The River Thames
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Elmbridge Borough Council Green Belt Boundary Review Annex Report 2 - Local Area Assessment Pro-Formas
Elmbridge Borough Council Green Belt Boundary Review Annex Report 2 - Local Area Assessment Pro-formas Issue Rev C | 14 March 2016 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 243074-00 Ove Arup & Partners Ltd 13 Fitzroy Street London W1T 4BQ United Kingdom www.arup.com Local Area 1 Area (ha) 453.1 Location Plan Strategic Area Strategic Area C lies on the fringes of a much wider area of strategic Green Belt which extends Summary across much of Surrey. Its strategic role in Elmbridge is to prevent the town of Oxshott / Cobham from merging with Ashtead and Leatherhead / Bookham / Fetcham in Mole Valley, though it is also important for preventing encroachment into open countryside. Much of the Area retains an unspoilt and open, rural character, though in some isolated localities ribbon development along roads and the loss of arable farmland to horse paddocks has diminished this character somewhat. At the strategic level, the Strategic Area plays an important role in meeting the fundamental aim of Green Belt policy to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open. Assessment of the Strategic Area against the relevant NPPF Purposes is as follows: - Purpose 1 – Meets the Purpose moderately by acting as an important barrier to potential sprawl from the Guildford urban area, Ash and Tongham urban area, Dorking, and Leatherhead / Bookham / Fetcham / Ashtead. - Purpose 2 – Meets the Purpose strongly by establishing important gaps between a number of Surrey towns from merging into one another. -
Biodiversity Opportunity Areas: the Basis for Realising Surrey's Local
Biodiversity Opportunity Areas: The basis for realising Surrey’s ecological network Surrey Nature Partnership September 2019 (revised) Investing in our County’s future Contents: 1. Background 1.1 Why Biodiversity Opportunity Areas? 1.2 What exactly is a Biodiversity Opportunity Area? 1.3 Biodiversity Opportunity Areas in the planning system 2. The BOA Policy Statements 3. Delivering Biodiversity 2020 - where & how will it happen? 3.1 Some case-studies 3.1.1 Floodplain grazing-marsh in the River Wey catchment 3.1.2 Calcareous grassland restoration at Priest Hill, Epsom 3.1.3 Surrey’s heathlands 3.1.4 Priority habitat creation in the Holmesdale Valley 3.1.5 Wetland creation at Molesey Reservoirs 3.2 Summary of possible delivery mechanisms 4. References Figure 1: Surrey Biodiversity Opportunity Areas Appendix 1: Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statement format Appendix 2: Potential Priority habitat restoration and creation projects across Surrey (working list) Appendices 3-9: Policy Statements (separate documents) 3. Thames Valley Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (TV01-05) 4. Thames Basin Heaths Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (TBH01-07) 5. Thames Basin Lowlands Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (TBL01-04) 6. North Downs Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (ND01-08) 7. Wealden Greensands Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (WG01-13) 8. Low Weald Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (LW01-07) 9. River Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (R01-06) Appendix 10: BOA Objectives & Targets Summary (separate document) Written by: Mike Waite Chair, Biodiversity Working Group Biodiversity Opportunity Areas: The basis for realising Surrey’s ecological network, Sept 2019 (revised) 2 1. Background 1.1 Why Biodiversity Opportunity Areas? The concept of Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (BOAs) has been in development in Surrey since 2009. -
Molesey Hospital Critical!
++++++ News from your Molesey Conservative councillors ++++++ MAGICAL MOLESEY Christmas wouldn’t be the same without Magical Molesey T to kick off the festivities. This year’s event is on Wednesday H December 2nd in Molesey town E centre, from 5pm-7pm, with Molesey News fun for all the family. Issue 19: Autumn 2015 Editor: Steve Bax | Email: [email protected] | Web: www.moleseyconservatives.com | Twitter: @MoleseySteve STEVE Molesey SAYS: Hospital Hello and welcome to the Autumn Molesey News. I am Councillor Steve Bax and I edit this newsletter on behalf of the Molesey Conservative critical! Residents political group. Local NHS considers I hope you had an enjoyable summer, even if it may feel plan to close hospital like a distant memory now. OLESEY'S 120-year-old Your Molesey Conservative coun- Molesey Conservative councillor, One highlight for me was community hospital could cillors met with retired doctor Ken Dr Peter Szanto, whose wife used to being asked to represent the Mbe closed under new pro- Brown, chairman of the Molesey work for the NHS, visited Molesey Mayor of Elmbridge in the posals by the local health authority. Hospital League of Friends to discuss Hospital on November 5th. annual Riparian Challenge, Surrey Downs Clinical Commis- options for saving the hospital. He was assured staff will not lose part of the Great River Race. sioning Group (CCG) has reviewed Ken said the report is very thorough their jobs if Molesey Hospital closes, That meant being a inpatient and outpatient services at and will be difficult to challenge, but and that the CCG recognises that passenger in a boat rowed the community hospitals in its area he noted that the Elmbridge Commu- lack of public between Molesey and by Peter, Russell and Bob of (Molesey, New Epsom and Ewell nity Medical Team - a pilot scheme Cobham is a major issue. -
Watersplash Farm Environmental Permit Application Environmental
Watersplash Farm Environmental Permit Application Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan September 2017 Prepared on behalf of CEMEX UK Materials Limited Quay West at Media City UK, Trafford Wharf Road, Trafford Park, Manchester M17 1HH Tel: +44 161 874 8714 Email: [email protected] Watersplash Farm – Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan Document control Document: Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan Project: Watersplash Farm Environment Permit Application Client: CEMEX UK Materials Limited Job Number: A104530 File Origin: \\southampton14\Data\Projects\Cemex UK Operations (C05081)\A104530 (Watersplash Farm Environment Permit Application)\Reports Revision: Final Date: 05/09/2017 Prepared by: Checked by: Approved By: Alice Shaw Andrew Bowker Andrew Bowker Description of revision: www.wyg.com creative minds safe hands Watersplash Farm – Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Groundwater Management and Monitoring ............................................................................ 2 3.0 Surface Water Management and Monitoring .......................................................................... 5 4.0 Landfill Gas Management and Monitoring .............................................................................. 9 5.0 Meteorological Monitoring ....................................................................................................10 -
Hampton Water Treatment Works
Hampton Water Treatment Works Environmental Permit Application, Tranche A Specified Generator Controls, Non -Technical Summary ________________________________ ___________________ Report for Thames Water Utilities Ltd ED12448 ED 12448 – Hampton - NTS Report | Issue 2.0 | Date 09/09/2019 Ricardo Energy & Environment Hampton Water Treatment Works | i Customer: Contact: Thames Water Utilities Ltd Andy Collins Ricardo Energy & Environment Customer reference: FA1300/Lot 3/4700328190 Gemini Building, Harwell, Didcot, OX11 0QR, United Kingdom ED11941 Confidentiality, copyright & reproduction: t: +44 (0) 1235 75 3044 e: [email protected] This report is the Copyright of Ricardo Energy & Environment, a trading name of Ricardo-AEA Ltd and has been prepared by Ricardo Energy & Ricardo is certificated to ISO9001, ISO14001 Environment under contract to Thames Water and OHSAS18001 Utilities Ltd for “Permitting application delivery for Medium Combustion Plant (MCP) and Specified Author: Generators (SGs) – Specification 2” of 15/05/19. Lucinda Hall, Andy Collins The contents of this report may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor passed to any Approved By: organisation or person without the specific prior written permission of the Commercial Manager at Andy Collins Ricardo Energy & Environment. Ricardo Energy & Environment accepts no liability whatsoever to Date: any third party for any loss or damage arising from any interpretation or use of the information 09 September 2019 contained in this report, or reliance on any views expressed therein, other than the liability that is Ricardo Energy & Environment reference: agreed in the said contract. Ref: ED12448 – Hampton - NTS Report Issue 2.0 Ricardo in Confidence Ref: Ricardo/ED12448 – Hampton - NTS Report/Issue 2.0 Ricardo Energy & Environment Hampton Water Treatment Works | ii Table of contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... -
EIA Scoping Report
View of Bell weir on the River Thames at Hythe End, from downstream of the Channel Section 1 outlet. River Thames Scheme - Capacity Improvements and Flood Channel Project Draft Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Report for Consultation June 2017 Published by: Environment Agency Horizon house, Deanery Road Bristol BS1 5AH Email: enquiries@environment- agency.gov.uk www.environment-agency.gov.uk © Environment Agency 2011 Further copies of this report are available from our publications catalogue: All rights reserved. This document may be http://publications.environment- reproduced with prior permission of agency.gov.uk or our National Customer the Environment Agency. Contact Centre: T: 03708 506506 Email: enquiries@environment- agency.gov.uk. ii Quality Assurance Project name River Thames Scheme Capacity Improvements and Flood Channel Project –EIA Scoping Report Project 1B1S reference ENV_IMSE500260_0184 Date 16 June 2017 Version number P02 Author GBV – Kerry Quinton, Vicky Lutyens, Jenny Marshall-Evans, Gemma Carey, Andrew Todd, Chris Aylward & Enplan – Phil Russell-Vick Checking and Approvals Name Signature Title Date Version Kerry Quinton (Checker) <electronically checked> Principal Environmental 16.06.2017 P02 Scientist (GBV) Vicky Lutyens (Reviewer) <electronically reviewed> Chief Environmental Scientist 16.06.2017 P02 (GBV) Emma Booth (Approver) <electronically approved> Project Manager (GBV) 16.06.2017 P02 EIA Scoping Report | iii ---- This page has intentionally been left blank ---- EIA Scoping Report | iv Summary Purpose of -
Appendix B Operating Techiques.Pdf
ffi +hr*ffitr;ffi dS\ wAMlrABy::!:,^T:F:T"!!1"11,_try ffi effiy\t9 Training and Advisory Board ffi .1rr !s*L11tffi ffiX,P..J*L-lI*s 6.'.aJ' s iJ.% wa"u-i *l- g.fn | M".t? S J* cY,',S fo o# #;-o# ""i?' l"| r*r.('l lr-^:-a- A. -t1a1---1 - {*t*+4 d*sti Unit- Gertifi6ate!' rrvstv ,$,r*-t *1.F.r.,,, which forms-v! part *i"r [*I of a S,$ e-"rqtt Nationalllutrt'rlltt Vocationalu\r'l,Lll\rllLl QualificationYllgfff fft glff\rll .9*# ffn:ff* {* {4 r^, iW i{-..i^, {E _ {o; *.'S Units gained: *..* procedures Iti*,.]ft .91991199 Monitor to control risks to health and safety (Employment NTO Unit B) fJi,k a,n'i.H Y1013895 Control the reception of inert waste . i '\r= t';I13 H1013897 Control the movement, sorting and storage of inert waste tt,t;fliff 1,"*";1t* M1013899 Control site operations for thJdisposal oi inert waste lI.j'Y"; R1013894 Prepare tandfiil sites for the acceptance of waste f.f- f ll'Jniia'!1* .T.:-fI_-{ L'1013862: EilsutEEnsure PterEultuilprotection urof therne environmentenvtlorltTtenl on tanoliltlandfill sitesstlgs F ,*i"4- ,atl-E,w r^aioE'wj rf,r", .r^tiH1,,' r^a'{E &" t , aa.. -.r& "rr I I A,t-r -.rvt a,t {r-^" &l 4a.*5+r :^rSLr^, - mi--a,ttF {F ^,t"'/{ w:+-+^,dl ,t^f,r. {}' t^t F! ''r ' i$;;t'1"€ ThisI lllli \,erllllcareGertificate islri awardedawarqeq to[O Ul-fdi.$; n4l.tr-l {'}t'k LtdL i; i+{}i^;{r *r"%i, Williamuuililarrt Thomast ttotrras Morristutorrts " .c *tak * ,B w yrl,L* s'kr.+,i-iJI Awarded: rrc4tzoi2 serial No:r !v' rosagrsrrreuevrrr | *.e.f*t*"'* *l*I- e.sPe* wrrc.ii JTe*slry t<,;fud*i l'l iil,*i,<r--.>< ie i& ?Y.";st AuthorisedAuthorised_ F*sttt**.o#/ltlAQa*rsic 617 A !i,J'sJl e?,,ry- (-^-,t* [1"*i;-t** ChCn rbris Ray \ t,X fuJ6mesf#es Burberry ::i F,-. -
Airports Nps - Habitats Regulations Assessment Appendix B Appropriate Assessment of Short List Alternatives
AIRPORTS NPS - HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT APPENDIX B APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT OF SHORT LIST ALTERNATIVES JUNE 2018 AIRPORTS NPS - HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT APPENDIX B APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT OF SHORT LIST ALTERNATIVES Department for Transport Project no: 70030195 Date: June 2018 WSP The Forum Barnfield Road Exeter EX1 1QR Tel: (01392) 229700 www.wsp.com iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................ 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 1.2 HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT (HRA) SCREENING ................... 1 1.3 APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT (AA) ............................................................... 2 1.4 IN-COMBINATION EFFECTS ON NATURA 2000 AND RAMSAR SITES ....... 3 1.5 CONSULTATION ............................................................................................... 5 2 EFFECTS OF DISTURBANCE ..................................................... 6 2.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 6 2.2 RELEVANT EUROPEAN SITES ........................................................................ 6 2.3 APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT ........................................................................ 7 2.4 SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS ON INTEGRITY AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE SCHEMES ...................... 13 2.5 AVOIDANCE AND MITIGATION MEASURES ............................................... -
Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study: Final Report | January 2019 Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study Final Report
Elmbridge Borough Council Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study: Final Report | January 2019 Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study Final Report Ove Arup & Partners Ltd 13 Fitzroy Street, London, W1T 4BQ, United Kingdom www.arup.com Elmbridge Borough Council Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study: Final Report | January 2019 Document Verification Job title Landscape Sensitivity and Strategic Views Study Job number 263905-00 Document title Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study: Final Report File reference Document ref Revision Date Filename Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study-Final Report Final 30/01/19 Description Draft issue Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Christopher Wright Andrew Tempany Tom Armour Signature Revision Date Filename Description Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Signature This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 263905-00 Elmbridge Borough Council Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study: Final Report | January 2019 Contents Page 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Landscape Assessment Methodology 5 3.0 Landscape Sensitivity Study Summary Findings 17 4.0 Landscape Sensitivity Study Analysis and Recommendations 25 5.0 Appendices 177 Elmbridge Borough Council Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study: Final Report | January 2019 1.0 Introduction Scope and purpose of the Landscape What -
Hurst Road West Molesey Surrey KT8 1QS Telephone: 0208 979 1709
HURST PARK PRIMARY SCHOOL SCHOOL PROSPECTUS 2020/2021 Hurst Road West Molesey Surrey KT8 1QS Telephone: 0208 979 1709 Website address: www.hurst-park.surrey.sch.uk The details set out in this brochure relate to the school year indicated and are correct for that year as at September 2015. It should not be assumed that there will be no change affecting the relevant arrangements or some matter particularised before the start of, or during, the school year in question or in relation to subsequent school years. Contents Page Number Welcome to Hurst Park 3 The Staff 4 School Governors 5 What your child will learn 6 The National Curriculum 6, 7, 8 Relationships and Sex Education 8 Inclusion 9 Extra-Curricular Activities 9 Before and After School Care 9 The School Routine 10 School Meals 11 School Fund 11 Leaving school premises 11 Absences 11 Parent Partnership 12 Special Events 12 School Uniform & Jewellery 13 Equipment 13 Home-School Agreement 14 Policies 14 Visiting the school and contact with teachers 14 Concerns 15 Medicines 15 Term dates 15 Parent Teacher Association 16 The School’s Admission Policy 17 School Attendance 17 Pupil Attendance figures 18 Procedures for Parents and Carers if there is an 19 accident to a child before or after school Appendix 1: Safeguarding Children Statement 20 Appendix 2: Travel Plan 21 2 Welcome to Hurst Park Primary School Inspiring a community of successful learners Respect…Resilience…Positivity Dear Parent, Hurst Park School is a co-educational Surrey Community Primary School, which caters for children between the ages of 5 and 11. -
Annual Monitoring Report for Financial Year 2005/6
Local Development Framework UDP / LDF Annual Monitoring Report for financial year 2005/6 submitted December 2006 Based Upon Ordnance Survey data. © Crown copyright. All rights reserved 100019441 [2006]." If you need this document in Braille, large print, audio tape, or another language, please contact us on 020 8891 7322 or minicom 020 8831 6001 Albanian Arabic Bengali Farsi Gujarati Punjabi Urdu The Local Development Framework for the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames is prepared by the Policy Section of the Environment Directorate Policy Section Environment Directorate London Borough of Richmond upon Thames Civic Centre 44 York Street Twickenham Middlesex TW1 3BZ Telephone 020 8891 7322 Fax 020 8891 7768 Email [email protected] Website www.richmond.gov.uk UDP/ LDF Annual Monitoring Report 2005/6 London Borough of Richmond upon Thames Annual Monitoring Report for financial year2005/6 Published January 2007 Produced by Policy & Research Section. Contact [email protected] g:\data&research\AMR2006\AMR 2005-6 Final Report.doc 14/02/2007 14:01 UDP/ LDF Annual Monitoring Report 2005/6 Contents page 1. Introduction 1 2. Non-technical summary 3 3. Richmond upon Thames Profile 5 4. Progress with Unitary Development Plan & Local Development 11 Framework 5. Implementation of UDP policies & proposals 19 6. Open Environment 2 7. Conservation & Built Environment 26 8. Transport 29 9. Housing 36 10. Employment 42 11. Community Uses and Local Services 51 12. Town Centres & Access to Shopping 58 13. Sustainability Indicators 66 Appendices 1. Implementation of Proposal Sites 90 2. Key shops and services available in local centres 93 3. -
Site Assessment Report Site No
Strategic Flood Risk Assessment of the Surrey Minerals Plan Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Report Aggregates Recycling DPD (Submission Version) Appendix Two Review of the flood risks for the sites considered for inclusion in the Aggregates Recycling DPD August 2011 Review of the flood risks for the sites considered for Appendix 2: inclusion in the Aggregates Recycling DPD A2.1 Introduction The appendix provides a review of the extent of flood risk associated with the potential aggregate recycling sites that were considered as candidates for inclusion in the Aggregates Recycling DPD. The appendix provides a review of the potential aggregate recycling sites identified across the county on a borough and district basis, and outlines the most severe risks of fluvial flooding associated with each. The lists of potential aggregate recycling sites located within each district or borough are colour coded to give an indication of the severity of the flood risk associated with each. • Where the aggregate recycling site number is shaded dark blue this indicates that the site is subject in part or in whole to a 1.0% or greater annual risk of fluvial flooding (flood risk zone 3). • Where the aggregate recycling site number is shaded light blue this indicates that the site is subject in part or in whole to an annual risk of fluvial flooding of greater than 0.1% but less than 1.0% (flood risk Zone 2). • Where the aggregate recycling site number is shaded grey this indicates that the site is subject to an annual risk of fluvial flooding of less than 0.1% (flood risk zone 1).