Montclair State University Montclair State University Digital Commons Theses, Dissertations and Culminating Projects 5-2018 Queens of Failing Nations in Classical Tragedy Katie L. Toledano Montclair State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.montclair.edu/etd Part of the Classical Literature and Philology Commons Recommended Citation Toledano, Katie L., "Queens of Failing Nations in Classical Tragedy" (2018). Theses, Dissertations and Culminating Projects. 153. https://digitalcommons.montclair.edu/etd/153 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Montclair State University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Culminating Projects by an authorized administrator of Montclair State University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Abstract This thesis will compare the role that queens in failing nations, motivated by revenge, play as tragic heroes in Classical tragedy. Focusing on the classical tragedies of Euripides’ Medea and Hekabe to Seneca’s Medea and Trojan Women, this thesis compares the roles that these queens play as tragic heroes in both the Greek and Roman renditions. As politically significant characters and tragic heroes, Medea and Hecuba both operate as both poison and cure, representing nations and houses that are failing, on the basis of their identity and their actions. I have focused on how Euripides and Seneca offer queens and tragic heroes, ultimately creating a similar outcome--they nobly face dilemmas, for which there is no “easy” or “right” choice, and that they attain magnificence through the endurance of their unique plight. In their respective tragedies, Euripides and Seneca explore the boundaries of female agency, particularly in the sense that the Euripidean Hekabe actively resigns to her fate as a barking dog, explaining to Polymestor that “paying you back is my only concern” (1244); Seneca’s vision for Hecuba and Andromache is much more passive.