DOCSLIB.ORG

Border Restrictions Updated 6 April 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Please note, although we endeavour to provide you with the most up to date information derived from various third parties an d sources, we cannot be held accountable for any inaccuracies or changes to this information. Inclusion of company information in this matrix does no t imply any business relationship between the supplier and WFP / Logistics Cluster, and is used solely as a determinant of services, and capacities. Logistics Cluster /WFP maintain complete impartiality and are not in a position to endorse, comment on any company's suitability as a reputable serv ice provider. If you have any updates to share, please email them to: [email protected] Border Restrictions Updated 6 April 2021 State / Territory Restrictions (Other Info) Restriction Period Source of Info URL / Remarks State of Emergency is extended until 18 April 2021. Color-coded system to guide response. Current level is Code Blue. All entry permits suspended until further notice. All travellers must provide negative COVID-19 test results within 72 hours before arrival and are subject to full quarantine of 14 days. Moreover, the American Samoa traveller is required to disclose if he/she had a positive result prior to testing negative. American Samoa Until 18 April 2021 Government, 19 March https://www.americansamoa.gov/ Cargo flights into the Territory to deliver or retrieve cargo or mail will be allowed, provided that each 2021 occupant of the plane must furnish proof to the Director of Health of a negative COVID-19 test results within 72 hours before arrival, and further provided tht no one will disembark withouth the prior written approval of the Governor. The New Zealand safe travel zone allows for travellers who have been in New Zealand for 14 days to travel Australian Department by air to Australia quarantine-free, without applying for a travel exemption. Routine pre-departure and on Australia UFN of Home Affairs, 29 https://covid19.homeaffairs.gov.au/ arrival screening will apply. All travellers should check the arrangements in both their place of arrival and March 2021 place of final destination as quarantine requirements might apply. Unless arriving to Australia on a quarantine-free flight from New Zealand, travellers to Australia (including Australian Department Australia Australian citizens) must quarantine for 14 days at a designated facility in their port of arrival. See UFN of Home Affairs, 24 https://covid19.homeaffairs.gov.au/ Coronavirus (COVID-19) advice for travellers. You may be required to pay for the costs of your quarantine. March 2021 A negative COVID-19 Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) test resulttaken 72 hours or less before your Australian Department Australia scheduled departure is required for travelling to or transiting through Australia unless you are travelling on UFN of Home Affairs, 19 https://covid19.homeaffairs.gov.au/ a quarantine-free flight from New Zealand. March 2021 Australian Department Before you travel to Australia, you should complete the Australia Travel Declaration at least 72 hours before Australia UFN of Home Affairs, 11 https://covid19.homeaffairs.gov.au/ your departure for Australia. March 2021 Commonwealth of The CNMI is establishing a process to consider modified quarantine for returning residents who plan to CNMI Government, 16 Northern Mariana UFN https://governor.gov.mp/covid-19/travel/ quarantine on Saipan. March 2021 Islands All passengers who are travelling into Saipan (regardless of point of origin) must quarantine for a minimum of 5 - 7 days at their designated government quarantine facility. Currently, CIVID-19 vaccination prior to Commonwealth of entering CNMI does not influence quaratine assessment and process. Upon arrival at their designated CNMI Government, 11 Northern Mariana UFN https://governor.gov.mp/covid-19/travel/ government quarantine facility, all travelers are required to undergo 1st day testing. In addition, all travelers February 2021 Islands are required to test a second time on the 5th day after their arrival date. If 5th day testing returns negative, individuals may be released from the designated government quarantine facility. Effective from 11.59pm Saturday 6th March 2021 (CKT), the following persons are exempted for entry into the Cook Islands, provided they additionally meet the entry criteria specified below; Cook Islanders (as verified via Cook Islands Status stamp), Permanent Residents of the Cook Islands, Cook Islands work permit holders and Cook Islands resident permit holders. The above must have spent the last Cook Islands 14 days in New Zealand and/or the Cook Islands, prior to entry into the Cook Islands https://cookislands.travel/news/novel-coronavirus- Cook Islands UFN Government, 5 March Clinical/medical criteria to be administered by Te Marae Ora Ministry of Health prior to departure from information-travellers-arriving-cook-islands 2020 Auckland, New Zealand; provided a negative COVID-19 test within 72 hours prior to departure from Auckland, New Zealand. All requests for entry into the Cook Islands must be sought from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Immigration (Te Kauono Tutara e te Mana Tiaki) on email: [email protected]. FSM Information Federated States of Declaration of Public Health Emergency Extended to 31 May 2021 Until 31 May 2021 Services Press Release, https://gov.fm/ Micronesia 5 April 2021 Fiji’s border remains close for now and only Fijian citizens are allowed to return on repatriation flights. Fiji is Fiji UFN [email protected] Dated 5 June not allowing any transits through Fiji from all countries abroad including Pacific Island countries. As of Wednesday, February 3rd, travel is authorized only for travelers who can justify one of the compelling reasons (health, professional, family, return home) as described on the website of the High Commission. The duration of this measure will be specified in the coming days. All travelers aged 11 and over who travel to French Polynesia by air are subject to the following mandatory conditions: Prior to boarding: Proof of a negative RT-PCR test (any RT-PCR test listed on this FDA site is allowed) carried out within three French Polynesia French Polynesia days prior to their international air departure. If the result is not obtained in due time, a certificate of UFN Government, 15 https://tahititourisme.ca/en-ca/covid-19/ completion of the RT-PCR test must be presented to the airline company, together with a negative result to February 2021 an antigen test performed on the day of boarding. Any antigen test listed on this FDA site is acceptable for the same-day test in the event the RT-PCR test result was not received. Self-tests are not accepted. Present the receipt of the health registration from the Etis.pf platform (Electronic Travel Information System). Present the certificate of derogatory travel and the declaration on honour completed and signed. Guam Department of Public Health and Social Guam Executive Order 2021-04 declares Pandemic Condition of Readiness 3 in Guam. UFN http://dphss.guam.gov/covid-19/ Services, 19 February 2021 Governor Ige issued the eighteenth supplemental proclamation, which includes mention of an anticipated new exception for vaccinated travelers that will become effective only upon approval by the director of the Hawaii Emergency Management Agency. This exception is not available as of today. Office of the Governor https://www.hawaiitourismauthority.org/covid-19- Hawaii All transpacific travelers are required to have a negative test result from a trusted travel partner before their Until 13 April 2021 of Hawai'i, 12 February updates/state-and-county-orders/ departure for Hawaii, in order to bypass the mandatory 10-day quarantine. Test results will not be accepted 2021 once a traveler arrives in Hawaii. Travelers who do not have a negative test result prior to departing for Hawaii must self-quarantine for 10 days. Countries/Regions subject to denial of permission to enter Japan: Asia -- Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Maldives, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines North America -- Canada, United States of America Latin America and the Caribbean -- Argentine, Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Grenada, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Saint Christopher and Nevis, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay, Venezuela Europe -- Albania, Andorra, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Japan Ministry of Japan Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kyrgyz, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, UFN Foreign Affairs, 19 https://www.mofa.go.jp/p_pd/ipr/page7e_900126.html Malta, Moldova, Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, February 2021 Russia, San Marino, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Tajikistan, Ukraine, United Kingdom, Uzbekistan, Vatican Middle East -- Afghanistan, Bahrain, Israel, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Palestine, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates Africa -- Algeria, Botswana, Cabo Verde, Cameroon, Central Africa, Comoros, Cote d’lvoire, Democratic Republic of Congo, Djibouti, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Eswatini, Ethiopia, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Kenya, Lesotho,
Recommended publications
  • CHRISTIAN GERLACH Sustainable Violence: Mass Resettlement, Strategic Villages, and Militias in Anti-Guerrilla Warfare

    CHRISTIAN GERLACH Sustainable Violence: Mass Resettlement, Strategic Villages, and Militias in Anti-Guerrilla Warfare

    CHRISTIAN GERLACH Sustainable Violence: Mass Resettlement, Strategic Villages, and Militias in Anti-Guerrilla Warfare in RICHARD BESSEL AND CLAUDIA B. HAAKE (eds.), Removing Peoples. Forced Removal in the Modern World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009) pp. 360–393 ISBN: 978 0 199 56195 7 The following PDF is published under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND licence. Anyone may freely read, download, distribute, and make the work available to the public in printed or electronic form provided that appropriate credit is given. However, no commercial use is allowed and the work may not be altered or transformed, or serve as the basis for a derivative work. The publication rights for this volume have formally reverted from Oxford University Press to the German Historical Institute London. All reasonable effort has been made to contact any further copyright holders in this volume. Any objections to this material being published online under open access should be addressed to the German Historical Institute London. DOI: 15 Sustainable Violence: Mass Resettlement, Strategic Villages, and Militias in Anti-Guerrilla Warfare CHRISTIAN GERLACH Introduction The story told in this essay begins around 1950, about at the end of what some call the 'racial century'. 1 In scholarly discussion anti-partisan warfare has been relatively neglected, although it accounted for a large proportion of the victims of mass violence in the twentieth century.2 Many of these victims resulted from resettlement, removal, and expulsion. Yet the events covered here have hardly played a part in debates about enforced popu- lation movements during the past decade or two, given that mass transfers of populations have increasingly been declared 'ethnic' in the course of what amounts to an ethnization of history due to post-1989 bourgeois triumphalism.
  • Caribbean Regional

    Caribbean Regional

    WORKING DOCUMENT SERIES CARIBBEAN REGIONAL GENERAL WORKING DOCUMENT 83 A SURVEY OF THE LITERATURE ON INCOME DISTRIDUTION AND THE FULFILLMENT OF BASIC HUMAN NEEDS IN THE CARIBBEAN REGION* *Antigua, Barbados, Belize, British Virgin Is., Cayman Is., Dominica, Grenada, Montserrat, St. Kitts-Nevis- (Anguilla), St. Lucia, St. Vincent, Turks & Caicos Is. Clarence Zuvekas , Jr . Sector Analysis Internalization Group Office of International Cooperation and Development U.S. Department of Agriculture September 1978 i 3 Rural Development Division Bureau for Latin America and the Caribbean Agency for International Development BESTAVAILABLE COPY WORKING DOCUMENT SERIES: CARIBBEAN REGION GENERAL WORKING DOCUMENT i\3 A SURVEY OF THE LITERATLTRE ON INCOME DISTRI13UTION AM> THE FULFILLMENT OF BASIC HUMAN NEEDS IN THE CARIBBEAN REGION* *Antigua, Barbados, Belize, British Virgin Is. , Cayman Is., Dominica, Grenada, Montserrat, St. Kitts-Nevis- (Anguilla), St. Lucia, St. Vincent, Turks & Caicos Is. Clarence Zuvekas , Jr . Sector Analysis Internalization Group Office of International Cooperation and Development U.S. Department of Agriculture September 1978 i I This document does not bear the approval (nor imply such) of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the United States Agency i for lnternationai Development, or any of j tneir offices. In view of its nacure as I G workiag paper, it should not be quoted I w!~hoci?erm;ssion of the originating O.:; -CZ. ,I; Any coinments wo"id be appreci- : L:2~, 6.;~can De addressed to the author , 6c: I 4112 ndditors Buiiding I I 14x1 & Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20250 BEST AVA MBLE COPY PREFACE Most of the data discussed in this survey were reviewed in an earlier document (Zuvekas 1978b) which presented a "profile" of small farmers in the Caribbean Region *I but was not intended to provide much interpretation or analysis.
  • The Emerging New Zealand Jurisprudence on Climate Change, Disasters and Displacement

    The Emerging New Zealand Jurisprudence on Climate Change, Disasters and Displacement

    MIGRATION STUDIES VOLUME 3 NUMBER 1 2015 131–142 131 The emerging New Zealand jurisprudence on climate change, disasters and displacement Jane McAdamà *Faculty of Law, University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Australia. Email: [email protected] Abstract Downloaded from In mid-2014, there was global media coverage of a decision by the New Zealand Immigration and Protection Tribunal, heralded as the first legal recognition of ‘climate change refugees’. Despite the hype, the Tribunal had made no such finding. The case concerned a family of four from the small Pacific island State of Tuvalu, who argued, http://migration.oxfordjournals.org/ among other things, that the effects of climate change—in particular, a lack of fresh drinking water and sea-level rise—would have adverse impacts on them if they were forced to return home. While the Tribunal ultimately permitted them to stay in New Zealand, this was not because of the impacts of climate change in Tuvalu, but rather because of their strong family ties within New Zealand. The decision was based purely on humanitarian and discretionary grounds, not on any domestic or international legal obligation. However, since 2013, New Zealand has started to specifically and systematically delineate the legal protection framework applicable to claims based on the impacts of climate change, natural disasters or environmental degradation. While no one has by guest on March 10, 2015 yet been granted protection on these grounds, New Zealand’s jurisprudence provides the most comprehensive analysis by decision-makers to date about the scope and content of protection for people escaping the impacts of climate change and disasters.
  • Kenya Election History 1963-2013

    Kenya Election History 1963-2013

    KENYA ELECTION HISTORY 1963-2013 1963 Kenya Election History 1963 1963: THE PRE-INDEPENDENCE ELECTIONS These were the last elections in pre-independent Kenya and the key players were two political parties, KANU and KADU. KADU drew its support from smaller, less urbanized communities hence advocated majimboism (regionalism) as a means of protecting them. KANU had been forced to accept KADU’s proposal to incorporate a majimbo system of government after being pressured by the British government. Though KANU agreed to majimbo, it vowed to undo it after gaining political power. The majimbo constitution that was introduced in 1962 provided for a two-chamber national legislature consisting of an upper (Senate) and lower (House of Representative). The Campaign KADU allied with the African People’s Party (APP) in the campaign. KANU and APP agreed not to field candidates in seats where the other stood a better chance. The Voting Elections were marked by high voter turnout and were held in three phases. They were widely boycotted in the North Eastern Province. Violence was reported in various parts of the country; four were killed in Isiolo, teargas used in Nyanza and Nakuru, clashes between supporters in Machakos, Mombasa, Nairobi and Kitale. In the House of Representative KANU won 66 seats out of 112 and gained working majority from 4 independents and 3 from NPUA, KADU took 47 seats and APP won 8. In the Senate KANU won 19 out 38 seats while KADU won 16 seats, APP won 2 and NPUA only 1. REFERENCE: NATIONAL ELECTIONS DATA BOOK By Institute for Education in Democracy (published in 1997).
  • Pacific Island Countries and Territories Issued: 19 February 2008

    Pacific Island Countries and Territories Issued: 19 February 2008

    OCHA Regional Office for Asia Pacific Pacific Island Countries and Territories Issued: 19 February 2008 OCHA Presence in the Pacific Northern Papua New Guinea Fiji Mariana Humanitarian Affairs Unit (HAU), PNG Regional Disaster Response Islands (U.S.) UN House , Level 14, DeloitteTower, Advisor (RDRA), Fiji Douglas Street, PO Box 1041, 360 Victoria Parade, 3rd Floor Fiji +10 Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea Development Bank Building, Suva, FIJI Tel: +675 321 2877 Tel: +679 331 6760, +679 331 6761 International Date Line Fax: +675 321 1224 Fax: +679 330 9762 Saipan Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Head: Vini Talai Head: Peter Muller Agana +12 Guam (U.S.) Pacific Ocean +10 MARSHALL ISLANDS Legend Depth (m) OCHA Presence Below 5,000 1,001 to 2,000 MICRONESIA (FSO) Koror Majuro Country capital Palikir 4,001 to 5,000 501 to 1,000 Territory capital PALAU +11 Illustrative boundary 3,001 to 4,000 101 to 500 +9 +10 Time difference with UTC 2,001 to 3,000 o to 100 Tarawa (New York: UTC -5 Equator NAURU Geneva: UTC +1) IMPORTANT NOTE: The boundaries on this map are for illustrative purposes only Yaren Naming Convention and were derived from the map ’The +12 +12 KIRIBATI UN MEMBER STATE Pacific Islands’ published in 2004 by the Territory or Associated State Secretariat of the Pacific Community. INDONESIA TUVALU -11 -10 PAPUA NEW GUINEA United Nations Office for the Coordination +10 +12 of Humanitarian affairs (OCHA) Funafuti Toke lau (N.Z.) Regional Office for Asia Pacific (ROAP) Honiara Executive Suite, 2nd Floor, -10 UNCC Building,
  • REVISION O F the AFRICAN Caeclllan GENUS

    REVISION O F the AFRICAN Caeclllan GENUS

    REVISION OFTHE AFRICAN CAEClLlAN GENUS SCHISTOMETOPUM PARKER (AMPH IBIA: CYMNOPHIONA: CAECILI IDAE) BY RONALD A. NU AND MICHAEL E. PFRENDER MISCELLANEC JS PUBLICATIONS MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, NO. 18Fb; ' Ann Arbor, September 2 7, 1 998 ISSN 076-8405 MIS(:ELIANEOUS PUBLICATIONS MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, LJNTVERSITY OF MICHIGAN NO. 187 The publicatioils of the M~~sclunof Zoology, The [Jniversity of Michigan, consist PI-irnarilyof two series-the Occasion:~lPapers allti the Miscellaneous Publicatio~ls.Both series were founded by Dc Bryant Walker, Mr. Rradshaw H. Swales, anti Dr. W.W. Newcornb. Occasionally the Museuni publishes contributiorls outside of these series; begirlnirlg in 1990 these are titled Special Publicatio~lsa~ld arc numbered. All submitted ~n;inl~scriptsreceive external review. The Misccllarieous Publications, which include ~l~ollographicstltdies, papers on field and ~II- seuln techniques, and other contributions 11ot within the scope of the Occasio~lalPapers, are pl~b- lishcd separately. It is not intended that they be grouped into volumes. Each 11r11nberhas a title page and, when necessary, a table of co1itelits. Tllc Occasional Papel-s, publication of which was begun in 1913, servc as a medium Sol- original studies based prirlcipally upon the collections in the Museurn. They are issurtl separately. MThen a sufficient number of pages has hcen printed to niakc a volume, a title pagc, table of contenb, and an index are supplied to libraries and individuals on the mailing list for the series. A cornplete list of publications on Birds, Fishes, Insects, Mammals, Moll~~sks,Rcpdles and Amphib- ians, and other topics is available. Address inquiries to the Directt)r, Muse~unof Zoolohy, The lir~ivcr- sity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigarl 48109-1079.
  • 2011 Tuvalu and Tokelau Drought

    2011 Tuvalu and Tokelau Drought

    2011 Tokelau and Tuvalu Drought Response LTCOL Terry McDonald Corps of Royal New Zealand Engineers New Zealand Defence Force Presentation Scope • Background and challenges • Deployment overview - OP Pacific Drought 2011 • Key focus areas: • “Humanitarian Assistance as a system of systems” • “Unpacking the problem” • “Information in a vacuum” • Conclusion Background and Challenges • Slow developing situation • Increasing development increases water use • Impact of La Nina on preceding six months rainfall • Reliance on rainwater capture and RO • Geographic Isolation – airfields / ports • Mission duration and footprint • NZDF MFRO capability Deployment overview – OP Pacific Drought 2011 Key Events Timeline: 28 Sep 11 – Tuvalu declares a state of emergency Sep 11 – Tokelau declares a state of emergency 30 Sep 11 – NZDF activates condition white OP Pacific Drought 04 Oct 11 – NZDF activates condition red OP Pacific Drought 05 Oct 11 – NZDF team TOKELAU deploys to AMERICAN SAMOA 06 Oct 11 – NZDF team TOKELAU links up with USCG WALNUT 07 Oct 11 – NZDF team TUVALU deploys to SAMOA 07 Oct 11 – Relief team TOKELAU arrives TOKELAU 08 Oct 11 – Relief team TUVALU arrives TUVALU 10 Oct 11 – Relief team TOKELAU RTNZ via AMERICAN SAMOA 09 Nov 11 – Relief team TUVLAU RTNZ via SAMOA Key Outcomes: TOKELAU – 123,000L of water produced and delivered to three atolls Distribution amount based on population TUVALU - 798,480L of water produced by NZDF MFRO Distribution primarily on Funafuti with Red Cross RO supporting NUKULAELAE References: http://www.tokelau.org.nz/site/tokelau/files/final%20final%20final%20tevakai%20NC.pdf
  • Partnership Fact Sheet

    Partnership Fact Sheet

    PARTNERSHIP FACT SHEET PORTMORE, JAMAICA + TOWNSVILLE, AUSTRALIA LOCATED IN THE ATLANTIC HURRICANE BELT, Portmore, Jamaica is extremely susceptible to hurricanes that RESULTS can cause severe flooding and widespread infrastructure damage. Portmore is a low-lying area on the southern coast of Jamaica. 1 Originally a predominantly agricultural area, the city transformed into a large residential community in the 1950s and became home Based off of a collective social learning for thousands of residents who worked in Kingston. Since then, workshop model from Townsville, the the population of Portmore has grown extremely rapidly, leading partnership hosted a workshop for 46 key it to become the largest residential area in the Caribbean. stakeholders from local government, civil society, and the national government in One of the greatest climate related risks to Portmore is the Portmore to prioritize climate actions that will potential impacts from tropical storms, storm surges and sea feed into Portmore’s Climate Action Plan. level rise. The coastal location of the city also renders it highly susceptible to incremental changes in sea levels and the potential 2 for inundation that will only worsen with future seal level rise. Portmore adopted climate education initiatives from Townsville that will work with students Recognizing that the city’s flood risk is increasing with the threat from elementary to high school on the of climate change, Portmore applied to be part of the CityLinks creation of sensors to monitor indoor energy partnership in the hopes of receiving technical assistance to better consumption and indoor temperatures. plan for future climate impacts. 3 After seeing the impacts white roofs had PARTNERING ON SHARED CLIMATE CHALLENGES in Townsville, Portmore is considering the Although, the distance between Townsville and Portmore design of municipal pilot projects that would couldn’t be greater, local government structure and shared encourage white roofs.
  • Country Profile – Papua New Guinea

    Country Profile – Papua New Guinea

    Country profile – Papua New Guinea Version 2011 Recommended citation: FAO. 2011. AQUASTAT Country Profile – Papua New Guinea. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome, Italy The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licencerequest or addressed to [email protected]. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/ publications) and can be purchased through [email protected].
  • The Secret History of Australia's Nuclear Ambitions

    The Secret History of Australia's Nuclear Ambitions

    Jim Walsh SURPRISE DOWN UNDER: THE SECRET HISTORY OF AUSTRALIAS NUCLEAR AMBITIONS by Jim Walsh Jim Walsh is a visiting scholar at the Center for Global Security Research at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. He is also a Ph.D. candidate in the Political Science program at MIT, where he is completing a dissertation analyzing comparative nuclear decisionmaking in Australia, the Middle East, and Europe. ustralia is widely considered tactical nuclear weapons. In 1961, of state behavior and the kinds of Ato be a world leader in ef- Australia proposed a secret agree- policies that are most likely to retard forts to halt and reverse the ment for the transfer of British the spread of nuclear weapons? 1 spread of nuclear weapons. The nuclear weapons, and, throughout This article attempts to answer Australian government created the the 1960s, Australia took actions in- some of these questions by examin- Canberra Commission, which called tended to keep its nuclear options ing two phases in Australian nuclear for the progressive abolition of open. It was not until 1973, when history: 1) the attempted procure- nuclear weapons. It led the fight at Australia ratified the NPT, that the ment phase (1956-1963); and 2) the the U.N. General Assembly to save country finally renounced the acqui- indigenous capability phase (1964- the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty sition of nuclear weapons. 1972). The historical reconstruction (CTBT), and the year before, played Over the course of four decades, of these events is made possible, in a major role in efforts to extend the Australia has gone from a country part, by newly released materials Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of that once sought nuclear weapons to from the Australian National Archive Nuclear Weapons (NPT) indefi- one that now supports their abolition.
  • 10. Deep and Shallow Restorative Peace

    10. Deep and Shallow Restorative Peace

    10. Deep and shallow restorative peace Table 10.1 tentatively characterises Bougainville as a ‘restorative peace’ rather than the much more common phenomena of a ‘realist’ or ‘liberal peace’. A table like this might help us better see a conflict through a comparative lens, at the same time as it simplifies too much. Hence, in the conclusion to this chapter, we will reach the view that while Bougainville had a comparatively deep restorative peace locally, across the region that restorative peace was shallow. In particular, there remains a shallow regional reconciliation and a shallow integrity of regional truth on the question of honouring the outcome of the forthcoming referendum on independence for Bougainville. Table 10.2 characterises Bougainville as bottom-up for truth and reconciliation, which again is quite unusual compared with very common war settlements of non-truth and top-down reconciliation. Bougainville had no top-down truth commission such as we have seen in various Latin American countries, or a South African-style Truth and Reconciliation Commission. So we see Bougainville as a case of deep bottom-up reconciliation and shallow regional truth. Regional elites in Port Moresby, Canberra, Wellington and Jakarta and in the boardroom of BCL now have obligations to enliven the integrity of regional dialogue about the Bougainville peace agreement. 133 ReconciliationandArchitecturesofCommitment Table 10.1 Accomplishing peace through political settlement, legal justice and restorative justice How peace is Political Adjudicated
  • UF in North Queensland, Australia: Sustaining Humans and the Environment Summer A, 2021 Itinerary Highlights

    UF in North Queensland, Australia: Sustaining Humans and the Environment Summer A, 2021 Itinerary Highlights

    UF in North Queensland, Australia: Sustaining Humans and the Environment Summer A, 2021 Itinerary Highlights Day 1 – 6 Magnetic Island amazing 305 meters into the Stony Creek Gorge and learn about the management plan. Bungalow Bay Koala Village During your stay at Bungalow Bay Koala Village you will learn about their role in conservation on the island. You will receive lectures from their rangers, visit their wildlife sanctuary, and hike through diverse habitats that are home to over 75 species of reptiles, mammals, and birds. Australian Wildlife Conservancy (AWC) AWC's reserves cover more than 7.4 million acres, including the critical conservation of Mt Zero and Taravale. Spend the day working on a range of service-learning activities, such as bush fire control methods of clearing brush, or business assessment and monitoring. Koala population study and beach scrub project Day 10 – 12 Mission Beach to Atherton You will participate in a field-based study surveying the local koala population while enjoying them in the wild, and Aboriginal cultural experience a project on beach scrub, learning about Conservation Learn about Nywaigi Aboriginal culture and hear the Action Planning, how to use camera traps, and conducting stories of their ancestors who were exhibited as cannibals fauna surveys. and savages in nineteenth century circuses in Europe and the US. Try your hand at traditional activities such as throwing boomerangs and spears and take part in a Day 7 – 9 Hidden Valley service-learning project on the Mungalla wetlands. Hidden Valley Cabins ecotourism Stay at a family-run ecotourism business with hosts that are passionate about the natural environment.