DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Impact Analysis for the Proposed Designation of Critical Habitat for Beringia DPS Bearded Seals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Impact Analysis for the Proposed Designation of Critical Habitat for Beringia DPS Bearded Seals Draft RIR/ESA Section 4(b)(2) Preparatory Assessment/IRFA of Critical Habitat Designation for the Beringia Distinct Population Segment (DPS) of the Bearded Seal December 2020 NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE Alaska Region Draft RIR/4(b)(2) Preparatory Assessment/IRFA of Critical Habitat Designation for the Beringia DPS of the Bearded Seal Table of Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Listing and Critical Habitat Designation Background ....................................................... 1-1 1.2 Purpose and Need............................................................................................................ 1-2 1.3 Objectives ......................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.4 Regulatory Impact Requirements ..................................................................................... 1-3 1.4.1 Requirements of Regulatory Impact Review .................................................... 1-3 1.4.2 Requirements of Section 4(b)(2) of the ESA .................................................... 1-4 1.4.3 Requirements of Regulatory Flexibility Act ....................................................... 1-4 1.5 Description of Critical Habitat Designation Alternatives ................................................... 1-5 1.6 Structure of the Report ..................................................................................................... 1-5 2 Methodology and Framework for Analysis ..................................................................2-1 2.1 General Framework for the Analysis ................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Categories of Potential Economic Effects of Critical Habitat Designation ....................... 2-1 2.2.1 Efficiency Effects ............................................................................................... 2-2 2.2.2 Net Benefits ....................................................................................................... 2-3 2.2.3 Distributional and Regional Economic Effects .................................................. 2-3 2.3 Framework for Estimating Benefits .................................................................................. 2-4 2.3.1 Benefit Valuation Methods ................................................................................ 2-5 2.4 Baseline and Incremental Effects ..................................................................................... 2-6 2.4.1 Baseline for the Analysis ................................................................................... 2-6 2.4.2 Types of Economic Costs and Benefits of Critical Habitat Designation ........... 2-7 2.5 Analytic Time-Frame ........................................................................................................ 2-9 2.6 Potentially Affected Economic Sectors and Groups ......................................................... 2-9 2.7 Information Sources ....................................................................................................... 2-10 3 Types of Economic Costs of Critical Habitat Designation .........................................3-1 3.1 Direct Costs ...................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Administrative Section 7 Consultation Costs .................................................... 3-1 3.1.2 Section 7 Project Modification Costs ................................................................ 3-2 3.2 Indirect Costs .................................................................................................................... 3-3 3.2.1 Other State and Local Laws (Trigger Effects) ................................................... 3-3 3.2.2 Time Delays ...................................................................................................... 3-4 3.2.3 Regulatory Uncertainty ..................................................................................... 3-4 4 Types of Economic Benefits of Beringia DPS Critical Habitat Designation ..............4-1 4.1 Categories of Beringia DPS Critical Habitat Benefits ....................................................... 4-1 4.2 Use Benefits ..................................................................................................................... 4-2 4.2.1 Direct Use Benefits ........................................................................................... 4-3 4.3 Nonuse or Passive Use Benefits ...................................................................................... 4-7 4.4 Summary ........................................................................................................................ 4-10 5 Contextual Information .................................................................................................5-1 5.1 Geographic Scope (Study Area) ...................................................................................... 5-1 December 2020 i Table of Contents This information is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination review under applicable Information Quality Guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by NOAA. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or policy. Draft RIR/4(b)(2) Preparatory Assessment/IRFA of Critical Habitat Designation for the Beringia DPS of the Bearded Seal 5.2 Description of Affected Economies .................................................................................. 5-1 5.2.1 Population Trends and Projections ................................................................... 5-1 5.2.2 Race and Ethnicity ............................................................................................ 5-4 5.2.3 Alaska Native Corporations and Communities ................................................. 5-4 5.2.4 Income-Related Measures of Social Well-Being .............................................. 5-6 5.2.5 Major Economic Sectors ................................................................................... 5-7 5.3 Regulatory Baseline ....................................................................................................... 5-19 5.3.1 Federal ............................................................................................................ 5-19 5.3.2 State Regulations ............................................................................................ 5-23 5.4 Current and Projected Economic and Social Activity ..................................................... 5-25 5.4.1 Oil and Gas Exploration, Development, and Production ................................ 5-25 5.4.2 Mining .............................................................................................................. 5-36 5.4.3 Ports and Coastal Construction ...................................................................... 5-37 5.4.4 Commercial Fisheries ..................................................................................... 5-38 5.4.5 Alaska Native Subsistence Use and Personal Use ........................................ 5-41 5.4.6 Recreation and Tourism .................................................................................. 5-46 5.4.7 Commercial Shipping and Marine Transportation .......................................... 5-47 5.4.8 Military Activities .............................................................................................. 5-49 5.4.9 Interactions between Bearded Seal Habitats and other Protected Species and their Habitats ............................................................................................ 5-51 5.4.10 Educational, Scientific, Non-Consumptive Use of the Beringia DPS and its Habitat ............................................................................................................. 5-52 5.5 Summary and Projected Number of Future Actions that May Affect Beringia DPS Critical Habitat ................................................................................................................ 5-53 6 Costs and Benefits of Beringia DPS Critical Habitat Designation .............................6-1 6.1 Oil and Gas Exploration, Development, and Production .................................................. 6-2 6.1.1 Potential Costs to Oil and Gas .......................................................................... 6-2 6.1.2 Potential Benefits to Oil and Gas ...................................................................... 6-3 6.2 Mining ............................................................................................................................... 6-3 6.2.1 Potential Costs to Mining .................................................................................. 6-3 6.2.2 Potential Benefits to Mining .............................................................................. 6-3 6.3 Ports and Coastal Construction ........................................................................................ 6-3 6.3.1 Potential Costs to this Sector ............................................................................ 6-3 6.3.2 Potential Benefits to this Sector ........................................................................ 6-4 6.4 Commercial Fisheries ......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Northstar Project Final Environmental
    BEAUFORT SEA OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT/ NORTHSTAR PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Volume I: Cover Sheet Executive Summary Volume II: Chapter 1.0 Introduction Chapter 2.0 Traditional Knowledge Chapter 3.0 Oil and Gas Development/Production Options for the Alaskan Beaufort Sea Chapter 4.0 Northstar Unit Development/Production Alternatives Volume III: Chapter 5.0 Affected Physical Environment and Impacts Chapter 6.0 Affected Biological Environment and Impacts Chapter 7.0 Affected Human Environment and Impacts Volume IV: Chapter 8.0 Effects of Oil on the Physical, Biological, and Human Environments Chapter 9.0 Effects of Noise on the Biological and Human Environments Chapter 10.0 Cumulative Effects Chapter 11.0 Comparison of Project Alternatives and Their Impacts Chapter 12.0 List of Preparers Chapter 13.0 Consultation and Coordination Glossary Index Appendix A: Appendix A Final Project Description Appendices B Through K: Appendix B Biological Assessment Appendix C Updated Mailing List Appendix D Northstar Unit Lease Stipulation Summaries and Applicable Alaska Regulations Appendix E Technical Appendices Appendix F Draft National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Appendix G National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Fact Sheet Appendix H Ocean Discharge Criteria Evaluation Appendix I Section 103 Evaluation Appendix J Draft Underground Injection Control Permit Appendix K Public Comments Received on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Appendix K (Continued) Through P Appendix K Public Comments Received on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Appendix L Response to Public Comments Appendix M Biological Opinions Appendix N Final Underground Injection Control Permit Appendix O Preliminary Final National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Appendix P Reports of the Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS BSOGD/NP EIS LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AAC Alaska Administrative Code ACMP Alaska Coastal Management Program ACS Alaska Clean Seas A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • 11–28–03 Vol. 68 No. 229 Friday Nov. 28, 2003 Pages 66693–67012
    11–28–03 Friday Vol. 68 No. 229 Nov. 28, 2003 Pages 66693–67012 VerDate jul 14 2003 21:10 Nov 26, 2003 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\28NOWS.LOC 28NOWS 1 II Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 229 / Friday, November 28, 2003 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records PUBLIC Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Subscriptions: Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Committee of the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and (Toll-Free) Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public Subscriptions: interest. Paper or fiche 202–741–6005 Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions 202–741–6005 Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the issuing agency requests earlier filing.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Study 2008-2015 Oceanography, College of Geosciences Texas A&M University Self-Study 2008-2015
    Self-Study 2008-2015 Oceanography, College of Geosciences Texas A&M University Self-Study 2008-2015 Executive Summary Welcome from the Department Chapter 1. Introduction to TAMU and TAMU Oceanography Chapter 2. The Mission and Goals of TAMU Oceanography Chapter 3. Evolution of the Department of Oceanography Since 2008 Chapter 4. Departmental Structure and Personnel Chapter 5. Department Resources Chapter 6. Contributions to University Research and Educational Excellence Chapter 7. Academic Programs and Curricula Chapter 8. Student Profile and Contributions Chapter 9. Concluding Observations Appendices Appendix 1: May 2014 Strategic Plan Appendix 2: Faculty Curriculum Vitae Appendix 3: Grants Awarded to the Ad-loc Faculty Appendix 4: Publications listed by year for the Ad-loc Faculty Appendix 5: Oceanography Courses Executive Summary The Department of Oceanography at Texas A&M University, founded in 1949 as the first oceanographic department established at an academic institution, is deeply committed to the unique mission of an AAU member institution with Land-, Sea-, and Space- grant status. With strengthened ties to other marine related units at the College Station and Galveston campuses, and significant investments from the University, we are poised to realize our strategic vision to join the nation’s top rank of institutions for oceanographic research and education at public universities. As part of our 2014 strategic planning effort, we have restructured our departmental educational, research and engagement activities into four interdisciplinary areas of strength: Ocean Observing Science and Technology, Marine Ecosystems Science and Health, Ocean Climate, and Ocean Energy. Observations, in a very broad sense, form the baseline for all of our strategic interdisciplinary themes, and are at the core of our vision to transform STEM education through a focus on big data competency.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior
    United States Department of the Interior U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Anchorage Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office 4700 BLM Road IN REPLY REFER TO: FWS/AFES/AFWCO Anchorage, Alaska 99507-2546 May 26, 2017 Memorandum To: Dr. James Kendall, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Anchorage, Alaska From: for Stewart Cogswell, Anchorage Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska Subject: Biological Opinion on Lease Sale 244 (Consultation 2016-F-0226) This document transmits the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (Service) biological opinion based on our review of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s (BOEM) proposed oil and gas Lease Sale 244 and its effects on the federally threatened Alaska breeding Steller’s eider (Polysticta stelleri), the federally threatened southwest Alaska distinct population segment (DPS) of northern sea otter (Enhydra lutris kenyoni), and designated critical habitat for the southwest Alaska DPS of northern sea otter, in accordance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). We received your July 13, 2016, request for formal consultation on July 26, 2016. We have based this biological opinion on information that accompanied your July 13, 2016, request for consultation, including the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (BOEM 2016a) and biological assessment (BOEM 2016b) for oil and gas activities associated with Lease Sale 244. We can make available a record of this consultation at the Anchorage Fish and Wildlife Office. Consultation History The following is a summary of the consultation history for this project: • July 26, 2016, the Service received a Biological Assessment and request from BOEM to initiate formal consultation for effects caused by activities from oil and gas lease sale 244 in lower Cook Inlet.
    [Show full text]
  • Bp Magazine Issue 2 2009 Ce
    + 18 FAMILY AFFAIR 44 SHIP SHAPE 52 TIME TRAVEL Five generations A century on A timeline of at Whiting the high seas pivotal moments THE INTERNATIONAL MAGAZINE OF THE BP GROUP ISSUE 2 2009 BPMAGAZINE CENTENARY SPECIAL PIONEER SPIRIT To celebrate BP’s centennial year this special edition of BP Magazine reports on key moments in the company’s history, including the discovery that began it all. Welcome. So much of modern business is driven by a desire to move contents / issue 2 2009 forward – to be better today than you + Features were yesterday – that it is easy to forget the value in taking stock of 06 Centennial thoughts Group chief executive Tony Hayward reflects on the company’s history. Interview by Lisa Davison what has gone before. Which is why Photography by Richard Davies, Marc Morrison & Stuart Conway anniversaries can offer a chance to Cover story reflect on standout moments that 12 First frontier The search for oil in Persia was a long one, but when it have made a company great. This came, it began a chain reaction of events that changed the industrial face of the Middle East forever, and led to the incorporation of a company that would year is BP’s 100th anniversary and endure for 100 years. By Vartan Amadouny & Amanda Breen throughout this issue, we look back at 18 Generation game The family and the refinery that have grown up together. some of the people who have worked By Paula Kolmar Photography Marc Morrison tirelessly on geographical, technical 24 Historic launch How BP Shipping has navigated the waterways of the world and political frontiers to meet global for almost a century.
    [Show full text]
  • National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska Final Integrated Activity Plan/Environmental Impact Statement I Contents
    National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska FINAL Integrated Activity Plan/ Environmental Impact Statement Volume 6 Appendices, Glossary, Bibliography Prepared by: U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Anchorage, Alaska In cooperation with: North Slope Borough U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service November 2012 How the IAP/EIS is Organized VOLUME 1 Chapter 1 – Introduction: Summarizes the purpose of and need for this IAP/EIS and decisions to be made. Chapter 2 – Alternatives: Describes and compares proposed management alternatives. Chapter 3 – Affected Environment: Presents existing natural and socioeconomic resources in the NPR-A and trends, including those associated with climate change. VOLUME 2 Chapter 4 – Environmental Consequences (sections 4.1 – 4.4): Provides the assumptions upon which the impact analysis rests and evaluates impacts of Alternatives A and B-1 on resources and uses in the NPR-A relevant to making a decision among the alternatives. VOLUME 3 Chapter 4 – Environmental Consequences continued (sections 4.5 – 4.7): Evaluates impacts of Alternatives B-2 (preferred alternative), C, and D on resources and uses in the NPR-A relevant to making a decision among the alternatives. VOLUME 4 Chapter 4 – Environmental Consequences continued (sections 4.8 – 4.13): Evaluates the cumulative impacts on resources and uses in the NPR-A and other effects relevant to making a decision among the alternatives. VOLUME 5 Chapter 5 – Consultation and Coordination: Describes public and government (including tribal) consultation undertaken for this plan and the development of alternatives and lists the plan’s preparers. Chapter 6 – Comments and Responses: Presents public comments on the Draft IAP/EIS and responses to the comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Beaufort Sea Planning Area Oil and Gas Lease Sales 186, 195, and 202
    Alaska Outer Continental Shelf OCS EIS/EA MMS 2003-001 Beaufort Sea Planning Area Oil and Gas Lease Sales 186, 195, and 202 Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume II (Section VII, Bibliography, Index) B w e o a r r u a fo B rt Sea t le n I e s a e D h it m y S a B Cape Halkett H arriso n Bay ay oe B rudh Colville Delta P Kaktovik Nuiqsut NPR - A Deadhorse C A ANWR U N . A S D . A BEAUFORT SEA PLANNING AREA OIL AND GAS LEASE SALES 186, 195, AND 202 Final Environmental Impact Statement OCS EIS/EA, MMS 2003-001, in 4 volumes: Volume I, Executive Summary, Sections I through VI Volume II, Section VII, Bibliography, Index Volume III, Tables, Figures, and Maps for Volumes I and II Volume IV, Appendices The summary is also available as a separate document: Executive Summary, MMS 2003-002. The complete EIS is available on CD-ROM (MMS 2003-001 CD) and on the Internet (http://www.mms.gov/alaska/cproject/Beafort Sea/). This Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not intended, nor should it be used, as a local planning document by potentially affected communities. The exploration, development and production, and transportation scenarios described in this EIS represent best-estimate assumptions that serve as a basis for identifying characteristic activities and any resulting environmental effects. Several years will elapse before enough is known about potential local details of development to permit estimates suitable for local planning. These assumptions do not represent a Minerals Management Service recommendation, preference, or endorsement of any facility, site, or development plan.
    [Show full text]
  • State Pipeline Coordinator's Office
    STATE PIPELINE COORDINATOR'S OFFICE Fiscal Year 2007 Lease Compliance Monitoring Report ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Executive Summary The Fiscal Year 2007 State Pipeline Coordinator's Office Lease Compliance Monitoring Report describes the status of pipeline right-of-way leases issued by the State under Alaska Statute 38.35, the Alaska Right-of-Way Leasing Act, and one grant of right-of-way for a utility pipeline issued under Alaska Statute 38.05, the Alaska Lands Act. It is produced by the State Pipeline Coordinator's Office (SPCO), an agency within the Alaska Department of Natural Resources (ADNR) and affiliated with the Joint Pipeline Office (JPO). The State fiscal year (FY) begins on July 1 and ends on June 30. FY07 began July 1, 2006 and ended June 30, 2007. This FY07 report includes information about the prior year's construction, operations, and maintenance activities for common carrier pipelines in Southcentral Alaska and on the North Slope. Summaries of ADNR's lease administration and compliance oversight activities related to those pipelines and rights- of-way are also included. This report is intended for use by the public, government agencies, pipeline right-of- way lessees, and others interested in these pipelines. Note that information about the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS) is not contained in this report. Acronyms and Abbreviations All of the acronyms and abbreviations used in this report are defined in Appendix A. Contact Information Alaska Department of Natural Resources State Pipeline Coordinator's Office 411 West 4 th Avenue Anchorage, Alaska 99501 (907) 257-1300 Cover Photo This aerial photo of a beaded stream crossing was taken during the course of compliance oversight field surveillance of the Alpine Pipelines in July 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Accidental Oil Spills and Gas Releases;
    APPENDIX A Accidental Oil Spills and Gas Releases; Information, Models, and Estimates; and Supporting Figures, Tables, and Maps Posted at: https://www.boem.gov/Liberty/ This page intentionally left blank. Appendix A Liberty Development and Production Plan Final EIS Table of Contents Contents A-1 Accidental Large Oil Spills ...................................................................................... 1 A-1.1 Large Spill Size, Source, and Oil-Type Assumptions ............................................................ 1 A-1.1.1 OCS Large Oil Spill Sizes .......................................................................................... 1 A-1.1.2 Onshore Large Oil Pipeline Spill Size ........................................................................ 1 A-1.1.3 Source and Type of Large Oil Spills .......................................................................... 2 A-1.1.4 Historical Loss of Well-Control Incidents on the OCS and North Sea ....................... 2 A-1.2 Behavior and Fate of Crude Oils ............................................................................................ 3 A-1.2.1 Generalized Processes Affecting the Fate and Behavior of Oil................................. 3 A-1.2.2 Assumptions about Oil Spill Weathering .................................................................... 4 A-1.2.3 Modeling Simulations of Oil Weathering .................................................................... 4 A-1.3 Estimates of Where a Large Offshore Oil Spill May Go ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 4310-VH 4310-MR-P DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement 30 CFR Part 250 Bureau of Ocean Ener
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 12/09/2020 and available online at 4310-VH federalregister.gov/d/2020-25818, and on govinfo.gov 4310-MR-P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement 30 CFR Part 250 Bureau of Ocean Energy Management 30 CFR Part 550 [Docket ID: BSEE-2019-0008, EEEE500000, 21XE1700DX, EX1SF0000.EAQ000] RIN 1082-AA01 Oil and Gas and Sulfur Operations on the Outer Continental Shelf—Revisions to the Requirements for Exploratory Drilling on the Arctic Outer Continental Shelf AGENCIES: Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE); Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), Interior. ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: The Department of the Interior (DOI or Department), acting through BOEM and BSEE, has reviewed and is proposing to revise its existing regulations for exploratory drilling and related operations on the Arctic Outer Continental Shelf (OCS), to reduce unnecessary burdens on stakeholders while ensuring that energy exploration on the Arctic OCS is safe and environmentally responsible. In particular, this proposed rule would revise certain requirements promulgated through the rule entitled, Oil and Gas and Sulfur Operations on the Outer Continental Shelf-Requirements for Exploratory Drilling on the Arctic Outer Continental Shelf (“2016 Arctic Exploratory Drilling Rule”). This proposed rule would also add new provisions to BSEE’s regulations pertaining to suspensions of operations (SOO), and BOEM’s Exploration Plan (EP) and Development and Production Plan (DPP) regulations. DATES: Submit comments by [INSERT DATE 60 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. BSEE and BOEM may not fully consider comments received after this date.
    [Show full text]
  • 40 Years of Protecting the Planet the GREENPEACE CHRONICLES 40 Years of Protecting the Planet
    the greenpeace chronicles 40 years of protecting the planet THE GREENPEACE CHRONICLES 40 Years of Protecting the Planet Written and edited by: Steve Erwood Contributors: Laura Kenyon, John Novis, Mike Townsley, Rex Weyler With special thanks to Bill Darnell Creative Direction/Design: Toby Cotton, ARC Communications Acknowledgements: There are many previous chroniclers of Greenpeace’s history whose accounts - like Rex Weyler’s - have informed and influenced this present work. These include Michael Brown and John May, authors of ‘The Greenpeace Story’; Fouad Hamdan and Conny Boettger, authors of ‘Greenpeace: Changing the World’; and Daniel Kramb, who compiled information during Greenpeace’s 40th anniversary year. Thanks are also due to Karen Gallagher, Karen Guy, Elaine Hill, Sara Holden and Alex Yallop Published in November 2011 by Greenpeace International Ottho Heldringstraat 5 1066 AZ Amsterdam The Netherlands Printed on 50% recycled, 50% FSC mixed-source paper using vegetable-based ink. For more information, contact: [email protected] JN400 ISBN 978-90-73361-00-3 contents foreword 2 introduction 3 let’s make it a green peace 6 the women who founded greenpeace 14 origins the warriors of the rainbow 18 s the 70s 20 70 s the 80s 40 ten minutes to midnight, 10 july 1985 58 80 s the 90s 84 david and goliath 100 90 s the 00s 118 00 the 10s 162 s the social network 166 10 40 years of photoactivism 182 40 years of inspiring action 190 get involved 192 office contact details 196 THE grEEnPEACE CHroniClEs 1 ll E rn foreword DA Forty years of campaigns have taught ill many lessons.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior
    Vol. 80 Tuesday, No. 36 February 24, 2015 Part III Department of the Interior Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement 30 CFR Parts 250 and 254 Bureau of Ocean Energy Management 30 CFR Part 550 Oil and Gas and Sulphur Operations on the Outer Continental Shelf— Requirements for Exploratory Drilling on the Arctic Outer Continental Shelf; Proposed Rule VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:32 Feb 23, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\24FEP2.SGM 24FEP2 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2 9916 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 36 / Tuesday, February 24, 2015 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR comments specifically related to the the OCS within the Beaufort Sea and draft Environmental Assessment Chukchi Sea Planning Areas. Bureau of Safety and Environmental conducted under the National BOEM and BSEE have undertaken Enforcement Environmental Policy Act of 1969 extensive environmental and safety (NEPA), please refer to NEPA in the reviews of potential oil and gas 30 CFR Parts 250 and 254 heading of your message. See also, operations on the Arctic OCS. These Public Availability of Comments under reviews, along with concerns expressed Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Procedural Matters. by environmental organizations and • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// Alaska Natives, reinforce the need to 30 CFR Part 550 www.regulations.gov. In the Search box, develop additional measures specifically tailored to the operational [Docket ID: BSEE–2013–0011; 15XE1700DX enter BSEE–2013–0011, then click EX1SF0000.DAQ000 EEEE500000] search. Follow the instructions to and environmental conditions of the submit public comments and view Arctic OCS.
    [Show full text]