DOCSLIB.ORG

Foundations of Modern American City Planning

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FOUNDATIONS OF MODERN AMERICAN CITY PLANNING Most historians agree that modern American city planning began in the late 1800’s. Some affix the date to 1893 and the Columbian Exposition in Chicago, though there is less orthodoxy regarding this moment than 15 years ago. In contrast to the earlier Colonial planning period (Philadelphia, Savannah, Williamsburg, etc.) wherein plans preceded development, planning in the 1800s generally responded to the urbanization stimulated by the industrial revolution in existing and haphazardly developing cities. The American Industrial Revolution occurred in two waves, the first in 1820-1870 and the second in 1870-1920. The U.S. grew from 7% urban in 1820 to 25% urban in 1870 and 50% urban in 1920. Several social movements categorized as precursors to modern American city planning (public health, sanitary reform, settlement house and housing reform, parks planning) responded to the challenges and consequences of chaotic urbanization prior to modern planning’s beginnings. The City Beautiful movement was a fifth response at about the same time that modern planning began. The Garden Cities Movement simultaneously commenced in England and was imported soon after. American planning grew out of and hoped to provide a broader, more comprehensive vision to these movements. Five interrelated and overlapping 1. Sanitary Reform Movement movements of the 19th Century have 2. Parks Planning/Parks Systems Movement profound effect on the first half of 3. Settlement House/Housing Reform Movement the 20th Century 4. Garden City Movement 5. City Beautiful Movement Movement Attributes Sanitary Reform (extensive overlap An outgrowth and response to the accelerating with and sometimes referred to as urbanization of the U.S. Accompanied by an the Public Health Movement) 1840‐ an increasingly scientific understanding of 1890. Sanitary Reform’s focus was infectious diseases ‐ from filth theory to germ infrastructure and Public Health was theory. primarily concerned with preventing and contending with infectious Primary foci: diseases and epidemics. 1.Water supply 2. Water carriage sewerage to supplant private lot waste removal. 3. Sanitary survey planning: detailed examination of diseases and associated physical conditions. Memphis/American Public Health Association/ National Board of Health 1878‐1880 4. Townsite consciousness‐not a systematic doctrine but increased awareness and sensitivity to topography, drainage, water supply, parks, crowding, density, gross land use conflicts (slaughter houses in residential areas) Parks Planning/Parks Systems Movement Initially focused on a “large, romantic pleasure Grounds”‐offered middle and upper class Americans 'the equivalent of a day in the country.' Examples: Central Park (NY), Franklin Park (Boston), Lincoln Park (Chicago). Later evolved into the conception of city‐wide, eventually regional interconnected systems of parks and parkways. Significant events in: Horace W. S. Cleveland, Minneapolis park system proposal 1883; Minneapolis‐St. Paul regional Park system proposal, 1887 (Minneapolis implemented) George W. Kessler, Kansas City city‐wide system of parks and boulevards, 1893 (multiple other players: Augustus Robert Dyer (wealthy business person), James Pendergrast (political boss) Thomas Swope, (philanthropist) Charles Eliot, Sylvester Baxter, Boston ‐extensive regional park system (1891‐1893 and beyond) Settlement House Movement/Housing Sought to contribute to urban reform through Reform living (settling) in poor, frequently immigrant or minority neighborhoods and mobilizing resources for social change. Emphasis on "learning by doing" social action (John Dewey, Jane Addams) 1886‐19teens. Significant personalities/events: Jane Addams, Hull House, Chicago Mary K. Simkovitch, College Settlement, Friendly Aid House, Greenwich House, of New York (all NY City), helped organize the first National Conference on City Planning. New York Association of Neighborhood Workers, Cooperative Social Settlement Society of the City Jacob Riis ("How the Other Half Lives" (1890), "Children of the Poor" (1892)) and Benjamin Marsh were allied activists. Garden City Movement ‐ England The Garden City Movement began with the work of Ebenezer Howard "Tomorrow: A Peaceful Path to Real Reform" (1898). Garden City Characteristics: 1. satellite garden cities surrounding central garden city, each city being essentially self‐supporting relying on the central city only for regional facilities 2. finite population: ultimate population could not be expanded, thus preventing deteriorating sprawl at its edges 3. surrounded by greenbelts and woods of public land to be used permanently as agriculture and open space 4. included concept of land rent Howard carried out two garden city projects in England. 1. Letchworth (1903‐1920) 2. Welwyn (1919‐1934) Development of Second City ‐ Welwyn (1919) 1. designed by Louis de Soissons 2. to have population of 40,000 3. far more successful than Letchworth because location allowed workers to travel to London and those living in London to work in Welwyn 4. designed with superblock street scheme Garden City Movement in U. S. Garden City Movement (England) exerted some influence in U.S. in the teens and 1920's: 1. Forest Hills Gardens (160 acres) Russell Sage Foundation (1909) Frederick Law Olmstead, Jr. ‐a Garden suburb not a full fledged "new town" 2. Radburn, NJ (1929) (Henry Wright and Clarence Stein) adopted updated elements of the Garden City approach: residences in superblocks(30‐50 acres) penetrated only by cul‐de‐sacs, separated pedestrian and vehicular traffic, faced homes toward gardens, reserved the interiors of superblocks for parks, connected the superblocks by a system of walks with underpasses under the motorways. Lacked full range of land uses to be a new town 3. U.S. impact was a more complete vision of suburban residential planning and an aspiration or recognition of the much more complete new‐towns or satellite garden cities alternatives. City Beautiful Movement Began with the Columbian Expostion (1893), Chicago Key Actors: Daniel Burnham, Frederick Law Olmsted Sr., Charles McKim, Augustus St. Gaudens, First example in U.S. of great group of buildings designed in relation to one another and in relation to open spaces “White City” team could not agree on color scheme, painted it all white Daniel Burnham justified subsequent City Beautiful plan on grounds that: 1. the beauty of public works that attract the wealthy makes pleasant the life of the poor, are accessible to all men, and create a unifying civic pride 2. the attraction of those with wealth creates a flow of money that filters down to all citizens 3. creation of broad tree‐lined avenues brings light, air, and nature to the slums City Beautiful Contributions of the City Beautiful Movement: 1. Helped revival of city planning/a central element in modern American planning. Helped lead to planning's establishment as permanent part of local government. 2. led to the professional consultant role for "planning experts" 3. Progressive Movement added the quasi‐independent planning commissions composed of citizens Deficiencies of the Movement: 1. Insufficient response to the wide range of problems precipitated by urbanization. Dealt with peripheral and aesthetic issues not the fundamental issues of class, health, governance, environment, housing, and, and, and, … 2. catered primarily to an upper class constituency 3. treated issues affecting poor people superficially or not at all 4. beautification and adornment had limited practicality for many cities 5. lack of legitimation of any public control over the private actions that were decisive in setting the quality of urban environment 6. emphasis on parks and boulevards required public investment rather than controls Decline of the Movement in the 1920's 1. Accommodation to automobiles required substantial energy and resources 2. Immediacies of municipal governance moderated interest in visionary utopian concepts. related to City Beautiful projects Although City Beautiful declined, its emphasis on physical site planning was internalized in planning efforts regulating the development of the suburbs. Planning in Transition During the 19‐teens, U.S. planning focused more on physical/engineering/infrastructure issues and began to adapt zoning from the German model (without importing the cooperative housing, public land owner‐ ship and innovations in municipal finance which were integral to the German urban policy framework). The U.S. Progressive (political) Movement emphasized professionalization of civil service and (naively) tried to depoliticize elements of local governance through appointed boards and commissions such as planning commissions. City Efficient Rise of City Efficient‐ 1920s 1. new emphasis of cities and American City Planning Institute on technical details of city planning brought civil engineers, lawyers, and administrators to the fore‐ front replacing architects and landscape architects 2. housing reformers and settlement house people's roles were diminished and they focused on issues out‐ side the narrowing definition of planning 3. advent of the automobile required major public works projects which drew attention away from many civic building projects 4. new laws and court cases being developed resulted in land use, zoning, land subdivision control and admin‐ istrative/regulative devices replacing "civic center" design as the focus of planning activities Summary prepared from Laurence C. Gerckens, American City Planning Since 1900 A.D. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, 1975. Modified by Larry Keating, FAICP, 2009 .
Recommended publications
  • Early 'Urban America'

    Early 'Urban America'

    CCAPA AICP Exam Presentation Planning History, Theory, and Other Stuff Donald J. Poland, PhD, AICP Senior VP & Managing Director, Urban Planning Goman+York Property Advisors, LLC www.gomanyork.com East Hartford, CT 06108 860-655-6897 [email protected] A Few Words of Advice • Repetitive study over key items is best. • Test yourself. • Know when to stop. • Learn how to think like the test writers (and APA). • Know the code of ethics. • Scout out the test location before hand. What is Planning? A Painless Intro to Planning Theory • Rational Method = comprehensive planning – Myerson and Banfield • Incremental (muddling through) = win little battles that hopefully add up to something – Charles Lindblom • Transactive = social development/constituency building • Advocacy = applying social justice – Sherry Arnstein’s Ladder of Public Participation – Paul Davidoff – advocacy planning American Planning before 1800 • European Traditions – New England, New Amsterdam, & the village tradition – Tidewater and the ‘Town Acts’ – The Carolinas/Georgia and the Renaissance Style – L’Enfant, Washington D.C., & Baroque Style (1791) • Planning was Architectural • Planning was plotting street layouts • There wasn’t much of it… The 1800’s and Planning Issues • The ‘frontier’ is more distant & less appealing • Massive immigration • Industrialization & Urbanization • Problems of the Industrial City – Poverty, pollution, overcrowding, disease, unrest • Planning comes to the rescue – NYC as epicenter – Central Park 1853 – 1857 (Olmsted & Vaux) – Tenement Laws Planning Prior to WWI • Public Awareness of the Problems – Jacob Riis • ‘How the Other Half Lives’ (1890) • Exposed the deplorable conditions of tenement house life in New York City – Upton Sinclair • ‘The Jungle’ (1905) – William Booth • The Salvation Army (1891) • Solutions – Zoning and the Public Health Movement – New Towns, Garden Cities, and Streetcar Suburbs – The City Beautiful and City Planning Public Health Movement • Cities as unhealthy places – ‘The Great Stink’, Cholera, Tuberculosis, Alcoholism….
  • Garden Cities Located in What Now Are the Suburbs of Berlin

    Garden Cities Located in What Now Are the Suburbs of Berlin

    focus | 2009 | volume VI 53 GAR D EN CITIES: LESSONS FROM GERMANY Kar L ECKE R T Karl Eckert is a senior at Ebenezer Howard’s lessons and the Garden City movement spread throughout Europe the BCRP program, City between the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th. In this article, Karl Eckert and Regional Planning Department, Cal Poly. discusses the origins of the movement and the translation of the concept to Germany. During a recent trip, he visited and studied tSiemensstadt and Britz, two garden cities located in what now are the suburbs of Berlin. In reading the book Cities of Tomorrow by Sir Peter Hall, one comes to realize the profession of planning is a relatively new field of expertise. Modern day city planning stems from the early 1900’s when the societies of the developing world were dealing with the menace of the urban slum, a new phenomenon spurred by industrial forces and a rise in migratory populations to major city centers for employment. Developing ideas that would counter-attack this dire urban condition would soon define and establish what is known today as city planning. Life in the Slums Peter Hall’s Cities of Tomorrow elaborates on how, during the period of 1880 to 1920, major cities such as London, Berlin, Paris and New York experienced complications with slum populations. These cities exhibited high concentrations of poor residents within areas defined by the lack of physical maintenance, crowded conditions, disregard for sanitation, and general social decline. Andrew Figure 1 Mearns, a pamphlet writer of the time, described the slums of London with clarity: The Siemens factory, which was the main employment outlet “Few who read these pages have any conception of what these pestilential human rookeries for those living in are, where tens of thousands are crowded together amidst horrors which call to mind what we Seimensstadt.
  • 2010 CNU Charter Awards Book

    2010 CNU Charter Awards Book

    TENTH ANNIVERSARY CONGRESS FOR THE NEW URBANISM CHARTER 0 1 0 CNUAWARD S 2 It is with great pleasure that we present the results of the first CNU JACKY GRIMSHAW Charter Awards Program…The , Vice-President of Policy, Center for Neighborhood Technology, Chicago, Illinois; diversity of architectural design ELIZABETH MOULE , Principal, Moule Polyzoides approaches demonstrates that it Architects & Urbanists, Pasadena, California; is possible to seamlessly link new PAUL MURRAIN , Urban Designer and INTBAU Visiting development to its surroundings Professor at the University of Greenwich, London, in many ways. England; JOE DISTEFANO , Principal, Calthorpe Ray Gindroz, Jury Chair 2001 Associates, Berkeley, California: MAGGIE CONNOR , Principal, Urban Design Associates, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; VINCE GRAHAM , JURY CHAIR , Founder, I’On Group, Charleston, South Carolina; DANA BEACH , Executive Director, Coastal Conservation League, Charleston, South Carolina 2010 MARKS THE TENTH YEAR OF THE CHARTER AWARDS. I had the honor of chairing a jury which included CNU Founders and current board members, veterans of past juries, and young designers new to the task. Members ably represented This year’s Charter Awards provide Given the growing alertness to reassuring evidence that these prin - TENTH ANNIVERSARY the community of competence which is the Congress for the New Urbanism. Bringing global climate change, our incipient ciples are widely understood and holistic knowledge and a passion for excellence, we met through a winter tempest in post-peak-oil era, and the turbulent economic times, we expanded our serving as the foundation for excel - CONGRESS FOR THE NEW URBANISM Charleston to review just under 100 projects. Submittals were down from recent years, lent work…The scope of the projects judging criteria, seeking…glimpses that received awards demonstrates but what we lacked in quantity was more than made up for in quality and sophistica - of a more sensible future, looking to that the New Urbanism goes well tion.
  • From the Garden City Movement Onwards

    From the Garden City Movement Onwards

    From the Garden City Movement Onwards Utopianism in British Garden Cities Rick William Moerman Department of Human Geography Examiner: Mads Barbesgaard SGEM08 Supervisor: Anders Lund Hansen Spring 2020 2 Abstract With the publication of Garden Cities of To-Morrow in 1898, Ebenezer Howard gave the go-ahead to the Garden City Movement. Howard’s concept of the garden city arose from his anti-capitalist critiques. Many industrial cities in the United Kingdom were facing urbanization problems, leading to the working class living in terrible circumstances in the suburban areas. This process caused a poor quality of life, housing shortages, polluted air and water and a lack of access to nature. At the same time, the countryside lacked career opportunities and a lack of (cultural) amusement. Howard proposed the garden city as a new alternative to both ways of living. A garden city would have a green character and a blooming cultural life. Surrounding greenbelts and enough job opportunities would make the city self-sustainable. The reactions to Howard’s utopian ideas were mainly positive, leading to the construction of two garden cities in the United Kingdom. Letchworth and Welwyn Garden City were located close to London and offered a way of living as proposed by Howard. These projects were considered successful, leading to the establishment of the related New Town Movement. This movement eventually led to the creation of 28 new and self-sustaining towns all over the United Kingdom. Meanwhile, the two original garden cities had developed into rich commuter towns which had become too expansive for the working class population.
  • OLMSTED TRACT; Torrance, California 2011 – 2013 SURVEY of HISTORIC RESOURCES

    OLMSTED TRACT; Torrance, California 2011 – 2013 SURVEY of HISTORIC RESOURCES

    OLMSTED TRACT; Torrance, California 2011 – 2013 SURVEY OF HISTORIC RESOURCES II. HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT A. Torrance and Garden City Movement: The plan for the original City of Torrance, known as the Olmsted Tract, owes its origins to a movement that begin in England in the late 19th Century. Sir Ebenezer Howard published his manifesto “Garden Cities of To-morrow" in 1898 where he describes a utopian city in which man lives harmoniously together with the rest of nature. The London suburbs of Letchworth Garden City and Welwyn Garden City were the first built examples of garden city planning and became a model for urban planners in America. In 1899 Ebenezer founded the Garden City Association to promote his idea for the Garden City ‘in which all the advantages of the most energetic town life would be secured in perfect combination with all the beauty and delight of the country.” His notions about the integration of nature with town planning had profound influence on the design of cities and the modern suburb in the 20th Century. Examples of Garden City Plans in America include: Forest Hills Gardens, New York (by Fredrick Law Olmsted Jr.); Radburn, New Jersey; Shaker Heights, Ohio; Baldwin Hills Village, in Los Angeles, California and Greenbelt, Maryland. Fredrick Law Olmsted is considered to be the father of the landscape architecture profession in America. He had two sons that inherited his legacy and firm. They practiced as the Olmsted Brothers of Brookline Massachusetts. Fredrick Law Olmsted Junior was a founding member of The National Planning Institute of America and was its President from 1910 to 1919.
  • Housing Development: Housing Policy, Slums, and Squatter Settlements in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil and Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1948-1973

    Housing Development: Housing Policy, Slums, and Squatter Settlements in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil and Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1948-1973

    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: HOUSING DEVELOPMENT: HOUSING POLICY, SLUMS, AND SQUATTER SETTLEMENTS IN RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL AND BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA, 1948-1973 Leandro Daniel Benmergui, Doctor of Philosophy, 2012 Dissertation directed by: Professor Daryle Williams Department of History University of Maryland This dissertation explores the role of low-income housing in the development of two major Latin American societies that underwent demographic explosion, rural-to- urban migration, and growing urban poverty in the postwar era. The central argument treats popular housing as a constitutive element of urban development, interamerican relations, and citizenship, interrogating the historical processes through which the modern Latin American city became a built environment of contrasts. I argue that local and national governments, social scientists, and technical elites of the postwar Americas sought to modernize Latin American societies by deepening the mechanisms for capitalist accumulation and by creating built environments designed to generate modern sociabilities and behaviors. Elite discourse and policy understood the urban home to be owner-occupied and built with a rationalized domestic layout. The modern home for the poor would rely upon a functioning local government capable of guaranteeing a reliable supply of electricity and clean water, as well as sewage and trash removal. Rational transportation planning would allow the city resident access between the home and workplaces, schools, medical centers, and police posts. As interamerican Cold War relations intensified in response to the Cuban Revolution, policymakers, urban scholars, planners, defined in transnational encounters an acute ―housing problem,‖ a term that condensed the myriad aspects involved in urban dwellings for low-income populations.
  • A Comparative Case Study of the Transformation Fron Industry to Leisure in the Ports of San Francisco and Oakland, California

    A Comparative Case Study of the Transformation Fron Industry to Leisure in the Ports of San Francisco and Oakland, California

    Inquiry: The University of Arkansas Undergraduate Research Journal Volume 12 Article 4 Fall 2011 Industrial Evolution: A Comparative Case Study of the Transformation fron Industry to Leisure in the Ports of San Francisco and Oakland, California. Annie Fulton University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/inquiry Part of the Environmental Design Commons, and the Urban, Community and Regional Planning Commons Recommended Citation Fulton, Annie (2011) "Industrial Evolution: A Comparative Case Study of the Transformation fron Industry to Leisure in the Ports of San Francisco and Oakland, California.," Inquiry: The University of Arkansas Undergraduate Research Journal: Vol. 12 , Article 4. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/inquiry/vol12/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Inquiry: The nivU ersity of Arkansas Undergraduate Research Journal by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Fulton: Industrial Evolution: A Comparative Case Study of the Transformat ARCHITECTURE: Annie Fulton 3 INDUSTRIAL EVOLUTION: A COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY OF THE TRANSFORMATION FROM INDUSTRY TO LEISURE IN THE PORTS OF SAN FRANCISCO AND OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA By Annie Fulton Department of Architecture Faculty Mentor: Kim Sexton Department of Architecture Abstract successful conversion of an industrial port into a recreational This case study examined two waterfront sites on the San urban waterfront. Two optimal cases for study are found in the Francisco Bay – The Piers in San Francisco and Jack London San Francisco Bay Area: Piers 1 ½, 3, and 5 (constructed in 1931) Square in Oakland.
  • 1. 1793 Milica Muminovic and Holly Caton 11-26

    1. 1793 Milica Muminovic and Holly Caton 11-26

    Milica Muminovic and Holly Caton Archnet-IJAR, Volume 12 - Issue 3 - November 2018 - (11-26) – Regular Section 4 Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research www.archnet-ijar.net/ -- https://archnet.org/collections/34 SUSTAINING SUBURBIA – THE IMPORTANCE OF THE PUBLIC PRIVATE INTERFACE IN THE CASE OF CANBERRA, AUSTRALIA DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v12i3.1793 Milica Muminovic and Holly Caton Keywords Abstract Among existing and anticipated changes in global sustainable city; sustainable urbanisation and population growth, the challenge of suburbia; public-private retrofitting suburbia within sustainable cities needs to be interface; green space considered. However, given the opposing nature of sustainability and suburbia, this task is not easy. Different approaches have tried to define the theory for achieving sustainable cities, but the nature of suburbia presents issues in densification, as density is perceived to limit the liveability and importantly the private sphere that makes suburbia desirable. To begin addressing sustainability in suburbia, the question of how to densify suburbs while maintaining their liveable quality, needs to be addressed. Focusing on the case of Canberra the paper builds a framework for discussing these questions within analysis of suburb density, behavioural studies and the public private interface. In doing so, it is evident that sustaining suburbia through densification, within the context of sustainable cities, cannot be considered without recognising morphology and the need for, and integration of, the public private interface. * M. Muminovic & H. Caton Assistant Professor, Faculty of Arts and Architecture, University of Canberra, Locked Bag 1, 2601, Canberra Australia Hounours, Faculty of Arts and Architecture, University of Canberra, Locked Bag 1, 2601, Canberra Australia *Corresponding Author’s email address: [email protected] 11 Copyright © 2018 | Copyrights are granted to author(s), Archnet-IJAR, and Archnet @ MIT under the terms of the "CC-BY-NC-ND" License.
  • Planning Theory

    Planning Theory

    Responses to the Industrial City Planning, Social Theory & Policy Industrial City (1870-1920) Population Change: Multiplier Effect Social Change: Immigrants & Class Issues Technological & Environmental Change Restructuring the City Chicago as ‘Shock City’ Multiplier Effect Population Growth: 1840 - 4,470 1870 – 298,977 1900 – 1,698,575 1930 – 3,376,438 Social Change ‘New Immigrants’ (1880 – 1920) – *Eastern European *Southern European Industrial Workers – strikes & violence New Land Use Patterns Central Business District Industrial Districts Residential Districts Commuter Suburbs Industrial Suburbs [Burgess’ Concentric Zone Model] Central Business District Skyscrapers --steel frame --elevator Department Stores Mass Market of Housing Rise of Real Estate Developer Example: S.E. Gross – ‘Friend of the Working Man’ New York’s Zoning “ . Restrictions on land use are constitutional because they enable city government to carry out their duties of protecting the health, safety, morals and general welfare of their citizens.” 1) Separate land uses into appropriate zones; 2) Restrict building heights 3) Limit lot coverage Environmental Controls Emergence of Zoning Laws/Building Codes Parks Movement City Beautiful Movement City Beautiful Movement Goals “beauty, order, system & harmony” Middle & upper-class effort to refashion the city into beautiful, functional entities Focus on civic improvements & parks Ebenezer Howard’s Garden City Howard’s vision Life’s experience: Homesteading, Chicago – before 1871 Town/Country Ebenezer Howard no training in
  • 2011 AICP Review Course HISTORY and THEORY

    2011 AICP Review Course HISTORY and THEORY

    2011 AICP Review Course HISTORY AND THEORY February 2011 Kelly O’Brien, AICP, PP, LEED AP Professional Development Officer of Exam Prep American Planning Association – New Jersey Chapter MAY 2011 AICP EXAM REVIEW HISTORY AND THEORY History and Theory (and Law) 15% • History of planning • Planning law • Theory of planning • Patterns of human settlement MAY 2011 AICP EXAM REVIEW HISTORY AND THEORY Primary functions of planning • improve efficiency of outcomes • counterbalance market failures - balance public and private interests • widen the range of choice - enhance consciousness of decision making • civic engagement - expand opportunity and understanding in community MAY 2011 AICP EXAM REVIEW HISTORY AND THEORY Professionalization of Planning 1901 NYC: “New Law” regulates tenement housing 1907 Hartford: first official & permanent local planning board 1909 – Washington DC: first planning association – National Conference on City Planning – Wisconsin: first state enabling legislation permitting cities to plan – Chicago Plan: Burnham creates first regional plan – Los Angeles: first land use zoning ordinance – Harvard School of Landscape Architecture: first course in city planning MAY 2011 AICP EXAM REVIEW HISTORY AND THEORY Pre-modern to New Urban Form 1682 Philadelphia plan Grid system & William Penn neighborhood parks Thomas Holme 1695 Annapolis plan Radiocentric Francis Nicholson 1733 Savannah Ward park system Oglethorpe 1790 Washington Grand, whole city plan Pierre L’Enfant 1852-1870 Paris Model for “City Beautiful” Napoleon III; Haussmann 1856 Central Park First major purchase of F L Olmsted Sr parkland 1869 Riverside, IL Model curved street FL Olmsted Sr “suburb” Calvert Vaux 1880 Pullman, IL Model industrial town George Pullman MAY 2011 AICP EXAM REVIEW HISTORY AND THEORY Philosophies and Movements Agrarian Philosophy 1800’S – Belief that a life rooted in agriculture is the most humanly valuable.
  • Bodies and Nature in International Garden City Movement Planning, 1898-1937

    Bodies and Nature in International Garden City Movement Planning, 1898-1937

    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: ACTS OF LIVELIHOOD: BODIES AND NATURE IN INTERNATIONAL GARDEN CITY MOVEMENT PLANNING, 1898-1937 Samuel M. Clevenger Doctor of Philosophy, 2018 Dissertation directed by: Professor David L. Andrews Department of Kinesiology Urban planning and reform scholars and policymakers continue to cite the “garden city” community model as a potential blueprint for planning environmentally sustainable, economically equitable, humane built environments. Articulated by the British social reformer Sir Ebenezer Howard and his 1898 book To-Morrow: A Peaceful Path to Real Reform, the model represented a method for uniting the benefits of town and country through a singular, pre-planned, “healthy” community, balancing spaces of “countryside” and “nature” with affordable, well-built housing and plentiful cultural attractions associated with city life. The book catalyzed an early twentieth-century international movement for the promotion and construction of garden cities. Howard’s garden city remains a highly influential context in the history of town planning and urban public health reform, as well as more recent environmentally-friendly urban design movements. To date, while historians have long examined the garden city as an agent of social and spatial reform, little analysis has been devoted to the role of prescribed embodiment and deemed “healthy” physical cultural forms and practices in the promotion and construction of garden cities as planned communities for “healthy living.” Informed by recent scholarship in Physical Cultural Studies (PCS), embodied environmental history, cultural materialism, and theories of modern biopower, this dissertation studies the cultural history of international garden city movement planning in early twentieth century Britain and the United States.
  • The Importance of Death and Life of Great American Cities (1961) by Jane Jacobs to the Profession of Urban Planning

    The Importance of Death and Life of Great American Cities (1961) by Jane Jacobs to the Profession of Urban Planning

    The Importance of Death and Life of Great American Cities (1961) by Jane Jacobs to the Profession of Urban Planning Matthias Wendt New Visions for Public Affairs – Volume 1, Spring 2009 School of Urban Affairs and Public Policy – University of Delaware, Newark, DE www.suapp.udel.edu/nvpa/home Wendt, Matthias Death and Life by Jane Jacobs 1 he Death and Life of Great American Cities, impact of the book on the profession of urban planning. which will be hereafter referred to as Death In addition, Jane Jacobs’ influence on the New T and Life, was the first and most influential Urbanism movement is explored, and her concepts are book by Jane Jacobs, a writer and city activist from finally applied to the Atlantic Yards Project, a large- New York City. The book was first published in 1961 scale urban redevelopment project in Brooklyn, New and it frontally attacked the principles and objectives of York. modernist, orthodox city planning and rebuilding in the post-war U.S. I. Urban Planning and U.S. Cities in the Post-War Death and Life is a reaction to the devastating results of Period post-war American urban renewal. Jacobs’ 1961 landmark critique directly attacks what she calls Jane Jacobs evolved the ideas set forth in Death and “orthodox” city planning and rebuilding. She Life as a young mother living in New York’s documents the failures of modernist planning ideas and Greenwich Village during the postwar period, when the argues that the various foundations of intellectual big American cities were in a state of crisis.