DOCSLIB.ORG

Town of Windsor Jaguar Way Extension Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Town of Windsor Jaguar Way Extension Project TOWN OF WINDSOR JAGUAR WAY EXTENSION PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST AND INITIAL STUDY MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PREPARED BY: METROPOLITAN PLANNING GROUP 499 HUMBOLDT STREET SANTA ROSA, CA 95404 MAY 2020 M-GROUP [Page Intentionally Left Blank] Town of Windsor Jaguar Way Extension Project TOWN OF WINDSOR JAGUAR WAY EXTENSION PROJECT CEQA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST AND INITIAL STUDY Project Title: Jaguar Way Extension Project Lead agency name and address: Town of Windsor 8400 Windsor Road Bldg. 100, Windsor, CA 95492 Contact person and phone number: Alejandro Perez, Senior Civil Engineer (707) 838-5318 Project Location: Jaguar Way between Starr Road on the west and Windsor Road on the east, Town of Windsor Sonoma County, CA (APNs: 066-180-060, 066-180-064, 164-030-052, 164-440-006, 164-440-005, and 066-180-GAP) Project sponsor’s name and address: Town of Windsor 9291 Old Redwood Highway, Windsor, CA 95492 Property Owners: Town of Windsor and Windsor Unified School District General Plan Designation and Zoning: N/A (Public Right of Way) Description of project: The Jaguar Way Extension Project (Project) consists of an approximately 0.5 mile-long roadway extending between Starr Road on the west and Windsor Road on the east, including an overcrossing of Starr Creek. Jaguar Way Extension would provide two vehicle travel lanes (one in each direction), multi- modal access for pedestrian and bicycles, and connectivity to existing and planned uses along Jaguar Way. Surrounding land uses and setting; The project site is situated north of Windsor High School and briefly describe the project’s south of Keiser Park. The western portion of the project site surroundings: bisects Starr Creek. The existing Starr Creek Park is located south of the proposed roadway, east of Starr Creek. Existing single-family residential homes are located north and south of the proposed roadway, adjacent to Starr Road towards the western limit of the project area, and north of the proposed roadway, just west of Windsor Drive. Downtown Windsor is approximately 0.25 miles to the northeast and Highway 101 is approximately 0.5 miles to the west. Other public agencies whose approval is California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), Regional required (e.g. permits, financial Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Sonoma Water (SW), approval, or participation agreements): Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Have California Native American tribes Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians, Middletown Rancheria, traditionally and culturally affiliated with Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria (FIGR), Kashia Band of the project area requested consultation Pomo Indians of Stewarts Point, Dry Creek Rancheria Band of pursuant to Public Resources Code Pomo Indians, Mishewal-Wappo Tribe of Alexander Valley, and section 21080.3.1? If so, has consultation Lytton Rancheria of California were notified on February 8, begun? 2018. Although other Tribes responded to the notice, only FIGR requested consultation, which was completed in 2018. i IS/MND Town of Windsor Jaguar Way Extension Project [PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] ii IS/MND Town of Windsor Jaguar Way Extension Project TOWN OF WINDSOR JAGUAR WAY EXTENSION PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE # 1. INTRODUCTION, BACKGROUND, AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................. 1 1.1. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE .............................................................................................................2 1.2. PROJECT BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................4 1.3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................................................6 2. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED .......................................................................... 21 3. DETERMINATION ..................................................................................................................................... 23 4. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ....................................................................................... 25 4.1. AESTHETICS .......................................................................................................................................................... 25 4.2. AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY RESOURCES ............................................................................................................ 29 4.3. AIR QUALITY ......................................................................................................................................................... 31 4.4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ....................................................................................................................................... 38 4.5. CULTURAL RESOURCES .......................................................................................................................................... 46 4.6. ENERGY ................................................................................................................................................................ 49 4.7. GEOLOGY AND SOILS ............................................................................................................................................ 52 4.8. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ............................................................................................................................... 57 4.9. HAZARDS/HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ........................................................................................................................ 59 4.10. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY ........................................................................................................................ 66 4.11. LAND USE AND PLANNING .................................................................................................................................... 71 4.12. MINERAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................................................................ 74 4.13. NOISE .................................................................................................................................................................. 75 4.14. POPULATION AND HOUSING .................................................................................................................................. 82 4.15. PUBLIC SERVICES .................................................................................................................................................. 84 4.16. RECREATION ......................................................................................................................................................... 86 4.17. TRANSPORTATION ................................................................................................................................................. 87 4.18. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................................................... 98 4.19. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS .......................................................................................................................... 101 4.20. WILDFIRE ........................................................................................................................................................... 105 4.21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE (CAL. PUB. RES. CODE §15065) ............................................................ 106 5. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 109 6. MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM ................................................................... 111 TABLE OF FIGURES FIGURE 1: REGIONAL LOCATION ................................................................................................................................. 11 FIGURE 2: PROJECT VICINITY ........................................................................................................................................ 13 FIGURE 3: GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ......................................................................................................................... 15 FIGURE 4: ZONING ........................................................................................................................................................ 17 FIGURE 5: AIRPORT LAND USE SAFETY ZONES .......................................................................................................... 19 iii IS/MND Town of Windsor Jaguar Way Extension Project LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1: AIR QUALITY SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS ................................................................................................ 32 TABLE 2: CONSTRUCTION RISK IMPACTS AT THE OFFSITE MEI .............................................................................. 35 TABLE 3: AIRPORT SAFETY ZONE LAND USE COMPATIBILITY STANDARDS ........................................................... 62 TABLE 4: SUMMARY OF COLLISION RATES AT THE STUDY INTERSECTIONS ......................................................... 91 TABLE 5: SUMMARY OF EXISTING AND PLANNED BICYCLE FACILITIES ................................................................. 92 TABLE 6: INTERSECTION
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Archival Study for the Fish Habitat Flows and Water Rights Project
    APPENDIX D Archival Study for the Fish Habitat Flows and Water Rights Project An Archival Study for the Fish Habitat Flows and Water Rights Project Mendocino and Sonoma Counties, California Eileen Barrow, M.A. June 6, 2016 An Archival Study for the Fish Habitat Flows and Water Rights Project Mendocino and Sonoma Counties, California Prepared by: _________________________________ Eileen Barrow, M.A. Tom Origer & Associates Post Office Box 1531 Rohnert Park, California 94927 (707) 584-8200 Prepared for: Sonoma County Water Agency 404 Aviation Santa Rosa, California 95407 June 6, 2016 ABSTRACT Tom Origer & Associates conducted an archival study for the Fish Habitat Flows and Water Rights Project, as requested by the Sonoma County Water Agency. This study was designed to meet requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. Per the findings of the National Marine Fisheries Service (2008), the Sonoma County Water Agency is seeking to improve Coho salmon and steelhead habitat in the Russian River and Dry Creek by modifying the minimum instream flow requirements specified by the State Water Resources Control Board's 1986 Decision 1610. The current study includes a ⅛ mile buffer around Lake Mendocino, Lake Sonoma, the Russian River from Coyote Valley Dam to the Pacific Ocean, and Dry Creek from Warm Springs Dam to the Russian River. The study included archival research at the Northwest Information Center, Sonoma State University (NWIC File No. 15-1481); archival research at the Museum of Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley; examination of the library and files of Tom Origer & Associates; and contact with the Native American community. Documentation pertaining to this study is on file at the offices of Tom Origer & Associates (File No.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian River Watershed Directory September 2012
    Russian River Watershed Directory September 2012 A guide to resources and services For management and stewardship of the Russian River Watershed © www.robertjanover.com. Russian River & Big Sulphur Creek at Cloverdale, CA. Photo By Robert Janover Production of this directory was made possible through funding from the US Army Corps of Engineers and the California Department of Conservation. In addition to this version of the directory, you can find updated versions online at www.sotoyomercd.org Russian River Watershed Directory version September 2012 - 1 - Preface The Sotoyome Resource Conservation District (RCD) has updated our Russian River Watershed directory to assist landowners, residents, professionals, educators, organizations and agencies interested in the many resources available for natural resource management and stewardship throughout the Russian River watershed. In 1997, The Sotoyome RCD compiled the first known resource directory of agencies and organization working in the Russian River Watershed. The directory was an example of an emerging Coordinated Resource Management and Planning (CRMP) effort to encourage community-based solutions for natural resource management. Since that Photo courtesy of Sonoma County Water Agency time the directory has gone through several updates with our most recent edition being released electronically and re-formatting for ease of use. For more information or to include your organization in the Directory, please contact the Sotoyome Resource Conservation District Sotoyome Resource Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORICAL CHANGES in CHANNEL ALIGNMENT Along Lower Laguna De Santa Rosa and Mark West Creek
    HISTORICAL CHANGES IN CHANNEL ALIGNMENT along Lower Laguna de Santa Rosa and Mark West Creek PREPARED FOR SONOMA COUNTY WATER AGENCY JUNE 2014 Prepared by: Sean Baumgarten1 Erin Beller1 Robin Grossinger1 Chuck Striplen1 Contributors: Hattie Brown2 Scott Dusterhoff1 Micha Salomon1 Design: Ruth Askevold1 1 San Francisco Estuary Institute 2 Laguna de Santa Rosa Foundation San Francisco Estuary Institute Publication #715 Suggested Citation: Baumgarten S, EE Beller, RM Grossinger, CS Striplen, H Brown, S Dusterhoff, M Salomon, RA Askevold. 2014. Historical Changes in Channel Alignment along Lower Laguna de Santa Rosa and Mark West Creek. SFEI Publication #715, San Francisco Estuary Institute, Richmond, CA. Report and GIS layers are available on SFEI’s website, at http://www.sfei.org/ MarkWestHE Permissions rights for images used in this publication have been specifically acquired for one-time use in this publication only. Further use or reproduction is prohibited without express written permission from the responsible source institution. For permissions and reproductions inquiries, please contact the responsible source institution directly. CONTENTS 1. Introduction .....................................................................................1 a. Environmental Setting..........................................................................2 b. Study Area ................................................................................................2 2. Methods ............................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Dry Creek Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians Tribal State Gaming
    United States Department of the Interior OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY Washington, DC 20240 DEC 1 5 2017 The Honorable Chris Wright Chairman, Dry Creek Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians P.O. Box 607 Geyserville, California 95441 Dear Chairman Wright: On October 5, 2017, our office received from the State of California (State) a copy of the proposed Tribal-State Compact (Compact) between the State of California and the Dry Creek Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians (Tribe). DECISION Under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) may approve or disapprove a proposed compact within 45 days of its submission. 25 U.S.C. § 2710 ( d)(8). If the Secretary does not approve or disapprove the proposed compact within 45 days, IGRA states that the compact is considered approved by the Secretary, "but only to the extent the Compact is consistent with the provisions of [IGRA]." 25 U.S.C. § 2710(d)(8)(C). We undertook a thorough review of the Compact and the additional materials submitted by the parties. While we have concerns with some provisions in the Compact, we have taken no action within the prescribed 45-day review period. As a result, the Compact is "considered to have been approved by the Secretary, but only to the extent [it] is consistent with the provisions of [IGRA]." 25 U.S.C. § 2710(d)(8)(C). We proceed in this "deemed approved" manner because the Compact contains provisions that appear to give the State broad authority over non-gaming activities, such as a hotel and on-reservation development and thus may exceed the lawful scope of State authority in gaming compacts under IGRA.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Stream Maintenance Program
    2018 Stream Maintenance Program Improving water quality in our streams while providing flood protection for our community This summer the Sonoma County Water Agency (Water Agency) will be working in streams and channels throughout Sonoma County to improve water quality and provide flood protection. As part of our comprehensive Stream Maintenance Program (SMP), we will be removing sediment and garbage and planting trees to create shady riparian canopies. These canopies help cool the water and shade out less desirable species of plants, which can catch debris and reduce the streams’ water-carrying capacity. If necessary, we will remove some non-canopy forming trees such as arroyo willows as well as certain dense shrubs such as non-native and invasive blackberries. Sediment removal activities include planting native trees, shrubs, and some aquatic plants according to a certain pattern to establish canopy while maintaining channel capacity. The Sonoma County Youth Ecology Corps (SCYEC), a workforce training and ecosystem education program aimed at educating youth and young adults in environmental stewardship and restoration, will be working with the SMP this summer. The SCYEC provides youth and young adults paychecks, valuable work experience, environmental education, and the opportunity to contribute to their community through ongoing outdoor experiences. Below is the list of streams the Water Agency will be maintaining this summer. For a more detailed list, map of locations, and information on stream maintenance, visit www.sonomacountywater.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Friends, Sonoma County Is Celebrating the Winter and Spring Rains Which Have Left Our Rivers and Creeks with Plenty of Clea
    This picture of Mark West creek was taken in April by our intern, Nick Bel. Dear Friends, Sonoma County is celebrating the winter and spring rains which have left our rivers and creeks with plenty of clear clean water going into summer. Many of CCWI’s water monitors have noted that local rivers and creeks have more water and are more beautiful than they have been in the past several years. This is a very promising start to the summer season, but we should not let our guard down just yet. Several years of drought have left us with a shortage of water in many reservoirs so we must still be conscious of how we use and protect this precious resource. CCWI has a new program Director! Art Hasson joined the Community Clean Water Institute in 2008 as an intern and volunteer water monitor. Art has a business degree from the State University of New York, which he has put to good use as our new program director. He has updated our water quality database engaged in field work, performed flow studies and bacterial analysis for the past two years. Art is focused on protecting our public health through the preservation of our waterways. CCWI would like to thank outgoing program director Terrance Fleming for his hard work and valuable contributions to protect water resources. We wish him the very best in his future endeavors. CCWI would like to thank our donors for their support in building our online database interactive database. It contains nine years of data that CCWI volunteer water monitors have collected on local creeks and streams in and around Sonoma County.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 72, No. 119/Thursday, June 21, 2007/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 119 / Thursday, June 21, 2007 / Notices 34275 Dated: May 21, 2007. California state law. Further to this associated funerary objects are 157 Sherry Hutt, agreement, human remains from CA– olivella beads, 15 Haliotis beads and Manager, National NAGPRA Program. MRN–27, CA–MRN–254, CA–SON–159, bead fragments, 6 bone awls, 3 bone [FR Doc. E7–11986 Filed 6–20–07; 8:45 am] CA–SON–293, CA–SON–455, and CA- pendants, 5 birdbone tubes, 5 pieces of BILLING CODE 4312–50–S SON–456 were repatriated to officials of worked bone, 7 pieces of red ochre, 10 Ya Ka Ama Indian Education and obsidian tools and flakes, 6 chert tools Development, Inc., a non–federally and flakes, 2 pieces of pumice, 2 pieces DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR recognized Indian group from of micaceous schist, and 2 other lithic Forestville, CA, who reburied the tools. Three items on the original National Park Service human remains in 1992. In 1997, during manifest of artifacts are considered NAGPRA inventory, additional human missing. Notice of Inventory Completion: remains were discovered in the museum Radiocarbon tests from the Reedland Anthropological Studies Center, collection for sites CA–SON–293, CA– Woods site yielded dates of 370 B.C. 190 Archaeological Collections Facility, SON–455, CA–SON–456, CA–MRN– and 30 B.C. 95. Analysis of the artifacts Sonoma State University, Rohnert 254, and CA–SON–159. In 1997 and found at the Reedland Woods site Park, CA 2006, human remains for site CA–MRN– indicate that the human remains were 27 that were on loan to various buried during the Upper Archaic period AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
    [Show full text]
  • MAJOR STREAMS in SONOMA COUNTY March 1, 2000
    MAJOR STREAMS IN SONOMA COUNTY March 1, 2000 Bill Cox District Fishery Biologist Sonoma / Marin Gualala River 234 North Fork Gualala River 34 Big Pepperwood Creek 34 Rockpile Creek 34 Buckeye Creek 34 Francini Creek 23 Soda Springs Creek 34 Little Creek North Fork Buckeye Creek Osser Creek 3 Roy Creek 3 Flatridge Creek 3 South Fork Gualala River 32 Marshall Creek 234 Sproul Creek 34 Wild Cattle Canyon Creek 34 McKenzie Creek 34 Wheatfield Fork Gualala River 3 Fuller Creek 234 Boyd Creek 3 Sullivan Creek 3 North Fork Fuller Creek 23 South Fork Fuller Creek 23 Haupt Creek 234 Tobacco Creek 3 Elk Creek House Creek 34 Soda Spring Creek Allen Creek Pepperwood Creek 34 Danfield Creek 34 Cow Creek Jim Creek 34 Grasshopper Creek Britain Creek 3 Cedar Creek 3 Wolf Creek 3 Tombs Creek 3 Sugar Loaf Creek 3 Deadman Gulch Cannon Gulch Chinese Gulch Phillips Gulch Miller Creek 3 Warren Creek Wildcat Creek Stockhoff Creek 3 Timber Cove Creek Kohlmer Gulch 3 Fort Ross Creek 234 Russian Gulch 234 East Branch Russian Gulch 234 Middle Branch Russian Gulch 234 West Branch Russian Gulch 34 Russian River 31 Jenner Creek 3 Willow Creek 134 Sheephouse Creek 13 Orrs Creek Freezeout Creek 23 Austin Creek 235 Kohute Gulch 23 Kidd Creek 23 East Austin Creek 235 Black Rock Creek 3 Gilliam Creek 23 Schoolhouse Creek 3 Thompson Creek 3 Gray Creek 3 Lawhead Creek Devils Creek 3 Conshea Creek 3 Tiny Creek Sulphur Creek 3 Ward Creek 13 Big Oat Creek 3 Blue Jay 3 Pole Mountain Creek 3 Bear Pen Creek 3 Red Slide Creek 23 Dutch Bill Creek 234 Lancel Creek 3 N.F.
    [Show full text]
  • MEMORANDUM DATE: August 31
    MEMORANDUM DATE: August 31, 2017 Project No.: 592-10-16-05 SENT VIA: EMAIL TO: Harish Bagha, Grant Manager State Water Board Division of Financial Assistance Kari Holzgang, Program Analyst State Water Board Division of Financial Assistance FROM: Millicent Cowley-Crawford, Russian River Watershed Association Jarod Thiele, Grant Contact, City of Ukiah REVIEWED BY: Elizabeth Drayer, PE, RCE #46872 SUBJECT: Task 4.3 Description of Approach to Addressing Water Quality The Russian River Watershed Association (RRWA) has prepared this memorandum to provide a description of the approach to address water quality requirements in the Russian River Storm Water Resource Plan (SWRP). The approach identifies activities generating or contributing to polluted runoff or that impair beneficial uses of storm water and dry weather runoff and outlines potential strategies to address these issues. In addition, the consistency of the SWRP with applicable water quality regulatory requirements is outlined. STORM WATER RESOURCE PLANNING AREA The Planning Area of the Russian River SWRP has been determined in the Task 3.2 Planning Area and Watershed Descriptions memorandum dated June 9, 2017. As a brief overview, for the purposes of the SWRP, the Russian River watershed includes three divisions with nine U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 10 watersheds, and 43 HUC 12 subwatersheds. With twenty major tributaries and covering an area of 950,360 acres, the Russian River runs a length of 110 miles and is susceptible to water quality threats both in its tributaries and mainstem. The Russian River Watershed Association complies with ADA requirements and will attempt to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities upon request.
    [Show full text]
  • NPDES Water Bodies
    Attachment A: Detailed list of receiving water bodies within the Marin/Sonoma Mosquito Control District boundaries under the jurisdiction of Regional Water Quality Control Boards One and Two This list of watercourses in the San Francisco Bay Area groups rivers, creeks, sloughs, etc. according to the bodies of water they flow into. Tributaries are listed under the watercourses they feed, sorted by the elevation of the confluence so that tributaries entering nearest the sea appear they first. Numbers in parentheses are Geographic Nantes Information System feature ids. Watercourses which feed into the Pacific Ocean in Sonoma County north of Bodega Head, listed from north to south:W The Gualala River and its tributaries • Gualala River (253221): o North Fork (229679) - flows from Mendocino County. o South Fork (235010): Big Pepperwood Creek (219227) - flows from Mendocino County. • Rockpile Creek (231751) - flows from Mendocino County. Buckeye Creek (220029): Little Creek (227239) North Fork Buckeye Crcck (229647): Osser Creek (230143) • Roy Creek (231987) • Soda Springs Creek (234853) Wheatfield Fork (237594): Fuller Creek (223983): • Sullivan Crcck (235693) Boyd Creek (219738) • North Fork Fuller Creek (229676) South Fork Fuller Creek (235005) Haupt Creek (225023) • Tobacco Creek (236406) Elk Creek (223108) • )`louse Creek (225688): Soda Spring Creek (234845) Allen Creek (218142) Peppeawood Creek (230514): • Danfield Creek (222007): • Cow Creek (221691) • Jim Creek (226237) • Grasshopper Creek (224470) Britain Creek (219851) • Cedar Creek (220760) • Wolf Creek (238086) • Tombs Crock (236448) • Marshall Creek (228139): • McKenzie Creek (228391) Northern Sonoma Coast Watercourses which feed into the Pacific Ocean in Sonoma County between the Gualala and Russian Rivers, numbered from north to south: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Assessment
    CHARLES M. SCHULZ SONOMA COUNTY AIRPORT BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT SONOMA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted to: Federal Aviation Administration Western-Pacific Region 15000 Aviation Blvd. Hawthorne, California 90250 Submitted by: Sonoma County Department of Transportation and Public Works 2300 County Center Drive, Suite B-100 Santa Rosa, California 95403 Prepared by: LSA Associates, Inc. 157 Park Place Point Richmond, California 94801 (510) 236-6810 LSA Project No. MHN530 March 24, 2006 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. CHARLES M. SCHULZ SONOMA COUNTY AIRPORT MARCH 2006 BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT SONOMA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT...........................................................1 1.2 SITE LOCATION AND PROJECT AREA..........................................................................1 1.3 NOMENCLATURE..............................................................................................................6 2.0 SPECIES ADDRESSED .................................................................................................................7 2.1 LISTED SPECIES ................................................................................................................7 2.2 OTHER SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES .............................................................................10 2.3 CRITICAL HABITAT STATUS........................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Stream Maintenance Program Improving Water Quality in Our Streams While Providing Flood Protection for Our Community
    2020 Stream Maintenance Program Improving water quality in our streams while providing flood protection for our community This summer the Sonoma County Water Agency (Sonoma Water) will be working in streams and PLANNED WORK LOCATIONS channels throughout Sonoma County to improve water quality and provide flood 2020 VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PROJECTS protection. As part of our comprehensive Zone 1A Zone 2A Stream Maintenance Program (SMP), we will be Coffey Creek Adobe Creek removing sediment and garbage and planting Corona Creek trees to create shady riparian canopies. These Coleman Creek canopies help cool the water and shade out less Colgan Creek Corona Creek Tributary desirable species of plants, which can catch Cook Creek East Fork McDowell Creek debris and reduce the streams’ water-carrying Copeland Creek East Washington Creek capacity. If necessary, we will remove some Crane Creek Jessie Lane Creek non-canopy forming trees such as arroyo Faught Creek Lichau Creek willows as well as certain dense shrubs such as Hinebaugh Creek Lynch Creek non-native and invasive blackberries. Sediment Laguna de Santa Rosa McDowell Creek removal activities include planting native trees, Moorland Creek Thompson Creek shrubs, and some aquatic plants according to a Paulin Creek Washington Creek certain pattern to establish canopy while Piner Creek maintaining channel capacity. Roseland Creek Zone 6A Russell Creek West Slough The Sonoma County Youth Ecology Corps Santa Rosa Creek (SCYEC), a workforce training and ecosystem education program aimed at educating youth Sierra Park Creek and young adults in environmental stewardship Spring Creek and restoration, will be working with the SMP Starr Creek Tributary this summer.
    [Show full text]