DOCSLIB.ORG

Czech Republic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Czech Republic Czech Republic 2016 Country Review http://www.countrywatch.com Table of Contents Chapter 1 1 Country Overview 1 Country Overview 2 Key Data 3 Czech Republic 4 Europe 5 Chapter 2 7 Political Overview 7 History 8 Political Conditions 15 Political Risk Index 41 Political Stability 55 Freedom Rankings 71 Human Rights 83 Government Functions 85 Government Structure 87 Principal Government Officials 99 Leader Biography 101 Leader Biography 101 Foreign Relations 102 National Security 114 Defense Forces 116 Chapter 3 118 Economic Overview 118 Economic Overview 119 Nominal GDP and Components 126 Population and GDP Per Capita 128 Real GDP and Inflation 129 Government Spending and Taxation 130 Money Supply, Interest Rates and Unemployment 131 Foreign Trade and the Exchange Rate 132 Data in US Dollars 133 Energy Consumption and Production Standard Units 134 Energy Consumption and Production QUADS 136 World Energy Price Summary 137 CO2 Emissions 138 Agriculture Consumption and Production 139 World Agriculture Pricing Summary 142 Metals Consumption and Production 143 World Metals Pricing Summary 146 Economic Performance Index 147 Chapter 4 159 Investment Overview 159 Foreign Investment Climate 160 Foreign Investment Index 163 Corruption Perceptions Index 176 Competitiveness Ranking 188 Taxation 197 Stock Market 198 Partner Links 198 Chapter 5 199 Social Overview 199 People 200 Human Development Index 201 Life Satisfaction Index 205 Happy Planet Index 216 Status of Women 225 Global Gender Gap Index 228 Culture and Arts 237 Etiquette 240 Travel Information 242 Diseases/Health Data 252 Chapter 6 258 Environmental Overview 258 Environmental Issues 259 Environmental Policy 260 Greenhouse Gas Ranking 261 Global Environmental Snapshot 272 Global Environmental Concepts 284 International Environmental Agreements and Associations 298 Appendices 322 Bibliography 323 Czech Republic Chapter 1 Country Overview Czech Republic Review 2016 Page 1 of 335 pages Czech Republic Country Overview CZECH REPUBLIC Following World War I, the closely related Czechs and Slovaks of the former Austro-Hungarian Empire merged to form Czechoslovakia. Czechoslovakia was invaded and occupied by the Nazi Germany during World War II, and after the war it fell within the Soviet sphere of influence. The country had been under communist rule since the late 1940s. The "Prague Spring" of 1968 for liberal reforms was crushed by Soviet tanks, and anti-Soviet demonstrations the following year ushered in a period of harsh repression. With the collapse of Soviet authority in 1989, Czechoslovakia regained its freedom through a peaceful "Velvet Revolution." In January 1993, Czechoslovakia was broken up as the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic were simultaneously and peacefully founded. The Czech Republic joined NATO in 1999 and the European Union in 2004. Among the transition countries in Central and Eastern Europe, the Czech Republic is one of the most stable and prosperous and has one of the most developed and industrialized economies. Its strategic location in Europe and skilled workforce has attracted strong inflows of foreign direct investment, which have been an important contributor to its economic strength. Note, however, that since 2008 -- the time of the global financial crisis -- the Czech Republic has been subject to no shortage of economic woes. Czech Republic Review 2016 Page 2 of 335 pages Czech Republic Key Data Key Data Region: Europe Population: 10129510 Climate: Temperate; cool summers; cold, cloudy, humid winters. Languages: Czech, Slovak Currency: 1 koruna (Kc) = 100 haleru National Liberation Day is 8 May, Den slovanskych verozvestu Cyrila a Holiday: Metodeje is 5 July Area Total: 78703 Area Land: 78645 Coast Line: 0 Czech Republic Review 2016 Page 3 of 335 pages Czech Republic Czech Republic Country Map Czech Republic Review 2016 Page 4 of 335 pages Czech Republic Europe Regional Map Czech Republic Review 2016 Page 5 of 335 pages Czech Republic Czech Republic Review 2016 Page 6 of 335 pages Czech Republic Chapter 2 Political Overview Czech Republic Review 2016 Page 7 of 335 pages Czech Republic History Although a Czechoslovak state did not emerge until 1918, its roots go back many centuries. The earliest records of Slavic inhabitants in the modern republics of Czech and Slovakia date from the fifth century C.E. (Common Era). The ancestors of the Czechs settled in present-day Bohemia and Moravia, and those of the Slovaks settled in the present-day Slovak Republic. The settlers developed an agricultural economy and built the characteristically circular Slavic villages, the "okroulice." The peaceful life of the Slavic tribes was shattered in the sixth century by the invasion of the Avars, a people of undetermined origin and language who established a loosely connected empire between the Labe (Elbe) and Dnieper rivers. The Avars did not conquer all the Slavic tribes in the area, but they subjugated some of them and conducted raids on others. It was in response to the Avars that Samo - a foreigner thought to be a Frankish merchant - unified some of the Slavic tribes and, in 625 C.E., established the empire of Samo. Although the territorial extent of the empire is not known, it was centered in Bohemia and is considered the first coherent Slavic political unit. The empire disintegrated when Samo died in 658 C.E. A more stable polity emerged in Moravia. The Czech tribes of Moravia helped Charlemagne destroy the Avar Empire (ca. 796 C.E.) and were rewarded with part of the defeated empire's territory. Although the Moravians paid tribute to Charlemagne, they did enjoy considerable independence. Early in the ninth century, Mojmir, a Slavic chief, formed the Moravian Kingdom. His two successors expanded its domains to include Bohemia, Slovakia, southern Poland, and western Hungary. The expanded kingdom became known as the Great Moravian Empire. Its importance to Czechoslovak history is that it united in a single state the ancestors of the Czechs and Slovaks. The Great Moravian Empire was located at the crossroad of two civilizations: the German lands in the West and Byzantium in the East. From the West the Franks (a Germanic people) conducted destructive raids into Moravian territory, and German priests and monks came to spread Christianity in its Roman form among the Slavs. From Byzantium, Eastern Christian rites and liturgy in the Slavic language were introduced. A new Slavonic script, the Cyrillic alphabet, was devised. In 885, the Great Moravian Empire was drawn into the sphere of influence of the Roman Catholic Church. As a result, the Czechs and Slovaks adopted the Latin alphabet and became Czech Republic Review 2016 Page 8 of 335 pages Czech Republic further differentiated from the Eastern Slavs, who continued to use the Cyrillic alphabet and adhered to Eastern Orthodoxy. The Magyars invaded the territory held by the Czechs and Slovaks in 907. They entered the region as semi-nomadic pastoralists; soon developed settled agricultural communities; and held the territory until the Ottoman conquest in the sixteenth century. With the arrival of the Magyars, the Great Moravian Empire disintegrated. The chiefs of the Czech tribes in Bohemia broke from the tribes in Moravia and swore allegiance instead to the Frankish emperor Arnulf. The political center for the Czechs shifted to Bohemia, where a new political unit, the Bohemian Kingdom, would soon develop. The Magyars established the Kingdom of Hungary, which included a sizeable part of the former Great Moravian Empire (almost all of modern-day Slovakia). The Magyar invasion had profound long-term consequences, for it meant that the Slavic people of the Kingdom of Hungary - the ancestors of today's Slovaks - would be separated politically from the western areas, inhabited by the ancestors of the Czechs for nearly a millennium. This separation was a major factor in the development of distinct Czech and Slovak nationalities. As noted above, the Bohemian Kingdom emerged in the 10th century. The Premyslid chiefs - members of the Cechove, a tribe from which the Czechs derive their name - unified neighboring Czech tribes and established a form of centralized rule. Cut off from Byzantium by the Hungarian presence, the Bohemian Kingdom existed in the shadow of the Holy Roman Empire. After a struggle with Poland and Hungary, the Bohemian Kingdom acquired Moravia in 1029. Moravia, however, continued to be a separate margravate, usually ruled by a younger son of the Bohemian king. Because of complex dynastic arrangements, Moravia's link with the Bohemian Kingdom between the eleventh and sixteenth centuries was occasionally severed; during such interludes Moravia was subordinated directly to the Holy Roman Empire or to Hungary. Although Moravia's fate was intertwined with Bohemia's, in general, Moravia did not participate in Bohemia's civil and religious struggles. The main course of Czech history evolved in Bohemia proper. In several instances, the Bohemian Kingdom had the possibility of becoming a Czech national monarchy. The failure to establish a native dynasty, however, prevented such an outcome and left the fate of the Bohemian Kingdom to dynastic politics and foreign rulers. Although the Bohemian Kingdom evolved neither into a national monarchy nor into a Czech nation-state, the memory of it served as a source of inspiration and pride for modern Czech nationalists. Early in the 16th century, the Turks conquered part of the Kingdom of Hungary; the rest came under Habsburg rule. Thus began almost three centuries of Habsburg rule for both Bohemia and Slovakia. Although the Bohemian Kingdom, the Margravate of Moravia, and Slovakia were all under Habsburg rule, they followed different paths of development. Because the Turks took most of Hungary proper, until Hungary's re-conquest by the Habsburgs in the second half of the seventeenth century, Slovakia became the center of Hungarian political, cultural, and economic life. Czech Republic Review 2016 Page 9 of 335 pages Czech Republic The Habsburg kings of Hungary were crowned in Bratislava, the present-day capital of Slovakia, and the Hungarian estates met there.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bus& 101 Introduction to Business Readings and Workbook Course Designer: Leslie Lum Academic Year 2010-2011 Funded by the Ga
    Bus& 101 Introduction to Business Readings and Workbook Course Designer: Leslie Lum Academic Year 2010-2011 Revised 5/11 Funded by the Gates Foundation/State Board Open Course Initiative 5/28/2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 Thirty Second Commercial 22 Resume 6 COMPANY ANALYSIS 24 DOING THE COMPANY ANALYSIS 25 Writing Self Assessment (Courtesy Robin Jeffers) 42 Company Selection 26 Company Research 29 Company Analysis- Marketing 37 Company Financial Analysis 38 Company Management Paper 39 Company Presentation 41 Links to sample student paper 42 Team Writing Assignment 47 Team Research Scavenger Assignment 49 MODULE 1: THE CONTEXT OF BUSINESS 51 Module 1 Goals 51 The Economy 52 GDP: One of the Great Inventions of the 20th Century 52 Economic Growth 55 World’s Economies 56 GDP per capita 66 Inflation 69 Business Cycles 74 Government and Policy 77 Fiscal Policy 77 Monetary Policy 79 Currency Risk 80 Economic Indicators 81 Individual Assignment – Calculating growth rates 85 Team Assignment - Economic Indicators 86 Team Assignment – Costco Case 91 Commanding Heights A Case Study of Bubbles 147 Module 1 Questions for Timed Writes 148 2 MODULE 2 - ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND LEGAL FORMS OF BUSINESS 149 Businesses and Entrepreneurship 150 Forms of Ownership 155 Choosing the Business Structure 158 Starting a Business – The Business Plan 159 Breakeven Analysis 167 Team Assignment – Forms of Business 171 Team Assignment – Entrepreneurship and Business Plan 173 Team Assignment Optional - Breakeven analysis of your business plan 174 Module 2 Questions
    [Show full text]
  • Men's 200M Final 23.08.2020
    Men's 200m Final 23.08.2020 Start list 200m Time: 17:10 Records Lane Athlete Nat NR PB SB 1 Richard KILTY GBR 19.94 20.34 WR 19.19 Usain BOLT JAM Olympiastadion, Berlin 20.08.09 2 Mario BURKE BAR 19.97 20.08 20.78 AR 19.72 Pietro MENNEA ITA Ciudad de México 12.09.79 3 Felix SVENSSON SWE 20.30 20.73 20.80 NR 20.30 Johan WISSMAN SWE Stuttgart 23.09.07 WJR 19.93 Usain BOLT JAM Hamilton 11.04.04 4 Jan VELEBA CZE 20.46 20.64 20.64 MR 19.77 Michael JOHNSON USA 08.07.96 5 Silvan WICKI SUI 19.98 20.45 20.45 DLR 19.26 Yohan BLAKE JAM Boudewijnstadion, Bruxelles 16.09.11 6 Adam GEMILI GBR 19.94 19.97 20.56 SB 19.76 Noah LYLES USA Stade Louis II, Monaco 14.08.20 7 Bruno HORTELANO-ROIG ESP 20.04 20.04 8 Elijah HALL USA 19.32 20.11 20.69 2020 World Outdoor list 19.76 +0.7 Noah LYLES USA Stade Louis II, Monaco (MON) 14.08.20 19.80 +1.0 Kenneth BEDNAREK USA Montverde, FL (USA) 10.08.20 Medal Winners Stockholm previous 19.96 +1.0 Steven GARDINER BAH Clermont, FL (USA) 25.07.20 20.22 +0.8 Divine ODUDURU NGR Clermont, FL (USA) 25.07.20 2019 - IAAF World Ch. in Athletics Winners 20.23 +0.1 Clarence MUNYAI RSA Pretoria (RSA) 13.03.20 1. Noah LYLES (USA) 19.83 19 Aaron BROWN (CAN) 20.06 20.24 +0.8 André DE GRASSE CAN Clermont, FL (USA) 25.07.20 2.
    [Show full text]
  • First English Civil War (1642-46), the Second English Civil War (1648) and the Third English Civil War (1649-51)
    CIVIL WAR OF ENGLAND The English Civil War happened in the middle 17th century. The term civil war is a war where the sides involved in the fighting are from the same country. At the centre, there was a struggle between King Charles I and the Parliament of England over how England should be ruled. The King wanted to rule without Parliament telling him what to do. At first Parliament wanted to reduce the King's power, but later it decided that the country did not need a king. King Charles's supporters were known as the Royalists, and were nicknamed "Cavaliers". Parliament's supporters were known as the Parliamentarians, and were nicknamed "Roundheads". From 1639 to 1653, there was fighting in England, Scotland and Ireland, three separate countries that were ruled by the same king. The fighting that took place in each of these countries broke out at different times and for different reasons. In England, it lasted from 1642 to 1651. Some people think of this as one big war, while others think of it as three separate wars: the First English Civil War (1642-46), the Second English Civil War (1648) and the Third English Civil War (1649-51). The wars are also sometimes known as the Wars of the Three Kingdoms, including the Bishops' Wars in Scotland in 1639 to 1640 and the Irish Rebellion from 1641 to 1653. The Parliamentarians won the war. Charles I was captured, put on trial and in 1649 he was executed. His son CharlesII then tried to take over the country, but lost and escaped abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Krizový Management ODS Od Roku 2013 Po Současnost
    MASARYKOVA UNIVERZITA Fakulta sociálních studií Katedra politologie Krizový management ODS od roku 2013 po současnost Diplomová práce Bc. Nikola Pechtorová Vedoucí práce: Obor: Politologie Mgr. Otto Eibl, Ph.D. UČO: 385739 Brno 2017 Chtěla bych tímto poděkovat vedoucímu své práce Mgr. Otto Eiblovi, Ph.D. za jeho ochotu, cenné rady, komentáře a přátelský přístup po celou dobu tvorby této diplomové práce. Dále bych ráda poděkovala své rodině a příteli za pomoc a podporu, které se mi po celou dobu studia, i teď v jeho závěru, dostávaly. Prohlášení o autorství práce Prohlašuji, že jsem svou diplomovou práci na téma Krizový management ODS od roku 2013 po současnost vypracovala samostatně a za použití zdrojů uvede- ných v seznamu literatury. V Brně dne 28. května 2017 ................................................................ Abstract Pechtorová, N. Crisis management of ODS from 2013 to the present. Master thesis. Brno, 2017. The thesis studies causes of the ODS crise, which was associated with the events of the year 2013, the mechanisms and methods of solution used by ODS during the crise. The theoretical part is devoted to concepts, which dealing with crises ma- nagement, crisis communication, reputation and damaged image of the party. The research part is devoted to the analysis of the causes of ODS crisis, based on the construction of the image of the crisis, which was built on the basis of contempo- rary media, social networks and available documents. Subsequently, I analyze how the ODS used the solution to the crisis. There are used interviews with Miroslava Němcová and Petr Fiala. The aim of the thesis is to identify the causes of the crisis and analyze its solution.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: List of Interviews
    Appendix: List of Interviews The unification of Germany 1) APELT Andreas, Berlin, 23 October 2007. 2) BERGMANN-POHL Sabine, Berlin, 13 December 2007. 3) BIEDENKOPF Kurt, Berlin, 5 December 2007. 4) BIRTHLER Marianne, Berlin, 18 December 2007. 5) CHROBOG Jürgen, Berlin, 13 November 2007. 6) EGGERT Heinz, Dresden, 14 December 2007. 7) EPPELMANN Rainer, Berlin, 21 November 2007. 8) GAUCK Joachim, Berlin, 20 December 2007. 9) GLÄSSNER Gert-Joachim, Berlin, 7 November 2007. 10) HELBIG Monika, Berlin, 5 November 2007. 11) HOFMANN Gunter, Berlin, 30 July 2007. 12) KERWIEN Antonie, Berlin, 31 October 2007. 13) KLINGST Martin, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 7 December 2006. 14) KLOSE Hans-Ulrich, Berlin, 31 October 2007. 15) KRAA Detlev, Berlin, 31 October 2007. 16) KRALINSKI Thomas, Potsdam, 16 October 2007. 17) LENGSFELD Vera, Berlin, 3 December 2007. 18) LIPPERT Barbara, Berlin, 25 July 2007. 19) MAIZIÈRE Lothar de, Berlin, 4 December 2007. 20) MAIZIÈRE Thomas de, Berlin, 20 November 2007. 21) MECKEL Markus, Berlin, 29 November 2007. 22) MERTES Michael, Boston, Massachusetts, 17 November 2006. 23) MEYER Hans Joachim, Berlin, 13 December 2007. 24) MISSELWITZ Hans, Berlin, 6 November 2007. 25) MODROW Hans, Berlin, 28 November 2007. 26) MÜLLER Hans-Peter, Berlin, 13 November 2007. 27) NOOKE Günther, Berlin, 27 November 2007. 28) PAU Petra, Berlin, 13 December 2007. 29) PLATZECK Matthias, Potsdam, 12 December 2007. 30) SABATHIL Gerhard, Berlin, 31 October 2007. 31) SARAZZIN Thilo, Berlin, 30 November 2007. 32) SCHABOWSKI Günther, Berlin, 3 December 2007. 33) SCHÄUBLE Wolfgang, Berlin, 19 December 2007. 34) SCHRÖDER Richard, Berlin, 4 December 2007. 35) SEGERT Dieter, Vienna, 18 June 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • The Year in Elections, 2013: the World's Flawed and Failed Contests
    The Year in Elections, 2013: The World's Flawed and Failed Contests The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Norris, Pippa, Richard W. Frank, and Ferran Martinez i Coma. 2014. The Year in Elections 2013: The World's Flawed and Failed Contests. The Electoral Integrity Project. Published Version http://www.electoralintegrityproject.com/ Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11744445 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA THE YEAR IN ELECTIONS, 2013 THE WORLD’S FLAWED AND FAILED CONTESTS Pippa Norris, Richard W. Frank, and Ferran Martínez i Coma February 2014 THE YEAR IN ELECTIONS, 2013 WWW. ELECTORALINTEGRITYPROJECT.COM The Electoral Integrity Project Department of Government and International Relations Merewether Building, HO4 University of Sydney, NSW 2006 Phone: +61(2) 9351 6041 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.electoralintegrityproject.com Copyright © Pippa Norris, Ferran Martínez i Coma, and Richard W. Frank 2014. All rights reserved. Photo credits Cover photo: ‘Ballot for national election.’ by Daniel Littlewood, http://www.flickr.com/photos/daniellittlewood/413339945. Licence at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0. Page 6 and 18: ‘Ballot sections are separated for counting.’ by Brittany Danisch, http://www.flickr.com/photos/bdanisch/6084970163/ Licence at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0. Page 8: ‘Women in Pakistan wait to vote’ by DFID - UK Department for International Development, http://www.flickr.com/photos/dfid/8735821208/ Licence at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering Sudetenland: on the Legal Construction of Ethnic Cleansing Timothy W
    Maurer School of Law: Indiana University Digital Repository @ Maurer Law Articles by Maurer Faculty Faculty Scholarship 2006 Remembering Sudetenland: On the Legal Construction of Ethnic Cleansing Timothy W. Waters Indiana University Maurer School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Waters, Timothy W., "Remembering Sudetenland: On the Legal Construction of Ethnic Cleansing" (2006). Articles by Maurer Faculty. Paper 324. http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/324 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by Maurer Faculty by an authorized administrator of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Remembering Sudetenland: On the Legal Construction of Ethnic Cleansing TIMOTHY WILLIAM WATERS* I. To Begin: Something Uninteresting, and Something New ......... 64 II. A im s of the A rticle ................................................................. 66 1II. An Attempt at an Uncontroversial Historical Primer .............. 69 A. Czechoslovakia and Munich .......................................... 69 B. The Bene§ D ecrees ........................................................ 70 C. The Expulsions or Transfers .......................................... 73 D. The Potsdam Agreement ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Czech Foreign Policy in the Asia Pacific
    CHAPTER 11 Chapter 11 The Czech Foreign Policy in the Asia Pacific IMPROVING BALANCE, MOSTLY UNFULFILLED POTENTIAL Rudolf Fürst, Alica Kizeková, David Kožíšek Executive Summary: The Czech relations with the People’s Republic of China (PRC, hereinafter referred to as China) have again generated more interest than ties with other Asian nations in the Asia Pacific in 2017. A disagreement on the Czech-China agenda dominated the political and media debate, while more so- phisticated discussions about the engagement with China were still missing. In contrast, the bilateral relations with the Republic of Korea (ROK) and Japan did not represent a polarising topic in the Czech public discourse and thus remained largely unpoliticised due to the lack of interest and indifference of the public re- garding these relations. Otherwise, the Czech policies with other Asian states in selected regions revealed balanced attitudes with both proactive and reactive agendas in negotiating free trade agreements, or further promoting good relations and co-operation in trade, culture, health, environment, science, academia, tour- ism, human rights and/or defence. BACKGROUND AND POLITICAL CONTEXT In 2017, the Czech foreign policy towards the Asia Pacific1 derived from the Concept of the Foreign Policy of the Czech Republic,2 which referred to the region as signifi- cant due to the economic opportunities it offered. It also stated that it was one of the key regions of the world due to its increased economic, political and security-related importance. Apart from the listed priority countries – China, Japan, and South Korea, as well as India – the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the re- gion of Central Asia are also mentioned as noteworthy in this government document.
    [Show full text]
  • Czech-Israeli Intergovernmental Consultations Joint Statement Prague, May 17, 2012 Today, May 17, 2012, the Government of the C
    Czech-Israeli Intergovernmental Consultations Joint Statement Prague, May 17, 2012 Today, May 17, 2012, the Government of the Czech Republic and the Israeli Government are holding their intergovernmental consultations in Prague. The Prime Minister of the Czech Republic, Mr. Petr Ne čas, and the Prime Minister of the State of Israel, Mr. Benjamin Netanyahu, note with satisfaction the friendship and the historical partnership between the two countries, the unrelenting reciprocal support, the mutual respect for each other's sovereign status and the joint recognition in the political, defense and economic requirements of the two countries. The Prime Ministers emphasize their aspiration to further strengthen the close relations between the two Governments and the unique ties between the two peoples, based on a thousand-year-old affinity between the Czech people and the Jewish people. The Prime Ministers wish to thank all those who work tirelessly to advance the ties between the two countries. The following are the Government members participating in the consultations: On the Czech Republic side: Prime Minister Petr Ne čas First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs , Karel Schwarzenberg Minister of Industry and Trade, Martin Kuba Minister of Education, Youth and Sports, Petr Fiala Minister of Labor and Social Affairs, Jaromír Drábek Minister of Transport, Pavel Dobeš Minister for Regional Development, Kamil Jankovský Minister of Culture, Alena Hanáková On the Israeli side: Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu Deputy Prime Minister
    [Show full text]
  • The Monkey Cage "Democracy Is the Art of Running the Circus from the Monkey Cage." -- H.L
    11/5/13 The Czech paradox: Did the winner lose and the losers win? Sign In SUBSCRIBE: Home Delivery Digital Real Estate Rentals Cars Today's Paper Going Out Guide Find&Save Service Alley PostT V Politics Opinions Local Sports National World Business Tech Lifestyle Entertainment Jobs More The Monkey Cage "Democracy is the art of running the circus from the monkey cage." -- H.L. Mencken What's The Monkey Cage? Archives Follow : The Monkey Cage The Czech paradox: Did the winner lose and the losers win? BY TIM HAUGHTON, TEREZA NOVOTNA AND KEVIN DEEGAN-KRAUSE October 30 at 5:45 am More 3 Comments Also on The Monkey Cage Is the nonproliferation agenda stuck in the Cold War? Make-up artists prepare the Czech Social Democrat (CSSD) chairman Bohuslav Sobotka for his TV appearance after early parliamentary elections finished, in Prague, on Saturday, Oct. 26, 2013. (CTK, Michal Kamaryt/ Associated Press) [Joshua Tucker: Continuing our series of Election Reports, we are pleased to welcome the following post-election report on the Oct. 25-26 Czech parliamentary elections from political scientists Tim Haughton (University of Birmingham, UK), Tereza Novotna (Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium) and Kevin Deegan-Krause, (Wayne State University), who blogs about East European politics at the excellent Pozorblog. Deegan-Krause's pre-election report is available here.] ***** Czech party politics used to be boring. The 2013 parliamentary election, however, highlights the transformation of the party system, the arrival of new entrants and the woes faced by the long-established parties. The Czech Social Democratic Party (CSSD) won the election, but the margin of victory was slender.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Learning, Fast and Slow: Market-Oriented Reforms of Czech and Polish Healthcare Policy, 1989-2009
    Policy Learning, Fast and Slow: Market-Oriented Reforms of Czech and Polish Healthcare Policy, 1989-2009 Tamara Popić Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of Political and Social Sciences of the European University Institute Florence, 24 November 2014 (defence) European University Institute Department of Political and Social Sciences Policy Learning, Fast and Slow: Market-Oriented Reforms of Czech and Polish Healthcare Policy, 1989-2009 Tamara Popić Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of Political and Social Sciences of the European University Institute Examining Board Prof Sven Steinmo, EUI (Supervisor) Prof László Bruszt, EUI Prof Ana Marta Guillén Rodríguez, University of Oviedo Prof Ellen Immergut, Humboldt University Berlin © Popić, 2014 No part of this thesis may be copied, reproduced or transmitted without prior permission of the author Abstract What determines the pace of policy innovation and change? Why, in other words, do policy makers in some countries innovate faster than in others? This thesis challenges conventional explanations, according to which policy change occurs in response to class conflict, partisan preferences, power of professional groups, or institutional and policy legacies. The thesis instead argues that different paths of policy change can be best explained by the different learning processes by which policy makers develop ideas for new policies in reaction to old policies. The thesis draws upon both ideational and institutional streams of literature on policy change, and develops its argument that policy change, understood as a learning process, is a result of interactions between three different, yet interdependent factors – ideas, interests and institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Politics and Views on Brexit
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 8362, 2 May 2019 The EU27: Internal Politics By Stefano Fella, Vaughne Miller, Nigel Walker and Views on Brexit Contents: 1. Austria 2. Belgium 3. Bulgaria 4. Croatia 5. Cyprus 6. Czech Republic 7. Denmark 8. Estonia 9. Finland 10. France 11. Germany 12. Greece 13. Hungary 14. Ireland 15. Italy 16. Latvia 17. Lithuania 18. Luxembourg 19. Malta 20. Netherlands 21. Poland 22. Portugal 23. Romania 24. Slovakia 25. Slovenia 26. Spain 27. Sweden www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 The EU27: Internal Politics and Views on Brexit Contents Summary 6 1. Austria 13 1.1 Key Facts 13 1.2 Background 14 1.3 Current Government and Recent Political Developments 15 1.4 Views on Brexit 17 2. Belgium 25 2.1 Key Facts 25 2.2 Background 25 2.3 Current Government and recent political developments 26 2.4 Views on Brexit 28 3. Bulgaria 32 3.1 Key Facts 32 3.2 Background 32 3.3 Current Government and recent political developments 33 3.4 Views on Brexit 35 4. Croatia 37 4.1 Key Facts 37 4.2 Background 37 4.3 Current Government and recent political developments 38 4.4 Views on Brexit 39 5. Cyprus 42 5.1 Key Facts 42 5.2 Background 42 5.3 Current Government and recent political developments 43 5.4 Views on Brexit 45 6. Czech Republic 49 6.1 Key Facts 49 6.2 Background 49 6.3 Current Government and recent political developments 50 6.4 Views on Brexit 53 7.
    [Show full text]