DOCSLIB.ORG

6.11.13 Handouts.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
6.11.13 Handouts.Pdf 042312-3 Updated 53 Regional Drive Concord, NH 03301 Phone: (603) 225-2978 Fax: (603) 225-0095 www.mjinc.com MEMORANDUM TO: Thomas Rafter, AAE, Nantucket Memorial Airport FROM: Zachary Staff, AICP, Airport Planner DATE: June 4, 2013 SUBJECT: PFC Rate & Project Analysis Update PROJECT NO.: 17874.00 Urgent For Review Please Comment Please Reply Please Recycle As discussed as part of the Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Application Kick-Off Meeting on April 5, 2013, several airports in the vicinity of Nantucket Memorial Airport charge PFCs to passengers. These airports include Barnstable Municipal Airport, Boston Logan International Airport, Tweed-New Haven Airport, and Bradley International Airport. According to the FAA, 355 airports charge PFCs, including 182 Primary-Non-Hub Airports. Each airport has the opportunity to select the PFC that is charged to passengers. Table 1 details the fees charged by airports across the county. Table 1: Range of Approved Passenger Facility Charge Rates (As of April 30, 2013) PFC Rate Number of Airports $1 0 $2 2 $3 35* $4 2 $4.50 331* *15 airports are approved to collect Passenger Facility Charges of $3 and $4.50 in the future and are counted in both rows. Source: http://www.faa.gov/airports/pfc/monthly_reports/media/airports.pdf As noted in the table above, no airports charge a PFC as low as $1, and two airports charge a PFC of $2. These airports are Barnstable Municipal Airport and LA/Ontario International Airport. There are also two airports that charge $4 per enplanements (Orlando Sanford International Airport and Fayetteville International Airport). The majority of other airports charge either $3 or the maximum, $4.50, and 15 have approvals to collect at both amounts into the future. It is important to note that additional considerations are necessary to collect PFCs at a rate greater than $3. At all airports, to collect a PFC of $4 or $4.50, it cannot be reasonably expected that the Airport Improvement Program (AIP) can fund the proposed projects, and that if projects proposed involve surface transportation of terminals, adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport must be identified. At airports designated as Medium Hub or Large Hub, additional requirements to collect PFCs at a rate of $4 or $4.50 must be met; however, any additional requirements are not applicable to Nantucket Memorial Airport due to its designation as a Non-Hub airport. A complete list of airports collecting PFCs, their rates, and the expiration date of their authorization to collect 1 PFC Rate & Project Analysis Update June 4, 2013 PFCs, can be found at the FAA’s PFC Monthly Reports website (http://www.faa.gov/airports/pfc/monthly_reports/media/airports.pdf). The PFCs are collected by the air carriers at the time of the ticket purchase. Airlines are required to segregate the funds from other revenue, and are permitted to retain $0.11 per PFC collected for administrative costs. The administrative cost collected is set and is not dependent on the PFC rate that is charged by an airport. The issuing air carrier will collect the PFC on behalf of all other air carriers utilized on an itinerary in both directions of an itinerary. For example, if a traveler originated their roundtrip on Aer Lingus in Dublin, Aer Lingus would submit the PFC to Nantucket, even though the flight from Nantucket may be on a codeshare or interline partner of Aer Lingus. Airlines are required to remit PFCs to the airport on a monthly basis and should occur within the month after the revenue is recorded in the accounting system of the airline. The airport also has the opportunity to designate classes of carriers where a PFC would not be collected. This is limited to classes where the number of annual enplaned passengers is not more than one percent of the total number of passengers enplaned at the airport. A review of the 2011 Air Carrier Activity Information System (ACAIS) report indicates that within the Nonscheduled/On-Demand Air Carriers, Filing FAA Form 1800-31 (ATCO) category, 875 enplanements were recorded. This equates to approximately 0.005% of the annual enplanements. At most airports, this class of air carriers is excluded as a result of the administrative burden, for both the air carriers within this group and the airport, in relation to the amount of revenue generated from the class of air carriers. A copy of the 2011 ACAIS report is attached. When considering a PFC rate for enplanements at Nantucket, the potential projects for which the PFC would be collected is an important consideration. Based on information from airport management, seven projects have been included in the preliminary considerations. The primary project is the local share of the recently recompleted renovation and expansion of the passenger terminal (determined by the FAA as 65% eligible for the use of AIP/PFC funds). If the entire local share of the terminal renovation and expansion utilized PFCs, the total combined AIP/PFC share would be approximately 58%, well below the eligibility threshold. With the addition of interest, $7,337,151 could be collected through PFCs to provide funds for the repayment of the annual debt service. All projects included in the initial analysis are identified in Table 2. Table 2: Potential Projects for PFC Collections Project Title PFC/Local Share Total Project Cost $4,500,000 (Bond Capital) Terminal Renovation & Expansion $31,950,826 $2,837,151 (Interest) Rehabilitate Runway Lighting $23,886 $955,444 Install Miscellaneous NAVAIDS $556 $22,222 Install Airfield Guidance Signs $833 $33,333 Master Plan Update $18,750 $750,000 Widen Taxiway D & Remove $9,375 $375,000 Runway 33 Pad PFC Application & Administration $35,000 $35,000 2 PFC Rate & Project Analysis Update June 4, 2013 With the inclusion of all projects, the PFC application would request $7,425,551. All projects would collect as “Impose & Use”, indicating that a subsequent PFC application would be unnecessary and that the airport could utilize PFCs for approved projects immediately. Per the request of the airport, an aircraft deicing vehicle may be eligible for PFC funds if the vehicle will be owned and operated by the airport and available for use by any aircraft, and could be included by the airport if desired as part of this application. When compared with potential PFC collection rates, in collaboration with forecasted future enplanements (anticipated with a conservative annual growth rate of 0.5%), the amount of time required to complete the collections varies, as summarized in Table 3 and displayed in greater detail in the attached documents. Table 3: Comparison of PFC Rates & Expected Charge Expiration Dates PFC Rate Charge Expiration Date $2 April 1, 2037 $3 April 1, 2029 $4 May 1, 2025 $4.50 February 1, 2024 NOTE: Charge Expiration Dates assume PFC collections begin on December 1, 2013. Due to the length of PFC collections, over 10 years in all scenarios, it is recommended that the Nantucket Memorial Airport consider collecting PFCs only for the local share of the renovation of the passenger terminal renovation and expansion and for the PFC Application & Administration costs. This will ease the PFC application process and review by the FAA and air carriers serving the airport, but will provide the necessary leverage for the airport to utilize PFCs for the long-term debt service payments associated with the terminal renovation and expansion. As the end of PFC collections approach, the airport will be able to apply to collect PFCs for additional projects. Further, while the airport could charge a PFC of $2 and complete collections just after the completion of debt service payments in 2036, it is recommended that the airport consider a PFC of $3 or greater to reduce the period of PFC collections, with an end date before 2030. If, during the air carrier coordination or public notice process it becomes necessary to change the proposed rate of PFC collections, decreasing the rate will typically not involve any further coordination effort or additions to the application timeline. Once the airport has finalized their selection of projects that will be included as part of the PFC application, McFarland Johnson will organize a teleconference with the airport and FAA New England Region’s PFC Specialist, to discuss the projects and the timeline for the upcoming application and to gain any early comments. While a decision on the collection rate is not required prior to the teleconference with FAA, it would be required shortly thereafter in order to begin completing the necessary documentation for FAA review prior to commencing the air carrier coordination process. 3 FAA - Office Of Airports Report Date 06/03/2013 Source CY 2011FAA ACAIS Enplanements by Air Carrier for Calendar Year 2011 Nantucket Memorial (ACK) ACK Thomas Rafter30 Airport Road, Nantucket, MA 02554 SCHEDULE TYPE |--------------- ENPLANEMENTS ----------------| CARRIER NAME (CARRIER CODE) SCHEDULED NONSCHEDULED TOTAL ATCO - Nonscheduled/On-Demand Air Carriers, filing FAA Form 1800-31. AirDialog LLC (L41A) 0 14 14 Blue Bell Air LLC (N22A) 0 5 5 Heritage Aviation Inc. (IGXA) 0 29 29 Meridian Air Group, Inc. (K1RA) 0 5 5 Priester Aviation LLC (PRIA) 0 2 2 Reliant Air Charter, Inc. (QREA) 0 820 820 ATCO Total 0 875 875 CAC - Commuters or Small Certificated Air Carriers, filing T-100. Cape Air (9K) 66,857 0 66,857 Commutair Aka Champlain Enterprises, Inc. (C5) 5,299 0 5,299 Island Airlines LLC (1DQ) 65,147 365 65,512 Tradewind Aviation LLC (04Q) 833 1,396 2,229 CAC Total 138,136 1,761 139,897 CRAC - Large Certificated Air Carriers, filing T-100. Air Wisconsin Airlines Corporation (ZW) 4,098 0 4,098 Avjet Corporation (0WQ) 0 2 2 Jetblue Airways Corporation (B6) 15,681 38 15,719 Mesaba Airlines (XJ) 4,022 0 4,022 Pinnacle Airlines, Inc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • G410020002/A N/A Client Ref
    Solicitation No. - N° de l'invitation Amd. No. - N° de la modif. Buyer ID - Id de l'acheteur G410020002/A N/A Client Ref. No. - N° de réf. du client File No. - N° du dossier CCC No./N° CCC - FMS No./N° VME G410020002 G410020002 RETURN BIDS TO: Title – Sujet: RETOURNER LES SOUMISSIONS À: PURCHASE OF AIR CARRIER FLIGHT MOVEMENT DATA AND AIR COMPANY PROFILE DATA Bids are to be submitted electronically Solicitation No. – N° de l’invitation Date by e-mail to the following addresses: G410020002 July 8, 2019 Client Reference No. – N° référence du client Attn : [email protected] GETS Reference No. – N° de reference de SEAG Bids will not be accepted by any File No. – N° de dossier CCC No. / N° CCC - FMS No. / N° VME other methods of delivery. G410020002 N/A Time Zone REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Sollicitation Closes – L’invitation prend fin Fuseau horaire DEMANDE DE PROPOSITION at – à 02 :00 PM Eastern Standard on – le August 19, 2019 Time EST F.O.B. - F.A.B. Proposal To: Plant-Usine: Destination: Other-Autre: Canadian Transportation Agency Address Inquiries to : - Adresser toutes questions à: Email: We hereby offer to sell to Her Majesty the Queen in right [email protected] of Canada, in accordance with the terms and conditions set out herein, referred to herein or attached hereto, the Telephone No. –de téléphone : FAX No. – N° de FAX goods, services, and construction listed herein and on any Destination – of Goods, Services, and Construction: attached sheets at the price(s) set out thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • I APPENDIX Page Tweed-New Haven Airport
    i APPENDIX Page Tweed-New Haven Airport Authority v. Tong, No. 17-3481-cv and No. 17-3918-cv, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Judgment entered July 9, 2019 ................................................ 1a Tweed-New Haven Airport Authority v. Jepsen, Case No. 3.15cv01731 (RAR), U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, Judgment entered October 3, 2017 ...................... 24a Tweed-New Haven Airport Authority v. Jepsen, Case No. 3.15cv01731 (RAR), U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, Ruling on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss entered December 9, 2016 .................................................. 68a Tweed-New Haven Airport Authority Act, C.G.S.A. § 15-120g et seq. ...................................... 88a Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution, Article VI, Clause 2 ....................... 108a Connecticut Constitution, Article Tenth, § 1 ......... 108a Federal Aviation Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 40103 ............. 109a 14 C.F.R. § 139.1 ..................................................... 111a 1a 930 F.3d 65 United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. TWEED-NEW HAVEN AIRPORT AUTHORITY, Plaintiff-Appellant, City of New Haven, Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William TONG, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Connecticut, Defendant-Appellee.* No. 17-3481-cv; 17-3918-cv | August Term 2018 | Argued: December 12, 2018; | Decided: July 9, 2019 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, No. 15 Civ. 1731 (RAR), Robert A. Richardson, Magistrate Judge, Presiding. Attorneys and Law Firms Hugh I. Manke, John C. King, Christopher A. Klepps, Updike, Kelly & Spellacy, P.C., Hartford, Ct., for plaintiff-appellant Tweed-New Haven Airport Authority. John Rose, Jr., Corporation Counsel, New Haven Office of the Corporation Counsel, New Haven, Ct., for intervenor plaintiff-appellant Tweed-New Haven Airport Authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ ES1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Business Plan Process .................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Airport Profile .............................................................................................................. 3 2.0 EXISTING AIRPORT CHARACTERISTICS............................................................................ 5 2.1 Physical Characteristics ............................................................................................... 5 2.2 Existing Airport Tenants .............................................................................................. 6 2.3 Management Structure ............................................................................................... 7 2.4 Historical Airport Data ................................................................................................. 8 2.5 Baseline Financial Data ................................................................................................ 9 3.0 AIRPORT MARKET AREA .............................................................................................. 11 4.0 SWOT ANALYSIS FOR WATERBURY-OXFORD AIRPORT ................................................. 15 4.1 SWOT Components ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ACRP 03-31 Bibliography Last Update: June 15, 2016
    ACRP 03-31 Bibliography Last Update: June 15, 2016 Contents Air Cargo ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Air Service ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 Economic....................................................................................................................................................... 9 Environmental ............................................................................................................................................. 13 Finance ........................................................................................................................................................ 16 Land Use ..................................................................................................................................................... 18 Media Kit ..................................................................................................................................................... 19 Noise ........................................................................................................................................................... 21 Role of the Airport ....................................................................................................................................... 23 ACRP 03-31: Resources Bibliography Page
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of Transportation Federal
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ORDER TRANSPORTATION JO 7340.2E FEDERAL AVIATION Effective Date: ADMINISTRATION July 24, 2014 Air Traffic Organization Policy Subject: Contractions Includes Change 1 dated 11/13/14 https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/CNT/3-3.HTM A 3- Company Country Telephony Ltr AAA AVICON AVIATION CONSULTANTS & AGENTS PAKISTAN AAB ABELAG AVIATION BELGIUM ABG AAC ARMY AIR CORPS UNITED KINGDOM ARMYAIR AAD MANN AIR LTD (T/A AMBASSADOR) UNITED KINGDOM AMBASSADOR AAE EXPRESS AIR, INC. (PHOENIX, AZ) UNITED STATES ARIZONA AAF AIGLE AZUR FRANCE AIGLE AZUR AAG ATLANTIC FLIGHT TRAINING LTD. UNITED KINGDOM ATLANTIC AAH AEKO KULA, INC D/B/A ALOHA AIR CARGO (HONOLULU, UNITED STATES ALOHA HI) AAI AIR AURORA, INC. (SUGAR GROVE, IL) UNITED STATES BOREALIS AAJ ALFA AIRLINES CO., LTD SUDAN ALFA SUDAN AAK ALASKA ISLAND AIR, INC. (ANCHORAGE, AK) UNITED STATES ALASKA ISLAND AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. UNITED STATES AMERICAN AAM AIM AIR REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AIM AIR AAN AMSTERDAM AIRLINES B.V. NETHERLANDS AMSTEL AAO ADMINISTRACION AERONAUTICA INTERNACIONAL, S.A. MEXICO AEROINTER DE C.V. AAP ARABASCO AIR SERVICES SAUDI ARABIA ARABASCO AAQ ASIA ATLANTIC AIRLINES CO., LTD THAILAND ASIA ATLANTIC AAR ASIANA AIRLINES REPUBLIC OF KOREA ASIANA AAS ASKARI AVIATION (PVT) LTD PAKISTAN AL-AAS AAT AIR CENTRAL ASIA KYRGYZSTAN AAU AEROPA S.R.L. ITALY AAV ASTRO AIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. PHILIPPINES ASTRO-PHIL AAW AFRICAN AIRLINES CORPORATION LIBYA AFRIQIYAH AAX ADVANCE AVIATION CO., LTD THAILAND ADVANCE AVIATION AAY ALLEGIANT AIR, INC. (FRESNO, CA) UNITED STATES ALLEGIANT AAZ AEOLUS AIR LIMITED GAMBIA AEOLUS ABA AERO-BETA GMBH & CO., STUTTGART GERMANY AEROBETA ABB AFRICAN BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATIONS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF AFRICAN BUSINESS THE CONGO ABC ABC WORLD AIRWAYS GUIDE ABD AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC ICELAND ATLANTA ABE ABAN AIR IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC ABAN OF) ABF SCANWINGS OY, FINLAND FINLAND SKYWINGS ABG ABAKAN-AVIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION ABAKAN-AVIA ABH HOKURIKU-KOUKUU CO., LTD JAPAN ABI ALBA-AIR AVIACION, S.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter V: Transportation
    Transportation CHAPTER V: TRANSPORTATION A. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS Located at the junction of Interstate 91 and Interstate 95, as well as a key access point to the Northeast Corridor rail line, New Haven is the highway and rail gateway to New England. It is the largest seaport in the state and the region and also the first city in Connecticut to have joined the national complete streets movement in 2008 by adopting the City’s Complete Streets Design Manual, balancing the needs of all roadway users including pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists. Journey to Work Data For a U.S. city of its size, New Haven has substantial share (45 Aerial view of New Haven seaport: largest in the state and the region. percent) of commuters who use a form of transportation other than driving alone. Approximately 15 percent of all commuters travel via carpool, close to 14 percent walk to work, while over 11 percent use a form of public transportation. Of the 10 largest cities in New England, only Boston has a higher percentage of residents who travel to work via non-motorized transportation. Also, out of this same group of cities, New Haven ranked highest in the percentage of people who walked to work. New Haven Vision 2025 V-1 Transportation Vehicular Circulation There are 255 miles of roadway in the city, ranging from Interstate highways to purely local residential streets. Of these roadways, 88 percent are locally-maintained public roads and 12 percent are state-maintained roads and highways. There are 43 locally- maintained bridges in the city.
    [Show full text]
  • (VWP) Carriers
    Visa Waiver Program (VWP) Signatory Carriers February 1, 2020 In order to facilitate the arrival of Visa Waiver Program (VWP) passengers, carriers need to be signatory to a current agreement with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). A carrier is required to be signatory to an agreement in order to transport aliens seeking admission as nonimmigrant visitors under the VWP (Title 8, U.S.C. § 1187(a)(5). The carriers listed below are currently signatory to the VWP and can transport passengers under the program. The date indicates the expiration of the current signed agreement. Agreements are valid for 7 years. If you transport VWP passengers and are not a signatory carrier, fines will be levied. Use the following link to apply to CBP to become a Signatory Carrier: https://www.cbp.gov/travel/international-visitors/business-pleasure/vwp/signatory-status # 21st Century Fox America, Inc. (04/07/2022) 245 Pilot Services Company, Inc. (01/14/2022) 258131 Aviation LLC (09/18/2020) 4770RR, LLC (12/06/2023) 51 CL Corp. (06/23/2024) 51 LJ Corporation (02/01/2023) 650534 Alberta, Inc. d/b/a Latitude Air Ambulance (01/09/2024) 711 CODY, Inc. (02/09/2025) A A&M Global Solutions, Inc. (09/03/2021) A.J. Walter Aviation, Inc. (01/17/2021) A.R. Aviation, Corp. (12/30/2022) Abbott Laboratories Inc. (08/26/2026) AbbVie US LLC (10/15/2026) Abelag Aviation NV d/b/a Luxaviation Belgium (02/27/2026) ABS Jets A.S. (05/07/2025) ACASS Canada Ltd. (02/27/2026) Accent Airways LLC (01/12/2022) Ace Flight Center Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Signatory Visa Waiver Program (VWP) Carriers
    Visa Waiver Program (VWP) Signatory Carriers January 9, 2020 In order to facilitate the arrival of VWP passengers, carriers need to be signatory to a current agreement. This agreement is a precursor for transporting aliens seeking admission as nonimmigrant visitors under the Visa Waiver Program. The carriers below are signatory to the VWP and can transport passengers under the program. The date indicates the last signed agreement. Agreement are valid for 7 years. If you transport VWP passengers and are not a signatory carrier, fines will be levied. Use the following link to apply to CBP to become a Signatory Carrier: https://www.cbp.gov/travel/international-visitors/business-pleasure/vwp/signatory-status # 21st Century Fox America, Inc. (04/07/2022) 245 Pilot Services Company, Inc. (01/14/2022) 258131 Aviation LLC (09/18/2020) 4770RR, LLC (12/06/2023) 51 CL Corp. (06/23/2024) 51 LJ Corporation (02/01/2023) 650534 Alberta, Inc. d/b/a Latitude Air Ambulance (01/09/2024) 711 CODY, Inc. (02/09/2025) A A&M Global Solutions, Inc. (09/03/2021) A.J. Walter Aviation, Inc. (01/17/2021) A.R. Aviation, Corp. (12/30/2022) Abbott Laboratories Inc. (08/26/2026) AbbVie US LLC (10/15/2026) Abelag Aviation NV d/b/a Luxaviation Belgium (02/27/2026) ABS Jets A.S. (05/07/2025) ACASS Canada Ltd. (02/27/2026) Accent Airways LLC (01/12/2022) Ace Flight Center Inc. (07/09/2026) ACE Flight Operations a/k/a ACE Group (09/20/2022) ACG Logistics LLC (02/25/2026) ACM Air Charter Luftfahrtgesellschaft GmbH (02/22/2025) ACP Jet Charter, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Opinion Letter to the Wicks Group PLLC on Aug. 22, 2009
    U,S,Department Office of the Chief Counsel 800 Independence Ave., S,w. of Transportation Washington, D.C. 20591 Federal Aviation Administration Glenn P. Wicks, Esq. Roncevert D. Almond, Esq. AUG 222008 The Wicks Group PLLC 1215 17th Street, N.W. Sumner Square, Fourth Floor Washington, D.C. 20036 RE: Opinion on the Runway Safety Area Project at Tweed-New Haven Airport Dear Messrs. Wicks and Almond: This is in response to your request for an opinion on the power of non-proprietors to regulate airport development within the existing boundaries of an airport. In the context of the Town of East Haven's use of its zoning powers to prevent Tweed-New Haven Airport (Airport) from enlarging its runway safety areas' (RSAs) at each end of its air carrier runway, you ask specifically whether "a non-proprietor municipality's improper attempts to regulate the construction of an aviation safety project being carried out by the [Airport] Authority, an airport sponsor, entirely within the boundaries of the Airport and under the authority, approval, and supervision of the federal and state governments," would be federally preempted. Based upon the information in your letter and articulated below, our conclusion is that the Town of East Haven is federally preempted from using its police powers to prevent the Airport from attempting to comply with current FAA RSA standards, as recently mandated by Congress, through enlarging its sub-standard RSAs at either end of Runway 2/20 to meet those standards. 1. Background: The Tweed-New Haven Regional Airport Authority is the sponsor of the Tweed-New Haven Regional Airport (Airport).
    [Show full text]
  • March Newsletter 2014
    ISA+21 International Society of Women Airline Pilots March 2014 ISA+21 Chairwoman Nancy “N2” Novaes reports: Mary Ana Gilbert designed our We have just concluded another fabulous WAI Conference. New new banner, member signups have brought our membership to renewed heights; above, to our Scholarship awards were significant, generous and heartfelt. Best generate of all, the professional “face” of ISA+21’s new booth underscored our interest and importance for women airline pilots and women seeking entry into our excitement in field. New banners, new booth setup and an updated logo polished our our organization image and drew crowds. But don’t let me “blow” the good news at Women in reported elsewhere in this newsletter! Suffice it for me to say that Aviation. Membership, Scholarship and WAI are ISA’s “Stars of March.” So read on….. New Members: 2, 13 Ask Amelia: 3-4 It’s a Woman’s World: 5-6 Moscow Conference: 7 Member News: 8-9 In Memory of: 11-12 Scholarship Winners: 14 Emily Warner Howell Honored: 10 Women in Aviation: 15-16 !1 ISA+21 International Society of Women Airline Pilots March 2014 How do you spell Success? Can you say 300? ISA$Welcomes$49$New$Members$ January$15$–$March$15,$2014$ And$a$big$“Welcome$Back”$to$all$our$returning$members.$$$ $$$We$are$glad$to$have$you$with$us$again…304$and$sKll$climbing!$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Melinda$Albert$ Moraim$Egurbida$Maldonado$$ Devan$Norris$ Kama$Arseneaux$ Margaret$Eickhoff$ Gretchen$Palmer$ Pamela$Barber$ Kimberly$Ewing$ Beth$Phelps$ Valerie$Barre_$ Lindsey$Glasow$ Louise$Pole$ Chriselda$Beltran$
    [Show full text]
  • NCAA Bowl Eligibility Policies
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 2019-20 Bowl Schedule ..................................................................................................................2-3 The Bowl Experience .......................................................................................................................4-5 The Football Bowl Association What is the FBA? ...............................................................................................................................6-7 Bowl Games: Where Everybody Wins .........................................................................8-9 The Regular Season Wins ...........................................................................................10-11 Communities Win .........................................................................................................12-13 The Fans Win ...................................................................................................................14-15 Institutions Win ..............................................................................................................16-17 Most Importantly: Student-Athletes Win .............................................................18-19 FBA Executive Director Wright Waters .......................................................................................20 FBA Executive Committee ..............................................................................................................21 NCAA Bowl Eligibility Policies .......................................................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report for More Details on the Definition of Direct and Indirect Impacts1 and the Study Methodology
    TABLE OF CONTENTS NEW YORK STATEWIDE AIRPORT ECONOMIC IMPACTS STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... i 1. STUDY CONTEXT: NATIONAL AVIATION INDUSTRY & ECONOMIC FACTORS.........................................................................................................3 1.1 Impacts of the Global Economic Recession on Aviation in New York ..................3 1.2 Review of Other Economic Impact Studies .............................................................9 1.3 Activity at New York’s Commercial Service and GA Airports ............................11 1.4 Air Cargo’s Role in New York’s Economy ...........................................................17 1.5 Strategies for Revenue Generation and Increased Airport Economic Output .......20 1.6 NextGen Implementation and Anticipated Benefits in New York ........................33 2. STATEWIDE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF AVIATION ....................................................36 2.1 Job Impacts ............................................................................................................36 2.2 Income Impacts ......................................................................................................42 2.3 Output Impacts .......................................................................................................47 2.4 State & Local Tax Revenue Impacts .....................................................................52 2.5 Local Economic Impact .........................................................................................55
    [Show full text]