7716/7760 Bodega Avenue

DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY AND

EFFECT FOR THE WOODMARK APARTMENTS

PROJECT, CITY OF SEBASTOPOL,

SONOMA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Prepared by

Melinda A. Peak Peak & Associates, Inc. 3941 Park Drive, Suite 20-329 El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 (916) 939-2405

Prepared for

Pacific West Communities 430 E. State Street, Suite 100 Eagle, Idaho 83616

August 26, 2019 (Job #19-071)

INTRODUCTION

The project area is a 3.55± acre site encompassing two parcels (APNs 004-211-007 and 060-230- 067) located at 7716 and 7760 Bodega Avenue in the City of Sebastopol. The project area lies on lands of the Cañada de Jonive land grant (Figures 1 - 3).

Melinda A. Peak, senior historian/archeologist with Peak & Associates, Inc. served as principal investigator for the study, with Neal Neuenschwander, senior archeologist, completing the field surveys (resumes, Appendix 1).

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The development will consist of 84 units, to be constructed in two phases. The first phase, located on a 2.89± acre portion of the 3.55± site, will include 24 two-bedroom units and 24 three-bedroom units, within 4 three-story residential buildings. A separate community building will contain a large meeting room with a full kitchen, leasing office, computer room, restrooms, fitness room and laundry room. Outside the community building, there will be a children’s play area, covered ADA accessible picnic tables and a basketball court. The development will provide 149 parking spaces; the balance of the 2.89±acres will be landscaped.

The second phase of the project will add 24 two-bedroom units and 12 three-bedroom units, within 3 additional three-story residential buildings, plus 28 additional parking spaces and landscaping.

REGULATORY CONTEXT

The Section 106 review process is implemented using a five step procedure: 1) identification and evaluation of historic properties; 2) assessment of the effects of the undertaking on properties that are eligible for the National Register; 3) consultation with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and other agencies for the development of a memorandum of agreement (MOA) that addresses the treatment of historic properties; 4) receipt of Advisory Council on Historic Preservation comments on the MOA or results of consultation; and 5) the project implementation according to the conditions of the MOA.

The Section 106 compliance process may not consist of all the steps above, depending on the situation. For example, if identification and evaluation result in the documented conclusion that no properties included in or eligible for inclusion are present, the process ends with the identification and evaluation step.

Figure 1

Figure 3

FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATION

Decisions regarding management of cultural resources hinge on determinations of their significance (36 CFR 60.2). As part of this decision-making process the National Park Service has identified components which must be considered in the evaluation process, including:

o criteria for significance;

o historic context; and

o integrity.

Criteria for Significance

Significance of cultural resources is measured against the National Register criteria for evaluation:

The quality of significance in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering, and culture is present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association, and,

(a) that are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or

(b) that are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or

(c) that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or

(d) that have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history (36 CFR 60.4).

Historic Context

The historic context is a narrative statement “that groups information about a series of historic properties based on a shared theme, specific time period, and geographical area.” To evaluate resources in accordance with federal guidelines, these sites must be examined to determine whether they are examples of a defined “property type.” The property type is a “grouping of individual properties based on shared physical or associative characteristics.” Through this evaluation, each site is viewed as a representative of a class of similar properties rather than as a unique phenomenon.

A well-developed historical context helps determine the association between property types and broad patterns of American history. Once this linkage is established, each resource's potential to address specific research issues can be explicated.

Integrity

For a property to be eligible for listing in the National Register it must meet one of the criteria for significance (36 CFR 60.4 [a, b, c, or d]) and retain integrity. Integrity is defined as “the authenticity of a property's historic identity, evidenced by the survival of physical characteristics that existed during the property's historic or prehistoric period.”

The following discussion is derived from National Register Bulletin 15 (“How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation”).

Within the concept of integrity, there are seven aspects or qualities that define integrity in various combinations. The seven aspects are: location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. To retain historic integrity, a property will possess several or usually most of these aspects. The retention of specific aspects is necessary for a property to convey this significance. Determining which of the seven aspects are important involves knowing why, where and when the property is significant.

The prescribed steps in assessing integrity are as follows:

• define the essential physical features that must be present for a property to represent its significance;

• determine whether the essential physical features are visible enough to convey their significance;

• determine whether the property needs to be compared with similar properties; and,

• determine, based on the significance and essential physical features, which aspects of integrity are particularly vital to the property being nominated and if they are present.

Ultimately, the question of integrity is answered by whether or not the property retains the identity for which it is significant.

All properties change over time. It is not necessary for a property to retain all its historic physical features or characteristics. However, the property must retain the essential physical features that enable it to convey its historic identity. The essential physical features are those features that define why a property is significant.

A property's historic significance depends on certain aspects of integrity. Determining which of the aspects is most important to a particular property requires an understanding of the property's significance and its essential physical features. For example, a property's historic significance can be 6 related to its association with an important event, historical pattern or person. A property that is significant for its historic association is eligible for listing if it retains the essential physical features that made up its character or appearance during the period of its association with the important event, historical pattern, or person.

A property important for association with an event, historical pattern, or person ideally might retain some features of all seven aspects of integrity. Integrity of design and workmanship, however, might not be as important to the significance, and would not be relevant if the property were an archeological site. A basic integrity test for a property associated with an important event or person is whether a historical contemporary would recognize the property as it exists today. For archeological sites that are eligible under criteria A and B, the seven aspects of integrity can be applied in much the same way as they are to buildings, structures, or objects.

In sum, the assessment of a resource's National Register eligibility hinges on meeting two conditions: o the site must possess the potential to be eligible for listing in the National Register under one of the evaluation criteria either individually or as a contributing element of a district based on the historic context that is established; and o the site must possess sufficient integrity, i.e. it must retain the qualities that make it eligible for the National Register.

For the National Register, “a district possesses a significant concentration, linkage, or continuity of ... objects united historically or aesthetically by plan or physical development.” The identity of a district derives from the relationship of its resources, which can be an arrangement of functionally related properties.

California Register of Historical Resources

For the purposes of CEQA, an historical resource is a resource listed in, or determined eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR).

When a project will impact a site, it needs to be determined whether the site is an historical resource, which is defined as any site which:

(A.) Is historically or archeologically significant, or is significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political or cultural annals of California; and

(B) Meets any of the following criteria:

1. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultural heritage;

2. Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past; 7

3. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or

4. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.

CULTURAL HISTORY

Ethnography

Pomo

Seven distinct and mutually unintelligible language divisions existed within this Pomoan language family, some more divergent than German and English (McLendon and Oswalt 1978:274). The seven groups identified by linguists are: Southeastern, Eastern, Northeastern, Northern, Central, Southern, and Kashaya Pomo.

Southern Pomo

The inhabitants of Sebastopol at the time of Euro-American contact were members of the Southern Pomo (McLendon and Oswalt 1978). It is common to refer to the Pomo as if they were a tribe in the normal since of the word, but in fact, the term Pomo covers groups speaking seven mutually unintelligible, though related, languages. Therefore, the Southern Pomo had as much difficulty communicating with their Pomoan neighbors (the Central Pomo to the north and Kashaya to the west) as they did with the completely unrelated Wappo to the east and Coast Miwok to the south. The word Pomo is derived from two northern Pomo words, one the name of a village and the other a suffix indicating “ those who live at ...” (McLendon and Oswalt 1978:277).

Pomo society was based on residential kin groups, with an emphasis on patrilineal ties. A village was comprised of one or more kin groups and had a chief or headman whose position was inherited through patrilineal lines, although group approval was essential (Gifford and Kroeber 1939). The chief had little authority and acted in an advisory capacity to his people. The chief was aided by others who held leadership positions.

Residences were often multi-family and could house two to five nuclear families. Each family had their own entrance and fire hearth. Single-family dwellings were used. Menstrual huts were small and attached to the main house. A major village contained a semi-subterranean dance house that was owned by the headman. This was the largest structure in the village and had a tunnel entrance. The roof was heavily covered by earth (Peri et al. 1985:25, Figure 3b). Religious ceremonies and dances were conducted in the large structure. Many villages also had at least one semi-subterranean sweathouse similar to the dance house but smaller. The 8 sweathouse was also owned by the chief. The sweathouse was used by the men of the village and served as a clubhouse.

Socially, there was considerable interaction between tribelets, and many groups assembled together for the annual “Big Time.” These assemblages served several purposes, including ceremonies, arrangement of new marriages, and visiting by kin. Renewal of ceremonial and political relationships was a direct result of these “Big Times.” Trade was also conducted during these gatherings.

Trade was extensive, and exchange systems extended to the coast and also beyond the Central Valley. The Southern Pomo exchanged food, obsidian, wealth items, and other commodities. Their local food resources were augmented by import of seafoods from the west (Davis 1961). The production of clam shell disc beads was practiced by the Southern Pomo, who procured the shells from the Bodega Bay area. Magnesite occurs naturally near Clear Lake, and both finished, and partially finished pieces were obtained.

The religious system of the Southern Pomo was complex, but much of the mythology has been lost. Rituals were performed during and individual's life cycle to insure his well-being (Peri et al. 1985: 149-154). Herbal treatment for minor illnesses was a common practice, but major illnesses required a special doctor. Both singing and sucking doctors were known.

The Southern Pomo held Ghost Society and Kuksu ceremonies. While the Ghost Society ceremonies were secret and attended only by initiated men, the Kuksu ceremonies were open to all and other villages were often asked to participate in the four-day-long happening that included dances, feasting, and speeches.

The Southern Pomo occupied permanent villages during the winter months, utilizing the stored foods collected during the preceding seasons. As spring commenced and vegetables began to ripen, the population dispersed into smaller camps away from the main villages. This was a strategy designed to better exploit the various food resources as they seasonally ripened.

Bulbs, seeds, berries, and nuts (particularly acorns) were gathered. Some were used raw while others were prepared for storage against the winter months. The acorns, the dietary staple, were harvested and dried for storage. The acorn contains tannin, and this bitter material required special treatment to remove it. The acorns were hulled and pounded with a pestle until a fine meal was obtained. The meal was then subjected to a leaching process that extracted the bitter tannin. Soup or bread could then be made of the processed meal. The men’s activities were centered on fishing and hunting to provide the necessary protein for the diet. large game animals as well as a variety of small mammals were taken. Most game was consumed immediately, although venison was dried for winter use.

The Euro-American intrusions into California caused a disruption of Native lifeways that was catastrophic in scope. Shortly after the establishment of San Francisco Solano de Sonoma in 1823, the pressures of the zealous missionaries were brought to bear on the Southern Pomo. The Sonoma mission converted 996 Indians in the year of 1823 (Barrett 1908:44). To the west, the 9

Russians were also causing disruption through their farming and fur trapping on the Russian River. Introduced diseases were perhaps the most serious problem the Indians then faced as they had no immunity to combat the contagious diseases.

After 1822, when Mexico declared itself independent of Spain, the expansion of land grants and encouragement of settlement intensified the problems of the Native populations. Enslavement of the Indians was a common practice as the rancheros needed a large labor force. However deleterious the Spanish and Mexican intrusions were to the Pomo and other tribes, the American invasion of the 1840s was the most crushing. Certainly, the ravages of diseases and enforced labor were extensive, but the deliberate depopulation of the area by the Americans was nearly overwhelming. Collecting his data long after these disruptions, Barrett was able to identify only one major village in Sebastopol: lá?lahqha meaning “wild goose spring” (McLendon and Oswalt 1978:280, Figure 3).

History

The City lies at the near juncture of two Mexican land grants: Cañada de Jonive and Llano de Santa Rosa.

Cañada de Jonive, to the west, a 10,787-acre Mexican land grant, acquired by James Black from Governor Pío Pico in 1845. In 1849, Black traded this rancho to Jasper O’Farrell for his land grant Ranch Nicasio. O’Farrell married in 1849, and he and his wife settled on the Jonive Rancho, which they renamed the “Annaly Ranch.” The spelling of the ranch name was later corrupted to “Analy.” The O’Farrells’ home was an adobe at the foot of Jonive Hill near the community of Freestone, which was later a store, and fell in 1906. The patent for the Rancho lands was issued in 1858 to Jasper O’Farrell (Hoover, Rensch and Rensch 1970).

The Llano de Santa Rosa land grant of 13,361 acres was made to Joaquín Carrillo, a brother-in- law of General Vallejo in 1845 by Governor Manuel Micheltorena. Carrillo built an adobe house near the western edge of the grant in 1846 on what is now Petaluma Avenue. Carrillo became the owner of two hotels in Sebastopol (the Analy and the Pioneer) as well as a saloon and boarding house. In 1871, the patent for the lands was issued to Carrillo. Carrillo lived in Sebastool until his death in 1899 (Hoover, Rensch and Rensch 1970; Western Sonoma County Historical Society 2003).

The town of Sebastopol was started on the lands between the two ranchos by Joseph H.P. Morris. It was first named “Pine Grove” in 1853. At one point, there were five towns named Sebastopol in California, all named soon after 1854 and the siege of the Russian seaport of that name by British and French forces.

This is the only town with this name to survive—Napa’s Sebastopol is now Yountville and the communities of Sebastopol in Tulare, Sacramento, and Nevada counties no longer exist. Local tradition places the renaming of the town resulted from a war of words between two parties at the general store, with one party waiting all day for the other to exit the store. When the post office 10 was set to be established in the town, it was found there was already a Pine Grove in California, so the name Sebastopol was selected (Gudde 1969; Western Sonoma County Historical Society 2003).

The early settlers of the region soon discovered the agricultural value of the land. Early crops included fruit, especially grapes and apples. Hops, cherries and berries later became important crops.

Another individual to recognize the importance of the agricultural value of the area was famed horticulturalist Luther Burbank. He started his work in Santa Rosa in 1878, but rapidly needed more space, and purchased 18 acres near Sebastopol on which he established the Gold Ridge Experimental Farm. He could plant large fields and was able to carry on even more extensive experiments with improvements to various crops through plant breeding, election and hybridization (Hoover, Rensch and Rensch 1970; Western Sonoma County Historical Society 2003). The cottage and three acres of the Gold Ridge Farm are now maintained by volunteers and is associated with the Western Sonoma County Historical Society.

An early connection was established with the completion of the Santa Rosa, Sebastapol & Green Valley Railroad, organized in 1887, and built as a standard gauge line from Santa Rosa to Sebastopol. The rail line was leased to the California Northwestern Railway in 1898 and sold to the Northwestern Railway Company in 1907 (Fickewirth 1992).

The City of Sebastopol was incorporated in 1902, reportedly with the main purpose of taking care of sewage problems. The City acquired land to build a sewage farm along the Laguna de Santa Rosa (Western Sonoma County Historical Society 2003).

In 1903, the Petaluma and Santa Rosa Railway Company was incorporated. The electric railway line was started in April of the following year and completed by October 1904. The route provided transportation for Sebastopol residents to Santa Rosa, connecting to points beyond, especially with overnight freight service to San Francisco. The railroad line provided a means of quickly getting produce, lumber and dairy products to a wider market, as well as a means for more efficiently getting goods to Sebastopol.

As with the electric railway systems in other areas, the automobile brought about the end of the system in the 1920s and 1930s. People preferred personal automobiles eliminating the passenger carrying needs, and trucking allowed the economical shipment and delivery of goods and products. The original wooden depot built is Sebastopol for the railway in 1904 and replaced in 1917 by a stucco and stone building. This building is currently the site of the West County Museum, preserving and interpreting the history of the region (Western Sonoma County Historical Society 2003).

RESEARCH

A record search was conducted for the project area at the Northwest California Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System on July 26, 2019 (NWIC File No.: 19-0151, Appendix 2). The project area has never been surveyed for cultural resources. There are no recorded sites within, or within a one-eighth mile radius of the project area although a home at 7691 Bodega Avenue near the project area was recorded during an inventory of historic period resources conducted for the City of Sebastopol in 1981 (Peterson and Peterson 1981).

NATIVE AMERICAN CONSULTATION

A letter was sent to the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) by Peak & Associates, Inc. requesting a check of the Sacred Lands files for the project site. A reply from that office was prepared on August 15, 2019 (Appendix 3). The NAHC letter indicated the results were negative for Sacred Lands but provided a list of eight groups to contact for the project site who may have information.

Letters requesting information on sites of concern within or near the project area were sent to the following groups listed by the NAHC on August 15, 2019 by Peak & Associates, Inc.: Patricia Hermosillo, Chairperson, Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians; Chris Wright, Chairperson, Dry Creek Rancheria of Pomo Indians; Gene Buvelot, Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria; Grey Sarris, Chairperson, Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria; Dino Franklin, Jr., Chairperson, Kashia Band of Pomo Indians of the Stewarts Point Rancheria; Marjorie Mejia, Chairperson, Lytton Rancheria; Jose Simon III, Chairperson, Middletown Rancheria; and, Scott Gabaldon, Chairperson, Mishewal-Wappo Tribe of Alexander Valley.

On August 23, 2019, Elaini Varga, Tribal Historic Preservation Office, Kashia band of Pomo Indians of the Stewarts Point rancheria replied via email saying that the project area was outside of their tribal territory and that the Tribe had no concerns or comments at this time (Appendix 3).

FIELD ASSESSMENT

Neal Neuenschwander completed a field survey of the project site on August 6, 2019, with a complete, intensive, inspection of the proposed project site, with transects no wider than ten meters (Figure 4). Ground visibility was generally good with the project generally area free of most vegetative cover due to weed control and agriculture (fruit trees and garden area). No prehistoric period cultural resources were discovered during the field effort.

The 1931 residence (7716 Bodega Avenue) and 1910 residence (7760 Bodega Avenue) and associated outbuildings have been recorded as historic period resources using the Department of Parks and Recreation 523 series form (Appendix 4). 12

Figure 4

RESOURCE DESCRIPTIONS

7716 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol

The complex contains a single-family home and three outbuildings located on an approximately 2.2 acres parcel. It is located to the east of 7760 Bodega Avenue and is therefore slightly closer to downtown Sebastopol.

The single-family home is single story, irregularly shaped with a cross-gable moderately steep pitched roof. The 1.431 square foot home was constructed in 1931 with renovations done a year later in 1932. The home is a Front-Facing Gable with Wing subtype of the Tudor Style that was popular between 1890 and 1940 (McAlester 2017:448-466).

The roof is covered with asphalt shingles and the sides are covered with stucco. The south facing façade of the home has an entry door nestled in a gable with a decorative Tudor arch encasing the entrance to the porch. The Tudor arch pattern is repeated with a grouping of three paired windows in the front-facing gable portion of the residence. A semi hexagonal one-story bay window is situated within the wing portion of the south facing façade of the building. Another typical Tudor Style element is a slightly decorative vergeboard.

The other facades of the home are plain with double sash windows. A rectangular-shaped extension with a shed roof is located on the northeastern portion of the building and may represent the 1932 renovation.

Building #1 is a single story, rectangular-shaped outbuilding that probably once served as a pumphouse. It has a low-pitched gable roof covered with sheet metal. The sides are covered with plywood.

Building #2 is a single, ‘L’-shaped outbuilding that apparently served as a storage shed. A fallen tree limb has recently damages part of the roof. The gable roof is covered with both wood shingles (main axis) and sheet metal (front gable). The sides are covered with both vertical board siding and sheet metal.

Building #3 is a single story, irregular shaped building that is utilized as a two-car garage. It has a gable roof that is covered with asphalt shingles and the sides are covered with stucco. There are two small extensions to the building along the east facing façade at the north and south corners.

7760 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol

The complex contains a single- family home, three outbuildings, and a modern portable shed located on an approximately 1.35-acre parcel.

The single-family home is single story, irregular-shaped with a cross gable moderately pitched roof. The 1,300 square foot home was constructed in 1910 with renovations completed in 1954. The home is National Folk Style, Gable-Front and Wing Family that was popular between 1850 and 1930 (McAlester 2017:134-147).

The roof is covered with asphalt shingles and the sides are covered with shiplap siding and rolled, decorative asphalt. Windows are both fixed and double sash divided vertically. The south facing façade has a small gable roof covered entryway and enclosed porch area along the southwestern portion. There is a shed roof extension along the northeast portion of the building.

Building #2 is a single story, rectangular-shaped outbuilding that was apparently originally used for raising chickens (chicken coop). The shed roof is covered with asphalt shingles and the sides are covered with horizontal wood boards. There are a series of (modern aluminum) windows and openings with hinges along the south facing axis that probably once were screen covered and open on occasion to allow for air flow.

Building #3 is a single story, rectangular-shaped outbuilding that serves as a garage and small shop. It has a moderately pitched gable roof that is covered with asphalt shingles. The sides are covered with shiplap siding.

RESOURCE EVALUATIONS

7716 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol

The residence is the most common of the eight subtypes of American-style Tudor Homes, representing about 40 percent of the total (McAlester 2017:449). The stylistic elements incorporated into the design are certainly attractive, but common for the style. The residence lacks a great many of the high style decorative elements probably due to the period it was constructed (Depression era). The building is not outstanding architecturally in terms of the Tudor Style.

There are no known associations with important events or people (NRHP Criterion A and B), with the original ownership of the residence unknown. The building is not particularly representative of a distinctive type or period. The building is not an outstanding representative of the Tudor Style of residential architectural style (NRHP Criterion C).

There is no possibility for buried archeological deposits related to the relatively late historic period occupancy of the area (NRHP Criterion D).

7760 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol

The residence is a common example of the National Style Gable-Front and Wing Family type home that were constructed in great numbers in the West, particularly with the assistance of railroads that were able to move the precut lumber needed to construct these homes. It does not possess stylistic architectural or decorative elements that elevate it above the common form.

There are no known associations with important events or people (NRHP Criterion A and B), with the original ownership of the residence unknown. The building is not particularly representative of a distinctive type or period. The building is not an outstanding representative of the National Folk Style of residential architectural style (NRHP Criterion C).

There is no possibility for buried archeological deposits related to the relatively late historic period occupancy of the area (NRHP Criterion D).

EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT

As a result of the identification and evaluation efforts, an agency official may find that there are no historic properties present or there are historic properties present but the undertaking will have no effect upon them as defined in Section 800.16 (i).

If the agency official finds there are historic properties that may be affected by the undertaking, the agency official shall apply the criteria of adverse effect. “An adverse effect is found when an undertaking may alter, directly or indirectly, any of the characteristics of a historic property that qualify the property for inclusion in the National Register in a manner that would diminish the integrity of the property's location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling or association” (Section 800.5 (a)).

There are three possible findings:

• Finding of no historic properties affected: There is no effect of any kind on the historic properties.

• Finding of no adverse effect: There could be an effect, but the effect would not be harmful to the characteristics that qualify the property for inclusion in the National Register; or

• Adverse effect: There could be an effect, and that effect could diminish the integrity of such characteristics.

There were no historic properties recorded within the project area. With regard to Section 106 of the NHPA, it is recommended that the agency seek concurrence from the California SHPO with a finding of “no historic properties affected” per § 800.4(d) (1).

For the purposes of CEQA, we conclude that there will be no impact to important cultural resources from implementation of the project.

RECOMMENDATIONS

There is always a possibility that a site may exist in the project area and be obscured by vegetation, siltation or historic activities, leaving no surface evidence. If artifacts, exotic rock, shell or bone are uncovered during the construction, work should stop in that area immediately. A qualified archeologist should be contacted to examine and evaluate the deposit.

Discovery of Human Remains

In the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains in any location other than a dedicated cemetery, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area suspected to overlie adjacent remains until the Sonoma County Coroner has determined that the remains are not subject to any provisions of law concerning investigation of the circumstances, manner and cause of death, and the recommendations concerning the treatment and disposition of the human remains have been made to the person responsible for the excavation, or to his or her authorized representative. The coroner shall make his or her determination within two working days from the time the person responsible for the excavation, or his or her authorized representative, notifies the coroner of the discovery or recognition of the human remains.

If the Sonoma County Coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his or her authority and if the Coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American, or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC).

REFERENCES

Barrett, Samuel A. 1908 The Ethnogeography of the Pomo and Neighboring Indians. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 6(1):1-332. Berkeley.

Fickewirth, Alvin A. 1992 California Railroads. Golden West Books, San Marino, California.

Gudde, Edwin G. 1969 California Place Names. University of California Press, Berkeley.

Hoover, Mildred, Hero E. Rensch, Ethel G. Rensch and William N. Abeloe 1990 Historic Spots in California (Fourth Edition). Stanford University Press, Stanford.

Kroeber, Alfred L. 1925 Handbook of the Indians of California. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 78. Washington, D.C.

McLendon, Sally, and Robert L. Oswalt 1978 Pomo. In California, edited by Robert F. Heizer, pp. 275-288. Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 8, William G. Sturtevant, general editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

Peterson, Dan, and Geraldine Peterson 1981 Final Report Western Sonoma County Historic Resource Survey. Ms. On file, Northwest Information Center, California Historical Resources Information System, California State University, Sonoma.

Western Sonoma County Historical Society 2003 Images of America: Sebastopol. Arcadia Publishing, Charleston, SC.

APPENDIX 1

Resumes

PEAK & ASSOCIATES, INC. RESUME

MELINDA A. PEAK January 2019 Senior Historian/Archeologist 3941 Park Drive, Suite 20 #329 El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 (916) 939-2405

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

Ms. Peak has served as the principal investigator on a wide range of prehistoric and historic excavations throughout California. She has directed laboratory analyses of archeological materials, including the historic period. She has also conducted a wide variety of cultural resource assessments in California, including documentary research, field survey, Native American consultation and report preparation.

In addition, Ms. Peak has developed a second field of expertise in applied history, specializing in site- specific research for historic period resources. She is a registered professional historian and has completed a number of historical research projects for a wide variety of site types.

Through her education and experience, Ms. Peak meets the Secretary of Interior Standards for historian, architectural historian, prehistoric archeologist and historic archeologist.

EDUCATION

M.A. - History - California State University, Sacramento, 1989 Thesis: The Bellevue Mine: A Historical Resources Management Site Study in Plumas and Sierra Counties, California B.A. - Anthropology - University of California, Berkeley

RECENT PROJECTS

Ms. Peak completed the cultural resource research and contributed to the text prepared for the DeSabla-Centerville PAD for the initial stage of the FERC relicensing. She also served cultural resource project manager for the FERC relicensing of the Beardsley-Donnells Project. For the South Feather Power Project and the Woodleaf-Palermo and Sly Creek Transmission Lines, her team completing the technical work for the project.

In recent months, Ms. Peak has completed several determinations of eligibility and effect documents in coordination with the Corps of Engineers for projects requiring federal permits, assessing the eligibility of a number of sites for the National Register of Historic Places. She has also completed historical research projects on a wide variety of topics for a number of projects

including the development of navigation and landings on the Napa River, farmhouses dating to the 1860s, bridges, an early roadhouse, Folsom Dam and a section of an electric railway line.

In recent years, Ms. Peak has prepared a number of cultural resource overviews and predictive models for blocks of land proposed for future development for general and specific plans. She has been able to direct a number of surveys of these areas, allowing the model to be tested.

She served as principal investigator for the multi-phase Twelve Bridges Golf Club project in Placer County. She served as liaison with the various agencies, helped prepare the historic properties treatment plan, managed the various phases of test and data recovery excavations, and completed the final report on the analysis of the test phase excavations of a number of prehistoric sites. She is currently involved as the principal investigator for the Clover Valley Lakes project adjacent to Twelve Bridges in the City of Rocklin, coordinating contacts with Native Americans, the Corps of Engineers and the Office of Historic Preservation.

Ms. Peak has served as project manager for a number of major survey and excavation projects in recent years, including the many surveys and site definition excavations for the 172-mile-long Pacific Pipeline proposed for construction in Santa Barbara, Ventura and Los Angeles counties. She also completed an archival study in the City of Los Angeles for the project. She also served as principal investigator for a major coaxial cable removal project for AT&T.

Additionally, she completed a number of small surveys, served as a construction monitor at several urban sites, and conducted emergency recovery excavations for sites found during monitoring. She has directed the excavations of several historic complexes in Sacramento, Placer and El Dorado Counties.

Ms. Peak is the author of a chapter and two sections of a published history (1999) of Sacramento County, Sacramento: Gold Rush Legacy, Metropolitan Legacy. She served as the consultant for a children’s book on California, published by Capstone Press in 2003 in the land of Liberty series.

PEAK & ASSOCIATES, INC. RESUME

NEAL J. NEUENSCHWANDER January 2019 Staff Archeologist 3941 Park Drive, Suite 20-329 3161 Godman Ave., Suite A El Dorado Hills, CA 95672 Chico, CA 95973 (916) 939-2405 (530) 342-2800

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

Mr. Neuenschwander has compiled an excellent record of supervision of excavation and survey projects for both the public and private sectors over the past forty years. He has supervised the fieldwork of over 1,700 projects throughout California, Oregon, Nevada, and southern Idaho.

EDUCATION

M.A. candidate - Anthropology - California State University, Chico, 1981-1983 B.A. - Anthropology - California State University, Chico (with distinction), 1981 B.A. - Geography - California State University, Chico (with distinction), 1981

RECENT PROJECTS

Mr. Neuenschwander manages the North Valley office of Peak & Associates, located in Chico, California.

Neuenschwander's duties at Peak & Associates have included the field direction for multiple site excavations and surveys throughout northern, central, and southern California, Nevada, Oregon and Idaho. In this capacity, he has been responsible for the planning and implementation of every aspect of the fieldwork, analysis, and report production phases. During his twenty-five years with the company, he has developed a reputation for his ability to complete projects on-time and within budget parameters, while at the same time maximizing the recovery and analysis of data for the professional community.

Neuenschwander assisted in the cultural resource research and contributed to the text prepared for the DeSabla-Centerville PAD. He is also currently assisting the cultural resource project manager in the completion of studies for the FERC re-licensing of the South Feather Power Project and the Woodleaf-Palermo and Sly Creek Transmission Lines. He led the fieldwork effort, and completed site recordation and evaluation.

Notable projects under Neuenschwander's direction include the nine-week excavation at Clarks Flat in Calaveras County, eleven weeks with a crew of over twenty technicians at the Upper Mountain locale (a remote camp six miles from the nearest road), ten weeks of an over 9,000-acre survey at Elk

Hills Naval Petroleum Reserve, and a two-phase excavation at CA-PLU-88, a site that contained radiocarbon evidence of the some of the earliest inhabitation of the Sierra Nevada Mountains.

Mr. Neuenschwander also served as the field director for multiple phases of recordation, testing and evaluation for the 172-mile-long Pacific Pipeline Project proposed for construction in Santa Barbara, Ventura, and Los Angeles counties. He also has served as field director or co-director on a number of AT&T fiber optic projects throughout California, Oregon and Idaho.

In recent years, Neuenschwander has been involved with a number of Caltrans funded and reviewed projects throughout the area, completing surveys, Native American consultation, site testing and assisting in report preparation. He has also contributed his skills during the recordation and evaluation of a number of historic buildings including Rocklin City Hall and Taylor Hall on the California State University, Chico campus.

Mr. Neuenschwander has extensive experience with Placer County’s varied cultural resources including serving Field Director during the testing and evaluation of resources at Twelve Bridges Golf Club, and at Clover Valley. He led the team that identified more than 20 additional cultural resources in the Clover Valley property that had been twice inspected by archeologists.

APPENDIX 2

Record Search

7/26/2019 NWIC File No.: 19-0151

Neal Neuenschwander Peak & Associates, Inc. 3161 Godman Avenue Chico, CA 95973

re: 7760/7716 Bodega Avenue Project

The Northwest Information Center received your record search request for the project area referenced above, located on the Sebastopol USGS 7.5’ quad. The following reflects the results of the records search for the project area and a 1/8th mile radius:

Resources within project area: None

Resources within 1/8th mile None radius: Reports within project area: None

Reports within 1/8th mile radius: S-38337 & 2615.

Resource Database Printout (list): ☐ enclosed ☐ not requested ☒ nothing listed Resource Database Printout (details): ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Resource Digital Database Records: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Database Printout (list): ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Database Printout (details): ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Digital Database Records: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Resource Record Copies: ☐ enclosed ☐ not requested ☒ nothing listed Report Copies: ☐ enclosed ☐ not requested ☒ nothing listed OHP Historic Properties Directory: ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility: ☐ enclosed ☐ not requested ☒ nothing listed CA Inventory of Historic Resources (1976): ☐ enclosed ☐ not requested ☒ nothing listed Caltrans Bridge Survey: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Ethnographic Information: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Historical Literature: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Historical Maps: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Local Inventories: ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed GLO and/or Rancho Plat Maps: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Shipwreck Inventory: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed

*Notes: ** Current versions of these resources are available on‐line: Caltrans Bridge Survey: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/structur/strmaint/historic.htm Soil Survey: http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/surveylist/soils/survey/state/?stateld=CA Shipwreck Inventory: http://www.slc.ca.gov/Info/Shipwrecks.html

Please forward a copy of any resulting reports from this project to the office as soon as possible. Due to the sensitive nature of archaeological site location data, we ask that you do not include resource location maps and resource location descriptions in your report if the report is for public distribution. If you have any questions regarding the results presented herein, please contact the office at the phone number listed above.

The provision of CHRIS Data via this records search response does not in any way constitute public disclosure of records otherwise exempt from disclosure under the California Public Records Act or any other law, including, but not limited to, records related to archeological site information maintained by or on behalf of, or in the possession of, the State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation, State Historic Preservation Officer, Office of Historic Preservation, or the State Historical Resources Commission.

Due to processing delays and other factors, not all of the historical resource reports and resource records that have been submitted to the Office of Historic Preservation are available via this records search. Additional information may be available through the federal, state, and local agencies that produced or paid for historical resource management work in the search area. Additionally, Native American tribes have historical resource information not in the CHRIS Inventory, and you should contact the California Native American Heritage Commission for information on local/regional tribal contacts.

Should you require any additional information for the above referenced project, reference the record search number listed above when making inquiries. Requests made after initial invoicing will result in the preparation of a separate invoice.

Thank you for using the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS).

Sincerely,

Lisa C. Hagel Researcher 7760/7716 Bodega Avenue Project

SEBASTOPOL 7.5'

Sonoma

S-002615 S-038337 [approx loc]

Northwest Information Center File #19-0151, 26 July 2019, L. Hagel May depict confidential cultural resource locations. Do not distribute. Feet 0 200 400 600 800

0 30 60 90 120 150 Meters

APPENDIX 3

Consultation

STATE OF CALIFORNIA GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION Cultural and Environmental Department 1550 Harbor Blvd., Suite 100 West Sacramento, CA 95691 Phone: (916) 373-3710 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.nahc.ca.gov Twitter: @CA_NAHC

August 15, 2019

Neal Neuenschwander Peak & Associates

VIA Email to: [email protected]

RE: 7760/7716 Bodega Avenue Project, Sonoma County

Dear Mr. Neuenschwander:

A record search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) was completed for the information you have submitted for the above referenced project. The results were negative. However, the absence of specific site information in the SLF does not indicate the absence of cultural resources in any project area. Other sources of cultural resources should also be contacted for information regarding known and recorded sites.

Attached is a list of Native American tribes who may also have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. This list should provide a starting place in locating areas of potential adverse impact within the proposed project area. I suggest you contact all of those indicated; if they cannot supply information, they might recommend others with specific knowledge. By contacting all those listed, your organization will be better able to respond to claims of failure to consult with the appropriate tribe. If a response has not been received within two weeks of notification, the Commission requests that you follow-up with a telephone call or email to ensure that the project information has been received.

If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify the NAHC. With your assistance, we can assure that our lists contain current information. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at my email address: [email protected].

Sincerely,

Steven Quinn Associate Governmental Program Analyst

Attachment Native American Heritage Commission

Native American Contacts List 8/15/2019

Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians Lytton Rancheria Patricia Hermosillo, Chairperson Marjorie Mejia, Chairperson 555 S. Cloverdale Blvd., Suite A Pomo 437 Aviation Blvd. Pomo Cloverdale ,CA 95425 Santa Rosa ,CA 95403 [email protected] [email protected] (707) 894-5775 (707) 575-5917 (707) 894-5727 (707) 575-6974 - Fax

Dry Creek Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians Middletown Rancheria Chris Wright, Chairperson Jose Simon III, Chairperson P.O. Box 607 Pomo P.O. Box 1035 Pomo Geyserville ,CA 95441 Middletown ,CA 95461 Lake Miwok [email protected] [email protected] (707) 522-4233 (707) 987-3670 Office (707) 522-4286 (707) 987-9091 Fax

Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria Mishewal-Wappo Tribe of Alexander Valley Gene Buvelot Scott Gabaldon, Chairperson 6400 Redwood Drive, Ste 300 Coast Miwok 2275 Silk Road Wappo Rohnert Park ,CA 94928 Southern Pomo Windsor ,CA 95492 [email protected] [email protected] (415) 279-4844 Cell (707) 494-9159 (707) 566-2288 ext 103

Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria Greg Sarris, Chairperson 6400 Redwood Drive, Ste 300 Coast Miwok Rohnert Park ,CA 94928 Southern Pomo [email protected] (707) 566-2288 Office (707) 566-2291 Fax

Kashia Band of Pomo Indians of the Stewarts Point Rancheri Dinoa Franklin Jr.,Chairperson 1420 Guerneville Rd. Ste 1 Pomo Santa Rosa ,CA 95403 [email protected] (707) 591-0580 Office (707) 591-0583 Fax

This list is current as of the date of this document and is based on the information available to the Commission on the date it was produced.

Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code,Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code, or Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code.

This list is only applicable for contacting local Native Americans Tribes for the proposed: 7760/7716 Bodega Avenue Project.

PEAK & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ARCHEOLOGY

August 15, 2019

Patricia Hermosillo, Chairperson Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians 555 S. Cloverdale Blvd., Suite A Cloverdale, CA 95425

Subject: 7760/7716 Bodega Avenue, City of Sebastopol Project, Sonoma County, California.

Dear Honorable Chairperson Hermosillo,

The 7760/7716 Bodega Avenue, City of Sebastopol Project is an income-assisted housing complex proposed to be developed on a roughly four-acre parcel located at 7716 and 7760 Bodega Avenue in the City of Sebastopol (please see attached topographic map of project area). A record search through CHRIS NWIC revealed no identified prehistoric or historic period resources within the proposed project area or one-eighth mile. I inspected the proposed project area on August 6, 2019 and found no prehistoric period resources.

If you have any information concerning cultural resources that may be impacted by the proposed development, or wish to have input or comment on the proposed 7760/7716 Bodega Avenue, City of Sebastopol Project, please don’t hesitate to contact me, Neal Neuenschwander, Staff Archeologist, Peak & Associates, Inc., 3161 Godman Avenue, Chico, CA 95973, (530) 342-2800, [email protected] Thank you for your time reviewing this letter and attached topographic map of the project area.

Sincerely,

Neal Neuenschwander Staff Archeologist

Enc. USGS topographic map

• 3941 Park Drive, Suite 20#329, El Dorado Hills, CA 95762/Phone: (916)939-2405/[email protected] • 3161 Godman Avenue, Suite A, Chico, CA 95973/Phone: (530)342-2800/ [email protected]

PEAK & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ARCHEOLOGY

August 15, 2019

Chris Wright, Chairperson Dry Creek Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians P.O. Box 607 Dry Creek, CA 95441

Subject: 7760/7716 Bodega Avenue, City of Sebastopol Project, Sonoma County, California.

Dear Honorable Chairperson Wright,

Sincerely,

Neal Neuenschwander Staff Archeologist

Enc. USGS topographic map

• 3941 Park Drive, Suite 20#329, El Dorado Hills, CA 95762/Phone: (916)939-2405/[email protected] • 3161 Godman Avenue, Suite A, Chico, CA 95973/Phone: (530)342-2800/ [email protected]

PEAK & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ARCHEOLOGY

August 15, 2019

Greg Sarris, Chairperson Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria 6400 Redwood Drive, Suite 300 Rohnert Park, CA 94928

Subject: 7760/7716 Bodega Avenue, City of Sebastopol Project, Sonoma County, California.

Dear Honorable Chairperson Sarris,

Sincerely,

Neal Neuenschwander Staff Archeologist

Enc. USGS topographic map

• 3941 Park Drive, Suite 20#329, El Dorado Hills, CA 95762/Phone: (916)939-2405/[email protected] • 3161 Godman Avenue, Suite A, Chico, CA 95973/Phone: (530)342-2800/ [email protected]

PEAK & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ARCHEOLOGY

August 15, 2019

Gene Buvelot Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria 6400 Redwood Drive, Suite 300 Rohnert Park, CA 94928

Subject: 7760/7716 Bodega Avenue, City of Sebastopol Project, Sonoma County, California.

Dear Mr. Buvelot,

Sincerely,

Neal Neuenschwander Staff Archeologist

Enc. USGS topographic map

• 3941 Park Drive, Suite 20#329, El Dorado Hills, CA 95762/Phone: (916)939-2405/[email protected] • 3161 Godman Avenue, Suite A, Chico, CA 95973/Phone: (530)342-2800/ [email protected]

PEAK & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ARCHEOLOGY

August 15, 2019

Dino Franklin, Jr., Chairperson Kashia Band of Pomo Indians of the Stewarts Point Rancheria 1420 Guerneville Road, Suite 1 Santa Rosa, CA 95403

Subject: 7760/7716 Bodega Avenue, City of Sebastopol Project, Sonoma County, California.

Dear Honorable Chairperson Franklin, Jr.,

Sincerely,

Neal Neuenschwander Staff Archeologist

Enc. USGS topographic map

• 3941 Park Drive, Suite 20#329, El Dorado Hills, CA 95762/Phone: (916)939-2405/[email protected] • 3161 Godman Avenue, Suite A, Chico, CA 95973/Phone: (530)342-2800/ [email protected]

PEAK & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ARCHEOLOGY

August 15, 2019

Marjorie Mejia, Chairperson Lytton Rancheria 437 Aviation Boulevard Santa Rosa, CA 95403

Subject: 7760/7716 Bodega Avenue, City of Sebastopol Project, Sonoma County, California.

Dear Honorable Chairperson Mejia,

Sincerely,

Neal Neuenschwander Staff Archeologist

Enc. USGS topographic map

• 3941 Park Drive, Suite 20#329, El Dorado Hills, CA 95762/Phone: (916)939-2405/[email protected] • 3161 Godman Avenue, Suite A, Chico, CA 95973/Phone: (530)342-2800/ [email protected]

PEAK & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ARCHEOLOGY

August 15, 2019

Jose Simon III, Chairperson Middletown Rancheria P.O. Box 1035 Middletown, CA 95461

Subject: 7760/7716 Bodega Avenue, City of Sebastopol Project, Sonoma County, California.

Dear Honorable Chairperson Simon III,

Sincerely,

Neal Neuenschwander Staff Archeologist

Enc. USGS topographic map

• 3941 Park Drive, Suite 20#329, El Dorado Hills, CA 95762/Phone: (916)939-2405/[email protected] • 3161 Godman Avenue, Suite A, Chico, CA 95973/Phone: (530)342-2800/ [email protected]

PEAK & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ARCHEOLOGY

August 15, 2019

Scott Gabaldon, Chairperson Mishewal-Wappo Tribe of Alexander Valley 2275 Silk Road Windsor, CA 95492

Subject: 7760/7716 Bodega Avenue, City of Sebastopol Project, Sonoma County, California.

Dear Honorable Chairperson Gabaldon,

Sincerely,

Neal Neuenschwander Staff Archeologist

Enc. USGS topographic map

• 3941 Park Drive, Suite 20#329, El Dorado Hills, CA 95762/Phone: (916)939-2405/[email protected] • 3161 Godman Avenue, Suite A, Chico, CA 95973/Phone: (530)342-2800/ [email protected]

Neal,

The proposed project at 7760/7716 Bodega Ave. Sebastopol Sonoma County is out of the Aboriginal Territory of the Stewarts Point Rancheria Kashia Band of Pomo Indians.

We do not have any concerns or comments at this time.

Thank you,

Elaini Vargas Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Kashia Band of Pomo Indians 1420 Guerneville Road, Suite 1 Santa Rosa, CA 95403

Email: [email protected] Office: 707-591-0580 Ext 105

APPENDIX 4

Resource Records

State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 15 *Resource Name or #: 7716 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location:  Not for Publication X Unrestricted *a. County: Sonoma and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Sebastopol, Calif. Date: 1954(1980) T 6N; R 9W; ¼ of ¼ of Sec ; M.D. B.M. c. Address: 7716 Bodega Avenue City: Sebastopol Zip: 95472 d. UTM: Zone: 10 ; mE/ mN (G.P.S.) e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) Elevation: The resource is located along the north side of Bodega Avenue approximately one-half mile west of downtown Sebastopol (Main Street). *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) The complex contains a single-family home and three outbuildings located on an approximately 2.2 acres parcel. The single-family home is single story, irregularly-shaped with a cross-gable moderately steep pitched roof. The 1.431 square foot home was constructed in 1931 with renovations done a year later in 1932. The home is a Front-Facing Gable with Wing subtype of the Tudor Style that was popular between 1890 and 1940 (McAlester 2017:448-466).

Building #1 is a single story, rectangular-shaped outbuilding that probably once served as a pumphouse. It has a low-pitched gable roof covered with sheet metal. The sides are covered with plywood. Building #2 is a single, ‘L’-shaped outbuilding that apparently served as a storage shed. A fallen tree limb has recently damages part of the roof. The gable roof is covered with both wood shingles (main axis) and sheet metal (front gable). The sides are covered with both vertical board siding and sheet metal. Building #3 is a single story, irregular shaped building that is utilized as a two-car garage. It has a gable roof that is covered with asphalt shingles and the sides are covered with stucco. There are two small extensions to the building along the east facing façade at the north and south corners.

*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 – Single Family Property *P4. Resources Present: X Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) P5b. Description of Photo: (View, date, accession #) View looking northeast toward the west and south facing sides of the residence. 8-6-19. Acc. #201908fr1230. *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: X Historic 1931/32 Prehistoric Both Somona County Assessors Office Records *P7. Owner and Address: Unknown *P8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation, and address) Neal Neuenschwander, Peak & Associates, Inc. 3161 Godman Avenue, Chico, CA 95973 *P9. Date Recorded: 8-6-19 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Complete, intensive *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Determination of Eligibility and Effect for the Woodmark Apartments Project, City of Sebastopol, Sonoma County, California. Peak & Associates, Inc. 2019

*Attachments: NONE X Location Map X Sketch Map X Continuation Sheet X Building, Structure, and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record  Other (List): DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD Page 2 of 15 *NRHP Status Code 6Z *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 7716 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol

B1. Historic Name: B2. Common Name: B3. Original Use: Single family residence B4. Present Use: Same *B5. Architectural Style: Tudor, Front-Facing Gable with Wing subtype *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) 1931 with renovations done in 1932 (County of Sonoma Assessors Office records).

*B7. Moved? X No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features: Three outbuildings.

B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Unknown *B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: North Coast Region, California Period of Significance: 1900-1969 Property Type: Single family residence Applicable Criteria: a-d (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) The residence is the most common of the eight subtypes of American-style Tudor Homes, representing about 40 percent of the total (McAlester 2017:449). The stylistic elements incorporated into the design are certainly attractive, but common for the style. The residence lacks a great many of the high style decorative elements probably due to the period it was constructed (Depression era). The building is not outstanding architecturally in terms of the Tudor Style. There are no known associations with important events or people (NRHP Criterion A and B), with the original ownership of the residence unknown. The building is not particularly representative of a distinctive type or period. The building is not an outstanding representative of the Tudor Style of residential architectural style (NRHP Criterion C).

There is no possibility for buried archeological deposits related to the relatively late historic period occupancy of the area (NRHP Criterion D).

B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes)

*B12. References: County of Sonoma Assessors Office records

B13. Remarks:

*B14. Evaluator: Melinda Peak

*Date of Evaluation: August 2019

(This space reserved for official comments.)

DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information

State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 15 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 7716 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol *Recorded by: Neal Neuenschwander *Date: 8-6-19 X Continuation  Update

A) View looking north, northeast of the west and south facing facades of the residence. 8-6-19. Acc. #201708fr1231

B) View looking northeast of the west and south facing facades of the residence. Building #3 center left 8-6-19. Acc.#201908fr1232 DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 4 of 15 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 7716 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol *Recorded by: Neal Neuenschwander *Date: 8-6-19 X Continuation  Update

C) View looking east of the west facing facade of the residence. 8-6-19. Acc. #201708fr1249

D) View looking southeast of the north and partial west facing facades of the residence. 8-6-19. Acc. 3201708fr1255 DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 5 of 15 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 7716 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol *Recorded by: Neal Neuenschwander *Date: 8-6-19 X Continuation  Update

E) View looking south of the north facing facade of the residence. 8-6-19. Acc. #201708fr1256

F) View looking southeast of the northeast portion of the residence, possible 1932 renovation area lower left. 8-6-19. Acc. 3201708fr1258 DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 6 of 15 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 7716 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol *Recorded by: Neal Neuenschwander *Date: 8-6-19 X Continuation  Update

G) View looking east of the west facing facade of the northeast portion of the residence, possible 1932 renovation area. 8-6-19. Acc. #201708fr1260

H) View looking west of the east facing facade of the residence. 8-6-19. Acc. 3201708fr1259 DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 7 of 15 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 7716 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol *Recorded by: Neal Neuenschwander *Date: 8-6-19 X Continuation  Update

I) View looking southwest of the southern portion of the east facing facade of the residence. 8-6-19. Acc. #201708fr1241

J) View looking west of the northern portion of the east facing facade of the residence, possible 1932 renovation area. 8-6-19. Acc. 3201708fr1242 DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 8 of 15 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 7716 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol *Recorded by: Neal Neuenschwander *Date: 8-6-19 X Continuation  Update

K) View looking northwest of the east facing facade of the residence, concrete steps, center right. 8-6-19. Acc. #201708fr1243

L) View looking north of the concrete steps located near the east facing facade of the residence. 8-6-19. Acc. 3201708fr1239 DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 9 of 15 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 7716 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol *Recorded by: Neal Neuenschwander *Date: 8-6-19 X Continuation  Update

M) View looking north of the western portion of the south facing facade of the residence. 8-6-19. Acc. #201708fr1246

N) View looking north of the eastern portion of the south facing facade of the residence. 8-6-19. Acc. 3201708fr1245 DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 10 of 15 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 7716 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol *Recorded by: Neal Neuenschwander *Date: 8-6-19 X Continuation  Update

O) View looking northeast of the west and south facing facades of Building #1. 8-6-19. Acc. #201708fr1253

P) View looking northwest of the south and east facing facades of Building #1. 8-6-19. Acc. 3201708fr1212 DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 11 of 15 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 7716 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol *Recorded by: Neal Neuenschwander *Date: 8-6-19 X Continuation  Update

Q) View looking southwest of the partial east and north facing facades of Building #2. Acc. #201708fr1219

R) View looking west of the south and partial east facing facades of Building #2. 8-6-19. Acc. 3201708fr1222 DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 12 of 15 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 7716 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol *Recorded by: Neal Neuenschwander *Date: 8-6-19 X Continuation  Update

S) View looking northeast of the west and south facing facades of Building #3. 8-6-19. Acc. #201708fr1250

T) View looking northwest of the south and partial east facing facades of Building #3. 8-6-19. Acc. 3201708fr1240 DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 13 of 15 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 7716 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol *Recorded by: Neal Neuenschwander *Date: 8-6-19 X Continuation  Update

U) View looking west of the east facing facade of Building #3. 8-6-19. Acc. #201708fr1217

V) View looking southwest of the east facing facade of Building #3. 8-6-19. Acc. 3201708fr1214 DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# SKETCH MAP Trinomial Page 14 of 15 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 7716 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol *Drawn By: Neal Neuenschwander *Date 8-6-19

DPR 523K (1/95) *Required information State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# LOCATION MAP Trinomial Page 15 of 15 *Resource Name or #: 7716 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol *Map Name: Sebastopol, Calif. *Scale: 1:24,000 *Date of Map: 1954 (1980)

DPR 523J (1/95) *Required information State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 12 *Resource Name or #: 7760 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol

P1. Other Identifier: *P2. Location:  Not for Publication X Unrestricted *a. County: Sonoma and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Sebastopol, Calif. Date: 1954 (1980) T 6N; R 9W ; ¼ of ¼ of Sec ; M.D.B.M. c. Address: 7760 Bodega Avenue City: Sebastopol Zip: 95472 d. UTM: Zone: 10 mE/ mN (G.P.S.) e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) Elevation: 160 Feet (approx.). The resource is located along the north side of Bodega Avenue approximately one-half mile west of downtown Sebastopol (Main Street).

*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) The complex contains a single- family home, three outbuildings, and a modern portable shed located on an approximately 1.35- acre parcel. The single-family home is single story, irregular-shaped with a cross gable moderately pitched roof. The 1,300 square foot home was constructed in 1910 with renovations completed in 1954. The home is National Folk Style, Gable-Front and Wing Family that was popular between 1850 and 1930 (McAlester 2017:134-147).

Building #1is a single story, rectangular-shaped outbuilding apparently used for storage. It has a shed roof covered with asphalt shingles and the sides are covered with vertical board-and-batten wood boards. Building #2 is a single story, rectangular-shaped outbuilding that was apparently originally used for raising chickens (chicken coop). The shed roof is covered with asphalt shingles and the sides are covered with horizontal wood boards. There are a series of (modern aluminum) windows and openings with hinges along the south facing axis that probably once were screen covered and open on occasion to allow for air flow. Building #3 is a single story, rectangular-shaped outbuilding that serves as a garage and small shop. It has a moderately pitched gable roof that is covered with asphalt shingles. The sides are covered with shiplap siding.

*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 – Single Family Property *P4. Resources Present: X Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) P5b. Description of Photo: (View, date, accession #) View looking northeast toward the west and south facing sides of the residence. 8-6-19. Acc. #201908fr1194. *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: XHistoric – 1910/1954 Prehistoric Both Somona County Assessors Office Records *P7. Owner and Address: Unknown *P8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation, and address) Neal Neuenschwander, Peak & Associates, Inc. 3161 Godman Avenue, Chico, CA 95973 *P9. Date Recorded: 8-6-19 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Complete, intensive. *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Determination of Eligibility and Effect for the Woodmark Apartments Project, City of Sebastopol, Sonoma County, California. Peak & Associates, Inc. 2019

*Attachments: NONE X Location Map X Sketch Map X Continuation Sheet X Building, Structure, and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record  Other (List): DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD Page 2 of 12 *NRHP Status Code 6Z *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 7760 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol

B1. Historic Name: B2. Common Name: B3. Original Use: Single family residence B4. Present Use: Same *B5. Architectural Style: National Folk Style, Gable-Front and Wing Family subtype *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) 1910 with renovations done in 1954

*B7. Moved? X No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features: Three outbuildings, circular concrete water feature.

B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Unknown *B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: North Coast Region, California Period of Significance: 1900-1969 Property Type: Single family residence Applicable Criteria: a-d (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) The residence is a common example of the National Style Gable-Front and Wing Family type home that were constructed in great numbers in the West, particularly with the assistance of railroads that were able to move the precut lumber needed to construct these homes. It does not possess stylistic architectural or decorative elements that elevate it above the common form. There are no known associations with important events or people (NRHP Criterion A and B), with the original ownership of the residence unknown. The building is not particularly representative of a distinctive type or period. The building is not an outstanding representative of the National Folk Style of residential architectural style (NRHP Criterion C).

There is no possibility for buried archeological deposits related to the relatively late historic period occupancy of the area (NRHP Criterion D).

B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes)

*B12. References: County of Sonoma Assessor’s Office

B13. Remarks:

*B14. Evaluator: Melinda Peak

*Date of Evaluation: August 2019

(This space reserved for official comments.)

DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information

State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 12 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 7760 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol *Recorded by: Neal Neuenschwander *Date: 8-6-19 X Continuation  Update

A) View looking north, northeast of the south and partial west facing facades of the residence. 8-6-19. Acc. #201708fr1192

B) View looking northwest of the partial south facing façade, entryway. 8-6-19. Acc. #201908fr1191 DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 4 of 12 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 7760 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol *Recorded by: Neal Neuenschwander *Date: 8-6-19 X Continuation  Update

C) View looking northeast of the front gable and enclosed porch area of the residence. 8-6-19. Acc. #201708fr1195

D) View looking east of the front gable and enclosed porch area of the residence . 8-6-19. Acc. #201908fr1196 DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 5 of 12 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 7760 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol *Recorded by: Neal Neuenschwander *Date: 8-6-19 X Continuation  Update

E) View looking east of the west facing facade of the residence. 8-6-19. Acc. #201708fr1197

F) View looking south of the north facing facade of the residence . 8-6-19. Acc. #201908fr1208 DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 6 of 12 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 7760 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol *Recorded by: Neal Neuenschwander *Date: 8-6-19 X Continuation  Update

G) View looking west of the east facing facade of the residence. 8-6-19. Acc. #201708fr1187

H) View looking west, northwest of the east facing facade of the residence . 8-6-19. Acc. #201908fr1190 DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 7 of 12 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 7760 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol *Recorded by: Neal Neuenschwander *Date: 8-6-19 X Continuation  Update

I) View looking northwest of the south facing facade of the residence, entryway. 8-6-19. Acc. #201708fr1191

J) View looking southeast of a concrete water feature located south of the residence, Bodega Avenue in background. 8-6-19. Acc. #201908fr1193 DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 8 of 12 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 7760 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol *Recorded by: Neal Neuenschwander *Date: 8-6-19 X Continuation  Update

K) View looking north of the south facing facade of Building #1. 8-6-19. Acc. #201708fr1182

L) View looking southwest of the east and north facing facades of Building #1. 8-6-19. Acc.#201908fr1176 DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 9 of 12 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 7760 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol *Recorded by: Neal Neuenschwander *Date: 8-6-19 X Continuation  Update

M) View looking northeast of the west and south facing facades of Building #2. 8-6-19. Acc. #201708fr1181

N) View looking southwest of the east and north facing facades of Building #2. 8-6-19. Acc.#201908fr1177 DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 10 of 12 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 7760 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol *Recorded by: Neal Neuenschwander *Date: 8-6-19 X Continuation  Update

O) View looking east, northeast of the west and south facing facades of Building #3. 8-6-19. Acc. #201708fr1198

P) View looking southeast of the partial north and west facing facades of Building #3. 8-6-19. Acc.#201908fr1199 DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# SKETCH MAP Trinomial Page 11 of 12 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 7760 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol *Drawn By: Neal Neuenschwander *Date 8-6-19

DPR 523K (1/95) *Required information State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# LOCATION MAP Trinomial Page 12 of 12 *Resource Name or #: 7760 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol *Map Name: Sebastopol, Calif. *Scale: 1:24,000 *Date of Map: 1954 (1980)

DPR 523J (1/95) *Required information