DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Scoping Report 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Scoping Report 2020 Official Revised SA Scoping Report of Local Plan February 2020 London Borough of Richmond upon Thames Local Plan Draft REVISED Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report for the Local Plan For consultation February 2020 1 Official Revised SA Scoping Report of Local Plan February 2020 Non-Technical Summary 1. Introduction This document forms the Scoping Report for a Sustainability Appraisal (SA), incorporating the requirements for a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA), of the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames Local Plan. The primary purpose of the Sustainability Appraisal (SA) is to promote sustainable development through the better integration of sustainability considerations in the process of preparing and adopting plans. SA is an iterative process allowing us to identify and report on the likely significant effects of the plan, and the extent to which the implementation of the plan will achieve the social, environmental and economic objectives by which sustainable development can be defined. This is a draft Revised Scoping Report, based on the version produced in May 2016 for the adopted Local Plan (2018). Changes will be made to the draft document following consultation in Spring 2020 with the three statutory consultees with environmental responsibilities in England, along with other relevant stakeholders with a sustainability remit or a local interest. 1.1 The Purpose of the SA/SEA The purpose of the SA (incorporating SEA) is to ensure that environmental, social and economic considerations have been integrated into the preparation of the Local Plan. The SA will: • Ensure compliance with the SEA Directive, SEA Regulations and guidance on SEA/SA; • Review the Local Plan’s relationship with other plans operating at a national, regional and more local level with regard to their policies and programmes; • Establish the baseline environmental, social and economic characteristics of the area; • Identify any current environmental constraints, issues and problems; • Help develop viable options and alternatives; and • Review the sustainability impacts of the options, and of any preferred SPD option. 1.2 The Local Plan In Richmond upon Thames, Local Plans are managed through a portfolio of documents, which are individually known as Local Development Documents. These Local Development Documents or ‘Plans’ are either statutory (Development Plan Documents) or non-statutory (Supplementary Planning Documents). Development Plan Documents (DPDs) carry more weight as they are subject to an independent examination by a Planning Inspector before they are adopted. Supplementary Planning Documents are not subject to such an examination. 2 Official Revised SA Scoping Report of Local Plan February 2020 1.3 Methodology The SEA/SA process consists of the following stages and is being undertaken in accordance with government guidance contained within Planning Practice Guidance (PPG): http://planningguidance.planningportal.gov.uk/blog/guidance/strategic-environmental- assessment-and-sustainability-appraisal/strategic-environmental-assessment-and- sustainability-appraisal-and-how-does-it-relate-to-strategic-environmental-assessment/ The methodology is as follows: • Stage A: Setting the context and objectives, establishing the baseline and deciding on the scope • Stage B: Developing and refining options • Stage C: Appraising the effects of the plan • Stage D: Consulting on the plan and the SEA/SA report • Stage E: Monitoring Implementation of the Plan The inter-relationship of the SA and Local Plan preparation process is set out in the diagram on the following page. 3 Official Revised SA Scoping Report of Local Plan February 2020 4 Official Revised SA Scoping Report of Local Plan February 2020 In the Scoping Report, Stage A of the methodology is further divided into five key tasks. This report summarises and completes Stage A of the Sustainability Appraisal process and accompanies the first informal stage of engagement on the Direction of Travel for the new Richmond Local Plan. STAGE A: Setting the context and objectives, establishing the baseline and deciding on the scope Stage A1 Identify other relevant plans, programmes and sustainability objectives that will influence the Local Plan Stage A2 Collect and develop relevant social, environmental and economic baseline information and define the character of the area Stage A3 Identify key sustainability issues for the Plan to address Stage A4 Develop the SA framework, consisting of the SA objectives, indicators and targets. Stage A5 Consult on the scope of the SA It should be noted that SA is an iterative process and some stages may need to be undertaken more than once. This Scoping Report includes some of the required elements of the final “Environmental Report” which is required by the SEA regulations. 1.4 Scope of the SA/SEA Baseline data and the development of the SEA/SA framework has been organised in accordance with the topics required by the SEA Directive and as outlined in the PPG. The scope of the baseline review has been refined to cover the broader spectrum of sustainability issues which reflect the combination of both SEA and SA assessments. 5 Official Revised SA Scoping Report of Local Plan February 2020 2. Setting the context and objectives, establishing the baseline and deciding on the scope 2.1 Task A1: Identify other relevant plans, programmes and sustainability objectives The development of the Plan may be influenced by other plans or programmes and by external environmental objectives such as those laid down in policies or legislation. Part of SEA Directive Annex 1a (e) requires an outline of the relationship with other relevant plans and programmes. Therefore, as part of this baseline review, a description of the most relevant policy context has been included in order to enable potential synergies to be highlighted and any inconsistencies and constraints to be identified. 2.2 Task A2: Develop relevant social, environmental and economic baseline information Baseline data has been collected as required by the SEA Directive and PPG. This data has been fed into the sustainability baseline. The scope of this data collection has been expanded to include several additional social and economic topic areas in order to address the full spectrum of sustainability issues. 2.3 Task A3: Identify key sustainability issues Within Richmond borough, certain sustainability issues are more significant than others. These issues will need to be highlighted as areas of concern within the Sustainability Appraisal. The key sustainability issues have been divided into social, environmental and economic. 2.4 Task A4: Develop the SA framework A sustainability framework with decision making criteria to test the performance of the Plan has been developed. This framework assists in comparing the various policies, options and proposals for the area in general and for identified sites, in particular, in relation to their spatial location, proposed scale of growth and mix of land uses. The objectives originally developed for the Sustainability Appraisal of the Core Strategy have been subsequently reviewed as part of the Development Management Plan, Twickenham Area Action Plan and 2018 Local Plan. For the purpose of preparing this report, the objectives have been reviewed again and compared to other national, regional and local documents. The objectives for the SEA/SA can be viewed in this report. Some of the objectives have been amended to reflect previous comments from stakeholders, but their general thrust for this borough remains the same. The objectives may be refined further based on consultations with statutory bodies and key stakeholders. 6 Official Revised SA Scoping Report of Local Plan February 2020 2.5 Task A5: Consulting on the scope of the SA The Scoping Report will be issued to the statutory consultees along with a covering letter clarifying their input and requirements within the statutory five-week period. Specific consultation questions are included within this document to assist consultees with their responses. Other relevant stakeholders are also invited to comment. A copy of all consultation questions can be found in Appendix 1. Following the consultation on the draft Scoping Report, the Council will consider and analyse all representations received. Where applicable, changes will be made to the SA Scoping Report and/or SA Framework, and a final revised Scoping Report will be issued later this year. 7 Official Revised SA Scoping Report of Local Plan February 2020 Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Non-Technical Summary .................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 2 1.1 The Purpose of the SA/SEA .................................................................................... 2 1.2 The Local Plan ........................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Methodology ........................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Scope of the SA/SEA .............................................................................................. 5 2. Setting the context and objectives, establishing the baseline and deciding on the scope ...................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Task A1: Identify other
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hampton Water Treatment Works
    Hampton Water Treatment Works Environmental Permit Application, Tranche A Specified Generator Controls, Non -Technical Summary ________________________________ ___________________ Report for Thames Water Utilities Ltd ED12448 ED 12448 – Hampton - NTS Report | Issue 2.0 | Date 09/09/2019 Ricardo Energy & Environment Hampton Water Treatment Works | i Customer: Contact: Thames Water Utilities Ltd Andy Collins Ricardo Energy & Environment Customer reference: FA1300/Lot 3/4700328190 Gemini Building, Harwell, Didcot, OX11 0QR, United Kingdom ED11941 Confidentiality, copyright & reproduction: t: +44 (0) 1235 75 3044 e: [email protected] This report is the Copyright of Ricardo Energy & Environment, a trading name of Ricardo-AEA Ltd and has been prepared by Ricardo Energy & Ricardo is certificated to ISO9001, ISO14001 Environment under contract to Thames Water and OHSAS18001 Utilities Ltd for “Permitting application delivery for Medium Combustion Plant (MCP) and Specified Author: Generators (SGs) – Specification 2” of 15/05/19. Lucinda Hall, Andy Collins The contents of this report may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor passed to any Approved By: organisation or person without the specific prior written permission of the Commercial Manager at Andy Collins Ricardo Energy & Environment. Ricardo Energy & Environment accepts no liability whatsoever to Date: any third party for any loss or damage arising from any interpretation or use of the information 09 September 2019 contained in this report, or reliance on any views expressed therein, other than the liability that is Ricardo Energy & Environment reference: agreed in the said contract. Ref: ED12448 – Hampton - NTS Report Issue 2.0 Ricardo in Confidence Ref: Ricardo/ED12448 – Hampton - NTS Report/Issue 2.0 Ricardo Energy & Environment Hampton Water Treatment Works | ii Table of contents 1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Airports Nps - Habitats Regulations Assessment Appendix B Appropriate Assessment of Short List Alternatives
    AIRPORTS NPS - HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT APPENDIX B APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT OF SHORT LIST ALTERNATIVES JUNE 2018 AIRPORTS NPS - HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT APPENDIX B APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT OF SHORT LIST ALTERNATIVES Department for Transport Project no: 70030195 Date: June 2018 WSP The Forum Barnfield Road Exeter EX1 1QR Tel: (01392) 229700 www.wsp.com iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................ 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 1.2 HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT (HRA) SCREENING ................... 1 1.3 APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT (AA) ............................................................... 2 1.4 IN-COMBINATION EFFECTS ON NATURA 2000 AND RAMSAR SITES ....... 3 1.5 CONSULTATION ............................................................................................... 5 2 EFFECTS OF DISTURBANCE ..................................................... 6 2.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 6 2.2 RELEVANT EUROPEAN SITES ........................................................................ 6 2.3 APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT ........................................................................ 7 2.4 SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS ON INTEGRITY AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE SCHEMES ...................... 13 2.5 AVOIDANCE AND MITIGATION MEASURES ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Monitoring Report for Financial Year 2005/6
    Local Development Framework UDP / LDF Annual Monitoring Report for financial year 2005/6 submitted December 2006 Based Upon Ordnance Survey data. © Crown copyright. All rights reserved 100019441 [2006]." If you need this document in Braille, large print, audio tape, or another language, please contact us on 020 8891 7322 or minicom 020 8831 6001 Albanian Arabic Bengali Farsi Gujarati Punjabi Urdu The Local Development Framework for the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames is prepared by the Policy Section of the Environment Directorate Policy Section Environment Directorate London Borough of Richmond upon Thames Civic Centre 44 York Street Twickenham Middlesex TW1 3BZ Telephone 020 8891 7322 Fax 020 8891 7768 Email [email protected] Website www.richmond.gov.uk UDP/ LDF Annual Monitoring Report 2005/6 London Borough of Richmond upon Thames Annual Monitoring Report for financial year2005/6 Published January 2007 Produced by Policy & Research Section. Contact [email protected] g:\data&research\AMR2006\AMR 2005-6 Final Report.doc 14/02/2007 14:01 UDP/ LDF Annual Monitoring Report 2005/6 Contents page 1. Introduction 1 2. Non-technical summary 3 3. Richmond upon Thames Profile 5 4. Progress with Unitary Development Plan & Local Development 11 Framework 5. Implementation of UDP policies & proposals 19 6. Open Environment 2 7. Conservation & Built Environment 26 8. Transport 29 9. Housing 36 10. Employment 42 11. Community Uses and Local Services 51 12. Town Centres & Access to Shopping 58 13. Sustainability Indicators 66 Appendices 1. Implementation of Proposal Sites 90 2. Key shops and services available in local centres 93 3.
    [Show full text]
  • TWO HUNDRED YEARS of RUISLIP RESERVOIR by Eileen M. Bowlt
    TWO HUNDRED YEARS OF RUISLIP RESERVOIR by Eileen M. Bowlt This paper traces the history of Ruislip Earlier concerns had focused on canals, such Reservoir and feeder, and the part played as the New River in 1613, that would bring by the Grand Junction Canal Company and drinking water into central London and not the Grand Junction Waterworks Company on navigation. Several 17th and 18th century in the planning and construction of them. It plans had foundered for financial reasons illustrates the difficulties and tensions that and by the end of the 18th century, arose between the two companies because businessmen realised that any canal that was the Canal was used for dual purposes, to to succeed would have to be navigable as provide a navigable waterway into London ‘however beneficial the work might be for the and to supply drinking water to public in procuring a better and more regular Paddington. supply of water for domestic use and safety in cases of fire, the returns of profit would not for many years be answerable to the Two hundred years ago, on the 27 June 1811 expense.’ iii John Rennie, prominent civil engineer, wrote ‘A Reservoir of about sixty acres in extent is Grand Junction Canal Company now constructing in the Vale of Ruislip. The bank is almost completed and the Culvert In 1792 James Barnes (1739-1819), Civil and Pipe for the discharge of the water is Engineer (and a Banbury brewer), was building.’ i In December 1811 he was able to commissioned by the Marquis of report that the reservoir had been completed, Buckingham to make a preliminary survey of was nearly full of water and showed no signs a probable route for a canal.
    [Show full text]
  • Richmond Biodiversity Action Plan
    1 The Local Biodiversity Action Plan for Richmond Executive Summary This document is the culmination of many years’ work by many organisations and charities, including the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames, London Natural History Society, London Wildlife Trust, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, The Royal Parks, Thames Landscape Strategy and Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust, professional bodies, communities and local residents within the borough. The Local Biodiversity Action Plan (LBAP) in Richmond sets out the strategic context of biodiversity, which was first raised at the Rio Summit in 1992. This led to the development of a UK Biodiversity Action Plan, which has raised public awareness of biodiversity and provided guidance on the preparation of Local Biodiversity Action Plans. This Local Biodiversity Action Plan for the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames sets out the framework for the protection, conservation and enhancement of wildlife within Richmond upon Thames. LBAPs are seen as an innovative approach to wildlife conservation as they are moving away from the traditional ‘naturalist’ approach, which to many appears elitist and unwelcoming, and are striving to broaden the constituency of those interested and involved. It is a widely held belief that making a Biodiversity Action Plan relevant to local people through active involvement and consultation will ensure pro-active action ‘on the ground’. The list of habitats and species in this plan is not exhaustive, although the Richmond Biodiversity Action Plan aims to concentrate on and prioritise those habitats and species, which are rare, in decline, or characteristic of Richmond, which will help raise the profile of biodiversity. The priority habitats within this borough, which are also of regional and national importance, are: Acid Grassland, Ancient Parkland/Veteran Trees, Broadleaved Woodland, Reedbeds and Tidal Thames.
    [Show full text]
  • Busing Service 2018-19
    Busing service 2018-19 From your door to our door Shuttle service ACS Cobham operates an extensive busing service for families, Selected buses also offer a Shuttle service to pick up and drop off to transport children safely and efficiently between home and school. students at specific points along a designated route: • Door-to-Door and Shuttle options Cobham (Zone 1) • Experienced and safe drivers Oxshott (Zone 2) • Fees charged to recover costs only. East/West Horsley (Zone 2) We understand the many challenges facing both local and relocating Esher (Zone 2) families and the school Transport Co-ordinator will make every effort Walton (Zone 2) to arrange busing for your children from their first day of school. West Byfleet (Zone 2) In order to ensure the process runs smoothly, we would appreciate your assistance by informing us of your home address as soon as Weybridge (Zone 2) possible. Please note that requests received after 1st August may not be Woking (Zone 2) processed in time for the start of the school year. However, rest assured that every step will be taken to complete your busing requests with Guildford (Zone 3) speed and efficiency. Putney Heath (Zone 3) Door-to-Door service Suburban area All families living within the Zone 1-3 shaded areas on the map overleaf can apply to use our premium Door-to-Door busing service. H D L S C O D A I D E A A R W G D A A W D B R K R Drayton N W A GD G R N LIME E S 5 E SU S R N Hayes R E S T W .
    [Show full text]
  • The River Thames
    Landscape and Nature Conservation Designations along the River Thames, Hurst Park and Meadows Overview: The River Thames - forms the northern boundary of the Borough of Elmbridge, which is characterised by attractive, historic and natural environments, with distinctive local communities. The entire length of the Thames through Elmbridge has the designation of a Site of Nature Conservation Importance (including Duck’s Eyot and the riverbank margins). Habitat at the water’s edge and on the eyots supports nesting and resident mallard, diving ducks, mandarin ducks, pochard, grebe, moorhen, coot, swans, Egyptian geese, Canada geese; visiting heron, barnacle geese, cormorant, tern, black-headed gull, hobby, summer migrants and kingfisher. The vegetation that overhangs the river margins and the relative tranquillity of the Thames here is essential for these water birds to thrive. Hurst Meadows - a rare traditional Thames wild flower and grassland flood meadow, also an SNCI by virtue of its exceptionally rich and diverse habitat and its rare and unusual flora, which include autumn squill, great burnet, and bee orchid. In the course of a year it is possible to see butterflies, moths, crickets, pollinating insects and many others. In high summer the long grass and wild flowers are alive and buzzing. In autumn there are many species of fungus. Birds include starling and thrush, now on the red list, and the tawny owl. The area also supports seven or eight species of bats, which use the river for foraging and as a fly-way. Summer migrants and bats feed on insects over the parkland. On a warm twilight there are pipistrelles and summer migrants visible darting after insects.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Monitoring Report 2006/07 Employment & Economic Activity
    UDP/ LDF Annual Monitoring Report 2006/7 London Borough of Richmond upon Thames Annual Monitoring Report for financial year2006/7 Published December 2007 Produced by Policy & Research Section. Contact – [email protected] UDP/ LDF Annual Monitoring Report 2006/7 Contents page 1. Introduction 1 2. Non-technical summary 3 3. Richmond upon Thames Profile 5 4. Progress with Local Development Framework 12 5. Implementation of UDP policies & proposals 18 6. Open Environment 24 7. Conservation & Built Environment 26 8. Transport 29 9. Housing 37 10. Employment 44 11. Community Uses and Local Services 55 12. Town Centres & Access to Shopping 62 13. Sustainability Appraisal Indicators 71 1. Use of policies in determining planning applications for 99 development completed in 2006/7 financial year 2. Implementation of Proposal Sites 103 Appendices 3. Key shops and services available in local centres 106 4. Report of Appeal Decisions Monitoring 2006-7 108 5. Guide to the Use Classes Order 118 List of indicators Indicator page 1: Number of Departures from development plan 18 2: Appeal Decisions allowed 18 3: Implementation of proposal sites 19 4: Planning Obligations agreed each year 20 5: Loss of/ inappropriate development on open space designations 24 6: Loss of / inappropriate development on nature conservation designations 24 7: Loss of/ inappropriate development on Public Open Space 24 8: Listed Buildings & Buildings of Townscape Merit demolished 26 9: Buildings on “At Risk” Register 26 10: Conservation Area Studies completed 27 11: Article
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Reservoir Provisions in Relation to Large Raised Reservoirs FD2701 – Objective 1
    Evaluation of the Impact of the First Phase of the FWMA- 2010 Reservoir Provisions in Relation to Large Raised Reservoirs FD2701 – Objective 1 March 2020 Joint Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Research and Development Programme Title Applying a Risk-based Approach and Improving the Evidence Base Related to Small Raised Reservoirs Evaluation of the Impact of the First Phase of the FWMA-2010 Reservoir Provisions in Relation to Large Raised Reservoirs Objective 1 report - FD2701 Produced: March 2020 Funded by the joint Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Research and Development Programme (FCERM R&D). The joint FCERM R&D programme comprises Defra, Environment Agency, Natural Resources Wales and Welsh Government. The programme conducts, manages and promotes flood and coastal erosion risk management research and development. This is a report of research carried out by Mott Macdonald, on behalf of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Research contractor: Mott Macdonald Authors: Peter Brinded, Carrie Eller, Simon Golds, James Penman, Omar Raja, Alan Warren Publishing organisation Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Flood & Coastal Erosion Risk Management, 2 Marsham Street Seacole Building London SW1P 4DF © Crown copyright 2018 Copyright in the typographical arrangement and design rests with the Crown. This publication (excluding the logo) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright with the title and source of the publication specified. The views expressed in this document are not necessarily those of Defra.
    [Show full text]
  • HRA Report 2019
    Greater London Authority Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Modifications Update Greater London Authority December 2019 Greater London Authority Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Modifications Update Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Isla Hoffmann Heap James Riley Max Wade Consultant Ecologist Technical Director Technical Director Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position 0 23/08/17 Draft for initial JR James Riley Associate client check 1 01/09/17 Draft for initial JR James Riley Associate Natural England comments 2 31/10/17 Updated to JR James Riley Associate account for Draft for public consultation November 2017 version 3 17/07/18 Updated to take JR James Riley Technical account of Director Natural England comments, the Sweetman ruling of the ECJ and Early Suggested Changes to the London Plan 4 28/11/19 Update to JR James Riley Technical Appendix B and Director conclusion to account for post- examination modifications Prepared for: Greater London Authority AECOM Greater London Authority Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Modifications Update Prepared for: Greater London Authority Prepared by: AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited Midpoint, Alencon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP United Kingdom T: +44(0)1256 310200 aecom.com © 2019 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document.
    [Show full text]
  • London Bird Report ——— No.79 for the Year 2014 Produced by the Lbr Editorial Board
    1 LONDON BIRD REPORT ——— NO.79 FOR THE YEAR 2014 PRODUCED BY THE LBR EDITORIAL BOARD PUBLISHED MAY 2016 2 LONDON BIRD REPORT NO. 79 3 CONTENTS ——— Introduction and Acknowledgements – Pete Lambert ............................... 5 Appendix I & II: Escapes and Hybrids – Pete Lambert ................................. 168 Rarities Committee and Recorders ...................................................... 7 Appendix III: Non-proven & non-submitted records and records in circulation ..... 175 Recording Arrangements .................................................................. 8 First and Last Dates of Regular Migrants ................................................. 178 Map of the London Area ................................................................... 9 Mini-gazetteer of Sites ................................................................... 10 Ringing Report – Paul Roper ........................................................... 179 Review of the Year – Nick Rutter .......................................................15 The Breeding Bird Survey in London – Ian Woodward ............................ 186 Contributors to the Systematic List ................................................... 19 The Peregrine Falcon in Inner London - David Johnson...........................189 Blyth’s Reed Warbler at Wanstead Flats, June 29th 2014 - Nick Croft ....... 200 Birds of the London Area ................................................................ 27 Changes to the London Area List and Published Rarities - Andrew Self .....
    [Show full text]
  • Draft London Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Update
    Draft London Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Update Greater London Authority July 2018 Greater London Authority Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Screening Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Isla Hoffmann Heap James Riley Max Wade Senior Ecologist Technical Director Technical Director Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position 0 23/08/17 Draft for initial JR James Riley Associate client check 1 01/09/17 Draft for initial JR James Riley Associate Natural England comments 2 31/10/17 Updated to JR James Riley Associate account for Draft for public consultation November 2017 version 3 17/07/18 Updated to take JR James Riley Technical account of Director Natural England comments, the Sweetman ruling of the ECJ and Early Suggested Changes to the London Plan Prepared for: Greater London Authority AECOM Greater London Authority Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Screening Prepared for: Greater London Authority Prepared by: AECOM Environment and Infrastructure Ltd Midpoint Alencon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP UK T: +44(0)1256 310200 aecom.com © 2018 AECOM Environment and Infrastructure Ltd. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Environment and Infrastructure Ltd (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM.
    [Show full text]