DOCSLIB.ORG

How to Classify the Projectile Points from Monitor Valley, Nevada

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
How to Classify the Projectile Points from Monitor Valley, Nevada UC Merced Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology Title How to Classify the Projectile Points from Monitor Valley, Nevada Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6477q5zn Journal Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 3(1) ISSN 0191-3557 Author Thomas, David Hurst Publication Date 1981-07-01 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 7-43 (1981). How to Classify the Projectile Points from Monitor Valley, Nevada DAVID HURST THOMAS CCORDING to Willey and Sabloff when they do traditional studies such as A(1980), American archaeology's refining chronologies and typologies: in truth, Classificatory-Historical Period ended in archaeologists conducting such research are in 1960; we are now in the Explanatory Period. danger of being branded "old fashioned," or concerned with the nature of ecological sys­ even worse, "normative." tems, the use of hypothetico-deductive rea­ This paper is concerned strictly with soning, and above all, the search for timeless- typology, offered without apology. My ulti­ spaceless processes. Archaeology certainly has mate interests in Great Basin archaeology far come a long way in the past two decades. exceed "mere chronology," but I realized In fact, we may have come too quickly. some time ago that without proper attention As I have argued elsewhere (Thomas to absolute chronology, archaeologists can 1979:137-146), contemporary American literally forget the more anthropological archaeology has not one but three primary goals—both in the Great Basin and elsewhere. and sequentially ordered objectives; archae­ My aim is to review and revise the ology's initial goal is to define cultural chron­ post-Mazama (i.e., post-5000 B.C.) projectile ologies; the intermediate objective is to recon­ point chronology for a portion of the Great struct prehistoric lifeways; the ultimate objec­ Basin. The evolution of this chronology is tive is to explain cultural processes. But in the considered briefly, and the current problems rush to explain the processes, many archae­ in its application are highlighted. Two kinds ologists jump the gun, failing to take the time of new data are then brought to bear on the and effort to establish the proper archaeologi­ problems. cal foundation. Simply stated, archaeologists Recent research in Monitor Valley, must spend the time to flesh out the nuances Nevada, has produced a large series of projec­ of chronology and lifeway before tackling the tile points, from both stratified and surface processes which allegedly explain such pre­ sites. Nearly half of these points come from historic behavior. There are no shortcuts. the radiocarbon-dated deposits of Gatecliff Living in the Explanatory Period has Shelter, providing the basis of the newly jaded many contemporary archaeologists. Too proposed Monitor Valley typology, which often, we require our colleagues to apologize roughly spans the past six thousand years.' David Hurst Thomas, American Museum of Natural The Monitor Valley typology is then History, Central Park West at 79th, New York, NY examined against a Great Basin Database, a 10024. battery of standardized, operational measure- 1] 8 JOURNAL OF CALIFORNIA AND GREAT BASIN ANTHROPOLOGY ments for roughly 6000 Great Basin projectile form of the arrow point," generally without points. These points were reanalyzed to pro­ elaboration. vide a significantly large body of comparative, Although Great Basin archaeologists in systematic data. The objective is specifically the 1930's and 1940's generally showed little to determine how far the Monitor Valley interest in classification beyond bald descrip­ typology can be generalized. tion, the work of Luthur Cressman stands as a While hardly a cure-all for the typological notable exception. Cressman often prefaced woes of Great Basin archaeology, the Monitor material culture discussions with a considera­ Valley typology does provide a standardized tion of "Basis of Classification" or "Principles method of approaching an important class of of Classification" (e.g., Cressman 1942:33, material culture; but there are important 53, 63). Also significant is Cressman's use of spatial and temporal hmitations on the typol­ the technological attributes ("structural fea­ ogy. Please pay especial attention to these tures") to classify basketry, mats, and sandals. limitations. A similar attempt was made in the classifi­ cation of projectile points from the Roaring EVOLUTION OF GREAT BASIN Springs site (Cressman, Williams, and Krieger PROJECTILE POINT TYPOLOGY 1940:41-47). Largely the work of Alex Krie­ ger, the Roaring Springs classification began Before introducing the empirical data, it is with 28 morphological types, which were necessary to consider briefly the under­ subsequently grouped into nine major tem­ pinnings of the typology being proposed here: poral types using stratigraphic criteria. how it evolved, what it assumes, and what are Although this system was not adopted by its pitfalls. later investigators, the criteria were metrically The nature of typology was of Httle defined and the results tallied quantitatively. practical concern to most Great Basin archae­ The Cressman-Krieger discussions of typology ologists prior to about 1950. While working at strike a remarkably contemporary tone. Lovelock Cave in 1912, for example, L. L. The next major typological step appeared Loud's concern was not with typology and in the Danger Cave monograph (Jennings classification at all, but rather with recovering 1957) which is indicative of changes in as many exhibit quality artifacts as possible. archaeological thinking during the early Although Loud roughly grouped the artifacts 1950's. Like Cressman and Krieger, Jennings into conventional categories—such as twined specifically emphasized his assumptions and and coiled basketry types—these classes were biases: wholly intuitive and undefined (see notes in Although I hesitate to use the word type, its Heizer and Napton 1970). When M. R. Har­ use seems permissible if we consider it to be rington reexcavated the site and reclassified a relatively small collection of materials the material culture, he did not care about the which because of form and material seems to nature of classification either. Harrington (in constitute a little unit not specifically identi­ Loud and Harrington 1929:110) used the cal with any other comparable small unit term "artifact type," but not in a consistent [Jennings 1957:99]. fashion. Similarly, Julian Steward's (1937) Jennings employed a series of 87 "non­ report on the Promontory Cave excavations committal laboratory number designators," focussed on the individual specimens, rarely noting that such numbers "are easily forgot­ grouping objects into "types" at all. Steward ten, have no traditional aura, and readily (1937:13), for instance, discussed the "usual permit—even encourage—local type and sub- PROJECTILE POINTS FROM MONITOR VALLEY, NEVADA type lumping into broader named types when Baumhoff 1961:123; Heizer and Hester regional information is adequate for the estab­ 1978:153). lishment of those types which may actually Beginning with the important Baumhoff be cultural reahties" (Jennings 1957:100). (1957) and Baumhoff and Byrne (1959) Jennings candidly cautioned that "certainly articles, a flurry of papers appeared defining the work should be reexamined" and the the Great Basin projectile point sequence Danger Cave collection has indeed been reclas­ (e.g., Heizer and Baumhoff 1961; Clewlow sified a number of times (e.g., Riddell 1967; O'Connell 1967; Lanning 1963; Heizer, 1960:25-28; Aikens 1970:44-55; Thomas Baumhoff, and Clewlow 1968; Hester 1973; n.d.a.). In hindsight, the Jennings typology Heizer and Hester 1978; Heizer and Berger seems unduly cumbersome, but by the stand­ 1970). The temporal ranges of these types ards of the day, the Danger Cave system was were rather well established in the late 1960's, rather progressive. but much discussion was stimulated regarding the spatial limits to which these types could The Berkeley Typological System be extended (Aikens 1970; Adovasio and Fry Robert F. Heizer and a rich succession of 1972;Holmer 1978). graduate students at the University of Califor­ Almost from the beginning, Heizer and his nia, Berkeley, made a breakthrough in the colleagues anticipated the need for further classification of Great Basin material culture revision of the typological system: Heizer's in the mid-1950's. Heizer had been pursuing typology was at best a working approxima­ an intermittent program of excavation and tion, never presented or viewed as a final analysis of Great Basin archaeological mater­ product: ials since the 1930's; particularly noteworthy The determination of types was performed was his ambitious Basinwide site survey in on a strictly intuitive basis-we simply laid 193 7 (Thomas n.d.b.), and also the out all the points, gathering similar speci­ 1958-1959 interval when several key sites mens into groups. In such typological analy­ were excavated and analyzed, especially sis one often misses distinctions which later Wagon Jack Shelter (Heizer and Baumhoff turn out to be significant. In order to permit correction of such errors of omission and 1961), South Fork Shelter (Heizer, Baum­ commission by later students, we include a hoff, and Clewlow 1968) and Ruby Cave line drawing of each specimen [1961:123]. (unpublished). Material culture from Love­ lock Cave was reanalyzed at this time,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lovelock-Cave-Back-Country-Byway
    Back Country Byways . An Invitation to Discover There is an axiom among seasoned travelers advising that the best way to get to know a new place is to get off the highway and visit the back roads, the side trails and the hidden, out-of-the-way corners where the true qualities wait to be discovered. The same axiom holds true for America’s public lands, the vast reaches of our nation that are all too often seen only from the windows of speeding cars or the tiny portholes of airliners. The Bureau of Land Management, America’s largest land managing agency, is providing an exciting opportunity for more Americans to get to know their lands by getting off the main roads for leisurely trips on a series of roads and trails being dedicated as Back Country Byways. The Back Country Byways Program, an outgrowth of the national Scenic Byways Program, is designed to encourage greater use of these existing back roads through greater public awareness. The system is BUREAUREAU OOFF LANDLAND MANMANAGEMENTGEMENT expected to expand to 100 roads when completed. In Nevada, each byway has a character and beauty of its own, taking travelers through scenery that is uniquely Nevadan, into historic areas that helped shape our state and near areas that have been largely untouched by man. They can see the multiple uses of their lands and come to a greater awareness of the need for the conservation and wise use of these resources. And all this can be accomplished at little cost to the taxpayer. Because the roads are already in place, only interpretive signs and limited facilities are needed to better serve the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoindian Mobility Ranges Predicted by the Distribution of Projectile Points Made of Upper Mercer and Flint Ridge Flint
    Paleoindian Mobility Ranges Predicted by the Distribution of Projectile Points Made of Upper Mercer and Flint Ridge Flint A thesis submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts by Amanda Nicole Mullett December, 2009 Thesis written by Amanda Nicole Mullett B.A. Western State College, 2007 M.A. Kent State University, 2009 Approved by _____________________________, Advisor Dr. Mark F. Seeman _____________________________, Chair, Department of Anthropology Dr. Richard Meindl _____________________________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Dr. Timothy Moerland ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ............................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ........................................................................................................................... v List of Appendices .................................................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... vi Chapter I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................1 II. Background ...................................................................................................................5 The Environment.............................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Aartswoud, 210, 211, 213, 217 Abri Dufaure, 221, 225, 257 Abydos
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-86617-0 - Birds Dale Serjeantson Index More information INDEX Aartswoud, 210, 211, 213, 217 American coot, 106, 108, 122, 147, 403 Abri Dufaure, 221, 225, 257 American Ornithologist’s Union, 419 Abydos, 245 American Southwest, 177, 189, 193, 289, 291, Acheulian culture, 261 292, 312, 333, 345, 399, 400, 450 Africa, 3, 9, 72, 165, 180, 261, 280, 285, 311, 333. amulet, 200, 201, 226, 227, 229, 359. See also See also North Africa, South Africa, talisman West Africa analogue fauna, 369 African collared dove, 304 Anasazi, 289, 292 African goose. See Chinese goose Anatolia, 271, 320, 337, 354, 359. See also age class, 45–47, 240, 267 Turkey ageing, 35–38, 45, 398. See also fusion, ancient DNA, 34, 285, 292, 314, 396, 399 porosity albatross, 69 bone length, 43, 44, 46, 61 chicken, 69, 268, 273 incremental lines, 40–43 grey geese, 69, 296-297 line of arrested growth (LAG), 40, 42 turkey, 291 Aggersund, 200, 257, 449 Andean condor, 9, 403 agricultural clearance, 315, 365, 374, 377, 385 Anglo-Saxon period, 225, 297, 299, 344, agriculture, 252, 265, 300, 306, 376, 381, 383 364 marginal, 230, 263, 400 Animal Bone Metrical Archive Project, 71, Ain Mallaha, 372 421 Ainu, 206, 336 Antarctica, 14, 252, 266 Ajvide, 51, 154, 221, 259 anthropogenic assemblage, 156 Alabama, 211 recognising, 100, 104, 130–131 Alaska, 14, 195, 210, 226, 246, 363 Apalle Cave, 376, 377 Aldrovandi, 274, 303 Apicius, 341, 343 Aleutian Islands, 204, 214, 216, 226, 231, 252, Aquincum, 342, 351 445 Arabia, 316, 325 Alligator site, 198 archaeological project manager, 84, 343, 397 Alpine chough.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Archaeologist Volume 43 No
    OHIO ARCHAEOLOGIST VOLUME 43 NO. 2 SPRING 1993 Published by THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF OHIO The Archaeological Society of Ohio MEMBERSHIP AND DUES Annual dues to the Archaeological Society of Ohio are payable on the first TERM of January as follows: Regular membership $17.50; husband and wife EXPIRES A.S.O. OFFICERS (one copy of publication) $18.50; Life membership $300.00. Subscription to the Ohio Archaeologist, published quarterly, is included in the member­ 1994 President Larry L. Morris, 901 Evening Star Avenue SE, East ship dues. The Archaeological Society of Ohio is an incorporated non­ Canton, OH 44730, (216) 488-1640 profit organization. 1994 Vice President Stephen J. Parker, 1859 Frank Drive, Lancaster, OH 43130, (614)653-6642 BACK ISSUES 1994 Exec. Sect. Donald A. Casto, 138 Ann Court, Lancaster, OH Publications and back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist: Ohio Flint Types, by Robert N. Converse $10.00 add $1.50 P-H 43130,(614)653-9477 Ohio Stone Tools, by Robert N. Converse $ 8.00 add $1.50 P-H 1994 Recording Sect. Nancy E. Morris, 901 Evening Star Avenue Ohio Slate Types, by Robert N. Converse $15.00 add $1.50 P-H SE. East Canton, OH 44730, (216) 488-1640 The Glacial Kame Indians, by Robert N. Converse .$20.00 add $1.50 P-H 1994 Treasurer Don F. Potter, 1391 Hootman Drive, Reynoldsburg, 1980's & 1990's $ 6.00 add $1.50 P-H OH 43068, (614)861-0673 1970's $ 8.00 add $1.50 P-H 1998 Editor Robert N. Converse, 199 Converse Dr., Plain City, OH 1960's $10.00 add $1.50 P-H 43064,(614)873-5471 Back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist printed prior to 1964 are gener­ ally out of print but copies are available from time to time.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Atlatl Bibliography John Whittaker Grinnell College Version June 20, 2012
    1 Annotated Atlatl Bibliography John Whittaker Grinnell College version June 20, 2012 Introduction I began accumulating this bibliography around 1996, making notes for my own uses. Since I have access to some obscure articles, I thought it might be useful to put this information where others can get at it. Comments in brackets [ ] are my own comments, opinions, and critiques, and not everyone will agree with them. The thoroughness of the annotation varies depending on when I read the piece and what my interests were at the time. The many articles from atlatl newsletters describing contests and scores are not included. I try to find news media mentions of atlatls, but many have little useful info. There are a few peripheral items, relating to topics like the dating of the introduction of the bow, archery, primitive hunting, projectile points, and skeletal anatomy. Through the kindness of Lorenz Bruchert and Bill Tate, in 2008 I inherited the articles accumulated for Bruchert’s extensive atlatl bibliography (Bruchert 2000), and have been incorporating those I did not have in mine. Many previously hard to get articles are now available on the web - see for instance postings on the Atlatl Forum at the Paleoplanet webpage http://paleoplanet69529.yuku.com/forums/26/t/WAA-Links-References.html and on the World Atlatl Association pages at http://www.worldatlatl.org/ If I know about it, I will sometimes indicate such an electronic source as well as the original citation. The articles use a variety of measurements. Some useful conversions: 1”=2.54
    [Show full text]
  • The Chewaucan Cave Cache: the Upper and Lower Chewaucan Marshes
    Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology | Vol. 33, No. 1 (2013) | pp. 72–87 The Chewaucan Cave Cache: the Upper and Lower Chewaucan marshes. Warner provided a typed description of the cave location and A Specialized Tool Kit from the collector’s findings; that document is included in the Eastern Oregon museum accession file. He described the cave as being nearly filled to the ceiling with silt, stone, sticks, animal ELIZABETH A. KALLENBACH Museum of Natural and Cultural History bone, and feces. On their first day of excavation, the 1224 University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1224 diggers sifted through fill and basalt rocks from roof fall, finding projectile points, charred animal bone, and The Chewaucan Cave cache, discovered in 1967 by relic pieces of cordage and matting. On the second day, they collectors digging in eastern Oregon, consists of a large discovered the large grass bag. grass bag that contained a number of other textiles and Warner’s description noted that the bag was leather, including two Catlow twined baskets, two large “located about eight feet in from the mouth of the cave folded linear nets, snares, a leather bag, a badger head and two feet below the surface.” It was covered by a pouch, other hide and cordage, as well as a decorated piece of tule matting, and lay on a bed of grass, with a basalt maul. One of the nets returned an Accelerator Mass sage rope looped around the bag. The bag contained Spectrometry (AMS) radiocarbon date of 340 ± 40 B.P. two large Catlow twined baskets, a leather bag, and The cache has been noted in previous publications, but leather-wrapped cordage and sinew bundles.
    [Show full text]
  • Teoc Creek a Poverty Point Site in Carroll County
    ... Archaeological Report No. 3 TEOC CREEK A Poverty Point Site .. in Carroll County, Mississippi by John M. Connaway Samuel o. McGahey Clarence H. Webb With Geological Analysis by Roger T. Saucier Edited by Priscilla M. Lowrey Mississippi Department of Archives and History Jackson, Mississippi Elbert R. Hilliard, Director 1977 - - - CONTENTS Page List of Illustrations v List of Tables vii Preface viii Acknowledgements ix 1. The Teoc Creek Site 1 .. 2. Explorations and Excavations 5 1966 Explorations 5 1969 Explorations 9 1970 Excavation 15 3. Artifacts and Raw Materials 34 .. Core Tools . 34 Blade Tools 50 Flake Tools, Flakes, and Chipping Debris 52 Raw Materials of Flaked Stone Tools • • 57 Miscellaneous Raw Materials , . • 62 Ground Stone Artifacts • 65 Miscellaneous 73 Poverty Point Objects • 74 Basketry-Impressed Baked Clay Objects 81 Pottery and Stone Vessels 87 4. Geological Analysis ••.•.. 90 5. Radiocarbon and Thermoluminescence Dates .106 iii 6. Comparisons with Other Sites .109 7. Summary and Conclusions .•117 References • .120 Index • • • • . • .124 ... ... - - - iv .. ILLUSTRATIONS FIGURES Page 1. Teoc Creek Site Map • . • . • • . 2 2. 1966 Traverse 2 and 1970 Profile Trench 7 3. Details of Test Pit 3 (1969)· . 12 4. Horizontal Plan, Levell (1970) •. 14 5. Horizontal Plan, Levels 2-6 (1970). 19 ... 6. Engraved Slate Gorgets· • 68 7. Mississippi River Meander Belts · · · . 94 ... 8. Stream Channel Changes in the Teoc Creek Site Area - Stage A · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 96 ... 9. Stream Channel Changes in the Teoc Creek Site Area - Stage B · · · · · ·· · · ·· · ·· ·· · · · · · · · 98 10. Stream Channel Changes in the Teoc Creek Site ... Area - Stage C · · · · · ·· ·· · · · · · · · · · · ·· · · · · 100 11. Stream Channel Changes in the Teoc Creek Site ..
    [Show full text]
  • Over 5,000 Years of History in Eastern Connecticut
    OVER 5,000 YEARS OF HISTORY IN EASTERN CONNECTICUT The Story of the Tower Hill Road Site WHAT ARE CULTURAL RESOURCES AND WHY ARE THEY IMPORTANT? Cultural resources may be anything that shows Unfortunately, these resources are fragile and evidence of having been made, used, or altered by nonrenewable. Unlike forests that can be replanted, humans. They represent the continuity of events once destroyed archaeological sites are gone forever. from the earliest evidence of human existence to the Objects from a site have little meaning unless they present day. Cultural resources that are pre-written can be related to specific soil layers (stratigraphy) record or pre-European contact in the New World and associated with other evidence of human activity, are called pre-contact or prehistoric, and those that such as a fire hearth, a trash pit, a burial pit, or the are post-written record/European contact are called structure of a building. Archaeologists call this post-contact or historic. Cultural resources range context . Any activity that disturbs the soil may from ruins that are thousands of years old to a destroy context and the scientific value of the nineteenth-century farmstead; from a small scattering archaeological site. A trained archaeologist manages of stone tools to an abandoned cart path. a site and records the information to preserve it for future generations. DIFFERENT TYPES OF CULTURAL RESOURCES bc a) Statue of Liberty in NY b) Kent Falls covered bridge in Litchfield County, CT c) Eighteenth century house foundation in Connecticut d) Native American pottery from New England d 2 IMAGINE EASTERN CONNECTICUT WITHOUT ROADS, BUILDINGS, OR FARM FIELDS AND WITH rich and varied forests, rolling hills, and free-flowing rivers and you have a picture of the landscape Native Americans inhabited thousands of years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecology of Puha: Identity, Orientation, and Shifting Perceptions Reflected Through Material Culture and Socioreligious Practice
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2021 THE ECOLOGY OF PUHA: IDENTITY, ORIENTATION, AND SHIFTING PERCEPTIONS REFLECTED THROUGH MATERIAL CULTURE AND SOCIORELIGIOUS PRACTICE Aaron Robert Atencio Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Atencio, Aaron Robert, "THE ECOLOGY OF PUHA: IDENTITY, ORIENTATION, AND SHIFTING PERCEPTIONS REFLECTED THROUGH MATERIAL CULTURE AND SOCIORELIGIOUS PRACTICE" (2021). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 11734. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/11734 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ECOLOGY OF PUHA: IDENTITY, ORIENTATION, AND SHIFTING PERCEPTIONS REFLECTED THROUGH MATERIAL CULTURE AND SOCIORELIGIOUS PRACTICE By AARON ROBERT ATENCIO Anthropology, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, U.S.A., 2021 Dissertation Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of PhD Philosophy of Anthropology The University of Montana Missoula, MT Official Graduation Date (May 2021) Approved by: Scott Whittenburg, Dean of The Graduate School Graduate
    [Show full text]
  • A Fluted Projectile Point Fragment from the Southern California Coast: Chronology and Context at CA-Sba-1951
    UC Merced Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology Title A Fluted Projectile Point Fragment from the Southern California Coast: Chronology and Context at CA-SBa-1951 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4db3j4bm Journal Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 9(1) ISSN 0191-3557 Authors Erlandson, Jon M Cooley, Theodore G Carrico, Richard Publication Date 1987-07-01 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California 120 JOURNAL OF CALIFORNIA AND GREAT BASIN ANTHROPOLOGY True, D. L. 1966 Archaeological Differentiation of Sho­ shonean and Yuman Speaking Groups in A Fluted Projectile Point Fragment Southern California. Ph.D. dissertation. from the Southern California Coast: University of California, Los Angeles. Chronology and Context Vastokas, J. M., and R. K. Vastokas at CA-SBa-1951 1973 Sacred Art of the Algonkians: A Study of the Peterborough Petroglyphs. Peter­ JON M. ERLANDSON, Dept. of Anthropology, borough, Ontario: Mansard Press. Univ. of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106. THEODORE G. COOLEY, WESTEC Sendees, WaUace, W. J. Inc., 1221 State Street, Santa Barbara, CA 93101. 1978 Post-Pleistocene Archaeology 9000 to RICHARD CARRICO, WESTEC Services, Inc., 2000 B.C. In: Handbook of the North 5510 Morehouse Drive, San Diego, CA 92121. American Indians, Vol. 8, California, R. F. Heizer, ed., pp. 25-36. Washington: RECENT archaeological research on the Smithsonian Institution. Santa Barbara coast yielded a fragment of a 1986 A Remarkable Group of Carved Stone fluted projectUe point among a larger lithic Objects from Pacific Palisades. Paper assemblage from CA-SBa-1951. The avail­ presented at the Society for California able data suggest that the fluted point has Southern California Data Sharing Meet­ no direct temporal relation to the remainder ing, Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Sturtz Unr 0139M 13151.Pdf
    University of Nevada, Reno A Natural and Cultural History of Leonard Rockshelter, Nevada A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology By Sara N. Sturtz Dr. Geoffrey Smith/Thesis Advisor May, 2020 THE GRADUATE SCHOOL We recommend that the thesis prepared under our supervision by entitled be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Advisor Committee Member Graduate School Representative David W. Zeh, Ph.D., Dean Graduate School i ABSTRACT Leonard Rockshelter (LRS) is located in Pershing County, Nevada. Robert Heizer excavated the site in 1950 and reported more than 2 m of stratified deposits from which he recovered a modest assemblage of perishable and lithic artifacts. Of interest to the University of Nevada Reno’s Great Basin Paleoindian Research Unit (GBPRU) was Heizer’s discovery of obsidian flakes in deposits dated to 11,199±570 14C BP (14,900- 11,610 cal BP). This possibility of a stratified Pleistocene occupation prompted the GBPRU to return to LRS in 2018 and 2019 for additional work, which produced few artifacts but a sizeable small mammal assemblage. In this thesis, I test two hypotheses: (1) the small mammal assemblage provides a paleoenvironmental record that demonstrates changing local conditions during the Terminal Pleistocene and Holocene; and (2) the shelter contains evidence of human occupation dating to the Terminal Pleistocene. My results demonstrate that the Early Holocene and initial Middle Holocene were more mesic than later periods. They also suggest that people did not occupy LRS until the Early Holocene, after which time they periodically returned to the site.
    [Show full text]