s Eastover engaged. subpart MM at International Paper’s Mill? Kraft pulp mill in Selma, Alabama A: Yes. Based on the information Abstract for [M190007] (Riverdale Mill) as the midpoint provided, EPA conditionally approves Q: Does EPA approve an alternative between the no-load amperage value the AMP for Eastover Mill. EPA agrees monitoring plan (AMP) to establish the and the lowest of the 1-hour average fan that fluctuations in amperage for a fan amperage operating limits for the amperage values determined during constant speed fan are a function of Ducon scrubbers installed on the smelt compliance testing? atmospheric conditions, rather than of dissolving tanks subject to NESHAP A: Yes. Based on the information scrubber performance; therefore, setting subpart MM at International Paper’s provided, EPA conditionally approves the fan amperage limit at the lowest Kraft pulp mill in Prattville, Alabama the AMP for Riverdale Mill. EPA agrees one-hour average fan amperage value (Prattville Mill) as the midpoint that fluctuations in amperage for a based on compliance testing in

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:48 Feb 19, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM 22FEN1 tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 33 / Monday, February 22, 2021 / Notices 10577

accordance with 40 CFR Abstract for [M190014] Q2: Does EPA also approve the AMP 63.864(j)(5)(i)(A) could cause reporting at Columbus Mill as an alternative to of deviations that do not represent Q: Does EPA approve an alternative monitoring the pressure differential of exceedances of the applicable emission monitoring plan (AMP) to identify the gas stream through the Ducon limits. The AMP conditions applicable periods of no flow to the regenerative scrubbers installed on the smelt to each of Eastover Mill’s scrubbers are thermal oxidizer and packed-bed dissolving tanks which are also subject specified in the EPA response letter. scrubber by using process data regarding to NSPS subpart BB? the end and start of batch production A2: Yes. Based on the information Abstract for [M190012] runs in lieu of monitoring flow at the provided, EPA approves the AMP in Q: Does EPA approve an alternative inlet or outlet of this control system lieu of monitoring differential pressure monitoring plan (AMP) to establish the installed on UPM Pharmaceuticals, Inc. monitoring required in 40 CFR fan amperage operating limits for the (UPM’s) batch-operated pharmaceuticals 60.282(b)(2)(i). Based on the operation Ducon scrubbers installed on the smelt manufacturing facility in Bristol, of the Ducon scrubbers, fan amps are an dissolving tanks subject to NESHAP Tennessee subject to NESHAP subpart appropriate alternative to pressure subpart MM at International Paper’s GGG? differential. The other requirements of Kraft pulp mill in Georgetown, South A: Yes. Based on the information subpart BB continue to apply. Carolina (Georgetown Mill) as the provided, EPA approves UPM’s AMP for Abstract for [M190016] midpoint between the no-load amperage determining periods of no flow of value and the lowest of the 1-hour emissions to the control system for the Q1: Does EPA approve an alternative average fan amperage values determined batch operation, for the purpose of monitoring plan (AMP) to establish the during compliance testing? removing periods of no flow when fan amperage operating limits for the A: Yes. Based on the information calculating daily average values of Ducon UW–4 scrubbers installed on the provided, EPA conditionally approves operating parameter averages for the smelt dissolving tanks subject to the AMP for Georgetown Mill. EPA control system. Because of the ductwork NESHAP subpart MM at International agrees that fluctuations in amperage for configuration at the facility, both Paper’s Kraft pulp mill in Riegelwood, a constant speed fan are a function of process air and room air are collected North Carolina (Riegelwood Mill) as the atmospheric conditions, rather than of and sent to the control system for midpoint between the no-load amperage scrubber performance; therefore, setting reducing hazardous air pollutant (HAP) value and the lowest of the 1-hour the fan amperage limit at the lowest emissions; therefore, the air flow data at average fan amperage values determined one-hour average fan amperage value the inlet or outlet of the control system during compliance testing? based on compliance testing in is not a reliable indicator of periods A1: Yes. Based on the information accordance with 40 CFR when there are no HAP emissions. EPA provided, EPA conditionally approves 63.864(j)(5)(i)(A) could cause reporting agrees with UPM’s rationale for starting the AMP for Riegelwood Mill. EPA of deviations that do not represent each period of no flow 15 minutes after agrees that fluctuations in fan amperage exceedances of the applicable emission the end of a batch, and UPM’s plan to for a constant speed fan are a function limits. The AMP conditions applicable end each period of no flow when the of atmospheric conditions, rather than to each of Georgetown Mill’s scrubbers next batch begins. of scrubber performance; therefore, are specified in the EPA response letter. setting the fan amperage limit at the Abstract for [M190015] Abstract for [M190013] lowest 1-hour average fan amperage value based on compliance testing in Q: Does EPA approve an alternative Q1: Does EPA approve an alternative monitoring plan (AMP) to establish the accordance with 40 CFR monitoring plan (AMP) to establish the 63.864(j)(5)(i)(A) could cause reporting fan amperage operating limits for the fan amperage operating limits for the Ducon scrubbers installed on the smelt of deviations that do not represent Ducon scrubbers installed on the smelt exceedances of the applicable emission dissolving tanks subject to NESHAP dissolving tanks subject to NESHAP subpart MM at International Paper’s limits. The AMP conditions applicable subpart MM at International Paper’s to each of Riegelwood Mill’s scrubbers Kraft pulp mill in Franklin, Virginia Kraft pulp mill in Columbus, Georgia (Columbus Mill) as the midpoint are specified in the EPA response letter. (Franklin Mill) as the midpoint between Q2: Does EPA also approve the AMP between the no-load amperage value the no-load amperage value and the at Riegelwood Mill as an alternative to and the lowest of the 1-hour average fan lowest of the 1-hour average fan monitoring the pressure differential of amperage values determined during amperage values determined during the gas stream through the Ducon compliance testing? compliance testing? scrubbers installed on the smelt A: Yes. Based on the information A1: Yes. Based on the information dissolving tanks, which are also subject provided, EPA conditionally approves provided, EPA conditionally approves to NSPS subpart BB? the AMP for Franklin Mill. EPA agrees the AMP for Columbus Mill. EPA agrees A2: Yes. Based on the information that fluctuations in fan amperage for a that fluctuations in fan amperage for a provided, EPA approves the AMP in constant speed fan are a function of constant speed fan are a function of lieu of monitoring differential pressure atmospheric conditions, rather than of atmospheric conditions, rather than of monitoring required in 40 CFR scrubber performance; therefore, setting scrubber performance; therefore, setting 60.282(b)(2)(i). Based on the operation the fan amperage limit at the lowest 1- the fan amperage limit at the lowest 1- of the Ducon scrubbers, fan amps are an hour average fan amperage value based hour average fan amperage value based appropriate alternative to pressure on compliance testing in accordance on compliance testing in accordance differential. The other requirements of with 40 CFR 63.864(j)(5)(i)(A) could with 40 CFR 63.864(j)(5)(i)(A) could subpart BB continue to apply. cause reporting of deviations that do not cause reporting of deviations that do not represent exceedances of the applicable represent exceedances of the applicable Abstract for [M190017] emission limits. The AMP conditions emission limits. The AMP conditions Q: Does EPA approve an alternative applicable to each of Franklin Mill’s applicable to each of Columbus Mill’s monitoring plan (AMP) to determine scrubbers are specified in the EPA scrubbers are specified in the EPA compliance with net heating value response letter. response letter. requirements of a cascading flare system

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:48 Feb 19, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM 22FEN1 tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES 10578 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 33 / Monday, February 22, 2021 / Notices

at CITGO Petroleum Corporation’s Lake epoxy dispersion process, EPA because HAI did not provide Charles Manufacturing Complex (CITGO determines that the specific epoxy assurances, through data and LCMC) in Lake Charles, Louisiana dispersion process that Dow plans for information, that the proposed subject to NESHAP subpart CC, to its Midland, Michigan facility is not intermittent lime addition monitoring monitor the net heating value of the considered a ‘‘separation activity’’ procedure is adequate to ensure that all primary flare in lieu of monitoring the under subpart HHHHH, therefore relevant emissions standards will be net heating value of secondary flare B– subpart HHHHH would potentially met on a continuous basis. Additionally, 107? apply to Dow’s planned epoxy the emissions testing data that is A: Yes. Based on the information dispersion process, and NESHAP available to the Agency is insufficient to provided, EPA approves the AMP since subpart FFFF would not apply. If Dow support the proposed alternative. monitoring the net heating value (NHV) uses HAP-containing materials in the Abstract for [M200001] at the primary flare will be comparable process, or uses HAP-containing to monitoring the NHV at the secondary cleaning solvents, the requirements of Q: Does EPA approve the alternative flare because the two flares are Subpart HHHHH would apply to the monitoring plan (AMP) request from connected to a single flare gas header epoxy dispersion process. Nucor Steel Gallatin (Nucor) for the wet system such that discharges will be Q2: What is meant by ‘‘separation scrubber that controls hydrochloric acid directed first to the primary flare. In activity’’ in subpart HHHHH? emissions from a steel pickling line at addition, CITGO LCMC has elected to A2: EPA is unable to answer Dow’s the Nucor’s facility in Ghent, Kentucky directly monitor the net heating value of broad question in this response subject to NESHAP subpart CCC, the primary flare’s vent gas following regarding what is meant by ‘‘separation because water is not provided at a the methods provided in 40 CFR activity’’ in subpart HHHHH. continuous rate to this ‘‘water-efficient’’ 63.670(j)(3). scrubber? Abstract for [M190020] A: Yes. EPA conditionally approves Abstract for [M190018] Q1: Does EPA approve test method Nucor’s AMP for the scrubber because Q: Does EPA approve a waiver of the modifications for EPA Reference conductivity is determined to be an requirement to conduct triennial carbon Methods 5, 26A, and 29 of 40 CFR part acceptable indicator for acid strength in monoxide (CO) performance tests under 60, appendix A to use a Teflon® transfer a wet scrubber. Because temperature NESHAP subpart JJJJJJ due to the line between the filter and the first fluctuations can interfere with accurate permanent cessation of coal use, for 18 impinger of the sampling train during conductivity measurement, Nucor must boilers at nine facilities owned by comprehensive performance tests coordinate with the Kentucky Wisconsin Department of conducted using the three reference Department of Air Quality to ensure that Administration (DOA) in Wisconsin methods on Veolia ES Technical the accuracy of conductivity subject to NESHAP subpart JJJJJJ? Solutions, LLC’s (Veolia’s) three measurements can be assured if there A: Yes. Based on the information hazardous waste incinerators (Unit #2, are any temperature variations and, if provided, the applicable regulations, Unit #3, and Unit #4) in Illinois covered needed, additional assurance and pursuant to 40 CFR 63.7(h), EPA under NESHAP subpart EEE? requirements to account for temperature conditionally approves the performance A1: Yes. EPA conditionally approves fluctuations be included in Nucor’s testing waiver for each of the 18 boilers Veolia’s test method modifications for permit. identified in the EPA response letter. EPA Reference Methods 5, 26A, and 29, Abstract for [M200002] For each boiler that no longer fires coal, provided that Veolia takes certain DOA must continue to monitor the precautions to preserve the samples’ Q1: Does EPA approve an alternative excess oxygen level in the flue gas, and integrity as specified in the EPA monitoring plan (AMP) for International if the 30-day rolling average oxygen response letter. Paper (IP) to conduct monitoring of level is below the minimum oxygen Q2: Does EPA continue to approve opacity using a continuous opacity level determined from the performance Veolia’s use of the fifteen test method monitoring system (COMS) at a point in tests conducted in 2017, DOA must modifications previously approved by between the electrostatic precipitator report the exceedance to EPA. If DOA EPA on November 16, 2009 and June 15, (ESP) and wet scrubber in lieu of combusts coal in any of the boilers after 2011? continuous parameter monitoring of the April 30, 2020, then DOA must conduct A2: Yes. Because these test methods differential pressure, liquid flow rate, the CO performance test required by were previously approved by EPA, the and scrubbing liquid supply pressure, subpart JJJJ within 30 days and methods may be used at Veolia’s for the wet scrubber installed to control thereafter as required by subpart JJJJJJ. hazardous waste incinerators without particulate matter (PM) emissions for any further action from EPA. Lime Kiln No. 4 at IP’s Riegelwood Mill Abstract for [M190019] in Riegelwood, North Carolina that is Q1: Does EPA determine that the final Abstract for [M190021] subject to NESHAP subpart MM and filtering step of a coating product to Q: Does EPA approve an alternative NSPS subpart BB, because the wet remove lumps/gels from the final monitoring plan (AMP) for monitoring scrubber is not used to control product (epoxy dispersion process), intermittent lime addition to Baghouse emissions of PM? which The Dow Chemical Company #1 installed on two Group 1 A1: Yes. Based on the description of (Dow) is planning to start up at its reverberatory aluminum melting the process, the vent gas streams, the facility in Midland, Michigan, meets the furnaces (RMF #1 and RMF #2) in lieu design of the vent gas controls, and the definition of ‘‘separation activity’’ in of using a pulse jet fabric filter with proposed opacity monitoring furnished NESHAP subpart HHHHH, such that continuous lime injection at Huntington by IP, EPA conditionally approves the NESHAP subpart HHHHH would not Aluminum Incorporated’s (HAI’s) AMP. Since the wet scrubber is not apply and the epoxy dispersion process facility in Huntington, Indiana covered serving as a PM control device and would potentially be subject to NESHAP under NESHAP subpart RRR? compliance is demonstrated before the subpart FFFF? A: No. Based on the information wet scrubber, it is not necessary to A1: No. Based on the information provided, EPA denies HAI’s request for monitor the PM operating parameters provided by Dow regarding the planned an AMP for intermittent lime injection for the wet scrubber per NESHAP

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:48 Feb 19, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM 22FEN1 tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 33 / Monday, February 22, 2021 / Notices 10579

subpart MM and NSPS subpart BB. IP to-inspect periods, as described in 40 the performance test according to 40 must maintain proper operation of the CFR 63.148(i)(1) and (2). CFR 63.7540(a)(2), EPA approves the ESP automatic voltage controller per the AMP for New-Indy’s No. 2 Combination Abstract for [M200004] requirements of NESHAP subpart MM, Boiler only. The proposed calculations perform compliance testing after the Q: Does EPA determine that operation will conservatively represent the highest ESP and prior to the wet scrubber, and of boilers SR4 and SR6 at the GSP input amounts of Cl and Hg during the continue to conduct PM testing per the Schiller LLC Station in Portsmouth, compliance testing while firing bark, requirements of NESHAP subpart MM New Hampshire (GSP) to produce TDF. and No. 6 fuel oil because they and NSPS subpart BB. auxiliary steam (i.e., not producing account for the emissions resulting from Q2: Does EPA also approve under this electricity) qualifies as a startup the combustion of No. 6 fuel oil without AMP an alternative to the excess operation under NESHAP subpart providing credit for the heat input emissions criteria of NSPS Subpart BB, UUUUU? associated with No. 6 fuel oil. A: No. EPA determines that units SR4 whereby excess emissions occur when Abstract for [M200007] the 6-minute average opacity measured and SR6 are not operating under startup by this COMS is greater than 20 percent conditions while burning residual fuel Q: Does EPA determine that a thermal and that a violation occurs when oil to produce auxiliary steam. For units chip dryer operated at 660 degrees opacity exceeds 20 percent for one SR4 and SR6, ‘‘startup’’ (as defined in Fahrenheit in order to remove water percent or more of the operating time in subpart UUUUU) ends when steam is from aluminum shreds containing paint a semi-annual period? generated for any purpose, such as is not an affected source under NESHAP subpart RRR at Matalco (US), Inc.’s A2: Yes. Based on the excess burning residual fuel oil to heat on-site (Matalco’s) secondary aluminum emissions criteria furnished by IP, the residual fuel oil tanks or burning production facility in Lordstown, Ohio? EPA agrees that these are the conditions bituminous coal to generate electricity for sale. A: No. Based on the information where excess emissions will occur. provided, EPA determines that the Abstract for [M200003] Abstract for [M200005] thermal chip dryer operated in the Q: Does EPA determine that the proposed manner would be an affected Q: Does EPA approve use of an lithium ion battery manufacturing source under NESHAP subpart RRR, alternative monitoring plan (AMP) for process at LG Chem Michigan (Holland) consistent with the operations of a New-Indy Catawba, LLC (New-Indy) to in Holland, Michigan is subject to ‘‘scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/ reduce the frequency of conducting leak NESHAP subpart VVVVVV? decoating kiln’’ as defined under detection and repair monitoring of any A: No. Based on the information that subpart RRR and according to the record closed vent system, fixed roof cover, or was provided, EPA determines that the of subpart RRR. Further, Matalco does enclosure that is characterized as unsafe lithium ion battery manufacturing not sufficiently address the temperature or difficult to monitor at New-Indy’s process is an area source subject to level that would assure no emissions of paper mill in Catawba, South Carolina NESHAP subpart CCCCCCC. In hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), to that is subject to NESHAP subpart S? accordance with 40 CFR 63.11607, support their belief that no hydrocarbon A: Yes. EPA conditionally approves Holland’s description of their cathode or dioxins/furans emissions would be use of an AMP if the owner or operator mixing line meets the definition of produced while operating the dryer at determines that personnel performing ‘‘paint and allied product 660 degrees Fahrenheit. During periods the inspections and monitoring would manufacturing,’’ the cathode slurry when the thermal chip dryer is be exposed to an imminent or potential mixture produced by Holland meets the processing aluminum shreds containing danger, or if the equipment could not be definition of ‘‘paints and allied paint at or near 660 °F, the dryer must inspected without elevating the products,’’ and the nickel used in the comply with the major source inspection or monitoring personnel process meets the definition of requirements in subpart RRR for a scrap more than two meters above a support ‘‘material containing hazardous air dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating kiln. surface. In lieu of the current 30-day pollutant (HAP).’’ visual inspections of closed vent system Abstract for [M200008] components and pulping condensate Abstract for [M200006] Q: Does EPA approve an alternative closed-collection system and annual Q: Does EPA approve an Alternative plan (AMP) to establish the fan inspections to verify there are no Monitoring Plan (AMP) for mercury (Hg) amperage operating limits for the Ducon detectable emissions from closed vent and chlorine (Cl) compliance testing to scrubbers installed on the smelt system components and condensate supplement the fuel types that result in dissolving tanks subject to NESHAP storage tanks, the AMP requires worst-case Hg and Cl emissions (i.e., subpart MM at International Paper monitoring or inspections to be wood and tire-derived fuel (TDF)) with Company’s Kraft pulp mill in Bogalusa, conducted at least once every five years, No. 6 fuel oil in order to reach Louisiana (Bogalusa Mill) as the or more frequently if possible. New-Indy maximum operating load during the midpoint between the no-load amperage must submit a site-specific monitoring performance test, but remove the heat value and the lowest of the 1-hour and inspection plan that identifies the input of the No. 6 fuel oil when average fan amperage values determined equipment that are classified as unsafe calculating the maximum Hg and Cl during compliance testing? or difficult to monitor and are therefore concentrations on a lb/MMBtu basis as A: Yes. Based on the information subject to the AMP, which we required in 40 CFR 63.7530(b)(1), for the provided, EPA conditionally approves understand includes 0.4 percent of the No. 2 Combination Boiler at New-Indy the AMP for Bogalusa Mill. EPA agrees leak detection and repair (LDAR) Catawba, LLC (New-Indy’s) paper mill that fluctuations in fan amperage for a inspection points subject to Subpart S, in Catawba, South Carolina that is constant speed fan are a function of including an explanation of why the subject to NESHAP subpart DDDDD? atmospheric conditions, rather than of component is unsafe to monitor or A: Yes. Based on New-Indy’s scrubber performance; therefore, setting inspect and a description of how the description of the process, equations for the fan amperage limit at the lowest 1- equipment will be monitored or demonstrating compliance, and plans to hour average fan amperage value based inspected during safe-to-monitor or safe- maintain records of fuel usage following on compliance testing in accordance

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:48 Feb 19, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM 22FEN1 tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES 10580 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 33 / Monday, February 22, 2021 / Notices

with 40 CFR 63.864(j)(5)(i)(A) could especially if the event starts late in the Abstract for [Z200003] cause reporting of deviations that do not 15-minute block. Q: Does EPA approve an alternative represent exceedances of the applicable Abstract for [Z190001] monitoring plan (AMP) during periods emission limits. The AMP conditions of annual regenerative thermal oxidizer applicable to each of Bogalusa Mill’s Q: Does EPA approve an alternative monitoring plan (AMP) to conduct (RTO) shut down for maintenance and scrubbers are specified in the EPA production curtailment for Group 2 response letter. performance testing at the highest achievable engine load and demonstrate asphalt storage tanks at CertainTeed’s Abstract for [M200009] continuous compliance via pressure asphalt roofing manufacturing facility in Q: Does EPA approve an alternative differential (i.e. pressure drop) Shakopee, Minnesota subject to monitoring plan (AMP) to establish the measurements across the catalyst at plus NESHAP subpart LLLLL, to use a digital fan amperage operating limits for the or minus 10 percent of the highest camera opacity technique (DCOT) or Ducon scrubbers installed on the smelt achievable engine load established conduct EPA Method 9 and 22 testing dissolving tanks subject to NESHAP during the performance test, for twenty- on mist eliminators in lieu of parametric subpart MM at International Paper four of Red Cedar Gathering Company’s monitoring of mist eliminators or Company’s Kraft pulp mill in Mansfield, (Red Cedar’s) stationary reciprocating regenerative thermal oxidizers (RTOs)? Louisiana (Mansfield Mill) as the internal combustion engines installed at A: Yes. Based on the information midpoint between the no-load amperage five compressor stations (i.e., Midway, provided, EPA conditionally approves value and the lowest of the 1-hour Ponderosa, Spring Creek, Sambrito, and an AMP for Group 2 asphalt storage average fan amperage values determined Trail Canyon) located on the Southern tanks 1 through 6 and 11 (hereafter during compliance testing? Ute Indian Reservation in Colorado referred to as ‘‘AMP tanks’’) for periods A: Yes. Based on the information subject to NESHAP subpart ZZZZ? up to 1,000 hours of RTO shutdown due provided, EPA conditionally approves A: Yes. Based on information to maintenance outage or production the AMP for Mansfield Mill. EPA agrees provided by Red Cedar regarding curtailment (where only AMP tanks are that fluctuations in fan amperage for a declining field conditions that in operation) if no parametric constant speed fan are a function of necessitate engine operation at lower monitoring is conducted on the mist atmospheric conditions, rather than of loads, EPA conditionally approves the eliminator; otherwise, CertainTeed must scrubber performance; therefore, setting AMP for the twenty-four engines use a mist eliminator in series with an the fan amperage limit at the lowest 1- identified in Table 1 of the EPA RTO and monitor RTO operating hour average fan amperage value based response letter. For each of the twenty- parameters to comply with the on compliance testing in accordance four engines, Red Cedar must maintain particulate matter standards in subpart with 40 CFR 63.864(j)(5)(i)(A) could records on a daily basis of the engine LLLLL for the AMP tanks. Specifically, cause reporting of deviations that do not load, and if an engine load increases or for RTO shutdown periods up to 750 represent exceedances of the applicable decreases by 10 percent from the highest hours, CertainTeed must use EPA emission limits. The AMP conditions achievable engine load during the Method 9 and/or EPA Method 22; and applicable to each of Mansfield Mill’s performance test, Red Cedar must re-test for RTO shutdown periods between 751 scrubbers are specified in the EPA and re-establish the baseline pressure and 1,000 hours, CertainTeed must use response letter. drop across the catalyst. the DCOT method outlined in Section 9.2 of the ASTM D7520–2016. Abstract for [M200015] Abstract for [Z200002] Alternatively, CertainTeed may use the Q: Does EPA agree with the American Q: Does EPA approve an alternative DCOT method for an entire shutdown Petroleum Institute (API) that the monitoring plan (AMP) to establish the period up to 1,000 hours. If DCOT is Petroleum Refinery MACT Subpart CC, fan amperage operating limits for the used, CertainTeed must monitor once a paragraphs 63.670 (d) and (e) mean that Ducon UW–4 scrubbers installed on the shift or twice daily for a continuous 6- the NHVcz requirements only apply smelt dissolving tanks subject to minute period and retain records for 5 starting with the block that contains the NESHAP subpart MM at Georgia- years of the date, start time, end time, 15th minute of a flare event and do not Pacific’s Kraft pulp mill in Cedar operator’s name, and results for the apply to the previous 15-minute block Springs, Georgia (Cedar Springs Mill) as readings and pictures. Otherwise, during which the event started which the midpoint between the no-load CertainTeed must conduct a six-minute would not include more than a fraction amperage value and the lowest of the 1- Method 9 reading on the first day of of flow in that period? hour average fan amperage values shutdown and for each subsequent day A: Yes. The MACT CC regulation, determined during compliance testing? a six-minute Method 9 or 22 reading paragraphs 63.670 (d) and (e) both state A: Yes. Based on the information once a shift or twice during daylight that the source must comply with provided, EPA conditionally approves hours, and retain the original copies of applicable limits of combustion zone the AMP for Cedar Springs Mill. EPA the Method 9 and/or Method 22 sheets heat content and velocity when agrees that fluctuations in amperage for for 5 years. Any readings indicating regulated materials are routed to the a constant speed fan are a function of emissions above the zero-opacity flare for at least 15 minutes. Therefore, atmospheric conditions, rather than of standard must be reported as deviations. the limits apply starting with the 15- scrubber performance; therefore, setting The number of hours of RTO shutdown minute block that includes a full 15 the fan amperage limit at the lowest 1- time must be tracked on a 12-month minutes of the flaring event. EPA hour average fan amperage value based rolling sum. Further, during RTO recognizes that compliance with limits on compliance testing in accordance shutdown periods, there may be no during the first 15-minute block of a with 40 CFR 63.864(j)(5)(i)(A) could loading or unloading of AMP tanks, and flaring event could be problematic, at cause reporting of deviations that do not the temperature of AMP tanks may not least for meeting the NHVcz minimum represent exceedances of the applicable exceed 450 degrees Fahrenheit. because if the release is of low BTU gas, emission limits. The AMP conditions a source might not have time to adjust for each of Cedar Springs Mill’s Abstract for [Z200004] supplement natural gas and/or adjust scrubbers are specified in the EPA Q: Does EPA determine that frit steam or air to correct the NHVcz, response letter. production processes owned by Prince

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:48 Feb 19, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM 22FEN1 tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 33 / Monday, February 22, 2021 / Notices 10581

Minerals, LLC (Prince) in Leesburg, to demonstrate compliance with subpart Audit Division Recommendation Alabama meet the applicability criteria ZZZZ. Memorandum on Dr. Raul Ruiz for Congress (A19–03) of NESHAP subparts BBBBBBB, John Dombrowski, CCCCCCC, and/or VVVVVV? Management and Administrative Deputy Director, Office of Compliance, Office Matters A: Based on the information provided, of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance. CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: EPA determines that Prince’s frit [FR Doc. 2021–03489 Filed 2–19–21; 8:45 am] production processes meet the Judith Ingram, Press Officer. Telephone: BILLING CODE 6560–50–P (202) 694–1220. applicability criteria of subpart CCCCCCC and do not meet the Authority: Government in the Sunshine applicability criteria for subparts Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b BBBBBBB and VVVVVV. Subpart FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Laura E. Sinram, CCCCCCC is applicable to Prince’s Sunshine Act Meetings Acting Secretary and Clerk of the facility because the subpart lists NAICS Commission. code 3255 and defines ‘‘paints and TIME AND DATE: Thursday, February 25, [FR Doc. 2021–03694 Filed 2–18–21; 4:15 pm] allied products manufacturing’’ as the 2021 at 10:00 a.m. BILLING CODE 6715–01–P production of paints and allied products PLACE: Virtual hearing. Note: Because of (e.g., coatings) intended to ‘‘leave a the covid-19 pandemic, we will conduct dried film of solid material on a the hearing virtually. If you would like DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND substrate,’’ and the subpart defines to access the hearing, see the HUMAN SERVICES ‘‘material containing HAP’’ as including instructions below. any material containing nickel in Food and Drug Administration STATUS: amounts greater than 0.1 percent by This hearing will be open to the public. To access the virtual hearing, go [Docket No. FDA–2020–N–1652] weight. Subpart BBBBBBB defines to the commission’s website ‘‘chemical preparation’’ as being Agency Information Collection www.fec.gov and click on the banner to Activities; Submission for Office of manufactured in a process described by be taken to the hearing page. the NAICS code 325998, so subpart Management and Budget Review; MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: BBBBBBB is not applicable. Subpart Repayment Comment Request; Dispute Resolution Hearing: Jill Stein for President. VVVVVV includes an applicability Procedures for Science-Based exclusion for sources subject to Subpart CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Decisions on Products by the Center CCCCCCC, so subpart VVVVVV is not Judith Ingram, Press Officer. Telephone: for Veterinary Medicine (202) 694–1220. applicable. AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, Authority: Government in the Sunshine HHS. Abstract for [Z200005] Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b. ACTION: Notice. Q: Does EPA approve an alternative Laura E. Sinram, SUMMARY: monitoring plan (AMP) for six Acting Secretary and Clerk of the The Food and Drug reciprocating internal combustion Commission. Administration (FDA, Agency, or we) is announcing that a proposed collection engines (RICEs) operating at less than [FR Doc. 2021–03692 Filed 2–18–21; 4:15 pm] of information has been submitted to the 100 percent maximum load during BILLING CODE 6715–01–P Office of Management and Budget compliance testing at Kinder Morgan (OMB) for review and clearance under Natural Gas Pipeline’s Houston Central the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Gas Plant in Sheridan, Texas subject to FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION DATES: NESHAP subpart ZZZZ? Submit written comments Sunshine Act Meetings (including recommendations) on the A: Yes. Based on the information collection of information by March 24, provided, EPA conditionally approves TIME AND DATE: Thursday, February 25, 2021. an AMP to conduct performance testing 2021 following the conclusion of the ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on for engines COMP–1, COMP–35, and repayment hearing. the information collection are received, COMP–13C at a maximum engine load PLACE: Virtual meeting. Note: Because of OMB recommends that written of 85 percent with subsequent the covid-19 pandemic, we will conduct comments be submitted to https:// monitoring required at 85 percent plus the open meeting virtually. If you would www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. or minus 10 percent load, and for like to access the meeting, see the Find this particular information engines COMP–349, COMP–350, and instructions below. collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under COMP–8 at a maximum engine load of STATUS: This meeting will be open to the Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or 90 percent with subsequent monitoring public. To access the virtual meeting, go by using the search function. The OMB required at 90 percent plus or minus 10 to the commission’s website control number for this information percent load. EPA agrees that these six www.fec.gov and click on the banner to collection is 0910–0566. Also include RICEs cannot operate at 100 percent be taken to the meeting page. the FDA docket number found in plus or minus 10 percent operational MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: brackets in the heading of this load during compliance testing as Draft Advisory Opinion 2021–02: Full document. specified in 40 CFR 63.6620(b)(2) due to Employment Now-Political Action FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ila site-specific operations. If operations Committee (FEC–PAC) S. Mizrachi, Office of Operations, Food change such that the maximum load of Draft Advisory Opinion 2021–03: and Drug Administration, Three White the engines exceeds these alternative National Republican Senatorial Flint North, 10A–12M, 11601 lower maximum loads, the AMP will Committee (NRSC) and National Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD become null and void and retesting at Republican Congressional Committee 20852, 301–796–7726, PRAStaff@ the higher engine load will be required (NRCC) fda.hhs.gov.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:48 Feb 19, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM 22FEN1 tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES