Durbrow, Elbridge

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Durbrow, Elbridge Courtesy of the National Archives and Records Service Lyndon Baines Johnson Library The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training oreign Affairs Oral History Pro$ect AMBASSADOR ELBRIDGE DURBROW Interviewed by: Ted Gittinger Initial interview date: June 3, 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS Background - Pre-Saigon experience with Communists Moscow 19,4-19,. Deputy Chief of Mission - 1946-194. State Department - 0ast 0uropean Division - 1122 2taly and Poland - pre-1122 Communist Party and Soviet techni3ues Subversion and terrorism Saigon, 5ietnam 1957-1961 5iew of Diem Diem defeats Binh 8uyen 9.S. A2D programs 1olf Lade$insky;s land reform Relocation program Montagnards vs. 5ietnamese 9.S. military program Road-building 0mbassy-MAAG friction General 1illiams Diem and 1illiams; rapport Maxwell Taylor 9nconventional warfare Civil Guard (5ietnamese) 5iet Cong attack Bien Hoa Air Base Soviet assistance and Ho Chi Minh Trail Hanoi;s tactics against Diem Sihanouk and 5iet Minh intrusions C2A activities 9S advisory buildup Counter-insurgency (9.S.) 1 2nternational Control Commission (2CC) 5iews on Diem Can Lao Party 9.S. advice to Diem Halberstam;s The Best and the Brightest Pentagon Papers Anti-Diem coup Diem;s farewell to Durbrow Diem-9SOM relations Saigon rumor factory Nhus Civil Guard training Briefing successor Nolting Paris, rance - The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) 196l - 1965(?) Diem overthrown Democracy problems 5ietnam 1966 elections Religion and ethnic South 5ietnamese Buddhist AtroublesB Gulf of Tonkin (comments) Graduated response My Lais 1illiam Calley 5iews on 9.S. in 5ietnam Prosecuting the war Civilian vulnerability 5iet Cong and terrorism 1ars of ANational liberationB INTERVIEW Q: Mr. Ambassad r, were y u given a briefing, a f rmal briefing r inf rmal, bef re y u went t Saig n in 1957% D9RBRO1C Oh, yes. 2 came back to 1ashington for about three or four weeks, 2Dve forgotten how long. 2Dd been in 5ietnam before, because 2 was stationed in Malaysia. 2Dd been up there Eto visitF my predecessor, reddie Reinhardt, Ewho isF a very close friend of mine, an old Moscow callow colleague. 2Dd been up to Saigon on a long visit one time, so 2 knew the situation up there, the physical situation. Then 2 came back and 2 was briefed in the department and in the Pentagon and in the C2A and everything else, a full briefing. 2 went out there in March of 1957. 2 Q: What were y ur e(pectati ns that y u derived fr m the briefing% What s rt f situati n did y u e(pect% What kind f pr blems did y u e(pect t enc unter% D9RBRO1C 1ell, one way or the other, 2 was not surprised by anything for the simple reason that 2 spent most of my career dealing with communists. 2 went on my first mission to Moscow in 19,4, was there for four years. 2 had gone into Moscow again during the war on a short TDG, about four months. Then 2 came back again to Moscow in 1946-4. as the deputy chief of mission there dealing with the Hremlin boys. 2 dealt with them during the war when 2 was with the 0ast 0uropean Division. 2 had been in 2taly, a big Communist Party thereI 2Dd been in Poland way back when before that, so 2 thought 2 knew something about the way they operate. Nobody does really, but you get a better idea if youDve been there. So 2 wasnDt surprised. 2 knew what we were fighting, which is something 2 donDt think they understand today, really. The American public and the press doesnDt, 2 donDt think. So therefore the public should learn much about it, what a war of national liberation is all about. ThatDs a techni3ue that the Soviets developed a long time ago. TheyDve perfected it, and 5ietnam is one of the best examples of it. Our press, in 5ietnam particularly but elsewhere even before that, they think this is a local insurgency, a local civil war, grow like Topsy in whatever country it is, and theyDre fighting for their freedoms against the oppressive government or the imperialist Americans, whatever you want to call it. So, in that sense, 2 suppose thatDs one of the reasons why 2 was sent there, because 2 had had experience in that sort of thing before. So 2 wasnDt surprised in any way at all. The problem was that they were trying to take over the country by subversive methods and terrorists. ThatDs one thing 2 think that is not understood at all, is that a war of national liberation is a well worked out techni3ue, and only one of the tools of that techni3ue is terrorism. 1eDre talking so much about terrorism today, and terrorism, well, thatDs part of it, no 3uestion about it. But 2 donDt think anybody else has any--0l Salvador is a war of national liberation. 2tDs not a local civil war down there. Nicaragua is the same thing. Angola was the same thing. 5ietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Cuba, South Gemen, theyDre all caused by national liberation. 2 tried to bring that out in that paper 2 gave you the other day. Q: Let me ask y u ab ut President .Ng Dinh1 Diem. N w, when y u went t 2ietnam in 1957, what was the generally held view f Diem and what he had d ne in 2ietnam up till that time% D9RBRO1C 1ell, his image was going up 3uite well by that time. reddie Reinhardt, who had also done the Moscow tour and knew the situation, was there when he took over and he helped him to get started. 1e all did or our government did. So by 1956, 1957, heDd beaten down the Binh 8uyen in the town there in the 1955 war, fighting right in the streets. On the other attempts by the two to three thousand well-trained communist guerrillas that theyDd left behind after the 1954 accords... They werenDt supposed to, of course. And Hanoi hoped and expected Ehe would be defeatedF. Diem wasnDt too well known, he didnDt have too much of a following in the country. HeDd been exiled and out and that sort of thing. They hoped 3 that by terrorism, subversion, propaganda, and intimidation that they could topple that government without having to go to an all-out military effort. But by 1956 Diem had calmed those things down pretty well, beaten the Binh 8uyen. The Hoa Hao and the Cao Dai sects were collaborating with him. 2n the time beginning in 1956 he started to rebuild the country, the countryside and things of that kind. 1ith our A2D program and our assistance, we worked on a plan for land reform, which turned out to be 3uite a good one, as a matter of fact, eventually. As 2 remember the figures, there were about six hundred thousand acres taken from the larger landlords and divided up into seven acre or three hectare plots for about a hundred and twenty-five thousand families, mostly in the Delta, because thatDs where it was easier to do and where the best productivity on this land was. Q: ,et me ask y u t f ll w n a line c nnected with that. N w, there was a l t f criticism then and later n the sub3ect f land ref rm in S uth 2ietnam, at least there was in the press. And there was s me, I understand, am ng s me members f the missi n, t . Did y u kn w W lf Lade3insky% D9RBRO1C Lade$insky, yes. 2 knew him very well. HeDs the guy that put it in. HeDs the guy that worked it up. Q: Didn4t s mething c me up between him and Diem later% D9RBRO1C Ges, but it wasnDt over the land reform. Q: Oh, it wasn4t ver land ref rm% D9RBRO1C No, no. 1olf Lade$insky had done a wonderful job in Japan, you know, before that. He got them to become eventually self-sufficient in their rice production. HeDd worked in the Philippines and he came down to 5ietnam. And 1olf did a very fine job basically in that field and other agricultural developments, helping with the rubber and new plants and that sort of thing. But there was no Edisagreement thereF. They fought over other things later, because he became a very intimate adviser to Diem. On some of the things 2 worked with 1olf, too. 2Dd only maybe come into it later, 2Dll bring it up now, though. Gou probably have seen the Pentagon Papers or somewhere else or EDavidF HalberstamDs book EThe Best and the BrightestF about the instructions 2 asked for in September 1960 to help Diem to get a better hold on things and get things going in a better direction, more democratic and that sort of thing. 1ell, 1olf was all for me on that sort of business because the land reform was going great guns by then. So 1olf was a great help, but he was advising on all sorts of other things besides land by that time. So when the break came--2Dve forgotten--he and 2 talked it over, but it wasnDt a Kthrow him out of the country in twenty-four hoursK sort of thing. Just a disagreement-- Q: Falling ut. 4 D9RBRO1C --falling out, yes. And he went on to 2ndia from there. But the land reform, 2 tell you, was a darn good success, six hundred thousand acres, a hundred and twenty-five thousand families. 2 visited many times, saw the things and we did the cadastral work and a lot of the other stuff to help them out.
Recommended publications
  • Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project THEODORE J. C. HEAVNER Interviewed By: Char
    Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project THEODORE J. C. HEAVNER Interviewed by: Charles Stuart Kennedy Initial interview date: May 28, 1997 Copyright 2 ADST TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Born and raised in Canton, O io Nort western University and (Case) Western Reserve University of Iowa Harvard University U.S. Army - ,orean War Entered Foreign Service - .900 UNESCO .900-.901 Duties State Department - Foreign Service Institute - .902 3ietnamese 4anguage Training Cornell University - Sout east Asia Program .902-.908 Nort versus Sout 3ietnam Saigon, 3ietnam - Political Officer .908-.909 Diem and private armies Relations wit government officials Cinnamon production Ambassador Durbrow 3iet Cong t reat Consular district Duties Ngo Din Can Reporting Cat olic C urc role Diplomatic colleagues Environment 7ontagnards Pleiku 3ietnamese military 1 Tran 3an Don Saigon, 3ietnam - Political Officer .910-.91. 4yndon B. 9o nson visit Ambassador Ale:is 9o nson and Diem ,ennedy;s 3ietnam policy State Department - 3ietnam Working Group .91.-.913 Averell Harriman Counterinsurgency U.S. policy re Nort 3ietnam Strategy options Ot er agency programs Diem regime 3ietnamese loyalties T ieu ,y regime President ,ennedy interest Defoliants Roger Hilsman C ina role State Department - Foreign Service Institute (FSI) .913-.914 Indonesian 4anguage Training 7edan, Indonesia - Consul and Principal Officer .914-.911 Ambassador Howard 9ones Ambassador 7ars all Green Sukarno and communists Anti-U.S. demonstrations Sumatra groups
    [Show full text]
  • Courtesy of the National Archives and Records Service Lyndon Baines Johnson Library
    Courtesy of the National Archives and Records Service Lyndon Baines Johnson Library The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project AMBASSADOR FREDERICK ERNEST NOLTING, JR. Interviewed by: Ted Gittinger, LBJ Library Initial interview date: November 11, 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS Situation on arrival in Vietnam Lack of stability in Vietnam Johnson calls Diem the “Churchill of Asia” Diem elected by 90% of votes - fraud? General McGarr transferred Embassy-Diem relations Taylor-Rostow mission aftermath U.S. combat engineer troops in Delta President Kennedy on punishing North Vietnam Diem opposes introduction of U.S. forces Retribution against North Vietnam General Ed Lansdale’s views Gilpatric task force Vietnamese (South) and communists Mostly anti-communist Viet Cong (fear of) Ap Bac Battle - 1963 Colonel Vann’s outburst Diem on pacification Buddhist crisis - May 1963 Tri Quang suicide Harriman’s view of Nolting Diem and Buddhists Bui Van Luong Religious agreement Buddhist and Viet Cong aims converge Pagoda raids 1 Buddhists’ organization Buddhist movement Mr. Nhu’s invention? Vietnamese - views of Diem’s fall Majority probably not happy Madam Nhu not popular Brothers-in-law criticize Diem CIA in 1960 coup? Embassy relations with U.S. military Appointment and description of MAAG General Paul Harkins Who is in charge? Kennedy says “Ambassador” Joint Chiefs’ view of rank Rufus Phillips’ NSC testimony Gloomy assessment Confusion of Vietnamese military Views on President President Johnson’s views on Vietnam Kennedy and Johnson’s views differ Johnson’s reasons for appointment of Ambassador Lodge Johnson inherits Kennedy’s Vietnam political mess Questions INTERVIEW Q: Ambassador Nolting, would you begin by telling me if there was anything that could be considered a legacy that Ambassador [Elbridge] Durbrow had left for you to inherit? NOLTING: Yes.
    [Show full text]
  • JOHN FOSTER DULLES PAPERS PERSONNEL SERIES The
    JOHN FOSTER DULLES PAPERS PERSONNEL SERIES The Personnel Series, consisting of approximately 17,900 pages, is comprised of three subseries, an alphabetically arranged Chiefs of Mission Subseries, an alphabetically arranged Special Liaison Staff Subseries and a Chronological Subseries. The entire series focuses on appointments and evaluations of ambassadors and other foreign service personnel and consideration of political appointees for various posts. The series is an important source of information on the staffing of foreign service posts with African- Americans, Jews, women, and individuals representing various political constituencies. Frank assessments of the performances of many chiefs of mission are found here, especially in the Chiefs of Mission Subseries and much of the series reflects input sought and obtained by Secretary Dulles from his staff concerning the political suitability of ambassadors currently serving as well as numerous potential appointees. While the emphasis is on personalities and politics, information on U.S. relations with various foreign countries can be found in this series. The Chiefs of Mission Subseries totals approximately 1,800 pages and contains candid assessments of U.S. ambassadors to certain countries, lists of chiefs of missions and indications of which ones were to be changed, biographical data, materials re controversial individuals such as John Paton Davies, Julius Holmes, Wolf Ladejinsky, Jesse Locker, William D. Pawley, and others, memoranda regarding Leonard Hall and political patronage, procedures for selecting career and political candidates for positions, discussions of “most urgent problems” for ambassadorships in certain countries, consideration of African-American appointees, comments on certain individuals’ connections to Truman Administration, and lists of personnel in Secretary of State’s office.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foreign Service Journal, January 1950
    g,L AMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE VOL. 27, NO. 1 JOURNAL JANUARY, 1950 tMdMf'f! T % t'^W TC:l ■ ) - Y*?; 4 t1 Ui yi & ———■ IHHI«MI THE HOUSE FOREIGN AFFAIRS COMMITTEE First Meeting of the New Session It gives us special satisfaction to supply I. W. Harper Whiskey to men and women in America’s foreign service. We are proud to serve you, and we value highly the example you set for your guests. For these reasons alone, you can depend on our safeguarding I. W. Harper’s unexcelled taste and quality. Cost is never consulted in making this superb whiskey. It’s made for you to pour with pride and drink with pleasure. Distributed overseas by SCHENLEY INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION THERE ARE NO FINER WHISKIES THAN AMERICAN WHISKIES I.W.HARPER AMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION HONORARY PRESIDENT FOREIGN SERVICE DEAN ACHESON SECRETARY OF STATE HONORARY VICE-PRESIDENTS THE UNDER SECRETARY OF STATE THE ASSISTANT SECRETARIES OF JOURNAL STATE THE COUNSELOR GEORGE F. KENNAN PRESIDENT W. WALTON BUTTERWORTH VICE PRESIDENT ELBERT G. MATHEWS SECRETARY-TREASURER JOHN M. McSWEENEY ASSISTANT SECRETARY-TREASURER BARBARA P. CHALMERS EXECUTIVE SECRETARY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE HERVE J. L’HEUREUX CHAIRMAN ELBRIDGE DURBROW VICE CHAIRMAN ELBERT G. MATHEWS JOHN M. McSWEENEY WILLIAM P. HUGHES ALTERNATE PUBLISHED MONTHLY BY RAYMOND A. HARE HAROLD N. WADDELL THE AMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE ASSOCIATION JOURNAL EDITORIAL BOARD EDMUND A. GULLION CHAIRMAN FRANK S. HOPKINS JOHN M. ALLISON VOL. 27, NO. 1 JANUARY 1950 PAUL J. REVELEY MARTIN F. HERZ JOAN DAVID MANAGING EDITOR ALEXANDER PAUL COVER PICTURE: Foreign Committee meets to map program.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with John W. Kimball
    Library of Congress Interview with John W. Kimball The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project JOHN W. KIMBALL Interviewed by: Charles Stuart Kennedy Initial interview date: May 24, 1999 Copyright 2004 ADST Q: Today is the 24th of May, 1999. This is an interview with John W. Kimball and it is being done on behalf of the Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training. I am Charles Stuart Kennedy. John, let me start at the beginning. Can you tell me when and where you were born, and something about your family? KIMBALL: I was born October 13, 1934, in San Francisco, California. My father moved from South Dakota in 1916 with his parents to farmland in Chino. My mother grew up in Wisconsin. She was a high school music teacher and worked in California in the late 1920s after teaching also in Alabama, Arizona, and Wyoming. They were married in Long Beach. When I was born, my father was working in an office in San Francisco. He managed farmland in the San Joaquin valley owned by gold dredging firms operating in the area. He passed away when I was eleven. Q: Was your mother teaching? KIMBALL: Not when I was born, no. Q: Were you brought up in San Francisco? Interview with John W. Kimball http://www.loc.gov/item/mfdipbib001383 Library of Congress KIMBALL: No. My parents were living in Burlingame when I was born. I went to public schools in Berkeley and Palo Alto. I graduated from Palo Alto High School and, later, Stanford University.
    [Show full text]
  • Images of Inherited War Ree American Presidents in Vietnam
    THE 13 DREW PER PA S Images of Inherited War ree American Presidents in Vietnam William R. Hersch Lieutenant Colonel, USAF Air University David S. Fadok, Lieutenant General, Commander and President School of Advanced Air and Space Studies Jeffrey J. Smith, Colonel, PhD, Commandant and Dean AIR UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ADVANCED AIR AND SPACE STUDIES Images of Inherited War Three American Presidents in Vietnam William R. Hersch Lieutenant Colonel, USAF Drew Paper No. 13 Air University Press Air Force Research Institute Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama Project Editor Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Jeanne K. Shamburger Hersch, William R., 1972– Cover Art, Book Design, and Illustrations Images of inherited war : three American presidents in Vietnam Daniel Armstrong / William R. Hersch, Lt. Colonel, USAF. Composition and Prepress Production pages cm. — (Drew paper, ISSN 1941-3785 ; no. 13) Nedra Looney Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-1-58566-249-4 Print Preparation and Distribution 1. Vietnam War, 1961–1975—Public opinion. 2. Vietnam War, Diane Clark 1961–1975—United States. 3. Kennedy, John F. (John Fitzgerald), 1917–1963—Public opinion. 4. Johnson, Lyndon B. (Lyndon Baines), 1908–1973—Public opinion. 5. Nixon, Richard M. (Richard Milhous), 1913–1994—Public opinion. 6. Political AIR FORCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE culture—United States—History—20th century. 7. Public opinion—United States—History—20th century. I. Title. AIR UNIVERSITY PRESS DS559.62.U6H46 2014 959.704’31–dc23 2014034552 Director and Publisher Allen G. Peck Editor in Chief Oreste M. Johnson Published by Air University Press in February 2014 Managing Editor Demorah Hayes Design and Production Manager Cheryl King Air University Press 155 N.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam: Mr. Johnson's War -Or Mr. Eisenhower's?
    Vietnam: Mr. Johnson's War -Or Mr. Eisenhower's? Edward Cuddy Conventional wisdom pins responsibility for the Vietnam War primarily on Lyndon B. Johnson. This essay presents a revisionist argument, attempting to shift primary responsibility for the war on President Dwight D. Eisenhower. The case rests heavily on John F. Kennedy's challenge to historians: "How the hell" can they evaluate presidential performances unless they know the "real pressures" and the "real alternatives" confronting the occupiers of the Oval Office. In assessing those pressures, this essay concludes that Eisenhower had the unique luxury of a clean break from President Truman's commitments, thanks to the Vietnamese victory at Dien Bien Phu, and a clear-cut alternative provided by the Geneva Accords. Unfortunately, Eisenhower chose to ignore the Accords, committed America to South Vietnam, and played a major role, during and after his presidency, in creating the heavy pressures that shaped Johnson's Vietnam decisions. The Kennedy Challenge "How the hell can you tell?" snapped President John F. Kennedy, when asked to rank American presidents for the Schlesinger poll in 1962. He was challenging Schlesinger's son, Arthur, Jr., historian and presidential aide. Only the president himself can know his "real pres- sures" and "real alternatives," he insisted, though a detailed study could help reveal the differences made by individuals. "Would Lin- coln have been judged so great a President, if he had lived long enough to face the almost insoluble problem of Reconstruction?" he mused.' Today, Kennedy's words reek with prophetic irony. Like Lin- coln, he, too, was assassinated and succeeded by another President Johnson, leaving historians to debate a similar question: Would Kennedy's stature have fared so well if he had confronted the in- tractable dilemmas of Vietnam? Of the five presidents from Harry S Truman to Richard M.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Print Version (PDF)
    The 77 TH SFG Mission to South Vietnam:196 0 By Eugene G. Piasecki 46 Veritas 1954, in accordance with the Geneva Accords, President Dwight In a separate military agreement between France D. Eisenhower and and the Ho Chi Minh-led Viet Minh ended the fighting Secretary of State John between the Communist Democratic Republic of Vietnam Foster Dulles greeting and the French Expeditionary Corps. Vietnam was Vietnamese President partitioned at the 17th parallel. The Viet Minh withdrew Ngo Dinh Diem on north of the parallel and French forces to the south. New his visit to the USA military equipment fielding and French troop strength in 1957. Arriving in was capped. Only replacements could enter South Eisenhower’s personal Vietnam and the general elections would be supervised airplane, Diem was hailed as the “Savior by a United Nations International Control Commission 1 of Southeast Asia” (ICC). India, Poland, and Canada formed the ICC. From by the president. 1955 to 1960, internal political and military instability in the south did not go unnoticed by North Vietnam. The Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN) in the 1950s mirrored the post Korean-War American Army organization and was trained to conduct conventional LTG Samuel T. “Hanging Sam” operations against Communist invasion by North Williams. A Veteran of WWI, Vietnamese Regular Army forces. Little consideration WWII, and Korea he was the was given to counterguerrilla warfare. Chief, Military Assistance Advisory Group (MAAG), Capitalizing on the situation, North Vietnamese- Vietnam from 18 November sponsored Viet Cong (VC) guerrilla forces in South 1955 to 1 September 1960.
    [Show full text]
  • Excerpts from the Vietnam Country Reader the Complete Reader
    Excerpts from the Vietnam Country Reader The complete Reader, more than 2,600 pages in length, is available for purchase http://adst.org/store/#!/~/category/id=4169163 VIETNAM COUNTRY READER TABLE OF CONTENTS Merritt N. Cootes 1936 Temporary Consul, Saigon Kingsley W. Hamilton 1940-1942 Consular Officer, Saigon Albert Stoffel 1946-1948 Vice Consul, Saigon Oscar Vance Armstrong 1950 Chinese Language Officer, Saigon John F. Melby 1950 City Unspecified, Vietnam Charlotte Loris 1950-1952 Clerk, Saigon Thomas J. Corcoran 1950-1953 Political Officer, Saigon 1954-1955 Consul, Hanoi Paul M. Kattenburg 1950-1955 Intelligence Analyst, Indochinese Affairs, Bureau of Intelligence and Research, Washington, DC 1963-1964 Country Officer, East Asia Bureau, Washington, DC 1964-1965 Political Officer, Policy Planning, Washington, DC L. Michael Rives 1951-1952 Political Officer, Hanoi Scott Cohen 1951-1953 Foreign Broadcasting Information Service (FBIS) Officer, Saigon Richard C. Matheron 1951-1953 Special Technical and Economic Mission, Saigon 1953-1956 Special Technical and Economic Mission, Hue Bertha Potts 1952-1954 Cultural Affairs Officer, USIS, Saigon William J. Cunningham 1952-1954 General Services Assistant, Saigon Howard R. Simpson 1952-1955 Press Officer, Saigon 1964-1965 Information Officer, Saigon Samuel Clifford Adams, Jr. 1952-1955 Education Advisor, Saigon Randolph A. Kidder 1953-1955 Political Officer, Saigon 1955 Chargé d’Affaires, Saigon George Lambrakis 1954-1955 Trainee, USIS, Saigon Robert F. Franklin 1954-1956 Radio Officer, USIS, Hanoi and Saigon 1962 Press Officer, Saigon John A. Lacey 1954-1956 Intelligence Analyst, Vietnamese Affairs, Bureau of Intelligence and Research, Washington, DC 1965-1966 Country Officer, Burma/Cambodia Desk, Washington, DC Rufus C.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Anglo-American Alliance And
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Brunel University Research Archive This is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of an article published in Diplomacy & Statecraft, 23(3), 471-492, 2012 [copyright Taylor & Francis], available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09592296.2012.706536 ‘A long, slow and painful road’: the Anglo-American Alliance and the Issue of Cooperation with the USSR from Teheran to D-Day Martin Folly Abstract The Second World War Anglo-American alliance was less cohesive on the political side than the military. There were widening divergences between Britain and the United States with regard to the best way to handle cooperation with the USSR during 1944. There were some shared assumptions about the motivations of Soviet policy, but policy-makers in Britain and the US not only formulated different approaches, but consistently viewed their own ones to be more successful than those of their ally. There was an opportunity to coordinate polices in US Under-Secretary of State Edward Stettinius’s mission to London in April 1944, but the fact that the issue was barely discussed is symptomatic of the situation. The British Foreign Office gained the backing of Winston Churchill in an attempt to forge ahead with pragmatic arrangements with the USSR. A satisfaction with their own efforts on both sides meant that the British and American bureaucracies made no serious and sustained attempt to coordinate their policies to the USSR through 1944, in contrast to the closeness of cooperation in other areas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foreign Service Journal, April 1949
    qL AMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE JOURNAL APRIL 1949 IN NEW YORK . The Iridium Room of the St. Regis Hotel is a select gathering place for people of refinement and distinction. Due to its natural flavor, Schenley Whiskey is popular there. lor connoisseurs all over the world .. THROUGHOUT THE WORLD ... Wherever the Smart World gathers, Schenley Reserve is always in demand. Discriminating people appreciate its distinctively American flavor and smoothness. • Try Schenley Whiskey, the American whiskey, with the light, smooth taste. It is mellow and delicious with soda, ginger ale, or water . ideal for making cocktails and other mixed drinks. Schenley Inter¬ national Corporation, Empire State Building, New York, U. S. A. In the Smart World, it's . The World’s Targes! Selling SCHENLEY Whiskey AMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION HONORARY PRESIDENT SECRETARY OF STATE FOREIGN SERVICE DEAN ACHESON HONORARY VICE-PRESIDENTS JAMES E. WEBB UNDER SECRETARY OF STATE CHARLES E. BOHLEN COUNSELOR JOURNAL WILLARD L. THORP ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF STATE JOHN E. PEURIFOY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF STATE CHARLES E. SALTZMAN ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF STATE DEAN RUSK ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF STATE ERNEST A. GROSS ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF STATE NORMAN ARMOUR PRESIDENT GEORGE V. ALLEN VICE-PRESIDENT FRANK P. LOCKHART DIRECTOR MARSHALL GREEN SECRETARY-TREASURER ELBERT G. MATHEWS ASSISTANT SECRETARY-TREASURER EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE PUBLISHED MONTHLY BY GEORGE H. BUTLER CHAIRMAN SHELDON T. MILLS VICE CHAIRMAN ELBERT G. MATHEWS THE AMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE ASSOCIATION HERBERT P. FALES MARSHALL GREEN BROMLEY K. SMITH ALTERNATE JOURNAL EDITORIAL BOARD VOL. 26, NO. 4 APRIL, 1949 EDMUND A. GULLION CHAIRMAN ROBERT McCLINTOCK COVER PICTURE: Cherry Blossoms at the Tidal Basin, Washington, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy, Diplomacy, and the Cold War: the United States, Turkey, and NATO, 1945-1952 Author(S): Melvyn P
    Strategy, Diplomacy, and the Cold War: The United States, Turkey, and NATO, 1945-1952 Author(s): Melvyn P. Leffler Source: The Journal of American History, Vol. 71, No. 4 (Mar., 1985), pp. 807-825 Published by: Organization of American Historians Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1888505 . Accessed: 15/09/2011 19:06 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Organization of American Historians is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of American History. http://www.jstor.org Strategy,Diplomacy, and the Cold War: The UnitedStates, Turkey, and NATO, 1945-1952 MelvynP. Leffler On March12, 1947,President Harry S. Trumanappeared before a jointsession of Congressand made one of the most momentousaddresses of the postwar era. Requesting$400 millionin aid forGreece and Turkey, he emphasizedthat a "fatefulhour" had arrivedand thatnations had to "choose betweenalter- nativeways of life." The UnitedStates, Truman insisted, had to support"free peoples who are resistingattempted subjugation by armedminorities or by outside pressures."Greece, of course, was then beleagueredby civil war. Turkey,while enjoyingremarkable internal stability, supposedly was subject to pressurefrom the SovietUnion, a constantwar of nerves, and theprospect of outrightSoviet aggression.Undersecretary of State Dean G.
    [Show full text]