(Gafsp) Private Sector Window Agribusiness Country Diagnostic

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(Gafsp) Private Sector Window Agribusiness Country Diagnostic GLOBAL AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SECURITY PROGRAM (GAFSP) PRIVATE SECTOR WINDOW AGRIBUSINESS COUNTRY DIAGNOSTIC – MOZAMBIQUE February 2016 DRAFT PUBLIC Document Submitted by: Cambridge Economic Policy Associates Ltd CONTENTS List of Abbreviations ........................................................................................................ iii Executive summary .......................................................................................................... 6 ES.1 Background ................................................................................................................ 6 ES.2 Phase1: Analyze/identify the most promising sub-sectors and commodities for IFC/GAFSP investment and advisory services ........................................................................ 7 ES.3 Phase 2: Identify specific IFC/GAFSP investment opportunities and related partners .................................................................................................................................. 11 ES.4 Structure of the Report ............................................................................................ 17 1. PHASE 1 Report ....................................................................................................... 18 2. PHASE 2 Report ........................................................................................................... 75 ii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AAM Cotton Association of Mozambique ACA African Cashew Alliance ACi African Cashew Initiative ACIANA Commercial and Industrial Association of Nampula ADIPSA Development Assistance for Private Sector Agriculture Initiative ADNAP bNational Fisheries Administration AECF Africa Enterprise Challenge Fund AfDB African Development Bank AGOA African Growth and Opportunity Act AGRA Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa AIA Agro Industrials Associados (Association of Agribusiness Industries) AICAJU Association of Cashew Manufacturers AMOMIF Associacao Mocambicana de Operadores de Microfinancas AMU Banana association of Mozambique APAMO Cane Growers Association (Associação das Empresas Produtoras de Açúcar de Moçambique) APCM Association of Shrimp Producers ASCA Accumulative Savings and Credit Association BMI Business Monitor International CCOM Caixas Comunitárias de Operadores de Microfinanças CEPAGRI Centre for Promotion of Agriculture CIMSAN Namialo Center for Cotton Seed Research and Multiplication COMESA Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa COMPACI Competitive African Cotton Initiative CPI Investment Promotion Agency DNA National Distributor of Sugar DNEA National Directorate of Agrarian Extension DNPDR National Directorate for Promotion of Rural Development iii EP Fisheries school ETG Export Trading Group EPA Economic Partnership Agreement FARE Fund for Economic Rehabilitation FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation FBO Farmer-based Organisation FDI Foreign Direct Investment FFP Fisheries Development Fund FONPA National Forum for Cotton Producers GOT Ginning Out-Turn IAM Cotton Institute of Mozambique IDFC International Fertiliser Development Centre IDPPE Institute for development of small-scale fisheries IFAD International Fund for Agricultural Development IFPRI International Food Policy Research Institute IIAM Agrarian Research Institute of Mozambique IIP National institute for fisheries research IITA International Institute of Tropical Agriculture INA The Mozambique Sugar Institute INAQUA Instituto Nacional de Desenvolvimento da Aquacultura (National Institute for Aquaculture Development) INCAJU Cashew Promotion Institute INIP National Institute for Fisheries Inspection IRRI International Rice Research Institute MIC Ministry of Industry and Trade MIM Maize Intensification in Mozambique MINAG Ministry of Agriculture NRDS National Rice Development Strategy PARP Action Plan for the Reduction of Poverty PEDSA Strategic Plan for the Development of the Agricultural Sector PESPA Strategic Plan for the Artisanal Fishing Sub-sector iv PNISA National Agriculture Investment Plan for the Agrarian Sector PROIRRI Mozambique Sustainable Irrigation Development Project PRONEA National Programme for Agricultural Extension PQG Government Five-Year Plan RFSP Rural Finance Support Programme SADC Southern African Development Community SEMOC Sementes de Moçambique SHF Smallholder Farmer SIDA Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency SNP National Planning System UNCDF United Nations Capital Development Fund UNDP United Nations Development Program v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES. 1: Background The International Finance Corporation (IFC) manages the Private Sector Window of the Global Agriculture and Food Security Program (GAFSP - PrSW), which is a multilateral mechanism to assist in the implementation of pledges made by the G20 in Pittsburgh, USA in September 2009. GAFSP established a private sector window to provide long and short term loans, credit guarantees, equity and advisory services to support private sector activities for improving agricultural development and food security. Through the blending of IFC finance and GAFSP finance, investments can be financed which are commercially viable, but have temporary higher costs and/or higher risks than the investments which IFC normally finances, and justify a concessional element in the financing package. The objective of the IFC managed private sector window is to address the following: 1. Support and demonstrate new and innovative financing aimed at agribusiness companies and their supply chains, 2. Help increase productivity, improve market access, support innovation and development of new ideas in financing and technology, reduce information asymmetries between small end users of capital and financial institutions, and reduce risks associated with financing small holders/companies in the agribusiness sector 3. Support projects that foster research, development and innovations through entities operating in the ‘last mile’ and projects that can demonstrate higher productivity, lower use of water resources and inputs such as fertilizers As a means to reach this objective, IFC contracted Cambridge Economic Policy Associates (CEPA) to conduct an agribusiness sector diagnostic of Mozambique to i.) analyze/identify the most promising sub-sectors and commodities for IFC/GAFSP investment and advisory services and ii.) identify specific IFC/GAFSP investment opportunities and related partners. This analysis would include competitiveness benchmarking to examine investment and trade patterns and evaluate the competitiveness of specific agri sub-sectors and value chains, as well as considering ―strategic‖ entry points for advisory, namely water/irrigation, women, climate change as well as skills development, mechanization, technology and other potential areas. Particularly important to the diagnostic process would be the country specific national planning work on food security, including CAADP, National Agricultural Investment Program. This report presents the results of a 2 phase assignment, which aimed to identify three to five agribusiness sectors in CDI that have the potential to deliver significant growth and development impacts for CDI as well as investment opportunities for GAFSP PrSW/IFC. Phase 1 reviewed a long list of sectors using a two stage assessment process to identify the priority sectors: 6 i.) Review FAOStat data looking at the top-50 sectors by export value and by production value to identify ten sectors worth looking at in more detail. ii.) Analyse each sector gathering quantitative data and reviewing the sectors’ competitive strengths and weaknesses; main sector participants; and providing an overview of the recent investment activity in the sector. ES.2 Phase1: Analyze/identify the most promising sub-sectors and commodities for IFC/GAFSP investment and advisory services The long-list of sectors were reviewed against five criteria, summarised below. Table ES.2.2: Criteria and indicators used to identify priority sectors Criteria Indicators Development Estimated number of smallholder farmers in sector impact Contribution to food security Economic impact Average value of production of crop over last five years Average value of exports/ imports over last five years Competitiveness Yield per hectare achieved compared to world’s top five producers Change in the share of global exports over time Growth forecast for domestic market Enabling Qualitative view on the quality of the policy environment environment Qualitative view on the level of donor support received Investment Qualitative view on the level of private sector activity in sector potential Qualitative view on the amount of recent investment activity Each indicator was scored between 1 (lowest) to 5; the maximum score is 55. Table ES.2 presents the data and ES.3 summarises the scores. Given the nature of the agribusiness sector in Mozambique, it is necessary to use the desk-based analysis to consider a wide range of sectors. A number of the sectors that have been reviewed are quite small and so there is no data available to assess the sectors. In these cases we have provided a more qualitative review of the sectors. The judgements are summarised in Table ES.3. 7 Table ES.2: Data for long-list sectors Sector Development Economic Competitiveness Enabling Investment Support Ave. value Yield as % Change in Policy Private Investment No. of Ave. daily Ave. value Growth from of exports of export environment activity activity smallholders calories $m forecast donors $m competitors share score score score score
Recommended publications
  • Transport Guide by Road Buses Are the Cheapest Mode of Transport In
    Getting Around Mozambique: Transport Guide by newsdesk By Road Buses are the cheapest mode of transport in Mozambique but regular services only operate between major towns where roads are in motorable condition. In rural areas, people negotiate rides and fares on converted passenger trucks (chapa-cems) or regular trucks (camions). On the services that do operate, carry food and water as the stops are literally few and far between. Foreigners should also ensure all their travel documents are in order and must carry them on their person as the authorities conduct regular and strict checks for documentation. Cabs are rarely available outside the main cities but there are plenty of car rental firms happy to hire vehicles to foreigners who pay in hard currency. For those planning to drive themselves, insist on hiring a sturdy 4WD and check its roadworthiness. An International Driving Permit is necessary, traffic drives on the left of the road and insurance is recommended. There is a fairly extensive network of gas stations along the major routes though not in the reserves and game parks. Driving after dark outside of the cities can be dangerous as car hijackings and highway robberies are commonplace. Stray cattle and vehicles without headlamps are the other hazard on country roads, which are anyway, poorly maintained. The bus service in the capital, Maputo is better than most and actually covers a large amount of territory. The long-distance bus depot is on Avenida 24 de Julho just beyond Praca 16 de Junho in Maputo. In all the cities, taxis are metered and drivers still expect to be tipped.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of EU Support to the Transport Sector in Africa 2005-2013 Final Report Volume 4A Synthesis Country Case Studies June 2016 ______
    Evaluation of EU support to the transport sector in Africa 2005-2013 Final Report Volume 4A Synthesis country case studies June 2016 ___________ Evaluation carried out on behalf of the European Commission International Cooperation Evaluation of EU Supportand toDevelopment the Transport Sector in Africa 2005-2013 1 EuropeAid Consortium composed of ECDPM, Ecorys, Lattanzio, Mokoro and Particip Leader of the Consortium: Ecorys Framework Contract Lot 1: Multi‐country evaluation studies of economic sectors/themes of EC external cooperation Specific Contract N°2013/330827 This evaluation was commissioned by the Evaluation Unit of the Directorate General for International Cooperation and Development – EuropeAid (European Commission) Evaluation Team John Clifton (Team Leader) Klaus Broersma Max Hennion Basile Keita Mark Watson Project Director: Martin van der Linde Project Manager: Michiel Modijefsky Management assistant: Kim Groenewegen The opinions expressed in this document represent the authors’ points of view, which are not necessarily shared by the European Commission or the authorities of the countries involved. © cover picture rights Evaluation of EU Support to the Transport Sector in Africa 2005-2013 3 This evaluation has been carried out by: ECORYS Nederland B.V. Watermanweg 44 3067 GG Rotterdam P.O. Box 4175 3006 AD Rotterdam The Netherlands T +31 (0)10 453 88 00 F +31 (0)10 453 07 68 E [email protected] Registration no. 24316726 W www.ecorys.nl Evaluation of EU Support to the Transport Sector in Africa 2005-2013 4 Annex 4A: Synthesis of the country case studies of the evaluation of EU support to the transport sector in Africa 2005-2013 Table of Content Glossary of acronyms ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cyclone Idai
    Cyclone Idai Activation: 2019 Cyclone Idai Situation Report 2 – period covered: March 19 - 20, 2019 Prepared by: Humanity Road Situation Overview Highlights: Humanity Road activated on Thursday to monitor the impacts of cyclone Idai on Mozambique. We are providing the below report compiled through social media monitoring and official reports. Access online https://www.humanityroad.org/situation-reports/africa/mozambique-flooding-march-2019 Beira City remains cut-off from surrounding areas, with the N6 national road between Tica and Nhamatanda (85 kilometres from Beira) now impassable. Parts of Beira Port – including the grain terminal, warehouses and coal terminal – sustained damage. However, the container terminal and oil terminal did not sustain any major damage, according to preliminary reports. Several vessels ran aground near the Port and salvage operations are underway to clear the area. source Translators without Borders @TranslatorsWB is supporting Humanity Road with translation services for Mozambique situation reporting. Twitter handles Facebook pages @Humanityroad Humanity Road @DisasterAnimals Animals in Disaster @jAIDdog VOST Portugal @DAFNReady @VOSTPT About Humanity Road: Founded in 2010 as a 501(c)3 non-profit corporation, Humanity Road is a leader in the field of online disaster response. Through skilled and self-directed work teams, Humanity Road and its network of global volunteers aim to provide the public and disaster responders worldwide with timely and accurate aid information. Providing such information helps individuals
    [Show full text]
  • Mozambique Transaction Cost Study
    Mozambique Transaction cost study Research commissioned by the CTA Draft 2 October 2008 1 Introduction Africa, compared to other regions, has the highest incidence of poverty. With research showing a positive link between exports and growth, a rise in exports out of Africa is essential for sustained growth of the continent. However, Africa has been unsuccessful to capture the international market and make use of this vehicle to steer away from poverty. How can this situation be altered? Until now the private sector has contributed very little to growth in Africa, mainly due to the crowding out by the public sector. There is a growing consensus amongst researchers that a thriving private sector is crucial for sustained economic growth and a thriving export sector. The remaining question is what role government should play. The two extremes seem to be on the one hand a government that steers the export sector in a specific direction; and on the other a government that plays no further role than to create an environment supportive of the private sector. The effectiveness of special enterprise support schemes, in which ‘wise’ planners detect a need, throw resources at it, and micro-engineer the outcomes, has been questioned in research. The World Bank publications are highly sceptical about deliberate government action aimed at improving the performance of enterprises and developing competitive advantages. They warn that strategies that claim to pick winners can go spectacularly wrong and are expensive gambles with public funds. The alternative is to decrease the role of government by reforming the regulatory environment for business, for example the simplification of business registration procedures as well as reforms of labour regulations and property titling (UNIDO).
    [Show full text]
  • Popular Protests in Mozambique, 2008-2012 Luís De Brito, Egídio Chaimite, Crescêncio Pereira, Lúcio Posse, Michael Sambo and Alex Shankland Maputo, October 2014
    Hunger Revolts and Citizen Strikes: Popular protests in Mozambique, 2008-2012 Luís de Brito, Egídio Chaimite, Crescêncio Pereira, Lúcio Posse, Michael Sambo and Alex Shankland Maputo, October 2014 1 HUNGER REVOLTS AND CITIZEN STRIKES: POPULAR PROTESTS IN MOZAMBIQUE, 2008-2012 This is an Open Access report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode To cite this report: de Brito, L., E. Chaimite, C. Pereira, L. Posse, M. Sambo and A. Shankland (2014) ‘Hunger Revolts and Citizen Strikes: Popular protests in Mozambique, 2008-2012’. Food Riots and Food Rights project report. Brighton/Maputo: Institute of Development Studies/Instituto de Etudos Sociais e Economicos. www.foodriots.org This research has been generously funded by the UK Department for International Development-Economic and Social Research Council (DFID-ESRC) Joint Programme on Poverty Alleviation (Grant reference ES/ J018317/1). Caption: Residents of Maputo rush to buy bread as wheat runs short and food prices rise in Mozambique in May 2008 (Photo: ILRI/Mann) Design & Layout: Job Mwanga ii RESEARCH, PROCESS AND METHODOLOGY ABOUT THIS WORKING PAPER SERIES The green revolution and the global integration of food markets were supposed to relegate scarcity to the annals of history. So why did thousands of people in dozens of countries take to the streets when world food prices spiked in 2008 and 2011? Are food riots the surest route to securing the right to food in the twenty-first century? We know that historically, food riots marked moments of crisis in the adjustment to more market-oriented or capitalist food and economic systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Questions on Productive Development in Mozambique
    Questions on productive development in Mozambique Carlos Nuno Castel-Branco, Nelsa Massingue & Carlos Muianga (editors) IESE Questions on productive development in Mozambique Carlos Nuno Castel-Branco, Nelsa Massingue and Carlos Muianga (editors) Questions on productive development in Mozambique BACKGROUND PAPERS FOR THE DANIDA PROJECT, ‘ADVOCACY AND RESEARCH FOR PRIVAte-secTOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT programme’ (PSBDP 2011–2015), COORDINATED BY THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT Fund (FAN) Carlos Nuno Castel-Branco, Nelsa Massingue and Carlos Muianga (editors) www.iese.ac.mz Títle Questions on productive development in Mozambique Editors Carlos Nuno Castel-Branco, Nelsa Massingue and Carlos Muianga Design and layout COMPRESS.dsl Proofreading COMPRESS.dsl Printing and finishing Compress.dsl Register No. 8378/RLINLD/2015 ISBN 978–989–8464–25–5 Print run 500 Editor’s address Av. Tomás Nduda 1375 Maputo Mozambique September 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This collection is a result of collaboration between the Institute for Social and Economic Studies (IESE) and the Business Environment Fund (FAN) and aims to transform the results of the research that has been carried out by the IESE in order to promote public-policy debate related to the development of productive capacities and business in Mozambique. The editiors of this collection would like to thank the authors of the papers and the FAN team and its partners for their valuable and critical contributions and for the suggestions. Acknowledgement is also extended to business associations, the Confederation of Business Associations (CTA), unions, the media, and all who contributed to the production and diffusion of, and debate on, the selected topics. In particular, we would like to thank the following IESE partners for their continuing institutional support: the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), the Royal Danish Embassy, the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland, the Irish Department of Foreign Affairs (Irish Cooperation), IBIS Mozambique, and the Embassy of Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • Mozambique – Trade and Transport Facilitation Audit
    47785 Public Disclosure Authorized MOZAMBIQUE – TRADE AND TRANSPORT FACILITATION AUDIT Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Submitted to: World Bank Submitted by: René Meeuws NEA Transport research and training Reference: R20040164/30144/rme/lwi Rijswijk, The Netherlands, August 2004 Public Disclosure Authorized Mozambique – Trade and transport facilitation audit CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................5 2 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................7 3 OVERVIEW OF THE MOZAMBICAN ECONOMY .............................9 4 TRADE PATTERNS..........................................................................15 5 INFRASTRUCTURE AND TRANSPORT POLICIES .......................23 5.1 Transport infrastructure.................................................................................23 5.2 Transport policy and the organization of the transport sector.......................35 5.3 Regulatory framework for the transport sector .............................................37 6 TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS SERVICES....................................43 7 COSTS AND DELAYS OF TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS ...........49 8 CUSTOMS AND TRADE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ........55 8.1 Customs administration and Customs procedures.........................................55 8.2 Trade regulations and trade procedures.........................................................59 9 TRANSPORT AND DEVELOPMENT CORRIDORS........................62
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study on Transport Infrastructure Value Chain in South Africa and Mozambique1
    Regional Industrialization Research project: Case study on Transport infrastructure value chain in South Africa and Mozambique1 Basani Baloyi and Tatenda Zengeni CCRED 31 March 2015 1 This paper was done as part of a project on regional value chains funded by TIPS (www.tips.org.za ). The views are those of the authors alone. 1 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 5 2. The Construction Value Chain ............................................................................ 7 2.1 The particular nature of construction ........................................................... 7 3. Mapping the regional rail infrastructure development: a case of Mozambique and South Africa ............................................................................................................ 15 3.1 Mozambique: Overview of Coal Developments and Transport Infrastructure ....................................................................................................... 16 3.2. Mapping transport infrastructure projects and activity in Mozambique- The case of Moatize ................................................................................................... 21 3.3 Description of Basic Rail Infrastructure and Main Inputs............................ 24 4. Case study of Moatize ......................................................................................... 28 4.1 Construction activities cost breakdown .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mozambique Operational Plan (COP/ROP) 2017 Strategic Direction Summary
    Mozambique Operational Plan (COP/ROP) 2017 Strategic Direction Summary Table of Contents 1.0 Goal Statement ....................................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 Epidemic, Response, and Program Context ............................................................................................ 6 2.1 Summary statistics, disease burden and country profile .................................................................... 6 2.2 Investment Profile ............................................................................................................................. 15 2.3 National Sustainability Profile Update .............................................................................................. 20 2.4 Alignment of PEPFAR investments geographically to disease burden ............................................. 20 2.5 Stakeholder Engagement .................................................................................................................. 22 3.0 Geographic and Population Prioritization ............................................................................................. 25 4.0 Program Activities for Epidemic Control in Scale-Up Locations and Populations ................................ 27 4.1 Targets for scale-up locations and populations ................................................................................ 27 4.2 Priority Populations Prevention .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Information and Knowledge Sharing Workshop for ILO Chief Technical Advisers and National Project Cordinators in Africa
    Information and Knowledge Sharing Workshop for ILO Chief Technical Advisers and National Project Cordinators in Africa Nairobi, 15 – 17 February 2010 International Labour Organization Copy right © Inter na tio nal Labour Orga ni za tion 2010 First published 2010 Publi ca tions of the Inter na tio nal Labour Office enjoy copy right under Pro to col 2 of the Uni ver sal Copy right Con ven - tion. Never the less, short excerpts from them may be repro du ced without autho ri zation, on condi tion that the source is indi ca ted. For rights of repro duc tion or trans la tion, appli ca tion should be made to ILO Publi ca tions (Rights and Per mis sions), Inter na tio nal Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Swit zer land, or by email: pub [email protected]. The Inter na tio nal Labour Office wel co mes such appli ca tions. Libra ries, ins ti tu tions and other users regis te red with repro duc tion rights orga ni za tions may make copies in accor - dance with the licen ces issued to them for this pur pose. Visit www.ifrro.org to find the repro duc tion rights orga ni za- tion in your country. Infor ma tion and Kno wledge Sha ring Work shop for ILO Chief Tech ni cal Advi sers and Natio nal Pro ject Coor di na tors in Africa : Nairobi, 15 - 17 February 2010 9789221236375 (print) 9789221236382 (web pdf) ILO Cata lo guing in Publi ca tion Data Infor ma tion and kno wledge sharing work shop for ILO Chief Tech ni cal Advi sers and Natio nal Pro ject Coor di na tors in Africa : Nai robi, 15 - 17 February 2010 / Inter na tio nal Labour Office.- Geneva: ILO, 2010 1 v.
    [Show full text]
  • Mozambique: Desk Study of Extension and Advisory Services Developing Local Extension Capacity (DLEC) Project January 2018
    Mozambique: Desk Study of Extension and Advisory Services Developing Local Extension Capacity (DLEC) Project January 2018 Acknowledgements Written by Benedito Cunguara and Todd Thompson in collaboration with Kristin Davis of IFPRI, this analysis was compiled for the DLEC project under USAID Cooperative Agreement No. AID-OAA- L-16-00002. This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of Digital Green and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.” Developing Local Extension Capacity 2 CONTENTS Contents .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 8 Conceptual Framework ..................................................................................................................................... 8 Methods ............................................................................................................................................................. 11 Results ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Transport Policy Proposal for Mozambique
    Urban Transport Policy Proposal for Mozambique June 2008 This publication was produced by Nathan Associates Inc. for review by the United States Agency for International Development. Urban Transport Policy Proposal for Mozambique DISCLAIMER This document is made possible by the support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Its contents are the sole responsibility of the author or authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States government. Contents Executive Summary iii 1. Introduction 1 Objective 1 Background 1 2. Urban Transport Problems in Maputo 3 Excessive Fares 3 Irregular, Inadequate, and Unreliable Services 4 Poorly Maintained Vehicles 5 Badly Driven Vehicles 5 Inadequate Operator Income 5 Traffic Congestion 6 sustainability 6 What Can be Done? 7 3. Public Transport Policy and Regulatory Framework 9 Policy 9 Regulatory Framework 10 4. Public Transport Industry Structure 15 Public Sector Operations 15 Private Sector Operations 16 Infrastructure 18 5. Costs and Revenues 19 6. Policy Objectives and Options 23 Possible Objectives 23 Policy Elements 25 II U RBAN T RANSPORT P OLICY FOR M OZAMBIQUE 7. Recommendations 33 The Vision 33 Regulation and Competition 34 Industry Ownership and Structure 35 Division of Responsibility 36 Funding 37 Route Network 38 Vehicle Types 38 Infrastructure 39 Application to Other Cities 40 8. Next Steps 43 Improve Enforcement of Regulations 43 Encourage Owners to Form Cooperatives or Companies 43 Encourage Use of Larger Buses 44 Review Route Network 44 Review fare Structure and Levels 44 Review Position of Publicly Owned Bus Companies 45 Pilot project—Demonstrate Concessions on Selected Routes 45 Transport Master Plan for Maputo 45 Clarify Public Transport Policy 46 Create Urban and National Transport Authorities 46 Build Capacity 46 Potential Benefits 46 Appendix.
    [Show full text]