DOCSLIB.ORG

A Review of Nasa's Exploration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Review of Nasa's Exploration A REVIEW OF NASA’S EXPLORATION PROGRAM IN TRANSITION: ISSUES FOR CONGRESS AND INDUSTRY HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON SPACE AND AERONAUTICS COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 30, 2011 Serial No. 112–8 Printed for the use of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://science.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 65–305PDF WASHINGTON : 2011 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY HON. RALPH M. HALL, Texas, Chair F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas Wisconsin JERRY F. COSTELLO, Illinois LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas LYNN C. WOOLSEY, California DANA ROHRABACHER, California ZOE LOFGREN, California ROSCOE G. BARTLETT, Maryland DAVID WU, Oregon FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma BRAD MILLER, North Carolina JUDY BIGGERT, Illinois DANIEL LIPINSKI, Illinois W. TODD AKIN, Missouri GABRIELLE GIFFORDS, Arizona RANDY NEUGEBAUER, Texas DONNA F. EDWARDS, Maryland MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas MARCIA L. FUDGE, Ohio PAUL C. BROUN, Georgia BEN R. LUJA´ N, New Mexico SANDY ADAMS, Florida PAUL D. TONKO, New York BENJAMIN QUAYLE, Arizona JERRY MCNERNEY, California CHARLES J. ‘‘CHUCK’’ FLEISCHMANN, JOHN P. SARBANES, Maryland Tennessee TERRI A. SEWELL, Alabama E. SCOTT RIGELL, Virginia FREDERICA S. WILSON, Florida STEVEN M. PALAZZO, Mississippi HANSEN CLARKE, Michigan MO BROOKS, Alabama ANDY HARRIS, Maryland RANDY HULTGREN, Illinois CHIP CRAVAACK, Minnesota LARRY BUCSHON, Indiana DAN BENISHEK, Michigan VACANCY SUBCOMMITTEE ON SPACE AND AERONAUTICS HON. STEVEN M. PALAZZO, Mississippi, Chair F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER JR., GABRIELLE GIFFORDS, Arizona Wisconsin MARCIA L. FUDGE, Ohio LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas JERRY F. COSTELLO, Illinois DANA ROHRABACHER, California TERRI A. SEWELL, Alabama FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma DAVID WU, Oregon W. TODD AKIN, Missouri DONNA F. EDWARDS, Maryland MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas FREDERICA S. WILSON, Florida SANDY ADAMS, Florida E. SCOTT RIGELL, Virginia MO BROOKS, Alabama RALPH M. HALL, Texas EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas (II) C O N T E N T S Date of Hearing Page Witness List ............................................................................................................. 2 Hearing Charter ...................................................................................................... 3 Opening Statements Statement by Representative Steven M. Palazzo, Chair, Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives .................................................................................... 13 Written Statement ............................................................................................ 14 Statement by Representative Ralph M. Hall, Chairman, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives ..................... 14 Written Statement ............................................................................................ 16 Statement by Representative Jerry F. Costello, Acting Ranking Minority Member, Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives .................................... 17 Written Statement ............................................................................................ 18 Witnesses: Mr. Douglas Cooke, Associate Administrator, Exploration Systems Mission Directorate, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Oral Statement ................................................................................................. 19 Written Statement ............................................................................................ 21 Dr. Scott Pace, Director, Space Policy Institute, George Washington Univer- sity Oral Statement ................................................................................................. 34 Written Statement ............................................................................................ 36 Mr. James Maser, Chairman, Corporate Membership Committee, The Amer- ican Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Oral Statement ................................................................................................. 43 Written Statement ............................................................................................ 45 Discussion Appendix: Answers to Post-Hearing Questions Mr. Douglas Cooke, Associate Administrator, Exploration Systems Mission Directorate, National Aeronautics and Space Administration ......................... 68 Dr. Scott Pace, Director, Space Policy Institute, George Washington Univer- sity ......................................................................................................................... 81 Mr. James Maser, Chairman, Corporate Membership Committee, The Amer- ican Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics ................................................. 85 (III) A REVIEW OF NASA’S EXPLORATION PRO- GRAM IN TRANSITION: ISSUES FOR CON- GRESS AND INDUSTRY WEDNESDAY, MARCH 30, 2011 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SUBCOMMITTEE ON SPACE AND AERONAUTICS, COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY, Washington, DC. The Subcommittee met, pursuant to call, at 10:00 a.m., in Room 2318 of the Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Steven Palazzo [Chairman of the Subcommittee] presiding. (1) 2 3 HEARING CHARTER COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY SUBCOMMITTEE ON SPACE AND AERONAUTICS U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES A Review of NASA’s Exploration Program in Transition: Issues for Congress and Industry WEDNESDAY, MARCH 30, 2011 10:00 A.M.–12:00 P.M. 2318 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING Purpose The subcommittee will examine 1) the accomplishments of the Constellation pro- gram, 2) NASA’s transition toward development of the Space Launch System (SLS) and Multi Purpose Crew Vehicle (MPCV), and compliance with the FY2011 con- tinuing resolution and the NASA Authorization Act, 3) the status of the 90-day SLS/ MPCV report to Congress, and 4) examine the key challenges and risks in imple- menting the proposed changes including outstanding questions and issues for Con- gress from delays or other disruptions to the workforce or aerospace industrial base. Witnesses • Mr. Douglas Cooke, Associate Administrator, Exploration Systems Mission Directorate, National Aeronautics and Space Administration • Dr. Scott Pace, Director, Space Policy Institute, George Washington Univer- sity • Mr. James Maser, Chairman, Corporate Membership Committee, The Amer- ican Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. 4 Issues Exploration Capabilities in Transition; Issues for Congress and Industry At issue is NASA’s compliance with Congressional direction on extending and modifying the Constellation contracts, and the implications of NASA’s actions for the continued, uninterrupted progress on the Multi Purpose Crew Vehicle (MPCV) and Space Launch System (SLS). Congressional intent, as reflected in authorization and appropriation language seek to utilize the existing workforce and assets in order to limit the damage to the nation’s industrial base and workforce. As the budget comparison above indicates, the FY2012 budget request does not adhere to the funding guidance in last year’s authorization bill (PL 111-267). The administration’s FY2012 budget request for Exploration systems is $1.24 billion below the amount specified in the Act. Exploration systems is $2.5 billion below when comparing both FY2012 and FY2013. In FY2013, the administration does not identify the funding specified for the two main components; the MPCV and the SLS. In spite of the $2.5 billion reduction over two years in proposed funding for Explo- ration Capabilities, Administrator Bolden said, ‘‘I am committed to try to make sure that the funding levels remain about the same, and one of the things is beginning in 2013 I have asked and I have been granted that we put human exploration in one budget line so that we can move the funds around as necessary in each successive year so that we marry those programs up when we need them, you know, that being the 2020 timeframe . ’’ Yet, section 302 of the NASA Authorization Act directs the agency to develop the heavy lift system in a way that permits early flight testing of the ‘‘core’’ stage ele- ments with a goal of an operational capability to orbit by December 31, 2016. The U.S. space industrial base that has supported the Constellation - now MPCV and SLS effort - has waited while the agency settles on a plan for human spaceflight, and unless the uncertainty is eliminated in the near future, there could be serious disruptions to the aerospace workforce and industrial base as key sup- pliers begin to exit the market. Report due to Congress The Authorization Act directed NASA to report back in 90 days on the design of the vehicle envisioned, and to provide the assumptions and cost analysis to justify the systems selected. On January 10th NASA provided a preliminary report con- taining no detailed cost or schedule assessments, yet concluding nevertheless that, ‘‘to date our studies have shown that none of those options thus far appear to be af- fordable in our present fiscal conditions, based upon existing cost models, historical data, and traditional acquisition approaches.’’ According to NASA
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ares I Upper Stage Powering the Second Phase of a Rocket’S Journey to Space
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA’s Ares I Upper Stage Powering the Second Phase of a Rocket’s Journey to Space Going to the moon and beyond will be a stunning Shortly after J-2X engine cutoff, the Orion cap- achievement and an enduring legacy to future sule will separate from the upper stage. Orion’s generations. Supporting the agency’s mission engine then will ignite to insert the capsule into to explore, learn and progress is NASA’s Ares I low-Earth orbit. The Ares I upper stage – dor- crew launch vehicle, an in-line, two-stage rocket. mant after safe shut-down of the J-2X upper The flagship of the Constellation Program’s space stage engine – will re-enter Earth’s atmosphere facts transportation system, the Ares I will carry the and splash down in the Indian Ocean. The upper Orion spacecraft and its crew on missions to the stage and J-2X engine will not be reused. International Space Station and then later on to the moon and beyond. Upper Stage Components The entire Ares I vehicle will be 325 feet tall, with Taking the Ares I on the second phase of its jour- a liftoff mass of 2.0 million pounds and payload ney from Earth will be the spacecraft’s second, capacity of 56,200 pounds mass to low Earth or upper, stage, powered by the J-2X engine. orbit for International Space Station missions, Approximately 133 seconds after liftoff, the Ares and 55,600 pounds mass for lunar missions. I upper stage will separate from the vehicle’s first A self-supporting cylindrical structure, the Ares stage, and the J-2X will ignite.
    [Show full text]
  • Gryphon: a Flexible Lunar Lander Design to Support a Semi-Permanent Lunar Outpost
    AIAA SPACE 2007 Conference & Exposition AIAA 2007-6169 18 - 20 September 2007, Long Beach, California The Gryphon: A Flexible Lunar Lander Design to Support a Semi-Permanent Lunar Outpost Dale Arney1, Joseph Hickman,1 Philip Tanner,1 John Wagner,1 Marc Wilson,1 and Dr. Alan Wilhite2 Georgia Institute of Technology/National Institute of Aerospace, Hampton, VA, 23666 A lunar lander is designed to provide safe, reliable, and continuous access to the lunar surface by the year 2020. The NASA Exploration System Architecture is used to initially define the concept of operations, architecture elements, and overall system requirements. The design evaluates revolutionary concepts and technologies to improve the performance and safety of the lunar lander while minimizing the associated cost using advanced systems engineering capabilities and multi-attribute decision making techniques. The final design is a flexible (crew and/or cargo) lander with a side-mounted minimum ascent stage and a separate stage to perform lunar orbit insertion. Nomenclature ACC = Affordability and Cost Criterion AFM = Autonomous Flight Manager AHP = Analytic Hierarchy Process ALHAT = Autonomous Landing and Hazard Avoidance Technology ATP = Authority to Proceed AWRS = Advanced Air & Water Recovery System CDR = Critical Design Review CER = Cost Estimating Relationship CEV = Crew Exploration Vehicle CH4 = Methane DDT&E = Design, Development, Testing and Evaluation DOI = Descent Orbit Insertion DSM = Design Structure Matrix ECLSS = Environmental Control & Life Support System
    [Show full text]
  • Human Issues Related to Spacecraft Vibration During Ascent
    Human Issues related to Spacecraft Vibration during Ascent Consultant Report to the Constellation Program Standing Review Board Jonathan B. Clark M.D., M.P.H. Suite NA 425 One Baylor Plaza Baylor College of Medicine Houston TX 77030-3498 1731 Sunset Blvd Houston TX 77005 713 859 1381 281 989 8721 [email protected] [email protected] Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not reflect the views of the National Space Biomedical Research Institute (NSBRI), Baylor College of Medicine (BCM), the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), or the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Human Issues related to Spacecraft Vibration during Ascent Consultant Report to the Constellation Program Standing Review Board Jonathan B. Clark M.D., M.P.H. Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not reflect the views of the National Space Biomedical Research Institute (NSBRI), Baylor College of Medicine (BCM), the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), or the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Pogo in Liquid Fueled Rocket Motors The pogo phenomenon, or fuel pump inlet pressure fluctuation/ cavitation due to tuning feed line resonant frequencies was a major concern in the early space program. Pump tests showed that as inlet pressures were reduced toward cavitation, the pump started acting as an amplifier, causing large oscillations in the thrust chamber pressure. As the rocket engine thrust develops, liquid propellant is cyclically forced into the turbopump. This fluctuating fluid pressure is converted into an unintended and variable increase in engine thrust, with the net effect being longitudinal axis vibration that could result in spacecraft structural failure.
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION to U.S. Export Controls for the Commercial Space Industry
    INTRODUCTION TO U.S. Export Controls for the Commercial Space Industry 2nd Edition – November 2017 Department of Federal Aviation Commerce Administration This publication was prepared by the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Office of Space Commerce and the Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation. For additional information, questions, or comments, please visit our websites: www.space.commerce.gov ast.faa.gov IMAGE CREDITS Cover: Spaceflight Industries, Inc. Page 2: Blue Origin Page 12: NASA/Orbital ATK Page 32: Mobilus In Mobili Page 50: Planet Page 58: SSL Page 62: Spire Table of Contents PURPOSE ......................................................................1 SECTION 1: BACKGROUND ...................................................2 1.1 Export Control 101 ........................................................4 1.1.1 Definitions: Exports, Deemed Exports, and Re-exports .................4 1.1.2 The Reasons for Controls ................................................4 1.1.3 Regulations and Responsible Departments .............................5 1.1.4 Multilateral Commitments ..............................................7 1.2 What’s Changed Under Export Control Reform .........................8 1.2.1 Satellite Export Control Reform .........................................8 1.2.2 Major Process Changes under Export Control Reform ..................9 SECTION 2: UNDERSTANDING THE CONTROL LISTS AND HOW THEY WORK ......................................................12 2.1 Overview .................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-07-595T NASA: Issues Surrounding the Transition from The
    United States Government Accountability Office Testimony before the Subcommittee on GAO Space, Aeronautics, and Related Sciences, Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, U.S. Senate For Release on Delivery Expected at 2:30 p.m. EDT Wednesday, March 28, 2007 NASA Issues Surrounding the Transition from the Space Shuttle to the Next Generation of Human Space Flight Systems Statement of Allen Li, Director Acquisition and Sourcing Management GAO-07-595T March 28, 2007 NASA Accountability Integrity Reliability Highlights Issues Surrounding the Transition from Highlights of GAO-07-595T, a testimony the Space Shuttle to the Next Generation before the Subcommittee on Space, Aeronautics, and Related Sciences, of Human Space Flight Systems Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, U. S. Senate Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found On January 14, 2004, the President NASA is in the midst of a transition effort of a magnitude not seen since the announced a new Vision for space end of the Apollo program and the start of the Space Shuttle Program more exploration that directs the than 3 decades ago. This transition will include a massive transfer of people, National Aeronautics and Space hardware, and infrastructure. Based on ongoing and work completed to- Administration (NASA) to focus its date, we have identified a number of issues that pose unique challenges to efforts on returning humans to the moon by 2020 in preparation for NASA as it transitions from the shuttle to the next generation of human future, more ambitions missions. space flight systems while at the same time seeking to minimize the time the United States will be without its own means to put humans in space.
    [Show full text]
  • Ares I Can Model by Clicking on Ares Education Program Under Contacts on the Right of the Screen
    VISIT US ON THE WEB National Aeronautics and Space Administration Be sure to ask for parental assistance before get- ting online at <www.nasa.gov/ares>. Click the Ares Education link, on the left of the screen for additional information: • Print a Full-Page Color Poster and Paper Funnel Template. • View Detailed Ramp Assembly Instructions. • Send us an e-mail with comments and pictures of your Ares I Can Model by clicking on Ares Education Program under Contacts on the right of the screen. ARES I CAN MODEL National Aeronautics and Space Administration George C. Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL 35812 www.nasa.gov/marshall A hands-on project to help learn about and interact with NASA’s Ares I Rocket. www.nasa.gov NP-2009-06-118-MSFC 8-426227 OVERVIEW NASA plans to take humans back to the Moon, and the Ares I Crew Launch Vehicle (CLV) will help them 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 get there. The Ares I rocket is made of several parts: The recipe shows how to make these can groups. 1. Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV) 2. Instrument Unit (IU)* RECIPE DISPLAY RAMP 3. Core Stage (CS)* 1. Tape a funnel to the top of an upside down can The Human Factors Engineering Team built a ramp 4. Upper Stage Engine (USE) located within the of peppers (The peppers symbolize the propulsion to proudly display the Ares I Can Model. It is a Interstage (IS)* engine “hot zone” of the Orion Crew Exploration V-shaped ramp made of medium-density fiberboard 5.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role and Training of NASA Astronauts In
    Co-chairs: Joe Rothenberg, Fred Gregory Briefing: October 18-19, 2011 Statement of Task An ad hoc committee will conduct a study and prepare a report on the activities of NASA’s human spaceflight crew office. In writing its report the committee will address the following questions: • How should the role and size of the activities managed by the Johnson Space Center Flight Crew Operations Directorate change after space shuttle retirement and completion of the assembly of the International Space Station (ISS)? • What are the requirements of crew-related ground-based facilities after the space shuttle program ends? • Is the fleet of aircraft used for the training the Astronaut Corps a cost-effective means of preparing astronauts to meet the requirements of NASA’s human spaceflight program? Are there more cost-effective means of meeting these training requirements? The NRC was not asked to consider whether or not the United States should continue human spaceflight, or whether there were better alternatives to achieving the nation’s goals without launching humans into space. Rather, the NRC’s charge was to assume that U.S. human spaceflight would continue. 2 Committee on Human Spaceflight Crew Operations • FREDERICK GREGORY, Lohfeld Consulting Group, Inc., Co-Chair • JOSEPH H. ROTHENBERG, Swedish Space Corporation, Co-Chair • MICHAEL J. CASSUTT, University of Southern California • RICHARD O. COVEY, United Space Alliance, LLC (retired) • DUANE DEAL, Stinger Ghaffarian Technologies, Inc. • BONNIE J. DUNBAR, President and CEO, Dunbar International, LLC • WILLIAM W. HOOVER, Independent Consultant • THOMAS D. JONES, Florida Institute of Human and Machine Cognition • FRANKLIN D. MARTIN, Martin Consulting, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Space Station and the Space Shuttle
    Order Code RL33568 The International Space Station and the Space Shuttle Updated November 9, 2007 Carl E. Behrens Specialist in Energy Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division The International Space Station and the Space Shuttle Summary The International Space Station (ISS) program began in 1993, with Russia joining the United States, Europe, Japan, and Canada. Crews have occupied ISS on a 4-6 month rotating basis since November 2000. The U.S. Space Shuttle, which first flew in April 1981, has been the major vehicle taking crews and cargo back and forth to ISS, but the shuttle system has encountered difficulties since the Columbia disaster in 2003. Russian Soyuz spacecraft are also used to take crews to and from ISS, and Russian Progress spacecraft deliver cargo, but cannot return anything to Earth, since they are not designed to survive reentry into the Earth’s atmosphere. A Soyuz is always attached to the station as a lifeboat in case of an emergency. President Bush, prompted in part by the Columbia tragedy, made a major space policy address on January 14, 2004, directing NASA to focus its activities on returning humans to the Moon and someday sending them to Mars. Included in this “Vision for Space Exploration” is a plan to retire the space shuttle in 2010. The President said the United States would fulfill its commitments to its space station partners, but the details of how to accomplish that without the shuttle were not announced. The shuttle Discovery was launched on July 4, 2006, and returned safely to Earth on July 17.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights in Space 2010
    International Astronautical Federation Committee on Space Research International Institute of Space Law 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren c/o CNES 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren UNITED NATIONS 75015 Paris, France 2 place Maurice Quentin 75015 Paris, France Tel: +33 1 45 67 42 60 Fax: +33 1 42 73 21 20 Tel. + 33 1 44 76 75 10 E-mail: : [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Fax. + 33 1 44 76 74 37 URL: www.iislweb.com OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS URL: www.iafastro.com E-mail: [email protected] URL : http://cosparhq.cnes.fr Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law The United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs is responsible for promoting international cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space and assisting developing countries in using space science and technology. United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs P. O. Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: (+43-1) 26060-4950 Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5830 E-mail: [email protected] URL: www.unoosa.org United Nations publication Printed in Austria USD 15 Sales No. E.11.I.3 ISBN 978-92-1-101236-1 ST/SPACE/57 *1180239* V.11-80239—January 2011—775 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS UNITED NATIONS OFFICE AT VIENNA Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law Progress in space science, technology and applications, international cooperation and space law UNITED NATIONS New York, 2011 UniTEd NationS PUblication Sales no.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA's Strategic Direction and the Need for a National Consensus
    NASA's Strategic Direction and the Need for a National Consensus NASAs Strategic Direction and the Need for a National Consensus Committee on NASAs Strategic Direction Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS Washington, D.C. www.nap.edu PREPUBLICATION COPYSUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITORIAL CORRECTION Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. NASA's Strategic Direction and the Need for a National Consensus THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. This study is based on work supported by Contract NNH10CC48B between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the agency that provided support for the project. International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-XXXXX-X International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-XXXXX-X Copies of this report are available free of charge from: Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences National Research Council 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 Additional copies of this report are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; http://www.nap.edu.
    [Show full text]
  • Options and Issues for Nasa's Human Space Flight Program
    OPTIONS AND ISSUES FOR NASA’S HUMAN SPACE FLIGHT PROGRAM: REPORT OF THE ‘‘REVIEW OF U.S. HUMAN SPACE FLIGHT PLANS’’ COMMITTEE HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION SEPTEMBER 15, 2009 Serial No. 111–51 Printed for the use of the Committee on Science and Technology ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.science.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 51–928PDF WASHINGTON : 2010 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY HON. BART GORDON, Tennessee, Chair JERRY F. COSTELLO, Illinois RALPH M. HALL, Texas EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER JR., LYNN C. WOOLSEY, California Wisconsin DAVID WU, Oregon LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas BRIAN BAIRD, Washington DANA ROHRABACHER, California BRAD MILLER, North Carolina ROSCOE G. BARTLETT, Maryland DANIEL LIPINSKI, Illinois VERNON J. EHLERS, Michigan GABRIELLE GIFFORDS, Arizona FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma DONNA F. EDWARDS, Maryland JUDY BIGGERT, Illinois MARCIA L. FUDGE, Ohio W. TODD AKIN, Missouri BEN R. LUJA´ N, New Mexico RANDY NEUGEBAUER, Texas PAUL D. TONKO, New York BOB INGLIS, South Carolina PARKER GRIFFITH, Alabama MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas STEVEN R. ROTHMAN, New Jersey MARIO DIAZ-BALART, Florida JIM MATHESON, Utah BRIAN P. BILBRAY, California LINCOLN DAVIS, Tennessee ADRIAN SMITH, Nebraska BEN CHANDLER, Kentucky PAUL C. BROUN, Georgia RUSS CARNAHAN, Missouri PETE OLSON, Texas BARON P. HILL, Indiana HARRY E.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Vision for Space Exploration
    Constellation The New Vision for Space Exploration Dale Thomas NASA Constellation Program October 2008 The Constellation Program was born from the Constellation’sNASA Authorization Beginnings Act of 2005 which stated…. The Administrator shall establish a program to develop a sustained human presence on the moon, including a robust precursor program to promote exploration, science, commerce and U.S. preeminence in space, and as a stepping stone to future exploration of Mars and other destinations. CONSTELLATION PROJECTS Initial Capability Lunar Capability Orion Altair Ares I Ares V Mission Operations EVA Ground Operations Lunar Surface EVA EXPLORATION ROADMAP 0506 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 LunarLunar OutpostOutpost BuildupBuildup ExplorationExploration andand ScienceScience LunarLunar RoboticsRobotics MissionsMissions CommercialCommercial OrbitalOrbital Transportation ServicesServices forfor ISSISS AresAres II andand OrionOrion DevelopmentDevelopment AltairAltair Lunar LanderLander Development AresAres VV and EarthEarth DepartureDeparture Stage SurfaceSurface SystemsSystems DevelopmentDevelopment ORION: NEXT GENERATION PILOTED SPACECRAFT Human access to Low Earth Orbit … … to the Moon and Mars ORION PROJECT: CREW EXPLORATION VEHICLE Orion will support both space station and moon missions Launch Abort System Orion will support both space stationDesigned and moonto operate missions for up to 210 days in Earth or lunar Designedorbit to operate for up to 210 days in Earth or lunar orbit Designed for lunar
    [Show full text]