DOCSLIB.ORG

The Justification of Terrorism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Justification of Terrorism View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives The Justification of Terrorism Morten Alexander Mossin Master's thesis in History Department of Archaeology, Conservation, and History (IAKH) University of Oslo Spring 2014 i Abstract i Abstract In this dissertation I have taken use of comparative research in order to compare three different terrorist organisations, and their justification of terrorism. The groups subjected to study in this paper are Rote Armee Fraktion, Al-Qaeda, and Anders Behring Breivik. The idea of using justification to legitimate violent attacks is a shared trait in most terrorist groups. The concept of justification is explained, and each group is examined to determine how they justify their violence. This analysis reveals that justification, even spanning cultural borders and ethnicities, is comparable and recognizable. The ideological basis for justification is conformable. Reflections made in the process include the importance for more social scientific research on the subject of justification, as well as the daunting realisation that terrorism will most likely never be overcome. ii Preface I have Finally completed the biggest project of my life. The journey was tough, but oh so rewarding. I would never have dreamed of finding the justification aspect of terrorism so interesting and gratifying. I have learnt a great deal, and grown in the presence of great minds, both around me and materialised in the books I've read. The ordeal has been tiresome, however I've always found comfort in the attentive and caring compassion of those close to me. First of all I want to thank my thesis counsellor – Professor Øystein Sørensen. For his guidance, words of wisdom, and expert opinion on my thesis. I would like to thank my family, for being so understanding and supporting in my academic pursuit. The staff at UiO have been exemplary, always there if (when) I needed them. Nik Brandal, Ragnar Holst Larsen and Helena Neumann especially, thank you. I would also like to thank my fellow students, both in Oslo and at Cambridge. Professor Paul Russell at Cambridge University for his commitment. And a special thanks to Aleksander Kristensen for his second opinion and invaluable feedback on my final draft. My two-year journey has come to an end, may the next one be as inspirational as the one I have had. Morten Alexander Mossin Cambridge, 14th of May, 2014 Preface iii Table of Contents iv Table of Contents Abstract.................................................................................................................................................i Preface.................................................................................................................................................ii Table of Contents................................................................................................................................iv List of Tables.......................................................................................................................................vi 1. Introduction......................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Starting Point.............................................................................................................................1 1.1.1 Politically motivated terrorism..........................................................................................2 1.1.2 Religious extremist terrorism............................................................................................2 1.1.3 Nationalistic terrorism.......................................................................................................2 1.2 Current theory...........................................................................................................................5 1.3 Main Theses...............................................................................................................................7 1.4 Restriction of the project...........................................................................................................8 1.5 Sources.......................................................................................................................................9 2. New terrorism and its significance.................................................................................................10 2.1 Four wave theory.....................................................................................................................10 2.2 Developing different approaches to terrorism........................................................................12 2.3 Challenges to a comparative approach..................................................................................16 2.4 New Terrorism.........................................................................................................................17 2.5 Historical approach..................................................................................................................19 3. Ideological Justifications.................................................................................................................21 3.1 The power of ideological justification.....................................................................................21 3.2 Political violence......................................................................................................................22 3.3 Religious and nationalistic justification...................................................................................23 4. Anders Behring Breivik...................................................................................................................26 4.1 Background..............................................................................................................................26 4.2 Ideological justification and methodology..............................................................................27 4.3 Impact and restrictions............................................................................................................38 5. Al-Qaeda.........................................................................................................................................40 5.1 Background..............................................................................................................................40 5.2 Ideological justification and methodology..............................................................................41 5.3 Impact and restrictions............................................................................................................50 6. Rote Armee Fraktion......................................................................................................................54 6.1 Background..............................................................................................................................54 Table of Contents v 6.2 Ideological justification and methodology..............................................................................55 6.3 Impact and restrictions............................................................................................................63 7. Comparative method......................................................................................................................66 7.1 Root causes and connections..................................................................................................66 7.2 Culture and Religion................................................................................................................73 7.3 The need for identity and propagandic rhetoric....................................................................75 7.4 Guerilla warfare.......................................................................................................................76 8. Conclusion......................................................................................................................................78 Bibliography.......................................................................................................................................81 List of Tables vi List of Tables Figure X - David Rapoport, Four wave theory..............................11 Introduction 1 1. Introduction 1.1 Starting Point “Allahu akbar. Allahu akbar.”1. Those were the last words ever heard by several passengers trying to break into the cockpit of Flight 93, September 11th 2001. Allahu akbar is Arabic, and best translated as “God is the greatest”, but how could these Muslim terrorists justify and legitimize their actions in the name of God? There had been several terrorist attacks on Western society prior to this one, although previous operations could not compare to this latest one in forms of planning and the enormous loss of life. The Bush administration called for a ‘Global War on Terrorism’2, and described the terrorist attack as cowardly. Western society would experience several more terrorist attacks across several countries in the years that followed.3 And all seemed to culminate in the most recent one, the dreadful attack on Arbeidernes ungdomsfylking’s (AUF) summer camp at Utøya and the bombing of Regjeringskvartalet by Norwegian right-wing extremist Anders Behring Breivik on the 22nd of July, 2011. This project will try
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Survey of Terrorist Groups and Their Means of Financing
    SURVEY OF TERRORIST GROUPS AND THEIR MEANS OF FINANCING HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON TERRORISM AND ILLICIT FINANCE OF THE COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION SEPTEMBER 7, 2018 Printed for the use of the Committee on Financial Services Serial No. 115–116 ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 31–576 PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 VerDate Mar 15 2010 14:03 Dec 06, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 G:\GPO PRINTING\DOCS\115TH HEARINGS - 2ND SESSION 2018\2018-09-07 TIF TERRO mcarroll on FSR431 with DISTILLER HOUSE COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES JEB HENSARLING, Texas, Chairman PATRICK T. MCHENRY, North Carolina, MAXINE WATERS, California, Ranking Vice Chairman Member PETER T. KING, New York CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York EDWARD R. ROYCE, California NYDIA M. VELA´ ZQUEZ, New York FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma BRAD SHERMAN, California STEVAN PEARCE, New Mexico GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York BILL POSEY, Florida MICHAEL E. CAPUANO, Massachusetts BLAINE LUETKEMEYER, Missouri WM. LACY CLAY, Missouri BILL HUIZENGA, Michigan STEPHEN F. LYNCH, Massachusetts SEAN P. DUFFY, Wisconsin DAVID SCOTT, Georgia STEVE STIVERS, Ohio AL GREEN, Texas RANDY HULTGREN, Illinois EMANUEL CLEAVER, Missouri DENNIS A. ROSS, Florida GWEN MOORE, Wisconsin ROBERT PITTENGER, North Carolina KEITH ELLISON, Minnesota ANN WAGNER, Missouri ED PERLMUTTER, Colorado ANDY BARR, Kentucky JAMES A. HIMES, Connecticut KEITH J. ROTHFUS, Pennsylvania BILL FOSTER, Illinois LUKE MESSER, Indiana DANIEL T. KILDEE, Michigan SCOTT TIPTON, Colorado JOHN K. DELANEY, Maryland ROGER WILLIAMS, Texas KYRSTEN SINEMA, Arizona BRUCE POLIQUIN, Maine JOYCE BEATTY, Ohio MIA LOVE, Utah DENNY HECK, Washington FRENCH HILL, Arkansas JUAN VARGAS, California TOM EMMER, Minnesota JOSH GOTTHEIMER, New Jersey LEE M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Christchurch Attack Report: Key Takeaways on Tarrant’S Radicalization and Attack Planning
    The Christchurch Attack Report: Key Takeaways on Tarrant’s Radicalization and Attack Planning Yannick Veilleux-Lepage, Chelsea Daymon and Amarnath Amarasingam i The Christchurch Attack Report: Key Takeaways on Tarrant’s Radicalization and Attack Planning Yannick Veilleux-Lepage, Chelsea Daymon and Amarnath Amarasingam ICCT Perspective December 2020 ii About ICCT The International Centre for Counter-Terrorism – The Hague (ICCT) is an independent think and do tank providing multidisciplinary policy advice and practical, solution- oriented implementation support on prevention and the rule of law, two vital pillars of effective counterterrorism. ICCT’s work focuses on themes at the intersection of countering violent extremism and criminal justice sector responses, as well as human rights-related aspects of counterterrorism. The major project areas concern countering violent extremism, rule of law, foreign fighters, country and regional analysis, rehabilitation, civil society engagement and victims’ voices. Functioning as a nucleus within the international counter-terrorism network, ICCT connects experts, policymakers, civil society actors and practitioners from different fields by providing a platform for productive collaboration, practical analysis, and exchange of experiences and expertise, with the ultimate aim of identifying innovative and comprehensive approaches to preventing and countering terrorism. Licensing and Distribution ICCT publications are published in open access format and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Threat Assessment and Management Postdicting Violence with Sovereign Citizen Actors: an Exploratory Test of the TRAP-18 Darin J
    Journal of Threat Assessment and Management Postdicting Violence With Sovereign Citizen Actors: An Exploratory Test of the TRAP-18 Darin J. Challacombe and Paul A. Lucas Online First Publication, October 1, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/tam0000105 CITATION Challacombe, D. J., & Lucas, P. A. (2018, October 1). Postdicting Violence With Sovereign Citizen Actors: An Exploratory Test of the TRAP-18. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/tam0000105 Journal of Threat Assessment and Management © 2018 American Psychological Association 2018, Vol. 1, No. 999, 000 2169-4842/18/$12.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/tam0000105 Postdicting Violence With Sovereign Citizen Actors: An Exploratory Test of the TRAP-18 Darin J. Challacombe Paul A. Lucas Fort Hays State University Appalachian State University The sovereign citizen movement is one of the largest antigovernment nationalism or domestic terrorist collectives in the United States. In the last decade, over a dozen public officials were injured or killed by individuals adhering to sovereign citizen ideology. The Terrorist Radicalization Assessment Protocol (TRAP-18; Meloy & Gill, 2016; Meloy, Habermeyer, & Guldimann, 2015) is a collection of 18 behavior-based warning signs for terror incidents which has been used to assess primarily international terrorism samples. In this study, the researchers applied the TRAP-18 to both violent and nonviolent incidents involving sovereign citizen members. Using chi-square tests for independence and a logistic regression analysis, the researchers found support for the TRAP-18. The sum of the TRAP-18 scores was able to postdict violent outcomes within the events included within the study.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Intimacy in an Age of Terrorism
    October 2011 – vol 27 – no 5 A darker shade of pale: Cultural every two months print ISSN 0268-540X online ISSN 1467-8322 intimacy in an age of terrorism available online at www.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/anth anthropologyat Guest Editorial by Thomas Hylland Eriksen today Aleksandar Bošković 1 NARRATIVE Oslo, 5 August 2011: It was a grim and rainy day as I made my Ratko Mladić: Relativism, myth and Alberto Corsín Jiménez and way to the harbour to catch the local ferry to Nesodden, a com- reality munity which had lost two of its brightest stars – Bano Rashid, Adolfo Estalella 19 18, and Diderik Aamodt Olsen, 19 – in the terrorist attack of Julie McBrien 3 #spanishrevolution 22 July, in which right-wing extremist Anders Behring Breivik Leaving for work, leaving in fear Lucia Volk 24 detonated a bomb in Oslo, killing eight people, and shot dead Michał Murawski 5 R.I.P. Paul the Octopus 69 more at a Young Labour (AUF) summer camp on the small Inappropriate object: Warsaw and the island of Utøya. On this Friday alone, more than 30 memorial COMMENT Stalin-era Palace of Culture after the services for Utøya victims were taking place across the country, and I had been asked to speak at Diderik’s service. I had met Smolensk disaster Janet Marstine, Elizabeth Greenspan, Michael Pickering, Paul H. Williams him once, this spring, when I gave a talk on nationalism and Stefan Leins 11 minorities to AUF members, and I remembered his sensible and Chip Colwell-Chanthaphonh 28 Pricing the revolution: Financial analysts and critical contributions to the subsequent discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • DIY Sovereignty and the Popular Right in Australia
    DIY Sovereignty and the Popular Right in Australia Judy Lattas Macquarie University [email protected] Abstract The concern of this paper is with the form that ‘right wing’ anti-government protest has taken in Australia in recent years. One tactic that is proving popular amongst those who have suffered setbacks in their hold on property, or in their small business ventures, is to declare their secession from Australia, and to establish an alternative jurisdiction and alternative citizenship. The author describes some of these projects, and links the serious political pursuit of this secessionist move to a movement in the USA called Sovereign Citizenship, which is itself linked to recent acts of anti-government sabotage called ‘paper terrorism’. I want to take up the conference theme of ‘Mobile Boundaries/Rigid Worlds’ in relation to the recent popularity in Australia of creating new countries - on a small scale, of course - in ‘do it yourself’ (DIY) projects involving a declaration of sovereignty and autonomy. Sometimes it is an experiment in citizenship or just for fun, but it is often done in protest. What I have in mind are those people, for example, who have declared their legal secession from Australia and formed their own principalities, like His Royal Highness Prince Leonard of the Hutt River Province Principality in Western Australia. While the story of Prince Leonard is legendary, others who are more contemporary are not well known. Commentators call these people micronationalists, which is a term that was coined in the 1990s to describe the activity that was pioneered by Prince Leonard of Hutt.
    [Show full text]
  • Oslo Tingrett - TOSLO-2011-188627-24 - RG-2012-1153
    Utskrift fra Lovdata - 17.01.2018 09:02 Oslo tingrett - TOSLO-2011-188627-24 - RG-2012-1153 Instans Oslo tingrett - Dom. Dato 2012-08-24 Publisert TOSLO-2011-188627-24 - RG-2012-1153 Stikkord (22. juli-saken / 22. juli-dommen) Strafferett. Terror. Drap. Sprengning. Tilregnelighet. Forvaring. Straffeloven § 39c, § 44, straffeloven § 147a første ledd bokstav a og b, jf. straffeloven § 148 første ledd 1. straffalternativ og § 233 første og annet ledd, jf. § 49. Sammendrag En 32 år gammel mann ble for to terrorhandlinger der blant annet 77 personer ble drept, dømt til 21 års forvaring med en minstetid på 10 år. Tiltalte drepte 8 og skadet 9 personer alvorlig da han sprengte en bombe i Regjeringskvartalet i Oslo. Eksplosjonen forårsaket også omfattende materielle ødeleggelser. Samme dag drepte gjerningsmannen 69 personer på Utøya, flertallet av disse var deltakere på AUFs sommerleir. I tillegg ble 33 ungdommer skadet. Foruten de fysiske skadene ble et stort antall personer påført psykiske lidelser. Tiltalte ble av retten funnet å være tilregnelig, dvs. ikke psykotisk, på gjerningstidspunktet. Retten har en omfattende og grundig vurdering av om vilkårene for tilregnelighet er oppfylt. Han kunne dermed idømmes straff. Saksgang Oslo tingrett TOSLO-2011-188627-24 (11-188627MED-OTIR/05). Rettskraftig. Parter Den offentlige påtalemyndighet (statsadvokat Svein Holden og statsadvokat Inga Bejer Engh) mot A (advokat Geir Lippestad, advokat Vibeke Hein Bæra, advokat Tord Eskild Kvinge Jordet og advokatfullmektig Odd Ivar Aursnes Grøn). Forfatter Rettens leder tingrettsdommer Wenche Elizabeth Arntzen, fagdommer tingrettsdommer Arne Lyng. Meddommere: Ernst Henning Eielsen, Diana Patricia Fynbo, Anne Elisabeth Wisløff. Sist oppdatert 2018-01-17 TOSLO-2011-188627-24 - RG-2012-1153 Side 1 Utskrift fra Lovdata - 17.01.2018 09:02 Side 3 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Terror in Europe? the Bible in Anders Behring Breivik's Manifesto
    J Bible Recept 2017; 4(1): 147–169 Hannah Strømmen* Christian Terror in Europe? The Bible in Anders Behring Breivik’s Manifesto DOI 10.1515/jbr-2017-2006 Abstract: In the attempts to understand the ideology underpinning the terror attack in Norway 22nd July 2011, and the growth of far-right extremism in Europe more generally, Christianity and the uses of the Bible are a largely neglected feature. In this article, I examine the way in which the Bible is used in Anders Behring Breivik’s manifesto, arguing that this provides an important example of the role of Christianity in far-right discourse. I show that the Bible functions as a legitimating device, glossing violence as defense of a Christian Europe; as a motivational instrument, positing God as a fellow fighter; and, as an origin for Europe. The Bible is situated in a pre-modern state where its signifying powers are policed. At the same time, it is wrenched out of this solidified framework, cut up and pasted into the manifesto hypertext in order to serve as a contemporary ally to an anti-Muslim and anti-multicultural cause. Keywords: Terror; Bible; Christianity; far right; Breivik; Europe. 1 Introduction On 22nd July 2011, Anders Behring Breivik dressed in a fake police uniform, drove to the Government Headquarters (the government office buildings), in Oslo (Regjeringskvartalet) and planted a bomb, which detonated shortly thereafter. He then gained entry to the island of Utøya, where the Norwegian Labour party’s youth organization [Arbeidernes Ungdomsfylking (AUF)] held their annual political summer camp, and shot indiscriminately at the young people there.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Responses to Political Mass Shootings in the United States and Norway
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Sociology & Criminal Justice Theses & Dissertations Sociology & Criminal Justice Summer 2016 What Can State Talk Tell Us About Punitiveness? A Comparison of Responses to Political Mass Shootings in The United States and Norway Kimberlee G. Waggoner Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/sociology_criminaljustice_etds Part of the Criminology Commons, Scandinavian Studies Commons, and the Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons Recommended Citation Waggoner, Kimberlee G.. "What Can State Talk Tell Us About Punitiveness? A Comparison of Responses to Political Mass Shootings in The United States and Norway" (2016). Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Dissertation, Sociology & Criminal Justice, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/6e42-3262 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/sociology_criminaljustice_etds/10 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Sociology & Criminal Justice at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology & Criminal Justice Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WHAT CAN STATE TALK TELL US ABOUT PUNITIVENESS? A COMPARISON OF RESPONSES TO POLITICAL MASS SHOOTINGS IN THE UNITED STATES AND NORWAY by Kimberlee G. Waggoner B.S. May 2009, Northern Arizona University M.S. May 2011, Northern Arizona University A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY CRIMINOLOGY AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August 2016 Approved by: Randolph Myers (Director) Mona J.E. Danner (Member) Tim Goddard (Member) ABSTRACT WHAT CAN STATE TALK TELL US ABOUT PUNITIVENESS? A COMPARISON OF RESPONSES TO POLITICAL MASS SHOOTINGS IN THE UNITED STATES AND NORWAY Kimberlee G.
    [Show full text]
  • Calamus Gladio Fortior: El Manifest Terrorista
    CALAMUS GLADIO FORTIOR: EL MANIFEST TERRORISTA Kaczynski, Breivik i Tarrant TREBALL FINAL DE GRAU Autor: Iván Quintana Fernández Tutor: Dr. Mario Toboso Buezo 2020 NIUB: 16875434 Grau de Seguretat Universitat de Barcelona Institut de Seguretat Pública de Catalunya “La paraula en mans d'algú hàbil pot fer més mal que l’arma en mans d'un guerrer.” Buda Gautama (col·lecció dels discursos llargs) Calamus Gladio Fortior: la ploma és més forta que l’espasa. Agraïments: Al meu tutor, el Dr. Mario Toboso, que és l’exemple del que és ser un molt bon professor. A en Christian Pachón i l’Anna Marín, que m’han impedit saber que se sent al realitzar un grau sense la millor companyia possible. A les meves tietes, a l’Antonio, a l’Alba i a l’Albert. Calamus Gladio Fortior: El manifest terrorista. Taula de continguts 1. Abstracte ...................................................................................................... 1 2. Paraules Clau .............................................................................................. 1 3. Introducció ................................................................................................... 2 3.1 Introducció al problema ......................................................................... 2 3.2 Motivacions ........................................................................................... 3 3.3 Preguntes d’investigació ....................................................................... 5 3.4 Hipòtesis ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Surveying the Landscape of the American Far Right
    SURVEYING THE LANDSCAPE OF THE AMERICAN FAR RIGHT MARK PITCAVAGE AUGUST 2019 PITCAVAGE | PROGRAM ON EXTREMISM About the Program on as an expert witness in a number of trials. Since Extremism 2000, Dr. Pitcavage has worked for the Anti- Defamation League, one of the nation’s oldest civil The Program on Extremism at George rights organizations, where he currently serves as a Washington University p r o v i d e s Senior Research Fellow in ADL’s Center on analysis on issues related to violent and Extremism. In the past, Dr. Pitcavage has also non-violent extremism. The Program been Director of the Center on Extremism. Prior to spearheads innovative and thoughtful joining ADL, Dr. Pitcavage was Research Director academic inquiry, producing empirical for the Justice Department’s State and Local Anti- work that strengthens extremism Terrorism Training Program. Dr. Pitcavage research as a distinct field of study. The received his MA and Ph.D. from The Ohio State Program aims to develop pragmatic University in Columbus, Ohio, where he still lives policy solutions that resonate with and works. policymakers, civic leaders, and the general public. The views expressed in this paper are About the Author solely those of the author, and not necessarily those of the Program on Dr. Mark Pitcavage is a historian with 25 Extremism or the George Washington University. years’ expertise on domestic terrorism and right-wing extremism in the United States, having authored many articles, reports and studies on related subjects; trained over 17,000 government officials and law enforcement officers; and served SURVEYING THE LANDSCAPE OF THE AMERICAN FAR RIGHT 1 PITCAVAGE | PROGRAM ON EXTREMISM Introduction What is the extreme right in the United States? To many, terms such as “extreme right” and “far right” are simply synonymous with white supremacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorism Threat Assessment 2019
    2019Terrorism Threat Assessment NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND PREPAREDNESS UNCLASSIFIED ABOUT US The New Jersey Office of Homeland Security and Preparedness (NJOHSP) is tasked with coordinating counterterrorism, resiliency, and cybersecurity efforts across all levels of government, law enforcement, nonprofit organizations, and the private sector. Created by Executive Order in 2006 when the Office of Counterterrorism (OCT) merged with staff from the Domestic Security Preparedness Task Force (DSPTF), NJOHSP bolsters New Jersey’s resources for counterterrorism, critical infrastructure protection, preparedness, training, and federal grants management. Shortly after the tragic events of September 11, 2001, New Jersey’s legislature and Governor passed and signed the Domestic Security Preparedness Act, which created the DSPTF within the Office of the Attorney General. In 2002, the Governor created the OCT by Executive Order, which remained under the Attorney General. OCT provided New Jersey with a single agency to lead and coordinate New Jersey’s counterterrorism efforts with state, local, and federal authorities and with the private sector. Mission NJOHSP leads and coordinates New Jersey’s counterterrorism, cybersecurity, and preparedness efforts while building resiliency throughout the State. Core Values SERVICE. We put our State and its citizens first, and we put Mission before self. We take pride in being timely, accurate, and relevant. TEAMWORK. We stand with and behind each other. We recognize that partnerships, both internal and external, are critical to achieving success. We cannot fulfill our Mission alone. EXCELLENCE. We take great pride in the quality of our work. We do every task, every project, every initiative, to the best of our ability.
    [Show full text]
  • State Terrorism in the Philippines Unmasking the Securitized Terror Behind ‘War on Drugs’
    MSc. Crisis & Security Management Thesis - Spring 2017 Leiden University, The Hague Campus State Terrorism in the Philippines Unmasking the securitized terror behind ‘War on Drugs’ Master Thesis, Spring 2017 George Plevris (s1722026) Supervisor: Dr. M. Kitzen Second Reader: Liesbeth van der Heide University of Leiden- The Hague Campus Master MSc. Crisis & Security Management May 2017 Leiden University 1 MSc. Crisis & Security Management Thesis - Spring 2017 By the end of this paper, I believe you will come to the same observation that I arrived: Terror (-ism) is the finest tool of political and social governance a state can deploy. If executed well, it does not only achieve the goal of submission of the audience, but it eliminates the latter’s tool of resistance: hope. Leiden University 2 MSc. Crisis & Security Management Thesis - Spring 2017 Abstract Typically, modern states have the monopoly on legitimate violence drawn from their sovereignty and democratic rule of law, on the behest of their citizens. This ‘legitimate’ violence however has seen a rise in the last two decades, and taken forms of intricate civil wars, wars on crime, wars on drugs and wars on terror. Yet, despite outcries for violations of laws and human rights, of crimes against humanity and war crimes, policies of extreme violence performed by the democratic states are hardly ever labeled as state terrorism. This paper will explore the scholarship of state terrorism, often a contested topic among academic and experts, and will approach the issue through the current ‘war on drugs’ raging in the Philippines. The theoretical premise that I will carve out aims to explore and acknowledge the existence of state terror but also the difficulty in naming it.
    [Show full text]