Read the Full PDF

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Read the Full PDF Job Name:2084432 Date:14-12-11 PDF Page:2084432pbc.p1.pdf Color: Cyan Magenta Yellow Black THE AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH, established in 1943, is a publicly supported, nonpartisan research and educa­ tional organization. Its purpose is to assist policy makers, scholars, businessmen, the press and the public by providing objective analysis of national and inter­ national issues. Views expressed in the institute's publications are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff, advisory panels, officers or trustees of AEI. Institute publications take three major forms: 1. Legislative Analyses-balanced analyses of current proposals before the Congress, prepared with the help of specialists from the academic world and the fields of law and government. 2. Studies-in-depth studies and monographs about government programs and major national and international problems, written by independent scholars. 3. Rational Debates, Meetings, and Symposia-proceedings of debates, dis­ cussions, and conferences where eminent authorities with contrasting views discuss controversial issues. ADVISORY BOARD Paul W. McCracken, Chairman, Edmund Ezra Day University Professor of Business Administration, University of Michigan R. H. Coase, Professor of Economics, University of Chicago Milton Friedman, Paul S. Russell Distinguished Service Professor of Economics, University of Chicago Gottfried Haberler, Resident Scholar, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research C. Lowell Harriss, Professor of Economics, Columbia University George Lenczowski, Professor of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley Robert A. Nisbet, Albert Schweitzer Professor of the Humanities, Columbia University James A. Robinson, President, University of West Florida EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Herman J. Schmidt, Chairman of the Richard J. Farrell Board Dean P. Fite William J. Baroody, President Richard B. Madden William G. McClintock, Treasurer SENIOR STAFF Anne Brunsdale, Director of Edward J. Mitchell, Director, National Publications Energy Project Joseph G. Butts, Director of Legislative W. S. Moore, Director of Legal· Policy Analysis Studies Robert B. Helms, Director of Health Robert J. Pranger, Director of Foreign Policy Studies and Defense Policy Studies Thomas F. Johnson, Director of Louis M. Thompson, Jr., Assistant to Research the President for Communication Gary L. Jones, Assistant to the David G. Tuerck, Director, Center for President for Administration Research on Advertising Richard M. Lee, Director of Planning and Development ON NEGOTIATING WITH CUBA ON NEGOTIATING WITH CUBA Roger W. Fontaine American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research Washington, D. C. Distributed to the Trade by National Book Network, 15200 NBN Way, Blue Ridge Summit, PA 17214. To order call toll free 1-800-462-6420 or 1-717-794-3800. For all other inquiries please contact the AEI Press, 1150 Seventeenth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 or call 1-800-862-5801. RogerW. Fontaine is directorof Latin American Studies atthe Center for Strategic and International Studies at Georgetown University. ISBN 0-8447-3191-9 Foreign Affairs Study 28, December 1975 Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 75-39898 © 1975 by American Enterprise Institute -for Public Policy Research, Washington, D. C. Permission to quote from or to reproduce materials in this publicaton is granted when due acknowledgment is made. Printed in the United States of America CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 CUBA AND THE UNITED STATES: FROM THE BEGINNINGS TO 1959 3 Cuba's Past 4 The United States and Cuba 12 3 FIDEL CASTRO AND THE UNITED STATES: THE SMALL POWER FACES THE SUPERPOWER 27 Small Power versus Superpower 27 Castro and the United States. 32 American Policy toward Cuba 41 4 THE NEW WILLINGNESS TO NEGOTIATE 51 The Shift in American Opinion 51 Signals, Noise and Preconditions for Negotiations 58 The Shift in American Policy 60 The Shift in Cuba's Policy 65 5 NEGOTIATIONS: THE INTERESTS, OBJECTIVES, AND STRATEGIES OF THE PRINCIPALS 71 The Soviet Stake in the Negotiations 71 Cuba's New International Strategy 76 United States Strategy 83 Our Bilateral Policy: Negotiations 87 Cuba's Third Option 94 Projections for the Coming Months 95 1 INTRODUCTION The United States seems to be, in the words of Dean Acheson, "approaching the end of an error" in its policy toward Cuba. After several false starts, the Organization of American States sanctions against Cuba were virtually abandoned by the OAS foreign ministers at the San Jose, Costa Rica, meeting held in July 1975. Moreover, American officials now talk openly of negotiating with the Cuban government in the near future. Despite the growing demand for a change in policy, however, little analysis of what is involved in resuming relations with Cuba has been attempted. The expectation seems to be that a revision of American policy is urgently needed and the rest will somehow fall into place. Taking no thought for the morrow may be good Christianity, but it is not prudent statecraft. This essay's central assumption is that, while relations with Cuba are inevitable (though not necessarily desirable), the precise nature of these relations is still very much open to question. For example, will it be easier for the United States to deal with Fidel Castro, the pro-Soviet Communist of 1975, than it was to handle the Jacobin nationalist of 1959? Are we faced with the prospect of a permanent Soviet military base in the Caribbean or is that worry irrelevant in an era of detente and long-range nuclear weapons? Assuming that the Cubans have dropped their strategy of promoting guerrilla warfare, does that signal a rapprochement with the United States or merely the substitution of some more effective anti-Ameri­ can policy? American leaders have more than these issues to worry about. They must also be aware of the long history, often unhappy and often distorted for partisan advantage, of Cuban-American relations. They must also face the fact that our dealings with Cuba have been 1 and will always be a classic instance of a big power-little power confrontation. And last, they must come to terms with the mistakes and false perceptions that have dogged American policy in the recent past. Once past errors are understood, there is the problem of fashion­ ing a workable strategy for the coming negotiations. First, American leaders must come to grips with Cuban and Soviet ambitions in the region-both their objectives and their strategy-before sorting out American goals in the future talks. Nothing could be more foolhardy than a fatuous optimism over these negotiations, an optimism based on the notion that bad relations were and are simply the result of u.S. intransigence. Finally, we must ask what specific issues need to be discussed and what can we reasonably expect from these discussions? Cuban-American relations, past, present, and probably future, are not an easy or pleasant subject to examine. At every turn we encounter failures, mistakes, cross-purposes, and great, perhaps un­ bridgeable, differences. Yet we remain near neighbors, as the Cuban premier has recently reminded us, and some kind of modus vivendi will be worked out. This essay is an attempt to discuss the problems of doing so and to layout the best strategy for the coming negotia- -tions. There is no perfect solution, and none is offered here, but it is at least possible to expose some of the hidden rocks on which previous American leaders have seen their policies wrecked. 2 2 CUBA AND THE UNITED STATES: FROM THE BEGINNINGS TO 1959 Let us begin with the obvious. The current sorry state of Cuban­ American relations is in part the result of problems that have con­ tinually plagued Cubans in the course of the island's history-and that have intermittently concerned, and baffled, Americans. But what happened before 1959 did not determine the course of the Cuban revolution. The current regime is certainly not inexplicable in terms of the Cuban past-but Fidel Castro was not inevitable nor did the United States necessarily deserve what it got. But while historical inquiry can indicate the problem areas of Cuban-American relations, there is no agreement on precisely what the problems are and exactly who is to blame. In fact, there are three contending interpretations of the history of Cuban-American relations. The first, basically Marxist, and of course favored in Havana, assumes that the United States is the villain. Its greed for empire and treasure drove it to preventing an authentically Cuban regime from taking power-at least until 1959. After that, quite naturally, it made every attempt to destroy the new regime. The second interpretation comes close to the Cuba sf, Yanqui sf model: mistakes have been made on both sides, though the United States is perhaps the worse offender; with a measure of understand­ ing and patience, however, even the United States's hostility can be resolved eventually. After all, if the United States can work with the Soviet leaders and the Chinese, surely the neighboring Cubans can also be caught in the net of detente.1 1 It is often overlooked that the China-U.S.S.R. analogy is, for a number of reasons, not very appropriate for Cuba. That small Communist state is much closer in outlook and self-interest to North Vietnam and North Korea which have also resisted ending the cold war. 3 The third position assumes that mistakes have been made by the United States and Cuba, both before and after 1959, but emphasizes fundamental differences rooted in conflicting interests, passions, and perceptions of one another that will never be resolved easily or com­ pletely. Cuban-American relations will continue to be difficult at best, if not virtually impossible. ' But whichever of these interpretations one accepts, neither the Castro government nor American dealings with it will ever be com­ prehensible unless the past is weighed and found wanting, in terms of both what the Cubans have done to themselves and what we have done to and for them.
Recommended publications
  • Whither Communism: a Comparative Perspective on Constitutionalism in a Postsocialist Cuba Jon L
    University of Florida Levin College of Law UF Law Scholarship Repository UF Law Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 2009 Whither Communism: A Comparative Perspective on Constitutionalism in a Postsocialist Cuba Jon L. Mills University of Florida Levin College of Law, [email protected] Daniel Ryan Koslosky Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons Recommended Citation Jon Mills & Daniel Ryan Koslosky, Whither Communism: A Comparative Perspective on Constitutionalism in a Postsocialist Cuba, 40 Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev. 1219 (2009), available at, http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/522 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at UF Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in UF Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UF Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WHITHER COMMUNISM: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE ON CONSTITUTIONALISM IN A POSTSOCIALIST CUBA JON MILLS* AND DANIEL RYAN KOSLOSIc4 I. INTRODUCTION ........................................ 1220 II. HISTORY AND BACKGROUND ............................ 1222 A. Cuban ConstitutionalLaw .......................... 1223 1. Precommunist Legacy ........................ 1223 2. Communist Constitutionalism ................ 1225 B. Comparisons with Eastern Europe ................... 1229 1. Nationalizations in Eastern Europe ........... 1230 2. Cuban Expropriations ........................ 1231 III. MODES OF CONSTITUTIONALISM: A SCENARIO ANALYSIS. 1234 A. Latvia and the Problem of ConstitutionalInheritance . 1236 1. History, Revolution, and Reform ............. 1236 2. Resurrecting an Ancien Rgime ................ 1239 B. Czechoslovakia and Poland: Revolutions from Below .. 1241 1. Poland's Solidarity ........................... 1241 2. Czechoslovakia's Velvet Revolution ........... 1244 3. New Constitutionalism ....................... 1248 C. Hungary's GradualDecline and Decay ..............
    [Show full text]
  • June 20, 1966 Report on a Meeting Between Enver Hoxha and DPRK Ambassador an Yong
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified June 20, 1966 Report on a Meeting between Enver Hoxha and DPRK Ambassador An Yong Citation: “Report on a Meeting between Enver Hoxha and DPRK Ambassador An Yong,” June 20, 1966, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, AQPPSH, MPP Korese, D 3, V. 1966. Translated for NKIDP by Enkel Daljani. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/114407 Summary: Enver Hoxha meets with the North Korean Ambassador to Albania, An Yong, to discuss North Korea's foreign relations, Titoist and Khrushchevian revisionism, the communist movement, and bilateral relations. Credits: This document was made possible with support from the Leon Levy Foundation. Original Language: Albanian Contents: English Translation THE MEETING BETWEEN THE FIRST SECRETARY OF THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF THE ALBANIAN LABOR PARTY, COMRADE ENVER HOXHA, AND THE AMBASSADOR OF THE DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF KOREA, AN YONG, ON THE OCCASION OF HIS FINAL DEPARTURE FROM ALBANIA, ON JUNE 20, 1966 After Comrade Enver Hoxha received the ambassador and went to the quarters where the conversation would take place, he asked him about the health of Comrade [General Secretary of the Korean Worker’s Party (KWP)] Kim Il Sung and also expressed his regret that after a stay of several years, the ambassador is leaving Albania. “But you are Albanians now,” said Comrade Enver Hoxha to the North Korean ambassador. Ambassador An Yong: Since the time I set off for Albania, where I have stayed for a relatively long time, I had a recommendation from the party and government to do all that is possible to accomplish my task within the framework of our great friendship.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rhetoric of Fidel Castro Brent C
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2008 From the mountains to the podium: the rhetoric of Fidel Castro Brent C. Kice Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Kice, Brent C., "From the mountains to the podium: the rhetoric of Fidel Castro" (2008). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1766. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1766 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. FROM THE MOUNTAINS TO THE PODIUM: THE RHETORIC OF FIDEL CASTRO A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Communication Studies by Brent C. Kice B.A., Loyola University New Orleans, 2002 M.A., Southeastern Louisiana University, 2004 December 2008 DEDICATION To my wife, Dori, for providing me strength during this arduous journey ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Andy King for all of his guidance, and especially his impeccable impersonations. I also wish to thank Stephanie Grey, Ruth Bowman, Renee Edwards, David Lindenfeld, and Mary Brody for their suggestions during this project. I am so thankful for the care and advice given to me by Loretta Pecchioni.
    [Show full text]
  • Alan Mcpherson on Sad and Luminous Days: Cuba's
    James G. Blight, Philip Brenner. Sad and Luminous Days: Cuba's Struggle with the Superpowers after the Missile Crisis. Lanham and Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2002. xxvii + 324 pp. $29.95, cloth, ISBN 978-0-7425-2288-6. Reviewed by Alan McPherson Published on H-Diplo (January, 2003) "Empathy" for Cuba's Missile Crisis explained.[2] Castro himself has been making that Every few months, it seems, new evidence or case since a similar 1992 conference, not only by revelations about the Cuban Missile Crisis come to releasing new evidence but also by personally light to underscore the seriousness of that mo‐ taking part in the discussions. ment in human history. Most recently, the forti‐ Why Castro has been so willing to oversee eth-anniversary conference in Havana in October this rewriting of history is largely explained in 2002 brought Cuban leader Fidel Castro together James Blight and Philip Brenner's short but with scholars as well as surviving Kennedy and uniquely valuable book, Sad and Luminous Days: Khrushchev advisers to add still more insight into Cuba's Struggle with the Superpowers after the how close the world came to annihilation. There, Missile Crisis. Their description of Castro's bitter‐ the assembled learned, for instance, that two offi‐ ness, at what he perceived to be Nikita cers of a Soviet submarine, out of touch with Mos‐ Khrushchev's betrayal, has come out now with the cow and besieged by U.S. depth charges, had actu‐ end of the Cold War and the dissolution of the So‐ ally begun the process of launching a nuclear at‐ viet Union.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 a New Political Dawn: the Cuban Revolution in the 1960S
    Notes 1 A New Political Dawn: The Cuban Revolution in the 1960s 1. For an outline of the events surrounding the Padilla Affair, see chapter two. 2. Kenner and Petras limited themselves to mentioning the enormous importance of a Cuban Revolution with which a great number of the North American New Left identified. They also dedicated their book to the Cuban and Vietnamese people for “giving North Americans the possibility of making a revolution” (1972: 5). 3. For an explanation of the term gauchiste and of its relevance to the New Left, see chapter six. 4. However, this consideration has been rather critical in the case of Minogue (1970). 5. The general consensus seems to be that, as the Revolution entered a period of rapid Sovietization following the failure of the ten million ton sugar harvest of 1970, Western intellectuals, who until then had showed support, sought to distance themselves from the Revolution. The single incident that seemingly sparked this reaction, in particular from some French intellectuals, was the Padilla Affair. 6. Here a clear distinction must be made mainly between the Communist Party of the pre-Revolutionary period, the Partido Socialista Popular (Popular Socialist Party) and the 26 July Movement (MR26). The former had a legacy of Popular Frontism, collaboration with Batista in the post- War period and a general distrust of “middle class adventurers” as it referred to the leadership of MR26 until 1958 (Karol, 1971: 150). The latter, led by Castro, had a radical though incoherently articulated ideo- logical basis. The process of unification of revolutionary organizations carried out between 1961 and 1965 did not completely obliterate the individuality of these competing discourses and it was in their struggle for supremacy that the New Left’s contribution was made.
    [Show full text]
  • Racism in Cuba Ronald Jones
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound International Immersion Program Papers Student Papers 2015 A Revolution Deferred: Racism in Cuba Ronald Jones Follow this and additional works at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/ international_immersion_program_papers Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Ronald Jones, "A Revolution Deferred: Racism in Cuba," Law School International Immersion Program Papers, No. 9 (2015). This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Papers at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Immersion Program Papers by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqw ertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwert yuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopaA Revolution Deferred sdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfRacism in Cuba 4/25/2015 ghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghj Ron Jones klzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklz xcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn mqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmq wertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwe rtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwerty uiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuio pasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopas dfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfg hjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjk Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 2 Slavery in Cuba .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom's Mirror Cuba and Haiti in the Age of Revolution by Ada Ferrer
    Freedom’s Mirror During the Haitian Revolution of 1791–1804,arguablythemostradi- cal revolution of the modern world, slaves and former slaves succeeded in ending slavery and establishing an independent state. Yet on the Spanish island of Cuba, barely fifty miles away, the events in Haiti helped usher in the antithesis of revolutionary emancipation. When Cuban planters and authorities saw the devastation of the neighboring colony, they rushed to fill the void left in the world market for sugar, to buttress the institutions of slavery and colonial rule, and to prevent “another Haiti” from happening in their territory. Freedom’s Mirror follows the reverberations of the Haitian Revolution in Cuba, where the violent entrenchment of slavery occurred at the very moment that the Haitian Revolution provided a powerful and proximate example of slaves destroying slavery. By creatively linking two stories – the story of the Haitian Revolution and that of the rise of Cuban slave society – that are usually told separately, Ada Ferrer sheds fresh light on both of these crucial moments in Caribbean and Atlantic history. Ada Ferrer is Professor of History and Latin American and Caribbean Studies at New York University. She is the author of Insurgent Cuba: Race, Nation, and Revolution, 1868–1898,whichwonthe2000 Berk- shire Book Prize for the best first book written by a woman in any field of history. Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 131.111.164.128 on Tue May 03 17:50:21 BST 2016. http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ebook.jsf?bid=CBO9781139333672 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2016 Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 131.111.164.128 on Tue May 03 17:50:21 BST 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Sino-Venezuelan Relations: Beyond Oil
    Issues & Studies© 44, no. 3 (September 2008): 99-147. Sino-Venezuelan Relations: Beyond Oil JOSEPH Y. S. CHENG AND HUANGAO SHI Sino-Venezuelan relations have witnessed an unprecedented inti- macy since the beginning of Hugo Chávez's presidency in 1999. While scholars hold divergent views on the possible implications of the suddenly improved bilateral relationship, they have reached a basic consensus that oil has been the driving force. This article explores the underlying dy- namics of this relationship from the Chinese perspective. It argues that oil interest actually plays a rather limited role and will continue to remain an insignificant variable in Sino-Venezuelan ties in the foreseeable future. Despite the apparent closeness of the ties in recent years, the foundation forcontinued improvement in the future seems farfromsolid. Sino-Venezue- lan relations have caused serious concerns in the United States, which, for centuries, have seen Latin America as its sphere of influence. Although the neo-conservatives are worried about the deviant Chávez administration and a rising China, the chance of any direct U.S. intervention remains slim. Nevertheless, the China-U.S.-Venezuelan triangular relationship poses a JOSEPH Y. S. CHENG (鄭宇碩) is chair professor of political science and coordinator of the Contemporary China Research Project, City University of Hong Kong. He is the founding editor of the Hong Kong Journal of Social Sciences and The Journal of Comparative Asian Development. He has published widely on political development in China and Hong Kong, Chinese foreign policy, and local government in southern China. His e-mail address is <[email protected]>.
    [Show full text]
  • Cuban Communism: from Orthodoxy to Heresy to Orthodoxy
    CUBAN COMMUNISM: FROM ORTHODOXY TO HERESY TO ORTHODOXY Terrance William Witt BOA. Simon Fraser University, 1972. A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Political Science, Sociology and Anthropology. Terrance William Witt 1974 @ Simon Fraser University January 1975 All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. Name: Terrance Mi11 iam Witt Degree: Master of Arts Title of Thesls: Cuban Comnunlsm: From Orthodoxy to Heresy to Orthodox);. t Examining Conmi ttee : Chairman: Professor da1 e Bratton - - ~- -- - Dr. M. ~al~er!n: Senfor Supervisor -1 -- .. - ~- - 1 Professor R. I. External Ex Department of History Simon Fraser Unlversl ty Date Approved: PARTIAL COPYRICHT LICEN~E I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to.lend my thesis or dissertation (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for 'such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its 'own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying ' or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Title of ~hesis/~issertation: Cuban Communism: From Orthodoxy to Heresy to Orthodoxy Author: CI1 - (signature) (name ) I (date) ABSTRACT The first chapter of this thesis explains why the Cuban C.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Policies Toward the Cuban and Nicaraguan Revolutions
    SOVIET POLICIES TOWARD THE CUBAN AND NICARAGUAN REVOLUTIONS: A COMPARISON By SHANNON JOAN SELIN B.A.(Hons.), The University of Saskatchewan, 1985 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Department of Political Science We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA August 1986 ©Shannon Joan Selin, 1986 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of Mit-icod Sden^e The University of British Columbia 1956 Main Mall Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Y3 Date Aatjuir ^57 l*8(> ABSTRACT This thesis compares Soviet policy toward the Cuban revolution during the period 1959 to 1962 with that toward the Nicaraguan revolution from 1979 to the present in order to determine if the oft-levelled accusation that Nicaragua is "another Cuba" holds true. The initial Soviet reactions to the revolutions, subsequent Soviet economic, political, and military support for the new regimes, and the Soviet response to Cuban and Nicaraguan ideological declarations are examined, as is the effect of the revolutions on Soviet doctrine and on the Soviet prognosis for revolutionary success in Latin America.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Benjamin Nicolas Narvaez 2010
    Copyright by Benjamin Nicolas Narvaez 2010 The Dissertation Committee for Benjamin Nicolas Narvaez Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Chinese Coolies in Cuba and Peru: Race, Labor, and Immigration, 1839-1886 Committee: Jonathan C. Brown, Supervisor Evelyn Hu-DeHart Seth W. Garfield Frank A. Guridy Susan Deans-Smith Madeline Y. Hsu Chinese Coolies in Cuba and Peru: Race, Labor, and Immigration, 1839-1886 by Benjamin Nicolas Narvaez, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2010 Dedication To my parents Leon and Nancy, my brother David, and my sister Cristina. Acknowledgements Throughout the process of doing the research and then writing this dissertation, I benefitted immensely from the support of various individuals and institutions. I could not have completed the project without their help. I am grateful to my dissertation committee. My advisor, Dr. Jonathan Brown, reasonable but at the same time demanding in his expectations, provided me with excellent guidance. In fact, during my entire time as a graduate student at the University of Texas at Austin, he was a model of the excellence of which a professional historian is capable. Dr. Evelyn Hu-DeHart was kind enough to take an interest in my work and gave me valuable advice. This project would not have been possible without her pioneering research on Asians in Latin America. I also wish to thank the other members of my dissertation committee – Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Afro-Asian Sociocultural Interactions in Cultural Production by Or About Asian Latin Americans
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 26 September 2018 doi:10.20944/preprints201809.0506.v1 Peer-reviewed version available at Humanities 2018, 7, 110; doi:10.3390/h7040110 Afro-Asian Sociocultural Interactions in Cultural Production by or About Asian Latin Americans Ignacio López-Calvo University of California, Merced [email protected] Abstract This essay studies Afro-Asian sociocultural interactions in cultural production by or about Asian Latin Americans, with an emphasis on Cuba and Brazil. Among the recurrent characters are the black slave, the china mulata, or the black ally who expresses sympathy or even marries the Asian character. This reflects a common history of bondage shared by black slaves, Chinese coolies, and Japanese indentured workers, as well as a common history of marronage.1 These conflicts and alliances between Asians and blacks contest the official discourse of mestizaje (Spanish-indigenous dichotomies in Mexico and Andean countries, for example, or black and white binaries in Brazil and the Caribbean), which, under the guise of incorporating the Other, favored whiteness, all the while attempting to silence, ignore, or ultimately erase their worldviews and cultures. Keywords: Afro-Asian interactions, Asian Latin American literature and characters, Sanfancón, china mulata, “magical negro,” chinos mambises, Brazil, Cuba, transculturation, discourse of mestizaje Among the recurrent characters in literature by or about Asians in Latin America are the black slave, the china mulata, or the
    [Show full text]