DOCSLIB.ORG

Nuclear Power:Technologyontrial/Jamesj.Duderstadtand Non-Commercial Purposes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nuclear Power:Technologyontrial/Jamesj.Duderstadtand Non-Commercial Purposes Nuclear power : technology on trial / James J. Duderstadt and Chihiro Kikuchi. Duderstadt, James J., 1942- Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press, c1979. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015003403014 Open Access, Google-digitized http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#oa-google This work is protected by copyright law. It is made available from HathiTrust with permission of the copyright holder. Permission must be requested from the rights holder for any subsequent use. The digital images and OCR of this work were produced by Google, Inc. (indicated by a watermark on each page in the PageTurner). Google requests that these images and OCR not be re-hosted, redistributed or used commercially. They are provided for educational, scholarly, non-commercial purposes. Generated for jjd (University of Michigan) on 2012-08-08 15:24 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015003403014 Open Access, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#oa-google Generated for jjd (University of Michigan) on 2012-08-08 15:24 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015003403014 Open Access, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#oa-google Generated for jjd (University of Michigan) on 2012-08-08 15:24 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015003403014 Open Access, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#oa-google Generated for jjd (University of Michigan) on 2012-08-08 15:24 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015003403014 Open Access, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#oa-google Generated for jjd (University of Michigan) on 2012-08-08 15:24 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015003403014 Open Access, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#oa-google Generated for jjd (University of Michigan) on 2012-08-08 15:24 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015003403014 Open Access, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#oa-google Generated for jjd (University of Michigan) on 2012-08-08 15:24 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015003403014 Open Access, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#oa-google Generated for jjd (University of Michigan) on 2012-08-08 15:24 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015003403014 Open Access, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#oa-google tO^<^A*^^;) Generated for jjd (University of Michigan) on 2012-08-08 15:24 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015003403014 Open Access, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#oa-google nuciJEnn POWER Generated for jjd (University of Michigan) on 2012-08-08 15:24 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015003403014 Open Access, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#oa-google Generated for jjd (University of Michigan) on 2012-08-08 15:24 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015003403014 Open Access, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#oa-google James J. Duderstadt Chihiro Kikuchi nUCLERR ROUUER Technology on Trial Ann Arbor The University of Michigan Press Generated for jjd (University of Michigan) on 2012-08-08 15:24 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015003403014 Open Access, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#oa-google Copyright © by The University of Michigan 1979 All rights reserved Published in the United States of America by The University of Michigan Press and simultaneously in Rexdale, Canada, by John Wiley & Sons Canada, Limited Manufactured in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Duderstadt, James J Nuclear power. 1942- Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Atomic power-plants. I. Kikuchi, Chihiro, 1914- TK1078.D83 621.48'3 ISBN 0-472-09311-8 ISBN (M72-06312-X pbk. Atomic power, joint author. II. Title. 79-16455 Generated for jjd (University of Michigan) on 2012-08-08 15:24 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015003403014 Open Access, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#oa-google I" 5~ To our students Generated for jjd (University of Michigan) on 2012-08-08 15:24 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015003403014 Open Access, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#oa-google Generated for jjd (University of Michigan) on 2012-08-08 15:24 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015003403014 Open Access, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#oa-google Preface Nuclear power has become the focus of great controversy. It is almost impossible to pick up a newspaper or turn on the television without encountering some aspect of the debate over this energy source. Are nuclear power plants safe from accident or terrorism? Will they permanently damage man's environment by discharging large quantities of hazardous substances such as radioactive waste or plutonium? Will the international transfer of nuclear power tech- nology accelerate the proliferation of nuclear weapons? Is nuclear power really economical when the staggering increases in plant construction costs, the reliability of nuclear plant operation, and hidden government subsidies are taken into account? The debate over the future role of nuclear power has taken on particularly ominous overtones in the light of the energy crisis that looms in our immediate future. The current imbalance between our ever-growing energy consumption and our capacity for supplying this energy poses a serious threat to society as we know it. We can achieve a new balance between energy supply and demand only by simultaneously stressing energy conservation while developing new sources of energy as rapidly as possible. Action will be effective only if this nation becomes broadly and pervasively aware of the energy problem, the nature of present energy usage, and the limited availability of conventional energy sources. We must be very realis- tic in our assessment of the options that are or may become available to alleviate the energy crisis. As one step to achieve public understanding, we have chosen to analyze the possible role of nuclear power in meeting the future energy requirements of our society. From a more general perspec- tive, nuclear power is an excellent case study of how society accepts or rejects a new technology to meet a perceived need, how it bal- ances the benefits against the risks of the technology to determine its suitability for massive implementation. A detailed study of nuclear power generation exhibits many features that will surface time and time again as our society attempts to adapt technology to its needs. We will evaluate critically the suitability of nuclear power as an energy source by examining this technology in terms of the most Generated for jjd (University of Michigan) on 2012-08-08 15:24 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015003403014 Open Access, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#oa-google viii Preface significant decision criteria: Does it possess a sufficient resource base? Is its impact on public safety and the environment acceptable? Will it represent an economically viable source of energy? As the nuclear power industry has matured, as it has passed from Fermi's demonstration of scientific feasibility to its present status of economic viability, so too has grown the public con- troversy over the role that nuclear power should play in our society. This book introduces readers to the technical issues involved in nuclear power generation so that they can rationally evaluate the future role of this energy source. We have chosen a level of presentation suitable for the broadest possible audience. No particular scientific background or familiarity has been assumed. Since only a modest introduction to the issues in nuclear power generation can be given in such a brief presentation, we have provided ample documentation to allow the interested reader to pursue further studies. We must caution the reader that although we have tried to look at both sides of controversial issues, some bias has inevitably crept into our discussion. As scientists and engineers who have partici- pated actively in nuclear energy research for many years, we could hardly be without an opinion. In this spirit we have confined most of our analysis to scientific evidence as we see it. We have avoided merely listing without critical comment the familiar pros and cons of this well-worn debate. We feel that far too few scientists have spoken out on these issues. As a result, the nuclear power debate has frequently drifted away from scientific fact into a dialogue in which scientific misunderstanding and half-truths are rampant. We sincerely hope that more scientific analyses such as this book will correct this alarming trend. This endeavor has benefited enormously from discussion with and encouragement from a great many colleagues including Profes- sors William Kerr, John Lee, Glenn Knoll, Thomas Brewer, William Martin, David Bach, and John King, along with Drs. Anthony Sinclair, Stanley Borowski, and Robert Campbell. A particular note of gratitude is due Alfred Slote and Anne Duderstadt for their assistance in translating scientific jargon into comprehensible lan- guage. We should admit that the real stimulus for this effort came from an entirely different quarter, from those who have been most outspoken in their condemnation of nuclear power. For it was the strong and frequent criticism of all aspects of nuclear power genera- tion voiced by these individuals that stirred within us a strong sense of scientific and social responsibility and that led to this book. Generated for jjd (University of Michigan)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Submission to the Nuclear Power Debate Personal Details Kept Confidential
    Submission to the Nuclear power debate Personal details kept confidential __________________________________________________________________________________________ Firstly I wish to say I have very little experience in nuclear energy but am well versed in the renewable energy one. What we need is a sound rational debate on the future energy requirements of Australia. The calls for cessation of nuclear investigations even before a debate begins clearly shows that emotion rather than facts are playing a part in trying to stop the debate. Future energy needs must be compliant to a sound strategy of consistent, persistent energy supply. This cannot come from wind or solar. Lets say for example a large blocking high pressure weather system sits over the Victorian, NSW land masses in late summer- autumn season. We will see low winds for anything up to a week, can the energy market from the other states support the energy needs of these states without coal or gas? I think not. France has a large investment in nuclear energy and charges their citizens around half as much for it than Germany. Sceptics complain about the costs of storage of waste, they do not suggest what is going to happen to all the costs to the environment when renewing of derelict solar panels and wind turbine infrastructure which is already reaching its use by dates. Sceptics also talk about the dangers of nuclear energy using Chernobyl, Three Mile Island and Fuklushima as examples. My goodness given that same rationale then we should have banned flight after the first plane accident or cars after the first car accident.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Prizewinner Seaborg Went Ahead with Mcmillan's Research Project and Within a Few Months He and His Associates Produced EDWITM
    Nobel Prizewinner Seaborg went ahead with McMillan's research project and within a few months he and his associates produced EDWITM. MCMILL\N, co-winner of the 1951 Nobel plutonium. which proved to be a vital element in the Prize for Chemistry. is the fourth Caltech scientist to construction of the atomic bomb. While working on the be awarded this highest of all scientific honors. The atom bomb project during the war. and after his return otheis: R. A. Millikan, who received the award in physics to the University of California, Seaborg produced, one in 1923; Thomas Hunt Morgan, honored in 1933 for his after another, elements 95 (americium), 96 ( curium), research in heredity: and Carl Anderson, whose discov- 97 (berkelium) and 98 (californium). ery of the positron won him a physics award in 1936. During the war Dr. McMillan not only worked on Dr. McMillan graduated from Caltech in 1928, re- microwave radar, but assisted in the development of ceived his M.S. here in 1929. and his Ph.D. from Prince- sonar a~ the Navy Radio and Sound Laboratory in San Ion iii 19:32. In that same year he went LO the [Tniversity Diego, California. and later joined the Los Alamos of California JLBerkeley as a National Research Fellow. Scientific Laboratory. McMillan helped Prof. J. Robert He has been on the faculty at Cal ever since. and has Oppenheirner organize the lab foi ihe development of lieen Professor of Physics there since 1946. the atomic bomb. He was in charge of early development Dr. McMillan shares this year's Nobel Chemistry of the Hiroshima bomb and later worked on the Naga- Award with his colleague at the University of California, saki type bomb.
    [Show full text]
  • *Revelle, Roger Baltimore 18, Maryland
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES July 1, 1962 OFFICERS Term expires President-Frederick Seitz June 30, 1966 Vice President-J. A. Stratton June 30, 1965 Home Secretary-Hugh L. Dryden June 30, 1963 Foreign Secretary-Harrison Brown June 30, 1966 Treasurer-L. V. Berkner June 30, 1964 Executive Officer Business Manager S. D. Cornell G. D. Meid COUNCIL *Berkner L. V. (1964) *Revelle, Roger (1965) *Brown, Harrison (1966) *Seitz, Frederick (1966) *Dryden, Hugh L. (1963) *Stratton, J. A. (1965) Hutchinson, G. Evelyn (1963) Williams, Robley C. (1963) *Kistiakowsky, G. B. (1964) Wood, W. Barry, Jr. (1965) Raper, Kenneth B. (1964) MEMBERS The number in parentheses, following year of election, indicates the Section to which the member belongs, as follows: (1) Mathematics (8) Zoology and Anatomy (2) Astronomy (9) Physiology (3) Physics (10) Pathology and Microbiology (4) Engineering (11) Anthropology (5) Chemistry (12) Psychology (6) Geology (13) Geophysics (7) Botany (14) Biochemistry Abbot, Charles Greeley, 1915 (2), Smithsonian Institution, Washington 25, D. C. Abelson, Philip Hauge, 1959 (6), Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 2801 Upton Street, N. W., Washington 8, D. C. Adams, Leason Heberling, 1943 (13), Institute of Geophysics, University of Cali- fornia, Los Angeles 24, California Adams, Roger, 1929 (5), Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois Ahlfors, Lars Valerian, 1953 (1), Department of Mathematics, Harvard University, 2 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge 38, Massachusetts Albert, Abraham Adrian, 1943 (1), 111 Eckhart Hall, University of Chicago, 1118 East 58th Street, Chicago 37, Illinois Albright, William Foxwell, 1955 (11), Oriental Seminary, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore 18, Maryland * Members of the Executive Committee of the Council of the Academy.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: the Rise of the Antinuclear Power Movement: 1957 to 1989
    Chapter 3 THE RISE OF THE ANTINUCLEAR POWER MOVEMENT 1957 TO 1989 In this chapter I trace the development and circulation of antinuclear struggles of the last 40 years. What we will see is a pattern of new sectors of the class (e.g., women, native Americans, and Labor) joining the movement over the course of that long cycle of struggles. Those new sectors would remain autonomous, which would clearly place the movement within the autonomist Marxist model. Furthermore, it is precisely the widening of the class composition that has made the antinuclear movement the most successful social movement of the 1970s and 1980s. Although that widening has been impressive, as we will see in chapter 5, it did not go far enough, leaving out certain sectors of the class. Since its beginnings in the 1950s, opposition to the civilian nuclear power program has gone through three distinct phases of one cycle of struggles.(1) Phase 1 —1957 to 1967— was a period marked by sporadic opposition to specific nuclear plants. Phase 2 —1968 to 1975— was a period marked by a concern for the environmental impact of nuclear power plants, which led to a critique of all aspects of nuclear power. Moreover, the legal and the political systems were widely used to achieve demands. And Phase 3 —1977 to the present— has been a period marked by the use of direct action and civil disobedience by protesters whose goals have been to shut down all nuclear power plants. 3.1 The First Phase of the Struggles: 1957 to 1967 Opposition to nuclear energy first emerged shortly after the atomic bomb was built.
    [Show full text]
  • The Commoner Issue 13 Winter 2008-2009
    In the beginning there is the doing, the social flow of human interaction and creativity, and the doing is imprisoned by the deed, and the deed wants to dominate the doing and life, and the doing is turned into work, and people into things. Thus the world is crazy, and revolts are also practices of hope. This journal is about living in a world in which the doing is separated from the deed, in which this separation is extended in an increasing numbers of spheres of life, in which the revolt about this separation is ubiquitous. It is not easy to keep deed and doing separated. Struggles are everywhere, because everywhere is the realm of the commoner, and the commoners have just a simple idea in mind: end the enclosures, end the separation between the deeds and the doers, the means of existence must be free for all! The Commoner Issue 13 Winter 2008-2009 Editor: Kolya Abramsky and Massimo De Angelis Print Design: James Lindenschmidt Cover Design: [email protected] Web Design: [email protected] www.thecommoner.org visit the editor's blog: www.thecommoner.org/blog Table Of Contents Introduction: Energy Crisis (Among Others) Is In The Air 1 Kolya Abramsky and Massimo De Angelis Fossil Fuels, Capitalism, And Class Struggle 15 Tom Keefer Energy And Labor In The World-Economy 23 Kolya Abramsky Open Letter On Climate Change: “Save The Planet From 45 Capitalism” Evo Morales A Discourse On Prophetic Method: Oil Crises And Political 53 Economy, Past And Future George Caffentzis Iraqi Oil Workers Movements: Spaces Of Transformation 73 And Transition
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Politics of Independence: the China Syndrome (1979)
    1 The Politics of Independence: The China Syndrome (1979), Hollywood Liberals and Antinuclear Campaigning Peter Krämer, University of East Anglia Abstract: This article draws, among other things, on press clippings files and scripts found in various archives to reconstruct the complex production history, the marketing and the critical reception of the nuclear thriller The China Syndrome (1979). It shows that with this project, several politically motivated filmmakers, most notably Jane Fonda, who starred in the film and whose company IPC Films produced it, managed to inject their antinuclear stance into Hollywood entertainment. Helped by the accident at the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant two weeks into the film’s release, The China Syndrome gained a high profile in public debates about nuclear energy in the U.S. Jane Fonda, together with her then husband Tom Hayden, a founding member of the 1960s “New Left” who had entered mainstream politics in the California Democratic Party by the late 1970s, complemented her involvement in the film with activities aimed at grass roots mobilisation against nuclear power. If the 1979 Columbia release The China Syndrome (James Bridges, 1979) is remembered today, it is mainly because of an astonishing coincidence. This thriller about an almost catastrophic accident at a nuclear power plant was released just twelve days before eerily similar events began to unfold at the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant near Harrisburg in Pennsylvania on 28 March 1979, resulting in, as the cover of J. Samuel Walker’s authoritative account of the event calls it, “the worst accident in the history of commercial nuclear power in the United States” (Walker).
    [Show full text]
  • EXTENSIONS of REMARKS 8463 Brenkworth Again Was Employed by the an Amendment by Mr
    April 24, 1979 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 8463 Brenkworth again was employed by the an amendment by Mr. KENNEDY, on serve of the Army and in the Army of the United States, under the provisions of title Commission until his appointment to which there is time limitation of 2 hours, 10, United States Code, sections 3019, 3442 the Disbursing Office on June 1, 1948. He after which Mr. TowER will call up his and 3447: advanced to chief bookkeeper in August amendment, on which there is a 1-hour To be major general, USAR and AUS of 1951 and subsequently became the as­ time limitation; subsequent to which Mr. sistant financial clerk on January 1, HATCH will be recognized to call up his Brig. Gen. William Roger Berkman, 559- 1953, a position he held until his ap­ five amendments, one at a time, of course, 32-4169. pointment as financial clerk on August with a time limitation on each of 1 hour. 23, 1954. Mr. President, as I say, the time limi­ CONFIRMATIONS He is survived by his wife, Elsie, and tations that I have set forth in this state­ Executive nominations confirmed by two children, Barbara and Lisa. ment may be reduced, either by consent the Senate April24, 1979: I am sure the Members of the Senate or by virtue of the parties in control DEPARTMENT OF STATE join me in expressing our condolences to thereof yielding some of the time back. John Prior Lewis, of New Jersey, for the his wife and to his children, and join me There may be other amendments around, rank of Minister during the tenure of his in saying that Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Civilian Nuclear Waste Disposal
    Civilian Nuclear Waste Disposal (name redacted) Specialist in Energy Policy January 11, 2016 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RL33461 Civilian Nuclear Waste Disposal Summary Management of civilian radioactive waste has posed difficult issues for Congress since the beginning of the nuclear power industry in the 1950s. Federal policy is based on the premise that nuclear waste can be disposed of safely, but proposed storage and disposal facilities have frequently been challenged on safety, health, and environmental grounds. Although civilian radioactive waste encompasses a wide range of materials, most of the current debate focuses on highly radioactive spent fuel from nuclear power plants. The United States currently has no disposal facility for spent nuclear fuel. The Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (NWPA) calls for disposal of spent nuclear fuel in a deep geologic repository. NWPA established the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) in the Department of Energy (DOE) to develop such a repository, which would be licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Amendments to NWPA in 1987 restricted DOE’s repository site studies to Yucca Mountain in Nevada. DOE submitted a license application for the proposed Yucca Mountain repository to NRC on June 3, 2008. The state of Nevada strongly opposes the Yucca Mountain project, citing excessive water infiltration, earthquakes, volcanoes, human intrusion, and other technical issues. The Obama Administration “has determined that developing the Yucca Mountain repository is not a workable option and the Nation needs a different solution for nuclear waste disposal,” according to the DOE FY2011 budget justification. As a result, no funding for Yucca Mountain, OCRWM, or NRC licensing was requested or provided for FY2011 or subsequent years.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Mile Island : a Nuclear Crisis in Historical Perspective Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    THREE MILE ISLAND : A NUCLEAR CRISIS IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK J. Samuel Walker | 314 pages | 28 Jan 2006 | University of California Press | 9780520246836 | English | Berkerley, United States Three Mile Island : A Nuclear Crisis in Historical Perspective PDF Book Friday, March "Going to Hell in a Handbasket" 7. Three Mile Island. Related articles in Google Scholar. Search Menu. Wednesday March 28 This Is the Biggie. This is the price excluding shipping and handling fees a seller has provided at which the same item, or one that is nearly identical to it, is being offered for sale or has been offered for sale in the recent past. The nuclear crisis at the Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in Fukushima, km from Tokyo, has been getting a lot of attention in the media lately but fears expressed for dangerous levels of radiation reaching areas further than 30km from the stricken nuclear facilities are unfounded and need to be put into perspective. See all 7 - All listings for this product. Berkeley, California. Sign up for email notifications and we'll let you know about new publications in your areas of interest when they're released. Prior accounts pale in comparison to this work. Arriving on the third day after the accident as the nrc on-site operative, only Harold Denton, whom President Jimmy Carter wisely designated his personal representative, emerged as a spokesman whose judgment all parties and the public trusted. Stock photo. The accident started early in the morning on March 28, The terrorist attacks of September 11, , for example, raised critical questions about the resilience and safety of nuclear power plants in the event of sabotage or attack.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc
    Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. 1725 I STREET, N,W. SUITE 600 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 202 223-8210 New Yorll. Offiu WesternOfJit:e 122 EAST 42ND STREET 25 KEARNY STREE.T NEW YORI<, N.Y. 10017 SAN FRANCISCO,CALIF. 94108 212 949-0°49 415 4U-6S61 Secrecy and Public Issues Related to Nuclear Power by Thomas B. Cochran A Paper Presented Before The American physical Society 1980 Spring Meeting Washington, D.C. April 30, 19BO •••• 75 l 00% Recycled Paper In 1954 atomic power first emerged from the wraps of military secrecy. Rather than a destroyer of-men, the peaceful uses of atomic energy would be a bountiful provider for social progress. There was already beginning public awareness of the dangers of radiation, and Congress recognized that development of this new power source could continue only if there was public acceptance. In the Atomic Energy Act, it was stated that: The dissemination of scientific and technical information relating to atomic energy should be permitted and encouraged so as to provide that free interchange of ideas and criticism which is essential to scientific and industrial progress and pUblic understanding and to enlarge the fund of technical information. IAtomic Energy Act of 1954, Sec. 141.b. j emphasi.s supplied. ] "The dissemination of infgrmation • • • to provide free interchange of ideas and criticism • essential to . • public understanding" ech'o-es"a~tenet of our society: clearly, in a-democratic society, an essential and minimum ingredient for meaningful exchange of ideas and criticism --for ~ aod ~~te is access by all parties to all relevant facts.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Rudd Brown
    RUDD BROWN (b. 1920) INTERVIEWED BY SHIRLEY K. COHEN January 31, 1995 Photo courtesy of Tom Apostol ARCHIVES CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California Subject area Geology, geochemistry, social sciences, United States Congress Abstract An interview on January 31, 1995, with Rudd Brown, on the subject of her former husband, Harrison Brown (1917-1986), who was a professor of geochemistry in the Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences at Caltech from 1951 to 1977, with a joint appointment in the Division of Humanities and Social Sciences as professor of science and government, from 1967. Among other policy positions, he was foreign secretary of the National Academy of Sciences from 1962 to 1974. In 1977, he left Caltech to become director of the Resource Systems Institute at the East-West Center, in Honolulu, remaining there until 1983. Brown came to Caltech from the University of Chicago, and was shortly followed there by several other Chicago geochemists, including Clair Patterson and Samuel Epstein. He and Rudd were married c. 1950 and divorced in 1975. In this interview, she outlines his family background and childhood in Sheridan, Wyoming, and San Francisco and his wartime work at Oak Ridge. She recalls their early life together at the University of Chicago after World War II and their subsequent years at Caltech, including its social life. She discusses his interest in the problems of overpopulation, resource sustainability, agricultural productivity, http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechOH:OH_Brown_R and East-West relations. She recalls his help in her political campaigns for Congress in 1958 and 1960 and concludes with recollections of his involvement with the Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions in the 1960s.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul Ehrlich Papers SC0223
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt3r29r8pf Online items available Guide to the Paul Ehrlich Papers SC0223 Daniel Hartwig Department of Special Collections and University Archives February 2019 Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford 94305-6064 [email protected] URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Note This encoded finding aid is compliant with Stanford EAD Best Practice Guidelines, Version 1.0. Guide to the Paul Ehrlich Papers SC0223 1 SC0223 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Title: Paul Ehrlich papers creator: Ehrlich, Paul R. creator: Ehrlich, Paul R. Identifier/Call Number: SC0223 Physical Description: 129.5 Linear Feet Date (inclusive): 1954-2001 Abstract: Correspondence, memos, notes, photographs, posters and other papers relating to Paul Ehrlich's publications and public appearances, his work with the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Jasper Ridge Biological Presrve (California), the Zero Population Growth organization, and the Stanford Biological Sciences Department. Correspondents include Norman Cousins, J. Gordon Edwards, Sol Encel, Erich Fromm, Jane Goodall, Daniel McKinley, Margaret Mead, Lawrence Lader, E. C. Pielou, Eliot Porter, and Jonas Salk. Collection also includes materials relating to Dr. Anne Ehrlich's biological research and videotape of Paul Ehrlich's appearance on the Tonight Show. Immediate Source of Acquisition note Gift of Paul R. and Anne Ehrlich, 1980-2001. Information about Access This collection is open for research. Ownership & Copyright All requests to reproduce, publish, quote from, or otherwise use collection materials must be submitted in writing to the Head of Special Collections and University Archives, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, California 94304-6064.
    [Show full text]