Solution Preparation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Solution Preparation 10 Reasons to Say Goodbye To Inaccurate Concentrations In the laboratory, there are numerous factors which can introduce error into your processes and lead to Out-of-Specification (OOS) results. But did you know that everyday manual sample processing steps account for up to 50% of such errors in an analytical workflow? Accurate preparation of samples and standards is a fundamental starting point for any analysis, whether in analytical, quality control or testing labs, in the pharmaceutical, chemical or food industries, to name but a few. To prepare an accurate solution, a sample or standard must be accurately weighed on an appropriate balance. Then, the precise amount of solvent must be added to make up to the required concentration. Manual volumetric sample preparation contributes many potential errors to the process. Solution Preparation Solution By switching to automated gravimetric methods, you will not only reduce errors and variability, but will also benefit from increased accuracy, safety and resource savings. We outline 10 good reasons why you should say goodbye to inaccurate concentrations in your laboratory. Errors in volumetric sample preparation can lead to out-of-specification results Challenges of traditional methods Flask-based, volumetric sample • Temperature variation. In addition to error risks, preparation has not changed Volumetric flasks are typically volumetric methods also tend to significantly in decades. The calibrated at 20 °C. However, lead to excessive use of workflow is manual and time flask contents are not always substances and solvents. This is a consuming, and it relies on measured at this specific waste of money, especially when subjective assumptions and temperature. Temperature substances are expensive. steps with high potential for variations of the flask caused by human error. Common challenges reaction, sonication or even • Substance waste. Sample and and sources of variability or dishwashing can contribute standard solutions are prepared Solution Preparation Solution uncertainty in a typical volumetric to error potential. in volumes far in excess of what workflow include: is required. Only a small • Cross contamination. Cross- proportion is used for the • Operator error. Mistakes during contamination creates risk. analysis. The excess solution is materials or flask selection, However, defining an effective eventually discarded, creating weighing, sample transfer, washing process can be added disposal costs. dilution, and meniscus reading difficult, time-consuming, and make solution preparation highly expensive. variable. • Data errors. OOS results can • Glassware failure. A paper from also arise from incorrect labeling the “National Institute of or incomplete description of Standards and Technology” flask contents. Transcription (NIST) states that new error a common problem when glassware fails to meet Class A manually recording process specifications as often as 50 results. percent of the time. Pipettes Flasks Volume (ml) Relative % Error Volume (ml) Relative % Error 1 0.60 5 0.40 2 0.30 10 0.20 3 0.33 25 0.12 4 0.25 50 0.10 5 0.20 100 0.08 10 0.20 200 0.05 Table 1: Relative percentage errors for Class A glassware 2 What does gravimetric sample preparation really mean? There is now a single, easy-to-per- While the principle works with both effort. On that basis alone, this form sample preparation method that manual and automated methods, mass-based method deserves eliminates all these sources of error using a balance equipped with consideration – but that’s just the at once using mass as the basis for the ability to automatically dose beginning. Read on to discover 10 measurement, instead of volume. a solvent based on the mass of important reasons why this gravi- This method requires little more than weighed-in solids means that pre- metric method for preparing accu- the analytical or semi-micro balance cise concentrations are achieved rate solutions belongs in your lab. you already use in your lab. every time with less operator Weigh sample Record actual weight. Rinse paper. Fill to Calculate Label flask within tolerance Transfer sample to meniscus. Put on concentration onto weigh paper volumetric flask stopper. Invert flask Weighing errors Transcription errors Subjective, depends Calculation Transcription Time consuming Flask cleanliness on operator training errors errors Flask selection Figure 1: Volumetric preparation is highly manual, subjective, and variable Set target Weigh in sample Automated Diluent added Label vial concentration directly in the vial calculation Required Approximate Calculation based Automated liquid Automated label concentration weight on sample weight and dosing printing target concentration Figure 2: Automated dosing eliminates subjectivity and variability 3 Why Should I Switch to Gravimetric Sample Preparation? Gravimetric sample preparation is increases – yet larger flasks 5. Use smaller sample volumes. simply the preparation of a solution require more solvent and sub- The amount of solution by weighing both the sample stance for solution preparation. prepared is not dictated by the and the solvent. It generates an The challenge is in finding the discrete intervals of volumetric accurate concentration. The sample right compromise between error flasks available. Combined with or standard can be weighed into a risk and materials use. Gravi- the lower minimum weight vial (rather than using a volumetric metric solution preparation achievable when using mass- flask) either manually or with eliminates time-consuming based dosing, smaller sample automated dispensing. The correct glassware vs. process needs amounts can be used, smaller Solution Preparation Solution amount of solvent is calculated and analysis, as only the required solution volumes prepared, and added automatically to achieve a amount of solution is prepared. less material wasted for precise concentration, leading to significant cost savings. accurate and high quality analyses 3. Eliminate subjective readings. from start to finish. Adding liquid by Sources of variability mount 6. Use significantly less solvent. weight based on the actual weight during the solvent addition Gravimetric sample prepa- of the dosed solids helps you: step. First and fore-most, ration ensures that solvent volumetric meniscus reading is addition is precisely calculated 1. Eliminate manual variability. highly subjective and can vary based on actual amounts of Manual volumetric sample from operator to operator. dispensed solid sample. It also preparation is variable and has Mass-based dosing, on the means using much less a high potential for introducing other hand, relies on weight solvent, because the volume errors, as described earlier. A values rather than “eyeballed” prepared is no longer dictated mass-based method estimates. by the volumes of available (gravimetric sample glassware. Solvent use is preparation) avoids these error- 4. Create precise concentrations further reduced due to reduced prone manual steps eliminating quickly, even with manual cleaning of glassware. Time- the need to transfer sample weigh-in. Automated liquid consuming serial dilutions to from a weighing paper to dosing delivers precise reach desired concentrations volumetric flask, and removing concentrations every time, can also be achieved in less the influence of temperature because solvent is added steps. variations. automatically based on the actual weight of weighed-in 7. Stop maintaining expensive 2. Get to work faster. Flask selec- solids. This means manual glassware. Instead of using tion in volumetric workflows powder dosing can be a calibrated volumetric flask requires a thorough process approximate, eliminating time- and volumetric pipettes, pow- understanding. As glassware consuming scooping in or out ders and liquids are dispensed volume decreases, error risk to meet exact targets. into small, disposable vials 4 placed directly on the weighing with electronic transfer, elimi- of time an operator is exposed pan of the XPR Automatic Bal- nates risk of transcription to the solid substance. ance. Disposable vials are far errors. Automated label printing more cost-effective than expen- also ensures data is complete. 10. Reduce or eliminate cross- sive calibrated volumetric contamination risk. Disposable glassware. 9. Reduce or eliminate exposure vials are used just one time, risk. When dispensing solids eliminating the need for a robust 8. Ensure traceability and meet automatically, in combination flask-washing system for expen- compliance requirements. The with automated liquid dispens- sive volumetric glassware, as ability to recall critical meta- ing, substances are dispensed well as the risk of cross-con- data such as when a solution directly into the target vial with tamination that occurs when was prepared and its sample no manual intervention by the cleaning SOPs are not followed. ID is paramount during audits. operator. Sample transfer using When preparing samples using spatulas or weighing papers – mass on a balance, target and the exposure risk that weights, actual weights, and comes with it – is eliminated. achieved concentrations can be Even during manual weigh-in of recorded automatically. Auto- solids, automated liquid dosing mated recording of weight and means weights do not need to concentration measurements, be precise, reducing the amount 5 Gravimetric benefits summarized Overall, gravimetric sample • Valuable resource savings highly variable, error-prone and preparation utilizing automated • Enhanced ergonomics
Recommended publications
  • Laboratory Glassware N Edition No
    Laboratory Glassware n Edition No. 2 n Index Introduction 3 Ground joint glassware 13 Volumetric glassware 53 General laboratory glassware 65 Alphabetical index 76 Índice alfabético 77 Index Reference index 78 [email protected] Scharlau has been in the scientific glassware business for over 15 years Until now Scharlab S.L. had limited its sales to the Spanish market. However, now, coinciding with the inauguration of the new workshop next to our warehouse in Sentmenat, we are ready to export our scientific glassware to other countries. Standard and made to order Products for which there is regular demand are produced in larger Scharlau glassware quantities and then stocked for almost immediate supply. Other products are either manufactured directly from glass tubing or are constructed from a number of semi-finished products. Quality Even today, scientific glassblowing remains a highly skilled hand craft and the quality of glassware depends on the skill of each blower. Careful selection of the raw glass ensures that our final products are free from imperfections such as air lines, scratches and stones. You will be able to judge for yourself the workmanship of our glassware products. Safety All our glassware is annealed and made stress free to avoid breakage. Fax: +34 93 715 67 25 Scharlab The Lab Sourcing Group 3 www.scharlab.com Glassware Scharlau glassware is made from borosilicate glass that meets the specifications of the following standards: BS ISO 3585, DIN 12217 Type 3.3 Borosilicate glass ASTM E-438 Type 1 Class A Borosilicate glass US Pharmacopoeia Type 1 Borosilicate glass European Pharmacopoeia Type 1 Glass The typical chemical composition of our borosilicate glass is as follows: O Si 2 81% B2O3 13% Na2O 4% Al2O3 2% Glass is an inorganic substance that on cooling becomes rigid without crystallising and therefore it has no melting point as such.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Chemistry Method Methoxyfenozide & Degradates In
    Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: 110356 Page 12 Method Validation Study for the Detennination of Residues of Methoxyfenozide and its A-ring • Phenol Metabolite and B-ring Mono Acid Metabolite in Surface Water, Ground Water and Drinking Water by Liquid Chromatography with Tandem Mass Spectrometry INTRODUCTION J This method is applicable for the quantitative detennination of residues of methoxyfenozide and its A-ring phenol metabolite and B-ring mono acid metabolite in surface, ground and drinking water. The method was validated over the concentration range of 0.05-1.0 µg/L with a validated limit of quantitation of 0.05 µg/L. Common names, chemical names, and molecular formulas for the analytes are given in Table I. This study was conducted to fulfill data requirements outlined in the EPA Residue Chemistry Test Guidelines, OPPTS 850. 7100 (/). The validation will also comply with the requirements of EU Council Regulation (EC) No. 1107/2009 with particular regard to Section 3 of SANCO/3029/99 rev.4 and Section 3 of SANCO/825/00 rev.8.1 as well as PMRA Regulatory Directive Dir98-02 (2-4). The validation was conducted following Dow AgroSciences SOP ECL-24 with exceptions noted in the protocol or by protocol amendment. Method Principle Residues of methoxyfenozide, its A-ring phenol metabolite and its B-ring mono acid metabolite • are extracted from water samples by taking a l 0.0-mL aliquot and placing in an I I -dram (45-mL) glass vial equipped with a PTFE-lined cap or a 50-mL polypropylene centrifuge tube equipped with a cap.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Equipment Reference Sheet
    Laboratory Equipment Stirring Rod: Reference Sheet: Iron Ring: Description: Glass rod. Uses: To stir combinations; To use in pouring liquids. Evaporating Dish: Description: Iron ring with a screw fastener; Several Sizes Uses: To fasten to the ring stand as a support for an apparatus Description: Porcelain dish. Buret Clamp/Test Tube Clamp: Uses: As a container for small amounts of liquids being evaporated. Glass Plate: Description: Metal clamp with a screw fastener, swivel and lock nut, adjusting screw, and a curved clamp. Uses: To hold an apparatus; May be fastened to a ring stand. Mortar and Pestle: Description: Thick glass. Uses: Many uses; Should not be heated Description: Heavy porcelain dish with a grinder. Watch Glass: Uses: To grind chemicals to a powder. Spatula: Description: Curved glass. Uses: May be used as a beaker cover; May be used in evaporating very small amounts of Description: Made of metal or porcelain. liquid. Uses: To transfer solid chemicals in weighing. Funnel: Triangular File: Description: Metal file with three cutting edges. Uses: To scratch glass or file. Rubber Connector: Description: Glass or plastic. Uses: To hold filter paper; May be used in pouring Description: Short length of tubing. Medicine Dropper: Uses: To connect parts of an apparatus. Pinch Clamp: Description: Glass tip with a rubber bulb. Uses: To transfer small amounts of liquid. Forceps: Description: Metal clamp with finger grips. Uses: To clamp a rubber connector. Test Tube Rack: Description: Metal Uses: To pick up or hold small objects. Beaker: Description: Rack; May be wood, metal, or plastic. Uses: To hold test tubes in an upright position.
    [Show full text]
  • 32-9-2.5.2 Stop TB Global Drug Facility Diagnostics Catalog [.Pdf]
    OCTOBER 2019 DIAGNOSTICS CATALOG GLOBAL DRUG FACILITY (GDF) PHOTO: MAKA AKHALAIA PHOTO: Ensuring an uninterrupted supply of quality-assured, affordable tuberculosis (TB) medicines and diagnostics to the world. stoptb.org/gdf Stop TB Partnership | Global Drug Facility Global Health Campus – Chemin du Pommier 40 1218 Le Grand-Saconnex | Geneva, Switzerland Email: [email protected] Last verion's date: 08 October 2019. Stop TB Partnership/Global Drug Facility licensed this product under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode GLOBAL DRUG FACILITY DIAGNOSTICS CATALOG OCTOBER 2019 GDF is the largest global provider of quality-assured tuberculosis (TB) medicines, diagnostics, and laboratory supplies to the public sector. Since 2001, GDF has facilitated access to high-quality TB care in over 130 countries, providing treatments to over 30 million people with TB and procuring and delivering more than $200 million worth of diagnostic equipment. As a unit of the Stop TB Partnership, GDF provides a full range of quality-assured products to meet the needs of any TB laboratory globally. GDF provides more than 500 diagnostics products, including the latest WHO-approved TB diagnostic devices and reagents, together with the consumables and ancillary devices required to ensure a safe working environment. These products cater to all levels of laboratories, ranging from peripheral health centers to centralized reference laboratories, and provide countries with the latest WHO-recommended technologies for detecting TB and drug resistance. To place an order for any diagnostics product, please follow the step-by-step guide available on the GDF website.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Equipment Used in Filtration
    KNOW YOUR LAB EQUIPMENTS Test tube A test tube, also known as a sample tube, is a common piece of laboratory glassware consisting of a finger-like length of glass or clear plastic tubing, open at the top and closed at the bottom. Beakers Beakers are used as containers. They are available in a variety of sizes. Although they often possess volume markings, these are only rough estimates of the liquid volume. The markings are not necessarily accurate. Erlenmeyer flask Erlenmeyer flasks are often used as reaction vessels, particularly in titrations. As with beakers, the volume markings should not be considered accurate. Volumetric flask Volumetric flasks are used to measure and store solutions with a high degree of accuracy. These flasks generally possess a marking near the top that indicates the level at which the volume of the liquid is equal to the volume written on the outside of the flask. These devices are often used when solutions containing dissolved solids of known concentration are needed. Graduated cylinder Graduated cylinders are used to transfer liquids with a moderate degree of accuracy. Pipette Pipettes are used for transferring liquids with a fixed volume and quantity of liquid must be known to a high degree of accuracy. Graduated pipette These Pipettes are calibrated in the factory to release the desired quantity of liquid. Disposable pipette Disposable transfer. These Pipettes are made of plastic and are useful for transferring liquids dropwise. Burette Burettes are devices used typically in analytical, quantitative chemistry applications for measuring liquid solution. Differing from a pipette since the sample quantity delivered is changeable, graduated Burettes are used heavily in titration experiments.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemistry 50 and 51 Laboratory Manual General Information
    Chemistry 50 and 51 Laboratory Manual General Information Mt. San Antonio College Chemistry Department 2019 - 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE………………………………………………………………………..………..… 1 GENERAL INFORMATION Safety………………..………………………..…………………………………INFORMATION….……… 3 Equipment……………………………………..……………………………….………….. 9 Techniques………………………………………………………………………………… 13 Heating……………………………………...……………………………….…..….… 13 Cleaning and Labeling Glassware……….……………………….........……........…... 14 Reading Analog Scales…………………………………………………..……….…... 14 Volumetric Flasks………………………………………………………..……….…... 15 Graduated Cylinders.………………………………………………………………..… 15 Volumetric Pipets……………………………………..…………………………..…... 16 Graduated Pipets……………….……………………..………………………….…… 16 Burets………………………….………………..………………..………..….………. 18 Analytical Balances…………………………………………………….……….…….. 19 Solution Preparation…………………………………………..……………….….…... 20 Percent Concentration....……………………………………………….……….…….. 20 Molarity……………………………………………………………………………….. 21 Dilution……………………………………………………………...………………… 22 Titration ………………………………………………………………....…………..... 23 Vacuum Filtration……………………….…………………………………..…….…… 24 Spectrophotometry and Beer’s Law…………………………………..…………..…... 25 Measurement of pH………………………………………………….….….……..…... 27 Pasco Spectrometer……………………………………..…………………...….…… 28 Vernier Go Direct Sensors ………………………..…………………...….………….. 31 Notebook…………………………………………………………….….………..……...... 35 Precision and Accuracy……………………………………………………….………....... 37 Spreadsheet and Graphing with Excel…..…………………..…………..……………....... 46 EXPERIMENTS PREFACE The laboratory
    [Show full text]
  • J-Sil Price List
    An ISO 9001 : 2008 Certified Company TM J-SIL LABORATORY GLASSWARE Made from Borosilicate 3.3 Glass PRICE LIST 1st April, 2015 Manufactured by : J-SIL SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES MFRS. OF : SCIENTIFIC & LABORATORY GLASS APPARATUS 48-B, INDUSTR IAL ESTATE, NUNHAI, AGRA-282006 (INDIA) Phone : 2281967, 2281887 l Fax : 0562-2280186 E-mail : jsil @sancharnet.in, [email protected] Web : www.j-sil.com LABORATORY GLASS APPARATUS J-SIL 51. Chromatography Graduated, Screw Vials 9 mm wide Opening Type Cap Pkt Price/ Pkt A Clear Glass 2ml 100 PC 650.00 B Amber Glass 2ml 100 PC 700.00 56. Screw Cap with Septa for 9 mm Screw Vials (Closure) Cap Septa Pkt Price/ Pkt A Blue Non Slit 100 PC 750.00 B Blue Pre-Slit 100 PC 775.00 61. Clear Glass Screw Vials 9mm with Screw Blue Cap & PTFE-Silicon Septa (Combo) Cap Septa Pkt Price/ Pkt A 2 ml Non Slit 100 PC 1350.00 B 2 ml Pre-Slit 100 PC 1400.00 66. Amber Clear Glass Screw Vials 9mm with Screw Blue Cap & PTFE-Silicon Septa (Combo) Cap Septa Pkt Price/ Pkt A 2 ml Non Slit 100 PC 1400.00 B 2 ml Pre-Slit 100 PC 1450.00 LABORATORY GLASS APPARATUS J-SIL 71. Nylon Syringe Filter (Non Sterile) Packed in Transparent Plastic Jar DIA MICRON Pkt Price/ Pkt A 13 mm 0.22µm 100 1800.00 B 13 mm 0.45µm 100 1800.00 C 25 mm 0.22µm 100 1850.00 D 25 mm 0.45µm 100 1850.00 76. PVDF Syringe Filter (Non Sterile) Packed in Transparent Plastic Jar DIA MICRON Pkt Price/ Pkt A 13 mm 0.22µm 100 2800.00 B 13 mm 0.45µm 100 2800.00 C 25 mm 0.22µm 100 2850.00 D 25 mm 0.45µm 100 2850.00 81.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods of Analysis of Nbs Clay Standards
    I I I i National Bureau of Standards OF STAND & TECH NAT'L INST. Library, E-01 Admin. Bldg. OCT 1 1981 A UNITED STAT DEPARTMENT n L qLnPIP COMMERC A111Db 3bDE12 131008 PUBLICATION NBS SPECIAL PUBLICATION 260"3/r-a>7 Standard Reference Materials: METHODS OF ANALYSIS OF NBS CLAY STANDARDS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 100 • U57 C5L NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS The National 1 Bureau of Standards was established by an act of Congress March 3, 1901. The Bureau's overall goal is to strengthen and advance the Nation's science and technology and facilitate their effective application for public benefit. To this end, the Bureau conducts research and provides: (1) a basis for the Nation's physical measure- ment system, (2) scientific and technological services for industry and government, (3) a technical basis for equity in trade, and (4) technical services to promote public safety. The Bureau consists of the Institute for Basic Standards, the Institute for Materials Research, the Institute for Applied Technology, the Center for Computer Sciences and Technology, and the Office for Information Programs. THE INSTITUTE FOR BASIC STANDARDS provides the central basis within the United States of a complete and consistent system of physical measurement; coordinates that system with measurement systems of other nations; and furnishes essential services leading to accurate and uniform physical measurements throughout the Nation's scien- tific community, industry, and commerce. The Institute consists of a Center for Radia- tion Research, an Office of Measurement Services and the following divisions: Applied Mathematics—Electricity—Heat—Mechanics—Optical Physics—Linac Radiation 2—Nuclear Radiation 2—Applied Radiation 2—Quantum Electronics 3— Electromagnetics 3—Time and Frequency3—Laboratory Astrophysics 3—Cryo- 3 genics .
    [Show full text]
  • MT 220-04 (06/01/04) 1 of 5 METHODS of SAMPLING AND
    MT 220-04 (06/01/04) METHODS OF SAMPLING AND TESTING MT 220-04 SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF SOILS (Modified AASHTO T 100) 1 Scope 1.1 This method covers determination of the specific gravity of soils by means of a pycnometer. When the soil is composed of particles larger than the 4.75 mm (No. 4) sieve, the method outlined in MT 205 Specific Gravity and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate shall be followed. When the soil is composed of particles both larger and smaller than the 4.75 mm sieve, the sample shall be separated on the 4.75 mm sieve and the appropriate test method used on each portion. The specific gravity value for the soil shall be the weighted average of the two values (See Note 1). When the specific gravity value is to be used in calculations in connection with the hydrometer portion of AASHTO T 88, Particle-Size Analysis of Soils, it is intended that the specific gravity test be made on that portion of the soil that passes the 2.00 mm (No. 10) sieve. 1.2 The following applies to all specified limits in this standard: For the purposes of determining conformance with these specifications, an observed value or a calculated value shall be rounded off "to the nearest unit" in the last right-hand place of figures used in expressing the limiting value. Note 1 – The weighted average specific gravity should be calculated using the following equation: Gavg = 1 R1 P1 _______ + ______ 100G1 100G2 where: Gavg = weighted average specific gravity of soils composed of particles larger and smaller than the 4.75 mm (No.
    [Show full text]
  • CHM 130 - Accuracy and the Measurement of Volume
    CHM 130 - Accuracy and the Measurement of Volume PURPOSE: The purpose of this experiment is to practice using various types of volume measuring apparatus, focusing on their uses and accuracy. DISCUSSION: Volume measuring apparatus come in several different designs – graduated cylinders, volumetric flasks, pipets, burets, etc. Each design has a different application and a different accuracy. We are going to study these applications and the accuracy of the designs. In general, the less accurate the apparatus is, the easier and faster it is to use. So if great accuracy is not needed, why not be practical and use the fast and easy apparatus. In an experiment, the measurements made using a volume measuring apparatus should be at least as accurate as all the other measurements made in the experiment. For this reason, it is important to know the accuracy of different apparatus that are available. There are two kinds of errors in measurements. ACCURACY is the error associated with how close a measurement is to the true or actual value. If an instrument gives values that are very close to the true value we say that it is ACCURATE. Example: A graduated cylinder upon measuring the same sample three times gave 566 mL, 584 mL, and 541 mL. The average of these three values is 563.7 mL. If the true value was 563.688 mL, we would say that the average was accurate but the individual measurements were neither accurate nor precise. PRECISION is the error associated with how close several measurements of the same quantity are to each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Procedures for Volumetric Calibrations
    NISTIR 7383 Selected Procedures for Volumetric Calibrations Georgia L Harris NIST Weights & Measures Division NISTIR 7383 Selected Procedures for Volumetric Calibrations Georgia L Harris Weights and Measures Division Technology Services November 2006 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY William Jeffrey, Director Foreword This NIST IR of Selected Publications has been compiled as an interim update for a number of Good Laboratory Practices, Good Measurement Practices, and Standard Operating Procedures. Many of these procedures are updates to procedures that were originally published in NBS Handbook 145, Handbook for the Quality Assurance of Metrological Measurements, in 1986, by Henry V. Oppermann and John K. Taylor. The updates have incorporated many of the requirements noted for procedures in ISO Guide 25, ANSI/NCSL Z 540-1-1994, and ISO/IEC 17025 laboratory [quality] management systems. The major changes incorporate 1) uncertainty analyses that comply with current international methods in the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurements (GUM) and 2) measurement assurance techniques using check standards. No substantive changes were made to core measurement processes or equations, with the exception of SOP 18, Standard Operating Procedure for Calibration of Graduated Neck-Type Metal Volumetric Field Standards, Volume Transfer Method. Temperature limits and equations have been added to SOP 18. The following Practices and Procedures are new in this interim publication: Standard Operating Procedures for: • Small Volume Prover, Water Draw (26) • Small Volume Prover, Gravimetric Calibration (SVP) Special thanks go to the following individuals for the critical editorial reviews needed to complete this interim publication: • Kelley Larson, AZ Department of Weights and Measures • Dan Newcombe, ME Department of Agriculture Metrology Laboratory • William Erickson, MI Department of Agriculture, E.C.
    [Show full text]
  • ORA Laboratory Manual Volume IV Section 1 06/30/2020 Title: Laboratory Orientation Page 1 of 35
    OOD AND RUG DMINISTRATION Revision #: 02 F D A Document Number: OFFICE OF REGULATORY AFFAIRS Revision Date: IV-01 ORA Laboratory Manual Volume IV Section 1 06/30/2020 Title: Laboratory Orientation Page 1 of 35 Sections in This Document 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................... 2 2. FDA Laws and Regulations ......................................................................................................3 2.1. FD&C Act and Amendments ..........................................................................................3 2.2. Other Acts Enforced by FDA ..........................................................................................4 2.3. Code of Federal Regulations .........................................................................................7 2.4. Federal Register .............................................................................................................7 3. Analytical Methods ....................................................................................................................7 3.1. Official Compendia .........................................................................................................7 3.2. Specialized Manuals ......................................................................................................8 3.3. Other Method Sources ...................................................................................................9 3.4. Method Validation
    [Show full text]