LAW OFFICES KAUFFELT 8 KAUFFELT 300 CAPITOL STREET STE 803
JAMES D. KAVFFELT CHARLESTON, WEST VIRGINIA 25301 MAILINC, ADDRESS 0. BOX MARK E. KAUFFELT (304)345- 1272 P. 3082 - CHARLESTON, WV 25331-3082 T D. KAUFFELT June 10,2009 FAX (304)345-1280 OF COUNSEL Sandra Squire Executive Secretary Public Service Commission of WV 201 Brooks Street P.O. Box 812 Charleston, WV 25323 Re: Logan County Public Service District - Upper Little Hearts Creek Water Project
Dear Ms. Squire:
Enclosed for filing in the above-styled matter is the original and twelve copies of the following:
(1) FormNo. 4; (2) Form No. 14; (3) Preliminary Engineering Report for the Proposed Upper Little Hearts Creek Water Project; and (4) Little Upper Harts Creek Water Extension Project Rule 42 Exhibit;
Also enclosed is one original of the following:
(1) Project Manual; (2) Construction Drawings for Upper Little Hearts Creek Waterline Extension Project; and (3) Design Report.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Very truly yours,
MEWmmw Enclosures xc: Logan County PSD 02 47 02 p 06-1 0-2009 12 304 946 2645 LOGAN COUNTY PSD LOGAN COUNTY PSD in 2
Form No. 4 APPLICATION FOR A CERT’IFTCATEOF CONVENIENCE AND NRCESSfn
State of West Virginia Public Service Cammiksion Charleston
Case No,
Application of Logan Cowty Public Service District for a certificate of convenjenco and necessity to construct improvements to jts water system, ncar upper Ljttle Hearts Creek in the County of Logan. Comes now the above-namcd Logan County Public Smite District, the petitioner herein, and respectfully show the Commission as follows:
1, Thnt the name and address of the pcdtioner is Logan County Public Service Disrrict, P.O. Box 506. Logan, WV256Qt.
2. That the applicant pmposes to construct additions and improvements to its existing water distribution system, to furnish water to approximately 97 CUStOmerS in Lincoln County commtmitia$ of Little Hearts Creek, Harvey Fork, Mudtick Branch, Gaitin Fork and Laurel Fork.
3. Service is not now rendered by an existing utility, oorpor;rtivn or person, 4. Attached hereto is a copy of the effective charter of incorporation of the applicant. (If charter has horntofore been filed, state style and easc number; if appljcant is a municipdity, give citation to legislative or governmental act where charter may be found.)
5, A cartificate should be issued for the foIlowhg rcmms: Ta provide safe, potable water for 97 custmcrb in the communities of Little Hearts Crcck, Harvey Fork, Mudlick Branch, Gnrtin Fork and Laurel Fork. NOTE; This application must be accompanied by information required by Rule 42. Water and Sewer utilities must include information required by thc Chcckljst set forth in Rule 26.1 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Promdute.
Dated this 9* dav of June. 2009, 13 P (Signed) i m rizedrepresebtativc of applicant 0rn P 3: T. rc rn $? a Attorney.
Address: P.O. Box 3085, Charleston, WV 25332-3082
Subscribcd and sw rSL& 3 20Ei
t is signing out-of-state, please use verification FbiTtl No. 121 I ii I. ! i to the preserva ion of public health, comfort and convenience of said area. i Therefore, upon proper motion and second the County Comnission of Logan County i does hereby ORDER the e~tab7ishmentof and does establish and create a public i .I service dt’strict under the provisions of Chapter 16, ArticTe 13A, Section 2 i of the West. Virginia Statutory Code to have all of the powers enumerated in i jajd Chapter and ArtScle.. Said public sewfce district shall be known as I
.ogan County Public Service Ilistrfct. . ... I.----I- . It I’s further ORDERED that the Logan County Public Service District hall embrace the following territory: A71 af Logan County; I Excluding, however: I All of the municfpafity af Logan: I All of the municipality of Chapmanvifle; All of the municipatity of Man; ”. A17 of the Buffalo Creek Pub’ll’c Service Dfstrlct of the Triadefphia i Nagisterial Distrfct of the County of Logan, West Vfrg.in.ia, more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point 5n the Spring Mountafn Luokout Tower, said point being in tbe Baone-Logan * -* County Ifne; thence, southeasterly with the meanders of said Boone-Logan County lfne 4.25 miles, more or Ips, to a point Sn the comnon.corner to Boone-tlyoming and Logan CounEy; thence, - . . southwesterly with the meanders of the tfyomfng-Logan County line and with the top of Buffalo Mountain 10.65 mjles, more or less, to I point 5n the 37O - 45’ meridfan The; thence, due 1I West with safd 3f0 - 45’ meridian 75ne 5.85 mffes, more or fess, i to a point fq the eastern corporate boundary fine of City of I . Man; thence, due Morth. 1.65 miles, mor@ or ’less, to a point In i the Logan-TriadeTphia Magisterial District 1 ;ne; thence :i northeasterly with the meanders of said Magisterial line T5.95 ! des, more or ?ess, to the place of beginning and containing 43.55 square mites (27,870 acres), m~reor less. : id territory and said exclusions are more particularly shown by a map
Logan County attached hereto and incorporated as a part hereof and outTined I ? red.
1 i
-2- li - v- .
'.. .) - I .. . 'i
' 'RESOLUTION
iI WREREAS, on the 5th day of May, 7975, the County Commission of Logan i I county wi71 consfder proposing the creation of a public service district ,j within Logan County, to be known as the Logan County PubTSc Service District, 1 1 and to fnelude the fol?awing territory: 0. . ... A17 of Logan County; I Exc?ud.ing, however: i * *-*------. A71 of the municfpality of Logan; . A71 of the municipality of Chapmanviffe; All of the municfpality of Man; and At7 of the Buffalo Creek Public ServPce Distrfct of the Trfadelphia i Magisterial District of the County of Logan, West Vi.rgfnla. WHEREAS, the municfpa7fty of West Logan cannot be included within the I I' boundaries of this proposed pubtic service district without -Its canrent;
* WEREAS, the City Councif of West Logan be'lleves that the proposed-- pubfic sewice district will be conduc9ve.to the preservation of the publfc heaTth, comfort and convenience of the municipality of West Logan and a77 I'. I of Logan County; :I THEREFORE, f3E IT RESOLVED that the munfcfpality of West Logan does i hereby consent to be included withh the boundaries of the proposed pyblfc f I service distrtct. 4 !"f!' I thfs. day of p 1975. Dated /fk' ! Tbd i 1 f I.
.. RESOLUTION
/ WEREAS, on the f day of I.- ,,’. -7 d*.-*::: , 1975, the County Commission of Logan County will consider proposing the creation of a public service district within Logan County, to .be known as the Logan County Fkhlic Service Distr‘ict, and to include the following territory: All of Logan county; I Excluding, however: . All of the municipality of Logan; All of the municipdity of Chaprnanvi1I.e; All of the municipality of Man; and I All of the Buffalo Creek Public Service District of the’TedeSphia Magisterial District of the County of Logan, West Virginia. I WHEREAS, the municipality of Mitchell Heights cannot be included within the boundaries of this proposed public service district without its consent; WHEREAS, the City Council of Mitchell Heights believes that the proposed public service district will be conductive to the preservation of the public health, comfort and convenience of the municipality of Mitchell Heights and all of Logan County;
L THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the municipality$ of -’ Mitchell Heights does hereby consent to be included within the boundaries of the proposed public service district, subject to and upon tne follo;.iing cmditions: ,-
1.. All construction within the Tom of Mitchell Heights shall comply with the ordinances of the tom, including those Hereafter enacted.
I 2. The location of and plans for all facilities in the \ Town must have the prior written approval of the Town of I He3 ghts .
Upon norion this meeting is contfnued and sdjourned to chc next
Regular Session co be held on Frfday, 3cptember 5, 1975, at 1O:OO o'cIuck
I..H.
PRSS IDEM: Form No. 14 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON
Entered by the Public Service Commission of West Virginia9in the City of Charleston on the __. day of
CASE NO,
NAME OF APPLICANT: Logan County Public Service District P.0, Box 506 Logan, WV 25601
Application for a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity to construct upgrades to its water trcatment facilities.
NOTICE OF FILING
\WEmAS, on June 9,2009, the Logan County Public Service District filed m application, duly verified, for a Certificate to coiistruct certain additions and irnprovem,ents to its water treatment facilities in Logan County. The application is an file with and available for public inspection ai the Public Smvice Commission, 201 Brooks Street, in Charleston, West Virginia,
MPIEREAS, the proposed project will provide potable water service to approximately 97 potential custom.ers (290 persons) in the Lincoln County communities of Little Hearts Creek, Harvey Fork, h4udlick Bran.ch, Gartin Fork and. Laurcl. Fork. The project will connect: to an 8- inch main (Aten,vilIe Water Project) along County Route 68 and.extended along County Routes 68 and 68/1 in easterly and southerly d,irecti.ons,respectively. Branch l.ines will bs extended. along County Routes 68/2,68/3 and. 68/4.
WHEREAS, the proposed project consists of the construction of approximately 30,100 linear feci of 8-inch and smaller diameter water main, one 90 gallons per minute booster station, one 95.000 gallons storage tank, 20 Are hydrants, valves, meters and othcr related appurienancas. Water will be provided by the District’s Northern Regional Water Treatment Plant.
WHEREAS, the Logan County Public Service District estimates that the project costs will be approximately $2,710,000, It is proposed that the project will be financed by a Small Cities Block Grant of $1,500,000, Infrastructure Fund Grant of $4 10,000 and an Ifiastructure Loan of $800,000 at zero (0) percent interest for 40 years. WHEREAS, the utility anticipates no change in rates for its customers as a result of ths project.
Logan County Public Servi,ce District has no resale water customers.
Pursuant to $24-2-11, West Virginia Code, IT IS OWERED that the ]Logan County Public Service District give notice of the filing of' said appiioation, by publishing a copy of this order once in a newspaper duly qualified by the Secretary of State, published and of general circulation in Mingo, Boone, Wyoming, Lincoln and Logan Counties, making due return to this Comnlission of proper certification of publication immediately &ar publication. Anyone desiring to protest or intervene should flle a written protest OT notice of intervention within 30 days fdowing the date of this publication unless otherwise modified by Commission order. Failure to timely protest or intervene can affcct your right to protest aspects of this certificate case, including any associated rate increases, or to paxticipate in future pmceedings. All protests or requests to intervene should briefly state the reason for the protest or intenention. Requests to intervene must comply with the Cornmission's rules on intervention set forth in ths Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. A11 protests and interventions should be addressed to Sandra Squire, Executive Secretary, P. O,-Box 8 12$ Chadeston, N7est Virginia T)<.29-2
IT JS FURTHER ORDERED that if no protests are. raceivcd within said thirty (30) day period, the Commission may waive formal hearing and grant the application based on the Evidence submitted with said application nnd its review thereof.
Executive Secretary PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT
FOR THE PROPOSED
,
UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER PROJECT
April, 2009
Prepared By: Rick Roberts, P.E., Project Manager E. L. Robinson Engineering Company 5088 Washington Street, West Charleston, West Virginia 25313 Phone: (304)776-7473 Fax: (304)776-6426 E-mail: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION ...... 1
11. CURRENT SITUATION ...... 10
111. FUTURE SITUATION ...... 12
IV. ALTERNATIVES ...... 13
V. PLAN SELECTION AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION...... 14
VI. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION ...... 15
VII. PROJECT SUMMARY ...... 16
APPENDICES
A. Logan County PSD Creation Order B. Expansion Orders-Lincoln County C. Location, Project and System Maps D. Treatment Plant Site Plans and Diagrams E. Well Testing Results F. Environmental Letters G. Funding Commitment Letters H. Customer Listing I. Existing/Proposed Tariff J. Permit Sumniary/Status K. Project Schedule L. ROW Summary
1 I. INTRODUCTION
Logan County Public Service District was created in 1975 to provide water and wastewater service to the majority of the rural areas of Logan County (See Appendix A). In 1979, the District's boundaries were reduced slightly when the communities of Clothier and Mufflin were officially removed to be included within the boundaries of the Boone County Public Service District (formerly known as the Spruce Fork Public Service District).
By Order dated May 5, 1994, the Logan County Commission expanded the District's boundaries to include the Huff Creek area of Wyoming County. This expansion was approved by the Public Service Commission of West Virginia by Final Order dated October 18, 1994 (PSC Case No. 94-0403-PWD-PC).
By Order dated November 7, 1994, the Logan County Commission expanded the District's boundaries to include the Harts Creek area of Lincoln County. This expansion was approved by the Public Service Commission of West Virginia by Final Order dated May 3, 1995 (PSC Case No. 94-1065-PWD-PC). Copies of these Orders are included in Appendix B.
By Order dated October 6, 1997, the Logan County Commission expanded the District's boundaries to include the Verner and Spice Creek areas of Mingo County. This expansion was approved by the Public Service Commission of West Virginia by Final Order dated April 2, 1998 (PSC Case No. 97-1370-PWD-PC).
The Logan County Public Service District boundaries currently include all of Logan County except: the municipalities of Logan, Chapmanville and Man; the Buffalo Creek Public Service District; and the Clothier and Mufflin areas which, as stated earlier, are in the Boone County Public Service District. Also included are the Huff Creek area of Wyoming County, the Harts Creek area of Lincoln County, and the Verner and Spice Creek areas of Mingo County.
Since its creation in 1975, the District has worked diligently to provide public water and wastewater service to the unserved or under served areas within its boundaries. To date the District has enjoyed some success; however, several areas are still in need of safe, reliable drinking water and wastewater service.
The District currently owns and operates eight (8) separate water systems that provide service to approximately 9,526 customers. The District also owns and operates one (1) wastewater system serving approximately 1,066 customers. The District operates, through an agreement with the Eastern Wyoming Public Service District, one (1) water system in the Mullens, Itmann, Route 16 and surrounding areas of Wyoming County which serves approximately 1,246 customers. The following is a brief description of each of these water systems:
1 NORTHERN REGIONAL WATER SYSTEM- The Northern Regional Water System is named for the District's new 2,800 gallons per minute (upgradable to 5,600 gallons per minute) Northern Regional Water Treatment Plant which began operations in late 2002. The service area includes all areas formerly included in the District's Big Creek, Trace Fork, Island Creek and Justice/Phico Water Systems. The original Island Creek and Justice/Phico Water Systems were purchased from the former J. C. Evans Utilities in 1992. The remaining systems were originally built and/or extended through the construction of fifleen (1 5) major projects from 1979 to the present. The distribution system consists of twelve (12) water storage tanks, nine (9) conventional booster stations, four (4) booster stations with bladder tanks and distribution lines. The system currently provides service to approximately 6,025 customers in the Town of Mitchell Heights and the unincorporated areas of Monitor, Wilkinson, Monaville, Switzer, Sarah Ann, Cow Creek, Whitman Creek, Bradshaw Hollow, Pine Creek, Trace Fork, Banco, Big Creek, North Fork, Kitchen, Stone Branch, Limestone Branch, Daisy, Toney, Green Shoals Branch, Ferrellsburg, Harts, Sawmill Road, Justice Addition, Henlawson, Upper Crooked Creek, Pecks Mill, Phico, Godby Heights, Godby Branch, Pigeon Roost, Mill Creek, Hewett Creek, Barker Fork, Gore Fork, Hainer Branch, Rocklick Branch, Garrett Fork, Atenville, Big Harts Creek, Little Harts Creek and Sand Creek.
GREENVILLE WATER SYSTEM- The original Greenville Water System was constructed in 1985 with major extensions in 1987,1989,1990,1994 and 1999. The system consists of a 700 gallons per minute treatment plant, six storage tanks, two booster stations and distribution lines. The system currently serves approximately 1,789 customers in the communities of Greenville, Landville, Bruno, Christian, Huff Junction, Green Valley, Mallory, Davin, Mineral City, Claypool, Combs Addition, Gillman Bottom, Cooks Addition, Taplin, Earling, Elk Creek, Verner, Spice Creek, Huff Creek, Campus, Cyclone and Lacoma.
RUM CREEK WATER SYSTEM - The original Rum Creek Water System was constructed in 1984 with major extensions in 1990, 1992 and 1994. It consists of two booster stations, two storage tanks and distribution lines. Water for the system is purchased from the Logan Water Board. Approximately 308 customers are currently served by the system in the communities of Rum Junction, Lyburn, Dehue, Neibert, Madison Creek, Rita, Orville and Yolyn.
MUD FORK WATER SYSTEM - The Mud Fork Water System, constructed in 1984, consists of distribution lines only. Water for the system is purchased from the Logan Water Board. Approximately 140 customers in the community of Upper Mud Fork are currently served by the system.
STOLLINGS WATER SYSTEM - The Stollings Water System was purchased in 1992 from the former J.C. Evans Utilities. A major extension and upgrade project was completed in 1996. The system consists of two conventional booster stations, one booster station with bladder tanks, two storage tanks and distribution lines. Water for the system is purchased from the Logan Water Board. Approximately 6 14 customers are currently served by the system in the communities of Stollings, McConnell, Melville, Sunbeam, Fort Branch, Red Campbell, Wanda, Ethel, Freeze Fork and the Logan County Airport.
2 SUNSET COURT WATER SYSTEM - The Sunset Court Water System was purchased from the former J.C. Evans Utilities in 1992. It consists of two booster stations with bladder tanks and distribution lines. Water for the system is purchased from the Chapmanville Water and Sewer Board. The system currently serves approximately 157 customers in the communities of Airport Road, Sunset Court, Conley Branch and Hidden Valley.
RIDGEVIEW ESTATES WATER SYSTEM - The Ridgeview Estates Water System was acquired in 1998 from the Ridgeview Estates Association. It consists of one booster station, one storage tank and distribution system. Water for the system is purchased from the Chapmanville Water and Sewer Board. The system currently serves approximately 30 customers in the Ridgeview Estates Subdivision.
CRAWLEY CREEK WATER SYSTEM - The Crawley Creek Water System was constructed in 2000 and consists of two storage tanks, one booster station and distribution lines. Water for this system is purchased from the Chapmanville Water and Sewer Board. Approximately 463 customers in the communities of Crawley Creek, Canoe Branch, Striker Fork, Brushy Fork, Tims Fork, Three Forks of Crawley, and the Chief Logan State Part Conference Center are served by the system.
EASTERN WYOMING PSD WATER SYSTEM - Logan County Public Service District entered into an agreement on August 30,2001 to provide operation, maintenance and management services for systems owned by Eastern Wyoming Public Service District. The Stephenson Water System currently provides water service to approximately 1,246 customers in the City of Mullens and unincorporated areas of Black Eagle, Corinne, Beechwood, Allen Junction, Wyco, Iroquois, Stephenson and Itmann. The original system was constructed in the 1940's but has recently been significantly upgraded. The current system consists of a 1,400 gallons per minute ground water treatment plant, three tanks with total storage capacity of 900,000 gallons, 75,670 feet of 16-inch and smaller diameter mains, fire hydrants, valves and other related items.
In addition to the eight (8) water systems owned and operated by Logan County PSD, six (6) other entities own and operate water systems in Logan County (See Table 1 as follows).
TABLE 1 LOGAN COUNTY WATER UTILITIES
Utility Name Customers Served Logan County PSD 9,526 Buffalo Creek PSD 1,130 Boone County PSD 120 City of Logan 2,300 Town of Chapmanville 965 Town of Man 445 West Logan Water Company -450 Total 14,936
3 The District takes great pride in the quality of its operations. It has established programs to monitor such critical, but often overlooked, aspects of its operations such as water accountability, meter testing, inventory control, vehicle 0 & M expense, etc. To extend the life of its systems and improve reliability the District has developed and implemented an aggressive preventive maintenance program. The meter testing and vehicle 0 & M expense programs are computerized and the water accountability and preventive maintenance programs are on schedule to be computerized in the near future. The District has computerized and integrated its payroll, billing system and other financial records. The computer system is networked and sized to handle projected growth for many years. Hand held meter readers are used to reduce manpower requirements and improve accuracy. Meters are being converted to “touch read” and “radio read” as funds allow to further improve accuracy and efficiency. Approximately 7,000 of the District’s meters have been converted to date. The District has, for the previous several years, been making decisions based upon its twenty-year plan in order to prepare for expansion into additional areas.
The District Board has a combined total of over 40 years of service and is comprised of highly motivated business oriented individuals. The District employs a Certified Public Accountant as its General Manager. It’s Staff of 33 includes two Class IV, one Class 111, two Class 11, and two Class I Water System operators; one Class I1 Wastewater System operator and has over 400 years of combined water and wastewater system related experience.
District personnel are experienced in the planning and implementation of extensions to its systems. Since its creation in 1975, the District has completed twenty-eight (28) major water projects (See Table 2 as follows). Applications for funding were prepared by District personnel and the majority of the administration was done by District personnel. On several projects District personnel provided technical services including preliminary design, design review, shop drawing review, construction inspection, coordination and closeout, etc. Essentially all of these projects were completed on time and within or below budget.
4 TABLE 2 MAJOR PROJECTS COMPLETED Year Customers Pro iect Completed Proiect Cost Served Big Creek 1979 $800,000.00 210 Rum Junction 1984 380,000.00 80 Mud Fork 1984 620,000.00 125 Greenville 1985 1,250,000.00 80 Sharples 1985 760,000.00 125 LandvilleKhri st ian 1987 820,000.00 230 Huff JunctiodGreen Valley 1989 440,000.00 120 Mallory/Davin 1991 980,000.00 270 Neibert Taplin 1992 2,400,000.00 280 Mineral CityKooks Addition 1994 1,230,000.00 3 90 Crooked Creek 1994 890,000.00 70 Rum Creek 1994 1,120,000.00 110 Godby Branch 1995 760,000.00 90 Cow Creek 1996 5,500,000.00 300 Dingess Run 1996 1,400,000.00 270 Trace Fork 1996 1,100,000.00 140 Whitman Creek 1997 2,000,000.00 50 Regional Jail 1997 2,000,000.00 5 Harts Creek 1997 2,300,000.00 360 Elk CreeWVerner 1998 1,550,000.00 200 Mill Creek Phase I 2000 8,600,000.00 870 Crawley Creek 2000 4,840,000.00 540 Pine Creek 2000 2,400,000.00 25 Mill Creek Phase I1 & 111 2002 7,500,000.00 NIA Garrett Fork 2002 2,400,000.00 240 Atenville 2004 2,600,000.00 360 Huff Creek 2004 4,140,000.00 440 Rocky/Caney Branch 2006 2,140,000.00 -160 Totals $62,920,000.00 6,140
The District currently has two (2) water project funded and under construction (See Table 3 as follows).
TABLE 3 MAJOR PROJECTS UNDERWAY Customers Pro iect Proiect Cost Served North Fork $ 2,700,000.00 140 Holden 8,400,000.00 -690 Totals $ 11,100,000.00 830 Several other water projects have been identified and are in the development stage (See Table 4 as follows).
TABLE 4 FUTURE DISTRICT WATER PROJECTS Estimated Potential Proiect Name CountMies) Proiect Cost Customers Big HartdShively Logan & Lincoln 4,500,000 350 Marsh Fork Logan 2,910,000 109 Upper Little Harts Creek Lincoln 2,710,000 97 Anchor Road Boone 5,000,000 123 Dollie/Leet . Lincoln 3,300,000 164 Totals $1 8,420,000 843
The District owns a significant amount of construction equipment including: one Caterpillar 307 B Excavator; one Kubota Model KH 170L Excavator with rock hammer; one New Holland 555 E Backhoe; one Case Model 480E Backhoe; two Kubota Model B20 Backhoes; one Kubota B2 1 Backhoe; one Case TL 1000 Hand Trencher; one American Auger H- 12 Boring Machine capable of doing 4,8 and 12-inch bores; one Sullair 130 DPQJD Air Compressor; one Chicago Pneumatic CP 90 Air Compressor with Jackhammer and Road Mole; one 1-Ton Dump Truck; one 2-Ton Dump Truck; four equipment trailers as well as such smaller items as demolition saws, compactors, welders, etc. The District’s service fleet includes sixteen various sized vehicles. Each of these vehicles is fitted with a Motorola Max Trax 100 radio which, when used in conjunction with the base station located at the main office, maintains an excellent line of communication between all employees throughout the District’s service area.
The District maintains a dedicated construction crew, which works full-time on “in house” projects to upgrade and extend its systems. To date several projects have been completed using this approach (See Table 5 as follows). Each of these “in-house” projects was designed, bid and constructed by District staff with District equipment. This has been a very successful program, which the District intends to continue. Several additional “in-house” projects are presently in various stages of planning, design and construction.
6 TABLE 5 “IN - HOUSE” PROJECTS COMPLETED
PROJECT NAME YEAR COMPLETED PROJECT COST Limestone Branch 1992 $ 40,000.00 Pigeon Roost Phase I 1995 90,000.00 Henlawson - Phase I 1996 70,000.00 Dingess Run - Phase I 1997 20,000.00 Godby Heights Road 1997 30,000.00 Pigeon Roost - Phase I1 1998 70,000.00 Wilkinson Upgrade 1998 14,000.00 Bentley Branch Upgrade 1998 29,000.00 Whitman Creek Upgrade 1999 153,000.00 Atenville Grade School 2000 100,000.00 Bandmill Hollow 2000 80,000.00 Conley Branch 2000 30,000.00 Lower Switzer Upgrade 200 1 80,000.00 Wheatley Branch 200 1 125,000.00 Total $ 93 1,000.00
In 1975, it was estimated that approximately thirty percent of residents of Logan County had access to a safe reliable public water source. At that time, the Logan County Commission identified the need to establish an entity to provide water and wastewater service to the remaining unserved and undeserved areas of the County. Logan County PSD was cieated to be that entity and was delegated the responsibility of achieving the Commission’s goal of providing safe, reliable water and wastewater service to all residents of Logan County. Since its creation, the District has taken this responsibility very seriously; accordingly, it has adopted the Commission’s goal as its own.
To accomplish its goal, the District has adopted the strategy of identifying as many potential projects as possible, then pursuing funding for all of them at the same time. Projects and potential funding sources are “matched” based upon each project’s perceived qualifiers. For example, when it became apparent that Abandoned Mined Lands (AML) monies could be used to fund water projects, the District identified approximately fourteen (1 4) projects in areas where significant pre-law mining had occurred and submitted AML Applications for each. Similarly, projects serving low to moderate income areas were “matched” to the Small Cities Block Grant (SCBG) program, projects representing an enhanced potential for economic growth were “matched” with the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) or Economic Development Administration (EDA) programs, etc. If funding is not forthcoming from the initial source, an alternate source is identified and pursued. This aggressive approach has worked well in Logan County; however, it requires a great deal of hard work and flexibility.
A major obstacle to the achievement of the District’s goal was the existence of numerous privately owned water systems in the county. These systems varied greatly in size and provided marginal to substandard service. To date twenty-nine (29) of these systems have been acquired by the District (See Table 6 as follows). Each of these systems has been either replaced or upgraded. TABLE 6 DISTRICT ACQUIRED WATER SYSTEMS
Year -Name Acauired Status
J.C.Evans Utilities, Inc. a) Queen Justice 1992 Partial Upgrade b) Phico/Godby 1992 Partial Upgrade c) Whitman Creek 1992 Partial Upgrade d) Sunset Court 1992 Partial Upgrade e) Stollings/McConnell 1992 Partial Upgrade f) Switzer 1992 Partial Upgrade g) Monaville 1992 Partial Upgrade
Dingess - Rum Coal Company a) Dehue 1991 Replaced b) Orville 1994 Replaced c) Yolyn 1994 Replaced d) Dingess Run 1996 Replaced
Appalachian Water & Sewer Development. Assoc. a) Lyburn 1984 Replaced b) Greenville 1985 Replaced c) Sharples 1985 Replaced d) Landville 1987 Replaced e) Bruno 1987 Replaced f) Christian 1987 Replaced g) Mallory 1991 Replaced h)Taplin 1992 Replaced I) Earling 1992 Replaced j) Rita 1992 Replaced k) Neibert 1992 Replaced 1) Gillman Bottom 1994 Replaced in) Mineral City 1994 Replaced
Ridgeview Estates Homeowner Association a) Ridgeview 1998 Minor Upgrade
Enaloc Water Corporation a) Rossmore 1999 Partial Upgrade b) Chauncy 1999 Partial Upgrade c) Stirrat 1999 Partial Upgrade
Holden Water System 2006 Replaced The proposed Upper Little Harts Creek Water Extension Project will provide potable water service to approximately 97 potential customers (290 persons) in the Lincoln County communities of Little Harts Creek, Harvey Fork, Mudlick Branch, Gartin Fork and Laurel Fork. The project will connect to an 8-inch main (Atenville Water Project) along County Route 68 and extend along County Route 68 and 68/1 in easterly and southerly directions, respectively. Branch lines will be extended along County Route 68/2, 6813 and 68/4. Water for the area will be produced by Logan County Public Service District's Northern Regional Water Treatment Plant. Location, Project and System Maps are included in Appendix C.
The project consists of the construction of approximately 30,100 linear feet of 6-inch and smaller diameter water main, one 90 gallons per minute booster station, one 95,000 gallon water storage tank, fire hydrants, valves, individual customer meters and other related appurtenances. Construction and project costs are estimated to be $2,321,000 and 2,710,000, respectively.
The information in this report is offered to assist in obtaining approval for a new water system to serve the Upper Little Harts Creek area of Lincoln County. Details of the project are contained in later sections of this report.
9 11. CURRENT SITUATION
All residents and businesses within the project area currently obtain their water from privately owned wells. Logan County Public Service District’s Northern Regional Water System abuts the project area and was designed to facilitate the future extension of potable water service into this area. The Northern Regional Water System will provide water to the area through an 8- inch main which is located along County Route 68 at the beginning of the project area.
Water for the Upper Little Harts Creek Water Project will be produced by the District‘s new Northern Regional Water Treatment Plant. This plant was completed in late 2002 and includes sedimentation, upflow clarification, filtration and disinfection. Site plans and diagrams of the treatment plant are included in Appendix D. The plant has a rated capacity of 2,800 gallons per minute and is easily upgradeable to 5,600 gallons per minute. It is currently operated approximately 8 hours per day and is in excellent condition. The source of raw water is the Guyandotte River which has adequate flows for the District’s current and future needs.
The Upper Little Harts Creek Project area currently has approximately 97 potential residential and small commercial customers. The residents in the area complain of water quality and quantity problems. Complaints include allegations that the well water contains iron, corrodes pipes and fixtures, stains cloths, has a strong sulfur odor and tastes bad. Many residents utilize home treatment units in an effort to improve the quality of water. The District has received several reports that wells in the area get low or go dry during certain times of the year. In 2005, to document the condition of the private wells in the project area, the District interviewed and tested well water at 80 potential customer’s homes (a summary of the interviews and testing results is included in Appendix E).
Logan County Public Service District will own and operate this extension of its system. The District currently employs the following water operators for its Logan County based water operations: -Name -Class Certificate No. Timmy R. Deskins IV-F 2009012784 Lonnie P. Compton IV-F 2009012116 Christopher R. Adkins 111-F 2010013409 Fredrick L. Belcher 11-F 2009000519 Ruth Ann Brown 11-F 20090 109 1 Samuel S Marcum I-F 2009012652 Ralph Adkins I-F 2009008536
10 The Logan County Public Service District holds the following permits for its Water Systems:
1) WV Department of Health 2) WV Public Service Commission 3) WV Department of Highways 4) WV Public Land Corporation 5) WV Division of Environmental Protection 6) CSX Transportation, Inc. 7) US Army Corps of Engineers
11 HI. FUTURE SITUATION
Based upon Projections Using State Short and Long Term Migration Averages (Year 2000 average birth and death rates, and the 1995-1990 inmigration and outmigration rates) obtained from the Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University, the population of Lincoln County is projected to increase through the year 2025. The following are Short and Long Term Population Projections throughout the year 2025:
-Year Short Term Long Term 1990 21,382 21,382 1995 22,098 22,098 2000 22,108 22,108 2005 22,532 2 1,805 2010 22,972 2 1,607 2015 23,419 2 1,500 2020 23,869 21,451 2025 24,287 21,436
It is important to note that the project is in an area of Lincoln County which is experiencing growth due to the availability of suitable land. Accordingly, it is anticipated that the population within the project area will increase slightly within the next 25 years. It is believed that the availability of a potable water supply for the area will result in the construction of new homes and some additional commercial development. Any additional water demand in the project area will be supplied by the District's Northern Regional Water Treatment Plant.
Average potential water demand for the project area will be around 14,550 gallons per/day (97 cust. X 150 gpd/cust.). This represents additional operating time of the Northern Regional Water Treatment Plant of around 6 minutes per day. Peak usages, as per the Draft WV Health Department Design Standards, are expected to be around 100 gpm; however, the duration of these peaks should be short lived and will be offset to a certain extent by the storage capacity of the system.
The following permits must be obtained in conjunction with the construction of this project: 1) WV Department of Health 2) WV Public Service Commission 3) WV Department of Highways 4) WV Public Land Corporation 5) WV Division of Environmental Protection 6) US Army Corps of Engineers 7) WV Infrastructure Council
12 IV. ALTERNATIVES
The existing conditions described in the previous sections clearly indicate that a non- action plan is not a viable alternative. Several alternatives exist for replacing the water supplies of the communities in the project area. The alternatives include bottled or trucked water, the provision of individual home water treatment systems, the replacement of wells, the extension of an existing public water system into the area, or the construction of a new treatment, storage and distribution system for the area.
The provision of bottled water, trucked water or individual home water treatment systems were not costed out. The logistics of delivering bottled or trucked water over a long period of time, and the inconvenience for the customer to utilize such water for cleaning, bathing, etc., makes this alternative impractical. Home treatment units are not reported to be completely successful at removing all the contaminants reported to exist in wells within the project area. Also, home treatment units would have to be maintained and replaced over the period of time until ground water quality significantly improves.
The replacement of wells within the study area is not a feasible solution. Residents have indicated that poor ground water quality is consistent throughout the study area. New wells drilled would likely produce the same poor quality water as current wells.
The Logan County Public Service District has an existing water system located adjacent to the Upper Little Harts Creek Project Area. Hence, there are two viable alternatives for supplying a potable water source to the residents of Upper Little Harts Creek; Alternative 1 - extend the existing water system adjacent to the project area and Alternative 2 - build a new water treatment facility. Alternative 1 is the only economically feasible possibility for supplying a potable water source to the Upper Little Harts Creek Project. A new water treatment plant would not be a feasible alternative since an existing potable water supply exists with adequate capacity and is in close proximity to the proposed project.
1
13 V. PLAN SELECTION and PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Based upon the information available, it is concluded that extension of the existing water system to serve the project area is the least costly and most reliable alternative available.
Selection of this alternative was a logical conclusion based upon the options available. The only option which provided satisfactory service to the area is the extension of a new water system adjacent to the project area. Because adequate capacity exists in the District's Northern Regional Water System adjacent to the project area, the construction of a new treatment system was deemed a significant and unnecessary added cost.
Citizen participation and public input for the project will be obtained following funding agency requirements. Additional public input will be requested in conjunction with flood plain notices and during the construction permitting process.
14 VI. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
In order to assess the potential environmental impacts of the Upper Little Harts Creek Project, the District has requested comments from the following state and federal agencies:
1) WV Division of Culture and History 2) US Army Corps of Engineers 3) USDA - Natural Resources Section 4) WV DNR - Wildlife Resources Section 5) US Dept. of the Interior - Fish and Wildlife Service
Comments received from these agencies (See Appendix F) will be incorporated into a Environmental Assessment Report to be provided at a later date.
Negative environmental impacts of the projects will be minimal. Unavoidable adverse impacts such as erosion and sedimentation will be minimized through the use of silt fences, straw bales, and other available technologies. Disturbed areas will be graded, seeded and mulched as soon as practical after construction. Dust, mud and other conditions will be minimized by regularly sweeping and damping roadways. Noise pollution will be controlled as much as possible through the proper operation and maintenance of equipment and scheduling of work.
The 100 year flood elevation of the small streams within the project area were not readily available. No flood sensitive components such as tanks or booster stations will be located in the 100 year flood plain. Components such as water lines, fire hydrants and meters which may be located within the flood plain will be of such a design that potential flood damage will be minimal if not non-existent.
15 VII. PROJECT SUMMARY
The proposed Upper Little Harts Creek Water Extension Project will provide potable water service to approximately 97 potential customers (290 persons) in the Lincoln County communities of Little Harts Creek, Harvey Fork, Mudlick Branch, Gartin Fork and Laurel Fork. The project will connect to an 8-inch main (Atenville Water Project) along County Route 68 and extend along County Routes 68 and 68/1 in easterly and southerly directions, respectively. Branch lines will be extended along County Routes 68/2, 68/3 and 68/4.
The proposed project consists of the construction of approximately 30,100 linear feet of 8-inch and smaller diameter water main, one 90 gallons per minute booster station, one 95,000 gallons storage tank, 20 fire hydrants, valves, meters and other related appurtenances. Water will be provided by the District's Northern Regional Water Treatment Plant. Location, Project and System Maps are included as Appendix C.
Construction and project costs are estimated at $2,32 1,000 and $2,710,000, respectively. Anticipated funding consists of a Small Cities Block Grant of $1,500,000, Infrastructure Fund Grant of $4 10,000 and an Infrastructure Fund Loan of $800,000 at zero (0) percent interest for 40 years. Copies of funding commitment letters are included in Appendix G.
16 UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
April, 2009
17 UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER PROJECT PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
ITEM AMOUNT Estimated Construction Cost $2,110,000.00 Construction Contingency ( 10% ) $21 1,000.00 Engineering-Design $70,000.00 Engineering-Construction $25,000.00 Engineering-Special $29,000.00 Construction Inspection $80,000.00 Project Legal Services $5,000.00 PSC Legal Services $5,000.00 Property Acquistion Legal $15,000.00 Administration $55,000.00 Sites & Other Lands $20,000.00 Permits $18,000.00 Bond Counsel Services $25,000.00 Accounting Services $6,000.00 Project Contingency ( 10% ) $36,000.00 Total Estimated Project Cost $2,710,000.00
ANTIC I PATE D FINANCING
SOURCE AMOUNT Small Cities Block Grant (SCBG) $1,500,000.00 WV Infrastructure Fund (IJDC) Grant $41 0,000.00 WV Infrastructure Fund (IJDC) Loan $800,000.00 Total Estimated Funding $2,710,000.00
18 PROJECTED 0 & M EXPENSE
PLANT CHEMICALS:
During the year ended June 30,2006, the Northern Regional Treatment Plant produced approximately 412,242,000 gallons of water. During this same period, $68,910 worth of chemicals were used. This equates to a chemical cost of approximately $0.17 per thousand gallons of water treated.
It is estimated that the Northern Regional Treatment Plant will initially produce an additional 4,4 16,000 gallons of water per year to meet the demand of the Upper Little Harts Creek Water System. At a cost of $0.17 per thousand gallons, the plant chemical cost will be:
Plant Chemical Cost = $0.17/MGal. x 4,4 16.0 MGal. = $750.72/year say $750/Year I
TREATMENT PLANT ELECTRICITY:
During the year ended June 30,2006, the Northern Regional Treatment Plant produced approximately 4 12,242,000 gallons of water. During the same period, electric bills totaled $107,496. This equates to an electrical cost of approximately $0.26 per thousand gallons of water treated.
It has been estimated that approximately 4,416,000 additional gallons of water per year will be produced to serve the Upper Little Harts Creek Water System. At a cost of $0.26 per thousand gallons, the plant electrical cost will be:
Plant Electrical Cost = $0.26/MGal. x 4,416.0 MGal. ! = $1,148.16/year say $1,15O/year
BOOSTER STATION ELECTRICITY:
The proposed Upper Little Harts Creek Booster Station will pump all of the water used by the Upper Little Harts Creek Water System. Assuming an average monthly usage of 4,000 gallons per customer and using 15 percent unaccounted for water for leaks, fire fighting, line flushing, etc., the booster station will pump an average of 368,000 gallons of water per month (80 cust. x 4,000 gal./mo./cust. x 1.15). The proposed booster station will have a rated capacity of 90 gallons per minute and the motors will be 15 hp. The additional electricity expense for the Upper Little Harts Creek Booster Station is calculated as follows:
At 90 gpm, the pump will run: 368,000 gal./mo./90 gpm/60 min./hr.=68.1 hr./mo. @ 15 hp, that's 68.1 x 15 = 1,021.5 hp-hours/mo. Converting to kilowatt hours: 1,021.5 hp-hourdmo. x 0.7457 = 761.7 kwh/mo. @ $0.10 kwh/nio.: 761.7 x 0.10 = $76.17/mo. Or $76.17/mo. x 12 = $914.04/year, say $920/year
STORAGE TANK ELECTRICITY:
The Upper Little Harts Creek Water Project includes the construction of one (1) water storage tank. An electrical service will be provided at the tank location to power the telemetry system (minimal usage). The District currently has several such electrical services at its various tanks, repeaters, etc., and the monthly electricity cost averages approximately $10.00 per month per service. At $1 0.00 per month per service the annual cost will be:
Storage Tank Electricity Cost = 1 site x $lO.OO/mo./site x 12 mo./yr. = $ 120/vear
MAINTENANCE MATERIALS:
This item includes replacement meter boxes and lids, valve box risers, repair clamps, etc. Because this is a new system, it is anticipated that maintenance material expense will be minimal. Additionally, all major components of the system will be under warranty for the first year of operation. Maintenance material expense is estimated as follows:
Estimated at $1OO/mo. x 12 mo./yr = $l,200/vear
OUALITY CONTROL/TESTING:
This item includes testing expense for daily chlorine residual tests and monthly bacteriological tests. Quality control/testing expense is estimated as follows:
Testing: Chlorine Residual = Minimal Bacteriological = 12 testdyr. @ $1 5/test = $180.00/Yr.
TRANSPORTATION EXPENSE:
Estimate 20 mile round trip & 7 tripdweek 20 miledtrip x 7 tripdwk. x 52 wks./yr. x $0.40/mile = $2,912/yr., say $2,91O/yr.
BILLING/MAILING MATERIALS & POSTAGE:
One billing card will be printed and mailed to each of the 80 initial new customers each month. It is estimated that approximately 16 (20 percent) delinquent notices will be mailed per month. One Consumer Confidence Report will be mailed to each customer per year. It is anticipated that one additional public relations notice will be mass mailed per year. The total billing/mailing materials and postage expense will be as follows:
Billing 80 billdmo. x $0.40/bill x 12 mo./yr. = $ 384.00 Deliq. Notice 16 letterdmo. x $0.70/letter x 12 mo./yr. = 134.40 Con. Conf. Report 80 reportdyr. x $2.00/report = 160.00 PR Mailing 80 noticedyr. x $1 .OO/notice - 80.00 Total $ 758.40 Say $760/vear
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE MATERIALS:
This item includes mainly consumable items such as pens, pencils, paper, staples, tape and other items used by the office staff to service the additional customer accounts resulting from this project.
Estimated at $2 1Ohear
MEMBERSHIPS & DUES:
WVPSC Assessment $0.35/$100 revenues x $3 1,83O/yr. = $1 11.40/yr. WV Rural Water Association Dues 80 customers x $O.lS/customer = $12.OO/yr.
MISS UTILITY OF WV Dues $1.25 per call & assume 5 calls per month $1.25/call x 5 calls/mo. x 12 mo./yr. = $75/yr.
Total = $1 11.40 + $12.00 + $75.00 = $198.40/yr. say $200/year
SUMMARY:
Plant Chemicals $ 750.00 Treatment Plant Electricity 1, 150.00 Booster Station Electricity 920.00 Storage Tank Electricity 120.00 Maintenance Materials 1,200.00 Quality ControUTesting 180.00 Transportation Expense 2:910.00 Billing/Mailing Materials & Postage 760.00 Misc. Office Materials 210.00 Memberships & Dues 200.00 Total Annual O&M Expense $ 8,400.00 TOTAL REVENUE REOUIREMENT
Total revenue requirement for the system will be the total of the estimated O&M Expense plus the Bond Payment/Coverage. Coverage is expected to be 15 percent.
It is estimated that the District's annual O&M expenses will increase by $1 8,500 as a result of the construction of this project.
It is anticipated that the District will have to borrow $800,000 at zero (0) percent interest for 40 years to complete project financing. Using a coverage requirement of 15 percent of annual bond payments, the Bond Payment/Coverage requirement is calculated as follows:
Bond Payment/Coverage = $800,000/40 x 1.15 - $23,00O/year Total Revenue Requirement = 0 & M Expense + Bond Payment/Coverage - $8,400 + $23,000 - $3 1,40O/year
It is estimated that approximately 80 percent of the 97 potential customers will initially connect to the system (See Customer Listing in Appendix H). It is estimated that the average monthly bill for these 80 customers will be approximately $33.16, this equates to a total increase in annual revenues of approximately $31,830 (80 x $33.16 x 12).
Completion of the proposed project described herein will result in an increase in operation and maintenance expense of approximately $8,400 per year. Debt Service and coverage is expected to be approximately $23,000 per year. Additional revenues resulting from the system have been estimated at $3 1,830 per year. This equates to an annual surplus as a result of this project of approximately $430. It is therefore concluded that this project is feasible and self sustaining.
The District's last general rate increase was in 2003. The Public Service Commission of West Virginia (PSC) approved the rates by Final Order dated June 30,2003 in Case No. 02-1399- PWD-42T. The effective date of the increase was July 15, 2003. The District has since increased rates through Case No. 03-2015-PWD-30B which were PSC approved by Final Order dated December 28,2004. The effective date for the new rates was December 28,2004. Under the District's current tariff, the minimum bill is $16.93 per month for 2,000 gallons usage. The average monthly bill for 4,000 gallons usage is $33.16. A copy of the tariff is included in Appendix I.
Design of the system is complete. The District has begun to obtain the necessary construction permits for the project (See Permit Summary/Status Form in Appendix J). It is anticipated that the project period will be approximately 20 months. A project schedule detailing the critical project steps is included as Appendix K.
It will be necessary to acquire two (2) parcels of land for this project for the tank and booster station. It will be necessary to obtain approximately 16 rights-of-way. The number of required rights-of-way has been minimized by locating waterlines on WV Division of Highways right-of-way whenever possible. Acquisition is underway (See Appendix L).
The public health benefits to be derived from the project include those associated with improved quality of drinking water. The bulk of the wells in the project area are Contaminated with high levels of iron, manganese, etc. The construction of the system will eliminate the potentially harmful ingestion of these contaminates. Additionally, many individual home lots within the project area are small which increases the probability that private wells could be contaminated by septic systems. This project will provide an alternate source of water so that individual wells can be abandoned; thereby, significantly reducing this potential hazard.
I APPENDIX A
LOGAN COUNTY PSD I CREATION ORDER I ..
!EZiL'S, Tne.. ,zxnicF~jlity of West Lo,-- 3s consented to be includs!d withi? the bo-mdcy of the Low Colmw Public Serdce District a resolutf~o, of it= el% ca?ulcil, which resolution is ztSdied hereto and iacoqorateb as a pz-? herzof. . -mrsuvlt to said motim the=@vzs an June 5, 1975, at
LO:S3 2.3. o'clock :e:$ Vlrania heid in accordance with Chzgter 16, bsticle l3A, SectirJn 2 of :he Vest Viz&nisr Code with the propr notices of Fablication urd all gersons :esiAin,r in sz on or 5a7-ing m.3- in$arsst ir~2rqcrty in sai2 gropos.rri tisi.ric'J !ad a opprt.z?itr to be hearc! for and agzhst it3 crcztion, at :&ic)l haaLizg he C~tqtyCoraissior! detemined tkt the creation of swh pblic sm*-ce istrict lsas feasible and recessed the hearing mtil 32 30th da,y of Jme, 775, at 10:03 a.m. a'clock for further cozsideration. ?EZZ!, on the 30th day of Jms, 1075, the ,xblic heazing on the creation of the Lopi County Bblic Service Di-trict vas recanvzned iL?d the ~CI+JComission of bgm Corulty has detcmimd that the creation of a zou5jwride Tiblic aervize district vithin L3~y-n Coslnty :{odd be conducive - ______-_?_- _I______---- ~--~~---I ------L------*-' - -- -1 to the preservation of public health, comfort and convenience of said area. A1 1 of the muni cf pal 1ty. of Chapmanvi 1t e; A1 7 of the municipal i ty of Man; ' A11 of the Buffalo Creek Public Service Dfstrict of the Triadelphia Magisterial Dfstrict of the County of Logan, West VirgMa, more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the Sprfng Mountain Lookout Tower, said point bdng in the Boone-Logan * -. County line; thence, southeasterly with the meanders of said Boone-Logan County line 4.25 mites, more or tps, to a pojnt in the comnon.corner to Boone-Wyoming and Logan County; thence, e . . southwesterly with the meanders of 'the Wyoming-Logan County line and with the top of Buffalo Mountain 10.65 miles, more or less, to a point in the 37* - 45' meridfan line; thence, due 1 , I -2- It is ,further ORDSXED 11 herotofore created by Ordsr 3: th County Court of LOW County on the 5th I I of ?cbrzar;r, 1??3, the Cgra-3a.Lrock-Val’alloJ Vim 3blic SeTice District created by Ozder 3f th.; Cog3nty Court of Lo,= Cm,n’;y, on the 5th day of I 1973, an3 +he Gugara ?ublic Se-Tics District heretofore crested by Order of 1j County Court of h,cm Cou~tyen ths 19th dzy of Oc$ober, 1973: shall be and : hergby are consolidztod with ad incoqozzted into the Logan County Public Semic3 Xstrict . me establiskent ad creation of the Z>am Caunty -5lbli.c Semce District, ezbrzchg the tezitorjr above described, shdl be effective U~OP tl receipt adfilicg of a zesolution in groper form by the City ofit€tchell Heights, vherzby the puniciprlity of N.I:tchell 3ei.&%sconsents to be includec within the boundtry Qf the grasosed public Done EZrnE.: . .. I -. . .. . ’RESOLUTION I WHEREAS, on the 5th day of May, 1975, the County Commission of Logan iI i County will consider proposing the creatfon of a public service dfstrict I within Logan County, to be known as the Logan County Public Service District, ! 1 and to fncl ude the fo7.. 1owing territory: All of Logan County; . .- WHEREAS, the ‘City Councfl of West Logan believes that the proposed ublic service distrfct will be conducfve.to the preservation of the public ealth, comfort and convenience of the municipality of West Logan and a71 f Logan County; :I THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the munfcfpality of Mest Logan does 1 :reby consent to be included within the boundaries of the proposed pub’lic I wice district. I Dated this. /+”A day of 9 .. t ,' RESOLUTION \/HEREAS, on the /” day of 2. ’.- .:* e:’. d*.-.;:r t 1975, the County Commission of Logan County will consider proposing the creation of a public service district within Logan County, to be known as the Logan County Fbblic Service District, and to include the following territory: All of Logan county; I Excluding, however : . All of the municipality of Logan; All of the municipality of Chapmanville ; All of the municipality of Man; and I All of the Buffalo Creek Public Service District of the’T&delphia Magisterial District of the County of Logan, West Virginia. I WHEREAS, the municipality of Mitchell Heights cannot be included within the boundaries of this proposed public service district without its consent; WHEREAS, the City Council of Mitchell Heights believes ,hat the proposed public service district will be conductive to the preservation of the public health, comfort and convenience of the municipality of Mitchell Heights and all of Logan County; 3.- ^..--*il ___-______=m,-BE;ICT__RESOLVEI) that the municipality of *------y-aa*---- _- dl Heights does hereby consent to be included within . .- the boundaries of the proposed public service district, subject to and upon the follo;.ling conditions: 1. All construction within the Town of Mitchell Heights shall comply with the ordinances of the tovm, including those Hereafter enacted. I 2. The location of and plans for all facilities in the \ Town must have the prior written approval of the Town of Mitchell I Heights. Dated this 3 day of.~R&H~E? 1975. Upon motion this meeting is continued and adjourned to the next Regular Session to be held on Friday, September 5, 1975, at 1O:OO o’cIock Ik.. M. ...... _. . -...... - .. ~ . . . , ,...... APPENDIX B LOGAN COUNTY PSD EXPANSION ORDERS IN THE COUNTY COMMISSION OF LOGAN COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA RE: ENLARGEMENT OF LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 5th day of October, 1994, pursuant to Chapter 16, Article 13A, Section 2, of the West Virginia Code the County Commission of Logan County, West Virginia, upon its own motion entered on order proposing the enlargement of Logan County Public Service District into the Southern portion of Lincoln County, West Virginia. WHEREAS, the County Commission of Lincoln County, West Virginia has consented to have this area included within the boundary of the Logan County Public Service District by resolution, which is attached and incorporated as part hereof. WHEREAS, pursuant to said motion there was on October 7, 1994, at 6:OO p.m. o'clock there was a public hearing at Room 104 of the Logan County Courthouse, Logan, West Virginia held in accordance with Chapter 16, Article 13A, Section 2 of the West Virginia Code with the proper notices of publication and all persons residing in or on or having any interest in property in said proposed additional territory had an opportunity to be heard for and against its enlargement at which hearing the County Commission of Logan County, West Virginia determined that the enlargement of Logan County Public Service District to include the southern portion of Lincoln County, West Virginia was feasible and would be conducive to the preservation fo public health, comfort and con- venience of said area. Therefore, upon proper motion and second the County Commission of Logan County, West Virginia does hereby ORDER the enlargement of and does enlarge the Logan County Public Service District under the provisions of Chapter 16, Article 13A, Section 2 of the West Virginia Code to have all of the powers enumerated in said Chapter and Article. Said public service district shall continue to be known as Logan C0unt.y Public Service District It is further ORDERED that the area or portion of Lincoln County to be included in the Logan County Public Service District is as follows: Beginning at a point at the intersection of the Lincoln, Wayne and Mingo County lines, thence, following said Lincoln and Mingo County lir,e in a northeasternly direction approximately 34, 850 feet, more or less to its intersection with the Logan County line; thence, following said Lincoln and Logan County line in a northeasternly direction approximately 84,450 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the Boone County line; thence, following said Lincoln and Boone County line in a northeasternly direction approximately 8,970 feet, more or less, to a point located on the eastern extreme of said county line; thence, following said Lincoln and Boone County line in a northwesternly direction approximately 39,600 feet, more or less, to a point having a latitude of N. 38O 05' located on said county line; thence, following a straight line due west approximately 33,790 feet, more or less, to a point having a latitude of N. 38O 05' and a longitude of W. 82O 05'; thence, following a straight line in a south- westernly direction approximately 23,760 feet, more or less, to a point on West Virginia Route 10 at the top of Fourteen Mile mountain; thence, following a straight line in a southwesternly direction approximately 13,200 feet, more or less, to a point on the Lincoln and Wayne County line located on said line approximatley 5,000 feet north of its intersection with County Route 68; thence, following said Lincoln and Wayne County line in a southeasternly direction approximately 51,750 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. The enlargement of Logan County Public Service District as ordered herein shall be effective on the date of the Final Order issued by the Public Service Commission of West Virginia. ENTERED this 7 &, day of &d enl L ev , 1994. LOGAN COUNTY COUSION ...... , . .. - .- ., ."..~... . - ...... ~. .- ...... -. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, on the 5th day of October, 1994, the County Commission of Logan County, West Virginia adopted an order proposing the enlargement of Logan County Public Service District to include the following territory in Lincoln County as further identified on the attached map: Beginning at a point at the intersection of the Lincoln, Wayne and Mingo County lines, thence, following said Lincoln and Mingo County line in a northeasternly direction approximately 34,850 feet, more or less to its intersection with the Logan County line; thence, following said Lincoln and Logan County line in a northeasternly direction approximately 84,450 feet, more or less to its intersection with the Boone County line; thence following said Lincoln and Boone County line in a northeasternly direction approximately 8,970 feet, more or less, to a point located on the eastern extreme of said county line; thence, following said Lincoln and Boone County line in a northwesternly direction approximately 39,600 feet, more or less, to a point having a latitude of N. 38O 05' located on said county line; thence, following a straight line due west approximatley 33, 790 feet, more or less, to a point having a latitude of N.38O 05' and a longitude of W. 82O 05'; thence, following a straight line in a southwesternly direction approximately 23,760 feet, more or less, to a point on West Virginia Route 10 at the top of Fourteen Mile Mountain; thence, following a straight line in a southwesternly direction approximately 13,200 feet, more or less, to a point on the Lincoln and Wayne County line located on said line approximately 5,000 feet north of its intersection with County Route 68; thence, following said Lincoln and Wayne County line in a southeasternly direction app- roximately 51,750 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. WHEREAS, previously on the 6th day of October, 1994, the County Commission of Lincoln County, West Virginia, adopted an order dissolving the Ranger-Harts Public Service District. THEREFORE, the area of Lincoln County to be included in Logan County Public Service District is not included within the boundaries of any existing Public Service District; WHEREAS, the County Commission of Lincoln County, West Virginia believes that the inclusion of the afore-discribed territory in the Logan County Pilblic Service District will be conducive to the preservation of the public health, comfort and convenience of the residents of this area of Lincoln County; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Commission of Lincoln County, West Virginia, does hereby consent to the enlargement of Logan County Public Service District to include the above described territory. Dated this 6 th day of nc{db er , 1994. /,- President , tincoln County Commission , - . . , , . .. ,. I_ ...... - . ~. .. ~. - - ..-...... . .- PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON Entered : April 13, 1995 ZASE NO. 94-0889-PWD-PC LINCOLN COUNTY COMMISSION, iamlin, Lincoln County. Petition to dissolve Ranger-Harts Public Service District. ZASE NO. 94-1065-PWD-PC LOGAN COUNTY COMMISSION, Logan, Logan County. Petition to expand boundaries of Logan County Public Service District into Harts Creek area of Lincoln County. RECOMMENDED DECISION , PUBLIC SCRVICC COMMISSION O? WC8T VIROINIA CWARLCITON matter and Case No. 94-1065-PWD-PC be consolidated and heard together because- of the related issues they involve. Case No. 94-1065-PWD-PC On November 9, 1994, the Logan County Commission filed a petition requesting the Commission's approval.for enlarging the boundaries of the Logan County PSD into the southern portion of Lincoln County generally referred to as the Harts Creek area. Included in the documentation was an Order 5, 1994 Order of the Logan County Commission proposing the enlarge- ment and an October 6, 1994 Order of the Lincoln County Commission ac- cepting the proposed enlargement. On December 20, 1994, Mr. Robertson filed the Initial Joint Staff Memorandum, with attached memorandum from Mr. Knurek. Commission Staff stated that it was reviewing this matter, and, upon completion of its review, would make its final recommendation. Finally, Mr. Robertson recommended consolidation of this matter with Case No. 94-0899-PWD-PC. On January 11, 1995, Mr. Robertson filed an Initial and Final Joint Staff Memorandum, with attached memorandum from Mr. Knurek. Mr. Robertson stated that it is the view of Commission Staff that the Logan County Commission has substantially complied with the requirements of Code S16-13A-2 and that hearing should be held in Logan County or in both Logan and Lincoln Counties. Case Nos, 94-0889-PWD-PC and 94-1065-PWD-PC On December 27, 1994, the Commission issued an Order Consolidating snd Referring, consolidating the two cases and referring them to the Division of Administrative Law Judges (ALJ Division) for decision on or before June 7, 1995. On January 18, 1995, the undersigned ALJ issued a Procedural Order scheduling these matters for hearing on March 7, 1995, at 10:30 a.m. in the County Commissioners' Courtroom, Lincoln County Courthouse, Hamlin, dest Virginia, and at 1:00 p.m. in the County Commissioners' Courtroom, Logan County Courthouse, Logan, West Virginia. It was also ordered that the Lincoln County Commission cause to be published for public legal qotice a copy of an attached Notice of Hearing once in a newspaper duly zualified by the Secretary of State, published and of general circulation in Lincoln County, West Virginia, and that the Logan County Commission Zause to be published for public legal notice a copy of the attached iotice once in a newspaper duly qualified by the Secretary of State, ?ublished and of general circulation in Logan County, West Virginia. ?ublication was required to be not more than twenty days and not less than Eive days prior to the date of hearing, with the date of publication :ounting as the first day. On January 20, 1995, the undersigned ALJ issued a Procedural Order ;hat, due to a typographical error on the notice attached to the Janu- iry 18, 1994, order, substituted a corrected Notice of Hearing. The 'etitioners were advised that the publication requirements of the prior irder applied to the publication of the revised notice. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VlROlNlA C WAR LLITON -2- On March 6, 1995, Rick Roberts, Managing Engineer for the Logan IICounty Public Service District, filed affidavits of Publication estab- lishing that the revised Notice of Hearing was published on February 22, 1995, in The Lincoln Journal and The Loqan Banner. Hearing was held as scheduled. Appearing at hearing in Hamlin, Lincoln County, was Mr. Robertson, . representing Commission Staff, and making appearances for the petitioners were Mr. Roberts and members of the Lincoln County Commission, Doug Waldron, Buster Stowers, and Paul Duncan, President. Entered into the record were the affidavits of publication in The Lincoln Journal (Petitioner No. 1) and The Logan Banner (Petitioner No. 2) and Commission Staff's Initial and Final Joint Staff Memorandum in Case No. 94-0889-PWD-PC (Staff No. 1). Appearing at hearing in Logan, Logan County, were Mr. Robertson and Mr. Roberts, and entered into the record was the Commission Staff's Initial and Final Joint Staff Memorandum in Case No. 94-1065-PWD-PC (Staff No. 2). No protestant appeared at either segment of hearing. (Tr. 5-6). On March 21, 1994, the transcript of hearing was filed. II FINDINGS OF FACT 1. On October 10, 1994, the Lincoln County Commission filed a petition requesting approval by the Commission to dissolve the Ranger-Harts Public Service District, with an attached October 6, 1994 order of the Lincoln County Commission authorizing dissolution of the Ranger-Harts Public Service District. (See petition). 2. On November 9, 1994, the Logan County Commission filed a peti- tion requesting the approval by the Commission to enlarge the boundaries of the Logan County Public Service District into the southern portion of Lincoln County generally referred to as the Harts Creek area, with an attached October 5, 1994 order of the Logan County Commission proposing the enlargement and an October 6, 1994 order of the Lincoln County Com- mission accepting the proposed enlargement. (See petition). 3. The cases were consolidated by the Commission because the area of expansion of the Logan County Public Service District would consist of most of the area presently within the boundaries of the Ranger-Harts Public Service District, plus some area outside the service area of any utility. (See Commission order of December 27, 1994; Staff Exhibit 1). ~ 4. Commission Staff recommended approval of the petitions. (See Staff Exhibits 1 and 2). 5. Notice of hearing was published on February 22, 1995, in The Lincoln Journal and The Logan Banner and no protestant to either petition appeared at hearing held on March 7, 1995 in Hamlin, Lincoln County, and Logan, Logan County. (See Tr. 5-6). PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VlROlNlA CHARLI*TON -3- CONCLUSION OF LAW - Since a public hearing was held in Lincoln and Logan Counties on the petition filed by the Lincoln County Commission to dissolve the Ranger-Harts Public Service District and on the petition filed by the Logan county Commission to expand the boundaries of the Logan County Public Service District into the Harts Creek area of Lincoln County and no one appeared at hearing to make protest to the petitions, after proper publication was made, and since Commission Staff has recommended granting said petitions, it is determined that said petitions should be granted as unprotested cases. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the petitions of the Lincoln County Commission and the Logan County Commission filed, respectively, on.Octo- ber 10, 1994, and November 9, 1994, be, and they hereby are, granted, and the October 5 and 6, 1994 orders of said County Commissions authorizing the dissolution of the Ranger-Harts Public Service District and the expansion of the boundaries of the Logan County Public Service District into the Harts Creek area of Lincoln County be, and they hereby are, approved. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that these matters be removed from the Commis- sion's docket of open cases. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Executive Secretary serve a copy of this order upon the Commission by hand delivery, and upon all parties of record by United States Certified Mail, return receipt requested. Leave is hereby granted to the parties to file written exceptions supported by a brief with the Executive Secretary of the Commission within fifteen (15) days of the date this order is mailed. If exceptions are filed, the parties filing exceptions shall certify to the Executive Secretary that all parties of record have been served said exceptions. If no exceptions are so filed this order shall become the order of the Commission, without further action or order, five (5) days following the expiration of the aforesaid fifteen (15) day time period, unless it is ordered stayed or postponed by the Commission. Any party may request waiver of the right to file exceptions to an Administrative Law Judge's Order by filing an appropriate petition in writing with the Secretary. No such waiver will be effective until approved by order of the Commission, nor shall any such waiver operate to make any Administrative Law Judge's Order or Decision the order of the Commission sooner than five (5) days a ver by the Commission. SA:mal ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ PUOLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIROINIA CHARLCITON -4- APPENDIX C LOCATION, PROJECT AND SYSTEM MAPS Scale: 1" = 12 miles LOCATION MAP TTPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT 'r;lr.*t Scale: 1" = 1 mile PROJECT MAP rppER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT Scale: 1" = 2,000' SYSTEM MAP UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT SITE PLAN NOKRIERN REGIONAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT 302-A300 403-A400 \ 16'WxBLx6" THICK CON APRON W/6x6-10/10 WWF NORTHERN REGIONAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT APPENDIX E WELL TESTING RESULTS BOARD MEMBERS: Jurw.s R. J Jim E. Boggs Region I1 PDC P.O. Box 939 Huntington, WV 25712 Re: Upper Little Harts Creek Water Extension Project Dear Mr. Boggs: The Lincoln County Commission recently submitted an application for a Small Cities Block Grant for the Upper Little Harts Creek Water Extension Project. To document the existing water conditions within the project area, the County Commission authorized Logan County Public Service District to survey the potential customers within the project area and perform certain testing on their wells. Of the 105 potential customers, 80 were interviewed and had their well water tested. The results of the interviews/testing are summarized on the attached Well Survey/Testing Summary. A map is also attached which identifies each of the interviewhesting sites. Based upon the survey/testing, the following observations were noted: 1) 13.9 percent (1 1 of 79) of those interviewed indicated that they experienced water quantity problems. 83.8 percent (67 of 80) of those interviewed indicated that their water looked bad. 3) 62.3 percent (48 of 77) of those interviewed indicated that their water smelled bad. 4) 56.3 percent (40 of 71) of those interviewed indicated that their water corrodes pipes and fixtures. 5) 85.7 percent (66 of 77) of those interviewed indicated that their water stains sinks, toilets, etc. Jim Boggs May 24,2005 Page 2 of2 6) 35.4 percent (28 of 79) of the wells tested were positive for total coliforms. 7) 10.1 percent (8 of 79) of the wells tested were positive for E-coli. This indicates the presence of fecal material in the wells. 8) 55.0 percent (44 of 80) of those interviewed indicated that they utilize a home treatment unit to attempt to improve water quality. 9) 92.5 percent (74 of 80) of those interviewed indicated that they would connect if public water service was available. In the District's opinion, it is clear that the need exists for a new public water system I in the Upper Little Harts Creek area of Lincoln County. Additionally, public support for the project is overwhelming, Please forward this information to the West Virginia Development Office as a supplement to the previously submitted Small Cities Block Grant Application. Tf you have any questions, please let us know. Managing Engineer LOGAN COUNTY PSD CRR:mjg Attachments: as stated , ...... - .. ~. LINCOLN COUNTY COMMISSIQN/LQGAN COUNTY PSD UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER PROJECT , ... ~~ . ,. .. . ~ .. . .- .-, .,. . .. _... -. . . ..~.. .. . _. .. ~ .. APPENDIX F ENVl RONM ENTAL LETTERS April 24, 2009 Mr. Rick Roberts, PE Project Manager E.L. Robinson 5088 Washington Street West Charleston, WV 253 13 RE: Upper Little Harts Creek Water Project FR#: 05-1313-LC-1 Dear Mr. Roberts: WEST VIRGINIA We have reviewed the additional information for the above referenced project to determine its DIVISION OF effects to cultural resources. As required by Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, CULTURE & HISTORY ~ as amended, and its implementing regulations, 36 CFR 800: "Protection of Historic Properties," The Cultural Center we submit our comments. 1900 Kanawha Blvd., E. Charleston, WV Architectural Resources: 25305-0300 According to the information submitted the booster station will be approximately 8' tall, 17' long and 12' wide, the storage tank will be approximately 20' in diameter and 33' feet tall. Both the Phone 304.558.0220 booster station and tank will be enclosed in a 10' chain link fence for security reasons. It is our Fax 304.558.2779 understanding that the cut stone wing walls identified on Sheet 8 will not be effected. The TDD 304.558.3562 proposal is to bore under the cut stone wing walls in order to install the water line in this location. www. wvcu Iture, o rg EEOIAA Employer In our opinion, the proposed project will have no effect on any architectural or structural resources listed in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. No further consultation regarding architectural or structural resources is required. Archaeological Resources: Thank you for submitting the DVD of the prqject area. It was very informative. A search of office site files located no known archaeologicalsites within the proposed project area. Our records do indicate that site 46Lcl19, a prehistoric habitation site with a historic component, is located within several hundred feet of proposed line locations. However, according to submitted information, a majority of the proposed construction activities will be confined within previously disturbed areas andor existing road rights-of-way, where in our opinion, it is unlikely that there are any intact archaeological deposits. In our opinion, there are no archaeological sites located within the proposed project area that are eligible for or listed in the National Register of Historic Places. If, however, cultural materials are encountered during construction, all activity within the discovery area shall cease and our office shall be contacted immediately. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service. rfvou have questions regarding our comments or the Section 106process, please contact Ginger Willford, Structural Historian, or Carolyn Oflce at (304) 558-0240. ' Beputy State Historic Preservation Officer SMPIGWICMK DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HUNTINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 602 EIGHTH STREET HUNTINGTON, WEST VIRGINIA 26702~2070 Operations and Readiness Division Regulatory Branch Harvey Fork of Little Harts Creek- 2009-165-GUY Upper Little Harts Creek Water System Extension Logan County PSD P.O.Box 506 Logan, WV 2560 1 Dear Sir: I refer to an application dated January 27,2009 in which you requested a Department of the Army permit to discharge dredged and/or fill material into waters of the United States (U.S.) in conjunction with a water line extension project. The proposed project would include impacts to Little Harts Creek, Harvey Fork, Laurel Fork, Mudlick Branch and Garlin Fork near the town of Atenville, Lincoln County, West Virginia. The Corps of Engineers (Corps) authority to regulate waters ofthe United States is based on the definitions and limits ofjurisdiction contained in 33 CFR 328 and 33 CFR 329. Section 404 of the Clean Water Act requires that a Department of the Army (DA) permit be obtained prior to placing dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, including wetlands. Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 requires that a DA permit be obtained for any work in, on, over or under a navigable water, To the extent that the Corps has jurisdiction over the discharge of dredged or fill material associated with the pipeline installation, the proposed activity meets the criteria for Nationwide Permit # 12 under the March 19,2007, Federal Register, Issuance of Nationwide Permits (72 FR 11092) provided you comply with all terms and conditions of the enclosed material. Please be aware this nationwide permit authorization does not obviate the requirement to obtain state or local assent'required by law for the activity. If you have any questions concerning the above, please contact Amy Ferguson at (304) 399-571 0. Sincerely, Regulatory Team Leader SoutWTransportation Section Enclosures Copies Furnished: (see next page) -2- Copies Furnished: Mr. Lyle Bennett WV Department of Environmental Protection 601 57' Street Charleston, West Virginia 25304 Mr. Roger Anderson WV Division of Natural Resources P,0. Box 67 Elkins, West Virginia 26241 E.L, Robinson ATTN: Ray Tilley 207 Brookshire Lane Beckley, WV 25801 United States Department of Agriculture mm Natural Resources Conservation 8150 B Court Ave. Service Hanilin, WV 25523 824-3530 September 29, 2005 Rick Roberts, P.E. Managing Engineer Logan Public Service District P.O. Box 506 Logan, WV 25601 Dear Mr. Roberts: You will find enclosed the soils information that you requested for the Upper Little Harts Creek Water Project in Lincoln County. The information was compiled by Rick Jones, Soil Scientist at our Huntington Service Center. If you have any questions Rick can be reached at 304-697-6033. He has included a soils legend, soils map and map unit descriptions for your use. &w&* Alan Boone District Conservationist Hamlin Field Office Enclosures: soils legend, soils map, and map unit descriptions Cc: Rick Jones, Soil Scientist, Huntington The Natural Resources Conservation Service provides leadership in a partnership effort to help people conserve, maintain, and improve our natural resources and environment. An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer 09122105 Lincoln County Soil Survey Identification Legend Uplands Publication Field Svmbol Svmbol(s) Map unit name acreage in county 255775 LgC 27C (33C) Latham-Gilpin complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes 1397 LgD 27D Latham-Gilpin complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes 2182 LiD 29D Lily sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, very stony 862 LiE 29E Lily sandy loam, 25 to 35 percent slopes, very stony 659 ShF 29F Sharpcrest-Hazleton complex, 35 to 75 percent slopes, extremely bouldery 13817 GpC 31C Gilpin-Upshur complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes 837 GpD 31D Gilpin-Upshur complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes 8899 GpE 31E Gilpin-Upshur complex, 25 to 35 percent slopes 21309 GpF 31F Gilpin-Upshur complex, 35 to 65 percent slopes 35059 GrE 32E Gilpin-Wharton silt loams, 15 to 35 percent slopes 3899 G1F 32F (33F) Gilpin silt loam, 35 to 65 percent slopes, very stony 12903 GiD 33D Gilpin silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 1039 GiE 33E Gilpin silt loam, 25 to 35 percent slopes 592 GmE 34E Gilpin-Matewan complex, 25 to 35 percent slopes, very stony 5836 RmF 34F Rayne-Matewan complex, 35 to 65 percent slopes, very stony 66376 MlE 37E Matewan-Latham complex, 25 to 35 percent slopes, very stony 55 1 HmF 38F Highsplint-Matewan-Cloverlick association, very steep, extremely stony 77330 BsF 39F Berks-Shelocta association, very steep, extremely stony 960 D1D 40D Dormont-Latham complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes 167 DIE 40E Dormont-Latham complex, 25 to 35 percent slopes 152 MpF 61F Matewan-Pineville-Guyandotte association, very steep, extremely stony 949 Alluvium Terraces Publication Field Svmbol Svmbol(s) MaD unit name acreage in county 2335 CoA 16A Cotaco loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes 83 COB 16B (1OB) Cotaco loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes 285 CUB 124B (1 80) Cotaco-Urban land complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes 54 CUC 124C Cotaco-Urban land complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes 36 uk 21 (180) Urban land-Kanawha complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes, protected 369 KaA 21A Kanawha silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, protected 545 KaB 21B (28B) Kanawha silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, protected 445 AgB 24B (9B) Allegheny loam, bedrock substratum, 3 to 8 percent slopes 14 1 AgC 24C (9C) Allegheny loam, bedrock substratum, 8 to 15 percent slopes 303 Gu 47 Guyan silt loam, rarely flooded 74 Low Floodplains Publication Field Symbol Swnbol(s) Map unit name acreage in county 10933 Ne 2 Nelse silt loam, 3 to 25 percent slopes, frequently flooded 737 SeA 3A Sensabaugh loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded 518 SfB 3B Sensabaugh loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, rarely flooded 2310 Gs 4 Grigsby fine sandy loam, frequently flooded 2296 Gt 04 Grigsby loam, occasionally flooded 446 Or 5 (120) Orrville loam, occasionally flooded 878 y g 6 Yeager fine sandy loam, frequently flooded 87 Ms 7 Moshannon silt loam, occasionally flooded 499 Lo 8 (121) Lobdell loam, occasionally flooded 887 09/22/05 Lincoln County Soil Survey Identification Legend Low Floodplains Publication Field Symbol SynboKs) Mau unit name acreage in countv Ch 12 (13) Chagrin loam, frequently flooded 1601 HY 14 (1 1) Holly loam, occasionally flooded 132 Mr 15 Middlebury loam, frequently flooded 44 1 Sm 18 Skidmore gravelly sandy loam, frequently flooded 50 sc 122 Senecaville silt loam, occasionally flooded 51 Colluvium Publication Field Svmbol SvmboKs) Mau unit name acreage in county 6434 BeD 42D Beech loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 124 I BeE 42E Beech loam, 25 to 35 percent slopes 506 PvE 43E Pineville channery loam, 25 to 35 percent slopes, extremely stony 44 8 SkC 44C (44B) Shelocta-Beech complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes 660 S1D 44D Shelocta-Beech complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, very stony 549 S1E 44E Shelocta-Beech complex, 25 to 35 percent slopes, very stony 653 VaC 45c Vandalia silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes 204 VnD 45D Vandalia silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, very stony 1044 VnE 45E Vandalia silt loam, 25 to 35 percent slopes, very stony 2222 HUE 46E Highsplint-Urban land complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes, very stony 24 Mine soils Publication Field Svmbol Svmbol(s) Mat, unit name acreage in county 2802 KfB 71B Kaymine and Fiveblock soils, 0 to 8 percent slopes, extremely stony 606 KfF 71F Kaymine and Fiveblock soils, 3 5 to 65 percent slopes, extremely stony 1921 KmF 74F Kaymine-Cedarcreek-Matewan complex, very steep, extremely stony 134 CeF 75F Cedarcreek-Rock outcrop complex, very steep, extremely stony 141 Miscellaneous areas Publication Field I Svmbol Svmbol(s) Map unit name acreape in county 272 1 W W Water 1498 Ud M Udorthents, smoothed 867 uu 18 1 (1 SO) Udorthents-Urban land complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes, rarely flooded 328 uw Ua Udorthents, earthen dam 28 I New 10'0 GPM I BoosterI Station New 100,000 :gallon ;Tank New 6” Main / / APR/27/2009/MON 11 : 25 AM WV DNR FAX No, 304 637 0250 P, 002 DIVISIONOF NATURALRESOURCES Wildlife Resources Sectlon Operations Center P.O. BOX67 Elklns, West Vlrglnla 26241-3235 Joe Manchin Ill Telephone (304) 637-0245 Frank Jezlora Governor Fax (304)637-0250 Director September 13,2005 Mr. Rick Roberts Logan Co~mtyPublic Service District P.O. Box 506 Logan,WV 25601 Dear Mr. Roberts: We have reviewed our files for information on rare, threatened and endangered (RTE) species and sensitive habitats for the areas of the proposed water projects for Upper Little Harts Creek and Holden in Logan Cow'cy, WV, We have no known records of my RTE species or sensitive habitats within the project areas. The Wildlife Resources Section knows ofno suveys that have been conducted jn Wlese areas fox rare species or rare species habitat. Consequently, this response is based on information currently available and should not be considered a comprehmsive mvey of the areas under review, Enclosed please find an invoice. Thank YOU for YOU inquiry, and should you have any questions please feel. fxee to contact me at the above ilumber, extension 2048. , * Environmental Resources Specialist Wildlife Diversity Pxogram enclosure United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE West Virginia Field Office 694 Beverly Pike Elkins, West Virginia 2624 1 March 13,2006 Mr. Rick Roberts, P.E. Managing Engineer Logan County Public Service District P.O. Box 506 Logan, WV 25601 Re: Upper Little Harts Creek Water Project Dear Mr. Roberts: This responds to your information request of September 2,2005 regarding the proposed Upper Little Harts Creek Water Project in Logan County, West Virginia. These comments are provided pursuant to the Endangered Species Act (87 Stat. 884, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Only one federally listed species could occur in the project area, the endangered Indiana bat, (Myotis sodalis). The federally listed endangered Indiana bat may occur in the project area and could conceivably be adversely affected by the project proposal. The Indiana bat may use the project area for foraging and roosting between April 1 and November 15. Indiana bat summer foraging habitats are generally defined as riparian, bottomland, or upland forest, and old fields or pastures with scattered trees. Roosting/maternity habitat consists primarily of live or dead hardwood tree species which have exfoliating bark that provides space for bats to roost between the bark and the bole of the tree. Tree cavities, crevices, splits, or hollow portions of tree boles and limbs also provide roost sites. The US. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has determined the number of acres of suitable foraging and roosting habitat on the West Virginia landscape available to each Indiana bat, versus the total acreage of forest. On that basis, we have determined that small projects, outside of a five-mile radius of a hibernaculum or known capture site, affecting 17 acres or less of suitable forested habitat, will have a very small chance of resulting in direct or indirect take of the species, and therefore these effects are considered discountable. If less than 17 acres of Indiana bat maternity habitat will be impacted by this project then no further consultation under the Endangered Species Act is required. If more than 17 acres will be disturbed, then you should contact this office to discuss project options. Should project plans Mr. Rick Roberts, P.E. 2 November 18,2005 change, or if additional information on the Indiana bat becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Ms. Barbara Douglas of my staff at (304) 636-6586, or at the letterhead address. Field Supervisor APPENDIX G FUNDING COMMITMENT LETTERS -1 Office of the Govei or TeIephone: (304) 558-2000 State Capitol Toll Free; 1-888-438-2731 1900 Kanawha Boi :ward. East FAX: (304) 342-7025 ' Charleston, WV25 :)5 www.wif gov. org January 14,2009 The Honc 'able Charles McCann I Presiden Lincoln C mty Commission Post Offit : Box 497 Hamlin, VIl isst Virginia 25523 Dear Cor ! missioner McCann: Thank yo' for your application to the Small Cities Block Grant program. Your reqriist has been approved in the amount of $1,300,000. These funds will enable you to I extend Wi I ,er service to the Upper tittle Harts Creek area of Lincoln County. I In order i:) effectively use the limited dollars available, I hereby commit $700,000 from our fiscal ye21 2008 allocation that will immediately be available to you. The remaining $600,000 necessar, to complete the project will be evaluated and committed in a future year allocation based on lour ability to proceed forward with this project. I encourage you to expedite this project and reac its completion as quickly as possible with this funding straiegy in mind. The West Virsi da Development Office reserves the right to withdraw these funds if your project does not prow ii on schedule. Please cc itact Mr. Michael Browning of the West Virginia Development Office at (304)558-2234, extension ii2007, to complete the necessary contract in order to proceed with your project. I I am plea:. i!d to assist with these improvements for the citizens of Lincoln County. Governor JM:mbm &ice of the Govemo Telephone: (304) 558-2000 State Capitol Toll Free: 1-888-438-2731 j900 Kanawha Boule rrd, East FAX: (304) 342-7025 :harleston. MV2530'1 www.wvgov.org February 1, 2008 The Honors I de Charles S. McCann President Lincoln COLI I@ Commission Post Off ice iox 497 Hamlin, WE 11: Virginia 25523 Dear Comn rssioner McCann: , Thank you ',Iv your application to the Small Cities Block Grant Program. Your requeill:has been approved in the amount of $200,000 for a Design and Administration Grant. These func: ; will enable you to complete the engineering design and required administrative services fo, Che logan Public Service District to extend public water service to the Upper Little Harts Creel In order to lfectively utilize the limited dollars available, the West Virginia Development Office has launched i I new program to assist communities with the engineering and administrative component, of selected projects. This grant does not secure funding for the balance of the request in Icwapplication. The designed project must be resubmitted and will be competitively reviewed a! ti considered for funding based on an amended application, availability of funds, and 1 other reque its pending at that time. The West Virginia Development Office reserves the right to I withdraw th ~sefunds if your project does not proceed on schedule. Please con rict Angela White Negley of the West Virginia Development Office, at (304) 558-2234, I to complete Ihe necessary contract in order to proceed with your project. 1 am pleasci i to assist with this project for the citizens of Lincoln County. I ~ , Joe anch ii Ill Governor JM:anb lh APPENDIX H CUSTOMER LISTING 202 Workman Rodney Rt. 2 Box I I9 Harts WV 25524 855-9585 yes yes no yes 3 203 Dalton lean Rt 2 Box 120 Harts WV 25524 855-3611 yes yes no yes 1 brick house on riyht with aluminuni car port 204 Dalton Henle Rt. 2 Box l20A Harts WV 25524 855-7295 yes yes no yes 3 2 tone gray wth red triniidriveway 205 not home 206 Guyan FWB Church Gail Vance, Clerk Rt. 2 Box SI Harts WV 25524 855-9316 yes yes no yes church Little Hans Creek Road 207 Paulsen Charles Rt. 2 Box 122 Harts WV 25524 855-4468 yes yes no yes 2 gray white shutters on risht 208 Wans Randall L R. Taunya Rt. 2 Box l2lA Harts WV 25524 855-5810 yes yes no yes 4 209 \Vans Randall Lee P 0 Box 41 6 Harts WV 25524 yes yes no yes 4 210 Vance William Rt. 2 BOX 124 Harts wv 25524 85s-sm yes yes no yes 4 Little Harts Road -21 1 no yes no spent lots of money on well does not wish to be served no longer 212 Maynard Mose J Rt. 2 Box 12SA Harts WV 25.524 855-6052 yes yes no yes 3 -213 Bursess Leonard Rt. 2 Box 126 Harts WV 25524 555-7911 no yes did not vish to obtain serviceI2 li2 niiles up Little Harts 214 Christian Quincy RR 2 Box 158A Harts WV 25524 855-5212 yes yes no yes 3 Linle Harts Creek Road 215 Adkins Ora Rt 2 Box 158 Harts WV 25524 855-7032 yes yes no yes 2 216 Toney Benjamin 140 Harvey Fork Hans WV 25524 855-4005 yes yes no yes 3 217 Ramey Gwen 150 Harvey Fork Harts WV 25524 855-3770 yes yes no yes 1 218 Maynard Orlantha 160 Harvey Fork Harts WV 25524 855-3258 yes yes no yes 3 301 Norman Wanda Rt 2 Box I58 Harts WV 25524 855-7032 yes yes no yes 2 3 02 Norman David S: Lamanda Rt 2 Box I58 Harts WV 25524 855-8229 yes yes no yes 4 303 Tomblin Lenie J Rt. 2 Box 130 Harts WV 25524 855-9412 yes yes no yes 2 304 Adkins Kay & Mary Rt 2Boxl31 Harts WV 25524 855-8891 yes yes no yes 2 305 Dingess Johnnie Rt. 2 Box 133 Harts WV 25?24 85.5-9419 yes yes no yes 3 -- c_- - - - D - UpperLzle Harts Creek Water Project Customer List User Decline -Plan z& Proaertv Agreement Statement Wants to be Persons in Man No.. _Sheet List Name ~ -First Name ~ Address-.- ~ . W.L . Strte-. _Code .J?!EE.& . .Owner . , &!m! . .. . Siened-. -. serve!.. ~ House.. . . . - - . -Remarks .. 306 Dingess April Rt 2 Box 133 Harts WV 25524 855-9419 yes yes no yes 3 307 -Dlnqess ~~~~--~~~~~~ Gregory A. Rt. 2 Box 134 Harts WV 25524 855-7649 yes yes no yes 3 308 Brumfield Opie Rt 2 Box 133A Harts WV 25524 yes yes no yes 1 309 wlll mail 310 Thomas Jeffrey P.0 Box366 Harts WV 25524 855-3798 yes no no yes 2 Rt. 2 Little Hans Road 311 Thomac Charles Rt 2 Box 137 Hans WV 25524 855-4423 yes yes no yes 2 312 Ramey Rodney B Kathlene Rt 2 Box 136 Harts WV 25.524 855-1003 yes yes IlO yes 2 Mud Lick Road 313 Estep Dorothy Rt 2 Box 138 Harts W 25524 855-3697 yes yes no yes 2 314 Ramey Nancy Rt. 2 Box 139 Hans WV 25524 855-7194 yes yes no yes 4 gray maroon shutters 315 Ramey Clarence Rt 2 BOY139A Harts WV 2.5524 855-7194 yes yes no yes 4 white single wde redlatice 855-8513 or 855 316 Wdry John Jr B Mary RR 2 Box 140 Harts WV 25524 3531 yes yes no yes 2 Mud Lick Road ~ ~ 855-9419 3 miles on Little Harts Creek Road. yellow trailer on 11111 across ciilvert 317 Toney, Jr Earl Rt 2 Box I57G Harts WV 25524 (mother-in-law) yes yes no yes 4 on the left 318 Dingess G. Odell Rt. 2 Box 132 Harts WV 25524 855-3875 yes yes no yes 4 3 miles up Little Harts CreekRoad on right 319 Adkins Tatum B Kevin Rt 2 Box 141 Harts WV 25524 855-7181 Odell Dingess yes no yes 4 3 miles up Little Harts Creek Road on nght White one stov home 320 Ramey Charles B Lina RR 2 Box 156A Harts WV 25524 855-4198 yes yes no yes 4 321 Ramey Judith K RR2Box156 Harts WV 25524 855-4854 yes yes no yes 322 Horton Willard A Rt 2 Box 155A Harts WV 25524 895-1539 yes yes no yes 3 3 112 mile up Little Harts Creek 40 I Raniey Silford B Linda Rt 2 Box 145 Harts WV 25524 855-3100 yes yes no yes 2 Multi colored brick on lofts creek 402 Wiley Billy R. Rt. 2 Box 146 Harts WV 25524 855-4323 yes yes no yes 1 white house wlgarden on right before Manns Knob 3 to 5 miles Upper Little Harts Creek I st lhouse on left pasr Maims Knob 403 Vance Mlchael& Josir Rt. 2 Box I548 Harts WV 25524 855-8747 yes yes no yes 1 (Grey & burgundy house) 404 Fleming Kathleen Rt. 2 Box I48 Harts WV 25524 855-4604 ses yes no yes 1 36 Fleming Drive 405 Fleming Bob Rt 2 Box I50 Hans WV 25524 855-4604 yes yes no yes 2 36 Fleming Drive 406 Kirk Fred RI 2 Box 149 HWtS WV 25524 855-1491 yes yes no yes 3 >oginC ---,D - __ -_ _. -. _- Upper Lillle Harts Creek Water Piojecf Customer List User Decline -Plan Proaerte Agreement Statement Wants to be Persons in Remarks Man No. - .Last Name First Name -- ~ Address -- Q& -. .~ . _Code. phone No. Owner-. ~ . Signed . . Signed ~~- served- -. house- -~ .. . .-. 180Harvey Fork 501 Mmns David 8: Odessa Road Hans WV 25524 855-4400 yes yes no yes 2 Harvey Fork Road on Little Hans 190 Harvey Fork 502 Manns Ernest 8: Robin Road Hans WV 25524 855-4347 yes yes no yes 3 Harvey Fork Road on Little Hans 200 Harvey Fork 503 blanns Jimniy Road Harts WV 25524 855-3179 yes yes no yes 4 601 Browning Geneva KR 2 Box 160 Harts WV 25524 855-9822 yes no no yes 1 didnot receive user agmt 2 miles west from Harts Primary School on Rt IO. turn left across 602 Lucas James A ‘t Janet A RR 2 Box 161 Hans WV 25524 855-7871 yes yes no yes 4 concrete bridge. gray house on hill on right on Francis Creek Rd. GO3 Lucas Herhen Rt 2 Box 164 Harts WV 25524 855-5295 yes yes no yes 2 tan trailer. red shutters 604 LUCaS Dwayne& Vikki P.O. Boa 36 Hans WV 25524 855-9344 yes yes no yes 4 4th houseigray & blue douhlemdeion left across Francis Creek hridse 605 Lucas Terq W Rt 2Box 165 Harts WV 25524 855-8607 yes yes no yes 2 gray/white trailer on hill on left 606 Lucas Harold E Rt. 2 Box 165 Harts WV 25524 855-9667 yes yes no yes 2 white houseblack shutters on hill 607 Maynard Ezra D. RR 2 Box 166 Harts WV 25524 8.5s-1555 yes yes no yes 3 hluehhite houseon hill on right 608 will mail 609 not home 610 Walls Russell Rt 2 Box 276 Hans WV ___-25524 855-5803 Ronald Manns yes no yes 3 Laurel Fork, Hans, WV -~~~ -~~ ~ GI I Manns, Sr Donald G Rt. 2 Box 170 Harts WV 25524 855-9814 yes yes no yes 2 612 Frye Royce RR 2 Box I72 Harts WV 25524 855-7152 yes yes no 1 2 tone brown trailer on bill x creek on right GI3 Gillum Rebecca Rt 2 Box 173 Harts WV 25524 855-2381 EzraMaynard yes no yes 4 light hlueblack shutters white trim on right 701 Adkins Helen & Jason Rt. 2 Box 175 Harts WV 25524 855-9885 yes yes no yes 5 702 Manns L Craig RR2Bon I77 Hans WV 25524 855-5111 yes yes no yes 3 2 tone brown on right x creek and trailer 703 Manns Sessie RR 2 Box 177 Hans WV 25524 8554442 yes yes no yes 1 2 tone brow on right x creek 1st traler 704 Thompson Millard Rt 2 Box I78 Harts WV 25524 855-7653 yes Yes no yes 2 white house on right at base of mountain 705 Manns Sandra K Rt. 2 Box I79 Hans WV 25524 855-3742 yes yes no yes 1 did not sign agmt sent user apt 706 08125108 Manns Paul Rt. 2 Box 180 Harts WV 25524 855-3828 yes yes no yes 4 Logan 1 - - __ SD - _- UpGrxttle Harts Creek Water PrGeTt- Customer List User Decline -Plan Pronertv Agreement Statement Wants to be Persons in Mia No. Sheet Last Name First Name Address - . m__&&- Q& PhoneNo. Owner Signed - Siened _-served House Remarks not owners will deliver to landlord R. 707 mail 708 Frye Teddy M Rt 2 Box ISIAA Hans WV 25524 yes yes no yes 2 Rt 2 Laurel Fork 709 Tomblin Vonnie Rt 2Bo~185 Harts WV 25524 855-7316 yec yes no yes 1 white house black shutters on 11111 so I Holtrclaw Willilam J Rt 2 Bo\ 187 Harts WV 25524 855-2374 yes yes no yes 2 one mile up Francis Creel, Rd on the left SO2 hlanns Georzia Ann P 0 Box 538 Harts WV 25524 855-5967 no no no no 4 just received questionnairelno declinnlionldoes not want to be served 803 Barker LOIS RR2Box186 Harts WV 25524 855-2049 yes yes no 1 SO4 Fillinger JoAnn Rt 2 Box 182 Harts WV 25524 855-7316 yes yes no yes 2 805 Toppins Jeff Rt 2 Box I90 Harts WV 2'524 855-4420 yes yes no yes 2 806 Toppins GiWgOry Rt 2 Box 191 Harts WV 25524 855-7918 yes yes no yes 1 SO7 Ritchie Mark Rt 2Box 191A Harts W 25524 855-8623 yes yes no yes 4 SO8 will mail 809 not home 810 Dalton Ears!e Rt 2 Box 194 Harts WV 25524 855-4414 yes yes no yes 2 brick house on hill on right SI1 Queen Melissa Rt 2 Box I95 Harts WV 25524 855-3541 yes yes no yes 4 peach & geen 2 story on left Ian house w/ blue shutters on Laurel Fork Mtn on Francis Branch 812 Riffe Phillip Rt 2 BOX198 Hans WV 25524 855-3874 yes yes no ye5 5 Roadllast house on left hefore you top niounimn disabled will mal 813 wth SI2 814 Wiley Charles Rt 2 BOYl97A Harts WV 25524 855-5395 yes yes no yes 5 SI 5 ill mail 901 Lambert Mike 50 Rock bdge Rd Harts WV 25524 855 5056 yes yes no yes 3 log house on hill on risht 3rd from last 902 Keyser Garnett Rt 2 BOX203 HRRS WV 25524 855-5821 yes yes no yes 5 white house on hill 2nd from last Juanita& Leslie 003 Williamson Oscar Rt 2 Box 204 Harts WV 25524 855-7402 LeeKeyser yes no yes 2 2nd house after hill on right ran 2 driveway? - _- - _. - ____Logan (---SD _- Ueaer.. Little Harts Creek Water Proicct Customer List User Decline -Plan & Prooertv Agreement Statement Wants to be Persons in Map NO. Sheet Last Name First Name Address -- CJ& _Q& PhoneNo. Owner- served .- House- Remarks - .- -_Siened IOOOA Rice Norma J. 56 Rock bdge Rd. Harts WV 25524 855-9705 yes yes no yes 4 first house on riglit white small beside crmetary Rock RidSe Rd 1001 Bryant Timothy B Bobbi 97 Rockridge Rd. Harts WV 25524 855-4935 yes no no yes 4 did not receive user agntt 1002 Gillum Nancy IO6Rock Ridge Rd. Harts WV 25524 855-5369 Jimmy Gilluni yes no yes I 1003 Gillurn Jimmy I I I Rock Ridge Rd Harts WV 25524 855-3831 yes yes no yes 4 last house in RockRidge Rd Gray with porch & halfgreen roof 1003A Fugate Corinna 105 Rock RidgeRd Harts WV 25524 855-3831 yes yes no yes 4 gold/white trailer next to last Adrian talked to heriKevin said she told him she would have the docunients in her mailbox. On the questionnaire in sectioii A she wants to he sewed but on section B she doesn't. She signed the declination hi 1101 Ramey Molly E Rt. 2 Box 157 Harts WV 25524 855-4643 yes no yes no didn't have a remon tievin said she was very old I102 I Ramey 1 Lisa I Rf 2Box 1568 I Harts I WV I 25524 I 835-4446 I yes no no yes 2 left with I IO3 daughterhot home left with l103B daushterlnot home I IO4 not home 1105 Christian Lindsay Rt 2 Box 1 57AA Hans WV 25524 855-2842 yes yes no yes 4 tanbroull shutters on lefts creek 1106 Kirk Taullya M Rt. 2 Box 157D Harts WV 25524 855-7841 yes yes no yes 4 white trailer on right niaroon shutters mth metal carport 1 IO7 Raniey DavidG __~ Rt 2Box157AA ~ Harts WV 25524 855-2961 yes yes no yes 4 last house on hill cream two story I APPENDIX I EXlSTlNG/PROPOSED TARIFF I i P.S.C. W. Va. No. 11 Canceling P.S.C. W. \'a. No. 10 -. it- 8 12 ,I >' j LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT, a public utility OF Logan, West Virginia RATES, RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR F'URMSHING WATER in the Counties of Logan, Lincoln, Mingo, Boone and Wyoming, West Virginia Filed with THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION of WEST VIRGINIA Issued December 29,2004 Effective for service rendered on or after December 28,2004 or as otherwise provided herein Issued by authority of an Order of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia in Case No. 03-2015-PWD-30B final December 28? 2003 or as otherwise prokided herein. Issued by LOGAN COLTSTY YYBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT, a public utilit_)* / LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT (Water) P.S.C. W.VA. Tariff No. 11 ! Original Sheet No. 1 RULES AND REGULATIONS I. Rules and Regulations for the Government of Water Utilities, adopted by the Public Service Commission of West Virginia, and now in effect, and all amendments thereto and modifications thereof hereafter made by said Commission. LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SER\.?CE DISTRICT (Water) P.S.C. W.VA. Tariff No. 11 ; Original Sheet No. 2 WA4TERSCHEDULE NO. 1 APPLICABILITY Water rates applicable in all areas served by Logan County Public Service District AVAILABILITY Available for residential, commercial, governmental, industrial and resale service RATES First 2,000 gallons used per month $8 .47 per 1,000 gallons Next 58,000 gallons used per month $8 .11 per 1,000 gallons Next 240,000 gallons used per month $5 -98 per 1,000 gallons All Over 300,000 gallons used per month $3 .13 per 1,000 gallons MINIMUM CHARGE No minimum bill will be rendered for less than $16.93 per month, based on meter size: METER SIZE MINIMUM CHARGE 5/8 inchmeter $ 16.93 per month 3/4 inchmeter $ 25.40 per month 1 inch meter $ 42.34 per month 1 - 1/4 inchmeter $ 61.82 per month 1 - 1/2 inchmeter $ 84.68 per month 2 inch meter $ 135.52 per month 3 inch meter $ 254.06 per month 4 inch meter $ 423.44 per month 6 inch meter $ 848.47 per month 8 inch meter $1,358.85 per month UNMETEREDRJNMEASURED RATE In the event the water supply (residential) is unmetered or otherwise unmeasurable bj- the District, the unmetered rate of $37.19 per month shall be charged. (Based 011 4,500 gallons used per month) LOGAN COUKTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT (Water) P.S.C. W.VA. Tariff No. 11 Original Sheet No. 3 WATER SCHEDULE NO. 1 (Continued) DELAYED PAYMENT PENALTY The above schedule is net. On all accounts not paid in full when due, ten percent (10% will be added to the net current amount unpaid. This delayed payment penalty is not interest and is to be collected only once for each bill where it is appropriate. TAP FEE The following charges are to be made whenever the utility installs a new tap to serve an applicant. A tap fee of $100.00 will be charged to customers applying for service before construction is completed adjacent to the customer's premises in connection with a certificate proceeding before the Commission. This pre-construction tap fee will be invalid after the completion of construction adjacent to the applicant's premises that is associated with a certificate proceeding. A tap fee of $250.00 will be charged to customers applying for service outside of a certificate proceeding before the Commission for each new tap to the system. RECONNECTION $25.00 To be used whenever the supply of water is turned off for violations of rules, non- payment of bills or fiaudulent use of water. RETURNED CHECK CHARGE A service charge equal to the actual bank fee assessed to the District or a maximum of $15.00 will be imposed upon any customer whose check for payment of charges is returned by their bank due 10 insufficient funds. LEAK ADJUSTMENTS $0.97 per 1,000 gallons of water is to be used when a bill reflects unusual water consumption which can be attributed to eligible leakage on customer's side of the meter. This rate shall be applied to all such unusual consumption above the customer's historical a\ erage usage. APPENDIX J PERMIT SUMMARY/STATUS UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER PROJECT PERMIT SU MMARY /STATUS Permit APency Date Submitted Date Received Permit No. WV Bureau for Public Health November 21,2008 December 10, 2008 18,190 WV Division of Highways January 26,2009 Pending Pending WV Public Land Corporation January 27,2009 February 10,2009 P-09-V/22-0170 WV DEP (Stormwater) May 6,2009 Pending Pending WV Culture & History March 19,2009 April 24, 2009 05-1313-LC-1 US Army Corps of Engineers January 27,2009 March 23, 2009 2009-165-GUY PWSID: WV3302364 tate of West FFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES WASHINGTON and CAPITOL STREETS 1 DAVIS SQUARE, SUITE 200 CHARLESTON, WV 25301 Telephone 304-558-298 1 PERMIT (Water) PROJECT: Upper Little Harts Creek Water Line Extension PERMIT NO.: 18,190 LOCATION: near Atenville COUNTY: Lincoln DATE: 12- 10-2008 THIS IS TO CERTIFY that after reviewing plans, specifications, application forms, and other essential information that Logan County Public Service District P. 0. Box 506 Logan, West Virginia 25601 is hereby granted approval to: install approximately 26,270 LF of 6" and 3,387 LF of 2" water line; one (1) 90 GPM duplex booster station with VFD and booster chlorination; one (1) 95,000 gallon water storage tank; and all necessary valves, controls and appurtenances. Facilities are to serve 98 customers along Upper Little Harts Creek in Lincoln County. NOTE: This permit is contingent upon: 1) All new water line and the storage tank being disinfected, flushed and bacteriologically tested, prior to use; and 2) The new 95,000 gallon water storage tank being enclosed by a minimum six (6) feet high fence with a locking gate. The Environmental Engineering Division of the St. Albans District Office (304) 722-0611, is to be notified when construction begins. ; Validity of this permit is contingent upon conformity with plans, specifications, application forms, and other information submitted to the West Virginia Bureau for Public Health. FOR THE DIRECTOR // /B.J Wifiiam S, Herold, fr.yt?E., Aisistant Manager Infrastructure and Capacitydevelopment Environmental Engineering Division WSH:cls pc: E. L. Robinson Engineering James W. Ellars, P.E., PSC-Engineering Division Amy Swam, PSC Lincoln County Health Department OEHS-EED St. Albans District Office EW-100 Office Use only 03/08/2005 Date Received i1’2.1- ut Date Approved 12.1 1-u!: Approved by Permit Number i3/q9 WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES Bureau for Public Health Office of Environmental Health Services Capitol and Washington Streets 1 Davis Square, Suite 200 Charleston, West Virginia 2530 1- 1798 Telephone: 304-55 8-2981 Fax: 304-558-0691 PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, ALTER, OR RENOVATE (Please Prepare in 4 Copies) APPLICANT I ogan County PSD DATE November 18.20 STREET ORPO BOX P.0. Box 506 TELEPHONE 946-2641 CITY COUNTY Wn ZIP 3.5601 ENGINEERINGFIRM F I RnbbnFnoeerina w STREET ORPOBOX 707 Rroowire I ane TELEPHONE 757-7473 CITY Reckley STATE WV ZIP 75801 -~ LOCATION OF PLANT LOCATION OF SOURCE WATER 0 0 I II Latitude ‘I Latitude --- 0 0 Longitude ---I It Longitude ---I I1 IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 64, SERIES 3, PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY REGULATIONS OF THE WEST VIRGINIA DMSION OF HEALTH, WE HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT, ALTER, OR RENOVATE AS FOLLOWS: NOTE: A $300 application fee must accompany a permit application ($1 50 application fee for a water well permit application). Make check or money order payable to “West VirginiaDepartment ofHealth andHuman Resources”. Cash not accepted. Permit applications which include both water and sewer systems require only a single $300 fee. EG-5 03/08/2005 WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES Bureau for Public Health Office of Environmental Health Services Capitol and Washington Streets 1 Davis Square, Suite 200 Charleston, West Virginia 25301-1798 TelePhone: 304-558-2981 Fax: 304-558-0691 WATER SYSTEM DESIGN INFORMATION AND DATA SHEET Complete all portions of the Design Data Sheet applicable to the project. Omission of required information will result in the application being denied. When both sewer system and water system are to be constructed, Design Data Sheets for both sewage and water be completed and attached to the application. Applicant Loaan Co unty PSD Project Location UDPer Little Harts Creek county Lin co I n Number of customers 98 or Estimated population or population equivalent served Number of home sites 98 Number of mobile home sites Estimated peak flow 100 gpm Minimum consumer pressure (statichesidual) 42 20 psi Source of Supply: LCPSD-Atenville PSD Water System (name of utility) Municipal Public Service District d Private Well (specify) Pressure at connection to public supply (staticlresidual) 78 50 psi Capacity of well, if applicable gpm Type of system Gravity J Hydropneumatic Other (spec*) Length of water lines of each size 26,270' Of 6" and 3,387' Of 2" YES 2 Details of well construction attached J- Fire hydrants to be installed (hydraulic calculations be included) J- Storage tank required Size oftank 95,000 gallons Elevation of top and bottom of storage tank 1155 1197 J- Booster station required Size of station 90 gpm J Pressure reducing station required L Details of water treatment equipment (if applicable) J Chlorination Contact time minutes DIVISIONOF NATURAL RESOURCES Capitol Complex, Building 3, Room 643 1900 Kanawha Boulevard, East Charleston WV 25305-0661 Telephone (304)558-3225 Fax (304)558-3680 Joe Manchin 111 TDD (304)558-1 439 Frank Jezioro Governor TDD 1-800-354-6087 Director February 10,2009 Division of Natural Resources LICENSE AND RIGHT OF ENTRY ' Re: P-09-Vl22-0170 Logan County Public Service District C/o E.L. Robinson Engineering Attention: Ray Tilley 207 Brookshire Lane - Beckley, WV 25801- Dear Mr. Tilley: The Division of Natural Resources hereby grants to you for a term of 25 years, from the date hereof, a License and Right of Entry to construct, replace, cover, repair, operate, maintain, use and remove four-inch (4") and six-inch (6") water pipelines at seven (7) different locations along Little Harts Creek, Harvey Fork, Laurel Fork, Mudlick Branch and Garlin Fork, Harts Creek District, Lincoln County, West Virginia, as shown located and highlighted in red on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A. This License and Right of Entry is subject to the following terms and conditions: 7. No in stream work during the fish-spawning season (April l-June 30). 2. The pipeline must be buried at least three-feet (3') 3. Any stream bed disturbance should be restricted to the immediate area. In stream use of equipment should be kept to a minimum. 4. All shore areas disturbed by this operation must be reshaped, seeded and mulched immediately upon completion of work. The prompt establishment of vegetative cover will reduce future damage from high water levels. 5. Green concrete must not be put in the stream (highly toxic to aquatic life). 6. Amount of stream side vegetation disturbed should be kept to a minimum. ' 7. Best management practices should be followed; measures such as hay bales must be used to reduce downstream siltation. Logan County Public Service District P-09-V/22-0170 Page 2 February IO, 2009 8. Any plastic pipeline less than four-inch (4") in diameter shall be encased in a metal conduit. 9. The State's issuance of this Right-of-Entry does not provide for the applicant to work outside the requested boundaries nor does the State assume any liability for the applicant's/landowner's construction activities. By accepting this Right-of- Entry, the applicantllandowner assumes liability for any/all damages caused by this activity to both upstream and downstream landowners. 10. Work should be completed as quickly as possible during low flows in designated work areas only. 11. A404 Permit may be required from The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. You may contact them at 304-399-521 1 or 412-395-7152. Guidelines of Best Management Practices for Sediment and Erosion Control as outlined by the Section of Water Resources, Division of Environmental Protection must be followed. Copies of those guidelines are available from the Section of Water Resources, Telephone No. (304) 926-0440. The issuance of this License and Right of Entry by the Division of Natural Resources does not preclude the necessity to obtain a permit from the Corps of Engineers or any other state or federal permits which may be required by law, nor does this License and Right of Entry negate the need to comply with the West Virginia Water Pollution Control Act and/or the State Environmental Quality Board's administrative regulations, applicant is also responsible for determining if the proposed activity is located within an identified flood plain and it is the applicant's responsibility for contacting the local governmental agency in charge of that program and obtaining a flood plain development permit for it. This License and Right of Entry does not grant any rights or privileges, or permission to enter upon or to cross the property of any other person, nor is permission granted to remove any material that lies upon the property of any other persons. Work should be completed in as brief a period as possible and within one year from the date of this letter. In the event you fail or refuse to comply with any of the terms or conditions herein, this License and Right of Entry will be canceled and considered null and void and the Division will reject further applications. There is no fee for this Right of Entry. Sincerely, upervisor Office of Land ahd Streams JTS:ah pc: DNR Fish Biologist Mr. Mike Zeto, Environmental Enforcement DNR Conservation Officers April 24, 2009 Mr. Rick Roberts, PE Project Manager E.L. Robinson 5088 Washington Street West Charleston, WV 253 13 RE: Upper Little Harts Creek Water Project FR#: 05- 13 13-LC-1 Dear Mr. Roberts: WEST VIRGINIA We have reviewed the additional information for the above referenced project to determine its DIVISION OF effects to cultural resources. As required by Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, CULTURE & HISTORY as amended, and its implementing regulations, 36 CFR 800: "Protection of Historic Properties," The Cultural Center we submit our comments. 1900 Kanawha Blvd., E. Charleston, WV Architectural Resources: 25305-0300 According to the information submitted the booster station will be approximately 8' tall, 17' long and 12' wide, the storage tank will be approximately 20' in diameter-and 33' feettall. Both the Phone 304.558.0220 booster station and tank will be enclosed in a 10' chain link fence for security reasons. It is our Fax 304.558.2779 understanding that the cut stone wing walls identified on Sheet 8 will not be effected. The I TDD 304.558.3562 www.wvcuIture.org proposal is to bore under the cut stone wing walls in order to install the water line in this location EEOiAA Employer In our opinion, the proposed project will have no effect on any architectural or structural resources listed in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. No hrther I consultation regarding architectural or structural resources is required. Archaeological Resources: Thank you for submitting the DVD of the project area. It was very informative. A search of office site files located no known archaeological sites within the proposed project area. Our records do indicate that site 46Lc 1 19, a prehistoric habitation site with a historic component, is located within several hundred feet of proposed line locations. However, according to submitted information, a majority of the proposed construction activities will be confined within previously disturbed areas andor existing road rights-of-way, where in our opinion, it is unlikely that there are any intact archaeological deposits. In our opinion, there are no archaeological sites located within the proposed project area that are eligible for or listed in the National Register of Historic Places. If, however, cultural materials are encountered during construction, all activity within the discovery area shall cease and our office shall be contacted immediately. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service. rfvou have questions regarding our comments or the Section I Ob process, please contact Ginger Willford, Structural Historian, or Carolyn wation Office at (304) 558-0240. SMPIG WICMK DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HUNTINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 602 EIGHTH STREET HUNTINGTON, WEST VlRGlNfA 26701.2070 Operations and Readiness Division Regulatory Branch Harvey Fork of Little Harts Creek- 2009-165-GUY Upper Little Harts Creek Water System Extension Logan County PSD P.O.Box 506 Logan, WV 25601 Dear Sir: I refer to an application dated January 27,2009 in which you requested a Department of the Army permit to discharge dredged and/or fill material into waters of the United States (US.) in conjunction with a water line extension project, The proposed project would include impacts to Little Harts Creek, Harvey Fork, Laurel Fork, Mudlick Branch and Oarlin Fork near the town of Atenville, Lincoln County, West Virginia, The Corps of Engineers (Corps) authority to regulate waters of the United States is based on the definitions and limits of jurisdiction contained in 33 CFR 328 and 33 CFR 329, Section 404 of the Clean Water Act requires that a Department of the Army (DA) permit be obtained prior to placing dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, including wetlands. Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 requires that a DA permit be obtained for any work in, on, over or under a navigable water. To the extent that the Corps has jurisdiction over the discharge of dredged or fill material associated with the pipeline installation, the proposed activity meets the criteria for Nationwide Permit # I2 under the March 19,2007, Federal Register, Issuance of Nationwide Permits (72 FR 11092) provided you comply with all terms and conditions of the enclosed material, Please be aware this nationwide permit authorization does not obviate the requirement to obtain state or local assent'required by law for the activity. If you have any questions concerning the above, please contact Amy Ferguson at (304) 399-571 0. Sincerely, Regulatory Team Leader SouWTransportation Section Enclosures Copies Furnished: (see next page) -2- Copies Furnished : Mr. Lyle Bennett WV Department of Environmental Protection 601 57' Street Charleston, West Virginia 25304 Mr. Roger Anderson WV Division of Natural Resources P, 0. Box 67 Elkins, West Virginia 26241 E.L. Robinson ATTN: Ray Tilley 207 Brookshire Lane Beckley, WV 25801 APPENDIX K PROJECT SCHEDULE - LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER PROJECT PROJECTSCHEDULE Mi les to ne Completion Date Procurement of Engineering Services Complete Project Design Complete Receipt of Funding June, 2009 I PSC Certificate Filing June, 2009 Construction Permits August, 2009 I Bid Advertisement September, 2009 Property Acquisition September, 2009 Bid Opening October, 2009 I PSC Approval November, 2009 Loan Closing/Contract Signing December, 2009 Begin Construction January, 2010 System Startup October, 201 0 I Project Closeout December, 201 0 APPENDIX L ROW SUMMARY EASEMENT ACQUISITION ROW Property Owner(s) District Tax Map Parcel Perm. ROW Date Acquis. Recorded Remarks ID# W L Acquired Cost County Book Page 3-01 Michael D & Sherry Williams HC 24 17 15' 03/11/09 $1 Lincoln 3-02 Geneva Browing HC 24 64 15' 02/25/09 $1 Lincoln 3-04 Michael D (11) & Shannon Williams HC 24 19 15' 05/08/09 $1 Lincoln 4-01 Odessa Manns HC 16 12 15' 03/04/09 $1 Lincoln 5-01 Charles & Marie Thomas HC 23 51 15' 03/02/09 $1 Lincoln -~ ~~ 5-02 Dorothy Maynard HC 23 2.1 15' 02/27/09 $1 Lincoln 5-03 William Ramey HC 23 26 15' 0311 0109 $1 Lincoln 5-04 Clarence Ramey HC 23 27 15' 03/04/09 $1 Lincoln 5-05 Rodney Ramey HC 23 25 15' 03/02/09 $1 Lincoln 6-01 Cathleen & Bobby Flemings HC 23 292 15' Li nco In 29 3 8-01 Donald & Minnie Manns HC 23 353 15' 04/2 1J09 $1 Lincoln 10-01 Tabatha & Joe Holtclaw HC 23 24 15' Lincoln 10-02 Vonnie Frye HC 23 17/17 1 15' 03/3 1/09 $1 Lincoln 10-03 Lonnie Vance HC 32 91 15' 03/11/09 $1 Lincoln 10-04 Darlena Rose Freeman HC 32 92 15' 0411 4/09 $0 Lincoln 10-05 Gordon Ray & Ruby Dalton HC 32 14 15' 03/3 1/09 $1 Lincoln Tank Dallas & Sarah E Dalton HC DB-218 Pg -314 029 Acres 02/18/09 $10,000 Lincoln B S Michael D (11) 8, Shannon D Williams HC DB-302 I Pg -422 I 0 04 I Acres I 05/08/09 I $8,000 , Lincoln I LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT GRlFFlTH & ASSOCIATES, PLLC 950 LITTLE COAL RIVER ROAD ALUM CREEK, WEST VIRGINIA 25003 Phone No. (304) 756 - 3600 June I, 2009 LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT - WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT PAGE NUMBER lntroduction Letter A Statement of Net Income 1 Schedule 1 - Detail of Operating Revenues 2 Schedule 2 - Detail of Operation and Maintenance Expenses 3-4 Schedule 3 - Depreciation, Depletion, and Amortization 5 Schedule 4 - Taxes Other Than Federal Income Taxes 6 Schedule 6 - Other Income 7 Schedule 7 - Other Income Deductions 8 B Plant In Service and Contributions Schedule 1 - Plant in Service 9-10 Schedule 10 - Contributions in Aid of Construction 11 C DebtlEquity Capital 12 D Bill Analysis 13-27 Schedule 1 - Per Books, Current and Proforma Tariff Rates 28 - 29 E Allocation of Cost of Service 30 F Balance Sheets 31 G Detail of Adjustments 32 - 33 H Cash Flow Analysis 34 18 Griffith & Associates, PLLC Accountants & Consultants -- 4 I Logan County Public Service District Mr. William Baisden, Manager Post Office Box 506 Logan, West Virginia 25601 Re: Logan County Public Service District - Water Operations Rule 42 Exhibit for Upper Little Harts Creek Water Extension Project Dear Mr. Baisden: This exhibit is a compilation of financial information as prescribed by Rule 42 of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia Rules of Practice and Procedure for the Filing of Targs. This exhibit is the basis for a recommendation for the water rates set forth to meet current operational requirements, needed capital improvements, the continued operations of the District’s water operations and for the pending project. We have prepared this report based on billing and other financial information for the District as of June 30, 2008 and we included the revenues requirements for the proposed project estimated to cost $2,710,000. The anticipated funding for the proposed project consists of a Small Cities Block Grant of $1,500,000, Infrastructure Fund Grant of $410,000 and an Infrastructure Fund Loan of $800,000 at zero (0) percent interest for 40 years. As a result of the extension project, 78 new customers (80% of 97 potential customers) will be added to the customer base and we estimated their monthly usage at 3,900 gallons. Based on our review, we recommend no increase to the District’s current rates and charges at this time. The District’s current rates are sufficient to provide a Going Level cash flow surplus of $36,360 with debt service coverage of 137.49%. The minimum bill, based on 2,000 gallons of water usage per month, currently is $16.94 and a monthly bill based on 4,000 gallons is $33.16. Incorporating the revenue requirements for the proposed project and 78 new customers at 3,900 gallons of usage per month produces a Proforma cash flow surplus of $34,241 with debt service coverage of 136.86%. We acknowledge the assistance of your employees and hereby submit this exhibit for filing. If you have any questions concerning this response feel free to contact my office. Sincerely, ~~~3#~ Michael D. Griffith, CPA, AFI Griffith & Associates, PLLC MDG/dk ...... MichaeCDO,Gnffith, P;4,;4FI 950 Littb CoacRjver @ad;4Cum Creek w25003 [email protected] Phone: (304) 756.3600 F‘acsimib: (304) 756.2911 W0110911:9704 AM M.\SHARED WORD FILESLcgen Co PSD\Cover Lettor for Rule 42. Water 51-00,doo STATEMENT A LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT - WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT STATEMENT OF NET INCOME FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 2008 GOING PER LEVEL GOING PROFORMA DESCRIPTION REFERENCE BOOKS ADJUSTMENTS LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS PROFORMA $ $ $ $ $ $ Operating Revenues Schedule 1 4,444,093 (23,843) 4,420,250 30,350 4,450,601 Operating Revenue Deductions Operation and Maintenance Exp. Schedule 2 2,853,229 2 1,235 2,874,464 8,552 2,883,016 -0 Depreciation Schedule Ti; 3 826,321 826,321 826,321 T.l Taxes Other Than Income Taxes Schedule 4 71,518 71,518 71,518 P) Ti; Total Operating Expenses 3,751,068 21,235 3,772,303 8,552 3,780,855 Q Net Operating Income Loss) 693,025 (45,078) 647,947 21,799 669,745 Plus: Other Income Schedule 6 38,878 38,878 38,878 Less: Other Income Deductions Schedule 7 396,023 (1 6,476) 379,547 379,547 P 0 Net Income (Loss) (A) 335,880 (28,602) 307,278 21,799 329,076 1. rc3 5 GOING RATE COMPARISONS PER BOOKS LEVEL PROPOSED 2,000Gallons $ 16.93 $ 16.94 $ 16.94 3,900Gallons - Res. Average 32.35 32.35 32.35 4,000Gallons 33.16 33.16 33.16 4,500Gallons 37.22 37.22 37.22 STATEMENT A SCHEDULE 1 LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT - WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT DETAIL OF OPERATING REVENUES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 2008 GOING PSC PER LEVEL GOING PROFORMA -Acct DESCRIPTION BOOKS ADJUSTMENTS LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS PROFORMA $ $ Sales of Water Water Sales to All Customers Except Resale 4,154,215 (23,191)(1) 4,131,024 29,521 (5) 4,160,545 Other Sales 462 Private Fire Protection Service 1,462 1,462 1,462 263 Public Fire Protection Service 464 Other Sales to Public Authorities 0- 465 Sales to Irrigation Customers Y 466 Sales for Resale 161,590 161,590 161,590 467 Interdepartmental Sales Other Operating Revenues P 470 Forfeited Discounts 116,707 116,055 829 (6) 116,885 471 Miscellaneous Service Revenues 28,850 28,850 28,850 472 Rents From Water Property 473 Interdepartmental Rents 474 Other Water Revenues -18,731 -18,731 -18,731 D:: TOTAL WATER OPERATING REVENUES 4,444,093 (23,843) 4,420,250 30,350 4,450,601 2.81% "UNAUDITED" GOING RATE COMPARISONS PER BOOKS LEVEL PROPOSED 2,000 Gallons $ 16.93 16.94 $ 16.94 3,900 Gallons - Res. Average 32.35 32.35 32.35 4,000Gallons 33.16 33.16 33.16 4,500Gallons 37.22 37.22 37.22 STATEMENT A SCHEDULE 2 LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT - WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT DETAIL OF OPERATING EXPENSES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 2008 GOING PSC PER LEVEL GOING PROFORMA && DESCRIPTION BOOKS ADJUSTMENTS DJUSTMENTS pR $ $ $ $ Source of Supply Expenses 600 Operation Labor -$ 601 Purchased Water 214,190 214,190 214,190 613 Maintenance of Lake, River 8 Other Intakes 1,597 1.597 1,597 617 Maintenance of Misc. Water Source Plant 91 91 91 Total Source of Supply Expenses 215,878 215,878 215,878 Pumping Expenses 620 Operation Labor 61 61 51 621 Fuel for Power Production 522 Fuel or Power Purchased for Pumping 210,397 210,397 210,397 624 Pumping Labor 8 Expenses 10,227 10,227 10,227 626 Miscellaneous Expenses -D 8,833 8,833 8,833 627 Rents 19,933 19,933 19,933 631 Maintenance of Structures & Improvements U3 5,181 5.181 5,181 a, 627 Maintenance of Power Production Equipment 24,574 24,574 24,574 3 627 Maintenance of Pumping Equipment 66,054 66,054 65,054 Q Total Pumplng Expenses 345,260 345,260 345,260 Yu Water Treatment Expenses Ez 640 Operation Supervision 8 Engineering -$ 7 641 Chemicals 111,231 111,231 111,231 a, 642 Operation Labor 8 Expenses 217,301 217,301 217,301 (D 543 Miscellaneous Expenses 71,511 71,511 71,511 650 Maintenance of Structures 8 Improvements 15 15 15 P 651 Maintenance Supervision 8 Engineering 4,720 4,720 4,720 652 Maintenance of Water Treatment Equipment 21,524 21,524 21,524 -. 653 Maintenance of Meters 3 654 Maintenance of Hydrants -5 655 Maintenance of Other Plant 2 Total Water Treatment Expenses 425,302 426,302 426,302 D Transmission & Dlstrlbutlon Expenses 660 Operation Supervision 8 Engineering $ 6,624 6,624 $ 6,624 661 Storage Facilities Expenses 3,611 3,611 3,611 662 Transmission 8 Distribution Line Expenses 663 Meter Expenses 665 Miscellaneous Expenses 37,516 37,516 37,516 666 Rents 684 684 684 670 Maintenance Supervision 8 Engineering 16,667 16,667 16,667 671 Maintenance of Structures 8 Improvements 2,438 2,438 2,438 672 Maintenance of Distribution Reservoirs 8 Standpipes 2,810 2,810 2,810 673 Maintenance of Transmission 8 Distribution Mains 203,294 203,294 203,294 675 Maintenance of Services 105,098 105,098 105,098 676 Maintenance of Meters 45,626 45,626 45,626 677 Maintenance of Hydrants 7,027 7,027 7,027 678 Maintenance of Miscellaneous Plant 57,252 57,252 57,252 Total T&D Expenses 488,647 488,647 488,647 LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT -WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT DETAIL OF OPERATING EXPENSES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 2008 GOING PSC PER LEVEL GOING PROFORMA -Acct. DESCRIPTION BOOKS ADJUSTMENTS LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS PROFORMA $ $ $ $ $ Customer Accounts Expenses 901 Supervision $ 419 419 $ 419 902 Meter Reading Expenses 55,441 55,441 -0 55,441 3 903 Customer Records & Collection Expenses 127,251 127,251 127,251 U 904 Uncollectible Accounts 21,235 (3) 21,235 152 (7) 21,387 m 905 Misc. Customer Accounts Expenses 71,643 71,643" 71,643 P Total Customer Accounts Expenses 254,754 21,235 275,989 152 276,141 Yu z Administrative and General Expenses 5'2- D 920 Administrative and General Salaries 160,792 160,792 160,792 (D 92 1 Office Supplies and Other Expenses 58,061 58,061 58,061 ? 923 Outside Services Employed 22,198 22,198 22,198 0 924 Property Insurance 70,070 70,070 70,070 1. 3 925 Injuries and Damages 5,480 5,480 5,480 -5 92 6 Employee Pensions and Benefits 514,442 514,442 514,442 0 928 Regulatory Commission Expenses 15,936 15,936 15,936 9XX OPEB Adjustment s 930.2 Miscellaneous General Expenses 266,456 266,456 266,456 930.1 Institutional or Goodwill Advertising Expenses 2,197 2,197 2,197 93 1 Transportation Expenses 932 Maintenance of General Plant 6,756 6,756 6,756 Total Administrative and General Expenses 1,122,388 0 1,122,388 1,122,388 Rate Case Exoenses 0 Project Expenses per E.L. Robinson Eng. Co. 8,400 (8) 8,400 TOTAL WATER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE EXPENSES 2,853,229 21,235 2,874,464 8,552 2,883,016 "UNAUDITED" n STATEMENT A SCHEDULE 3 LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT - WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT DETAIL OF DEPRECIATION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 2008 GOING PSC co. PER LEVEL GOING PROFORMA Acct. Acct. DESCRIPTION --RATES BOOKS ADJUSTMENTS LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS PROFORMA $ $ $ $ $ Supply 312 2173 Collecting and Impounding Reservoirs 4.00% 311 2173 Structures 3.00% Pumping 73 ii; Treatment WLu 332 2172 Treatment Equipment 5.50% ii; n u Transmission & Distribution Y 341 2175 Tanks 3.50% z 343 2175 Mains 3.50% 5 5 345 2175 Services 7.00% P) 2 346 2175 Meters & Meter Installation 5.50% General Plant Assets 0 1. 392 2120 Transportation Equipment 6.00% cc3 399 2120 Other Equipment 7.00% 5 Total Depreciation 826,321 826,321 826,321 STATEMENT A SCHEDULE 4 LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT - WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT TAXES OTHER THAN INCOME TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 2008 GOING PSC PER LEVEL GOING PROFORMA -Acct. DESCRIPTION BOOKS ADJUSTMENTS -LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS PROFORMA $ 0 $ t t Taxes Other Than Income Taxes: 408.1 Payroll Related Taxes 71,518 71,518 71,518 Total Taxes Other Than Income Taxes 71,518 71,518 71,518 STATEMENT A SCHEDULE 6 LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT - WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT OTHER INCOME FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 2008 GOING PSC PER LEVEL GOING PROFORMA -Acct. DESCRIPTION BOOKS ADJUSTMENTS LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS PROFORMA $ $ $ $ $ Other Income 41 9 Interest Income 38,878 38,878 38,878 41 5 Other Income Total Other Income 38,878 38,878 38,878 STATEMENT A SCHEDULE 7 LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT - WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT OTHER INCOME DEDUCTIONS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 2008 GOING PSC PER LEVEL GOING PROFORMA Acct. DESCRIPTION BOOKS ADJUSTMENTS LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS PROFORMA $ $ $ $ $ Other Income Deductions 427 Long-Term Interest Expense 396,023 (16,476)(4) 379,547 379,547 431 Short-Term Interest Expense Total Other Income Deductions 396.023 (1 6,476) 379,547 379,547 TOTAL DEBT INTEREST 39 6,O 2 3 (1 6,476) 379,547 379,547 "UNAUDITED" D STATEMENT B SCHEDULE 1 LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT - WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT PLANT IN SERVICE - SHEET 1 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 Balance Balance Average PSC Beginning Other End Monthly -Acct. DESCRIPTION of Year Addltlons Retirements Charaes -of Year Balance $ $ $ $ $ $ Intangibleplant 302 Franchises and Consents 303 Miscellaneous Intangible Plant Total Intangible Plant Source of Supply Plant 9 310 Land & Land Rights 1 1 1 (D -0 31 1 Structures & Improvements 9) 31 2 Collecting & Impounding Reservoirs 2 313 Lake, River & Othyer Intakes 314 Wells & Springs w0- z 315 Infiltration Galleries & Tunnels E 31 6 Supply Mains 5 317 Other Water Source Plant a, E Total Source of Supply I I I P Pumplng Plant 0 1. 320 Land & Land Rights 3 32 1 Structures & Improvements 3 322 Boiler Plant Equipment 0 323 Other Power Production Equipment 324 Steam Pumping Equipment 325 Electric Pumping Equipment 326 Diesel Pumping Equipment 2,032,667 2,032,667 2,032,667 327 Hydraulic Pumping Equipment 328 Other Pumping Equipment Total Pumping Plant 2,032,667 2,032,667 2,032,667 Water Treatment Plant 330 Land 8 Land Rights 331 Structures & Improvements 3,865,066 3,865,066 3,865,066 332 Water Treatment Equipment 1,437,757 1,437,757 1,437,757 Total Water Treatment Plant 5,302,823 5,302,823 5,302,823 (0 "UNAUDITED" STATEMENT B SCHEDULE 1 LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT -WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT PLANT IN SERVICE - SHEET 2 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 Balance Balance Average PSC Beginning Other End Monthly && DESCRIPTION of Year Additionp Retirements Charges -of Year Balance $ $ $ $ $ $ Transmission & Distribution Plant 340 Land & Land Rights 341 Structures & Improvements 342 Distribution Reservoirs & Standpipes 4,618,289 4,618,289 4,618,289 343 Transmission & Distribution Mains 37,141,603 37,141,603 37,141,603 344 Fire Mains 345 Services 3,092,306 3,092,306 3,092,306 346 Maters 347 Meter Installations 348 Hydrants 1,086,602 1,086,602 1,086,602 349 Other Transmission & Distribution Plant 565,759 565,759 565,759 U Total Transmission & Distribution Plant 46,504,559 46,504,559 46,504,559 Y General Plant 389 Land & Land Rights 334,624 334,624 334,624 390 Structures 8 Improvements 428,003 428,003 428,003 P 39 I Office Furniture & Equipment 172,770 172,770 172,770 392 Transportation Equipment 338,278 0 338,278 338,278 1. 393 Stores Equipment EJ EJ 394 Tools, Shop, & Garage Equipment 3 395 Laboratory Equipment 0 396 Power Operated Equipment 425,741 425,741 425,741 397 Communication Equipment 398 Miscellaneous Equipment 27,906 27,906 27,906 399 Other Tangible Property Total General Plant 1,727,322 1,727,322 1,727,322 107 Project Proforma 2,710,000 Totals 55,567,372 55,567,372 58,277,372 4 0 "UNAUDITED" LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT - WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRIBUTIONS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 2007 Balance Balance Average PSC Beginning Other End Monthly -Acct. DESCRIPTION of Year Additions Retirements Charaes -of Year Balance $ $ $ $ $ $ 30X Intangible Plant 31 1.X Land & Land Rights 312.X Structures & Improvements 32X Collecting System 33x Pumping System D Total Supply Y 35x Treatment & Disposal Total Treatment & Disposal System P 0 342 Tanks 21. 343 Mains 5 345 Services 346 Meters & Meter Installation Total Transmission & Distribution 392 Transportation Equipment 399 Other Equipment Total General Plant Assets Totals 26,375,109 505,427 26,880,536 26,627,823 Per Books Adjustments Per Books Adjusted "UNAUDITED' STATEMENT C LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT -WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT DEBT @JUNE 30,2008 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 PSC Outstanding Interest 2009 2009 -Acct. Class of Obliaation Years Pr in c iP a I -Rate PrinciPal -Interest Princ. 8 Interest $ $ $ Lena Term Debt 221 Water Revenue Bonds Series 96-B 30 1,350,266 3.00% 45,239 41,359 86,598 Water Revenue Bonds Series 97-A 40 840,992 3.00% 17,501 25,559 43,060 Water Revenue Bonds Series 97-8 40 867,807 2.00% 22,130 17,633 39,763 Water Revenue Bonds Series 98-A 40 651,852 1.OO% 18,543 6,635 25,178 -u Water Revenue Bonds Series 99-A 40 4,513,960 0.00% 147,720 147,720 3 -0 Water Revenue Bonds Series 99-C 40 2,071,990 0.00% 125,412 125,412 a, Water Revenue Bonds Series 99-D 3 20 246,788 5.80% 13,989 14,719 28,708 Tz Water Revenue Bonds Series 01-A 40 3,653,168 5.80% 39,462 213,028 252,490 CJ Water Revenue Bonds Series 01-8 Y 40 2,305,902 0.00% 69,352 69,352 z Water Revenue Bonds Series 02-A 40 1,263,871 4.75% 14,975 60,613 75,588 5. Water Revenue Bonds Series 02-8 40 972,258 0.00% 28,387 28,387 5 n, Water Revenue Bonds Series 03-A Refunding 6 156,301 4.00% - #I (D Water Revenue Bonds Series 03-8 40 3,317,647 0.00% 94,118 94,118 ? Water Revenue Bonds Series 05-A 40 887,039 0.00% 24,139 24,139 0 Water Revenue Bonds Series 07-A 20 200,000 0.00% 10,000 10,000 2. 2 Water Revenue Bonds Series 08-A (1,900,000) 38 92,943 0.00% 50.000 50.000 #2 5 23,392,784 720,967 379,547 1,100,513 0 Proiect Loans WVlJDC loan 40 800,000 0.00% 21,053 27,053 (Amortized over 38 Years) Totals 24,192,784 742,020 379,547 1,I 21,566 #I Per PSD prepared going level debt analysis draft. #2 Per Case No.07-2188-PWD-E-CN "UNAUDITED" STATEMENT D SCHEDULE I LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT - WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT CUSTOMER BILL ANALYSIS - PER BOOKS (12 MOS) SHEET 1 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 2,000 4,000 4,500 RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS Gallons Gallons Gallons [$ 16.94 $ 33.16 $ 37.22 I PER NUMBER MINIMUM MIN.BlLL FIRST NEXT NEXT OVER CALCULATED BOOKS MINIMUM BILLS OF BILLS MGALS RATE REVENUE 2,000 58,000 240,000 300,000 REVENUE REVENUE 518 Inch Meters 27,888 21,119.4 $ 16.93 $472,144 3/4 Inch Meters 25.40 1 Inch Meters 42.34 1 1/4 Inch Meters 61.82 1 1/2 Inch Meters 84.68 2 Inch Meters 135.52 3 Inch Meters 254.06 4 Inch Meters 423.44 6 Inch Meters 848.47 Yu 8 Inch Meters 1,358.85 10 Inch Meters OVER THE MINIMUMS 2,001-60,000 Gallons 79,237 386,254.2 158,474.0 227,780.2 P 60,001-300,000 Gallons 36 4,340.0 72.0 2,088.0 2,180.0 Over 300,000 Gallons 5 3,305.5 10.0 290.0 1200.0 1,805.5 TOTALS 107,166 41 5,019.1 158,556.0 230,158.2 3,380.0 1,805.5 PER BOOKS RATES 8-47 8.1 1 5.98 3.13 PER BOOKS REVENUES PER ANALYSIS 472,144 1,342,969 1,866,583 20,212 5,651 3,707,559 3,649,875 CORRECTION FACTOR 0.984441 Average 8,931 3.9 STATEMENT D SCHEDULE I LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT - WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT CUSTOMER BILL ANALYSIS - PER BOOKS (12 MOS) SHEET 2 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 2,000 4,000 4,500 COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS Gallons Gallons Gallons I $ 16.94 $ 33.16 $ 37.22 I PER NUMBER MINIMUM MIN. BILL FIRST NEXT NEXT OVER CALCULATED BOOKS MINIMUM BILLS OF BILLS MGALS RATE REVENUE 2,000 58,000 240,000 300,000 REVENUE REVENUE 518 Inch Meters 2,283 1,325.6 $ 16.93 $ 38,651 314 Inch Meters 30 40.7 25.40 762 1 Inch Meters 96 128.1 42.34 4,065 -0 3 1 114 Inch Meters 3 6.8 61.82 185 U 1 112 Inch Meters 49 33.3 84.68 4,149 a, 3 2 Inch Meters 86 253.7 135.52 11,655 P 3 Inch Meters 3 51.7 254.06 762 IJ Y 4 Inch Meters 423.44 6 Inch Meters 848.47 8 Inch Meters 1,358.85 10 Inch Meters p OVER THE MINIMUMS s 2,001-60,000 Gallons 2,203 24,171.1 4,406.0 19,765.1 2 60,001-300,000 Gallons 105 14,929.3 210.0 6,090.0 8,629.3 5 Over 300,000 Gallons 11 4,804.3 22.0 638.0 2640.0 1,504.3 TOTALS 4,869 45,744.6 4,638.0 26,493.1 11,269.3 1,504.3 PER BOOKS RATES 8.47 8.1 1 5.98 3.13 PER BOOKS REVENUES PER ANALYSIS 60,230 39,284 214,859 67,390 4,708 386,471 383,777 CORRECTION FACTOR 0.993029 Average 406 9.4 STATEMENT D SCHEDULE 1 LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT -WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT CUSTOMER BILL ANALYSIS - PER BOOKS (12 MOS) SHEET 3 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 2,000 4,000 4,500 INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS Gallons Gallons Gallons I $ 16.94 $ 33.16 $ 37.22 I PER NUMBER MINIMUM MIN. BILL FIRST NEXT NEXT OVER CALCULATED BOOKS MINIMUM BILLS OF BILLS MGALS RATE REVENUE 2,000 58,000 240,000 300,000 REVENUE REVENUE 5/8 Inch Meters $ 16.93 $ - 314 Inch Meters 25.40 1 inch Meters 42.34 1 1/4 inch Meters 61.82 1 112 Inch Meters 84.68 2 inch Meters 135.52 (3 Y 3 Inch Meters 254.06 4 Inch Meters 423.44 6 Inch Meters 848.47 8 Inch Meters 1,358.85 P 10 inch Meters s OVER THE MINIMUMS 2 2,001-60,000 Gallons 2 94.8 4.0 90.8 5 60,001-300,000 Gallons 3 195.3 6.0 174.0 15.3 0 Over 300,000 Gallons 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 73 D TOTALS 5 290.1 10.0 264.8 15.3 0.0 PER BOOKS RATES 8.47 8.1 1 5.98 3.13 PER BOOKS REVENUES PER ANALYSIS as 2,148 91 0 2,324 2,324 CORRECTION FACTOR 1.000120 Average 0 58.0 STATEMENT D SCHEDULE 1 LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT -WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT CUSTOMER BILL ANALYSIS - PER BOOKS (12 MOS) SHEET 4 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 2,000 4,000 4,500 PUBLIC AUTHORITY CUSTOMERS Gallons Gallons Gallons I $ 16.94 $ 33.16 $ 37.22 I PER NUMBER MINIMUM MIN. BILL FIRST NEXT NEXT OVER CALCULATED BOOKS MINIMUM BILLS OF BILLS MGALS RATE REVENUE 2,000 58,000 240,000 300,000 REVENUE REVENUE 518 Inch Meters 249 125.4 $ 16.93 $ 4,216 314 Inch Meters 25.40 1 Inch Meters 8 27.9 42.34 339 1 114 Inch Meters 61.82 1 112 Inch Meters 12 84.68 1,016 2 Inch Meters 41 91.2 135.52 5,556 0- Y 3 Inch Meters 254.06 4 Inch Meters 423.44 6 Inch Meters 848.47 8 Inch Meters 1,358.85 P 10 Inch Meters OVER THE MINIMUMS 2,001-60,000 Gallons 256 3,269.0 512.0 2,757.0 60,001 -300,000 Gallons 9 1,020.0 18.0 522.0 480.0 6 Over 300,000 Gallons 20 17,226.8 40.0 1160.0 4800.0 11,226.8 D TOTALS 595 21,760.3 570.0 4,439.0 5,280.0 11,226.8 PER BOOKS RATES 8.47 8.1 1 5.98 3.13 PER BOOKS REVENUES PER ANALYSIS 11,127 4,828 36,000 31,574 35,140 118,669 118,239 CORRECTION FACTOR 0.996376 Average 50 36.6 TOTAL PER BOOKS REVENUES: 4215,024 4,154,215 0.985573 STATEMENT D SCHEDULE I LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT -WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT CUSTOMER BILL ANALYSIS - PER BOOKS (12 MOS) SHEET 5 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 2,000 4,000 4,500 RESALE CUSTOMERS Gallons Gallons Gallons 1 $ 3.00 $ 6.00 $ 6.75 I PER NUMBER MINIMUM MIN. BILL FIRST NEXT NEXT OVER CALCULATED BOOKS MINIMUM BILLS OF BILLS MGALS RATE REVENUE 2,000 58,000 240,000 300,000 REVENUE REVENUE 518 Inch Meters $ 16.93 $ - 314 Inch Meters 25.40 '0 ii; 1 Inch Meters 42.34 D 1 114 Inch Meters a, 61.82 ii; 1 112 Inch Meters 84.68 n 2 Inch Meters 135.52 0- Y 3 Inch Meters 254.06 4 Inch Meters 423.44 6 Inch Meters 848.47 8 Inch Meters 1,358.85 P 10 Inch Meters 0 1. Resale 41 111,869 1.50 167,803 rc3 5 OVER THE MINIMUMS 0 2,001 -60,000 Gallons 0.0 0.0 60,001-300,000 Gallons 0.0 0.0 0.0 Over 300,000 Gallons 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTALS 41 111,868.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PER BOOKS RATES 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 PER BOOKS REVENUES PER ANALYSIS 167,803 0 0 0 0 167,803 161,590 CORRECTION FACTOR 0.962975 Average 3 2,728.5 STATEMENT D SCHEDULE 2 LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT -WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT CUSTOMER BILL ANALYSIS - GOING LEVEL (12 MOS) SHEET 6 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 2,000 3,900 4,000 4,500 RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons I $ 16.94 $ 32.35 I $ 33.16 I $ 37.22 1 GOING NUMBER MINIMUM MIN. BILL FIRST NEXT NEXT OVER CALCULATED LEVEL MINIMUM BILLS OF BILLS MGALS RATE REVENUE 2,000 58,000 240,000 300,000 REVENUE REVENUE 5/8 Inch Meters 27,888 21,119.4 $ 16.94 $ 472,423 3/4 Inch Meters 25.41 1 Inch Meters 42.35 1 114 Inch Meters 61.83 1 1/2 Inch Meters 84.70 2 Inch Meters 135.52 3 Inch Meters 254.10 P- 4 Inch Meters 423.50 Y 6 Inch Meters 847.00 8 Inch Meters 1,355.20 10 Inch Meters 3,472.70 P OVER THE MINIMUMS 2,001-60,000 Gallons 79,237 386,254.2 158,474.0 227,780.2 60,001 -300,000 Gallons 36 4,340.0 72.0 2,088.0 2,180.0 Over 300,000 Gallons 5 3,305.5 10.0 290.0 1200.0 1,805.5 TOTALS 107,166 415,019.1 158,556.0 230,158.2 3,380.0 1,805.5 GOING LEVEL RATES 8.47 8.1 1 5.98 3.13 GOING LEVEL REVENUES PER ANALYSIS 472,423 1,342,969 1,866,583 20,212 5,651 3,707,838 3,633,682 CORRECTION FACTOR 0.980000 Average 8,93 1 3.9 STATEMENT D SCHEDULE 2 LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT - WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT CUSTOMER BILL ANALYSIS - GOING LEVEL (12 MOS) SHEET 7 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 2,000 4,000 4,500 COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS Ga II o ns Gallons Gallons I $ 16.94 $ 33.16 $ 37.22 I GOING NUMBER MINIMUM MIN. BILL FIRST NEXT NEXT OVER CALCULATED LEVEL MINIMUM BILLS OF BILLS MGALS RATE REVENUE 2,000 58,000 240,000 300,000 REVENUE REVENUE 518 Inch Meters 2,283 1,325.6 $ 16.94 $ 38,674 314 Inch Meters 30 40.7 25.41 762 1 Inch Meters 96 128.1 42.35 4,066 1 114 Inch Meters 3 6.8 61.83 185 0- 1 112 Inch Meters 49 33.3 84.70 4,150 Y 2 Inch Meters 86 253.7 135.52 1 1,655 3 Inch Meters 3 51.7 254.10 762 4 Inch Meters 423.50 6 Inch Meters 847.00 P 8 Inch Meters 1,355.20 10 Inch Meters OVER THE MINIMUMS 2,001-60,000 Gallons 2,203 24,171.1 4,406.0 19,765.1 0 60,001-300,000 Gallons 105 14,929.3 210.0 6,090.0 8,629.3 Over 300,000 Gallons 11 4,804.3 22.0 638.0 2640.0 1,504.3 TOTALS 4,869 45,744.6 4,638.0 26,493.1 11,269.3 1,504.3 GOING LEVEL RATES 8.47 8.1 1 5.98 3.13 GOING LEVEL REVENUES PER ANALYSIS 60,255 39,284 214,059 67,390 4,708 386,497 378,767 CORRECTION FACTOR 0.980000 Average 406 9.4 STATEMENT D SCHEDULE 2 LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT - WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT CUSTOMER BILL ANALYSIS - GOING LEVEL (12 MOS) SHEET 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 2,000 4,000 4,500 INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS Gallons Gallons Gallons I $ 10.94 $ 33.10 $ 37.22 1 GOING NUMBER MINIMUM MIN. BILL FIRST NEXT NEXT OVER CALCULATED LEVEL MINIMUM BILLS OF BILLS MGALS RATE REVENUE 2,000 58,000 240,000 300,000 REVENUE REVENUE 518 Inch Meters $ 16.94 $ 314 Inch Meters 25.41 1 Inch Meters 42.35 0 1 114 Inch Meters 61.83 Y 1 112 Inch Meters 84.70 2 Inch Meters 135.52 3 Inch Meters 254.10 4 Inch Meters 423.50 u 6 Inch Meters 847.00 0 8 Inch Meters 1,355.20 2. 3 3 OVER THE MINIMUMS 2,001-60,000 Gallons 2 94.8 4.0 90.8 60,001-300,000 Gallons 3 195.3 6.0 174.0 15.3 Over 300,000 Gallons 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTALS 5 290.1 10.0 264.8 15.3 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 GOING LEVEL RATES 8.47 8.1 1 5.98 3.13 GOING LEVEL REVENUES PER ANALYSIS 85 2,148 91 0 2,324 2,277 CORRECTION FACTOR 0.980000 Average 0 58.0 STATEMENT D SCHEDULE 2 LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT - WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT CUSTOMER BILL ANALYSIS - GOING LEVEL (12 MOS) SHEET 9 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 2,000 4,000 4,500 PUBLIC AUTHORITY CUSTOMERS Gallons Gallons Gallons I $ 10.94 $ 33.16 $ 37.22 I GOING NUMBER MINIMUM MIN. BILL FIRST NEXT NEXT OVER CALCULATED LEVEL MINIMUM BILLS OF BILLS MGALS RATE REVENUE 2,000 58,000 240,000 300,000 REVENUE REVENUE 5/8 Inch Meters 249 125.4 $ 16.94 $ 4,218 3/4 Inch Meters 25.41 -0 1 Inch Meters 8 27.9 42.35 339 3 1 1/4 Inch Meters 61.83 U a, 1 1/2 Inch Meters 12 84.70 1,016 3 Inch Meters P 2 41 91.2 135.52 5,556 0- 3 Inch Meters 254.10 Y 4 Inch Meters 423.50 6 Inch Meters 847.00 8 Inch Meters 1,355.20 P OVER THE MINIMUMS 2,001-60,000Gallons 256 3,269.0 512.0 2,757.0 60,001-300,000 Gallons 9 1,020.0 18.0 522.0 480.0 Over 300,000Gallons 20 17,226.8 40.0 1160.0 4800.0 11,226.8 TOTALS 595 21,760.3 570.0 4,439.0 5,280.0 11,226.8 GOING LEVEL RATES 8.47 8.1 1 5.98 3.13 GOING LEVEL REVENUES PER ANALYSIS 11,130 4,828 30,000 31,574 35,140 118,672 116,298 CORRECTION FACTOR 0.980000 Average 50 36.6 TOTAL GOING LEVEL REVENUES: 4,215,330 4,131,024 0.980000 Y STATEMENT D SCHEDULE 2 LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT -WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT CUSTOMER BILL ANALYSIS - GOING LEVEL (12 MOS) SHEET 10 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 RESALE CUSTOMERS GOING NUMBER MINIMUM MIN. BILL FIRST NEXT NEXT OVER CALCULATED LEVEL MINIMUM BILLS OF BILLS MGALS RATE REVENUE 2,000 58,000 240,000 300,000 REVENUE REVENUE 518 Inch Meters $ 16.94 $ 314 Inch Meters 25.41 1 Inch Meters 42.35 1 1/4 Inch Meters 61.83 1 112 Inch Meters 84.70 u 2 Inch Meters 135.52 Y 3 Inch Meters 254.10 4 Inch Meters 423.50 6 Inch Meters 847.00 8 Inch Meters 1.355.20 0 Resale 41 111,869 1.50 167,803 1. 2 R OVER THE MINIMUMS 5 2,001-60,000 Gallons 0.0 0.0 60,001-300,000 Gallons 0.0 0.0 0.0 Over 300,000 Gallons 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTALS 41 111,868.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GOING LEVEL RATES 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 GOING LEVEL REVENUES PER ANALYSIS 167,803 0 0 0 0 167,803 161,590 CORRECTION FACTOR 0.962975 Average 3 2,728.5 STATEMENT D SCHEDULE 3 LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT - WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT SHEET 11 CUSTOMER BILL ANALYSIS - PROFORMA (12 MOS) FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30,2009 2.000 3,900 4,000 4,500 RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS Gallons Gallons Gallons Gallons 10 16.94 t 32.35 18 33.16 t 37.22 I NUMBER- ~~ MINIMUM MIN.BlLL FIRST NEXT NEXT OVER CALCULATED PROFORMA MINIMUM BILLS OF BILLS MGALS RATE REVENUE 2,000 58,000 240,000 300,000 REVENUE REVENUE 5/8 Inch Meters 27,888 21,119.4 $ 16.94 $ 472,423 314 Inch Meters 25.41 1 Inch Meters 42.35 1 1/4 Inch Meters 61.83 1 1/2 Inch Meters 84.70 Inch Meters D 2 135.52 Y 3 Inch Meters 254.10 4 Inch Meters 423.50 6 Inch Meters 847.00 8 Inch Meters 1,355.20 P OVER THE MINIMUMS 2,001-60,000Gallons 80,168 389,885.9 160,336.4 229,549.5 60.001-300.000 Gallons 36 4,340.0 72.0 2,088.0 2,180.0 Over 300,000Gallons 5 3,30 5.5 10.0 290.0 1200.0 1,805.5 TOTALS 108,097 418,650.8 160,418.4 231,927.5 3,380.0 1,805.5 PROFORMA RATES 8.47 8.1 1 5.98 3.13 PROFORMA REVENUES PER ANALYSIS 472,423 1,358,744 1,880,932 20,212 5,651 3,737,962 3,663,202 CORRECTION FACTOR 0.980000 Average 9,008 3.9 * Includes 97 new customers (used 80% or 78 x 3,900 gallondmo) STATEMENT D SCHEDULE 3 LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT -WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT CUSTOMER BILL ANALYSIS - PROFORMA (12 MOS) SHEET 12 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 2,000 4,000 4,500 COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS Gallons Gallons Gallons [ $ 16.94 $ 33.16 $ 37.22 I NUMBER MINIMUM MIN.BILL FIRST NEXT NEXT OVER CALCULATED PROFORMA MINIMUM BILLS OF BILLS MGALS RATE REVENUE 2,000 58,000 240,000 300,000 REVENUE REVENUE 5/8 Inch Meters 2.283 1,325.6 $ 16.94 $ 38,674 314 Inch Meters 30 40.7 25.41 762 1 Inch Meters 96 128.1 42.35 4,066 1 1/4 Inch Meters 3 6.8 61.83 185 1 1/2 Inch Meters 0- 49 33.3 84.70 4,150 Y 2 Inch Meters 86 253.7 135.52 11,655 3 Inch Meters 3 51.7 254.1 0 762 4 Inch Meters 423.50 6 Inch Meters 847.00 8 Inch Meters 1,355.20 P 0 OVER THE MINIMUMS 2. 2,001-60,000 Gallons 2,203 24,171.1 4,406.0 19,765.1 2 60,001-300,000 Gallons 105 14,929.3 210.0 6,090.0 8,629.3 5 Over 300,000 Gallons 11 4,804.3 22.0 638.0 2640.0 1,504.3 0 TOTALS 4,869 45,744.6 4,638.0 26,493.1 11,269.3 1,504.3 PROFORMA RATES 8.47 8.1 1 5.98 3.13 PROFORMA REVENUES PER ANALYSIS 60,255 39,284 214,859 67,390 4,708 386,497 378,767 CORRECTION FACTOR 0.980000 Average 406 9.4 STATEMENT D SCHEDULE 3 LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT - WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT CUSTOMER BILL ANALYSIS - PROFORMA (12 MOS) SHEET 13 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 2,000 4,000 4,500 INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS Gallons Gallonr Gallons I t li;.Pd $ 33-16 5 37.22 1 NUMBER MINIMUM MIN.BlLL FIRST NEXT NEXT OVER CALCULATED PROFORMA MINIMUM BILLS OF BILLS MGALS RATE REVENUE 2.000 58.000 240.000 300,000 REVENUE REVENUE 5/8 Inch Meters 3/4 Inch Meters 25.41 1 Inch Meters 42.35 u 1 1/4 Inch Meters 61.83 Y 1 1/2 Inch Meters 84.70 2 Inch Meters 135.52 3 Inch Meters 254.1 0 4 Inch Meters 423.50 6 Inch Meters 847.00 P 8 Inch Meters 1,355.20 OVER THE MINIMUMS 2,001-60,000 Gallons 2 94.8 4.0 90.8 60,001-300,000 Gallons 3 195.3 6.0 174.0 15.3 Over 300,000 Gallons 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTALS 5 290.1 10.0 264.8 15.3 0.0 PROFORMA RATES 8.47 8.1 1 5.98 3.13 PROFORMA REVENUES PER ANALYSIS 85 2,148 91 0 2,324 2,277 CORRECTION FACTOR 0.980000 Average 0 58.0 STATEMENT D SCHEDULE 3 LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT - WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT CUSTOMER BILL ANALYSIS - PROFORMA (12 MOS) SHEET 14 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 2,000 4,000 4,500 PUBLIC AUTHORITY CUSTOMERS Gallons Gallons Gallons 1 8 16.94 8 33.16 8 37.22 I NUMBER MINIMUM MIN.BILL FIRST NEXT NEXT OVER CALCULATED PROFORMA MINIMUM BILLS OF BILLS MGALS RATE REVENUE 2,000 58,000 240,000 300,000 REVENUE REVENUE 5/8 Inch Meters 249 125.4 $ 16.94 $ 4,218 3/4 Inch Meters 25.41 1 Inch Meters 8 27.9 42.35 339 1 1/4 Inch Meters 0- 61.83 Y 1 1/2 Inch Meters 12 84.70 1,016 2 Inch Meters 41 91.2 135.52 5,556 3 Inch Meters 254.10 4 Inch Meters 423.50 6 Inch Meters 847.00 8 Inch Meters 1,355.20 OVER THE MINIMUMS 2,001-60,000 Gallons 256 3,269.0 512.0 2,757.0 60,001-300,000 Gallons 9 1,020.0 18.0 522.0 480.0 Over 300,000 Gallons 20 17,226.8 40.0 1160.0 4800.0 11,226.8 TOTALS 595 21,760.3 570.0 4,439.0 5,280.0 11,226.8 PROFORMA RATES 8.47 8.11 5.98 3.1 3 PROFORMA REVENUES PER ANALYSIS 11,130 4,828 36,000 31,574 35,140 118,672 I16,298 CORRECTION FACTOR 0.980000 Average 50 36.6 TOTAL PROFORMA REVENUES: 4,245,454 4,160,545 0.980000 STATEMENT D SCHEDULE 3 LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT -WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT CUSTOMER BILL ANALYSIS - PROFORMA (12 MOS) SHEET 15 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 RESALE CUSTOMERS NUMBER MINIMUM MIN.BlLL FIRST NEXT NEXT OVER CALCULATED PROFORMA MINIMUM BILLS OF BILLS MGALS RATE REVENUE 2,000 58,000 240,000 300,000 REVENUE REVENUE 518 Inch Meters $ 16.94 $ - us 3/4 Inch Meters 25.41 a, 1 Inch Meters 42.35 i3 1 1/4 Inch Meters 61.83 Q 1 1/2 Inch Meters 84.70 0- Y 2 Inch Meters 135.52 3 Inch Meters 254.10 4 Inch Meters 423.50 6 Inch Meters 847.00 8 Inch Meters 1,355.20 P Resale 41 111,869 1.50 167,803 0 2. 2 OVER THE MINIMUMS -5 2,001-60,000 Gallons 0.0 0.0 60,001-300,000 Gallons 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 Over 300,000 Gallons 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D TOTALS 41 111,868.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PROFORMA RATES 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 PROFORMA REVENUES PER ANALYSIS 167,803 0 0 0 0 167,803 161,590 CORRECTION FACTOR 0.962975 Average 3 2.728.5 LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT - WATER STATEMENT D UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT SCHEDULE 1 PER BOOKS, CURRENT AND PROFORMA TARIFF PAGE 1 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 APPLICABILITY Applicable within the entire territory served AVAllABlLlTY Available for general domestic, commercial, industrial and sale for resale water service. RATES (Customers with metered water supply) First 2,000 gallons used per month $ 8.47 per 1,000 gallons Next 58,000 gallons used per month $ 8.11 per 1,000 gallons Next 240,000 gallons used per month $ 5.98 per 1,000 gallons All Over 300,000 gallons used per month $ 3.13 per 1,000 gallons MINIMUM CHARGE 518 inch meter $ 16.93 per month 314 inch meter $ 25.40 per month 1 inch meter $ 42.34 per month 1 1/4 inch meter $ 61.82 per month 1 112 inch meter $ 84.68 per month 2 inch meter $ 135.52 per month 3 inch meter $ 254.06 per month 4 inch meter $ 423.44 per month 6 inch meter $ 848.47 per month 8 inch meter $ 1,358.85 per month FIAT RATE CHARGE (Customers with non-metered water supply) Equivalent of 4,500 gallons, $37.19 DELAYED PAYMENT PENALTY The above schedule is net. On all accounts not paid in full when due, ten percent (10%) will be added to the net current amount unpaid. This delayed payment penalty is not interest and is to be collected only once for each bill where it is appropriate. TAP FEE The following charges are to be made whenever the utility installs a new tap to serve an applicant: A tap fee of $100.00 will be charged to customers applying for service before construction is completed adjacent to the customer's premises in connection with a certificate proceeding before the Commission. This pre-construction tap fee will be invalid after the completion of construction adjacent to an applicant's premises that is associated with a certificate proceeding. A tap fee of $250.00 will be charged to all customers who apply for service outisde a certificate proceeding before the Commission for each new tap to the system. RECONNECTION $20.00 To be charged whenever the supply of water is turned off for violations of rules, non-payment of bills, or fraudulent use of water. Prepared by Michael D. Griffith, CPA Page 28 LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT - WATER STATEMENT D UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT SCHEDULE 1 PER BOOKS, CURRENT AND PROFORMA TARIFF PAGE 2 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 RETURNED CHECK CHARGE A service charge equal to the actual bank fee assessed to the District or a maximum of $25.00 will be will be imposed upon any customer whose check for payment of charges is returned by their bank due to in- sufficient funds. LEAK ADJUSTMENT $0.97 per 1,000 gallons is to be used when a bills reflects unusual consumption which can be attributed to eligible leakage on the customer's side of the meter. This rate shall be applied to all such unusual consumption above the customer's historical average usage. Prepared by Michael D. Griffith, CPA Page 29 LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT -WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT STATEMENT E ALLOCATION OF COST OF SERVICE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 NOT APPLICABLE. u Y P LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT -WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT BALANCE SHEETS BASED ON FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 ASSETS -2007 -2008 Current Assets: Cash -136,321 -95,195 Accounts Receivable - Net 1,131,314 1,213,928 ACC.Provision for Uncollectibies Special Deposits 194,116 187,415 Accrued Utility Revenues Materials 8 Supplies 71,621 71,621 Prepayments Total Current Assets 1,260,730 1,377,769 Restricted Assets: Depreciation Fund 91,698 112,403 Sinking Funds 155,094 177,714 Other Special Funds 851,401 962,970 Total Restricted Assets 1,098,193 1,253.087 Fixed Assets: Water Property, Plant and Equipment 63,023,527 63,208,153 Less Accumulated Depreciation (10,646,562) (1 1,472,883) Utility Plant Adjustments Total Net Fixed Assets 52,376,965 51,735,270 Deferred Debits: Unamortized Debt Discount & Expense 424,468 424,468 Preliminary Survey & Investigation Charges Miscellaneous Deferred Debits Total Deferred Debits 424,468 424,468 TOTAL ASSETS 55,160,358 54,790,594 LIABILITIES AND EQUITY Current Liabilities: Tax Collections Payable Accounts Payable 154,606 302,905 Customer Deposits 212,110 206,821 lntrest & Taxes Accrued 72,740 75,060 Miscellaneous Current & Accrued Liabilities 20,658 20,658 Total Current Liabilities 460,114 605,444 Long-Term Debt: Bonds Other Long Term Debt 24,867,632 23,511,584 Total Long Term Debt 24,867,632 23511,584 Fund Equity: Other Deferred Credits Retained Earnings 3,457,503 3,793,030 Total Equity 3,457,503 3,793,030 Contributions in Aid of Construction 26,375,109 26,880,536 Adjustment TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 55,160,358 54,790,594 Prepared by Michael D. Griffith, CPA Page 31 STATEMENT G SCHEDULE 1 Going Level Adjustments LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT - WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT DETAIL OF ADJUSTMENTS Going Level Adjusfmenfs ADJMT Acc't INCREASE --NUMBER Number (DECREASE) Sched. 1 46X Customer Water Sales (23,191) A- 1 To adjust to the projected level of revenues to be generated by the proposed rates. 2 46X Forfeited Discounts (652) A- 1 To adjust to reflect going level increase in penalties as a function of increased water sales based on proposed rates and charges. 3 904 Uncollectible Accounts 21,235 A-2 To adjust uncollectibles to 5% of going level sales plus penalties. 4 427 Other Income Deductions: Interest Expense (16,476) A-7 To adjust interest expense to going level. LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT -WATER STATEMENT G UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT SCHEDULE 2 DETAIL OF ADJUSTMENTS Pro Forma Adjustments pro forma adjustments ADJMT Acc't INCREASE NUMBER Number IDECREASE) Sched. $ 5 46X Customer Water Sales 29,521 A- 1 To adjust to the projected level of revenues to be generated by the proposed Project users and rates. 6 46X Forfeited Discounts 829 A- 1 To adjust to reflect going level increase in penalties as a function of increased water sales based on theproposed rates and charges. U ui-3- 7 904 Uncollectible Accounts 152 A-2 a, To adjust uncollectibles to 5% of proforma sales plus penalties. i-3 Q YW 8' 6XX Project Related Engineering Expenses 8,400 A-2 To adjust to reflect estimates of increases in expenses associated the proposed project provided by EL Robinson Engineers. P 0 U D STATEMENT H LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT - WATER UPPER LITTLE HARTS CREEK WATER EXTENSION PROJECT CASH FLOW ANALYSIS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2008 2008 GOING PER LEVEL GOING PROFORMA DESCRIPTION BOOKS ADJUSTMENTS LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS PROFORMA $ $ $ $ Available Cash: Operating income $ 4,444,093 $ (23,843)$ 4,420,250 $ 30,350 $ 4,450,601 Other Income 38,878 38,878 38,878 Total Available Cash 4,482,971 (23,843) 4,459,128 30,350 4,489,479 Cash Reauirements: 73 Operating Expenses 2,853,229 21,235 2,874,464 8,552 2,883,016 3 Project Loan Admin. fee U .5% a, Other Taxes 3 Q CT Total Cash Requirements Y before Debt Service 2,924,747 21,235 2,945,982 8,552 2,954,534 Cash Available for Debt Service (A) 1,558,224 (45,078) 1,513,146 21,799 1,534,944 Long-Term Debt Interest 396,023 (16,476) 379,547 379,547 Long-Term Debt Principal 720,967 720,967 720.967 Project Debt Service (P&l) 21,053 21,053 Total Debt Service (B) 1,116,990 (16,476) 1,100,514 21,053 1,121,567 Debt Service Reserve Funding 11 1,699 (31,531) 80.168 2.105 82.273~.~ ~ 0 Depreciation Reserve Funding 112.074 (596) 11 1,478 759 112,237 Surplus (Deficit) For Capital Additions 217,461 3,525 220,986 (2,119) 21 8,867 Capital Additions 184,626 184,626 184,626 Tank Painting Escrow Account OVERALL CASH SURPLUS (DEFICIT) 32,835 3,525 36,360 (2,119) 34,241 Percent of Coverage (A I B) 139.50% 137.49% 136.86% Maximum Debt Service 0 0 Yo REVENUE INCREASE -0.5% 0.7% AVERAGE BILL - 4,500GALLONS $ 37.22 $ 37.22 $ 37.22 PROPOSED RATE INCREASE 'Yo - 4,500GALLONS 0.0% 0.0% 090960sec06 1109.wpd PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON Entered by the PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA in the City of Charleston on the 1lth day of June 2009. CASE NO. 09-0960-PWD-CN LOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT Application for a certificate of convenience and necessity to construct upgrades to its water treatment facilities. NOTICE OF FILING On June 11, 2009, Logan County Public Service District (“District”) filed an application, duly verified, for a Certificate to construct certain additions and improvements to its water treatment facilities in Logan County. The application is on file with and available for public inspection at the Public Service Commission, 20 1 Brooks Street, in Charleston, West Virginia. The proposed project will provide potable water service to approximately 97 potential customers (“290 person”) in the Lincoln County communities of Little Hearts Creek, Harvey Fork, Mudlick Branch, Gartin Fork and Laurel Fork. The project will connect to an 8-inch main (“Atenville Water Project”) along County Route 68 and extended along County Routes 68 and 68/1 in easterly and southernly directions, respectively. Branch lines will be extended along County Routes 68/2,68/3 and 68/4. The proposed project consists of the construction of approximately 30,100 linear feet of 8- inch and smaller diameter water main, one 90 gallons per minute booster station, one 95,000 gallons storage tank, 20 fire hydrants, valves, meters and other related appurtenances. Water will be provided by the District’s Northern Regional Water Treatment Plant. The District estimates that the project costs will be approximately $2,710,000.00. It is proposed that the project will be financed by a Small Cities Block Grant of $1,500,000.00, Infrastructure Fund Grant of $410,000.00 and an Infrastructure Loan of $800,000 at zero percent interest for forty years. The District anticipates no change in the following current rates for its customers as a result of the project: Public Service Commission of West Virginia Charleston APPLICABILITY Applicable within the entire territory served. AVAILABILITY Available for general domestic, commercial, industrial and sale for resale water service. RATES (Customers with a metered water supply) First 2,000 gallons used per month $8.47 per 1,000 gallons Next 58,000 gallons used per month $8.1 1 per 1,000 gallons Next 240,000 gallons used per month $5.98 per 1,000 gallons All Over 300,000 gallons used per month $3.13 per 1,000 gallons MINIMUM CHARGE 5/8 inch meter $ 16.93 3/4 inch meter $ 25.40 1 inch meter $ 42.34 1 1/4 inch meter $ 61.82 1 1/2 inch meter $ 84.68 2 inch meter $ 135.52 3 inchmeter $ 254.06 4 inch meter $ 423.44 6 inch meter $ 848.47 8 inch meter $1,358.85 FLAT RATE CHARGE (customers with non-metered water supply) Equivalent of 4,500 gallons $37.19 DELAYED PAYMENT PENALTY The above schedule is net. On all accounts not paid in full when due, ten percent will be added to the net current amount unpaid. This delayed payment penalty is not interest and is to be collected only once for each bill where it is appropriate. TAP FEE The following charges are to be made whenever the utility installs a new tap to serve an applicant. A tap fee of $100.00 will be charged to customers applying for service before construction is completed adjacent to the customers premises in connection with a certificate proceeding before the Commission. This pre-construction tap fee will be invalid after the completion of construction adjacent to an applicant’s premises that is associated with a certificate proceeding. A tap fee of $250.00 will be charged to all customers who apply for service outside of a certificate proceeding before the Commission for each new tap to the system. Public Service Commission of West Virginia Charleston 2 RECONNECTION $20.00 To be charged whenever the supply of water is turned off for violations of rules, non- payment of bills, or fraudulent use of water. RETURNED CHECK CHARGE (effective on or after September 29,2006) A service charge equal to the actual bank fee assessed to the District or a maximum of $25.00 will be imposed upon any customer whose check for payment of charges is returned by their bank due to insufficient hnds. LEAK ADJUSTMENT $0.97 per 1,000 gallons is to be used when a bill reflects unusual consumption which can be attributed to eligible leakage on the customer’s side of the meter. This rate shall be applied to all such unusual consumption above the customer’s historical average usage. The requested rates and charges are only a proposal and are subject to change (increases or decreases) by the Public Service Commission in its review of this filing. Pursuant to W. Va. Code 524-2-1 1, IT IS ORDERED that Logan County Public Service District give notice of the filing of said application, by publishing a copy of this order once in a newspaper duly qualified by the Secretary of State, published and of general circulation in Mingo, Boone, Wyoming, Lincoln and Logan Counties, making due return to this Commission of proper certification of publication immediately after publication. Anyone desiring to protest or intervene should file a written protest or notice of intervention within 30 days following the date of this publication unless otherwise modified by Commission order. Failure to timely protest or intervene can affect your right to protest aspects of this certificate case, including any associated rate increases, or to participate in future proceedings. All protests or requests to intervene should briefly state the reason for the protest or intervention. Requests to intervene must comply with the Commission’s rules on intervention set forth in the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. All protests and interventions should be addressed to Sandra Squire, Executive Secretary, P. 0.Box 812, Charleston, West Virginia 25323. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if there is no substantial protest to the Application received within said thirty day period, the Commission may waive formal hearing and grant the application based on the evidence submitted with said application and its review thereof. S S/pjh 0 9 09 60s.wpd Public Service Commission of West Virginia Charleston 3