Virtual Drug Development Nowadays, It Would Seem That There Is No Aspect of Drug Development That Cannot Be “Virtualised” - with Varying Degrees of Success

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Virtual Drug Development Nowadays, It Would Seem That There Is No Aspect of Drug Development That Cannot Be “Virtualised” - with Varying Degrees of Success DRUG DEVELOPMENT Virtual drug development Nowadays, it would seem that there is no aspect of drug development that cannot be “virtualised” - with varying degrees of success. Dr John Hutchison, Vernalis The layman might be forgiven for associating the molecule, it is hoped that these techniques term “virtual” with computer-based technologies, will predict functional and other outcomes. as in “virtual reality”. Whilst this interpretation of Consequently, virtual techniques are marching the word has some relevance to pharmaceutical further and further down the screening cascade. R&D (particularly in research), in the context Two companies have made models available of drug development the term “virtual” has come which can simulate a drug’s metabolism and to describe a management philosophy rather than predict pharmacokinetics - namely the Camitro a new technology. Nonetheless, sophisticated Corporation and Navicyte, both based in computer-modelling techniques are making California. Simulations Plus Inc offers a product inroads into the process of R&D, so this is where which is believed to predict drug absorption from we will begin. the gastrointestinal tract, and a collaboration Virtual discovery and between scientists in the US, UK and New pre-clinical development Zealand has resulted in the creation of a virtual heart. It is claimed that this cardiac model can ... virtual The benefits of using “in silico” techniques for simulate certain pathological states and may be of techniques are compound screening in the drug discovery process value in predicting drug responsiveness in patients. are well established. The power of modelling Entelos PhysioLabs is also into commercialising marching arises from the ability to produce dynamic images disease models, having created simulations of further and of putative drugs and binding sites in a asthma, obesity and HIV, which they claim will further down three-dimensional form, whilst also factoring other reduce the failure rate in pharmaceutical R&D. influences such as surface charge. Huge numbers of Finally, the Physiome project (responsible for the the screening compounds contained within electronic libraries virtual heart) aims to create an entire virtual cascade can be screened for binding potential without the human body. Time will tell how predictive and bothersome task of actually making them. This has useful these models turn out to be, but it is clear greatly increased the speed and efficiency with that virtual technology - as it is understood by the which leads for conventional medicinal chemistry man on the street - will impact certain aspects of can be identified. This process is truly virtual in drug development and possibly improve our every sense of the word. decision-making in the early stages of a potential Beyond drug discovery, academic groups and drug’s life. others are also using virtual modelling techniques to recreate biological functions, including models Virtual development of enzymatic reactions, cellular responses and organ As indicated, “virtual development” embodies a function. In the same way that receptor modelling rather different concept and owes little to silicon might simulate the binding characteristics of a valley. In the context of drug development, the 94 Innovations in Pharmaceutical Technology DRUG DEVELOPMENT Figure 1. Three-dimensional representation of electrostatic surface potential (charge) of a potential drug. term “virtual” relates to the way the process is peaks and troughs. It is clear, therefore, that to set directed and managed, relying as it does on up a fully staffed “in-house” development group outsourcing. The choice of the word “virtual” to from scratch requires a huge investment, hundreds define this way of working is a bit misleading but, of staff and years of operation to become effective. emerging as it did in the early 1990s, was probably This is clearly never going to be a realistic prospect influenced as much by fashion as anything else. for a start-up company (although apparently it In the past, established pharmaceutical hasn’t stopped one or two from trying). Therefore, companies conducted most - if not all - of their if small companies are to engage in drug drug development in-house. Consequently, each development, a different approach is required. required the capability and infrastructure to Companies adopting a “virtual” approach work support all aspects of development including on the principle that operational tasks can be chemical development and primary manufacturing, contracted outside the company, whilst the analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, toxicology, strategic and project management functions are pharmaceutics and secondary manufacturing, retained within. This shortens the line of clinical development, regulatory affairs - and an command and provides a clearer delineation of array of support functions plus a management responsibility. In this pared-down environment, structure to control it all. Some large companies executive decisions may not be any more correct still operate exclusively in this way, although for but at least they stand a better chance of being most the trend is to use outsourcing to even out understood, acted upon and not constantly Innovations in Pharmaceutical Technology 95 DRUG DEVELOPMENT recycled through impenetrable layers of middle have also developed from small-scale beginnings managers. All the evidence points to a shortening into fully integrated pharma operations. of development time and cost. The extent to Looking at the more recent UK start-ups, which tasks are delegated outside varies between Vanguard Medica (now Vernalis) was one of the companies, but the outsourcing principle underlies first to identify itself as a “virtual development” the virtual development concept. To be effective, company, and for some time the phrase “Vanguard the “in-house team” has to be experienced Model” was used as a descriptor. Two new (functional head level in many cases) and the chemical entities (NCEs) have been approved in skill-base has to cover the full range of disciplines the last year or so, having been through the virtual engaged in development. development process - the anaesthetic chirocaine from Chiroscience (now part of Celltech Medeva) Factors influencing the growth of and frovatriptan from Vernalis. Consequently, the virtual development model is validated to the extent that it has delivered In the last decade or so, a number of forces have products and, in both cases, has done so more conspired to change the face of the pharmaceutical speedily than the industry average. However, as industry. R&D expenditure has increased whilst market conditions and investor sentiment have pricing and other regulations have squeezed changed during this decade, it is now unusual to To be effective, profitability, resulting in a wave of mergers, find small companies willing or able to undertake a the “in-house acquisitions and consolidations - a wave which full development through to registration. More continues with ever-larger players. This process often, small companies will undertake the earlier team” has to has had the effect, not surprisingly, of releasing stages (to so-called proof of principle in early be experienced experienced and talented industry personnel into patient studies, Phase IIa) and thenceforth seek partners for the more expensive later stages. ... and the the marketplace. Some have moved into contract research organisations (CROs), which initially Cambridge Antibody Technology (CAT) is an skill-base has sprang up in considerable numbers. Many of the example which has achieved success with its to cover the early CROs were focused on the provision of antibody-based platform technologies, and has a contract clinical research, but the market soon number of antibody products in development. Its full range of expanded to include other services such as contract development effort is directed at the early stages disciplines synthesis, analytical and preclinical functions, and (that is, up to Phase II ), whilst the more expensive engaged in in some cases sales and marketing. Phase III studies are conducted in collaboration Currently, there are few skills within the with partners. Whilst this is perhaps the norm, development industry that are not available in the contract there are some opportunities to take certain sector. At the same time, entrepreneurial research compounds all the way through, particularly for and development start-up companies were formed niche indications - as will be discussed later. in larger numbers, often based on ideas or Big pharma has experimented with the idea of technologies licensed from industry or from virtual development, as evidenced by Hoffman-La academic institutions. A symbiotic relationship Roche’s creation of Protodigm in 1996. Protodigm between early-stage pharma companies and employed only nine staff, representing one of contract organisations emerged - and thrives today the leanest of the virtual organisations, and with a number of operational alliances. Hence in demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of the virtual the 1990s, the environment was right for small principle during its life by improving development (in some cases very small) companies to take on times and reducing costs by approximately 25 development programmes which in the past would per cent compared with industry standards. have been the sole province of the pharmaceutical Protodigm now exists as an independent company, majors. To get some idea of the diversity of the
Recommended publications
  • Biotechnology and the Economics of Discovery in the Pharmaceutical Industry
    BIOTECHNOLOGY AND THE ECONOMICS OF DISCOVERY IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY HELEN SIMPSON Office of Health Economics 12 Whitehall London SWlA 2DY ©October 1998. Office of Health Economics. Price £7.50 ISBN 1 899040 60 9 Printed by BSC Print Ltd, London. About the Author Helen Simpson is currently a researc~ economist at the Institute for Fiscal Studies and was formerly an economist at the Department of Trade and Industry. However, the opinions expressed here are her own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IFS or of DTI officials or ministers. Acknowledgements This paper has been developed from my MPhil Economics thesis Scientist Entrepreneurs and the Finance of Biotech Companies. I would like to thank Margaret Meyer, Paul David and Gervas Huxley for their valuable suggestions. I am particularly grateful to Hannah Kettler and Jon Sussex for their advice and editorial inputs to the paper. My thanks also go to Adrian Towse and members of the OHE Editorial Board for their comments, and to the following individuals who gave me their insights into the pharmaceutical industry: Dr Trevor Jones, Director General, ABPI; Dr Janet Dewdney, Chairman, Adprotech; Dr Clive Halliday, Head of Global External Scientific Affairs, Glaxo Wellcome; Mr Alan Galloway, Head of Research Administration, Dr Nick Scott-Ram, Director of Corporate Affairs, and Dr Philip Huxley, all of British Biotech; Christine Soden, Finance Director, Chiroscience; Ian Smith, Lehman Brothers Pharmaceutical Research; and Paul Murray, 31. The Office of Health Economics Terms of Reference The Office of Health Economics (OHE) was founded in 1962. Its terms of reference are to: • commission and undertake research on the economics of health and health care; • collect and analyse health and health care data from the UK and other countries; • disseminate the results of this work and stimulate discussion of them and their policy implications.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme 10.00 Registration 10.20 Welcome from the Host
    Leadership Seminar: Respiratory and Inflammatory Diseases 22 September 2016 Penningtons Manches, 125 Wood Street, London EC2V 7AW Sponsored by Hosted by Programme 10.00 Registration 10.20 Welcome from the Host 10.30 Introduction Adrian Dawkes, PharmaVentures 10.45 Keynote presentations and discussion on unmet clinical needs including: 10.45 Symptoms vs Disease Modification Approach Lars Larson, TranScrip 11.05 Prospects for the prevention and treatment of respiratory virus-induced exacerbations in asthma and COPD Garth Rapeport, Pulmocide 11.25 Eosinophil depletion with benralizumab (anti-IL-5R) for the management of Severe Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Suzanne Cohen, MedImmune 11.45 Breath Biopsy - Breath Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) as Markers for Respiratory Disease Billy Boyle, Owlstone Medical 12.05 Panel discussion and Q&A 12.30 Lunch and networking 14.00 Data Protection and Liability in Respiratory Connected Devices Oliver Bett, Penningtons Manches 14.20 Adaptive Design in Respiratory Clinical Trials – A Sponsor’s Business Case Alethea Wieland, Scope International 14.40 Development of Immunoassays and Point-of-Care Tests for the Measurement of Active Protease Biomarkers of Chronic Respiratory Disease David Ribeiro, ProAxsis 15.00 Aiming for the Lungs - Formulation Strategies for Delivery of Inhaled Biologics Charlotte Yates, Vectura 15.30 Tea, coffee and networking 16.00 Innovative therapeutic options 16.00 The Development of an IL-17BR therapeutic antibody for the treatment of Asthma and IPF David Matthews, MRC Technology 16.20 Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Derived Peptide as a Disease Modifying Therapy for Asthma Nicky Cooper, Peptinnovate 16.40 Closing Remarks and Drinks Reception 18.00 Event closes Speaker Profiles Oliver Bett Associate, Penningtons Manches Oliver is an associate in our IP, IT and commercial team of Penningtons Manches, based in the London office.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Secondary Innovation on Firm Market Value in the Pharmaceutical Industry
    The Impact of Secondary Innovation on Firm Market Value in the Pharmaceutical Industry By: Maitri Punjabi Honors Thesis Economics Department The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill March 2016 Approved: ______________________________ Dr. Jonathan Williams Punjabi 2 Abstract This paper analyzes the effect of the changing nature of innovation on pharmaceutical firm market value from the years 1987 to 2010 by using U.S. patent and claim data. Over the years, firms have started shifting focus from primary innovation to secondary innovation as new ideas and new compounds become more difficult to generate. In this study, we analyze the impact of this patent portfolio shift on the market capitalization of pharmaceutical firms. After using firm fixed effects and the instrumental variable approach, we find that there exists a strong positive relationship between secondary innovations and the market value of the firm– in fact, we find a stronger relationship than is observed between primary innovation and market value. When focusing on the different levels of innovation within the industry, we find that this relationship is stronger for less-innovative firms (those that have produced fewer patents) than it is for highly- innovative firms. We also find that this relationship is stronger for firms that spend less on research and development, complementing earlier findings that research productivity is declining over time. Punjabi 3 Acknowledgements I would primarily like to thank my adviser, Dr. Jonathan Williams, for his patience and constant support. Without his kind and helpful attitude, this project would have been a much more frustrating process. Through his knowledge of the industry, I have gained valuable insight and have learned a great deal about a unique and growing field.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Securities and Exchange Commission Form 10-K Shire Pharmaceuticals Group
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ፤ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 អ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission file number 0-29630 SHIRE PHARMACEUTICALS GROUP PLC (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) England and Wales (State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer of incorporation or organization) Identification No.) N.A. East Anton, Andover, Hampshire SP10 5RG England (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) 44 1264 333455 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of exchange on which registered American Depository Shares, each representing Nasdaq National Market 3 Ordinary Shares, 5 pence nominal value per share Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None (Title of class) Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ፤ No អ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference to Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix One the CELLTECH CASE STUDY
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Mc Namara, P. (2000). Managing the tension between knowledge exploration and exploitation: the case of UK biotechnology. (Unpublished Doctoral thesis, City University London) This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/7870/ Link to published version: Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] Managing the Tension Between Knowledge Exploration and Exploitation: The Case of UK Biotechnology By Peter Mc Namara Presented in fulfilment of the requirements of the: Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Strategy and International Business City University Business School Department of Strategy and Marketing March 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SHIRE PLC (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission file number 0-29630 SHIRE PLC (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Jersey (Channel Islands) 98-0601486 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) organization) 5 Riverwalk, Citywest Business Campus, Dublin +353 1 429 7700 24, Republic of Ireland (Address of principal executive offices and zip code) (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of exchange on which registered American Depositary Shares, each representing three NASDAQ Global Select Market Ordinary Shares 5 pence par value per share Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None (Title of class) 1 Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act Yes [ ] No [X] Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) (Mark One) ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 or ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number: 001-33500 JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Ireland 98-1032470 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification incorporation or organization) No.) Fifth Floor, Waterloo Exchange Waterloo Road, Dublin 4, Ireland 011-353-1-634-7800 (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Name of each exchange on Title of each class which registered Ordinary shares, nominal The NASDAQ Stock Market value $0.0001 per share LLC Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Consolidation Revisited Is the Founder of Managing Resources, a Date Received *In Revised Form) 8Th October, 2001 Consultancy Focused on the Life Science Industries
    Alan Williams Consolidation revisited is the founder of Managing Resources, a Date received *in revised form) 8th October, 2001 consultancy focused on the life science industries. The Alan Williams company undertakes strategic assignments and also assists public and private sector clients with regulatory affairs, investor Abstract In 1998, the author produced two papers that argued that consolidation was relations and human a necessary activity for biotechnology companies to pay greater attention to. Three resources development. years later a further consideration of the subject seems worthwhile. Examples of Alan has also been an investment manager in successful consolidators are reviewed. a venture capital company, and held Keywords: consolidation, mergers, acquisitions marketing and licensing positions in Fisons. Introduction drink, vaccines and animal health but there is now greater focus on the highest In the early/mid-1970s, the pharmaceutical pro®tability sector, human pharmaceuticals. industry consisted of more than 100 At the time of writing, GSK is rumoured to research-based businesses of some be a possible purchaser of Bayer's signi®cant size, although none of them pharmaceutical business, the future of could convincingly claim a global presence. which has been questioned after the Typically, a leading company had a strong withdrawal of cerivastatin. position in its local market "examples Aventis, the eighth largest pharmaceutical included Merck and P®zer in the USA, company by sales in 2000,1 includes the Bayer in Germany, Beecham in the UK, operations of 1970s companies such as Roussel-Uclaf in France and Fujisawa in Rhone-Poulenc, Rorer, Fisons, Hoechst, Japan) and possibly some other Marion, Richardson Merrell, and some neighbouring countries "US companies in smaller companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Ftc Actions in Pharmaceutical Products and Distribution*
    OVERVIEW OF FTC ACTIONS IN PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS AND DISTRIBUTION* Health Care Division Bureau of Competition Federal Trade Commission Washington D.C. 20580 Markus H. Meier Assistant Director Bradley S. Albert Deputy Assistant Director Kara Monahan Deputy Assistant Director September 2019 * Actions involving health care services and products are contained in a separate document, Overview of FTC Actions in Health Care Services and Products. Information about advisory opinions in the health care and pharmaceutical sectors is contained in the document Topic and Yearly Indices of Health Care Antitrust Advisory Opinions by Commission and by Staff. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 II. CONDUCT INVOLVING PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS .......................................3 A. Monopolization ........................................................................................................3 B. Agreements Not to Compete ..................................................................................14 III. CONDUCT INVOLVING PHARMACEUTICAL DISTRIBUTION ..............................20 A. Monopolization ......................................................................................................20 B. Agreements on Price and Price-Related Terms .....................................................20 C. Agreements to Obstruct Innovative Forms of Health Care Delivery or Financing................................................................................................................27
    [Show full text]
  • Shire: a Focused Global Pharmaceutical Company Focusing on a Bright Future Shire Pharmaceuticals Group Plc the Shire Mission
    Shire Pharmaceuticals Group plc Annual review and summary financial statement 2003 Shire: a focused global pharmaceutical company Focusing on a bright future Shire Pharmaceuticals Group plc The Shire mission Our mission is to become the leading company in meeting the needs of the specialist physician. We want to achieve this by developing and Contents 01 Financial highlights marketing products of the highest quality 02 Chairman’s statement 04 Chief Executive Officer’s review for the treatment of serious diseases, 06 Product portfolio 07 Product development pipeline which are treated by medical specialists. 08 Operating review 22 CSR: Corporate and social responsibility 24 Financial review We aim to provide high quality and effective 28 Board of Directors 30 The Executive Committee products that enhance the health and 32 Directors’ remuneration report 44 Corporate governance quality of life of people around the world statement Financial Statements and contribute to the long-term business 48 Statement of Directors’ responsibilities – Report of success of our Company, to the benefit independent auditors 49 Consolidated balance sheets 50 Consolidated statement of all our stakeholders. of operations 51 Consolidated statements of changes in shareholders’ equity We are driven by the needs of all our 52 Consolidated statements of cash flows stakeholders: patients, their families and 53 Notes to the consolidated financial statements 87 Five-year review caregivers, doctors and medical specialists, 88 Summary financial statement 93 Notes to summary employees and partner companies, the financial statement community in which we live and work and, Other 94 Shire head office and main operating locations of course, our shareholders.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) [ X ] Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 OR Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the Transition Period from ________ to ________ For the fiscal year ended Commission File number 0-50626 December 31, 2005 CYCLACEL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 91-1707622 (State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer of incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 150 John F. Kennedy Parkway, Suite 100 Short Hills, NJ 07078 (Address of principal executive office) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (732) 225-8910 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share 6% Convertible Exchangeable Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share (Title of class) Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports required to be filed by Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Case No COMP/M.1846 - GLAXO WELLCOME / SMITHKLINE BEECHAM
    EN Case No COMP/M.1846 - GLAXO WELLCOME / SMITHKLINE BEECHAM Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 08/05/2000 Also available in the CELEX database Document No 300M1846 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 08.05.2000 In the published version of this decision, some PUBLIC VERSION information has been omitted pursuant to Article 17(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 concerning non-disclosure of business secrets and MERGER PROCEDURE other confidential information. The omissions are ARTICLE 6(2) DECISION shown thus […]. Where possible the information omitted has been replaced by ranges of figures or a general description. To the notifying parties Dear Sirs, Subject: Case No COMP/M.1846-GLAXO WELLCOME/SMITHKLINE BEECHAM Notification of 20.3.2000 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation No 4064/89 1 1. On 20 March 2000, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (“the Merger Regulation”) by which the undertaking Glaxo Wellcome plc (“GW”) and SmithKline Beecham plc (“SB”) notified their intention to enter into a full merger within the meaning of Article 3(1)a of the Merger Regulation. The merger was announced on 17 January 2000. 2. In the course of the proceedings, the parties submitted undertakings designed to eliminate competition concerns identified by the Commission, in accordance with Article 6(2) of the Merger Regulation. In the light of these modifications, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation as amended and does not raise serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market and with the functioning of the EEA Agreement.
    [Show full text]