DOCSLIB.ORG

Mikkelin Luonto Ja Arvokkaat Luontokohteet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mikkelin Luonto Ja Arvokkaat Luontokohteet MIKKELIN LUONTO JA ARVOKKAAT LUONTOKOHTEET Mikkelin kaupungin julkaisuja 2009 ISBN 978-952-5691-10-8 ISSN 1459-1790 Tilaukset Mikkelin Seudun Ympäristöpalvelut Kiiskinmäenkatu 5-7, 50130 Mikkeli [email protected] tai (015) 194 4700 Painopaikka: Savilahden Kirjapaino Ky Kannen valokuva: Kurjenmiekka Hanhilammen luonnonsuojelualueella; Timo J. Lehtonen 2 SISÄLLYSLUETTELO ESIPUHE.............................................................................................................................5 1 JOHDANTO .................................................................................................................6 2 YLEISPIIRTEITÄ MIKKELIN LUONNOSTA................................................................6 2.1 Korkeussuhteet sekä maa- ja kallioperä......................................................................................................7 2.2 Vesistöjen syntyhistoriasta...........................................................................................................................7 2.3 Vesistöt .........................................................................................................................................................8 2.4 Veden laatu...................................................................................................................................................8 2.5 Suot.............................................................................................................................................................14 2.6 Harjut.........................................................................................................................................................15 2.7 Metsät.........................................................................................................................................................15 2.8 Kasvillisuuden ja eläimistön yleispiirteitä .................................................................................................15 3 IHMISEN VAIKUTUS KASVILLISUUTEEN JA ELÄIMISTÖÖN................................16 3.1 Ihmisasutuksen leviäminen ja pitäjän historia..........................................................................................16 3.2 Metsästys....................................................................................................................................................16 3.3 Kaskeaminen ja tervanpoltto.....................................................................................................................17 3.4 Nykyaikainen maanviljely..........................................................................................................................18 3.5 Metsätalous.................................................................................................................................................19 4 KASVILLISUUS .........................................................................................................20 4.1 Harvinaisten ja uhanalaisten kasvien esiintymät ......................................................................................20 4.2 Kasvierikoisuuksia.....................................................................................................................................22 5 ELÄIMISTÖ................................................................................................................22 5.1 Luontodirektiivin liitteen IVa) lajit ...........................................................................................................22 5.2 Linnut.........................................................................................................................................................24 5.2.1 EU:n lintudiretiivin lajien esiintyminen....................................................................................................24 5.3 Kalat...........................................................................................................................................................27 5.4 Selkärangattomat.......................................................................................................................................28 5.5 Muita Mikkelissä esiintyviä uhanalaisia ja harvinaisia lajeja...................................................................28 5.6 Muita kiinnostavia eläinlajeja ........................................................................................................................... 28 6 ARVOKKAAT LUONTOKOHTEET........................................................................... 29 6.1 Valtion maille perustetut luonnonsuojelualueet........................................................................................ 29 6.1.1 Asetuksella perustetut kohteet.................................................................................................................. 29 6.2 Lääninhallituksen tai Etelä-Savon ympäristökeskuksen päätöksellä suojellut kohteet ........................... 29 6.3 Luonnonsuojelulain 29 §:n perusteella annetut päätökset suojelluista luontotyypeistä........................... 42 6.4 Muut luonnonsuojelualueet ....................................................................................................................... 43 6.5 Luonnonsuojelulain 26 §:n perusteella rauhoitetut luonnonmuistomerkit .............................................. 44 6.6 Natura 2000 -kohteet.................................................................................................................................. 50 6.7 Valtakunnallisten suojeluohjelmien kohteet.............................................................................................. 56 6.7.1 Soidensuojeluohjelma.............................................................................................................................. 56 6.7.2 Rantojensuojeluohjelma .......................................................................................................................... 56 6.7.3 Vanhojen metsien suojeluohjelma............................................................................................................ 57 6.7.4 Lehtojen suojeluohjelma.......................................................................................................................... 58 6.7.5 Lintuvesien suojeluohjelman kohteet ....................................................................................................... 58 6.8 Vahvistettavana olevan maakuntakaavan suojelualuevaraukset.............................................................. 60 6.9 Maakuntakaavasta poisjätetyt seutukaavan suojelualuevaraukset.......................................................... 64 6.10 Kunnan osayleiskaavoihin sisältyvät kohteet............................................................................................ 66 7 ARVOKKAAT MAISEMAKOHTEET ......................................................................... 73 7.1 Arvokkaat maisema-alueet........................................................................................................................ 73 7.2 Arvokkaat perinnemaisemat ..................................................................................................................... 74 7.3 Valtakunnallisesti arvokkaat kallioalueet ................................................................................................. 77 7.4 Valtakunnallisesti arvokkaat moreenimuodostumat ................................................................................ 80 LÄHTEET:.............................................................................................................................................................. 82 LIITE 1 Lista Mikkelin kaupungissa havaituista kasvilajeista .............................................................................. 88 LIITE 2 Mikkelin perhoslajisto............................................................................................................................... 99 LIITE 3 Mikkelissä havaitut matelijat, sammakkoeläimet ja kalalajit................................................................ 111 LIITE 4 Mikkelissä havaitut lintulajit .................................................................................................................. 112 LIITE 5 Mikkelin nisäkäslajisto............................................................................................................................ 116 4 ESIPUHE Mikkelin kaupungin alue on 2000-luvulla tapahtuneiden kuntaliitosten seurauksena kasvanut suuresti. Nyt oli mielestäni oikea aika koota entisen Anttolan, Haukivuoren, Mikkelin maalaiskunnan ja Mikkelin kaupungin luontotieto yhteen julkaisuun. Julkaisussa on ensin kuvaus Mikkelin luonnon yleispiirteistä; kallio- ja maaperän yleispiirteistä, vesistöistä, metsien rakenteesta, kasvillisuudesta ja eläimistöstä. Sen jälkeen on kuvattu kaikki virallisesti perustetut suojelualueet ja esitelty eri suojeluoh- jelmiin kuuluvat kohteet. Julkaisuun on otettu mukaan myös mielenkiintoinen, pää- osin Wirilandereiden teksteihin perustuva historiallinen kuvaus ihmisen toiminnan vaikutuksista Mikkelin seudun kasvillisuuteen ja eläimistöön. Julkaisun on laatinut Joensuun yliopistossa biologiaa opiskeleva Julia Hämäläinen, jolle esitän lämpimät kiitokset mittavasta ja perusteellisesta työstä. Kuten julkaisun lähdeluettelostakin ilmenee, on työtä varten käyty läpi kymmenittäin erilaisia luon- toselvityksiä ja tietokantoja. Linnustotiedot perustuvat lintuharrastajien ylläpitämään Tiira-tietokantaan,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fauna Lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 Years Later: Changes and Additions
    ©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at Atalanta (August 2000) 31 (1/2):327-367< Würzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 "Fauna lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 years later: changes and additions. Part 5. Noctuidae (Insecto, Lepidoptera) by Vasily V. A n ik in , Sergey A. Sachkov , Va d im V. Z o lo t u h in & A n drey V. Sv ir id o v received 24.II.2000 Summary: 630 species of the Noctuidae are listed for the modern Volgo-Ural fauna. 2 species [Mesapamea hedeni Graeser and Amphidrina amurensis Staudinger ) are noted from Europe for the first time and one more— Nycteola siculana Fuchs —from Russia. 3 species ( Catocala optata Godart , Helicoverpa obsoleta Fabricius , Pseudohadena minuta Pungeler ) are deleted from the list. Supposedly they were either erroneously determinated or incorrect noted from the region under consideration since Eversmann 's work. 289 species are recorded from the re­ gion in addition to Eversmann 's list. This paper is the fifth in a series of publications1 dealing with the composition of the pres­ ent-day fauna of noctuid-moths in the Middle Volga and the south-western Cisurals. This re­ gion comprises the administrative divisions of the Astrakhan, Volgograd, Saratov, Samara, Uljanovsk, Orenburg, Uralsk and Atyraus (= Gurjev) Districts, together with Tataria and Bash­ kiria. As was accepted in the first part of this series, only material reliably labelled, and cover­ ing the last 20 years was used for this study. The main collections are those of the authors: V. A n i k i n (Saratov and Volgograd Districts), S.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods and Work Profile
    REVIEW OF THE KNOWN AND POTENTIAL BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS OF PHYTOPHTHORA AND THE LIKELY IMPACT ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICES JANUARY 2011 Simon Conyers Kate Somerwill Carmel Ramwell John Hughes Ruth Laybourn Naomi Jones Food and Environment Research Agency Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ 2 CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 13 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 15 2. Review of the potential impacts on species of higher trophic groups .................... 16 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.2 Methods ............................................................................................................................. 16 2.3 Results ............................................................................................................................... 17 2.4 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 44 3. Review of the potential impacts on ecosystem services .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Dispersal and Acclimatization of the Muskrat, Ondatra Zibethicus (L.), in Finland
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center Other Publications in Wildlife Management for 1960 The dispersal and acclimatization of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus (L.), in Finland Atso Artimo Suomen Riistanhoito-Saatio (Finnish Game Foundation) Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmother Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Artimo, Atso, "The dispersal and acclimatization of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus (L.), in Finland" (1960). Other Publications in Wildlife Management. 65. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmother/65 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Other Publications in Wildlife Management by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. R I 1ST A TIE T L .~1 U ( K A I S U J A ,>""'liSt I " e'e 'I >~ ~··21' \. • ; I .. '. .' . .,~., . <)/ ." , ., Thedi$perscdQnd.a~C:li"'dti~otlin. of ,the , , :n~skret, Ond~trq ~ib.t~i~',{(.h in. Firtland , 8y: ATSO ARTIMO . RllSTATIETEELLISljX JULKAISUJA PAPERS ON GAME RESEARCH 21 The dispersal and acclimatization of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus (l.), in Finland By ATSO ARTIMO Helsinki 1960 SUOMEN FIN LANDS R I 1ST A N HOI T O-S A A T I b ] AK TV ARDSSTI FTELSE Riistantutkimuslaitos Viltforskningsinstitutet Helsinki, Unionink. 45 B Helsingfors, Unionsg. 45 B FINNISH GAME FOUNDATION Game Research Institute Helsinki, Unionink. 45 B Helsinki 1960 . K. F. Puromichen Kirjapaino O.-Y. The dispersal and acclimatization of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus (L.), in Finland By Atso Artimo CONTENTS I.
    [Show full text]
  • Rejstřík Strana 357 –
    Bibliografie 1. ABSOLON, K. (1982): Pfiíspûvek k poznání arachnofau- kvádrov˘ch pískovcÛ âeské kfiídové pánve. – Rozpr. âs. ny lokalit Hrádníky u Chocnû, Peliny a Zámûlsk˘ bo- akad. vûd, fi. MPV, 94(6): 1–79, Praha. rek. – Práce a studie-pfiír., 13–14: 99–110, Pardubice. 25. BALTHASAR, V. (1956): Náprstník ãerven˘ v Orlick˘ch 2. AMBROÎ, J. (1935): Krkono‰e. – KniÏnice KâT, 9: horách. – Îiva, 4: 136, Praha. 1–176, Praha. 26. BÁRTA, F. (1988): Kvalitativní anal˘za ptaãího spoleãen- 3. ANDùRA, M., HANZAL, V. (1995): Atlas roz‰ífiení savcÛ stva navrhovaného chránûného území Zbytka v okrese v âeské republice. PfiedbûÏná verze. I. Sudokopytníci Náchod. – Sbor. vã. poboãky âs. spol. ornitol., 10: (Artiodactyla), zajíci (Lagomorpha). Národní muzeum, 57–61, Pardubice. 64 s., Praha. 27. BAUDY·, E. (1917–19): Botanick˘ prÛvodce okolím Ji- 4. ANDùRA, M., HANZAL, V. (1996): Atlas roz‰ífiení savcÛ ãína. – Krása na‰. dom., 11: 1–5, 31–34, 52–55, 72–73, v âeské republice. PfiedbûÏná verze. II. ·elmy (Carnivo- Praha. ra). Národní muzeum, 86 s., Praha. 28. BAUDY·, E. (1919 a): Botanické poznámky z údolí Ka- 5. ANDùRA, M., VOHRALÍK, V. (1982): Savci Broumovska. canov u Turnova. – âas. Nár. mus., sect. natur., 93: Lynx, 21 s., Praha, nepag. 128–130, Praha. 6. ANDR·, F. AKOL. (1972): Pfiíspûvek ke studiu v˘skytu 29. BAUDY·, E. (1919 b): Botanická procházka z Mlázovic chránûn˘ch druhÛ rostlin V˘chodoãeského kraje. – Prá- pfies Bûlohrad do Hofiic. – âas. Nár. mus., sect. na- ce a studie–pfiír., 4: 39–42, Pardubice. tur., 93: 128–130, Praha. 7. ANONYMUS (1922 a): O zfiízení národního parku ze skal 30.
    [Show full text]
  • Pieksämäki-Haukivuori-Mikkeli Mikkeli-Haukivuori
    Aikataulu voimassa 3.6.2018 alkaen PIEKSÄMÄKI-HAUKIVUORI-MIKKELI W W W W W W W W W koulp M-P M-P LS MKP 1) koulp 1) koulp 1) koulp 2) M-P M-PS Jäähalli 14:50 Pieksämäki 6:05 8:10 9:25 15:00 16:15 17:20 Vehmaskylän koulu | x | x | | Montola | I | x | | Montola th (kt 72) x x x x x x Kantala 6:25 x x x x x Pohjalahti th x x x x x x Haukivuori 6:40 9:00 10:00 15:05 15:40 16:50 17:55 Saksalanharju x x x x x x x Pitkäahontie th x x x x x x x Lietlahti th x x x x x x x Kalvitsa as th 6:55 9:10 10:10 14:10 x 15:40 I 17:05 18:05 Kalvitsa th x x x x 15:20 x 15:55 x x Hiirola x x x x x 15:55 x x x Rämälä th x x x x x x x x x Suonsaari 7:15 9:30 | x x x | 17:35 | Tupala x x | x x x | x | Mikkeli, matkakeskus 7:45 9:50 10:55 14:40 16:10 16:15 16:20 17:45 18:40 Liikennöi KM KM KM IL TT IL KM KM KM MIKKELI-HAUKIVUORI-PIEKSÄMÄKI W W W W W W W W koulp M-P koulp 1) koulp 2) MKP 1) M-S koulp 1) M-P M-PS Mikkeli, matkakeskus 6:15 6:20 7:45 13:20 14:10 15:10 16:25 19:05 Suonsaari | 6:30 x | x x x | Rämälä | | x 13:35 x | x | Rämälä th x x x x x x x x Hiirola x x 8:10 | 14:35 | 16:45 19:20 Kalvitsa as th 6:40 6:45 8:25 14:10 14:45 15:40 16:55 19:30 Kalvitsa th x x x x x Lietlahti th x x x x x Pitkäahontie th x x x x x Saksalanharju x x x x x Haukivuori koulukeskus | x | | | Haukivuori 7:00 8:50 15:00 17:15 19:45 Pohjalahti th x x x x x Kantala 7:10 x x x x Montola th (kt 72) x x x x x Montola x | | | | Vehmaskylän koulu x | | | | Pieksämäki 7:45 9:20 15:35 17:50 20:15 Jäähalli 7:55 T Liikennöi KM IL KM IL KM IL KM KM KM = Kantamatkat Oy TT = Tuplataxi Oy IL = Ihastjärven Linja Oy MKP = Maantaisin, keskiviikkoisin ja perjantaisin TuplaTaxin ja Ihastjärven Linjan vuorot ovat Mikkelin kaupungin sopimusliikennettä, ja näillä vuoroilla käytetään Mikkelin kaupungin Waltti-liikenteen taksataulukkoa.
    [Show full text]
  • (Insecta, Lepidoptera) Национального Парка «Анюйский» (Хабаровский Край) В
    Амурский зоологический журнал, 2020, т. XII, № 4 Amurian Zoological Journal, 2020, vol. XII, no. 4 www.azjournal.ru УДК 595.783 DOI: 10.33910/2686-9519-2020-12-4-490-512 http://zoobank.org/References/b28d159d-a1bd-4da9-838c-931ed5c583bb MACROHETEROCERA (INSECTA, LEPIDOPTERA) НАЦИОНАЛЬНОГО ПАРКА «АНЮЙСКИЙ» (ХАБАРОВСКИЙ КРАЙ) В. В. Дубатолов1, 2 1 ФГУ «Заповедное Приамурье», ул. Юбилейная, д. 8, Хабаровский край, 680502, пос. Бычиха, Россия 2 Институт систематики и экологии животных СО РАН, ул. Фрунзе, д. 11, 630091, Новосибирск, Россия Сведения об авторе Аннотация. Приводится список Macroheterocera (без Geometridae), Дубатолов Владимир Викторович отмеченных в Анюйском национальном парке, включающий 442 вида. E-mail: [email protected] Наиболее интересные находки: Rhodoneura vittula Guenée, 1858; Auzata SPIN-код: 6703-7948 superba (Butler, 1878); Oroplema plagifera (Butler, 1881); Mimopydna pallida Scopus Author ID: 14035403600 (Butler, 1877); Epinotodonta fumosa Matsumura, 1920; Moma tsushimana ResearcherID: N-1168-2018 Sugi, 1982; Chilodes pacifica Sugi, 1982; Doerriesa striata Staudinger, 1900; Euromoia subpulchra (Alpheraky, 1897) и Xestia kurentzovi (Kononenko, 1984). Среди них впервые для Приамурья приводятся Rhodoneura vittula Guen. (Thyrididae), Euromoia subpulchra Alph. и Xestia kurentzovi Kononenko (Noctuidae). Права: © Автор (2020). Опубликова- но Российским государственным Ключевые слова: Macroheterocera, Nolidae, Limacodidae, Cossidae, педагогическим университетом им. Thyrididae, Thyatiridae, Drepanidae, Uraniidae, Lasiocampidae,
    [Show full text]
  • Zoogeography of the Holarctic Species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): Importance of the Bering Ian Refuge
    © Entomologica Fennica. 8.XI.l991 Zoogeography of the Holarctic species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): importance of the Bering ian refuge Kauri Mikkola, J, D. Lafontaine & V. S. Kononenko Mikkola, K., Lafontaine, J.D. & Kononenko, V. S. 1991 : Zoogeography of the Holarctic species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): importance of the Beringian refuge. - En to mol. Fennica 2: 157- 173. As a result of published and unpublished revisionary work, literature compi­ lation and expeditions to the Beringian area, 98 species of the Noctuidae are listed as Holarctic and grouped according to their taxonomic and distributional history. Of the 44 species considered to be "naturall y" Holarctic before this study, 27 (61 %) are confirmed as Holarctic; 16 species are added on account of range extensions and 29 because of changes in their taxonomic status; 17 taxa are deleted from the Holarctic list. This brings the total of the group to 72 species. Thirteen species are considered to be introduced by man from Europe, a further eight to have been transported by man in the subtropical areas, and five migrant species, three of them of Neotropical origin, may have been assisted by man. The m~jority of the "naturally" Holarctic species are associated with tundra habitats. The species of dry tundra are frequently endemic to Beringia. In the taiga zone, most Holarctic connections consist of Palaearctic/ Nearctic species pairs. The proportion ofHolarctic species decreases from 100 % in the High Arctic to between 40 and 75 % in Beringia and the northern taiga zone, and from between 10 and 20 % in Newfoundland and Finland to between 2 and 4 % in southern Ontario, Central Europe, Spain and Primorye.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of a Raised Bog and Adjacent Forest in Lithuania
    Eur. J. Entomol. 101: 63–67, 2004 ISSN 1210-5759 Lepidoptera of a raised bog and adjacent forest in Lithuania DALIUS DAPKUS Department of Zoology, Vilnius Pedagogical University, Studentų 39, LT–2004 Vilnius, Lithuania; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Lepidoptera, tyrphobiontic and tyrphophilous species, communities, raised bog, wet forest, Lithuania Abstract. Studies on nocturnal Lepidoptera were carried out on the Laukėnai raised bog and the adjacent wet forest in 2001. Species composition and abundance were evaluated and compared. The species richness was much higher in the forest than at the bog. The core of each lepidopteran community was composed of 22 species with an abundance of higher than 1.0% of the total catch. Tyrpho- philous Hypenodes humidalis (22.0% of all individuals) and Nola aerugula (13.0%) were the dominant species in the raised bog community, while tyrphoneutral Pelosia muscerda (13.6%) and Eilema griseola (8.3%) were the most abundant species at the forest site. Five tyrphobiotic and nine tyrphophilous species made up 43.4% of the total catch on the bog, and three and seven species, respectively, at the forest site, where they made up 9.2% of all individuals. 59% of lepidopteran species recorded on the bog and 36% at the forest site were represented by less than five individuals. The species compositions of these communities showed a weak similarity. Habitat preferences of the tyrphobiontic and tyrphophilous species and dispersal of some of the species between the habi- tats are discussed. INTRODUCTION (1996). Ecological terminology is that of Mikkola & Spitzer (1983), Spitzer & Jaroš (1993), Spitzer (1994): tyrphobiontic The insect fauna of isolated raised bogs in Europe is species are species that are strongly associated with peat bogs, unique in having a considerable portion of relict boreal while tyrphophilous taxa are more abundant on bogs than in and subarctic species (Mikkola & Spitzer, 1983; Spitzer adjacent habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution to the Knowledge of the Fauna of Bombyces, Sphinges And
    driemaandelijks tijdschrift van de VLAAMSE VERENIGING VOOR ENTOMOLOGIE Afgiftekantoor 2170 Merksem 1 ISSN 0771-5277 Periode: oktober – november – december 2002 Erkenningsnr. P209674 Redactie: Dr. J–P. Borie (Compiègne, France), Dr. L. De Bruyn (Antwerpen), T. C. Garrevoet (Antwerpen), B. Goater (Chandlers Ford, England), Dr. K. Maes (Gent), Dr. K. Martens (Brussel), H. van Oorschot (Amsterdam), D. van der Poorten (Antwerpen), W. O. De Prins (Antwerpen). Redactie-adres: W. O. De Prins, Nieuwe Donk 50, B-2100 Antwerpen (Belgium). e-mail: [email protected]. Jaargang 30, nummer 4 1 december 2002 Contribution to the knowledge of the fauna of Bombyces, Sphinges and Noctuidae of the Southern Ural Mountains, with description of a new Dichagyris (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae, Endromidae, Saturniidae, Sphingidae, Notodontidae, Noctuidae, Pantheidae, Lymantriidae, Nolidae, Arctiidae) Kari Nupponen & Michael Fibiger [In co-operation with Vladimir Olschwang, Timo Nupponen, Jari Junnilainen, Matti Ahola and Jari- Pekka Kaitila] Abstract. The list, comprising 624 species in the families Lasiocampidae, Endromidae, Saturniidae, Sphingidae, Notodontidae, Noctuidae, Pantheidae, Lymantriidae, Nolidae and Arctiidae from the Southern Ural Mountains is presented. The material was collected during 1996–2001 in 10 different expeditions. Dichagyris lux Fibiger & K. Nupponen sp. n. is described. 17 species are reported for the first time from Europe: Clostera albosigma (Fitch, 1855), Xylomoia retinax Mikkola, 1998, Ecbolemia misella (Püngeler, 1907), Pseudohadena stenoptera Boursin, 1970, Hadula nupponenorum Hacker & Fibiger, 2002, Saragossa uralica Hacker & Fibiger, 2002, Conisania arida (Lederer, 1855), Polia malchani (Draudt, 1934), Polia vespertilio (Draudt, 1934), Polia altaica (Lederer, 1853), Mythimna opaca (Staudinger, 1899), Chersotis stridula (Hampson, 1903), Xestia wockei (Möschler, 1862), Euxoa dsheiron Brandt, 1938, Agrotis murinoides Poole, 1989, Agrotis sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Tenth Forum Herbulot 2018. Integrative Taxonomy, a Multidisciplinary Approach to Answer Compli- Cated Taxonomic Questions
    SPIXIANA 42 2 291-320 München, Dezember 2019 ISSN 0341-8391 Proceedings of the tenth FORUM HERBULOT 2018. Integrative taxonomy, a multidisciplinary approach to answer compli- cated taxonomic questions (Stuttgart, Germany, 11-16 June 2018) Axel Hausmann & Hossein Rajaei (eds) Hausmann, A. & Rajaei, H. (eds) 2019. Proceedings of the tenth FORUM HERBULOT 2018. Integrative taxonomy, a multidisciplinary approach to answer complicated taxonomic questions (Stuttgart, Germany, 11-16 June 2018). Spixiana 42 (2): 291- 320. The tenth International Congress of FORUM HERBULOT on “Integrative taxonomy, a multidisciplinary approach to answer complicated taxonomic questions” took place in the Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart (SMNS), from 11.- 16.06.2018, with 77 participants and 52 scientific presentations. The proceedings provide short information on the meeting and the abstracts of the oral presenta- tions. Axel Hausmann (corresponding author), SNSB – ZSM, Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247 Munich, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Short report and results Axel Hausmann & Hossein Rajaei Hausmann, A. & Rajaei, H. 2019. Short report and results. Pp. 291-292 in: Hausmann, A. & Rajaei, H. (eds). Proceedings of the tenth FORUM HERBULOT 2018. Integrative taxonomy, a multidisciplinary approach to answer complicated taxonomic questions (Stuttgart, Germany, 11-16 June 2018). Spixiana 42 (2). Axel Hausmann (corresponding author), SNSB – ZSM, Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247 Mu- nich, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] The meeting was organized by an organization The conference started with a lecture on the ground- team of the ‘Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde breaking effects of “Willi Hennig and the synthesis of Stuttgart’ (SMNS).
    [Show full text]
  • Check List of Noctuid Moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae And
    Бiологiчний вiсник МДПУ імені Богдана Хмельницького 6 (2), стор. 87–97, 2016 Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University, 6 (2), pp. 87–97, 2016 ARTICLE UDC 595.786 CHECK LIST OF NOCTUID MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE AND EREBIDAE EXCLUDING LYMANTRIINAE AND ARCTIINAE) FROM THE SAUR MOUNTAINS (EAST KAZAKHSTAN AND NORTH-EAST CHINA) A.V. Volynkin1, 2, S.V. Titov3, M. Černila4 1 Altai State University, South Siberian Botanical Garden, Lenina pr. 61, Barnaul, 656049, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Tomsk State University, Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecology, Lenina pr. 36, 634050, Tomsk, Russia 3 The Research Centre for Environmental ‘Monitoring’, S. Toraighyrov Pavlodar State University, Lomova str. 64, KZ-140008, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan. E-mail: [email protected] 4 The Slovenian Museum of Natural History, Prešernova 20, SI-1001, Ljubljana, Slovenia. E-mail: [email protected] The paper contains data on the fauna of the Lepidoptera families Erebidae (excluding subfamilies Lymantriinae and Arctiinae) and Noctuidae of the Saur Mountains (East Kazakhstan). The check list includes 216 species. The map of collecting localities is presented. Key words: Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Erebidae, Asia, Kazakhstan, Saur, fauna. INTRODUCTION The fauna of noctuoid moths (the families Erebidae and Noctuidae) of Kazakhstan is still poorly studied. Only the fauna of West Kazakhstan has been studied satisfactorily (Gorbunov 2011). On the faunas of other parts of the country, only fragmentary data are published (Lederer, 1853; 1855; Aibasov & Zhdanko 1982; Hacker & Peks 1990; Lehmann et al. 1998; Benedek & Bálint 2009; 2013; Korb 2013). In contrast to the West Kazakhstan, the fauna of noctuid moths of East Kazakhstan was studied inadequately.
    [Show full text]
  • Baptria 2011 Nro 2
    Vol. 36 2011, nro 2 Suomen Perhostutkijain Seura ry Lepidopterologiska Sällskapet i Finland rf 33 Baptria 2/2011 ISSN 0355-4791 Suomen Perhostutkijain Seura ry Lepidopterologiska Sällskapet i Finland rf TOIMISTO Suomen Perhostutkijain Seura ry:n toimisto avoinna tiistaisin klo 15.30–20.00 Huom. loka–helmikuussa avoinna vain parittomina viikkoina. • Osoite/Address: Suomen Perhostutkijain Seura ry, Lämmittäjänkatu 2 A, FI–00810 Helsinki • e-mail: [email protected], internet: http://www.perhostutkijainseura.fi Pankkiyhteys — Bankförbindelse: Sampo 800019-268583 Toiminnanjohtaja — Verksamhetsledare IBAN: FI0680001900268583, BIC-koodi PSPBFIHH Jari Kaitila, Kannuskuja 8 D 37, 01200 Vantaa, puh. 050 586 8531, HALLITUS — STYRELSE e-mail: [email protected] Puheenjohtaja — Ordförande Taloudenhoitaja Antti Aalto, c/o Anna Aalto, Anttilantie 10, Lassi Jalonen, Isonmastontie 2 as 1, 05840 Hyvinkää. Puh. (019) 338 231 kesäas., 00980 Helsinki. Puh. 040 557 3000, e-mail: [email protected] Kevätkesällä lentävä Minucia lunaris e-mail: [email protected] -yökkönen löytyi Suomelle uutena Varapuheenjohtaja TOIMIKUNNAT — UTSKOTT lajina Hangosta toukokuussa 2010. Reima Leinonen, Rauhalantie 14 D 12, Eettinen toimikunta: Kuva: Timo Lehto, Bulgaria. 87830 Nakertaja. Puh. 040 529 6896, e-mail: [email protected] Vesa Lepistö (pj), Jyrki Lehto, Markus Lindberg, Karl-Erik Lundsten Muut hallituksen jäsenet: Suojelutoimikunta: Baptria 2/2011 Mari Kekkonen, Peräniityntie 14 as 2, 05820 Hyvinkää Erkki Laasonen (pj), Petri Hirvonen (siht.), Puh. 040 769 5339, e-mail: [email protected] Vol. 36 Jari Kaitila, Hannu Koski, Jaakko Kullberg, Jaakko Kullberg, Luonnontieteellinen Keskusmuseo, Reima Leinonen, Kari Nupponen, Panu Välimäki Hyönteisosasto 00014 Helsinki. Puh. 050 328 8886, Julkaisija — Utgivare Havainto- ja tiedonantotoimikunta: Suomen Perhostutkijain Seura ry e-mail: [email protected] Olavi Blomster, Sami Haapala, Lassi Jalonen, Lepidopterologiska Sällskapet i Finland rf Kimmo Silvonen, Pronssitie 28, 02750 Espoo.
    [Show full text]