DOCSLIB.ORG

WPA Survey of Captive Birds 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
WPA Survey of Captive Birds 2020 Private Breeders & Zoo Collections (109) Approx 50% ringed Common name Latin name Adults Juveniles M F M F ? Breeding 12 Pairs 2020 Young Pairs Mth+ Satyr tragopan Tragopan satyra 31 32 14 19 5 Temminck's tragopan Tragopan temminckii 42 45 15 18 36 Cabot's tragopan Tragopan caboti 39 31 11 13 9 Koklass pheasant Pucrasia macrolopha 13 14 23 16 23 Himalayan monal Lophophorus impeyanus 23 25 11 7 36 Red junglefowl Gallus gallus 6 6 11 7 5 Ceylon junglefowl Gallus lafayettei 6 5 6 8 Grey junglefowl Gallus sonneratii 16 25 15 13 17 Green junglefowl Gallus varius 1 kalij pheasant - unknown subspecies Lophura leucomelana 3 1 1 White-crested kalij pheasant Lophura l. hamiltoni 5 4 2 Nepal Kalij pheasant Lophura l. leucomelana 7 7 1 4 Crawfurd's kalij pheasant Lophura l. crawfurdi Lineated kalij pheasant Lophura l. lineata 1 1 2 1 Silver pheasant - unknown subspecies Lophura nycthemera 2 3 1 True silver pheasant Lophura n. nycthemera 15 18 26 23 5 Berlioz’s silver pheasant Lophura n. berliozi 2 2 Lewis’s silver pheasant Lophura n. lewisi 5 5 3 3 Imperial pheasant Lophura imperialis 1 1 Edwards's pheasant Lophura edwardsi edwardsi 72 66 21 22 18 Vietnamese pheasant Lophura e. hatinhensis 50 45 17 20 18 Swinhoe's pheasant Lophura swinhoii 11 13 4 4 6 Salvadori's pheasant Lophura inornata 6 4 1 Malaysian crestless fireback Lophura e. erythrophthalma 7 10 4 2 2 Bornean crested fireback pheasant Lophura i. ignita/nobilis 3 4 1 1 Malaysian crestless fireback/Vieillot's Lophura i. rufa 3 3 2 4 5 Pheasant Siamese fireback pheasant Lophura diardi 11 11 7 7 24 Southern Cavcasus Phasianus C. colchicus Manchurian Ring Neck Phasianus C. pallasi 5 40 200 Northern Japanese Green Phasianus versicolor robustipes Bianchi's Pheasant Phasianus c. bianchii 1 2 White eared-pheasant Crossoptilon crossoptilon 12 18 1 2 10 White-eared pheasant subsp. Drouyni Crossoptilon c. drouynii 3 3 2 1 Brown eared-pheasant Crossoptilon mantchuricum 13 11 8 13 9 Blue eared-pheasant Crossoptilon auritum 10 17 1 17 Cheer pheasant Catreus wallichii 8 9 9 4 8 Elliot's pheasant Syrmaticum ellioti 23 27 28 28 Mrs. Hume's pheasant Syrmaticus humiae 9 8 8 7 10 Mikado pheasant Syrmaticus mikado 16 18 25 24 6 Scintillating copper pheasant Syrmaticus s. scintillans 7 6 2 4 Ijima’s copper pheasant Syrmaticus s. ijimae 7 6 3 4 Soemmerring’s copper pheasant Syrmaticus s. soemmerringi 10 8 5 2 Reeves' pheasant Syrmaticus reevesii 34 64 15 18 52 Chinese ring-necked pheasant Phasianus colchicus torquatus Japanese pheasant Phasianus versicolor 6 20 3 1 22 Golden pheasant Chrysolophus pictus 64 76 60 50 25 Lady Amherst's pheasant Chrysolophus amherstiae 39 55 50 37 11 Northern bronze-tailed peacock-pheasant Polyplectron c. scutulatum 13 3 1 Mountain peacock-pheasant Polyplectron inopinatum 32 33 9 8 26 Germain's peacock-pheasant Polyplectron germaini 9 9 3 5 3 Grey peacock-pheasant Polyplectron bicalcaratum 26 24 13 14 10 Malay peacock-pheasant Polyplectron malacense 9 6 2 1 11 Palawan peacock-pheasant Polyplectron emphanum 53 47 6 5 10 Bornean peacock pheasant Polyplectron schleiermacheri 11 7 2 1 Great argus pheasant Argusianus argus 19 27 6 Indian peafowl Pavo cristatus 91 70 19 21 102 Green peafowl Pavo muticus 10 11 2 1 Green Peafowl ~ Indo Chinese (Thailand) Pavo Muticus Imperator Congo peafowl Afropavo congensis Partridge Madagascar partridge Margaroperdix madagarensis 2 3 6 3 Roulroul (=crested wood) partridge Rollulus roulroul 100 86 18 12 59 Red-legged partridge Alectoris rufa 40 40 Grey partridge Perdix perdix 47 47 186 Rickett’s hill-partridge Arborophila gingica 30 38 2 2 18 Chinese bamboo-partridge Bambusicola thoracica 1 1 Black francolin Francolinus francolinus 5 10 27 Erckel’s francolin Francolinus erckelii Quail Common quail Coturnix coturnix 171 164 3 10 Harlequin quail Coturnix delegorguei 2 2 3 3 Chinese painted quail Coturnix chinensis 6 7 California quail Lophortyx californica 10 15 Gambel’s quail Lophortyx gambelli Northern bobwhite quail Colinus virginianus 4 5 30 Turkeys Common turkey Meleagris gallopavo 3 3 3 Ocellated turkey Agriocharis ocellata Cracids Piping guan Pipile pipile 7 4 6 Blue Throated Piping guan Aburria pipile cumanensis 16 17 2 9 Great curassow Crax rubra 3 3 Bare-faced curassow Crax fasciolata 4 4 Black curassow Crax alector 11 4 5 Yellow-knobbed curassow Crax daubentoni 5 6 Northern helmeted curassow Pauxi pauxi 15 15 1 2 4 Southern helmeted curassow Pauxi unicornis 1 Grouse Red grouse Lagopus l. rufus/scoticus 6 6 1 2 14 Rock ptarmigan Lagopus mutus 5 4 21 Black grouse Tetrao tetrix 6 4 2 4 6 Spruce grouse Dendragapus canadensis Western capercaillie Tetrao urogallus 2 4 3 3 Guineafowl Helmeted guineafowl Numida meleagris 5 3 15 Vulturine guineafowl Acryllium vulturinum Species not listed above Kenya crested guineafowl Guttera pucherani 7 4 Barbary Partridge 7 7 2 1 27 North American Ruffed Grouse Ruff 7 26 Emu 4 4 Junglebush Quail 4 3 6 6 5 Southern Crested Guineafowl 2 2 Reichenowi Guineafowl 2 2 Mountain Bamboo Partridge 1 1 2 2 Philby's Partridge 3 3 2 2 See See Partridge 2 2 Mountain Quail 3 3 8 Rain Quail 3 3 11 9 Grey Francolin 1 1 3 2 Hildebrandts Francolin 1 1 Double Spurred Francolin 1 Pintailed Sand Grouse 1 1 Greater Rhea 1 2 3 Rock Partridge 2 2 Chuker Partridge 6 3 8 Red-billed Currasow 2 2 6 Chestnut-bellied Partridge 2 Yellow Golden Pheasant 4 7 12 Mearns Quail 1 1 Blue Scale Quail 3 3 40 Jones Silver 1 4 4 2 Spix's Guan 2 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Keeping Pheasants
    KKKEEEEEEPPPIIINNNGGG PPPHHHEEEAAASSSAAANNNTTTSSS AAASSS AAA HHHOOOBBBBBBYYY Text and photos: Jan Willem Schrijvers Photo above: Siamese Fireback pheasant male(Lophura diardi). ORIGIN AND LIFESTYLE OF THE WILD PHEASANT Pheasants are wild gallinaceous birds all originating in Asia. One exception is the Congo peacock from Africa. (The pheasants also include game fowl and peacocks.) Each species has its own characteristics and life habits. There are species that live in tropical rain forests, but there are species that live in the mountains, on cold plains. This is something to take in account when housing our pheasants (with or without a night coop, with or without heating). Most species live in and around the mountains with a woodland vegetation, where they can find lots of berries, greens and seeds. It is of utmost importance to first consider the habits and living conditions of the species you want to keep. Only with proper housing will these beautiful birds show to their fullest, and reproduce. PHEASANTS IN AVIARIES In the past there were some "pheasant farms" which mainly bred the common pheasant (also known as ring-neck pheasant). The birds on these farms were bred for sport hunting. They were released en masse in the autumn in the fields and other areas to be shot for the sport. Some escaped from the hunters and that is why today we can see wild pheasants roam our fields and woods. These pheasants have also succeeded in reproducing themselves, even though they are not native birds. The birds are also kept for their colourful feathers. Each year I see Prince Carnival walk again with the beautiful feathers of the Reeves's Pheasant at his cocked hat.
    [Show full text]
  • Nogth AMERICAN BIRDS
    CHECK-LIST OF NOgTH AMERICAN BIRDS The Speciesof Birds of North America from the Arctic through Panama, Including the West Indies and Hawaiian Islands PREPARED BY THE COMMITTEE ON CLASSIFICATION AND NOMENCLATURE OF THE AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION SEVENTH EDITION 1998 Zo61ogical nomenclature is a means, not an end, to Zo61ogical Science PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION 1998 Copyright 1998 by The American Ornithologists' Union All rights reserved, except that pages or sections may be quoted for research purposes. ISBN Number: 1-891276-00-X Preferred citation: American Ornithologists' Union. 1983. Check-list of North American Birds. 7th edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. Printed by Allen Press, Inc. Lawrence, Kansas, U.S.A. CONTENTS DEDICATION ...................................................... viii PREFACE ......................................................... ix LIST OF SPECIES ................................................... xvii THE CHECK-LIST ................................................... 1 I. Tinamiformes ............................................. 1 1. Tinamidae: Tinamous .................................. 1 II. Gaviiformes .............................................. 3 1. Gaviidae: Loons ....................................... 3 III. Podicipediformes.......................................... 5 1. Podicipedidae:Grebes .................................. 5 IV. Procellariiformes .......................................... 9 1. Diomedeidae: Albatrosses .............................
    [Show full text]
  • Congo Peacock – an Update
    Congo Peacock – an update The discovery of Congo Peacock Afropavo congensis was one of the most sensational ornithological events of the 20 th century, partly because such a large bird had eluded discovery and partly because of its potential affinity with Asiatic species (1). It was in 1936 that James Chapin found two mounted specimens put away on top of a cabinet at the Belgian Congo Museum (now Royal Museum for Central Africa in Tervuren, near Brussels), having been misidentified as Pavo cristatus for 20 years, and thus considered uninteresting (2). It was rediscovered and photographed by wildlife film-maker Alan Root in 1993 (3, 4). It has remained an elusive and rarely seen and photographed species so it was with great interest and excitement to receive this photograph of a female Congo Peacock located by Mark Van Beirs (http://www.birdquest-tours.com/news ) ABC member Michel Louette, the former head of Ornithology at the RMCA writes to say that his late student Emile Mulotwa at the University of Kisangani, worked on this species for his doctoral thesis in 2008. During this work, he made many sightings (5-7). But Emile died sadly in a plane accident in 2011. References 1. Urban, E.K., Fry, C.H. and Keith, S. (1986) The Birds of Africa Volume II, pp. 11-13. 2. Chapin, J.P. (1936) A new peacock-like bird from the Belgian Congo. Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr. 29, pp. 1-6. 3. Fanshawe, J.H. (1994): Elusive Congo Peacock found by filmmaker Alan Root. ABC Bulletin 1(1) p 27.
    [Show full text]
  • A Molecular Phylogeny of the Pheasants and Partridges Suggests That These Lineages Are Not Monophyletic R
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution Vol. 11, No. 1, February, pp. 38–54, 1999 Article ID mpev.1998.0562, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on A Molecular Phylogeny of the Pheasants and Partridges Suggests That These Lineages Are Not Monophyletic R. T. Kimball,* E. L. Braun,*,† P. W. Zwartjes,* T. M. Crowe,‡,§ and J. D. Ligon* *Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131; †National Center for Genome Resources, 1800 Old Pecos Trail, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505; ‡Percy FitzPatrick Institute, University of Capetown, Rondebosch, 7700, South Africa; and §Department of Ornithology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, New York 10024-5192 Received October 8, 1997; revised June 2, 1998 World partridges are smaller and widely distributed in Cytochrome b and D-loop nucleotide sequences were Asia, Africa, and Europe. Most partridge species are used to study patterns of molecular evolution and monochromatic and primarily dull colored. None exhib- phylogenetic relationships between the pheasants and its the extreme or highly specialized ornamentation the partridges, which are thought to form two closely characteristic of the pheasants. related monophyletic galliform lineages. Our analyses Although the order Galliformes is well defined, taxo- used 34 complete cytochrome b and 22 partial D-loop nomic relationships are less clear within the group sequences from the hypervariable domain I of the (Verheyen, 1956), due to the low variability in anatomi- D-loop, representing 20 pheasant species (15 genera) and 12 partridge species (5 genera). We performed cal and osteological traits (Blanchard, 1857, cited in parsimony, maximum likelihood, and distance analy- Verheyen, 1956; Lowe, 1938; Delacour, 1977).
    [Show full text]
  • 1471-2148-10-132.Pdf
    Shen et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2010, 10:132 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/10/132 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access AResearch mitogenomic article perspective on the ancient, rapid radiation in the Galliformes with an emphasis on the Phasianidae Yong-Yi Shen1,2,3, Lu Liang1,2,3, Yan-Bo Sun1,2,3, Bi-Song Yue4, Xiao-Jun Yang1, Robert W Murphy1,5 and Ya- Ping Zhang*1,2 Abstract Background: The Galliformes is a well-known and widely distributed Order in Aves. The phylogenetic relationships of galliform birds, especially the turkeys, grouse, chickens, quails, and pheasants, have been studied intensively, likely because of their close association with humans. Despite extensive studies, convergent morphological evolution and rapid radiation have resulted in conflicting hypotheses of phylogenetic relationships. Many internal nodes have remained ambiguous. Results: We analyzed the complete mitochondrial (mt) genomes from 34 galliform species, including 14 new mt genomes and 20 published mt genomes, and obtained a single, robust tree. Most of the internal branches were relatively short and the terminal branches long suggesting an ancient, rapid radiation. The Megapodiidae formed the sister group to all other galliforms, followed in sequence by the Cracidae, Odontophoridae and Numididae. The remaining clade included the Phasianidae, Tetraonidae and Meleagrididae. The genus Arborophila was the sister group of the remaining taxa followed by Polyplectron. This was followed by two major clades: ((((Gallus, Bambusicola) Francolinus) (Coturnix, Alectoris)) Pavo) and (((((((Chrysolophus, Phasianus) Lophura) Syrmaticus) Perdix) Pucrasia) (Meleagris, Bonasa)) ((Lophophorus, Tetraophasis) Tragopan))). Conclusions: The traditional hypothesis of monophyletic lineages of pheasants, partridges, peafowls and tragopans was not supported in this study.
    [Show full text]
  • CITES Cop16 Prop. 17 IUCN-TRAFFIC Analysis (PDF, 88KB)
    Ref. CoP16 Prop. 17 Deletion of Imperial Pheasant Lophura imperialis from Appendix I Proponent: Switzerland, as Depositary Government, at the request of the Animals Committee (prepared by France) Summary: The Imperial Pheasant Lophura imperialis is a rare dark-blue pheasant known in the wild from just four records from Viet Nam. First described in 1924 from a single live pair, it is now accepted as being an occasional naturally-occurring hybrid between Silver Pheasant L. nycthemera and Edward’s Pheasant L. edwardsi. A bird captured in 1990 was likely a hybrid between L. nycthemera and Vietnamese Pheasant L. hatinhensis which itself has been found to be an inbred form of L. edwardsi. There have been no other confirmed reports of Imperial Pheasant in the wild. A captive stock was established in Europe and the USA from a pair caught in 1923, which were subsequently cross-bred with Lophura nycthemera to create new stock. Birds with Imperial Pheasant phenotype have also been created in captivity by hybridizing Silver Pheasant and Edward’s Pheasant. Lophura imperialis and L. edwardsi were both listed in CITES Appendix I in 1975. Since 1975 international trade in 31 L. imperialis individuals has been reported in the CITES trade database, all but four declared as captive-bred. These four comprise animals exported before 1999 from non-range States with no source code included in the record. There is no reason to suppose that these were not also captive-bred. Lophura imperialis is proposed for removal from Appendix I on the basis that it is no longer recognised as a species.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Galliformes in Pipar Pheasant Reserve and Santel, Annapurna, Nepal
    Status of Galliformes in Pipar Pheasant Reserve and Santel, Annapurna, Nepal 1 2 3 4 LAXMAN P. POUDYAL *, NAVEEN K. MAHATO , PARAS B. SINGH , POORNESWAR SUBEDI , HEM S. BARAL 5 and PHILIP J. K. MCGOWAN 6 1 Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, PO Box 860, Babarmahal, Kathmandu, Nepal. 2 Red Panda Network – Nepal, PO Box 21477, Kathmandu, Nepal. 3 Biodiversity Conservation Society, PO Box 24304, Kathmandu, Nepal. 4 Department of Forests, Kathmandu, Nepal. 5 Bird Conservation Nepal, PO Box 12465, Lazimpat, Kathmandu, Nepal. 6 World Pheasant Association, Newcastle University Biology Field Station, Close House Estate, Heddon on the Wall, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE15 0HT UK. *Correspondence author - [email protected] Paper presented at the 4 th International Galliformes Symposium, 2007, Chengdu, China. Abstract The Galliformes of Pipar have been surveyed seven times between 1979 and 1998. The nearby area of Santel was surveyed using comparable methods in 2001. In continuance of the long- term monitoring at Pipar and to provide a second count at Santel, dawn call counts were conducted in both areas, using the same survey points as previous surveys, between 29 th April and 9 th May 2005. The aim of those surveys was to collect information on the status of pheasants and partridges and to look for any changes over time. In both areas, galliform numbers were higher in 2005 than in previous surveys, for most species. For each species there was no evidence of decline since the first counts were conducted nearly 30 years ago. Both areas provide good habitat for Galliformes and disturbance is not a serious issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Turkey Education Guide
    Table of Contents Section 1: Eastern Wild Turkey Ecology 1. Eastern Wild Turkey Quick Facts………………………………………………...pg 2 2. Eastern Wild Turkey Fact Sheet………………………………………………….pg 4 3. Wild Turkey Lifecycle……………………………………………………………..pg 8 4. Eastern Wild Turkey Adaptations ………………………………………………pg 9 Section 2: Eastern Wild Turkey Management 1. Wild Turkey Management Timeline…………………….……………………….pg 18 2. History of Wild Turkey Management …………………...…..…………………..pg 19 3. Modern Wild Turkey Management in Maryland………...……………………..pg 22 4. Managing Wild Turkeys Today ……………………………………………….....pg 25 Section 3: Activity Lesson Plans 1. Activity: Growing Up WILD: Tasty Turkeys (Grades K-2)……………..….…..pg 33 2. Activity: Calling All Turkeys (Grades K-5)………………………………..…….pg 37 3. Activity: Fit for a Turkey (Grades 3-5)…………………………………………...pg 40 4. Activity: Project WILD adaptation: Too Many Turkeys (Grades K-5)…..…….pg 43 5. Activity: Project WILD: Quick, Frozen Critters (Grades 5-8).……………….…pg 47 6. Activity: Project WILD: Turkey Trouble (Grades 9-12………………….……....pg 51 7. Activity: Project WILD: Let’s Talk Turkey (Grades 9-12)..……………..………pg 58 Section 4: Additional Activities: 1. Wild Turkey Ecology Word Find………………………………………….…….pg 66 2. Wild Turkey Management Word Find………………………………………….pg 68 3. Turkey Coloring Sheet ..………………………………………………………….pg 70 4. Turkey Coloring Sheet ..………………………………………………………….pg 71 5. Turkey Color-by-Letter……………………………………..…………………….pg 72 6. Five Little Turkeys Song Sheet……. ………………………………………….…pg 73 7. Thankful Turkey…………………..…………………………………………….....pg 74 8. Graph-a-Turkey………………………………….…………………………….…..pg 75 9. Turkey Trouble Maze…………………………………………………………..….pg 76 10. What Animals Made These Tracks………………………………………….……pg 78 11. Drinking Straw Turkey Call Craft……………………………………….….……pg 80 Section 5: Wild Turkey PowerPoint Slide Notes The facilities and services of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources are available to all without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, age, national origin or physical or mental disability.
    [Show full text]
  • Tinamiformes – Falconiformes
    LIST OF THE 2,008 BIRD SPECIES (WITH SCIENTIFIC AND ENGLISH NAMES) KNOWN FROM THE A.O.U. CHECK-LIST AREA. Notes: "(A)" = accidental/casualin A.O.U. area; "(H)" -- recordedin A.O.U. area only from Hawaii; "(I)" = introducedinto A.O.U. area; "(N)" = has not bred in A.O.U. area but occursregularly as nonbreedingvisitor; "?" precedingname = extinct. TINAMIFORMES TINAMIDAE Tinamus major Great Tinamou. Nothocercusbonapartei Highland Tinamou. Crypturellus soui Little Tinamou. Crypturelluscinnamomeus Thicket Tinamou. Crypturellusboucardi Slaty-breastedTinamou. Crypturellus kerriae Choco Tinamou. GAVIIFORMES GAVIIDAE Gavia stellata Red-throated Loon. Gavia arctica Arctic Loon. Gavia pacifica Pacific Loon. Gavia immer Common Loon. Gavia adamsii Yellow-billed Loon. PODICIPEDIFORMES PODICIPEDIDAE Tachybaptusdominicus Least Grebe. Podilymbuspodiceps Pied-billed Grebe. ?Podilymbusgigas Atitlan Grebe. Podicepsauritus Horned Grebe. Podicepsgrisegena Red-neckedGrebe. Podicepsnigricollis Eared Grebe. Aechmophorusoccidentalis Western Grebe. Aechmophorusclarkii Clark's Grebe. PROCELLARIIFORMES DIOMEDEIDAE Thalassarchechlororhynchos Yellow-nosed Albatross. (A) Thalassarchecauta Shy Albatross.(A) Thalassarchemelanophris Black-browed Albatross. (A) Phoebetriapalpebrata Light-mantled Albatross. (A) Diomedea exulans WanderingAlbatross. (A) Phoebastriaimmutabilis Laysan Albatross. Phoebastrianigripes Black-lootedAlbatross. Phoebastriaalbatrus Short-tailedAlbatross. (N) PROCELLARIIDAE Fulmarus glacialis Northern Fulmar. Pterodroma neglecta KermadecPetrel. (A) Pterodroma
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Ecology of Tibetan Eared Pheasant Crossoptilon Harmani in Scrub Environment, with Special Reference to the Effect of Food
    Ibis (2003), 145, 657–666 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Reproductive ecology of Tibetan Eared Pheasant Crossoptilon harmani in scrub environment, with special reference to the effect of food XIN LU1* & GUANG-MEI ZHENG2 1Department of Zoology, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China 2Department of Ecology, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China We studied the nesting ecology of two groups of the endangered Tibetan Eared Pheasants Crossoptilon harmani in scrub environments near Lhasa, Tibet, during 1996 and 1999–2001. One group received artificial food from a nunnery prior to incubation whereas the other fed on natural food. This difference in the birds’ nutritional history allowed us to assess the effects of food on reproduction. Laying occurred between mid-April and early June, with a peak at the end of April or early May. Eggs were laid around noon. Adult females produced one clutch per year. Clutch size averaged 7.4 eggs (4–11). Incubation lasted 24–25 days. We observed a higher nesting success (67.7%) than reported for other eared pheasants. Pro- visioning had no significant effect on the timing of clutch initiation or nesting success, and a weak effect on egg size and clutch size (explaining 8.2% and 9.1% of the observed variation, respectively). These results were attributed to the observation that the unprovisioned birds had not experienced local food shortage before laying, despite spending more time feeding and less time resting than the provisioned birds. Nest-site selection by the pheasants was non-random with respect to environmental variables. Rock-cavities with an entrance aver- aging 0.32 m2 in size and not deeper than 1.5 m were greatly preferred as nest-sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Pheasant Chrysolophus Pictus
    Young Golden Pheasant Chrysolophus pictus What is the history of my relationship to man? The Golden Pheasant is commonly found in zoos and aviaries, but often as impure specimens that have the similar Lady Amherst's Pheasant in their lineage. Habitat / Climate Where am I from? dark young conifer forests The Golden Pheasant or "Chinese Pheasant",is a parrot like Map with sparse undergrowth gamebird of the order Galliformes. It is native to forests in mountainous areas of western China but feral populations have been established in the United Kingdom and elsewhere. Other family members: Caspian snowcock Who are my relatives? Gray partridge Silver Pheasant, Little chachalaca, Yellow- knobbed curassow and Western capercaillie the Turkey Breeding Potential How am I born? We lay 8-12 eggs at a time and will then incubate these for around 22-23 days. Clutch size 8 to 12 eggs When we hatch we are able to walk and look for food with in hours. By a few weeks we will loose our down and have our feathers in. How long does it take me to grow up and how long do I live Once we have gotten our feathers we will keep getting bigger. By 3 months we will be full Breeding Season grown, we might add a few pounds after that but wont get larger. We can live up to 6 years. J F M A M J J A S O N D A E A P A U U U E C O E N B R R Y N L G P T V C What kind of family life do I have? We are extremely territorial.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating Density of Secretive Terrestrial Birds (Siamese Fireback) in Pristine and Degraded Forest Using Camera Traps and Distance Sampling
    Global Ecology and Conservation xx (xxxx) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Global Ecology and Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/gecco Original research article Estimating density of secretive terrestrial birds (siamese fireback) in pristine and degraded forest using camera traps and distance sampling a,b,∗ b c Q1 Saranphat Suwanrat , Dusit Ngoprasert , Christopher Sutherland , Pongthep Suwanwaree a, Tommaso Savini b a School of Biology, Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand b Conservation Ecology Program, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand c Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States article info a b s t r a c t Article history: Tropical Asian Galliformes are secretive and difficult to survey. Many of these species Received 29 October 2014 are considered ``at risk'' due to habitat degradation although reliable density estimates Received in revised form 28 January 2015 are lacking. Using camera trapping and distance sampling data collected on the Siamese Accepted 28 January 2015 Fireback (Lophura diardi) in northeastern Thailand, we compared density estimates for Available online xxxx pristine and degraded lowland forest. Density was poorly estimated using distance sampling, likely due to small sample size arising from poor visibility in dense vegetation Keywords: and bird's sensitivity to observers. We analyzed camera trap data using both count-based Royle–Nichols model Binomial mixture model and presence/absence-based methods. Those density estimates had narrower confidence Beta-binomial mixture model intervals than those obtained using distance sampling. Estimated density was higher in dry −2 −2 Lophura diardi evergreen forest (5:6 birds km ), than in old forest plantations (0:2 birds km ), perhaps Galliformes because dense forest habitats provide Firebacks with more resources and refuge from Sakaerat Environmental Research Station predation.
    [Show full text]