DOCSLIB.ORG

Site Assessment Report Site No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Site Assessment Report Site No Strategic Flood Risk Assessment of the Surrey Minerals Plan Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Report Aggregates Recycling DPD (Submission Version) Appendix Two Review of the flood risks for the sites considered for inclusion in the Aggregates Recycling DPD August 2011 Review of the flood risks for the sites considered for Appendix 2: inclusion in the Aggregates Recycling DPD A2.1 Introduction The appendix provides a review of the extent of flood risk associated with the potential aggregate recycling sites that were considered as candidates for inclusion in the Aggregates Recycling DPD. The appendix provides a review of the potential aggregate recycling sites identified across the county on a borough and district basis, and outlines the most severe risks of fluvial flooding associated with each. The lists of potential aggregate recycling sites located within each district or borough are colour coded to give an indication of the severity of the flood risk associated with each. • Where the aggregate recycling site number is shaded dark blue this indicates that the site is subject in part or in whole to a 1.0% or greater annual risk of fluvial flooding (flood risk zone 3). • Where the aggregate recycling site number is shaded light blue this indicates that the site is subject in part or in whole to an annual risk of fluvial flooding of greater than 0.1% but less than 1.0% (flood risk Zone 2). • Where the aggregate recycling site number is shaded grey this indicates that the site is subject to an annual risk of fluvial flooding of less than 0.1% (flood risk zone 1). Of the 84 potential aggregate recycling sites identified over the course of the preparation of the Aggregates Recycling DPD only a small number have been taken forward in the DPD. Planning Policy Statement 25 (Planning & Flood Risk) requires that local planning authorities apply a sequential approach to the allocation of land for development, to ensure that areas at little or no risk of flooding are developed in preference to sites that would be subject to greater risks. A2.2 Elmbridge Borough Council Five potential sites for aggregate recycling facilities were identified within the borough of Elmbridge during the preparation of the Aggregates Recycling DPD. Of the five sites identified, four are located in areas subject to 1 in 100 year return period (Zone 3) or 1 in 1,000 year (Zone 2) fluvial flood risk, and none have been included in the submission version of the DPD. Reason for exclusion: No potential for development as an aggregate recycling AR7 Molesey Reservoirs, Molesey facility on grounds that such development would interfere adversely with the timing of the restoration of the existing mineral working (due for completion in Feb 2013). Reason for exclusion: No potential for development as an aggregate recycling Field Common North, Walton on AR12 facility on grounds that such development would interfere adversely with the timing Thames of the restoration of the existing mineral working (due for completion in Dec 2010). Reason for exclusion: No potential as an existing permanent recycling facility is AR42 Wintersells Road, Byfleet located on the site. Reason for exclusion: No potential as an existing permanent recycling facility is AR54 Weylands, Walton on Thames located on the site. Reason for exclusion: No potential on grounds of effects on neighbouring land AR83 Old Pit Lane, Byfleet uses. A2.3 Epsom & Ewell Borough Council Three potential sites for aggregate recycling facilities were identified within the borough of Epsom & Ewell during the preparation of the Aggregates Recycling DPD. All three sites identified are located in areas subject to a less than 1 in 1,000 year (Zone 1) fluvial flood risk, and none have been included in the submission version of the DPD. Aggregates Recycling DPD Strategic Flood Risk Assessment: Appendix 2 – August 2011 2 Reason for exclusion: No potential on grounds of the size of the site & access AR41 Epsom Chalk Pit, Epsom Downs issues. AR63 Longmead Industrial Estate, Ewell Reason for exclusion: No potential on grounds that insufficient land is available. Reason for exclusion: No potential on grounds that there is no space for a recycling AR84 Nonsuch Industrial Estate, Ewell site on the industrial estate. A2.4 Guildford Borough Council Fifteen potential sites for aggregate recycling facilities were identified within the borough of Guildford during the preparation of the Aggregates Recycling DPD. Of the fifteen sites identified, one is located in an area subject to 1 in 1,000 year return period (Zone 2) fluvial flood risk. The one site that has been included in the submission version of the DPD, at the former Wisley airfield, is located in an area of very low (Zone 1) fluvial flood risk. Reason for exclusion: No potential on grounds of access issues & proximity to the AR16 Woodhill Sandpit, Shamley Green waste stream. West Clandon Chalk Pit, West Reason for exclusion: No potential on grounds of access issues, the size of the site AR18 Clandon & the effect on amenity. Reason for exclusion: No potential as an existing temporary recycling facility is AR29 Merrow Highway Depot, Guildford located on the site. Reason for exclusion: No potential on grounds of proximity to the river, effects on AR36 Guildford (Slyfield) STW, Guildford amenity & proximity to an existing waste facility. Reason for exclusion: No potential as an existing permanent facility for soil AR44 Strawberry Farm, Flexford recycling is located on the site Reason for exclusion: No potential as an existing permanent materials recovery AR46 Westfield Road (Slyfield), Guildford facility, existing civic amenity site, & existing waste transfer station are located on the site. Reason for exclusion: No potential on grounds that there is no room for expansion AR48 Station Road, Ash Vale of the existing facility. Sunnyside, Wood Street Village, Reason for exclusion: No potential as an existing permanent recycling facility for AR55 Guildford agricultural & horticultural commodities is located on the site. Reason for exclusion: No potential on grounds of the size of the site & its proximity AR60 Slyfield Refuse Site, Guildford to an established major inert waste recycling facility. Reason for exclusion: The site is a former waste facility that ceased operating a Dalmead, Littlefield Common, number of years ago, there has been no interest shown in recommencing waste AR62 Guildford activity & it is unlikely that the site will come forward. Consequently there was considered to be no potential for intensification/expansion Reason for exclusion: No potential on grounds of land stability concerns & AR64 Slyfield Industrial Estate, Guildford proximity to other uses. AR65 Wisley Airfield, Wisley Site included in the Aggregates Recycling DPD Reason for exclusion: No potential on grounds of the site being occupied by an AR85 Guildford Railway Station, Guildford existing use (a car park) & issues with access Reason for exclusion: No potential on grounds of the site being occupied by AR86 Merrow Business Centre, Guildford existing uses (offices & highway depot) & its proximity to neighbouring residential development. Reason for exclusion: No potential on grounds of the site being occupied by AR87 Surrey Research Park, Guildford existing uses (offices) & issues with accessibility. A2.5 Mole Valley District Council Nine potential sites for aggregate recycling facilities were identified within the district of Mole Valley during the preparation of the Aggregates Recycling DPD. Reason for exclusion: No potential for further development as an existing AR3 Reigate Road, Betchworth permanent recycling facility is located on the site. Aggregates Recycling DPD Strategic Flood Risk Assessment: Appendix 2 – August 2011 3 Leatherhead Highway Depot, AR30 Reason for exclusion: No potential on grounds of the size of the site. Leatherhead Leatherhead Sewage Treatment Reason for exclusion: No potential on grounds of noise impacts, flood risk & effects AR37 Works, Leatherhead on amenity. Reason for exclusion: The site is an existing permanent aggregate recycling Plough Lane Industrial Estate, AR49 facility, it is anticipated that operations will continue at the site for the foreseeable Leatherhead future but there was considered to be no potential for intensification/ expansion. Reason for exclusion: Allocated for a waste use under policy WD2 of the Surrey Waste Plan, but considered to have limited potential for development of an AR61 Randalls Road, Leatherhead aggregate recycling facility. The site has been excluded from the Aggregates Recycling DPD on land availability & stability grounds. Reason for exclusion: No potential on grounds that the site is already occupied by AR68 Clockhouse Brickworks, Capel an active brickworks & proximity to the waste stream issues. Reason for exclusion: No potential on grounds of the size of the site, potential AR69 Land at Curtis Road, Dorking impact on the AONB, & effects on adjoining uses. Reason for exclusion: No potential on grounds of a lack of space at the site, access AR89 Land at Vincent Lane, Dorking issues, effects on amenity & the proximity of adjoining uses. Barnett Wood Lane Industrial Area, Reason for exclusion: No potential on grounds of the site being occupied by an AR90 Leatherhead existing use & being in close proximity to an existing recycling facility. Of the nine potential aggregate recycling sites identified three are located in areas subject to 1 in 100 year return period (Zone 3) or 1 in 1,000 year (Zone 2) fluvial flood risk, and none have been included in the submission version of the DPD. A2.6 Reigate & Banstead Borough Council Twelve potential sites for aggregate recycling facilities were identified within the borough of Reigate & Banstead during the preparation of the Aggregates Recycling DPD. Of the twelve sites identified, three are located in areas subject to 1 in 100 year return period (Zone 3) or 1 in 1,000 year (Zone 2) fluvial flood risk. The two sites that have been included in the submission version of the DPD, Copyhold Works (AR71) and the rail aggregate depot at Salfords (AR73), are located in areas of very low (Zone 1) fluvial flood risk.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Farnham Neighbourhood Plan Review Sustainability Appraisal
    Farnham Neighbourhood Plan Review (Regulation 15) Sustainability Appraisal/ Strategic Environmental Assessment Farnham Town Council December 2018 1 Contents Section 1 Introduction 3 Section 2: Key Sustainability Issues 10 Section 3: Sustainability Objectives 13 Section 4: Testing the Neighbourhood Plan Review Objectives 14 Section 5: Sustainability Appraisal of Development Options 19 Section 6: Sustainability Appraisal of Neighbourhood Plan Review Policies 29 Section 7: Conclusions 32 Appendix 1: Topic-based assessment of Farnham Baseline situation and Key 34 Issues Appendix 2: Sustainability Appraisal/ Strategic Environmental Assessment of 73 Policies Appendix 3: Sustainability Appraisal/ Strategic Environmental Assessment of 171 submitted housing sites not included in the Regulation 15 Neighbourhood Plan Review 2 Section 1 Introdiction What is Sustainability Appraisal/Strategic Environmental Appraisal? To help ensure that the Farnham Neighbourhood Plan Review is sustainable, it is best practice in the UK to undertake a Sustainability Appraisal (SA). An SA is a process that aims to predict and then assess the economic, environmental and social effects likely to arise from the adoption of the Neighbourhood Plan Review. Where a neighbourhood plan could have significant environmental effects, it may fall within the scope of the Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004 and so require a strategic environmental assessment (SEA). In April 2016, Waverley Borough Council issued a screening opinion that an SEA was required to be undertaken for the Farnham Neighbourhood Plan. As the Neighbourhood Plan Review provides for additional housing development to that included in the adopted Neighbourhood Plan, an SEA has been prepared for the Regulation 15 Review. One of the basic conditions that will be tested by the independent examiner of a Neighbourhood Plan is whether the making of the plan is compatible with European Union obligations (including under the Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive).
    [Show full text]
  • Surrey Future Congestion Programme 2014
    Congestion Programme 2014 i Foreword Surrey is renowned for its strong economy and high quality environment of open countryside and historic market towns. It is a great place in which to live, work and do business. However, congestion and past lack of investment in transport infrastructure are having a negative impact on Surrey’s economic competitiveness. Managing congestion on Surrey’s roads – which are some of the busiest in the country - is urgently needed to improve traffic flow and to avoid wasting time in traffic jams and losing business through delayed journeys. Surrey Future, which brings together local authorities and businesses to agree strategic infrastructure priorities for Surrey, have developed this Congestion Programme to help ensure Surrey’s economy remains strong and that planned growth set out in local plans is managed in a sustainable way. Building on the Surrey Transport Plan Congestion Strategy (2011), it sets out a strategic programme for tackling Surrey’s road congestion problems. We consulted with a wide range of residents, businesses and organisations during 2013 on a draft version of this Congestion Programme, and a number of changes have been made to this final version as a result of the comments we received. Those who responded broadly supported the aims and approach of the programme and we will work together with businesses, Local Enterprise Partnerships, new Local Transport Bodies and Government to help deliver our programme. We would like to thank all those who responded and contributed to making this programme as relevant and up-to-date as possible. Local Transport Strategies are now being developed for each district and borough and there will be consultations on these during 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Fourteenth Report of Session 2006–07
    House of Lords House of Commons Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments Fourteenth Report of Session 2006–07 Ordered by The House of Lords to be printed 28 March 2007 Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 28 March 2007 HL Paper 86 HC 82-xiv Published on 3 April 2007 by authority of the House of Lords and the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments Current membership House of Lords House of Commons Earl Attlee (Conservative) David Maclean MP (Conservative, Penrith and The Border) Lord Dykes (Liberal Democrat) (Chairman) Baroness Gale (Labour) Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods MP (Labour, City of Durham) Lord Gould of Brookwood (Labour) Mr Peter Bone MP (Conservative, Wellingborough) Lord Kimball (Conservative) Michael Jabez Foster MP (Labour, Hastings and Rye) Countess of Mar (Crossbench) Mr David Kidney MP (Labour, Stafford) Lord Walpole (Crossbench) Mr John MacDougall MP (Labour, Central Fife) David Simpson MP (Democratic Unionist, Upper Bann) Powers The full constitution and powers of the Committee are set out in House of Commons Standing Order No. 151 and House of Lords Standing Order No. 74, available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk/jcsi. Remit The Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments (JCSI) is appointed to consider statutory instruments made in exercise of powers granted by Act of Parliament. Instruments not laid before Parliament are included within the Committee's remit; but local instruments and instruments made by devolved administrations are not considered by JCSI unless they are required to be laid before Parliament. The role of the JCSI, whose membership is drawn from both Houses of Parliament, is to assess the technical qualities of each instrument that falls within its remit and to decide whether to draw the special attention of each House to any instrument on one or more of the following grounds: i.
    [Show full text]
  • Elmbridge Borough Council Green Belt Boundary Review Annex Report 2 - Local Area Assessment Pro-Formas
    Elmbridge Borough Council Green Belt Boundary Review Annex Report 2 - Local Area Assessment Pro-formas Issue Rev C | 14 March 2016 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 243074-00 Ove Arup & Partners Ltd 13 Fitzroy Street London W1T 4BQ United Kingdom www.arup.com Local Area 1 Area (ha) 453.1 Location Plan Strategic Area Strategic Area C lies on the fringes of a much wider area of strategic Green Belt which extends Summary across much of Surrey. Its strategic role in Elmbridge is to prevent the town of Oxshott / Cobham from merging with Ashtead and Leatherhead / Bookham / Fetcham in Mole Valley, though it is also important for preventing encroachment into open countryside. Much of the Area retains an unspoilt and open, rural character, though in some isolated localities ribbon development along roads and the loss of arable farmland to horse paddocks has diminished this character somewhat. At the strategic level, the Strategic Area plays an important role in meeting the fundamental aim of Green Belt policy to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open. Assessment of the Strategic Area against the relevant NPPF Purposes is as follows: - Purpose 1 – Meets the Purpose moderately by acting as an important barrier to potential sprawl from the Guildford urban area, Ash and Tongham urban area, Dorking, and Leatherhead / Bookham / Fetcham / Ashtead. - Purpose 2 – Meets the Purpose strongly by establishing important gaps between a number of Surrey towns from merging into one another.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Opportunity Areas: the Basis for Realising Surrey's Local
    Biodiversity Opportunity Areas: The basis for realising Surrey’s ecological network Surrey Nature Partnership September 2019 (revised) Investing in our County’s future Contents: 1. Background 1.1 Why Biodiversity Opportunity Areas? 1.2 What exactly is a Biodiversity Opportunity Area? 1.3 Biodiversity Opportunity Areas in the planning system 2. The BOA Policy Statements 3. Delivering Biodiversity 2020 - where & how will it happen? 3.1 Some case-studies 3.1.1 Floodplain grazing-marsh in the River Wey catchment 3.1.2 Calcareous grassland restoration at Priest Hill, Epsom 3.1.3 Surrey’s heathlands 3.1.4 Priority habitat creation in the Holmesdale Valley 3.1.5 Wetland creation at Molesey Reservoirs 3.2 Summary of possible delivery mechanisms 4. References Figure 1: Surrey Biodiversity Opportunity Areas Appendix 1: Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statement format Appendix 2: Potential Priority habitat restoration and creation projects across Surrey (working list) Appendices 3-9: Policy Statements (separate documents) 3. Thames Valley Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (TV01-05) 4. Thames Basin Heaths Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (TBH01-07) 5. Thames Basin Lowlands Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (TBL01-04) 6. North Downs Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (ND01-08) 7. Wealden Greensands Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (WG01-13) 8. Low Weald Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (LW01-07) 9. River Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (R01-06) Appendix 10: BOA Objectives & Targets Summary (separate document) Written by: Mike Waite Chair, Biodiversity Working Group Biodiversity Opportunity Areas: The basis for realising Surrey’s ecological network, Sept 2019 (revised) 2 1. Background 1.1 Why Biodiversity Opportunity Areas? The concept of Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (BOAs) has been in development in Surrey since 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Molesey Hospital Critical!
    ++++++ News from your Molesey Conservative councillors ++++++ MAGICAL MOLESEY Christmas wouldn’t be the same without Magical Molesey T to kick off the festivities. This year’s event is on Wednesday H December 2nd in Molesey town E centre, from 5pm-7pm, with Molesey News fun for all the family. Issue 19: Autumn 2015 Editor: Steve Bax | Email: [email protected] | Web: www.moleseyconservatives.com | Twitter: @MoleseySteve STEVE Molesey SAYS: Hospital Hello and welcome to the Autumn Molesey News. I am Councillor Steve Bax and I edit this newsletter on behalf of the Molesey Conservative critical! Residents political group. Local NHS considers I hope you had an enjoyable summer, even if it may feel plan to close hospital like a distant memory now. OLESEY'S 120-year-old Your Molesey Conservative coun- Molesey Conservative councillor, One highlight for me was community hospital could cillors met with retired doctor Ken Dr Peter Szanto, whose wife used to being asked to represent the Mbe closed under new pro- Brown, chairman of the Molesey work for the NHS, visited Molesey Mayor of Elmbridge in the posals by the local health authority. Hospital League of Friends to discuss Hospital on November 5th. annual Riparian Challenge, Surrey Downs Clinical Commis- options for saving the hospital. He was assured staff will not lose part of the Great River Race. sioning Group (CCG) has reviewed Ken said the report is very thorough their jobs if Molesey Hospital closes, That meant being a inpatient and outpatient services at and will be difficult to challenge, but and that the CCG recognises that passenger in a boat rowed the community hospitals in its area he noted that the Elmbridge Commu- lack of public between Molesey and by Peter, Russell and Bob of (Molesey, New Epsom and Ewell nity Medical Team - a pilot scheme Cobham is a major issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Bourne Club History – June 2019
    • History History 1920s The Club was built on the site of Bourne Lodge, Farnham, on land purchased from Colonel Phillips in the early 1920s at a cost of £433. Funds for building courts and premises were raised by debentures issued in the amount of £2,500. The first Committee meeting was held on 7th January 1923. Members of the Committee were duly elected, with Sir Stanley Bois becoming the first President, Major Lonsdale the Hon. Secretary and Mr Brierley the Hon. Treasurer. It was unanimously resolved that the Club be called The Bourne Club, and a total of 160 members were recorded. Original 1st Debenture Issued During 1923 it was agreed that four asphalt Tennis courts be constructed, as well as a hall for Badminton, a card room for Bridge, a small tearoom, dressing room facilities and a croquet lawn. 1924 A small office (in the form of a shed) was erected for the Hon. Secretary, near the (currently unused) soft drinks vending machine site. The original front door to the Club was located by the veranda and is now the entrance to the main changing rooms and gym. An account was opened at Lloyds Bank, Farnham. Badminton was played extensively with matches arranged against other clubs in the area. 1925 The first Tennis tournament was held. 1927 It was agreed that since the existing asphalt was not a popular surface, two of the Tennis courts would be converted to “Fernden” courts. These courts required more maintenance, and so the services of a Steward were engaged for this purpose as well as for general Club upkeep.
    [Show full text]
  • Watersplash Farm Environmental Permit Application Environmental
    Watersplash Farm Environmental Permit Application Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan September 2017 Prepared on behalf of CEMEX UK Materials Limited Quay West at Media City UK, Trafford Wharf Road, Trafford Park, Manchester M17 1HH Tel: +44 161 874 8714 Email: [email protected] Watersplash Farm – Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan Document control Document: Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan Project: Watersplash Farm Environment Permit Application Client: CEMEX UK Materials Limited Job Number: A104530 File Origin: \\southampton14\Data\Projects\Cemex UK Operations (C05081)\A104530 (Watersplash Farm Environment Permit Application)\Reports Revision: Final Date: 05/09/2017 Prepared by: Checked by: Approved By: Alice Shaw Andrew Bowker Andrew Bowker Description of revision: www.wyg.com creative minds safe hands Watersplash Farm – Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Groundwater Management and Monitoring ............................................................................ 2 3.0 Surface Water Management and Monitoring .......................................................................... 5 4.0 Landfill Gas Management and Monitoring .............................................................................. 9 5.0 Meteorological Monitoring ....................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Executive, 10/07/2018 18:45
    Waverley Borough Council Council Offices, The Burys, Godalming, Surrey GU7 1HR www.waverley.gov.uk To: All Members of the EXECUTIVE When calling please ask for: Fiona Cameron, Democratic Services Manager Policy and Governance E-mail: [email protected] Direct line: 01483 523226 Calls may be recorded for training or monitoring Date: 29 June 2018 Membership of the Executive Cllr Julia Potts (Chairman) Cllr Jenny Else Cllr Ged Hall (Vice Chairman) Cllr Carole King Cllr Andrew Bolton Cllr Tom Martin Cllr Kevin Deanus Cllr Chris Storey Cllr Jim Edwards Dear Councillors A meeting of the EXECUTIVE will be held as follows: DATE: TUESDAY, 10 JULY 2018 TIME: 6.45 PM PLACE: COUNCIL CHAMBER, COUNCIL OFFICES, THE BURYS, GODALMING The Agenda for the Meeting is set out below. Yours sincerely ROBIN TAYLOR Head of Policy and Governance Agendas are available to download from Waverley’s website (www.waverley.gov.uk/committees), where you can also subscribe to updates to receive information via email regarding arrangements for particular committee meetings. Alternatively, agendas may be downloaded to a mobile device via the free Modern.Gov app, available for iPad, Android, Windows and Kindle Fire. Page 1 Most of our publications can be provided in alternative formats. For an audio version, large print, text only or a translated copy of this publication, please contact [email protected] or call 01483 523351. This meeting will be webcast and can be viewed by visiting www.waverley.gov.uk/committees NOTES FOR MEMBERS Contact Officers are shown at the end of each report and members are welcome to raise questions, make observations etc.
    [Show full text]
  • EIA Scoping Report
    View of Bell weir on the River Thames at Hythe End, from downstream of the Channel Section 1 outlet. River Thames Scheme - Capacity Improvements and Flood Channel Project Draft Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Report for Consultation June 2017 Published by: Environment Agency Horizon house, Deanery Road Bristol BS1 5AH Email: enquiries@environment- agency.gov.uk www.environment-agency.gov.uk © Environment Agency 2011 Further copies of this report are available from our publications catalogue: All rights reserved. This document may be http://publications.environment- reproduced with prior permission of agency.gov.uk or our National Customer the Environment Agency. Contact Centre: T: 03708 506506 Email: enquiries@environment- agency.gov.uk. ii Quality Assurance Project name River Thames Scheme Capacity Improvements and Flood Channel Project –EIA Scoping Report Project 1B1S reference ENV_IMSE500260_0184 Date 16 June 2017 Version number P02 Author GBV – Kerry Quinton, Vicky Lutyens, Jenny Marshall-Evans, Gemma Carey, Andrew Todd, Chris Aylward & Enplan – Phil Russell-Vick Checking and Approvals Name Signature Title Date Version Kerry Quinton (Checker) <electronically checked> Principal Environmental 16.06.2017 P02 Scientist (GBV) Vicky Lutyens (Reviewer) <electronically reviewed> Chief Environmental Scientist 16.06.2017 P02 (GBV) Emma Booth (Approver) <electronically approved> Project Manager (GBV) 16.06.2017 P02 EIA Scoping Report | iii ---- This page has intentionally been left blank ---- EIA Scoping Report | iv Summary Purpose of
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B Operating Techiques.Pdf
    ffi +hr*ffitr;ffi dS\ wAMlrABy::!:,^T:F:T"!!1"11,_try ffi effiy\t9 Training and Advisory Board ffi .1rr !s*L11tffi ffiX,P..J*L-lI*s 6.'.aJ' s iJ.% wa"u-i *l- g.fn | M".t? S J* cY,',S fo o# #;-o# ""i?' l"| r*r.('l lr-^:-a- A. -t1a1---1 - {*t*+4 d*sti Unit- Gertifi6ate!' rrvstv ,$,r*-t *1.F.r.,,, which forms-v! part *i"r [*I of a S,$ e-"rqtt Nationalllutrt'rlltt Vocationalu\r'l,Lll\rllLl QualificationYllgfff fft glff\rll .9*# ffn:ff* {* {4 r^, iW i{-..i^, {E _ {o; *.'S Units gained: *..* procedures Iti*,.]ft .91991199 Monitor to control risks to health and safety (Employment NTO Unit B) fJi,k a,n'i.H Y1013895 Control the reception of inert waste . i '\r= t';I13 H1013897 Control the movement, sorting and storage of inert waste tt,t;fliff 1,"*";1t* M1013899 Control site operations for thJdisposal oi inert waste lI.j'Y"; R1013894 Prepare tandfiil sites for the acceptance of waste f.f- f ll'Jniia'!1* .T.:-fI_-{ L'1013862: EilsutEEnsure PterEultuilprotection urof therne environmentenvtlorltTtenl on tanoliltlandfill sitesstlgs F ,*i"4- ,atl-E,w r^aioE'wj rf,r", .r^tiH1,,' r^a'{E &" t , aa.. -.r& "rr I I A,t-r -.rvt a,t {r-^" &l 4a.*5+r :^rSLr^, - mi--a,ttF {F ^,t"'/{ w:+-+^,dl ,t^f,r. {}' t^t F! ''r ' i$;;t'1"€ ThisI lllli \,erllllcareGertificate islri awardedawarqeq to[O Ul-fdi.$; n4l.tr-l {'}t'k LtdL i; i+{}i^;{r *r"%i, Williamuuililarrt Thomast ttotrras Morristutorrts " .c *tak * ,B w yrl,L* s'kr.+,i-iJI Awarded: rrc4tzoi2 serial No:r !v' rosagrsrrreuevrrr | *.e.f*t*"'* *l*I- e.sPe* wrrc.ii JTe*slry t<,;fud*i l'l iil,*i,<r--.>< ie i& ?Y.";st AuthorisedAuthorised_ F*sttt**.o#/ltlAQa*rsic 617 A !i,J'sJl e?,,ry- (-^-,t* [1"*i;-t** ChCn rbris Ray \ t,X fuJ6mesf#es Burberry ::i F,-.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions Designation (No
    Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2020 No. 946 ROAD TRAFFIC, ENGLAND The Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions Designation (No. 2) Order 2020 Made - - - - 2nd September 2020 Laid before Parliament 8th September 2020 Coming into force - - 29th September 2020 This Order is made in exercise of the powers conferred by paragraph 8(1) of Part 2 of Schedule 8 and paragraph 3(1) of Schedule 10 to the Traffic Management Act 2004(1). Hampshire County Council, East Sussex County Council, the Council of the City of Stoke-on-Trent and Surrey County Council have each applied to the Secretary of State for an order to be made in exercise of those powers, in respect of part of its respective area. The Secretary of State has consulted the Chief Constables of the Hampshire, East Sussex, Staffordshire and Surrey Police, in accordance with the requirements of paragraph 8(3) of Part 2 of Schedule 8 and paragraph 3(4) of Schedule 10 to that Act. Accordingly, the Secretary of State(2) makes this Order. Citation and commencement 1. This Order may be cited as the Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions Designation (No. 2) Order 2020 and comes into force on 29th September 2020. Interpretation 2. In this Order— “grid reference” means Ordnance Survey National Grid reference point; and “strategic road network” means the highways for which Highways England Company Limited(3) is the highway authority by virtue of the Appointment of a Strategic Highways Company Order 2015(4).
    [Show full text]