Heritage Assessment
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Comments from Heritage New Zealand
Comment on the Kohimarama Comprehensive Care Retirement Village Fast Track Application 1. Contact Details Please ensure that you have authority to comment on the application on behalf of those named on this form. Organisation name (if relevant) Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga *First name Susan *Last name Andrews Postal address PO Box 105 291, Auckland City 1143 *Home phone / Mobile phone 027 202 3935 *Work phone 09 307 9940 *Email (a valid email address [email protected] enables us to communicate efficiently with you) 2. *We will email you draft conditions of consent for your comment about this application I can receive emails and my email address is I cannot receive emails and my postal address is ✓ correct correct 3. Please provide your comments on the Kohimarama Comprehensive Care Retirement Village Application If you need more space, please attach additional pages. Please include your name, page numbers and Kohimarama Comprehensive Care Retirement Village Application on the additional pages. Kohimarama Comprehensive Care Retirement Village Page 3 of 7 1. Archaeology The archaeological assessment of the subject site prepared by Clough & Associates in 2015, updated in August 2019, appears not to consider the possibility that terraces (which they identify as natural) located within the south western portion of the site may be an extension of archaeological site R11/1196 (terraces with a stone artefact) and that subsurface archaeological remains relating to Maori settlement on the terraces may be present. (See New Zealand Archaeological Authority ArchSite database extract and annotated 1940 aerial below). Kohimarama Comprehensive Care Retirement Village Page 4 of 7 This possible connection was established following a survey of the site completed by Russell Foster in September 2015 for an assessment for the Glen Innes to Tamaki Drive Shared Path1, which resulted in relocation of R11/1196, previously located some 170 metres to the south of the subject property, to a location now only 70 metres south of the subject property. -
Waterfront-Course-Map-21K.Pdf
de W Auckland Devonport to Rangitoto Island Devonport Wharf Bean Rock Waiheke A uckl a nd - W a ihek e Ferry e Fe Waihek Auckland - Auckland r t ry o Pineharbour Devonpor akapuna Auckland to Coromandel t -T West Bastion Auckland to Coromandel y Reef Auckland to Pineharbour Auckland - Half Moon Bay East Bastion Reef START LINE TAMAKI DRIVE HALF MARATHON COURSE MAP 11 FINISH LINE 12 km SELWYN RESERVE km Orakei Wharf rive i D k 1 a km m Ta 7 Takaparawhau a St an r pi m eet Michael Point Ha Joseph Savage 9 Memorial km Park 7 Selwyn Domain ay 6 Ta Okahu w Tamaki ma le Dr ive Cycleway ki 16 yc Tamaki D Dri Bay e C v temata km mak i Driv e i Ta 20 Judges a Selwyn Av rive Gl 5 W Mar TURNAROUND #2 km a au d C t e s Bay r km escent esce n nue ton Orakei 10 Marau Cr FIRST LAP TURNAROUND #1 Marina km e e Ro FIRST LAP 13 2 t Mission Bay Eltham Road a e Kohimarama 19 e 7 d km km r ve t Avenu 18 ri 17 km S Tagal ad Road Beach i D n k a km Ronaki Road km a n m a so a venue o T A 14 3 e T oad 6 e Cyc am R iv lew T aki Dri km km ay em Rukutai Str ar ve Cyc t y Dr i anaki Road TURNAROUND #4 a Bridge ki Tamaki Patt gate Road a K Road l eet B Dr 8 15 d s 4 m ive tr wa a a e S g T 7 km km Ho o SECOND LAP d nue R e Ju te km ad e v r Road nt lwick T l v o Ku ama S ri aur Watene esce p W u Auckland ee ill Cr A e mar D eet Ni h N C i i a p h g Saint Stephens n o ar t ihil ht Road en Reserve e Str K Hanene e t u C Sage R Cr Ta Ta i Drive re l Cr The a s Long a T e m m it cent s r Titai Str t Reihana Str eet t escent c a a 7 Selwy a e eet Rota Place e ki ki D e -
Newsletterauckland Manukau Eastern Transport Initiative
Capturing Panmure’s past About the AMETI transport projects As AMETI progresses and the Panmure area is transformed, we take a look back at the history The Auckland Manukau Eastern Transport Initiative (AMETI) is a group of transport projects of one of Auckland’s first settlements….. for the south east (Panmure, Mt Wellington, Pakuranga, Howick and Botany). Key North south road NewsletterAuckland Manukau Eastern Transport Initiative. AMETI October 2013 Phase 1 Panmure Merton Rd extension l North/South Rd l New Panmure Station A p i The University of r Auckland a n Phase 2 Panmure to Pakuranga a Makeover for historic lagoon A l New Panmure Intersection Quarry v e l Busway Lagoon Dr & Pakuranga Rd Stonefields Link Rd l New Panmure Bridge Work gets underway on a major makeover for a forgotten corner of Panmure. M l New Reeves Rd Flyover orr i n R d A forgotten and neglected historic corner of Panmure Watercare is also carrying out a stormwater Future developments is getting a major makeover as part of one of Auckland’s pipe upgrade. South Eastern Connections biggest transport projects. Study Just off Mt Wellington Highway, Van Damme’s Lagoon New north-south road Pillkington Rd H obson Work is underway on upgrading and has been through a number of changes in its history. Panmure Station St s new bus/rail D re unn C revitalising Van Damme’s Lagoon and reserve Rd es interchange Mo Coat un (story continues on page three) ta in Gre as part of AMETI. E R en Rd llersl d ie Pan mu re Jellicoe Rd Hwy Pleas New Panmure ant V Mt Wellington iew Mt Wellington intersection Shopping Centre Panmure to Pakuranga y Ellerslie-Panmure Highway Bridge opens w d Major milestone – R north side busway H and Panmure n el L o r a t I g o o lling e n W D In 1841, the government purchased what was then known More than 2500 men, women and children arrived in t r M as the Kohimarama block from Ngati Paoa. -
Otahuhu Historic Heritage Survey
OTAHUHU HISTORIC HERITAGE SURVEY Overview Report PREPARED FOR AUCKLAND COUNCIL BY MATTHEWS & MATTHEWS ARCHITECTS LTD IN ASSOCIATION WITH LYN WILLIAMS LISA TRUTTMAN BRUCE W HAYWARD CLOUGH & ASSOCIATES LTD JP ADAM RA SKIDMORE URBAN DESIGN LTD FINAL August 2014 OTAHUHU HISTORIC HERITAGE SURVEY 2013 Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Brief .................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 The Study area ................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Methodology and Approach .............................................................................. 5 1.4 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................... 5 1.5 Overview of report structure and component parts ........................................... 7 2.0 ŌTĀHUHU STUDY AREA-SUMMARY OF HISTORIC HERITAGE ISSUES ....... 9 2.1 Built Heritage Overview and recommendations ................................................ 9 2.2 Overview and recommendations in relation to geology .................................. 12 2.3 Overview and recommendations in relation to archaeology ........................... 13 2.4 Overview and recommendations Landscape History ...................................... 13 2.5 Overview and recommendations related to Maori Ancestral Relationships and issues identified. .................................................................................................. -
Tamaki Yacht Club at Bastion Point, Orākei - Request for Comment from Te Runanga O Ngati Whatua
10/30/2019 Gmail - Tamaki Yacht Club at Bastion Point, Orākei - request for comment from Te Runanga o Ngati Whatua Ross Roberts <[email protected]> Tamaki Yacht Club at Bastion Point, Orākei - request for comment from Te Runanga o Ngati Whatua 1 message Ross Roberts <[email protected]> 30 October 2019 at 17:05 To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected], Tamaki <[email protected]> Tēnā koutou, I am Ross Roberts, the Commodore of Tamaki Yacht Club. A a keen sailor from England, I moved to New Zealand in 2008 to enjoy the fantastic marine environment in Auckland which is world-renowned for its sailing. When not sailing I work as an engineering geologist trying to manage the social and environmental effects of natural processes such as landslides and volcanic eruptions. I am writing to start a discussion with you about possible future plans for Tamaki Yacht Club, the sailing club at Bastion Point between Mission Bay and Ōkahu Bay. Tamaki Yacht Club was founded around the time that Tamaki Drive was opened in 1932, and has been a centre for small sailing yachts ever since. We are a small club that is mainly used by more experienced sailors for casual racing, because the slipway is quite exposed so the club is not particularly well suited for learners. The clubhouse was built when the club was founded, and was slightly expanded in 1972 at the front, in the former location of a gun turret that protected the entrance to the Waitematā during the war. -
Tamaki Drive Walking Trail Existing Signage Audit
Tamaki Drive Walking Trail Existing Signage Audit Start at The Landing Okahu Bay – Western Entrance to Achilles Point via Michael Joseph Savage Memorial (Direction: West to East) Site & Sign Ref No. The Landing Okahu Bay – Western Entrance, Orakei Marina (Image) Tamaki Drive The large sign is located in Orakei Marina before the Auckland Sailing Club on Section 1_xx Section 1.1 The Tamaki Drive. It is placed on the western entrance of the Orakei Marina. This is Landing Okahu Bay an informational sign coloured in blue (re-branded by the Auckland Council). It is located on the ground off the footpath. The sign is double sided with the same information in both sides. The pictures are shown below. The orange rectangle indicates the location of the sign. Existing signage The sign is in an excellent condition. Different branding to other existing signs (comment) as the colour is light blue instead of dark green. Enhancements / The sign is in an excellent condition. No repair needed. additions / repairs needed Site & Sign Ref No. The Landing Okahu Bay – map (Image) Tamaki Drive The sign is located in Orakei Marina before the Auckland Sailing Club on Tamaki Section 1_xx Section 1.1 The Drive. This is an informational sign coloured in blue. The location of this map is Landing Okahu Bay on the parking entrance on the west part of The Landing Okahu. It is located on the ground off the footpath. The sign is double sided with the same information in both sides. The pictures are shown below. The orange rectangle indicates the location of the sign. -
Part 2 Present and Future Trends
PART 2 - CONTENTS PART 2 PRESENT AND FUTURE TRENDS 2.1 THE FORM OF HOWICK 2.2 GROWTH OF HOWICK 2.3 ETHNIC ORIGIN OF POPULATION 2.4 EMPLOYMENT 2.5 DWELLINGS AND RESIDENTIAL BUILDING 2.6 CONTEXT OF THE PLANNING SCHEME HOWICK THIRD REVIEW PART 2 - PRESENT AND FUTURE TRENDS 2.1 THE FORM OF HOWICK 111 Howick settlement has existed since 1847 and is today a well established residential suburb. It is located on the shores of the Hauraki Gulf, approximately eleven kilometres north of Manukau City Centre, at the perimeter of the urban area. The Hutchinson Road and Bradbury Road ridges define the western boundary of the district. Continuing from the latter ridge is the topographical backbone of Howick, the ridge which the main road follows, with its high points at Stockade Hill and Minerva Terrace. On the seaward side, a series of ridges and valleys slope toward the cost. A number of these are marked by streams with considerable tree cover. On the landward side, the main ridge forms a basin with a southward orientation which drains to the Tamaki River. The hilly topography has had a strong effect on the roading network with many roads following the ridges. It also means that most parts of the District can enjoy views either of the sea, the countryside or of a suburban landscape. Three major factors have made Howick an attractive residential location. First, the considerable length of north-east facing coastline and beaches backed by sloping land with extensive views to the islands of the gulf. -
2 Tamaki Drive Precinct Scope
Tamaki Drive Precinct Event Guidelines Ōrākei Local Board Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 4 2 Tamaki Drive Precinct scope ........................................................................................ 5 3 Event permit requirements ............................................................................................ 6 4 Roles and Responsibilities ............................................................................................ 6 5 St Heliers Bay Reserve: Vellenoweth Green ................................................................. 7 6 Local Consultation ......................................................................................................... 7 7 Local suppliers and traders ........................................................................................... 8 8 Tamaki Drive Precinct road closures ............................................................................. 8 9 Events involving planned noise ..................................................................................... 9 10 Signage ......................................................................................................................... 9 Appendix 1 – Event facilitation process ............................................................................. 11 Appendix 2 – Facilitation stakeholders............................................................................... 13 Appendix -
Intertidal Life of the Tamaki Estuary and Its Entrance, Auckland July 2005 TP373
Intertidal Life of the Tamaki Estuary and its Entrance, Auckland July 2005 TP373 Auckland Regional Council Technical Publication No. 373, 2008 ISSN 1175-205X(Print) ISSN 1178-6493 (Online) ISBN 978-1-877483-47-9 Intertidal life of the Tamaki Estuary and its Entrance, Auckland Bruce W. Hayward1 Margaret S. Morley1,2 1Geomarine Research, 49 Swainston Rd, St Johns, Auckland 2c/o Auckland War Memorial Museum, Private Bag 92 018, Auckland Prepared for Auckland Regional Council Envrionmental Research 2005 The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Auckland Regional Council Approved for ARC publication by: _____________________________ Grant Barnes 21 July 2008 Recommended Citation: Hayward, B. W; Morley, M.S (2005). Intertidal life of the Tamaki Estuary and its entrance, Auckland. Prepared for Auckland Regional Council. Auckland Regional Council Technical Publication Number 373. 72p Contents 1 Executive Summary 1 2 Introduction 3 2.1 Study Area 3 2.2 Rock Types Along the Shore 6 2.3 Origin and Shape of the Tamaki Estuary 6 2.4 Previous Work 7 2.4.1 Ecological Surveys 7 2.4.2 Introduced Species 7 2.4.3 Environmental Pollution 8 2.4.4 Geology 9 2.5 Tamaki Estuary Steering Committee 9 3 Methodology 10 3.1 Survey Methodology 10 3.2 Biodiversity and Specimens 10 4 Intertidal Habitats and Communities 11 4.1 Salt Marsh and Salt Meadow 11 4.2 Mangrove Forest 11 4.3 Seagrass Meadows 12 4.4 Sublittoral Seaweed Fringe 12 4.5 Estuarine Mud 12 4.6 Shelly Sand Flats 12 4.7 Shell Banks and Spits -
DISTRICT PLAN ISTHMUS SECTION - OPERATIVE 1999 Page 1 Updated 29/02/2012 APPENDIX 1
APPENDIX 1 SCHEDULE OF BUILDINGS, OBJECTS, HERITAGE PROPERTIES OR PLACES OF SPECIAL VALUE AND THOSE SUBJECT TO HERITAGE ORDERS Plan change annotations - key Indicates where content is affected by proposed plan modification x. x Refer to plan modification folder or website for details. Indicates where the content is part of plan modification x, which is x subject to appeal. Underlined content to be inserted. Struck through content to be deleted. CITY OF AUCKLAND - DISTRICT PLAN ISTHMUS SECTION - OPERATIVE 1999 Page 1 updated 29/02/2012 APPENDIX 1 CITY OF AUCKLAND - DISTRICT PLAN Page 2See key on page 1 ISTHMUS SECTION - OPERATIVE 1999 of this section updated 29/02/2012 APPENDIX 1 SCHEDULE OF BUILDINGS, OBJECTS, HERITAGE PROPERTIES OR PLACES OF SPECIAL VALUE, AND THOSE SUBJECT TO HERITAGE ORDERS. Note: Cat = Category Int = Interior Sur = Surrounds * = The site surround dimensions and/or interior definitions are listed at the back of this schedule. For an explanation of the categories, criteria for listing and rules refer Part 5C.7.1 BUILDINGS, OBJECTS, HERITAGE PROPERTIES AND PLACES OF SPECIAL VALUE THIS SCHEDULE DOES NOT INCLUDE PROTECTED ITEMS IN THE CENTRAL AREA OR THE HAURAKI GULF ISLANDS Note: This schedule is not the same as the New Zealand Historic Places Register for Auckland. It is a separate but parallel protection process. The District Plan list is in response to the Resource Management Act, and the New Zealand Historic Places Register is in response to the Historic Places Act. Since a heritage place may appear in either or both lists, care should be taken to ascertain and fulfill any obligations deriving from the place being included in either or both lists. -
Report of the Waitangi Tribunal on the Orakei Claim (Wai-9)
Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Report of The Waitangi Tribunal on The Orakei Claim (Wai-9) November 1987 BROOKER & FRIEND LTD WELLINGTON Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Cover design by Cliff Whiting National Library of New Zealand Cataloguing-in-publication Data NEW ZEALAND. Waitangi Tribunal. Orakei report : report of the Waitangi Tribunal on the Orakei claim (Wai-9).—Wellington, NZ. The Tribunal, 1987.—1 v.—(Waitangi Tribunal reports, 0113–4124 ;1) “November 1987” 1. Maoris—Land Tenure. 2. Land tenure–New Zealand–Orakei–History. 3. Waitangi, Treaty of, 1840. 4. Bastion Point (NZ)–History. I. Title. II. Series : Waitangi Tribunal reports ; 1. Waitangi Tribunal Reports ISBN 0–86472–084-X First published in November 1987 by The Waitangi Tribunal Department of Justice Wellington, New Zealand Reprinted with minor corrections 1991 ©1987 Crown copyright Orakei Report (Wai 9) ISBN 0–86472–084-X Reprint typeset, printed and bound by Brooker and Friend Ltd Wellington, New Zealand Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz The clouds in yonder horizon Across the sea, are playing with The winds, whilst I am here Yearning and weeping for my son–Ah ! he’s More than a son to me ; He’s my heart’s blood . Te Kawau Orakei 19 December 1853 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Hon K T Wetere Minister of Maori Affairs Parliament Buildings WELLINGTON Te Minita Maori Te Rangatira tena koe. Tatari tonu koe i te ao, e te po. -
Before the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel
BEFORE THE AUCKLAND UNITARY PLAN INDEPENDENT HEARINGS PANEL IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (Act) AND IN THE MATTER of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2013 AND Auckland Council IN THE MATTER of the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan Topic 081 SUBMISSIONS OF COUNSEL FOR SAVE OUR ST HELIERS INC AND ST HELIERS / GLENDOWIE RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION INC (SOS) 09 MARCH 2016 Counsel Acting Rob Enright Barrister Level 1, Northern Steamship Building 122 Quay Street Britomart Auckland 1010 e: [email protected] m: +64 21 276 5787 MAY IT PLEASE THE INDEPENDENT HEARINGS PANEL INTRODUCTION 1 Save Our St Heliers and the St Heliers / Glendowie Residents Assoc (SOS) wish to present a focused case to you. The key issue is the height of buildings. SOS seeks a 9m height limit, above which discretionary consent is required. St Heliers is a “coherent town centre of predominantly single and two storied commercial buildings”. 1 A 9m height limit reflects this. Construction above this height is not precluded, but should be subject to discretionary consent status, including usual rules as to notification. 2 Related to the height issue are Policies and Methods that maintain and enhance character. SOS does not have a fixed or static view of St Heliers’ character. Sympathetic and appropriate change is envisaged. The issue is not change per se, but rather “what is appropriate”. The question does not need to be asked in a vaccuum. Illustrative examples of “what not to do” already exist. These will be addressed today by SOS’s experts. Examples of “what doesn’t work” support SOS’s contention that 9m (and 2-storeys) is the right height control.