DOCSLIB.ORG

Economic Assessment and Systems Analysis of an Evolvable Lunar Architecture That Leverages Commercial Space Capabilities and Public-Private-Partnerships

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Economic Assessment and Systems Analysis of an Evolvable Lunar Architecture That Leverages Commercial Space Capabilities and Public-Private-Partnerships Economic Assessment and Systems Analysis of an Evolvable Lunar Architecture that Leverages Commercial Space Capabilities and Public-Private-Partnerships Forward This study by NexGen Space LLC (NexGen) was partly funded by a grant from NASA’s Emerging Space office in the Office of the Chief Technologist. The conclusions in this report are solely those of NexGen and the study team authors. Date of Publication July 13, 2015 Study Team Charles Miller, NexGen Space LLC, Principal Investigator Alan Wilhite, Wilhite Consulting, Inc., Co-Principal Investigator Dave Cheuvront Rob Kelso Howard McCurdy, American University Edgar Zapata, NASA KSC Independent Review Team Joe Rothenberg, former NASA Associate Administrator for Spaceflight (Chairman) Gene Grush, former NASA JSC Engineering Directorate (Technical subsection lead) Jeffrey Hoffman, MIT Professor, former NASA astronaut (S&MA subsection lead) David Leestma, former NASA astronaut, (Cost Estimation subsection lead) Hoyt Davidson, Near Earth LLC, (Business Risk Management subsection lead) Alexandra Hall, Sodor Space, (Public Benefits subsection lead) Jim Ball, Spaceport Strategies LLC Frank DiBello, Space Florida Jeff Greason, XCOR Aerospace Ed Horowitz, US Space LLC Steve Isakowitz, former NASA Deputy Associate Administrator for Exploration Christopher Kraft, former Director NASA Johnson Space Center Michael Lopez-Alegria, former NASA astronaut Thomas Moser, former NASA Deputy Associate Administrator for Human Spaceflight James Muncy, Polispace Gary Payton, former NASA astronaut, former Deputy Undersecretary for Space, USAF Eric Sterner, former NASA Associate Deputy Administrator for Policy and Planning Will Trafton, former NASA Deputy Associate Administrator for Spaceflight James Vedda, Aerospace Corporation Robert Walker, former Chairman of the House Committee on Science and Technology Gordon Woodcock, consultant NexGen Space LLC Page 1 Evolvable Lunar Architecture Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 4 STUDY ASSUMPTIONS .................................................................................................. 6 1) PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS AS ACQUISITION STRATEGY ...................................... 6 2) 100% PRIVATE OWNERSHIP OF LUNAR INFRASTRUCTURE AND ASSETS ....................... 8 3) INTERNATIONAL LUNAR AUTHORITY TO REDUCE BUSINESS RISK ............................... 9 4) EVOLVABLE LUNAR ARCHITECTURE ............................................................................ 9 TECHNICAL ANALYSIS .............................................................................................. 11 GENERAL TECHNICAL APPROACH .................................................................................. 11 ANALYSIS METHODS ...................................................................................................... 12 PHASE 1A — ROBOTIC SCOUTING, PROSPECTING, SITE PREPARATION .......................... 13 PHASE 1B — HUMAN SORTIES TO LUNAR EQUATOR ..................................................... 19 PHASE 2 — HUMAN SORTIES TO POLES .......................................................................... 23 PHASE 3 — PROPELLANT DELIVERY TO L2 & PERMANENT LUNAR BASE ...................... 25 PHASE 4+ (OPTIONAL) — REUSABLE OTV BETWEEN LEO AND L2 ............................... 27 TECHNICAL RISK ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................... 28 LIFE CYCLE COST ESTIMATES ............................................................................... 30 BASIS OF ESTIMATE ........................................................................................................ 30 Ground Rules ............................................................................................................. 30 Assumptions ............................................................................................................... 31 HISTORICAL DATA .......................................................................................................... 32 MODELING & ANALYSIS - SCOPE ................................................................................... 34 Modeling & Analysis – Drivers ................................................................................. 35 Modeling & Analysis – Context, the NASA Budget ................................................... 35 LIFE CYCLE COST ASSESSMENT - RESULTS .................................................................... 37 Frequently Asked Questions ...................................................................................... 45 Life Cycle Cost Assessment – Results Summary ........................................................ 46 Life Cycle Cost Assessment – Forward Work ........................................................... 46 MANAGING INTEGRATED RISKS ........................................................................... 48 RISK STRATEGIES TO MITIGATE LOSS OF LAUNCH VEHICLE .......................................... 50 RISK STRATEGIES TO MITIGATE LOSS OF IN-SPACE ELEMENTS ..................................... 54 RISK STRATEGIES TO MITIGATE LOSS OF LUNAR LANDER OR ASCENT VEHICLES ......... 56 RISK STRATEGIES TO MITIGATE LOSS OF SURFACE ELEMENTS ...................................... 57 RISK STRATEGIES FOR MITIGATING LOSS OF CREW OR LOSS OF MISSION ...................... 58 RISK STRATEGIES FOR MITIGATING CREW HEALTH AND MEDICAL CONDITIONS ........... 59 CONCLUSIONS FOR INTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENT ................................................... 60 MITIGATING BUSINESS RISKS ................................................................................ 63 WEAKNESSES OF PPP MODEL ........................................................................................ 63 MITIGATING BUSINESS RISK WITH AN INTERNATIONAL LUNAR AUTHORITY ................. 64 GOVERNANCE CASE STUDIES ............................................................................... 67 Port Authority of NY-NJ ............................................................................................ 67 CERN ......................................................................................................................... 70 Tennessee Valley Authority ....................................................................................... 72 COMSAT-INTELSAT ................................................................................................. 74 NexGen Space LLC Page 2 Evolvable Lunar Architecture AT&T (Monopoly, Regulated Utility) ........................................................................ 77 Boeing-United Airlines Monopoly ............................................................................. 78 National Parks & Private Tourism ............................................................................ 79 McMurdo Station (Antarctica) .................................................................................. 80 Open Architectures — Increasing Private Investment & Accelerating Innovation .. 83 CASE STUDY FIGURES OF MERIT (FOMS) & SUMMARY AOA ........................................ 86 PROS OF INTERNATIONAL LUNAR AUTHORITY ............................................................... 87 CONS OF INTERNATIONAL LUNAR AUTHORITY .............................................................. 88 PUBLIC BENEFITS ....................................................................................................... 89 ECONOMIC GROWTH ...................................................................................................... 89 NATIONAL SECURITY ..................................................................................................... 89 DIPLOMATIC SOFT POWER .............................................................................................. 89 TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION .................................................................................... 90 SCIENTIFIC ADVANCES ................................................................................................... 92 STEM EDUCATION AND INSPIRATION ............................................................................ 92 SUSTAINING AND MAXIMIZING THE PUBLIC BENEFITS ................................................... 93 APPENDIX A — STUDY TEAM BIOGRAPHIES ..................................................... 94 APPENDIX B — INDEPENDENT REVIEW TEAM BIOS ...................................... 97 END NOTES .................................................................................................................. 100 NexGen Space LLC Page 3 Evolvable Lunar Architecture Executive Summary This study’s primary purpose was to assess the feasibility of new approaches for achieving our national goals in space. NexGen assembled a team of former NASA executives and engineers who assessed the economic and technical viability of an “Evolvable Lunar Architecture” (ELA) that leverages commercial capabilities and services that are existing or likely to emerge in the near-term. We evaluated an ELA concept that was designed as an incremental, low-cost and low-risk method for returning humans to the Moon in a manner that directly supports NASA’s long-term plan to send humans to Mars. The ELA strategic objective is commercial mining of propellant from lunar poles where it will be transported to lunar orbit to be used by NASA to send humans to Mars. The study assumed A) that the United States is willing to lead an international partnership
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gryphon: a Flexible Lunar Lander Design to Support a Semi-Permanent Lunar Outpost
    AIAA SPACE 2007 Conference & Exposition AIAA 2007-6169 18 - 20 September 2007, Long Beach, California The Gryphon: A Flexible Lunar Lander Design to Support a Semi-Permanent Lunar Outpost Dale Arney1, Joseph Hickman,1 Philip Tanner,1 John Wagner,1 Marc Wilson,1 and Dr. Alan Wilhite2 Georgia Institute of Technology/National Institute of Aerospace, Hampton, VA, 23666 A lunar lander is designed to provide safe, reliable, and continuous access to the lunar surface by the year 2020. The NASA Exploration System Architecture is used to initially define the concept of operations, architecture elements, and overall system requirements. The design evaluates revolutionary concepts and technologies to improve the performance and safety of the lunar lander while minimizing the associated cost using advanced systems engineering capabilities and multi-attribute decision making techniques. The final design is a flexible (crew and/or cargo) lander with a side-mounted minimum ascent stage and a separate stage to perform lunar orbit insertion. Nomenclature ACC = Affordability and Cost Criterion AFM = Autonomous Flight Manager AHP = Analytic Hierarchy Process ALHAT = Autonomous Landing and Hazard Avoidance Technology ATP = Authority to Proceed AWRS = Advanced Air & Water Recovery System CDR = Critical Design Review CER = Cost Estimating Relationship CEV = Crew Exploration Vehicle CH4 = Methane DDT&E = Design, Development, Testing and Evaluation DOI = Descent Orbit Insertion DSM = Design Structure Matrix ECLSS = Environmental Control & Life Support System
    [Show full text]
  • The Regulatory Role of the Federal Aviation Administration
    The Regulatory Role of the Federal Aviation Federal Aviation Administration Administration Presented to: Legal Subcommittee of the United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space By: Laura Montgomery, Senior Attorney, FAA Regulatory Structure • Congress • Executive Branch – Federal Aviation Administration – space transportation – Federal Communications Commissions – space communications – National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration – remote sensing from space • Judiciary Federal Aviation 2 2 Administration March 2010 Administrative Procedure Act • Rulemaking • Authorizations: licenses and permits • Adjudication Federal Aviation 3 3 Administration March 2010 Statutory Authority • 49 U.S.C. Subtitle IX, chapter 701 (Ch. 701) – Authorizes the Secretary of Transportation to authorize launch and reentry and operation of launch and reentry sites as carried out by U.S. citizens or within the United States. – Directs the Secretary to • Exercise this responsibility consistent with public health and safety, safety of property, and national security and foreign policy interests of the United States. • Encourage, facilitate and promote commercial space launches and reentries by the private sector. Federal Aviation 4 Administration March 2010 Statutory Mission ELV Air Launch Launch & Reentry Sites RLV Launch & Reentry Sea Launch Human Space Flight Federal Aviation 5 5 Administration March 2010 Types of Launch Sites Oklahoma Spaceport ELV California Spaceport Sea Launch Florida Kodiak Launch Spaceport Complex Mid-Atlantic Mojave Air
    [Show full text]
  • Project Selene: AIAA Lunar Base Camp
    Project Selene: AIAA Lunar Base Camp AIAA Space Mission System 2019-2020 Virginia Tech Aerospace Engineering Faculty Advisor : Dr. Kevin Shinpaugh Team Members : Olivia Arthur, Bobby Aselford, Michel Becker, Patrick Crandall, Heidi Engebreth, Maedini Jayaprakash, Logan Lark, Nico Ortiz, Matthew Pieczynski, Brendan Ventura Member AIAA Number Member AIAA Number And Signature And Signature Faculty Advisor 25807 Dr. Kevin Shinpaugh Brendan Ventura 1109196 Matthew Pieczynski 936900 Team Lead/Operations Logan Lark 902106 Heidi Engebreth 1109232 Structures & Environment Patrick Crandall 1109193 Olivia Arthur 999589 Power & Thermal Maedini Jayaprakash 1085663 Robert Aselford 1109195 CCDH/Operations Michel Becker 1109194 Nico Ortiz 1109533 Attitude, Trajectory, Orbits and Launch Vehicles Contents 1 Symbols and Acronyms 8 2 Executive Summary 9 3 Preface and Introduction 13 3.1 Project Management . 13 3.2 Problem Definition . 14 3.2.1 Background and Motivation . 14 3.2.2 RFP and Description . 14 3.2.3 Project Scope . 15 3.2.4 Disciplines . 15 3.2.5 Societal Sectors . 15 3.2.6 Assumptions . 16 3.2.7 Relevant Capital and Resources . 16 4 Value System Design 17 4.1 Introduction . 17 4.2 Analytical Hierarchical Process . 17 4.2.1 Longevity . 18 4.2.2 Expandability . 19 4.2.3 Scientific Return . 19 4.2.4 Risk . 20 4.2.5 Cost . 21 5 Initial Concept of Operations 21 5.1 Orbital Analysis . 22 5.2 Launch Vehicles . 22 6 Habitat Location 25 6.1 Introduction . 25 6.2 Region Selection . 25 6.3 Locations of Interest . 26 6.4 Eliminated Locations . 26 6.5 Remaining Locations . 27 6.6 Chosen Location .
    [Show full text]
  • Opposition Urges Plebiscite on Crisis PANAMA CITY, Panama (UPI) Opposition Leaders Distributed a the Opposition Proposal, Liberties, Including a Free Press
    G-ifi qf th e Pana ra Car:q usels" the Tropic Times Vol. II, No. 27 Quarry Heights, Republic of Panama Aug. 7, 1989 Opposition urges plebiscite on crisis PANAMA CITY, Panama (UPI) Opposition leaders distributed a The opposition proposal, liberties, including a free press. round of talks are the - Opposition leaders, citing a written statement proposing that a introduced during the OAS's third The latest stalemate in talks with the plebiscite be held Aug. 20 under OAS visit to Panama last month, calls for first since a July 16-17 session that government on Panama's 3-month- auspices to allow voters to choose a transfer of power to the opposition brought together the principal old political crisis, called Friday for a between proposals put forth by the on Sept. 1, the ouster of Noriega by leaders of the various factions for the national referendum to let voters government and opposition for Au2. 23 and the restoration of civil first time. decide how to resolve the dispute. ending the crisis. As the negotiations entered a At the conclusion of Friday's talks, second day, the government negotiations were suspended until announced it had closed public and Thursday at the request of the private schools in three major cities opposition. in the aftermath of the fatal shooting "There is still plenty of time and I Thursday of a 24-year-old student also think it's a good idea when these ddring an anti-government protest at discussions come to a dead end and the University of Panama.
    [Show full text]
  • A Practical Guide Second Edition
    TOURISTS in SPACE A Practical Guide Second Edition Erik Seedhouse Tourists in Space A Practical Guide Other Springer-Praxis books of related interest by Erik Seedhouse Tourists in Space: A Practical Guide 2008 ISBN: 978-0-387-74643-2 Lunar Outpost: The Challenges of Establishing a Human Settlement on the Moon 2008 ISBN: 978-0-387-09746-6 Martian Outpost: The Challenges of Establishing a Human Settlement on Mars 2009 ISBN: 978-0-387-98190-1 The New Space Race: China vs. the United States 2009 ISBN: 978-1-4419-0879-7 Prepare for Launch: The Astronaut Training Process 2010 ISBN: 978-1-4419-1349-4 Ocean Outpost: The Future of Humans Living Underwater 2010 ISBN: 978-1-4419-6356-7 Trailblazing Medicine: Sustaining Explorers During Interplanetary Missions 2011 ISBN: 978-1-4419-7828-8 Interplanetary Outpost: The Human and Technological Challenges of Exploring the Outer Planets 2012 ISBN: 978-1-4419-9747-0 Astronauts for Hire: The Emergence of a Commercial Astronaut Corps 2012 ISBN: 978-1-4614-0519-1 Pulling G: Human Responses to High and Low Gravity 2013 ISBN: 978-1-4614-3029-2 SpaceX: Making Commercial Spacefl ight a Reality 2013 ISBN: 978-1-4614-5513-4 Suborbital: Industry at the Edge of Space 2014 ISBN: 978-3-319-03484-3 Erik Seedhouse Tourists in Space A Practical Guide Second Edition Dr. Erik Seedhouse, Ph.D., FBIS Sandefjord Norway SPRINGER-PRAXIS BOOKS IN SPACE EXPLORATION ISBN 978-3-319-05037-9 ISBN 978-3-319-05038-6 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-05038-6 Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2014937810 1st edition: © Praxis Publishing Ltd, Chichester, UK, 2008 © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 This work is subject to copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA's Strategic Direction and the Need for a National Consensus
    NASA's Strategic Direction and the Need for a National Consensus NASAs Strategic Direction and the Need for a National Consensus Committee on NASAs Strategic Direction Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS Washington, D.C. www.nap.edu PREPUBLICATION COPYSUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITORIAL CORRECTION Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. NASA's Strategic Direction and the Need for a National Consensus THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. This study is based on work supported by Contract NNH10CC48B between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the agency that provided support for the project. International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-XXXXX-X International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-XXXXX-X Copies of this report are available free of charge from: Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences National Research Council 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 Additional copies of this report are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; http://www.nap.edu.
    [Show full text]
  • Options and Issues for Nasa's Human Space Flight Program
    OPTIONS AND ISSUES FOR NASA’S HUMAN SPACE FLIGHT PROGRAM: REPORT OF THE ‘‘REVIEW OF U.S. HUMAN SPACE FLIGHT PLANS’’ COMMITTEE HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION SEPTEMBER 15, 2009 Serial No. 111–51 Printed for the use of the Committee on Science and Technology ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.science.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 51–928PDF WASHINGTON : 2010 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY HON. BART GORDON, Tennessee, Chair JERRY F. COSTELLO, Illinois RALPH M. HALL, Texas EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER JR., LYNN C. WOOLSEY, California Wisconsin DAVID WU, Oregon LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas BRIAN BAIRD, Washington DANA ROHRABACHER, California BRAD MILLER, North Carolina ROSCOE G. BARTLETT, Maryland DANIEL LIPINSKI, Illinois VERNON J. EHLERS, Michigan GABRIELLE GIFFORDS, Arizona FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma DONNA F. EDWARDS, Maryland JUDY BIGGERT, Illinois MARCIA L. FUDGE, Ohio W. TODD AKIN, Missouri BEN R. LUJA´ N, New Mexico RANDY NEUGEBAUER, Texas PAUL D. TONKO, New York BOB INGLIS, South Carolina PARKER GRIFFITH, Alabama MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas STEVEN R. ROTHMAN, New Jersey MARIO DIAZ-BALART, Florida JIM MATHESON, Utah BRIAN P. BILBRAY, California LINCOLN DAVIS, Tennessee ADRIAN SMITH, Nebraska BEN CHANDLER, Kentucky PAUL C. BROUN, Georgia RUSS CARNAHAN, Missouri PETE OLSON, Texas BARON P. HILL, Indiana HARRY E.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Orbital Transportation Services
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Commercial Orbital Transportation Services A New Era in Spaceflight NASA/SP-2014-617 Commercial Orbital Transportation Services A New Era in Spaceflight On the cover: Background photo: The terminator—the line separating the sunlit side of Earth from the side in darkness—marks the changeover between day and night on the ground. By establishing government-industry partnerships, the Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) program marked a change from the traditional way NASA had worked. Inset photos, right: The COTS program supported two U.S. companies in their efforts to design and build transportation systems to carry cargo to low-Earth orbit. (Top photo—Credit: SpaceX) SpaceX launched its Falcon 9 rocket on May 22, 2012, from Cape Canaveral, Florida. (Second photo) Three days later, the company successfully completed the mission that sent its Dragon spacecraft to the Station. (Third photo—Credit: NASA/Bill Ingalls) Orbital Sciences Corp. sent its Antares rocket on its test flight on April 21, 2013, from a new launchpad on Virginia’s eastern shore. Later that year, the second Antares lifted off with Orbital’s cargo capsule, (Fourth photo) the Cygnus, that berthed with the ISS on September 29, 2013. Both companies successfully proved the capability to deliver cargo to the International Space Station by U.S. commercial companies and began a new era of spaceflight. ISS photo, center left: Benefiting from the success of the partnerships is the International Space Station, pictured as seen by the last Space Shuttle crew that visited the orbiting laboratory (July 19, 2011). More photos of the ISS are featured on the first pages of each chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Launch Vehicles a 2015 State of the Industry Survey Carlos Niederstrasser
    Small Launch Vehicles A 2015 State of the Industry Survey Carlos Niederstrasser An update to this survey will be presented at the 2016 Internaonal Astronau9cal Congress 1 Agenda Overview of Small Launch Vehicles Launch Method/Locations Launch Performance Projected Launch Costs Individual Rocket Details Copyright © 2015 by Orbital ATK, Inc. 2 Listing Criteria Have a maximum capability to LEO of 1000 kg (definition of LEO left to the LV provider). The effort must be for the development of an entire launch vehicle system (with the exception of carrier aircraft for air launch vehicles). Mentioned through a web site update, social media, traditional media, conference paper, press release, etc. sometime after 2010. Have a stated goal of completing a fully operational space launch (orbital) vehicle. Funded concept or feasibility studies by government agencies, patents for new launch methods, etc., do not qualify. Expect to be widely available commercially or to the U.S. Government No specific indication that the effort has been cancelled, closed, or otherwise disbanded. Correc&ons, addi&ons, and comments are welcomed and encouraged! Copyright © 2015 by Orbital ATK, Inc. 3 We did not … … Talk to the individual companies … Rely on any proprietary/confidential information … Verify accuracy of data found in public resources Ø Primarily relied on companies’ web sites Funding sources, when listed, are not implied to be the vehicles sole or even majority funding source. We do not make any value judgements on technical or financial credibility
    [Show full text]
  • (NTPS): a Key Space Asset for Human Exploration and Commercial Missions to the Moon
    NASA/TM—2014-218105 AIAA–2013–5465 The Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Stage (NTPS): A Key Space Asset for Human Exploration and Commercial Missions to the Moon Stanley K. Borowski Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio David R. McCurdy Vantage Partners, LLC, Brook Park, Ohio Laura M. Burke Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio October 2014 NASA STI Program . in Profi le Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to the • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected advancement of aeronautics and space science. The papers from scientifi c and technical NASA Scientifi c and Technical Information (STI) conferences, symposia, seminars, or other program plays a key part in helping NASA maintain meetings sponsored or cosponsored by NASA. this important role. • SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientifi c, The NASA STI Program operates under the auspices technical, or historical information from of the Agency Chief Information Offi cer. It collects, NASA programs, projects, and missions, often organizes, provides for archiving, and disseminates concerned with subjects having substantial NASA’s STI. The NASA STI program provides access public interest. to the NASA Aeronautics and Space Database and its public interface, the NASA Technical Reports • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. English- Server, thus providing one of the largest collections language translations of foreign scientifi c and of aeronautical and space science STI in the world. technical material pertinent to NASA’s mission. Results are published in both non-NASA channels and by NASA in the NASA STI Report Series, which Specialized services also include creating custom includes the following report types: thesauri, building customized databases, organizing and publishing research results. • TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of completed research or a major signifi cant phase For more information about the NASA STI of research that present the results of NASA program, see the following: programs and include extensive data or theoretical analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Sts-45 Press Kit March 1992
    NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION SPACE SHUTTLE MISSION STS-45 PRESS KIT MARCH 1992 ATLAS-1 MISSION Edited by Richard W. Orloff, 01/2000/Page 1 STS-45 INSIGNIA STS045-S-001 -- Designed by the crewmembers, the STS-45 insignia depicts the space shuttle launching from the Kennedy Space Center into a high inclination orbit. From this vantage point, the Atmospheric Laboratory for Applications and Science (ATLAS) payload can view the Earth, the sun, and their dynamic interactions against the background of space. Earth is prominently displayed and is the focus of the mission's space plasma physics and Earth sciences observations. The colors of the setting sun, measured by sensitive instruments, provide detailed information about ozone, carbon dioxide, and other gases which determined Earth's climate and environment. Encircling the scene are the names of the flight crew members. The additional star in the ring is to recognize Charles R. Chappell and Michael Lampton, alternate payload specialists, and the entire ATLAS-1 team for its dedication and support of this "Mission to Planet Earth." The NASA insignia design for space shuttle flights is reserved for use by the astronauts and for other official use as the NASA Administrator may authorize. Public availability has been approved only in the form of illustrations by the various news media. When and if there is any change in this policy, which we do not anticipate, it will be publicly announced. PHOTO CREDIT: NASA or National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Edited by Richard
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing Suborbital Science Through Better Understanding of Wind Effects
    Space Traffic Management Conference 2019 Progress through Collaboration Feb 26th, 11:00 AM Enhancing suborbital science through better understanding of wind effects Pedro Llanos Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach, [email protected] Diane Howard University of Texas at Austin Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/stm Part of the Aviation and Space Education Commons, Educational Technology Commons, Operational Research Commons, and the Space Vehicles Commons Llanos, Pedro and Howard, Diane, "Enhancing suborbital science through better understanding of wind effects" (2019). Space Traffic Management Conference. 25. https://commons.erau.edu/stm/2019/presentations/25 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Space Traffic Management Conference by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Enhancing suborbital science through better understanding of wind effects Pedro Llanos,1 and Diane Howard2 Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, Florida, 32114, USA This paper highlights the importance of understanding some key factors, such as winds effects, trajectory and vehicle parameters variations in order to streamline the space vehicle operations and enhance science in the upper mesosphere at about 85 km. Understanding these effects is crucial to refine current space operations and establish more robust procedures. These procedures will involve training new space operators to conduct and coordinate space operations in class E above FL600 airspace within the Air Traffic Organization (ATO). Space vehicles such as Space Ship Two can spend up to 6 minutes in class E airspace above FL600 after launch.
    [Show full text]