DOCSLIB.ORG

Free the Fall of the Roman Republic Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Free the Fall of the Roman Republic Pdf FREE THE FALL OF THE ROMAN REPUBLIC PDF Plutarch,Rex Warner,Robin Seager | 464 pages | 25 Apr 2006 | Penguin Books Ltd | 9780140449341 | English | London, United Kingdom The Fall of The Roman Republic | Open Universities Australia Internal The Fall of the Roman Republic provoked in BC by economic stagnation in the city of Romeslave revolts without, and dissension in the military precipitated a period of unrelenting political upheaval known as the Roman Revolution, the Late Roman Republicor the Fall of the Republic, BC. In essence, the republic system of government underwent a painful and violent transition from irresponsible oligarchy to a more accountable autocratic form of government. While it is difficult to appreciate the political and social issues that provoked the incessant political disruptions of the late Republic, it is possible to discern a pattern in the devolution of legal, constitutional authority in the Republic. And C. Sempronius Gracchus exploited the power of the plebeian tribuneship to seize power in Rome. They essentially used their sacrosanctitas to veto all other public activity in the city in order to force the senate and the magistrates to focus on their own political agendas. They tried to restore order to the military by reclaiming public land and putting landless poor citizens back on land. Gracchus also attempted to grant Italian allies Roman citizen status. Both men were killed with their political followings through urban mob violence fomented by the aristocracy. When the oligarchy failed to resolve the military problem, Roman generals, specifically C. Marius consulBC and L. Cornelius Sulla consul 88, dictator BCrecruited private armies more loyal to themselves than to the state. In addition to the draft, they recruited landless poor citizens by offering them bounties and land upon discharge. The soldier's status as Roman or allied mattered little to these generals either, both of The Fall of the Roman Republic made extensive grants of citizenship to allied forces. Ultimately, the two men came to blows in 88 BC in the midst of the Social War and the Asian rebellion induced by Mithradates. So violent were popular feelings that Sulla was able to persuade his field army in southern Italy to march on the city of Rome to expel Marius and his followers. Three men, Cn. Pompeius Magnus, M. Licinius Crassus, and C. Julius Caesarcombined their influence to seize power in Rome. Pompey was an extremely popular general who defeated numerous enemies of the oligarchy, including a rebellion in Spain led by the renegade Roman general Q. Pompey had a loyal private army, but proved politically incapable The Fall of the Roman Republic delivering on his promises of land and bounties. As an officer of Sulla during the Civil War, Crassus had made himself the wealthiest man in Rome by profiting from Sulla's proscriptionsthat is, the outlawing of Roman citizens by putting their names on lists and putting a price on their heads, wanted dead or alive. All proscribed citizens saw their civil rights nullified and their property confiscated and auctioned off by the state. He used his wealth to buy influence in the Senate and throughout the urban populace and emerged as a powerful, but surreptitious influence on the roman state. Caesar began his career in a seemingly hopeless situation as the nephew of C. Marius confronted by the dictatorship of Sulla. As a young aristocrat he excelled at manipulation of the symbols of Marian reform and public generosity and became the darling of the masses by the late 60s BC. By offering his political abilities to aid Pompey and Crassus The Fall of the Roman Republic their political agendas, he rose to the consulship in 59 BC basically to work as a tool for his two more powerful partners. He delivered necessary legislation in the face of senatorial The Fall of the Roman Republic and received for his effort a year extraordinary command in Gaul. Intense rivalry existed between these three dynasts, but so long as they maintained their illegal political association, the senatorial aristocracy was powerless to thwart them. He hoped to use the aristocracy to reduce Caesar's influence with the army in Gauljust as the aristocracy hoped to use him for the same purpose if only to discard him once Caesar was destroyed. Pompey was defeated at Pharsalus and killed in Egyptand the rest of the oligarchs opposing Caesar were mopped up across the Mediterranean. Having defeated all his enemies, Caesar was granted a year dictatorship for purposes of restoring the republic. His solution was to reconstitute himself as a Roman form of Hellenistic divine king or ruler. Since BC however, the Romans had prided themselves with having obtained their freedom by expelling their Etruscan King. The very word king, REXwas anathema to the Republic mentality. Roman citizens had a civic duty to suppress any attempt at tyranny though political assassination and could do so with impunity. Although carefully avoiding the title "rex", Caesar The Fall of the Roman Republic to collect for himself all facets of constitutional authority, serving at the same time as dictator, as consul, The Fall of the Roman Republic Pontifex Maximus, and as Plebeian Tribune for life. He was murdered by a conspiracy of some 60 odd senators a few weeks later. At this point the precedent of rule by one man had been established at Rome. The only question remained which The Fall of the Roman Republic his supporters would most likely succeed him to this position. This turned out to be his great The Fall of the Roman Republic nephew, C. Julius C. Caesar Octavianus, or Octavian. Causes of the Political Decline:. Economic and Social Changes Consequent to Imperialism. Booty and profits of war. Roman overseas conquest resulted in too much wealth coming into Italy too quickly to enable equitable distribution throughout society. In general, wealthier elements benefited while lower elements failed to keep pace. In addition, rising expectations of profits from war led to abuses and illegal behavior by governors and generals in the field. The lex Calpurnia of BC established a permanent court for extortion in the The Fall of the Roman Republic. The prospect of profiting from war led to heightened competition for high office as well and extensive electoral bribery. Heightened Status of Roman Senators. The Roman aristocracy was now recognized as important world leaders. Senators and wealthy knights engaged in extensive practices of conspicuous consumption, creating palatial town houses and monumental "art villas" to demonstrate their high rank in society. The Equites or Knights emerged as a powerful social stratum in society in part because of their involvement in the public contracting that maintained the empire. Development of a slave agricultural economy in Italy and Sicily. Destruction of farmsteads throughout southern Italy by Hannibal led to a reorganization of the rural landscape toward larger estates run by slave laborers. Generally, reports indicate the development of medium sized estates for the purpose of producing wine and oil for export, a development demonstrated by the emergence of Italian transport amphoras as the dominant commercial export container of the western Mediterranean by the late second century BC. Some estates, known as latifundiacould be huge however. Many wealthy investors leased Roman The Fall of the Roman Republic publicus or public land, to developed cattle ranches, again worked by slaves. A conservative estimate suggests that somepersons forcibly migrated from the Mediterranean peripheries to the core regions of Italy and Sicily as a result of enslavement through conflict. Rome and neighboring Italian cities did not have sufficient police forces to monitor slave behavior. Living conditions for slaves were generally harsh and rebellions inevitable. Between BC a massive slave revolt seized control of the island of Sicily ; in BC a second revolt caused upheaval throughout Sicily and southern Italy ; in 72 BC came the famous slave rebellion of Spartacuswho led a sizeable army of slaves throughout the Italian peninsula, remaining undefeated until cornered by M. Licinius Crassus in 70 BC. Emergence of Rome as an imperial capital. Estimated population of Rome stood atby BC. Small farmers, both Roman and Italian, migrated to the capital in search of employment and cultural benefits, even though living conditions remained squalid for all but the wealthiest elements. As late as BC Rome reportedly only had 2 paved streets in the entire city. With profits of war Roman magistrates engaged in sustained building program to develop the necessary urban infrastructure -- roads, granaries, docks, aqueducts, etc. Thousands of slaves were imported to engage in artisan labor for the city. Urban development was made possible by the profits of war, but once Roman conflict ceased after BC, revenues declined, as did public contracting. Evidence of economic stagnation by the s BC, but now Rome had a large surplus population that could not return to the land because of the radical agricultural changes The Fall of the Roman Republic. Changes in the military. Conquest required maintenance of a permanent military establishment in the provinces to cope with rebellions. Roman authorities continued to rely on conscription to man overseas armies, but the prospect evolved for an 18 year old draftee to spend 16 to 20 years The Fall of the Roman Republic Italyall the while receiving minimum pay for military service. Little profit was to be gained from garrison duty in hostile regions such as Spain, Sardinia, and Corsica. Since the draft was based on the property assessments of the Roman census, abandonment of property resulted in decline in civic status and ineligibility for the draft. At the same time Italian allied states became increasingly called upon to sustain Rome's overseas military establishment. Allied states were required to contribute their native forces to Roman war efforts.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Backgrounds and Beginnings Early Republic: from Rome to Roman Italy
    HIS 354 Ruzicka The Roman Republic MHRA 2123 10-11 MWF 334-5488 [email protected] For many people “Rome” conjures up images of a vast empire and a series of autocratic and often deranged emperors. That is only part of the story of Roman history. An equally long and equally fascinating phase—that of the Roman Republic—preceded the age of emperors. It was in fact during this phase of Roman history that Rome became a big city, that the Romans took control of the Mediterranean world, and that Julius Caesar (not an emperor) lived. This course surveys this “republican” period of Roman history from the origins of Rome to the assassination of Julius Caesar--a period of more than seven centuries. The three major themes of the course are: 1) the development of Rome’s distinctive political institutions and practices, 2) the rise of Rome to rule over the entire Mediterranean world and 3) the changes wrought upon Roman society by Roman success. We will first examine the origins of Rome, the evolution of the Roman constitution, and the acquisition of Roman dominion over Italy (the Early Republic). Then, we will follow the story of Rome's rise to world power (the Middle Republic). Finally, we will trace the crises of Republican institutions as a result of the internal pressures generated by Roman responsibility for the Mediterranean world (the Late Republic). In a nutshell, we will be examining the rise and fall of the Roman Republic—a 500-year long story. There will be three examinations, each counting 25% of the final grade, and 3 papers (topics at end of syllabus), counting altogether 25% of the final grade.
    [Show full text]
  • Caesar and the Pirates: Or How to Make (And Break) an Ancient Life’, Greece and Rome, 57(2), Pp
    Georgetown University Institutional Repository http://www.library.georgetown.edu/digitalgeorgetown The author made this article openly available online. Please tell us how this access affects you. Your story matters. OSGOOD, J. (2010) ‘Caesar and The Pirates: or How to Make (and Break) an Ancient Life’, Greece and Rome, 57(2), pp. 319–336. doi: 10.1017/S0017383510000057 Collection Permanent Link: http://hdl.handle.net/10822/555438 © 2010 The Classical Association This material is made available online with the permission of the author, and in accordance with publisher policies. No further reproduction or distribution of this copy is permitted by electronic transmission or any other means. Greece & Rome, Vol. 57, No. 2, © The Classical Association, 2010. All rights reserved doi:10.1017/S0017383510000057 CAESAR AND THE PIRATES CAESAR AND THE PIRATES: OR HOW TO MAKE (AND BREAK) AN ANCIENT LIFE* Introduction It is hard for biographers, ancient and modern alike, to resist the story of the young Julius Caesar’s kidnapping by a band of pirates. Suetonius and Plutarch both include full versions of the tale, with specifi c details (Suet. Iul. 4; Plut. Vit. Caes. 1.4–2). Suetonius, for instance, writes that the kidnapping took place near the island of Pharmacusa (just off the coast of Asia Minor), while Plutarch, noting that too, also specifi es that the ransom that freed Caesar came from the (nearby) city of Miletus. And while Suetonius writes that Caesar, after his release, launched a fl eet, pursued the pirates, and punished them, Plutarch includes another phase in the story: having taken command of a fl eet and set sail (again, from Miletus), Plutarch’s Caesar captured nearly all the pirates but, instead of killing them right away, ‘he himself went to Iuncus, the governor of Asia, on the grounds that it belonged to him, as governor of the province, to punish the captives’.
    [Show full text]
  • A Fork in the Road: the Catilinarian Conspiracy's Impact
    A Fork in the Road: The Catilinarian Conspiracy‘s Impact on Cicero‘s relationships with Pompey, Crassus` and Caesar Jeffrey Larson History 499: Senior Thesis June 13, 2011 © Jeffrey Larson, 2011 1 But concerning friendship, all, to a man, think the same thing: those who have devoted themselves to public life; those who find their joy in science and philosophy; those who manage their own business free from public cares; and, finally, those who are wholly given up to sensual pleasures — all believe that without friendship life is no life at all. .1 The late Roman Republic was filled with crucial events which shaped not only the political environment of the Republic, but also altered the personal and political relationships of the individuals within that Republic. Four of the most powerful, and most discussed, characters of this time are Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 BC – 43 BC), Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus (106 BC – 48 BC), Marcus Licinius Crassus (c. 115 BC – 53 BC), and Gaius Julius Caesar (c. 100 BC – 44 BC). These men often crossed paths and some even had close friendships with each other. Other than Pompeius, better known as Pompey, all the aforementioned individuals were involved, or reportedly involved, in one event which had profound effects on the personal and political relationships of all four individuals. This event is known as the Catilinarian Conspiracy of 63 BC. The Catilinarian Conspiracy was a pivotal episode in the politics of the Late Roman Republic that damaged both the political and personal relationships of Cicero, Pompey, Crassus, and Caesar. Politics in the Roman Republic was dominated by a small number of members of the senatorial class.
    [Show full text]
  • CAESAR and NICOMEDES”, the Classical Quarterly, 58(2), Pp
    Georgetown University Institutional Repository http://www.library.georgetown.edu/digitalgeorgetown The author made this article openly available online. Please tell us how this access affects you. Your story matters. OSGOOD, J. (2008) “CAESAR AND NICOMEDES”, The Classical Quarterly, 58(2), pp. 687–691. doi: 10.1017/S0009838808000785 Collection Permanent Link: http://hdl.handle.net/10822/551722 © 2008 The Classical Association This material is made available online with the permission of the author, and in accordance with publisher policies. No further reproduction or distribution of this copy is permitted by electronic transmission or any other means. SHORTER NOTES 687 CAESAR AND NICOMEDES Around 80 B.C., as a young man of about twenty years, Julius Caesar left Rome to join the staff of M. Minucius Thermus in Asia for military training. Thermus was busy with the subjugation of Mytilene, the last of the cities of Asia to hold out against Rome after the recent war with Mithridates, and sent Caesar to fetch a fleet from King Nicomedes IV of Bithynia. Suetonius (Iul. 2) reports that Caesar dawdled at the royal court, so that a rumour crept up of sexual congress with the king (prostratae regi pudicitiae); and the rumour only grew when a few days after his mission was accomplished, Caesar returned to Bithynia ‘on the pretext of collecting money which was owed to a certain freedman, a client of his’ (per causam exigendae pecuniae, quae deberetur cuidam libertino clienti suo). Certainly, later in life the Roman was regularly accused of having shared the king’s bed, and in a remarkable chapter of his biography (Iul.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Continuity in Geto-Dacian Foreign Policy
    69 HIRUNDO 2008 Pattern of Continuity in Geto-Dacian Foreign Policy Under Burebista Paul Vădan Following the death of Alexander the Great, the ancient world was affected by prolonged po - litical turmoil as many states emerging after 323 BC, both within and without Alexander’s former Em - pire, sought to impose their regional hegemony at each other’s expense in an attempt to restore stability. In the context of such discourse in power politics, the Geto-Dacian state emerged and sought to assert itself in the Carpathian-Danubian-Pontic region under the rule of Burebista in the 1 st century BC. De - spite modern claims that Burebista’s achievements were without precedent in the history of Geto-Dacia, 1 this paper will attempt to place the rule of Burebista in the context of a long tradition of Geto-Dacian foreign policy of assertion and interaction with the Hellenistic οιкоυµένη (oikoumene the perceived Greek world as opposed to barbarian lands). In order to do this, we will need to analyze Burebista’s political and economic goals in order to determine whether his rule conformed to an established pattern. Unfortunately, such a project is ir - reparably flawed because no Geto-Dacian written accounts (if there were any) have survived; all that has been passed on to us in terms of literary “evidence” are approximately four hundred Geto-Dacian words that are still in use in the Romanian language. As a result, scholars are forced to appeal exclu - sively (and with caution) to Greek and Roman written sources if they are to construct a generally co - herent history of the Geto-Dacians.
    [Show full text]
  • ROME FOUNDED Biographies, Discussion Questions, Suggested Activities and More ANCIENT ROME Setting the Stage
    THIS DAY IN HISTORY STUDY GUIDE APR. 21, 753 B.C. : ROME FOUNDED Biographies, discussion questions, suggested activities and more ANCIENT ROME Setting the Stage Beginning in the eighth century B.C., Ancient Rome grew from a small town on central Italy’s Tiber River into an empire that at its peak encompassed most of continental Europe, Britain, much of western Asia, northern Africa and the Mediterranean islands. Among the many legacies of Roman dominance are the widespread use of the Romance languages (Italian, French, Spanish, Por- tuguese and Romanian) derived from Latin, the modern Western alphabet and calendar and the emergence of Christianity as a major world religion. After 450 years as a republic, Rome became an empire in the wake of Julius Caesar’s rise and fall in the fi rst century B.C. The long and triumphant reign of its fi rst emperor, Augustus, began a golden age of peace and prosperity. By contrast, the empire’s decline and fall by the fi fth century A.D. was one of the most dramatic implosions in the history of human civilization. About a thou- sand years after its founding, Rome collapsed under the weight of its own bloated empire, losing its provinces one by one: Britain around 410; Spain and northern Africa by 430. Attila and his brutal Huns invaded Gaul and Ita- ly around 450, further shaking the foundations of the empire. In September 476, a Germanic prince named Odovacar won control of the Roman army in Italy. After deposing the last western emperor, Romulus Augustus, Odovacar’s troops proclaimed him king of Italy, bringing an ignoble end to the long, tu- multuous history of ancient Rome.
    [Show full text]
  • Luxury at Rome: Avaritia, Aemulatio and the Mos Maiorum
    Roderick Thirkell White Ex Historia 117 Roderick Thirkell White1 University College London Luxury at Rome: avaritia, aemulatio and the mos maiorum This article sets out to put into perspective the ancient Roman discourse about luxury, which our extant literary sources almost universally condemn, on moral grounds. In it, I aim to define the scope and character of Roman luxury, and how it became an issue for the Romans, from the end of the third century BC to the beginning of the second century AD. With the aid of modern thinking about luxury and the diffusion of ideas in a society, I shed light on the reasons for the upsurge in luxurious living and, in particular, on how luxuries spread through the elite population, an issue that has been largely neglected by modern scholars. Books and articles on Roman luxury have been primarily concerned with examining the discourse of contemporary writers who criticised luxury;2 analysing the nature of Roman luxury;3 analysing the nature and impact of sumptuary legislation;4 or comparing the luxury of the Romans with that of other cultures.5 The only significant article dealing specifically with the diffusion of luxury is a provocative piece by Andrew Wallace-Hadrill, the focus of which is, however, limited and specific.6 For a series of moralising Roman authors, the second century BC saw the beginning of the corruption of the traditional stern moral fibre, as they saw it, of the Republic by an influx of 1 Roderick Thirkell White’s academic interests are concerned with aspects of the economy of the ancient world, primarily the late Roman Republic and Early Empire, with a focus on consumer and material culture.
    [Show full text]
  • From Rome to Roman Italy 8/21 Romans and Latins Vs
    HIS 354 Stephen Ruzicka The Roman Republic MHRA 2123 Office Hours TTH 11-12 334-5488 [email protected] For many people “Rome” conjures up images of a vast empire and a series of autocratic and often deranged emperors. That is only part of the story of Roman history. An equally long and equally fascinating phase—that of the Roman Republic—preceded the age of emperors. It was in fact during this phase of Roman history that Rome became a big city, that the Romans took control of the Mediterranean world, and that Julius Caesar (not an emperor) lived. This course surveys this “republican” period of Roman history from the origins of Rome to the assassination of Julius Caesar--a period of more than seven centuries. The three major themes of the course are: 1) the development of Rome’s distinctive political institutions and practices, 2) the rise of Rome to rule over the entire Mediterranean world and 3) the changes wrought upon Roman society by Roman success. We will first examine the origins of Rome, the evolution of the Roman constitution, and the acquisition of Roman dominion over Italy (the Early Republic). Then, we will follow the story of Rome's rise to world power (the Middle Republic). Finally, we will trace the crises of Republican institutions as a result of the internal pressures generated by Roman responsibility for the Mediterranean world (the Late Republic). In a nutshell, we will be examining the rise and fall of the Roman Republic—a 500-year long story. There will be three examinations, each counting 25% of the final grade, and 3 papers (topics at end of syllabus), counting altogether 25% of the final grade.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roman Slave Supply
    Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics The Roman slave supply Version 1.0 May 2007 Walter Scheidel Stanford University Abstract: This survey of the scale and sources of the Roman slave supply will be published in Keith Bradley and Paul Cartledge (eds.), The Cambridge world history of slavery, 1: The ancient Mediterranean world. © Walter Scheidel. [email protected] 1 I. Problems and methods Any reconstruction of the Roman slave supply depends on two variables: the total number of slaves, and the relative contribution of particular sources of slaves to overall supply. Due to the nature of the record, these issues are at best only dimly perceptible. A simple comparison with the history of US slavery highlights the severity of this predicament: decadal census counts not only record the number and distribution of slaves but also permit us to calculate rates of natural reproduction and even to assess the patterns of the domestic slave trade. This body of data gives us a good idea of the scale and development of the underlying slave system. In the study of the world history of slavery, by contrast, an evidentiary basis of this kind is the exception while uncertainty and guesswork are the norm. Roman slavery firmly belongs in the latter category: hardly any genuine statistics are available, and historians face two similarly unpalatable options. Thus, we may decide to eschew speculative quantification altogether and focus on what our sources readily provide – that is, qualitative impressions of the prevalence of slave-ownership and the provenance of slaves. This humanistic approach allows us to draw a rich canvas of slaveholdings large and small and of a variety of sources of supply from capture in war all the way to voluntary self-enslavement.
    [Show full text]
  • Pompey and the Special Command
    Pompey and the Special Command This image is in the public domain. Source: Wikimedia Commons. Gnaeus POMPEIUS Magnus (106-48 BC) 1 The Rise of Pompey • Joins Sulla in 83 BC • Special command against Carbo •Imperium pro praetore • Defeats Carbo and anti-Sullan opposition in 82 and 81 • Celebrates first Triumph at Rome, 81 • The adulescentulus carnifex This image is in the public domain. – ‘Youthful butcher’ (Val. Max. 6.2.8) Source: Wikimedia Commons. 2 Uprising of Lepidus 77 BC FAESULAE Pompey’s second special command: Propraetorian imperium - to help Catulus. © 2003 Ancient World Mapping Center. Released under CC BY -NC 3.0. 3 Sertorius in Spain 80-73 BC Pompey’s third special command: Proconsular imperium © 2003 Ancient World Mapping Center. Released under CC BY -NC 3.0. 4 Spartacus’ Slave Revolt 73-71 Pompey’s imperium extended © 2003 Ancient World Mapping Center. Released under CC BY -NC 3.0. 5 Pompey in Rome – 71 BC • Celebrates second Triumph • Wins consulship for 70 BC This image is in the public domain. Source: Wikimedia Commons. 6 Reforms of 70 BC 1. Full powers of the tribunes restored • By consular law of Pompey and Crassus 2. Juries to consist of members from three groups i. Senators ii. Equites iii. Tribuni aerarii iv. By praetorian law of L. Aurelius Cotta 7 Pompey in the 60s BC • 67: Special Command against pirates • Lex Gabinia • Imperium for three years • 144 mill. sest.; 500 ships; 125,000 men; 24 legati • 66: Special Command in the East • Lex Manilia • Cilicia, Bithynia, Pontus • Command against Mithridates • Settlement in 63 BC • Third Triumph at Rome in 61 BC 8 © 2003 Ancient World Mapping Center .
    [Show full text]
  • 354-01 Ruzicka
    HIS 354 Stephen Ruzicka The Roman Republic MHRA 2123 Office Hours TTH 11-12 334-5488 [email protected] For many people “Rome” conjures up images of a vast empire and a series of autocratic and often deranged emperors. That is only part of the story of Roman history. An equally long and equally fascinating phase—that of the Roman Republic—preceded the age of emperors. It was in fact during this phase of Roman history that Rome became a big city, that the Romans took control of the Mediterranean world, and that Julius Caesar (not an emperor) lived. This course surveys this “republican” period of Roman history from the origins of Rome to the assassination of Julius Caesar--a period of more than seven centuries. The three major themes of the course are: 1) the development of Rome’s distinctive political institutions and practices, 2) the rise of Rome to rule over the entire Mediterranean world and 3) the changes wrought upon Roman society by Roman success. We will first examine the origins of Rome, the evolution of the Roman constitution, and the acquisition of Roman dominion over Italy (the Early Republic). Then, we will follow the story of Rome's rise to world power (the Middle Republic). Finally, we will trace the crises of Republican institutions as a result of the internal pressures generated by Roman responsibility for the Mediterranean world (the Late Republic). In a nutshell, we will be examining the rise and fall of the Roman Republic—a 500-year long story. There will be three examinations, each counting 25% of the final grade, and 3 papers (topics at end of syllabus), counting altogether 25% of the final grade.
    [Show full text]
  • 09 Artikel-Tot Pg
    TALANTA XXXII-XXXIII (2000-2001) BOSPORUS ON THE VERGE OF THE CHRISTIAN ERA (OUTLINES OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT) Sergei Saprykin Generally it was believed that the Bosporan Kingdom suffered a deep social and economic crisis starting in the late 2nd-early 1st century BC. This became much worse after its incorporation into the Pontic Kingdom in the reign of Mithridates VI Eupator in ca. 110-107 BC, and continued until the second half of the 1st century AD. Apparently, the crisis came to an end with the establishment of a local Sarmatian dynasty at Panticapaeum. There is much archaeological evidence on which this conclusion can be based, as well as evidence from the ancient authors. They testify to the devastation and destruction of sites in both the European and Asiatic Bosporus. The ruination of some buildings in cities such as Myrmekion and Panticapaeum was also identified. The time span for the destruction was estimated to be late 2nd century BC-1st century AD, which encompasses all the events con - nected with Mithridatic rule of the Bosporus, the fight of Pharnaces I for his ancestral domain, the struggle between Asander and Mithridates of Pergamum, the rule of Polemo I of Pontus there, his struggle with the Aspurgians, the coming to power of Aspurgus, and the conflict of Mithridates VIII (III of Bosporus) with Rome. Thereafter, as the popular interpretation has it, something of a revival took place in the political, eco - nomic and social life of the Bosporus thanks to Sarmatian influence in all spheres of Bosporan society. This interpretation was long dominant; some still follow it (Gaidukevich 1949, 320-84; cf.
    [Show full text]