DOCSLIB.ORG

Guide to Good Practice in Core Area Development DFID Research Project R 6860 Jakarta Field Studies and Workshop DRAFT FINAL REPORT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guide to Good Practice in Core Area Development DFID Research Project R 6860 Jakarta Field Studies and Workshop DRAFT FINAL REPORT Guide to Good Practice in Core Area Development DFID Research Project R 6860 Jakarta Field Studies and Workshop DRAFT FINAL REPORT Compiled by: M. Theis, Tony Lloyd-Jones, W. Erickson Mark Povey, S.B Mulyawan, R. Kalra Submitted by: Max Lock Centre University of Westminster 35, Marylebone Road London. NW1 5LS and Centre for Urban and Regional Planning Studies Institute of Technology Bandung, Indonesia March 2000 The Max Lock Centre, University of Westminster, produced this report with the support of the Infrastructure and Urban Development Department (IUDD), British Government Department for International Development (DFID). The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the policy of DFID. © 2003 University of Westminster All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in any retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission of the copyright owners. Nevertheless, short excerpts may be reproduced without authorisation, on condition that the source is clearly indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, applications should be made to the copyright contacts given below. Contact address: Dr Mike Theis The Max Lock Centre Tony Lloyd-Jones School of Architecture and the Built Environment Bill Erickson University of Westminster Ripin Kalra 35 Marylebone Road London NW1 5LS Mark Povey United Kingdom Sarah Carmona Tel +44 (0) 20 7011 5000 ext 3131 Sugeng Budhi Mulyawan Fax +44 (0) 20 7911 5171 Haryo Winarso (research student at DPU Unit, UCL) Email: [email protected] Lucy Rudwiarti (research student at Oxford Brookes University) Jitender Chaudhary Website: http://www.wmin.ac.uk/builtenv/maxlock/ Chris Marsh Department for International Development Infrastructure, Health and Education No. 1 Palace Street London, SW1E 5 HE Design and layout by Max Lock Centre Printed by: The Max Lock Centre University of Westminster London, United Kingdom We would particularly like to thank the following for their contributions and advice The residents and community leaders of Karet Tengsin study area Prof. B.S. Kusbiantoro (Institute of Technology Bandung, Centre for Urban and Regional Planning Studies) and the research team: Benedictus Kombaitan Donny Prakoso Mangisi Irene Pangaribuan Akbar Trilo Miming Miharja Pitra Satvika Wilmar A. Salim Dovi Horas Hutapea (video recording) The many staff of the DKI Jakarta province, especially at the planning department (BAPEDDA). The participants at Focus Group Discussion at Karet Tengsin regency office on May 19th 1999 on the outcome of the field survey and a one-day Workshop held on May 26th 1999 at the Jakarta local government on the issues raised by the Jakarta Field Studies (see Appendix D for details). The research and survey team of Centre for Urban and Regional Planning Studies, Institute of Technology Bandung The CD on the inside of the front cover contains the complete report including Appendices Draft Final Report - March 2000 Jakarta field studies and workshop DFID Research project R6860 Guide to good practice in core area development Contents 1. Introduction.………………………………………………………………………. 1-1 2. Study methodology………………………………………………………………. 2-1 2.1 Project formulation and site identification…………………………………… 2-1 2.2 Project survey and data collection…………………………………………… 2-1 2.3 Project analysis and development options………………………………….. 2-1 3. Jakarta City and Metropolitan Region: a contextual overview……………3-1 3.1 The national planning background……………………………………………3-1 3.2 Indonesia land management.………………………………………….……... 3-4 3.3 Low-income housing policies………………………………………….………3-5 3.4 Jakarta: administration background…………………………………………..3-6 3.5 Jakarta: planning background………….…………………………………….. 3-7 3.6 Jakarta: land development……………………………………………………. 3-8 4. Identification of suitable sites in Jakarta……………………………………. 4-1 4.1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………….. 4-1 4.2 Site selection criteria………………………………………………………….. 4-1 4.3 The visited sites……………………………………………………………….. 4-1 4.4 The most suitable sites……………………………………………………….. 4-2 4.5 Sites in Bandung………………………………………………………………. 4-2 5. Selected sites : Karet Tengsin..………………………………………………... 5-1 5.1 Site background and general characteristics………………………………. 5-1 5.2 Administrative and planning background…………………………………….5-2 5.3 Physical description…………………………………………………………….5-8 5.4 The study and survey areas………………………………………………….. 5-8 5.5 Development plans, guidelines and proposals…………………………….. 5-15 6. Karet Tengsin : Socio-Economic Survey…..………………………………… 6-1 6.1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………….. 6-1 6.2 Survey methodology……………………………………………………………6-1 6.3 Karet Tengsin survey main findings…………………………………………. 6-1 6.3.1 Houses in multi-occupancy……………………………………………… 6-1 6.3.2 Age, sex and ethnic background……………………………………….. 6-6 6.3.3 Household type and relationship of members to the household head.6-6 6.3.4 Household size……………………………………………………………. 6-6 6.3.5 Employment and skills…………………………………………………….6-8 6.3.6 Travelling to work…………………………………………………………. 6-8 6.3.7 Land and property ownership…………………………………………… 6-10 6.3.8 Thoughts on moving from Karet Tengsin………………………………. 6-10 6.3.9 System of payment and average amount paid per month…………….6-11 6.3.10 Consumer goods observed in households…………………………… 6-13 6.3.11 Households heads: cost of rented accommodation………………….6-13 7. Karet Tengsin: analysis of development potential…………………………. 7-1 7.1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………...7-1 7.2 Aim………………………………………………………………………………. 7-1 7.3 Objective………………………………………………………………………... 7-1 7.4 Stakeholders…………………………………………………………………….7-1 7.5 Existing situation………………………………………………………………. 7-2 7.6 Local institutions………………………………………………………………. 7-2 7.6.1 Introduction……………………………………………………………….7-2 7.6.2 LKMD (Village Community Resilience Institution)……………………7-2 7.6.3 Rukun Warga (Harmonious Citizenry)……………………………….. 7-3 7.6.4 BPD (Local Village Assembly)………………………………………… 7-4 7.6.5 Conclusion………………………………………………………………. 7-4 Contents.doc i Draft Final Report - March 2000 Jakarta field studies and workshop DFID Research project R6860 Guide to good practice in core area development 7.7 Problem identification as the project development formulation approach. 7-7 7.7.1 General problems of the study area………………………………….. 7-7 7.7.2 Stakeholder identification and their problems……………………….. 7-8 7.7.3 SWOT analysis………………………………………………………….. 7-14 8. Development approaches of Karet Tengsin ………………………………....8-1 8.1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………….. 8-1 8.2 Do nothing scenario…………………………………………………………….8.1 8.3 Local government statutory plan scenario…………………………………...8-3 8.4 Clean sweep scheme scenario…………………………………………..…... 8-5 8.5 Incremental development and partnership scenario…………………..…… 8-6 8.6 Conclusion………………………………………………………………..…….. 8-7 References………………………………………………………………………………9-1 Appendix A. Flat survey in central of Jakarta ……………………………………A-1 Rusun Development…………………………………………………………………. A-2 Penjaringan flats…..…………………………………………………………………. A-2 Kebon Kacang flats..…………………………………………………………………. A-2 Tanah Abang flats….………………………………………………………………….A-3 Appendix B. Statutory planning code used as development control in 1:1000 mapping and the land use abbreviation…………….. B-1 Appendix C. Proposed study sites …………………………………………….…. C-1 Kemayoran….…………………………………………………………………………. C-2 Manggarai….…………………………………………………………………………. C-2 Sunda Kelapa….……………………………………………………………………… C-3 Pademangan….………………………………………………………………………. C-3 Jatinegara….…………………………………………………………………………. C-3 Karet Tengsin….……………………………………………………………………… C-4 Appendix D. Sample household interview survey tabulation……..………….. D-1 Table 1: Karet Tengsin: Age Groups %……………………………………………..D-2 Table 2: Karet Tengsin: Type of Household: Sample Number and %………….. D-3 Table 3: Karet Tengsin: Relationship to Household Head: Sample Number and % ……………………………………………………………………….. D-5 Table 4: Karet Tengsin: Size of Household: Sample Number and %……………D-6 Table 5: Karet Tengsin: Work location, travel cost and time: % of those in employment …… D-7 Table 6: Karet Tengsin: Type of Work Activity: Sample Number and %………. D-9 Table 7: Karet Tengsin: Employment Type: Sample Number and %………….. D-9 Table 8: Karet Tengsin: System of payment: Sample Number and %…………. D-10 Table 9: Karet Tengsin: Average amount of payment per month: Sample Number and %………………………………………………………D-10 Table 10: Karet Tengsin: Household heads: Consumer Goods: Sample Number and …………………………………………………….. D-11 Table 11: Karet Tengsin: Household Heads: Ethnic Group: Sample Number and %………………………………………………….. D-12 Table 12: Karet Tengsin: Household Heads: Tenure Type: Sample Number and % …………………………………………………..D-12 Table 13: Karet Tengsin: Household Heads: Cost if Rented: Sample Number and %…………………………………………………...D-13 Contents.doc ii Draft Final Report - March 2000 Jakarta field studies and workshop DFID Research project R6860 Guide to good practice in core area development Table 14: Karet Tengsin: Household Heads: How long resident: Sample Number and % …………………………………………………..D-13 Table 15: Karet Tengsin: Household Heads: Would you like to ..?: Sample Number and %…………………………………………………...D-14 Table 16: Karet Tengsin: Household Heads: How long resident by tenure: %… D-15 Table 17: Karet Tengsin: Household Heads: Intentions by tenure: %…………. D-16 Appendix E. Transcripts of Karet Tengsin video interviews..…………….…. E-1 Tape 1.…………………………………………………………………………………. E-2 Tape 2…..….……..…………………………………………………………………….E-10 Glossary of place names..……………………………………………………………
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LIST of ATTORNEYS the U.S. Embassy Jakarta, Indonesia
    Page 1 of 12 LIST OF ATTORNEYS The U.S. Embassy Jakarta, Indonesia assumes no responsibility or liability for the professional ability or reputation of, or the quality of services provided by, the following persons or firms. Inclusion on this list is in no way an endorsement by the Department of State or the U.S. Embassy/Consulate. Names are listed alphabetically, and the order in which they appear has no other significance. The information in the list on professional credentials, areas of expertise and language ability are provided directly by the lawyers. AFDHAL & DEDY LAW FIRM Address: Jl. KS Tubun III No. 20, Slipi, Jakarta Barat 11410 Telephone: (62-21) 5306885, Afdhal Muhammad +62 81381530266 or +62 87877823300; Fax: +62 21 53652210. E-mail: [email protected] ANDRYAWAL SIMANJUNTAK & PARTNERS Address: Komplek. Kejaksaan Agung, Blok : A1 No. 23, JL. Cipunagara I, Ciputat 15411. Telephone: (62-21) 99560888, (62)81399960888; Web site: www.andryawal.blogspot.com E-mail : [email protected] Expertise: This law firm’s area practice include litigation, non litigation, bankruptcy, corporate, commercial, labour, capital & finance, banking, criminal law, family law, administration law, immigration, foreign investment, land matter. ARMILA & RAKO Address: Suite 12-C, 12th Floor, Lippo Kuningan, Jl. H.R. Rasuna Said Kav.12, Jakarta 12920 Telephone: +62 21 2911 0015; Mobile +62 811 935503; Fax: +62 21 2911 0016 Contact person: Michel A. Rako, e-maill: [email protected] List of membership: - Co-Chairman Commercial Law Commission of International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Indonesia - Vice Secretary General of the Indonesian Academy of Independent Mediators and Arbitrators (MedArbId) - Member of Indonesian BAR Association (PERADI) Expertise: Litigation and Dispute Resolution, Mining and Energy,Corporate and Commercial, Merger and Acquisition, Foreign Investment, Employment, Intellectual Property Rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Penentuan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Pemilihan Park & Ride Sebagai Fasilitas Pergerakan Komuter Pada Koridor Bekasi-Jakarta
    TUGAS AKHIR – RP141501 PENENTUAN FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI PEMILIHAN PARK & RIDE SEBAGAI FASILITAS PERGERAKAN KOMUTER PADA KORIDOR BEKASI-JAKARTA MOHAMAD FARIDZ NAZALAPUTRA 3612 100 056 Dosen Pembimbing Ketut Dewi Martha Erli Handayeni, ST., MT JURUSAN PERENCANAAN WILAYAH DAN KOTA Fakultas Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya 2017 FINAL PROJECT – RP141501 DETERMINING THE FACTOR OF PARK & RIDE CHOOSEN FOR COMMUTERS MOBILITY FACILITIES IN CORRIDORS OF BEKASI-JAKARTA MOHAMAD FARIDZ NAZALAPUTRA 3612 100 056 Advisor Ketut Dewi Martha Erli Handayeni, ST., MT. DEPARTMENT OF URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology Surabaya 2017 ii LEMBAR PENGESAHAN PENENTUAN FAKTOR-FAKTOR PEMILIHAN PARK & RIDE SEBAGAI FASILITAS PERGERAKAN KOMUTER PADA KORIDOR BEKASI-JAKARTA Nama Mahasiswa : Mohamad Faridz Nazalaputra NRP : 3612100056 Jurusan : Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota Dosen Pembimbing : Ketut Dewi Martha Erli Handayeni, ST., MT. ABSTRAK Setiap hari penduduk di DKI Jakarta bertambah hingga 1.382.296 jiwa pada siang hari. Kota Bekasi menyumbang jumlah komuter terbanyak di DKI Jakarta yaitu sebanyak 460.069 jiwa. Kereta rel listrik (KRL) merupakan moda transportasi yang cukup efisien untuk melayani pergerakan komuter di Koridor Bekasi-Jakarta. Sebanyak 31.373 memilih KRL sebagai moda transportasi pergerakan, namun pergerakan dari Kota Bekasi menuju DKI Jakarta masih didominasi oleh pengguna kendaraan pribadi yaitu sebesar 331.244 jiwa. Park & ride merupakan sebuah fasilitas penunjang moda transportasi KRL yang dapat mengalihkan pengguna pribadi untuk menggunakan moda transportasi KRL. Dalam optimalisasi fasilitas park & ride, perlu dilakukan penelitian untuk mencari faktor- faktor yang mempengaruhi penggunaan park & ride pada Koridor Bekasi- Jakarta. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah menentukan faktor – faktor yang mempengaruhi penggunaan park and ride untuk mendorong komuter menggunakan KRL koridor Bekasi – Jakarta.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Cakung Polder
    Public Disclosure Authorized Final Report – phase 2 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized December 2014 FHM – Technical review and support Jakarta Flood Management System Including Sunter, Cakung, Marunda and upper Cideng Ciliwung diversions and Cisadane Technical review and support Jakarta Flood Management System Final Report - phase 2 © Deltares, 2014 December 2014, Final Report - Phase 2 Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Introduction to the project 2 1.3 Polder systems 2 1.4 Project Tasks 4 1.5 Report outline 5 2 Kamal / Tanjungan polder 7 2.1 Description of the area 7 2.2 Pump scheme alternatives 8 2.2.1 A1 – Kamal and Tanjungan as separate systems, no additional storage 9 2.2.2 A2 – Combined Kamal and Tanjungan system, storage reservoir 45 ha 12 2.2.3 A3 – Kamal-Tanjungan with 90 ha storage 14 2.3 Verification with the hydraulic model and JEDI Synchronization 15 2.3.1 Introduction 15 2.3.2 Results 16 2.3.3 Impact of creation of western lake NCICD 18 2.4 Synchronization with other hydraulic infrastructure 19 3 Lower Angke / Karang polder 20 3.1 Description of the area 20 3.2 Pump scheme alternatives 21 3.2.1 B1 – Lower Angke/Karang, no additional storage 22 3.2.2 B2A – Lower Angke/Karang, new reservoir at Lower Angke 23 3.2.3 B2B – Lower Angke/Karang, 30 ha waduk and 12 ha emergency storage 25 3.2.4 B3 – as B2B, but with all possible green area as emergency storage 27 3.2.5 B4 –Splitting the polder in two parts, no additional storage 29 3.2.6 B5 –Splitting the polder area
    [Show full text]
  • Reflection Paper.Indd
    kampung kitchen Sustaining the livelihoods of the local kampong residents through the informalities of their community within the colonial city center Refl ection Paper Amy A. Cotino Stud. no. 4363752 Index Shared Heritage 3 1. Design Problem Statement 4 2. Value Assessment in Relation to Site & Topic 5 3. Opportunities, Obligations & Dilemmas in the Design Process & Product 7 References 10 2 Shared Heritage Shared heritage can be perceived as heritage architecture of that region and architectural shared by two or more entities such as individuals, movements originating from diff erent countries. institutions or countries. This shared heritage A perfect example was that of the Dutch comprises of a history of, for example, past events, architect and town planner Thomas Karsten built structures and infused cultures in which the (1884-1945). With an educational background entities share. Within this context, the Shared from the Delft Polytechnic, he took along with Heritage Studio aims to explore the historic him the concepts from prominent architects, centres of Indonesian cities with a shared Dutch such as Berlage, and design approaches, such as past, in order to fi nd out if heritage can be used Deutscher Werkbund1, and expressed these in the as a sustainable driver to solve current societal Dutch East Indies in his town planning schemes problems. and architecture (Coté & O’Neill, 2017). Shared heritage can be used as a In shared heritage, one cannot exist means to grow a stronger relationship in order without the other. The values preserved from this to work together towards a meaningful future. past need to serve a wider societal problem in Furthermore, heritage value can never truly order for it to be conserved, and must therefore be one’s own, depending to which extent one be reinterpreted through added value in the claims it.
    [Show full text]
  • Nama Sekolah Jumlah Anak Penerima KJP SDN ANCOL 01 PG. 323 SDN ANCOL 03 PG. 210 SDN ANCOL 04 PT. 163 SDN ANGKE 01 PG. 375 SDN AN
    Nama Sekolah Jumlah Anak Penerima KJP SD SDN ANCOL 01 PG. 323 SDN ANCOL 03 PG. 210 SDN ANCOL 04 PT. 163 SDN ANGKE 01 PG. 375 SDN ANGKE 03 PG. 72 SDN ANGKE 04 PT. 134 SDN ANGKE 05 PG. 79 SDN ANGKE 06 PG. 238 SDN BALE KAMBANG 01 PG. 138 SDN BALE KAMBANG 03 PG. 171 SDN BALIMESTER 01 PG. 69 SDN BALIMESTER 02 PT. 218 SDN BALIMESTER 03 PT. 274 SDN BALIMESTER 06 PG. 65 SDN BALIMESTER 07 PT. 110 SDN BAMBU APUS 01 PG. 84 SDN BAMBU APUS 02 PG. 92 SDN BAMBU APUS 03 PG. 283 SDN BAMBU APUS 04 PG. 79 SDN BAMBU APUS 05 PG. 89 SDN BANGKA 01 PG. 95 SDN BANGKA 03 PG. 96 SDN BANGKA 05 PG. 60 SDN BANGKA 06 PG. 42 SDN BANGKA 07 PG. 103 SDN BARU 01 PG. 10 SDN BARU 02 PG. 46 SDN BARU 03 PG. 124 SDN BARU 05 PG. 128 SDN BARU 06 PG. 107 SDN BARU 07 PG. 20 SDN BARU 08 PG. 163 SDN BATU AMPAR 01 PG. 24 SDN BATU AMPAR 02 PG. 100 SDN BATU AMPAR 03 PG. 81 SDN BATU AMPAR 05 PG. 61 SDN BATU AMPAR 06 PG. 113 SDN BATU AMPAR 07 PG. 108 SDN BATU AMPAR 08 PG. 66 SDN BATU AMPAR 09 PG. 95 SDN BATU AMPAR 10 PG. 111 SDN BATU AMPAR 11 PG. 91 SDN BATU AMPAR 12 PG. 64 SDN BATU AMPAR 13 PG. 38 SDN BENDUNGAN HILIR 01 PG. 144 SDN BENDUNGAN HILIR 02 PT. 92 SDN BENDUNGAN HILIR 03 PG.
    [Show full text]
  • Jumlah Puskesmas Menurut Kabupaten/Kota (Keadaan 31 Desember 2013)
    JUMLAH PUSKESMAS MENURUT KABUPATEN/KOTA (KEADAAN 31 DESEMBER 2013) PROVINSI DKI JAKARTA KODE KAB/KOTA RAWAT INAP NON RAWAT INAP JUMLAH 3101 KAB. ADM. KEPULAUAN SERIBU 1 7 8 3171 KOTA ADM. JAKARTA SELATAN 8 70 78 3172 KOTA ADM. JAKARTA TIMUR 5 83 88 3173 KOTA ADM. JAKARTA PUSAT 3 39 42 3174 KOTA ADM. JAKARTA BARAT 8 67 75 3175 KOTA ADM. JAKARTA UTARA 5 44 49 JUMLAH 30 310 340 P JENIS O WILAYAH KERJA KODE PUSKESMAS NO PROVINSI KABUPATEN/KOTA NAMA PUSKESMAS ALAMAT PUSKESMAS N PUSKESMAS Rawat Non Rawat Luas Jumlah E Desa D Inap Inap Wilayah Penduduk KEC. KEP. SERIBU 2.459 DKI Jakarta Kab. Kep. Seribu P3101010201 SELATAN Dermaga Pulau Tidung, Kec. Kep. Seribu Selatan V 0 1 2.460 DKI Jakarta Kab. Kep. Seribu P3101010202 KEL. PULAU TIDUNG Dermaga Pulau Tidung, Kec. Kep. Seribu Selatan 0 1 2.461 DKI Jakarta Kab. Kep. Seribu P3101010203 KEL. P. UNTUNG JAWA Bogenville, Kec. Kep. Seribu Selatan 0 1 2.462 DKI Jakarta Kab. Kep. Seribu P3101010204 KEL. PULAU PARI Pulau Lancang, Kec. Kep. Seribu Selatan 0 1 2.463 DKI Jakarta Kab. Kep. Seribu P3101020102 KEL. PULAU KELAPA Kel. Pulau Kelapa, Kec. Kep. Seribu Utara 1 0 KEC. KEP. SERIBU 2.464 DKI Jakarta Kab. Kep. Seribu P3101020201 UTARA/RB Dermaga Pulau Kelapa, Kec. Kep. Seribu Utara 0 1 2.465 DKI Jakarta Kab. Kep. Seribu P3101020203 KEL. PULAU PANGGANG Kel. Pulau Panggang, Kec. Kep. Seribu Utara 0 1 2.466 DKI Jakarta Kab. Kep. Seribu P3101020204 KEL. PULAU HARAPAN Kel. Pulau Harapan, Kec. Kep.
    [Show full text]
  • Kodesumur Pemilik Alamat Province Id Regency Id District Id Village Id Latitude Longitude Jenis Status Foto Ketinggian Last Update Mat
    kodesumur pemilik alamat province_id regency_id district_id village_id latitude longitude jenis status foto ketinggian last_update mat Kantor Walikota Balai Jakarta 3171, KOTA 3171060, 3171060004, 22/06/20 - 31710600045001 Konservasi Selatan, Jalan 31, DKI JAKARTA JAKARTA KEBAYORAN -6,25 106,81 Pantau Aktif 0 PETOGOGAN 12.48.14 23,57 Air Tanah Prapanca SELATAN BARU Raya No.9, RT.1/RW.1 Kantor Urusan Agama Kecamatan Balai Kosambi, 3603, 3603210, 3603210010, 31/03/21 36711000115001 Konservasi Jalan Raya 36, BANTEN KABUPATEN -6,07 106,67 Pantau Aktif 0 -3,20 KOSAMBI SALEMBARAN 17.07.35 Air Tanah Selembaran TANGERANG Jaya, Kec Kosambi, Tangerang, Banten Kantor Desa Bunibakti, Balai 3216, Kecamatan 3216090, 3216090006, 01/04/21 - 32160900065001 Konservasi 32, JAWA BARAT KABUPATEN -6,11 107,04 Pantau Aktif 0 Babelan, BABELAN BUNIBAKTI 01.21.43 20,33 Air Tanah BEKASI Kabupaten Bekasi Perumahan Balai Magnolia, 3174, KOTA 3174010, 3174010001, 31/10/20 - 31740100015001 Konservasi Jalan Joglo 31, DKI JAKARTA JAKARTA -6,22 106,74 Pantau Aktif 0 KEMBANGAN JOGLO 07.04.37 16,75 Air Tanah Raya, BARAT RT.7/RW.8 Kawasan Berikat PT Freetrend, Balai Jalan 3603, 3603130, 3603130004, 01/01/00 36030100011 Konservasi Unggul, Desa 36, BANTEN KABUPATEN -6,21 106,46 Pantau Perbaikan 0 0,00 BALARAJA SENTUL JAYA 10.32.17 Air Tanah Sentul TANGERANG Balaraja, Tangerang, Banten Kantor Kelurahan Kebalen, Balai 3216, Jalan 3216090, 3216090002, 02/12/19 - 32160900025001 Konservasi 32, JAWA BARAT KABUPATEN -6,20 107,04 Pantau Aktif 0 Perjuangan BABELAN KEBALEN 13.18.45 19,57 Air Tanah BEKASI Km. 7 No.1, Babelan, Bekasi Kantor BKAT Jalan Balai 3175, KOTA Tongkol no.
    [Show full text]
  • Kode Dan Data Wilayah Administrasi Pemerintahan Provinsi Dki Jakarta
    KODE DAN DATA WILAYAH ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN PROVINSI DKI JAKARTA JUMLAH N A M A / J U M L A H LUAS JUMLAH NAMA PROVINSI / K O D E WILAYAH PENDUDUK K E T E R A N G A N (Jiwa) **) KABUPATEN / KOTA KAB KOTA KECAMATAN KELURAHAN D E S A (Km2) 31 DKI JAKARTA 31.01 1 KAB. ADM. KEP. SERIBU 2 6 - 10,18 21.018 31.01.01 1 Kepulauan Seribu 3 - Utara 31.01.01.1001 1 Pulau Panggang 31.01.01.1002 2 Pulau Kelapa 31.01.01.1003 3 Pulau Harapan 31.01.02 2 Kepulauan Seribu 3 - Selatan. 31.01.02.1001 1 Pulau Tidung 31.01.02.1002 2 Pulau Pari 31.01.02.1003 3 Pulau Untung Jawa 31.71 2 KODYA JAKARTA PUSAT 8 44 - 52,38 792.407 31.71.01 1 Gambir 6 - 31.71.01.1001 1 Gambir 31.71.01.1002 2 Cideng 31.71.01.1003 3 Petojo Utara 31.71.01.1004 4 Petojo Selatan 31.71.01.1005 5 Kebon Pala 31.71.01.1006 6 Duri Pulo 31.71.02 2 Sawah Besar 5 - 31.71.02.1001 1 Pasar Baru 31.71.02.1002 2 Karang Anyar 31.71.02.1003 3 Kartini 31.71.02.1004 4 Gunung Sahari Utara 31.71.02.1005 5 Mangga Dua Selatan 31.71.03 3 Kemayoran 8 - 31.71.03.1001 1 Kemayoran 31.71.03.1002 2 Kebon Kosong 31.71.03.1003 3 Harapan Mulia 31.71.03.1004 4 Serdang 1 N A M A / J U M L A H LUAS JUMLAH NAMA PROVINSI / JUMLAH WILAYAH PENDUDUK K E T E R A N G A N K O D E KABUPATEN / KOTA KAB KOTA KECAMATAN KELURAHAN D E S A (Km2) (Jiwa) **) 31.71.03.1005 5 Gunung Sahari Selatan 31.71.03.1006 6 Cempaka Baru 31.71.03.1007 7 Sumur Batu 31.71.03.1008 8 Utan Panjang 31.71.04 4 Senen 6 - 31.71.04.1001 1 Senen 31.71.04.1002 2 Kenari 31.71.04.1003 3 Paseban 31.71.04.1004 4 Kramat 31.71.04.1005 5 Kwitang 31.71.04.1006 6 Bungur
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Living in Southeast Asia
    Appreciating Asian modern : mASEANa Project 2015-2020 mASEANa Project 2017 modern living in Southeast Asia The Report of mASEANa Project 2017 4th & 5th International Conference 2015 - 2020 The Report of mASEANa project 2017 : 4th & 5th International Conference modern living in Southeast Asia Introduction Why Are We So Interested in modern architecture in Asia? -The Story behind mASEANa Project 2015-20 and a Report on its Fiscal 2017 Activities- Shin Muramatsu 09 The Housing Question Ana Tostões 11 CONTENTS Part1: modern living in Southeast Asia Part2: Inventory of modern Buildings modern living in Southeast Asia - Inventory of modern Buildings in Yangon - Setiadi Sopandi, Kengo Hayashi 16 History of modern architecture in Yangon Friedrich Silaban Inventory & Research, 2006-2018 Win Thant Win Shwin, Su Su 65 Setiadi Sopandi 18 Inventory of modern Buildings in Yangon 67 - 1. Sports and Modern Urbanisim - - Inventory of modern Buildings in Jakarta - The Role of Sports Facilities in Metro Manila’s Urban Living from the 1930s to 1970s History of modern architecture in Jakarta Gabriel Victor Caballero 22 Setiadi Sopandi, Nadia Purwestri 77 The Shape of Sports Diplomacy: Inventory of modern Buildings in Jakarta 79 Gelora Bung Karno, Jakarta, and the Fourth Asian Games Robin Hartanto 26 Modern Architecture Literacy Development: The mASEANa Project in 2017 Kengo Hayashi 88 PHNOM PENH 1964: Architecture and Urbanism of GANEFO Masaaki Iwamoto 30 Transformation of modern Living in Japan after WWII: Washington Heights, Tokyo Olympic and Yoyogi Sports Complex Saikaku Toyokawa 34 Acknowledgment 92 - 2. Modern Projects, Changing Lifestyles, Resilience - Living in KTTs – the Formation of Modern Community in Vietnam Pham Thuy Loan, Truong Ngoc Lan, Nguyen Manh Tri 36 Pulomas: A Social Housing Project which Never Was Mohammad Nanda Widyarta 40 Modernization of Tatami, Shoji, & En Yasuko Kamei 44 Collective Housing in Japan Toshio Otsuki 48 - 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Perseroan”) (” the Company”)
    PEMANGGILAN INVITATION RAPAT UMUM PEMEGANG SAHAM ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF TAHUNAN SHAREHOLDERS. PT. TEMBAGA MULIA SEMANAN, Tbk. PT. TEMBAGA MULIA SEMANAN, Tbk. (“Perseroan”) (” The Company”) Direksi Perseroan dengan ini mengundang The Board of Directors of the Company hereby Para Pemegang Saham Perseroan untuk invites Shareholders of the Company to attend menghadiri Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham the Company’s Annual General Meeting of Tahunan Perseroan (“Rapat”) yang akan Shareholders (“Meeting”) , which will be held on: diselenggarakan pada : Hari / Tanggal : Kamis, 10 Juni 2021 Day / Date : Thursday, June 10, 2021 J a m : 10.00 WIB Time : 10.00 AM Western Indonesia Time Tempat : Kantor PT Tembaga Mulia Venue : Office of PT Tembaga Mulia Semanan Tbk Semanan Tbk Jalan Daan Mogot Km. 16, Jalan Daan Mogot Km. 16, Kalideres, Jakarta Barat Kalideres, West Jakarta 11850 11850 dengan Mata Rapat sebagai berikut : with the following agenda : 1. Persetujuan Laporan Tahunan, 1. Approval of the Annual Report, termasuk Laporan Pelaksanaan Tugas including Supervisory Task Report of Pengawasan Dewan Komisaris the Board of Commissioners of the Perseroan untuk tahun buku yang Company for the financial year ended st berakhir pada tanggal 31 Desember December 31 , 2020 and Ratification of 2020 dan Pengesahan atas Laporan the Financial Report of the Company for the financial year ended December Keuangan Perseroan untuk tahun buku 31st, 2020. yang berakhir pada tanggal 31 Desember 2020. Berdasarkan Pasal 69 dan Pasal 78 Pursuant to Article 69 and Article 78
    [Show full text]
  • (Kancil) Pondok Cina Dalam Memelihara Ekologi Sungai Ciliwung
    PERAN KOMUNITAS ANAK KALI CILIWUNG (KANCIL) PONDOK CINA DALAM MEMELIHARA EKOLOGI SUNGAI CILIWUNG Skripsi Diajukan untuk memenuhi persyaratan memperoleh gelar Sarjana Sosial (S.Sos) Oleh Abdul Rahman NIM : 1113054000030 JURUSAN PENGEMBANGAN MASYARAKAT ISLAM FAKULTAS ILMU DAKWAH DAN ILMU KOMUNIKASI UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI (UIN) SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA 1441 H/2019 ABSTRAK ABDUL RAHMAN Peran Komunitas Anak Ciliwung (KANCIL) Pondok Cina Dalam Memelihara Ekologi Sungai Ciliwung. Dosen Pembimbing: Dr. Tantang Hermansah, M.Si Komunitas Anak Ciliwung (Kancil) memiliki peran penting dalam menjaga kesehatan lingkungan sungai Ciliwung wilayah Depok. Kali Ciliwung telah berubah menjadi salah satu wilayah ekowisata bagi Kota Depok berkat kerjasama antara Kancil dengan beberapa instansi serta masyarakat dalam menjaga ekologi sungai. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana peran Kancil dalam memelihara ekologi di wilayah Sungai Ciliwung Pondok Cina serta mengetahui faktor penghambat dan faktor pendukung Kancil dalam meliharaan ekologi di wilayah Sungai Ciliwung Pondok Cina. Dengan rumusan masalah (1) bagaimana peran Kancil dalam memelihara ekologi di wilayah Sungai Ciliwung Pondok Cina?, (2) Apa faktor penghambat dan faktor pendukung Kancil dalam meliharaan ekologi di wilayah Sungai Ciliwung Pondok Cina?. Metodologi yang digunakan pada penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Dengan analisis deskriptif yang didapatkan dari data-data yang telah berhasil diolah secara sistematis baik berupa kata-kata, tertulis atau lisan dari orang yang dapat diamati. Subjek penelitian ini adalah Kancil. Hasil studi menemukan bahwa peran komunitas yang dilakukan oleh Kancil yang berfokus pada peran dalam memelihara ekologi sungai ketika mereka melakukan semangat sosial, mediator dan negosiator, dukungan, pengorganisir dapat melakukan perubahan diwilayahnya. Faktor pendukung keaktifan anggota, partisipasi masyarakat, solidaritas dan aparatur RT/RW serta kelurahan.
    [Show full text]
  • Tugas Akhir Skripsi
    TUGAS AKHIR SKRIPSI IDENTIFIKASI FASAD ARSITEKTUR TROPIS PADA GEDUNG-GEDUNG MINIMALIS PERKANTORAN SEPANJANG JALAN JENDERAL SUDIRMAN, JAKARTA Studi kasus pada Koridor Dukuh Atas-Semanggi Diajukan sebagai Pelengkap dan Syarat Guna Mencapai Gelar Sarjana Teknik Arsitektur Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta Disusun Oleh : NAMA : Anwari Dananjaya NIM : D300 970 064 JURUSAN TEKNIK ARSITEKTUR FAKULTAS TEKNIK UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA 2009 BAB I PENDAHULUAN 1. Latar Belakang 1.1 Jalan Jenderal Sudirman Gb. 1. Jalan Jenderal Sudirman Jalan Protokol Jenderal Sudirman di Jakarta adalah sebuah jalan protokol yang menjadi salah satu landmark ibukota Republik Indonesia. Ruas jalan jenderal Sudirman (JendSud) memanjang sesuai arah mata angin dari Utara ke Selatan, di sebelah Utara ditandai oleh sebuah landmark, lahan air mancur dengan monumen patung (sculpture) 1 bertema tugu Selamat Datang, yang terkenal dengan sebutan Air Mancur Bundaran H.I. Gb. 2. Bundaran H.I. 1 Pada awalnya landmark bundaran H.I ini memiliki bangunan Hotel Indonesia yang dirancang insinyur Soekarno (Presiden RI #1) pada tahun 1959 di sebelah baratdaya , kini semakin bertambah bangunan yang berada di sekitarnya mengambil view Bundaran H.I. sebagai Point of Interest Jalan Jenderal Sudirman di Bundaran Hotel Indonesia terletak di Kotamadya Jakarta Pusat tepatnya di Kecamatan Menteng, dan dikelilingi oleh 4 kelurahan sekaligus yaitu Kelurahan Menteng, Gondangdia, KebonKacang, dan Kebon Melati Di sebelah Selatan jalan protokol ini dibatasi oleh landmark Air Mancur Bundaran Senayan, yang menjadi meeting point 4 koridor jalan utama yang lain yang ada di wilayah senayan. Batas selatan JendSud di Bundaran Senayan terletak di Kotamadya Jakarta Selatan tepatnya di Kecamatan Kebayoran Baru, dan dikelilingi oleh Kelurahan Senayan, Gelora, Selong, dan Kelurahan Gunung Gb.
    [Show full text]