DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix B Operating Techiques.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix B Operating Techiques.Pdf ffi +hr*ffitr;ffi dS\ wAMlrABy::!:,^T:F:T"!!1"11,_try ffi effiy\t9 Training and Advisory Board ffi .1rr !s*L11tffi ffiX,P..J*L-lI*s 6.'.aJ' s iJ.% wa"u-i *l- g.fn | M".t? S J* cY,',S fo o# #;-o# ""i?' l"| r*r.('l lr-^:-a- A. -t1a1---1 - {*t*+4 d*sti Unit- Gertifi6ate!' rrvstv ,$,r*-t *1.F.r.,,, which forms-v! part *i"r [*I of a S,$ e-"rqtt Nationalllutrt'rlltt Vocationalu\r'l,Lll\rllLl QualificationYllgfff fft glff\rll .9*# ffn:ff* {* {4 r^, iW i{-..i^, {E _ {o; *.'S Units gained: *..* procedures Iti*,.]ft .91991199 Monitor to control risks to health and safety (Employment NTO Unit B) fJi,k a,n'i.H Y1013895 Control the reception of inert waste . i '\r= t';I13 H1013897 Control the movement, sorting and storage of inert waste tt,t;fliff 1,"*";1t* M1013899 Control site operations for thJdisposal oi inert waste lI.j'Y"; R1013894 Prepare tandfiil sites for the acceptance of waste f.f- f ll'Jniia'!1* .T.:-fI_-{ L'1013862: EilsutEEnsure PterEultuilprotection urof therne environmentenvtlorltTtenl on tanoliltlandfill sitesstlgs F ,*i"4- ,atl-E,w r^aioE'wj rf,r", .r^tiH1,,' r^a'{E &" t , aa.. -.r& "rr I I A,t-r -.rvt a,t {r-^" &l 4a.*5+r :^rSLr^, - mi--a,ttF {F ^,t"'/{ w:+-+^,dl ,t^f,r. {}' t^t F! ''r ' i$;;t'1"€ ThisI lllli \,erllllcareGertificate islri awardedawarqeq to[O Ul-fdi.$; n4l.tr-l {'}t'k LtdL i; i+{}i^;{r *r"%i, Williamuuililarrt Thomast ttotrras Morristutorrts " .c *tak * ,B w yrl,L* s'kr.+,i-iJI Awarded: rrc4tzoi2 serial No:r !v' rosagrsrrreuevrrr | *.e.f*t*"'* *l*I- e.sPe* wrrc.ii JTe*slry t<,;fud*i l'l iil,*i,<r--.>< ie i& ?Y.";st AuthorisedAuthorised_ F*sttt**.o#/ltlAQa*rsic 617 A !i,J'sJl e?,,ry- (-^-,t* [1"*i;-t** ChCn rbris Ray \ t,X fuJ6mesf#es Burberry ::i F,-. t'.-,"e=1 Chief Executive Officer, WAMITAB Qualifications Manager, WAMITAB f;;t ;f r; r'rr t #..*I {Ii. $i i' *%i $F,*,% (:ffi:)6X$ ,m::efui;nffi***ffi{* ,*'m'1, ffi;r:-\-,^H7.,"/indicatenthatth"'i:'3*il"ilJiffigEioonlYforffio;'*,;: :qie:\cn-rg %%# tffi i:i."'; \'^t-,*9Y-17 ffi'ffi.W o."oil'," ri'"in FSffi, i*"ii ::ii_ 00a1?426- 5== *-t r,*==::ri -,- -.-: :: ' :J --.- ;"."r=.,,.j aG JC lt Jt {t a€ rC a& .aa ,G nG aE .4G r} ,L aa. .aa al .t} 4L aE aE. ra t[, {4. .{ts €. dt- {}. eo,r1 ***tao1,t},ot r*t q,*r r*'l-rgl r*+ r* *t"toot,rt,f f,%oo '*a.r*Lr.*r fu;'l '1*i1.ra4 r*",r*t"r1'f %-+1 "*v r*t "Ot 6r"r"o' Watersplash Farm Environmental Permit Application Operating Techniques September 2017 Prepared on behalf of CEMEX UK Materials Limited Quay West at MediaCityUK, Trafford Wharf Road, Trafford Park, Manchester M17 1HH Tel: +44 161 874 8714 Email: [email protected] Watersplash Farm - Operating Techniques Document control Document: Operating Techniques Project: Watersplash Farm Environment Permit Application Client: CEMEX UK Materials Limited Job Number: A104530 File Origin: \\southampton14\Data\Projects\Cemex UK Operations (C05081)\A104530 (Watersplash Farm Environment Permit Application)\Reports Revision: Final Date: 05/09/2017 Prepared by: Checked by: Approved By: Alice Shaw Andrew Bowker Andrew Bowker Description of revision: www.wyg.com creative minds safe hands Watersplash Farm - Operating Techniques Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Operating Procedures ........................................................................................................... 4 3.0 Regulated Facility Infrastructure ........................................................................................... 9 4.0 Accident Management .........................................................................................................12 5.0 Site Management ................................................................................................................14 6.0 Management of Documentation ...........................................................................................15 7.0 Incidents and Non-Conformances ........................................................................................16 Drawings CEM/A104530/LOC/01 – Site Location DESID 9 – Regional Geology DESID 11 – Local Hydrogeology and Hydrology P3/648/9 – Final Restoration Appendices Appendix A – Certificate of Technical Competence Appendix B – ISO 14001 Certificate www.wyg.com creative minds safe hands Watersplash Farm - Operating Techniques 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Report Context 1.1.1 This section of the Environmental Permit application corresponds to Section 3 of Part B4 of the Environmental Permit application forms and specifically details the operating and management procedures for the filling of void space using inert waste that will be in place at the site. 1.1.2 This Environmental Permit application has been prepared by WYG on behalf of the Operator, CEMEX UK Materials Limited (CEMEX). 1.2 Site Setting 1.2.1 Watersplash Farm (the site) is located approximately 1.2km north east from Shepperton in Surrey and is centred on approximate National Grid Reference (NGR) TQ 09303 67529. The application site is detailed on Drawing Number CEM/A104530/LOC/01. 1.2.2 The site is divided in two by the River Ash which enters the site at the north west under the Upper Halliford Bypass and runs in a south-east direction towards Fordbridge Road. The river then joins the River Thames which is located approximately 400m south at its closest point. 1.2.3 The western boundary is formed by the Gaston Bridge Road (A244), the south by the Fordbridge Road (B375) and the north east by Halliford Road. To the south of the site beyond Forbridge Road is a marina, fishing lake and swan sanctuary. 1.2.4 Residential properties are located to the west, north and south east of the site and the nearest residential property is a detached residential property know as Cuckoo Pound. The property is located along the northern boundary of the western half of the site. Commercial units are located to the south east of the eastern half of the site. 1.3 Geology 1.3.1 The geology of the site and its surrounding area are presented on Drawing Number DESID 9. The maps show that the site is underlain by substantial London Clay deposits, above the Lambeth Group. The Upper Chalk underlies the Tharnet Sand formation, which is stratigraphically separated from it by an unconformity. The site is located near the top of the London Clay and a large thickness (up to 111m) of London Clay can be interpreted to be present below the site. The London Clay is described as a brown to dark grey clay with fine- www.wyg.com creative minds safe hands 1 Watersplash Farm - Operating Techniques grained sands and pebble beds in places. 1.3.2 The younger Claygate Member (fine-grained silty and clayey sand) and Bagshot Formation (fine to medium grained sands with thinly laminated clays and silts in places) are found beneath the superficial deposits to the south and west. 1.3.3 The River Terrace Deposits below the site belong to the Shepperton Gravel Member (first terrace). The Kempton Park Gravels (second terrace), Taplow Gravels (third terrace) and the Langley Silt Member are also present close to the site as shown on Drawing Number DESID 9. 1.3.4 Alluvium (sand, silt and clay associated with the River Ash and River Thames) is also present adjacent to the rivers. 1.3.5 Further details regarding the geology of the site are provided in Environmental Setting and Site Design (ESSD) report (Appendix C of the main application). 1.4 Hydrogeology 1.4.1 With reference to the Environment Agency’s mapping website ‘What’s in my backyard’, the site is not situated within a Groundwater Source Protection Zone (GSPZ). 1.4.2 The Environment Agency’s aquifer maps show that the sand and gravel superficial deposits are classified as a Principal Aquifer which comprise layers of rock or drift deposits that have high intergranular and/or fracture permeability - meaning they usually provide a high level of water storage. 1.4.3 The London Clay bedrock is classified among the “unproductive strata”. These are defined as being generally unable to support abstractions greater than 10m3/d and unlikely to provide significant baseflow or wetland discharges. 1.4.4 The Chalk beneath the London Clay is also classified as a Principal Aquifer. 1.4.5 Further details regarding the hydrogeology of the site are provided in the ESSD report. 1.5 Hydrology 1.5.1 Local surface water features are shown on Drawing Number DESID 11. 1.5.2 The principal surface water feature in the area is the River Thames, which is located about 400 m to the south of the site and flows to the east towards Central London. www.wyg.com creative minds safe hands 2 Watersplash Farm - Operating Techniques 1.5.3 The River Ash, a tributary of the Thames, runs through the site from the north west towards the south east where it joins the River Thames about 400m from the site. 1.5.4 Groundwater level information shows that groundwater flows towards the River Thames, and is likely to provide baseflow to the River Thames and the River Ash. 1.5.5 The area between the site and the River Thames consists of a marina and fisheries which were developed in the lakes formed by historical mineral workings. The marina is fed by the River Thames. 1.5.6 A large number of other open water bodies are located in the wider area, also principally in historical sand and gravel workings. 1.5.7 The Queen Elizabeth II Storage Reservoir, Knight Reservoir, Molesey Reservoirs and Bessborough Reservoir are all located about 1.4km to the south east of the site and the Queen Mary Reservoir is located about 1.5km to the north west. These reservoirs are believed not to be connected to the sand and gravel aquifer.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Elmbridge Borough Council Green Belt Boundary Review Annex Report 2 - Local Area Assessment Pro-Formas
    Elmbridge Borough Council Green Belt Boundary Review Annex Report 2 - Local Area Assessment Pro-formas Issue Rev C | 14 March 2016 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 243074-00 Ove Arup & Partners Ltd 13 Fitzroy Street London W1T 4BQ United Kingdom www.arup.com Local Area 1 Area (ha) 453.1 Location Plan Strategic Area Strategic Area C lies on the fringes of a much wider area of strategic Green Belt which extends Summary across much of Surrey. Its strategic role in Elmbridge is to prevent the town of Oxshott / Cobham from merging with Ashtead and Leatherhead / Bookham / Fetcham in Mole Valley, though it is also important for preventing encroachment into open countryside. Much of the Area retains an unspoilt and open, rural character, though in some isolated localities ribbon development along roads and the loss of arable farmland to horse paddocks has diminished this character somewhat. At the strategic level, the Strategic Area plays an important role in meeting the fundamental aim of Green Belt policy to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open. Assessment of the Strategic Area against the relevant NPPF Purposes is as follows: - Purpose 1 – Meets the Purpose moderately by acting as an important barrier to potential sprawl from the Guildford urban area, Ash and Tongham urban area, Dorking, and Leatherhead / Bookham / Fetcham / Ashtead. - Purpose 2 – Meets the Purpose strongly by establishing important gaps between a number of Surrey towns from merging into one another.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Opportunity Areas: the Basis for Realising Surrey's Local
    Biodiversity Opportunity Areas: The basis for realising Surrey’s ecological network Surrey Nature Partnership September 2019 (revised) Investing in our County’s future Contents: 1. Background 1.1 Why Biodiversity Opportunity Areas? 1.2 What exactly is a Biodiversity Opportunity Area? 1.3 Biodiversity Opportunity Areas in the planning system 2. The BOA Policy Statements 3. Delivering Biodiversity 2020 - where & how will it happen? 3.1 Some case-studies 3.1.1 Floodplain grazing-marsh in the River Wey catchment 3.1.2 Calcareous grassland restoration at Priest Hill, Epsom 3.1.3 Surrey’s heathlands 3.1.4 Priority habitat creation in the Holmesdale Valley 3.1.5 Wetland creation at Molesey Reservoirs 3.2 Summary of possible delivery mechanisms 4. References Figure 1: Surrey Biodiversity Opportunity Areas Appendix 1: Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statement format Appendix 2: Potential Priority habitat restoration and creation projects across Surrey (working list) Appendices 3-9: Policy Statements (separate documents) 3. Thames Valley Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (TV01-05) 4. Thames Basin Heaths Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (TBH01-07) 5. Thames Basin Lowlands Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (TBL01-04) 6. North Downs Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (ND01-08) 7. Wealden Greensands Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (WG01-13) 8. Low Weald Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (LW01-07) 9. River Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (R01-06) Appendix 10: BOA Objectives & Targets Summary (separate document) Written by: Mike Waite Chair, Biodiversity Working Group Biodiversity Opportunity Areas: The basis for realising Surrey’s ecological network, Sept 2019 (revised) 2 1. Background 1.1 Why Biodiversity Opportunity Areas? The concept of Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (BOAs) has been in development in Surrey since 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Molesey Hospital Critical!
    ++++++ News from your Molesey Conservative councillors ++++++ MAGICAL MOLESEY Christmas wouldn’t be the same without Magical Molesey T to kick off the festivities. This year’s event is on Wednesday H December 2nd in Molesey town E centre, from 5pm-7pm, with Molesey News fun for all the family. Issue 19: Autumn 2015 Editor: Steve Bax | Email: [email protected] | Web: www.moleseyconservatives.com | Twitter: @MoleseySteve STEVE Molesey SAYS: Hospital Hello and welcome to the Autumn Molesey News. I am Councillor Steve Bax and I edit this newsletter on behalf of the Molesey Conservative critical! Residents political group. Local NHS considers I hope you had an enjoyable summer, even if it may feel plan to close hospital like a distant memory now. OLESEY'S 120-year-old Your Molesey Conservative coun- Molesey Conservative councillor, One highlight for me was community hospital could cillors met with retired doctor Ken Dr Peter Szanto, whose wife used to being asked to represent the Mbe closed under new pro- Brown, chairman of the Molesey work for the NHS, visited Molesey Mayor of Elmbridge in the posals by the local health authority. Hospital League of Friends to discuss Hospital on November 5th. annual Riparian Challenge, Surrey Downs Clinical Commis- options for saving the hospital. He was assured staff will not lose part of the Great River Race. sioning Group (CCG) has reviewed Ken said the report is very thorough their jobs if Molesey Hospital closes, That meant being a inpatient and outpatient services at and will be difficult to challenge, but and that the CCG recognises that passenger in a boat rowed the community hospitals in its area he noted that the Elmbridge Commu- lack of public between Molesey and by Peter, Russell and Bob of (Molesey, New Epsom and Ewell nity Medical Team - a pilot scheme Cobham is a major issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Watersplash Farm Environmental Permit Application Environmental
    Watersplash Farm Environmental Permit Application Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan September 2017 Prepared on behalf of CEMEX UK Materials Limited Quay West at Media City UK, Trafford Wharf Road, Trafford Park, Manchester M17 1HH Tel: +44 161 874 8714 Email: [email protected] Watersplash Farm – Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan Document control Document: Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan Project: Watersplash Farm Environment Permit Application Client: CEMEX UK Materials Limited Job Number: A104530 File Origin: \\southampton14\Data\Projects\Cemex UK Operations (C05081)\A104530 (Watersplash Farm Environment Permit Application)\Reports Revision: Final Date: 05/09/2017 Prepared by: Checked by: Approved By: Alice Shaw Andrew Bowker Andrew Bowker Description of revision: www.wyg.com creative minds safe hands Watersplash Farm – Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Groundwater Management and Monitoring ............................................................................ 2 3.0 Surface Water Management and Monitoring .......................................................................... 5 4.0 Landfill Gas Management and Monitoring .............................................................................. 9 5.0 Meteorological Monitoring ....................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • EIA Scoping Report
    View of Bell weir on the River Thames at Hythe End, from downstream of the Channel Section 1 outlet. River Thames Scheme - Capacity Improvements and Flood Channel Project Draft Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Report for Consultation June 2017 Published by: Environment Agency Horizon house, Deanery Road Bristol BS1 5AH Email: enquiries@environment- agency.gov.uk www.environment-agency.gov.uk © Environment Agency 2011 Further copies of this report are available from our publications catalogue: All rights reserved. This document may be http://publications.environment- reproduced with prior permission of agency.gov.uk or our National Customer the Environment Agency. Contact Centre: T: 03708 506506 Email: enquiries@environment- agency.gov.uk. ii Quality Assurance Project name River Thames Scheme Capacity Improvements and Flood Channel Project –EIA Scoping Report Project 1B1S reference ENV_IMSE500260_0184 Date 16 June 2017 Version number P02 Author GBV – Kerry Quinton, Vicky Lutyens, Jenny Marshall-Evans, Gemma Carey, Andrew Todd, Chris Aylward & Enplan – Phil Russell-Vick Checking and Approvals Name Signature Title Date Version Kerry Quinton (Checker) <electronically checked> Principal Environmental 16.06.2017 P02 Scientist (GBV) Vicky Lutyens (Reviewer) <electronically reviewed> Chief Environmental Scientist 16.06.2017 P02 (GBV) Emma Booth (Approver) <electronically approved> Project Manager (GBV) 16.06.2017 P02 EIA Scoping Report | iii ---- This page has intentionally been left blank ---- EIA Scoping Report | iv Summary Purpose of
    [Show full text]
  • Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study: Final Report | January 2019 Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study Final Report
    Elmbridge Borough Council Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study: Final Report | January 2019 Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study Final Report Ove Arup & Partners Ltd 13 Fitzroy Street, London, W1T 4BQ, United Kingdom www.arup.com Elmbridge Borough Council Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study: Final Report | January 2019 Document Verification Job title Landscape Sensitivity and Strategic Views Study Job number 263905-00 Document title Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study: Final Report File reference Document ref Revision Date Filename Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study-Final Report Final 30/01/19 Description Draft issue Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Christopher Wright Andrew Tempany Tom Armour Signature Revision Date Filename Description Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Signature This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 263905-00 Elmbridge Borough Council Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study: Final Report | January 2019 Contents Page 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Landscape Assessment Methodology 5 3.0 Landscape Sensitivity Study Summary Findings 17 4.0 Landscape Sensitivity Study Analysis and Recommendations 25 5.0 Appendices 177 Elmbridge Borough Council Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study: Final Report | January 2019 1.0 Introduction Scope and purpose of the Landscape What
    [Show full text]
  • Hurst Road West Molesey Surrey KT8 1QS Telephone: 0208 979 1709
    HURST PARK PRIMARY SCHOOL SCHOOL PROSPECTUS 2020/2021 Hurst Road West Molesey Surrey KT8 1QS Telephone: 0208 979 1709 Website address: www.hurst-park.surrey.sch.uk The details set out in this brochure relate to the school year indicated and are correct for that year as at September 2015. It should not be assumed that there will be no change affecting the relevant arrangements or some matter particularised before the start of, or during, the school year in question or in relation to subsequent school years. Contents Page Number Welcome to Hurst Park 3 The Staff 4 School Governors 5 What your child will learn 6 The National Curriculum 6, 7, 8 Relationships and Sex Education 8 Inclusion 9 Extra-Curricular Activities 9 Before and After School Care 9 The School Routine 10 School Meals 11 School Fund 11 Leaving school premises 11 Absences 11 Parent Partnership 12 Special Events 12 School Uniform & Jewellery 13 Equipment 13 Home-School Agreement 14 Policies 14 Visiting the school and contact with teachers 14 Concerns 15 Medicines 15 Term dates 15 Parent Teacher Association 16 The School’s Admission Policy 17 School Attendance 17 Pupil Attendance figures 18 Procedures for Parents and Carers if there is an 19 accident to a child before or after school Appendix 1: Safeguarding Children Statement 20 Appendix 2: Travel Plan 21 2 Welcome to Hurst Park Primary School Inspiring a community of successful learners Respect…Resilience…Positivity Dear Parent, Hurst Park School is a co-educational Surrey Community Primary School, which caters for children between the ages of 5 and 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Assessment Report Site No
    Strategic Flood Risk Assessment of the Surrey Minerals Plan Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Report Aggregates Recycling DPD (Submission Version) Appendix Two Review of the flood risks for the sites considered for inclusion in the Aggregates Recycling DPD August 2011 Review of the flood risks for the sites considered for Appendix 2: inclusion in the Aggregates Recycling DPD A2.1 Introduction The appendix provides a review of the extent of flood risk associated with the potential aggregate recycling sites that were considered as candidates for inclusion in the Aggregates Recycling DPD. The appendix provides a review of the potential aggregate recycling sites identified across the county on a borough and district basis, and outlines the most severe risks of fluvial flooding associated with each. The lists of potential aggregate recycling sites located within each district or borough are colour coded to give an indication of the severity of the flood risk associated with each. • Where the aggregate recycling site number is shaded dark blue this indicates that the site is subject in part or in whole to a 1.0% or greater annual risk of fluvial flooding (flood risk zone 3). • Where the aggregate recycling site number is shaded light blue this indicates that the site is subject in part or in whole to an annual risk of fluvial flooding of greater than 0.1% but less than 1.0% (flood risk Zone 2). • Where the aggregate recycling site number is shaded grey this indicates that the site is subject to an annual risk of fluvial flooding of less than 0.1% (flood risk zone 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Our Virtual Tour of Hurst Park Primary School. We Are a Two Form Entry
    Welcome to our virtual tour of Hurst Park Primary School. We are a two form entry primary school with a 40-place nursery situated in West Molesey, surrey, opposite the Molesey Reservoirs Nature Reserve. Life at Hurst Park is underpinned by our four key values: Excellence, resilience, positivity and respect. We expect all members of the school community to embrace these values both in school and beyond. Pupils are encouraged to take pride in everything they do. This starts with their uniform, which they wear from their first day in reception. We expect their work to be presented to the highest standard and reward pupils who embrace the school’s values in day to day life. We have a large, multipurpose hall, which is used for daily assemblies, Indoor PE lessons, school lunches and a range of other activities such as school clubs, PTA events and our range of concerts and performances. We have an active and supportive PTA, who organise a range of events such as fayres, quizzes, children’s parties, etc. to raise funds for the school and to give new parents an opportunity to meet and socialise. During their reception year, pupils attend a special sorting assembly, where they are placed into one of the school’s four houses named after historical figures associated with the Molesey area. House points are awarded for pupils’ achievements and celebrated in a weekly assembly where house point totals are revealed. At the end of each term, winning houses receive a special treat culminating in the presentation of the house shield at the end of the academic year.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Notes on Railways in the Molesey and Walton Area
    Some Notes on Railways in the Molesey and Walton Area By Greg Martin Introduction Many of us are likely to be surprised that temporary railways were once used in the Molesey area, as virtually no sign of them remains. Temporary railways were used across Surrey during construction of the Kingston Bypass, the Brooklands Motor Racing Track, the Guildford Bypass and the River Wey Improvement Scheme. However, the notes below concentrate on those industrial railways that once existed in Molesey and Walton. John Aird & Sons, Knight & Bessborough Reservoirs John Aird & Sons used two standard gauge steam locomotives when they constructed the Knight and Bessborough Reservoirs in Molesey for the Southwark & Vauxhall Water Company. The locomotives were both made by Manning Wardle & Co Ltd of Leeds. Work on the reservoirs commenced in April 1901 and finished in April 1907, the water company having become the Metropolitan Water Board during the construction period in June 1904. Thomas Docwra, Enlargement of Molesey Reservoirs Thomas Docwra used five standard gauge steam locomotives when enlarging existing reservoirs in Molesey. The enlargement work was carried out from May 1898 to April 1904. The locomotives were by Black Hawthorn (one acquired second-hand), Hudswell Clarke (one acquired second-hand) and Manning Wardle (one acquired second-hand and two new from the makers). One of the locos later moved to Brentford, where Thomas Docwra had a contract to construct the main road between Brentford and Osterley. Dick Kerr & Co, Walton Pumping Station Dick Kerr & Co Ltd constructed the Walton Pumping Station for the Metropolitan Water Board using an unidentified standard gauge steam locomotive.
    [Show full text]
  • The River Thames
    Landscape and Nature Conservation Designations along the River Thames, Hurst Park and Meadows Overview: The River Thames - forms the northern boundary of the Borough of Elmbridge, which is characterised by attractive, historic and natural environments, with distinctive local communities. The entire length of the Thames through Elmbridge has the designation of a Site of Nature Conservation Importance (including Duck’s Eyot and the riverbank margins). Habitat at the water’s edge and on the eyots supports nesting and resident mallard, diving ducks, mandarin ducks, pochard, grebe, moorhen, coot, swans, Egyptian geese, Canada geese; visiting heron, barnacle geese, cormorant, tern, black-headed gull, hobby, summer migrants and kingfisher. The vegetation that overhangs the river margins and the relative tranquillity of the Thames here is essential for these water birds to thrive. Hurst Meadows - a rare traditional Thames wild flower and grassland flood meadow, also an SNCI by virtue of its exceptionally rich and diverse habitat and its rare and unusual flora, which include autumn squill, great burnet, and bee orchid. In the course of a year it is possible to see butterflies, moths, crickets, pollinating insects and many others. In high summer the long grass and wild flowers are alive and buzzing. In autumn there are many species of fungus. Birds include starling and thrush, now on the red list, and the tawny owl. The area also supports seven or eight species of bats, which use the river for foraging and as a fly-way. Summer migrants and bats feed on insects over the parkland. On a warm twilight there are pipistrelles and summer migrants visible darting after insects.
    [Show full text]
  • Su M M Er Su R V Ey S
    Summer Sur v ey s Great crested newt, Bookham Common 26/7/16, DS My introduction to the article under the same title in the previous newsletter serves for this also: This summer Surrey Bat Group is taking part in two harp trapping surveys. The national Nathusius’ pipistrelle survey is continuing and a woodland bat survey is being carried out in some counties to try to find out more about the distribution of the Alcathoe bat, Myotis alcathoe. Last newsletter’s article took us up to the time when trapping stopped for the birthing period as it is important not to catch bats which are heavily pregnant or are suckling very young babies. Here I carry on from resumption of trapping towards the end of July. As before my reports below give a general view of the surveys so far rather than a complete record of results. Woodland Bat Survey One of the main focuses of this survey is the Alcathoe bat, Myotis alcathoe. It is one of three species along with whiskered bat, M mystacinus, and Brandt’s bat, M brandtii, which closely resemble each other collectively known by various terms including “small Myotis”, “whiskered group” or the increasingly used “WABs” (Whiskered/Alcathoe/Brandt’s). Any of these caught are retained in cloth bags for a time in the hope that droppings will be forthcoming. Cells from the gut wall adhere to them, from which DNA can be used to identify the species positively. At Bookham Common, 26 July, a remarkable selection of species was caught including noctule, serotine, brown long eared, Daubenton’s bat, Bechstein’s bat, common and soprano pipistrelles and two WABs.
    [Show full text]