Draft Scoping Report 2020
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Hampton Water Treatment Works
Hampton Water Treatment Works Environmental Permit Application, Tranche A Specified Generator Controls, Non -Technical Summary ________________________________ ___________________ Report for Thames Water Utilities Ltd ED12448 ED 12448 – Hampton - NTS Report | Issue 2.0 | Date 09/09/2019 Ricardo Energy & Environment Hampton Water Treatment Works | i Customer: Contact: Thames Water Utilities Ltd Andy Collins Ricardo Energy & Environment Customer reference: FA1300/Lot 3/4700328190 Gemini Building, Harwell, Didcot, OX11 0QR, United Kingdom ED11941 Confidentiality, copyright & reproduction: t: +44 (0) 1235 75 3044 e: [email protected] This report is the Copyright of Ricardo Energy & Environment, a trading name of Ricardo-AEA Ltd and has been prepared by Ricardo Energy & Ricardo is certificated to ISO9001, ISO14001 Environment under contract to Thames Water and OHSAS18001 Utilities Ltd for “Permitting application delivery for Medium Combustion Plant (MCP) and Specified Author: Generators (SGs) – Specification 2” of 15/05/19. Lucinda Hall, Andy Collins The contents of this report may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor passed to any Approved By: organisation or person without the specific prior written permission of the Commercial Manager at Andy Collins Ricardo Energy & Environment. Ricardo Energy & Environment accepts no liability whatsoever to Date: any third party for any loss or damage arising from any interpretation or use of the information 09 September 2019 contained in this report, or reliance on any views expressed therein, other than the liability that is Ricardo Energy & Environment reference: agreed in the said contract. Ref: ED12448 – Hampton - NTS Report Issue 2.0 Ricardo in Confidence Ref: Ricardo/ED12448 – Hampton - NTS Report/Issue 2.0 Ricardo Energy & Environment Hampton Water Treatment Works | ii Table of contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... -
Airports Nps - Habitats Regulations Assessment Appendix B Appropriate Assessment of Short List Alternatives
AIRPORTS NPS - HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT APPENDIX B APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT OF SHORT LIST ALTERNATIVES JUNE 2018 AIRPORTS NPS - HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT APPENDIX B APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT OF SHORT LIST ALTERNATIVES Department for Transport Project no: 70030195 Date: June 2018 WSP The Forum Barnfield Road Exeter EX1 1QR Tel: (01392) 229700 www.wsp.com iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................ 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 1.2 HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT (HRA) SCREENING ................... 1 1.3 APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT (AA) ............................................................... 2 1.4 IN-COMBINATION EFFECTS ON NATURA 2000 AND RAMSAR SITES ....... 3 1.5 CONSULTATION ............................................................................................... 5 2 EFFECTS OF DISTURBANCE ..................................................... 6 2.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 6 2.2 RELEVANT EUROPEAN SITES ........................................................................ 6 2.3 APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT ........................................................................ 7 2.4 SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS ON INTEGRITY AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE SCHEMES ...................... 13 2.5 AVOIDANCE AND MITIGATION MEASURES ............................................... -
Annual Monitoring Report for Financial Year 2005/6
Local Development Framework UDP / LDF Annual Monitoring Report for financial year 2005/6 submitted December 2006 Based Upon Ordnance Survey data. © Crown copyright. All rights reserved 100019441 [2006]." If you need this document in Braille, large print, audio tape, or another language, please contact us on 020 8891 7322 or minicom 020 8831 6001 Albanian Arabic Bengali Farsi Gujarati Punjabi Urdu The Local Development Framework for the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames is prepared by the Policy Section of the Environment Directorate Policy Section Environment Directorate London Borough of Richmond upon Thames Civic Centre 44 York Street Twickenham Middlesex TW1 3BZ Telephone 020 8891 7322 Fax 020 8891 7768 Email [email protected] Website www.richmond.gov.uk UDP/ LDF Annual Monitoring Report 2005/6 London Borough of Richmond upon Thames Annual Monitoring Report for financial year2005/6 Published January 2007 Produced by Policy & Research Section. Contact [email protected] g:\data&research\AMR2006\AMR 2005-6 Final Report.doc 14/02/2007 14:01 UDP/ LDF Annual Monitoring Report 2005/6 Contents page 1. Introduction 1 2. Non-technical summary 3 3. Richmond upon Thames Profile 5 4. Progress with Unitary Development Plan & Local Development 11 Framework 5. Implementation of UDP policies & proposals 19 6. Open Environment 2 7. Conservation & Built Environment 26 8. Transport 29 9. Housing 36 10. Employment 42 11. Community Uses and Local Services 51 12. Town Centres & Access to Shopping 58 13. Sustainability Indicators 66 Appendices 1. Implementation of Proposal Sites 90 2. Key shops and services available in local centres 93 3. -
TWO HUNDRED YEARS of RUISLIP RESERVOIR by Eileen M. Bowlt
TWO HUNDRED YEARS OF RUISLIP RESERVOIR by Eileen M. Bowlt This paper traces the history of Ruislip Earlier concerns had focused on canals, such Reservoir and feeder, and the part played as the New River in 1613, that would bring by the Grand Junction Canal Company and drinking water into central London and not the Grand Junction Waterworks Company on navigation. Several 17th and 18th century in the planning and construction of them. It plans had foundered for financial reasons illustrates the difficulties and tensions that and by the end of the 18th century, arose between the two companies because businessmen realised that any canal that was the Canal was used for dual purposes, to to succeed would have to be navigable as provide a navigable waterway into London ‘however beneficial the work might be for the and to supply drinking water to public in procuring a better and more regular Paddington. supply of water for domestic use and safety in cases of fire, the returns of profit would not for many years be answerable to the Two hundred years ago, on the 27 June 1811 expense.’ iii John Rennie, prominent civil engineer, wrote ‘A Reservoir of about sixty acres in extent is Grand Junction Canal Company now constructing in the Vale of Ruislip. The bank is almost completed and the Culvert In 1792 James Barnes (1739-1819), Civil and Pipe for the discharge of the water is Engineer (and a Banbury brewer), was building.’ i In December 1811 he was able to commissioned by the Marquis of report that the reservoir had been completed, Buckingham to make a preliminary survey of was nearly full of water and showed no signs a probable route for a canal. -
Richmond Biodiversity Action Plan
1 The Local Biodiversity Action Plan for Richmond Executive Summary This document is the culmination of many years’ work by many organisations and charities, including the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames, London Natural History Society, London Wildlife Trust, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, The Royal Parks, Thames Landscape Strategy and Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust, professional bodies, communities and local residents within the borough. The Local Biodiversity Action Plan (LBAP) in Richmond sets out the strategic context of biodiversity, which was first raised at the Rio Summit in 1992. This led to the development of a UK Biodiversity Action Plan, which has raised public awareness of biodiversity and provided guidance on the preparation of Local Biodiversity Action Plans. This Local Biodiversity Action Plan for the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames sets out the framework for the protection, conservation and enhancement of wildlife within Richmond upon Thames. LBAPs are seen as an innovative approach to wildlife conservation as they are moving away from the traditional ‘naturalist’ approach, which to many appears elitist and unwelcoming, and are striving to broaden the constituency of those interested and involved. It is a widely held belief that making a Biodiversity Action Plan relevant to local people through active involvement and consultation will ensure pro-active action ‘on the ground’. The list of habitats and species in this plan is not exhaustive, although the Richmond Biodiversity Action Plan aims to concentrate on and prioritise those habitats and species, which are rare, in decline, or characteristic of Richmond, which will help raise the profile of biodiversity. The priority habitats within this borough, which are also of regional and national importance, are: Acid Grassland, Ancient Parkland/Veteran Trees, Broadleaved Woodland, Reedbeds and Tidal Thames. -
Busing Service 2018-19
Busing service 2018-19 From your door to our door Shuttle service ACS Cobham operates an extensive busing service for families, Selected buses also offer a Shuttle service to pick up and drop off to transport children safely and efficiently between home and school. students at specific points along a designated route: • Door-to-Door and Shuttle options Cobham (Zone 1) • Experienced and safe drivers Oxshott (Zone 2) • Fees charged to recover costs only. East/West Horsley (Zone 2) We understand the many challenges facing both local and relocating Esher (Zone 2) families and the school Transport Co-ordinator will make every effort Walton (Zone 2) to arrange busing for your children from their first day of school. West Byfleet (Zone 2) In order to ensure the process runs smoothly, we would appreciate your assistance by informing us of your home address as soon as Weybridge (Zone 2) possible. Please note that requests received after 1st August may not be Woking (Zone 2) processed in time for the start of the school year. However, rest assured that every step will be taken to complete your busing requests with Guildford (Zone 3) speed and efficiency. Putney Heath (Zone 3) Door-to-Door service Suburban area All families living within the Zone 1-3 shaded areas on the map overleaf can apply to use our premium Door-to-Door busing service. H D L S C O D A I D E A A R W G D A A W D B R K R Drayton N W A GD G R N LIME E S 5 E SU S R N Hayes R E S T W . -
The River Thames
Landscape and Nature Conservation Designations along the River Thames, Hurst Park and Meadows Overview: The River Thames - forms the northern boundary of the Borough of Elmbridge, which is characterised by attractive, historic and natural environments, with distinctive local communities. The entire length of the Thames through Elmbridge has the designation of a Site of Nature Conservation Importance (including Duck’s Eyot and the riverbank margins). Habitat at the water’s edge and on the eyots supports nesting and resident mallard, diving ducks, mandarin ducks, pochard, grebe, moorhen, coot, swans, Egyptian geese, Canada geese; visiting heron, barnacle geese, cormorant, tern, black-headed gull, hobby, summer migrants and kingfisher. The vegetation that overhangs the river margins and the relative tranquillity of the Thames here is essential for these water birds to thrive. Hurst Meadows - a rare traditional Thames wild flower and grassland flood meadow, also an SNCI by virtue of its exceptionally rich and diverse habitat and its rare and unusual flora, which include autumn squill, great burnet, and bee orchid. In the course of a year it is possible to see butterflies, moths, crickets, pollinating insects and many others. In high summer the long grass and wild flowers are alive and buzzing. In autumn there are many species of fungus. Birds include starling and thrush, now on the red list, and the tawny owl. The area also supports seven or eight species of bats, which use the river for foraging and as a fly-way. Summer migrants and bats feed on insects over the parkland. On a warm twilight there are pipistrelles and summer migrants visible darting after insects. -
Annual Monitoring Report 2006/07 Employment & Economic Activity
UDP/ LDF Annual Monitoring Report 2006/7 London Borough of Richmond upon Thames Annual Monitoring Report for financial year2006/7 Published December 2007 Produced by Policy & Research Section. Contact – [email protected] UDP/ LDF Annual Monitoring Report 2006/7 Contents page 1. Introduction 1 2. Non-technical summary 3 3. Richmond upon Thames Profile 5 4. Progress with Local Development Framework 12 5. Implementation of UDP policies & proposals 18 6. Open Environment 24 7. Conservation & Built Environment 26 8. Transport 29 9. Housing 37 10. Employment 44 11. Community Uses and Local Services 55 12. Town Centres & Access to Shopping 62 13. Sustainability Appraisal Indicators 71 1. Use of policies in determining planning applications for 99 development completed in 2006/7 financial year 2. Implementation of Proposal Sites 103 Appendices 3. Key shops and services available in local centres 106 4. Report of Appeal Decisions Monitoring 2006-7 108 5. Guide to the Use Classes Order 118 List of indicators Indicator page 1: Number of Departures from development plan 18 2: Appeal Decisions allowed 18 3: Implementation of proposal sites 19 4: Planning Obligations agreed each year 20 5: Loss of/ inappropriate development on open space designations 24 6: Loss of / inappropriate development on nature conservation designations 24 7: Loss of/ inappropriate development on Public Open Space 24 8: Listed Buildings & Buildings of Townscape Merit demolished 26 9: Buildings on “At Risk” Register 26 10: Conservation Area Studies completed 27 11: Article -
2010 Reservoir Provisions in Relation to Large Raised Reservoirs FD2701 – Objective 1
Evaluation of the Impact of the First Phase of the FWMA- 2010 Reservoir Provisions in Relation to Large Raised Reservoirs FD2701 – Objective 1 March 2020 Joint Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Research and Development Programme Title Applying a Risk-based Approach and Improving the Evidence Base Related to Small Raised Reservoirs Evaluation of the Impact of the First Phase of the FWMA-2010 Reservoir Provisions in Relation to Large Raised Reservoirs Objective 1 report - FD2701 Produced: March 2020 Funded by the joint Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Research and Development Programme (FCERM R&D). The joint FCERM R&D programme comprises Defra, Environment Agency, Natural Resources Wales and Welsh Government. The programme conducts, manages and promotes flood and coastal erosion risk management research and development. This is a report of research carried out by Mott Macdonald, on behalf of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Research contractor: Mott Macdonald Authors: Peter Brinded, Carrie Eller, Simon Golds, James Penman, Omar Raja, Alan Warren Publishing organisation Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Flood & Coastal Erosion Risk Management, 2 Marsham Street Seacole Building London SW1P 4DF © Crown copyright 2018 Copyright in the typographical arrangement and design rests with the Crown. This publication (excluding the logo) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright with the title and source of the publication specified. The views expressed in this document are not necessarily those of Defra. -
HRA Report 2019
Greater London Authority Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Modifications Update Greater London Authority December 2019 Greater London Authority Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Modifications Update Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Isla Hoffmann Heap James Riley Max Wade Consultant Ecologist Technical Director Technical Director Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position 0 23/08/17 Draft for initial JR James Riley Associate client check 1 01/09/17 Draft for initial JR James Riley Associate Natural England comments 2 31/10/17 Updated to JR James Riley Associate account for Draft for public consultation November 2017 version 3 17/07/18 Updated to take JR James Riley Technical account of Director Natural England comments, the Sweetman ruling of the ECJ and Early Suggested Changes to the London Plan 4 28/11/19 Update to JR James Riley Technical Appendix B and Director conclusion to account for post- examination modifications Prepared for: Greater London Authority AECOM Greater London Authority Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Modifications Update Prepared for: Greater London Authority Prepared by: AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited Midpoint, Alencon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP United Kingdom T: +44(0)1256 310200 aecom.com © 2019 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. -
London Bird Report ——— No.79 for the Year 2014 Produced by the Lbr Editorial Board
1 LONDON BIRD REPORT ——— NO.79 FOR THE YEAR 2014 PRODUCED BY THE LBR EDITORIAL BOARD PUBLISHED MAY 2016 2 LONDON BIRD REPORT NO. 79 3 CONTENTS ——— Introduction and Acknowledgements – Pete Lambert ............................... 5 Appendix I & II: Escapes and Hybrids – Pete Lambert ................................. 168 Rarities Committee and Recorders ...................................................... 7 Appendix III: Non-proven & non-submitted records and records in circulation ..... 175 Recording Arrangements .................................................................. 8 First and Last Dates of Regular Migrants ................................................. 178 Map of the London Area ................................................................... 9 Mini-gazetteer of Sites ................................................................... 10 Ringing Report – Paul Roper ........................................................... 179 Review of the Year – Nick Rutter .......................................................15 The Breeding Bird Survey in London – Ian Woodward ............................ 186 Contributors to the Systematic List ................................................... 19 The Peregrine Falcon in Inner London - David Johnson...........................189 Blyth’s Reed Warbler at Wanstead Flats, June 29th 2014 - Nick Croft ....... 200 Birds of the London Area ................................................................ 27 Changes to the London Area List and Published Rarities - Andrew Self ..... -
Draft London Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Update
Draft London Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Update Greater London Authority July 2018 Greater London Authority Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Screening Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Isla Hoffmann Heap James Riley Max Wade Senior Ecologist Technical Director Technical Director Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position 0 23/08/17 Draft for initial JR James Riley Associate client check 1 01/09/17 Draft for initial JR James Riley Associate Natural England comments 2 31/10/17 Updated to JR James Riley Associate account for Draft for public consultation November 2017 version 3 17/07/18 Updated to take JR James Riley Technical account of Director Natural England comments, the Sweetman ruling of the ECJ and Early Suggested Changes to the London Plan Prepared for: Greater London Authority AECOM Greater London Authority Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Screening Prepared for: Greater London Authority Prepared by: AECOM Environment and Infrastructure Ltd Midpoint Alencon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP UK T: +44(0)1256 310200 aecom.com © 2018 AECOM Environment and Infrastructure Ltd. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Environment and Infrastructure Ltd (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM.