A Historical Narrative of Traditional Lands Around the Newmont Sabajo Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Historical Narrative of Traditional Lands Around the Newmont Sabajo Project A Historical Narrative of Traditional Lands around the Newmont Sabajo Project Baseline Study for the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of the Sabajo Expansion of the Merian Gold Mine in Suriname Marie-Josee Artist & Florence Rijsdijk Commissioned by Newmont Suriname A Historical Narrative of Traditional Lands around the Newmont Sabajo Project Baseline for the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of the Sabajo Expansion of the Merian Gold Mine in Suriname Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this report are strictly those from the interviewed representatives of the communities. The findings and conclusions or recommendations are based on the information gathered from desktop study and interviews. The authors are not responsible for the opinions expressed by interviewees. Marie-Josee Artist & Florence Rijsdijk Commissioned by Newmont Suriname HISTORICAL NARRATIVE OF THE TRADITONAL LANDS AROUND THE NEWMONT SABAJO PROJECT CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS ..................................................................................................................................................... I ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ................................................................................................................................... II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................III 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. OBJECTIVES, STRATEGY AND MAIN TASKS OF STUDY ........................................................................................... 1 1.2. METHODOLOGY AND DESIGN ........................................................................................................................ 2 1.3. STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT AND PROJECT-STAFFING ......................................................................................... 9 2. INTERNATIONAL LAW ON DETERMINATION, OCCUPATION AND USE OF TRADITIONAL LAND .............. 10 2.1. LAND, TERRITORY AND RESOURCES .............................................................................................................. 10 2.2. INDIGENOUS AND TRIBAL PEOPLES RIGHTS .................................................................................................... 11 2.3. COLLECTIVE RIGHTS .................................................................................................................................. 12 2.4. RELEVANCE TO DETERMINING LAND RIGHTS ................................................................................................... 12 3. HISTORY OF THE PEOPLE AND TERRITORY ............................................................................................. 14 3.1. WRITTEN HISTORY OF MAROONS ................................................................................................................ 14 3.1.2. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 17 3.2. THE NDYUKA FROM THE COMMEWIJNE RIVER AREA ........................................................................................ 17 3.2.1. Written history .......................................................................................................................... 19 3.2.2. Oral history ............................................................................................................................... 19 3.2.3. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................. 29 3.3. THE SAAMAKA COMMUNITIES FROM THE AFOBAKA ROAD AREA ........................................................................ 30 3.3.1. Written and oral history ........................................................................................................... 30 3.3.2. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 31 3.4. THE PAAMAKA COMMUNITIES .................................................................................................................... 31 3.4.1. Written and oral history ........................................................................................................... 31 3.4.2. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................. 32 4. TRADITIONAL LAND USE AREA .............................................................................................................. 33 4.1. THE KAWINA PEOPLE ................................................................................................................................ 33 4.1.1. Traditional land ........................................................................................................................ 33 4.1.2. Land-use conflicts and conflict resolution ................................................................................ 36 4.1.3. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 38 4.2. THE SAAMAKA/SAAKIIKI PEOPLE ................................................................................................................. 39 4.2.1. Traditional Land ....................................................................................................................... 39 4.2.2. Land-use conflicts ..................................................................................................................... 40 4.2.3. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 41 4.3. THE PAAMAKA PEOPLE .............................................................................................................................. 41 4.3.1. Traditional land ........................................................................................................................ 41 4.3.2. Land-use conflicts ..................................................................................................................... 42 4.3.3. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 43 5. TRADITIONAL SOCIAL STRUCTURES & CUSTOMS AND MEANS OF LIVELIHOOD ..................................... 44 March 2018 HISTORICAL NARRATIVE OF THE TRADITONAL LANDS AROUND THE NEWMONT SABAJO PROJECT CONTENTS 5.1. KINSHIP AND LINEAGE SYSTEM .................................................................................................................... 44 5.2. SOCIAL LIFE AND CUSTOMS ......................................................................................................................... 46 5.3. TRADITIONAL LIVELIHOOD ACTIVITIES............................................................................................................ 47 5.4. INTANGIBLE HERITAGE .............................................................................................................................. 48 5.5. CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................................... 52 6. GOVERNANCE STRUCTURES, DECISION MAKING AND LAW................................................................... 53 6.1. TRADITIONAL GOVERNING SYSTEM AND LEADERSHIP ........................................................................................ 53 6.2. CHANGES IN GOVERNING SYSTEM, LEGITIMACY AND CONDUCT .......................................................................... 54 6.3. THE ROLE OF WOMEN ............................................................................................................................... 56 6.4. DECISION-MAKING AND NEGOTIATION .......................................................................................................... 57 6.4.1. Decisions about land use .......................................................................................................... 57 6.4.2. Distribution of benefits ............................................................................................................. 59 6.5. COMMUNICATION .................................................................................................................................... 60 6.6. CONCLUSION ON TRADITIONAL PROTOCOLS ................................................................................................... 60 7. DISCUSSION OVER COMPANY LAND USE AND ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY .............................................. 61 7.1. ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY ........................................................................................................................... 61 7.2. CAPACITY OF THE TRIBE TO ENGAGE IN NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE COMPANY ......................................................... 61 7.3. CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................................... 63 8. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................ 64 ANNEXES ......................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Aardrijkskundige Beschrijving
    BEKNOPTE AARDRIJKSKUNDIGE BESCHRIJVING VAN SURINAME door W. L. LOTH, Gouvernements landmeter in Suriname. JVlK'r J_A._VI_T VAN I*A.Ï_A.]M__Rl__o. AMSTERDAM. — J. 11. de BUSSY. — 1898. BEKNOPTE AARDRIJKSKUNDIGE BESCHRIJVING VAN SURINAME DOOR W. L. LOTH, Gouvernement* lamimeter in Suriname, MKÏ KAART VAN PAKAMARIBO. AMSTERDAM. - J. H. DE BUSSY. — 1898. INHOUD. Blz. 1". llgging, gbenzen, omtbek .' 5 2°. Hoogte . 5 3°. Laagland, Savanna, Hoogland 6 •4". Klimaat 7 s°. Middelen van veekeer 7 6". Namen dee districten en kunne geenzen. 15 7°. Voortbrengselen 19 B°. Bevolking 20 9°. Beschrijving der districten 21 I°. Ligging, grenzen, omtrek. De Kolonie Suriname, gelegen aan de noordkust van Zuid-Amerika, tusschen 51° en 58° "Westerlengte van Green- wich en 2° en 6° Noorderbreedte, beslaat eene oppervlakte van vijftien millioen Hectaren (150000 K. Ms . of 2784 □ G. mijlen). Zij grenst ten Noorden aan den Atlantischen Oceaan, ten Oosten aan Fransen Guyana (Cayenne), ten Zuiden aan Brazilië en ten Westen aan Engelsch Guyana (Demerara). De oostelijke grens loopt over de rivier de Marowijne, de zuidelijke over het Tumuchumac- en het Acarai-gebergte en de westelijke over de rivier de Corantijn. Slechts ongeveer een derde deel van bovengenoemde opper- vlakte der Kolonie is doorreizigers bezocht; van het overige deel is niets bekend. 2°. Hoogte. Over eene geschatte breedte van 50 K. M. is het noorde- lijk deel van Suriname bijna geheel vlak en ligt het ter hoogte van het peil van gewoon hoog water en dus beneden het peil der springvloeden. Dit lage deel wordt ten Zuidenbegrensd door eene kromme lijn, loopende van de Marowijne ter hoogte van de Wane- 6 kreek in W.
    [Show full text]
  • PLANTAGES LANGS DE BOVEN SURINAME Totaal 1320 Slaven
    PLANTAGES LANGS DE BOVEN SURINAME totaal 1320 slaven 1 VICTORIA 47 slaven Houtgrond aan de Suriname links in het afvaren; grenzend stroomopwaarts aan de militaire post Victoria, stroomafwaarts aan de mond van de Compagniekreek. Eigenaar J.J.B. de Mesquita uit Paramaribo. Albion Braaf Chuitames Everta Wilesia Banel Buenos Daluis Lila 2 BERG EN DAL 318 slaven (ST: Bergi1), houtgrond aan de Suriname rechts in het opvaren, aan de Toetayakreek en aan de voet van de Blauweberg, ook de Parnassusberg genoemd; grenzend opwaarts aan de houtgrond Karelswoud en stroomafwaarts aan de mond van de Polloniekreek. Eigenaren Rothuys, de erven Baron de Lindau, Muller, Sanches, de Meij, allen uit Europa. Assat Erat Keeldar Pera Sympson Auterbach Farren Kobbel Peterhof Tensch Bartel Faveur Koharij Poedelkap Trolle Beukenhout Freya Koning- Proeger Tumus Bifrost Goozen verdraag Prijor Udorpho Blonowski Graville Koningvri Quovilar Ulm Bolieu Gregoor Lamp Rasper Valet Boudorfer Groté Lapuchin Rottenburg Vanbelli Brodki Hartley Lauderbroek Scherley Vandams Bronners Heimdal Lemberg Scholer Vermeer Bugmair Helmig Macarthey Schoppe Vermicel Chaudio Helstone Malone Schott Walden Curintha Herrenberg Marem Seedorf Wladislaw Danarag Hierst Meltior Siktis Wondel Delcharwin Hirschaw Mink Sloos Woudman Demidaf Hofstede Molach Sluis, van Yockel Demitri Hongerbron Moreaus Staufer Yorks Deugd Horb Moskow Stutgart Domas Hortens Muringen Sugden Drakenstein Hurtak Nunnely Sweeting Duim, van Jorden Olenski Sykes 3 REMONCOURT 6 slaven Houtgrond aan de Suriname rechts in het afvaren; grenzend stroomopwaarts aan de houtgrond Berg-en- Daal, stroomafwaarts aan de houtgrond Solitaire. De eigenares van deze plantage was mej. S.D. Sanches. De plantage Remoncourt had geen eigen slaven. De zes slaven die er werkten, behoorden toe aan de plantage Cornelis Vriendschap (aan de Orleanekreek) waarvan mej.
    [Show full text]
  • Structuur Analyse Districten 2009-2013
    STRUCTUUR ANALYSE DISTRICTEN 2009-2013 STICHTING PLANBUREAU SURINAME December 2014 Structuuranalyse Districten IV Ruimtelijke ontwikkeling van de districten INHOUDSOPGAVE Ten geleide ................................................................................................................ ii Colofon ..................................................................................................................... iii Afkortingen ............................................................................................................... iv I DEMOGRAFISCHE ANALYSE Demografische analyse ......................................................................................... D-1 II RUIMTELIJKE ONTWIKKELING VAN DE DISTRICTEN 1. Paramaribo .................................................................................................. S-1 2. Wanica ...................................................................................................... S-22 3. Nickerie ..................................................................................................... S-38 4. Coronie ...................................................................................................... S-60 5. Saramacca ................................................................................................ S-72 6. Commewijne .............................................................................................. S-90 7. Marowijne ................................................................................................ S-109
    [Show full text]
  • The Marine Mollusca of Suriname (Dutch Guiana) Holocene and Recent
    THE MARINE MOLLUSCA OF SURINAME (DUTCH GUIANA) HOLOCENE AND RECENT Part II. BIVALVIA AND SCAPHOPODA by G. O. VAN REGTEREN ALTENA Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden "The student must know something of syste- matic work. This is populary supposed to be a dry-as-dust branch of zoology. In fact, the systematist may be called the dustman of biol- ogy, for he performs a laborious and frequently thankless task for his fellows, and yet it is one which is essential for their well-being and progress". Maud D. Haviland in: Forest, steppe and tundra, 1926. CONTENTS Ι. Introduction, systematic survey and page references 3 2. Bivalvia and Scaphopoda 7 3. References 86 4. List of corrections of Part I 93 5. Plates 94 6. Addendum 100 1. INTRODUCTION, SYSTEMATIC SURVEY AND PAGE REFERENCES In the first part of this work, published in 1969, I gave a general intro- duction to the Suriname marine Mollusca ; in this second part the Bivalvia and Scaphopoda are treated. The system (and frequently also the nomen- clature) of the Bivalvia are those employed in the "Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, (N) Mollusca 6, Part I, Bivalvia, Volume 1 and 2". These volumes were issued in 1969 and contain the most modern system of the Bivalvia. For the Scaphopoda the system of Thiele (1935) is used. Since I published in 1968 a preliminary list of the marine Bivalvia of Suriname, several additions and changes have been made. I am indebted to Messrs. D. J. Green, R. H. Hill and P. G. E. F. Augustinus for having provided many new coastal records for several species.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Conservation in South America Challenges and Solutions Organized by World Monuments Fund
    Heritage Conservation in South America Challenges and Solutions Organized by World Monuments Fund Conference Abstracts São Paulo, Brazil April 11–14, 2002 contents Opening Remarks 3 Hernan Crespo Toral, Ecuador Session I: Considerations for Identifying & Prioritizing Heritage Sites for Conservation 5 Criteria for World Heritage Listing: How to Achieve a Representative and Credible World Heritage Site, Herman Van Hooff, UNESCO 6 Modern Heritage in Latin America, Hugo Segawa, DOCOMOMO 7Protected Urban Sites and the “Urbis” Program, Carlos Henrique Heck, IPHAN President 9World Monuments Watch Program, John Stubbs, WMF 11 ICOMOS, Initiatives on Heritage at Risk, Dinu Bumbaru, ICOMOS Canada Representative Session II: Advocacy and Public Awareness on Heritage Conservation and Develop- ment—Conservation in Action 15 The Wooden Churches of Chiloe, Chile: The Constant Challenge of Conservation, Hernan Montecinos, “Fundación Amigos de Las Iglesias de Chiloé” 16 Machu Picchu: Heritage Ideals Vis à Vis Democratic Aspirations, Mariana Mould de Pease, Peru 17 Suriname’s Jewish Historic Sites at Jodensavanne and Paramaribo, Rachel Frankel, USA 19 Elevators of Valparaiso: The Value of a Forgotten Patrimony, Jaime Migone, CONPAL 20 Destruction and Preservation of Rock Art Sites in Bolivia, Matthias Strecker, SIARB Session III: From Theory to Practice in Architectural Conservation 22 Peru, Los Pinchudos: Emergency Conservation Project in the Rain Forest, Ricardo Morales Gamarra 24 Conservation Theory and Practice: Shall the Twain Ever Meet?, A. Elena Charola
    [Show full text]
  • Zoologische Mededelingen Uitgegeven Door Het
    ZOOLOGISCHE MEDEDELINGEN UITGEGEVEN DOOR HET RIJKSMUSEUM VAN NATUURLIJKE HISTORIE TE LEIDEN (MINISTERIE VAN CULTUUR, RECREATIE EN MAATSCHAPPELIJK WERK) Deel 48 no. 8 16 mei 1974 THE LAND PROSOBRANCHIA OF SURINAME WITH THE DESCRIPTION OF TWO NEW SPECIES OF NEOCYCLOTUS by C. O. VAN REGTEREN ALTENA Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie With 3 plates Vernhout (1914) was the first to publish an account of the land and fresh- water Mollusca of Suriname. In this publication he assembled not only the older literature in which species were mentioned from Suriname, but also he named the Mollusca collected by seven expeditions and some travellers, and included in his paper the material which W. C. van Heurn collected during his trip in 1911. So he laid a sound basis for future investigations. In the present paper only the land Prosobranchia are treated. On this matter, so far as I know, only one paper has been published since 1914. This paper (Altena, 1960) mentioned Lucidella lirata (Pfeiffer) from Tamba- redjo and Sidoredjo in the Saramacca district. The Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie received specimens from Suri- name from many persons to whom I am much indebted for their cooperation. Thanks are also due to Mr. H. E. Coomans who sent me the specimens on loan, which were collected in 1926 by D. L. Fernandes. Here follows a list which mentions in chronological sequence the collectors with the months and the years in which they collected, together with the abbreviations under which they are mentioned in the text. F : D. L. Fernandes, Wilhelmina Gebergte Expedition, VII-VIII 1926 (for the route, see: Tijdschr.
    [Show full text]
  • French Reaction to the Menace from Cabanos and Bonis Within the Litigious Territory Between Brazil and French Guiana (1836-1841)1
    125 French reaction to the menace from Cabanos and Bonis within the litigious territory between Brazil and French Guiana (1836-1841)1 Reação francesa às ameaças de Cabanos e Bonis no território litigioso do Amapá (1836-1841) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2236-463320161408 Débora Bendocchi Alves Instituto de História Ibérica e Latinoamericana (IHILA) Faculdade de História da Universidade de Colônia, Colônia, Alemanha [email protected] Abstract: This article will analyze an historical episode that occurred between 1836 and 1841 during the French occupation of the disputed territory located between Brazil and French Guiana. I intend to consider two regional factors that influenced the decision of both the Cayenne Government and the metropolitan government to build military forts in the region. Such factors are the Cabanagem and the attempts of black Bonis to settle in Lower Oiapoque. I will go on to show that the French withdrawal from Amapá Lake in 1840, but not from the post on the right bank of the Oiapoque River, was due not only to international and diplomatic factors but also had regional causes. Notwithstanding the French government's interests in expanding the territory of its South American colony, I want to draw attention to the threats - real or fictitious - of Cabanos, from Brazil, and black Bonis, from Dutch Guiana. 1 This article forms part of a research project funded by Gerda Henkel Foundation (Germany) about the region of the French-Brazilian Boarding between 1840-1900. It is a revised and extended version of my participation at the ANPUH 2015 XXVIII National History Symposium, held in Florianópolis.
    [Show full text]
  • Is There Gold in All That Glitters? Indigenous Peoples and Mining in Suriname
    Is There Gold In All That Glitters? Indigenous Peoples and Mining in Suriname Prepared for a project funded by the Inter-American Development Bank’s Canadian Technical Assistance Program (CANTAP) funding By Bente Molenaar The North-South Institute November 1, 2007 The North-South Institute (NSI) is a charitable corporation established in 1976 to provide profession- al, policy-relevant research on relations between industrialized and developing countries. The results of this research are made available to policy-makers, interested groups, and the general public to help generate greater understanding and informed discussion of development questions. The Institute is independent and cooperates with a wide range of Canadian and international organizations working in related activities. The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect views held by the Inter-American Development Bank or The North-South Institute. Omissions and mistakes are entirely the responsibility of the author. Corrections and comments can be sent to [email protected]. The draft of this report was completed November 1, 2007. Available at: www.nsi-ins.ca Layout and design: Marcelo Saavedra-Vargas ([email protected]) Photo Credit: Viviane Weitzner The North-South Institute Association of Indigenous L’Institut Nord-Sud Village Leaders in Suriname © The Inter-American Development Bank, 2008. IND I GENOUS PEO P LES AND MI N I NG I N SUR I NA M E Table of Contents Abbreviations and acronyms. ii Acknowledgements. .1 Executive summary. .2 Introduction . .3 1. Setting the scene: a brief overview of the actors, history, country information and politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Participatory Mapping in Lands of Indigenous Peoples and Maroons in Suriname
    SUPPORT FOR THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INTERIOR -COLLECTIVE RIGHTS PARTICIPATORY MAPPING IN LANDS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND MAROONS IN SURINAME FINAL SUMMARY REPORT December 2010 THE AMAZON CONSERVATION TEAM Doekhieweg Oost 24, PARAMARIBO , SURINAME , PH: (597) 568606 FAX: (597) 6850169. EMAIL: [email protected] . WEB: WWW.ACT-SURINAME.ORG TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS………………………………………………………………………………………… 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY………………………………………………………………………………………….. 4 1. INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………………………. 6 2. METHODOLOGY…………………………………………………………………………………… 9 3. COMMUNITY MAPPING PROCESS IN THE INTERIOR OF SURINAME.………………….. 14 3.1 THE INTERIOR AND ITS TRIBAL COMMUNITIES…………………………………………. 14 3.2 TRIBAL MAPPING PROCESSES…………………………………………………………….. 18 3.3 CHALLENGES IN THE COMMUNITY MAPPING PROCESS.…………………………….. 30 3.4 VERIFICATION OF FIELD DATA…………………………………………………………….. 32 3.5 GIS PROCESSING OF FIELD DATA INTO ONE MAP……………………………………… 33 REFERENCES…………….……………………………………………………………………………………… 35 ANNEX 1: ACT TRAINING MANUAL FOR GPS USE AND DATA TRANSFER….………….. 36 ANNEX 2: EXAMPLE OF COMMUNITY WORKSHOP RESULT…………………… …………. 37 ANNEX 3: ACT VERIFICATION MANUAL FOR COMMUNITY MAPPING………………….. 38 ANNEX 4: MAPPING EXPEDITIONS………………………………………………… …………. 39 ANNEX 5: VERIFICATION ROUNDS IN COMMUNITIES………………………………………. 40 ANNEX 6: COMMUNITY MAPPING PARTICIPANTS……………………………… …………. 41 ANNEX 7: TEAM OF CONSULTANTS…………………………………………………………… 47 ANNEX 8: TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE ASSIGNMENT…………………………………. 48 ANNEX 9: MEMORANDUM ACT‐GLIS………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Translation
    Chapter 5 Notes on the Translation For the first time, the Verslag van drie reizen naar de Bovenlandsche Indianen has been translated into English. This is Lodewijk Schmidt’s account of three expeditions conducted between October 1940 and April 1942, on and beyond the southern borders of Suriname. The original accounts were edited by Gerold Stahel, a Swiss botanist specialized in tropical plant diseases, who in 1919 had been appointed head of the agricultural experiment station in Suriname, De- partment of Agriculture. To start with, the original title provides some issues for the translator: how to translate the key words “reizen” and “Bovenlandsche Indianen”? Why did Stahel not use the term “expeditie” as this appears to have been an expedition? The concept Bovenlandsche Indianen, as explained in de- tail earlier, is a typical Surinamese concept to refer to the Indigenous Peoples of south Suriname, yet it implies a colonial notion of Indigenous Peoples with a lower level of “civilization”. While Schmidt frequently used the present or praesens historicum, it was decided to use the past tense for the present transla- tion. The translations of Schmidt’s accounts of the three expeditions are kept in the first person singular. Schmidt was born and raised in Suriname, and also Stahel had resided several decades in Suriname, which resulted in the fact that many typical Suri- namese terms and concepts, such as soela, korjaal, and kwatta, remained un- translated in the running text of the 1942 publication. These terms and concepts, as well as the geographical names well-known to the residents of Suriname, have been kept in the running text of the present work, yet have been set in ital- ics and annotated and explained in this Notes on the translation.
    [Show full text]
  • Saramaka Maroons on the Brazilian Frontier Richard Price College Of
    Saramaka Maroons on the Brazilian Frontier Richard Price College of William and Mary, Virginia, USA, and Anse Chaudière, Martinique Maroons in the Americas have always been champions at seizing the moment, whether in battles against their colonial enemies or in carving out imaginative economic niches in more recent times. This essay focuses on Maroon men from central Suriname who, in the second half of the nineteenth century, migrated to French Guiana where they monopolized the river transport system that supplied thousands of non-Maroon goldminers in that colony and, in the process, created a new of way of life for themselves and their descendants. The Oyapok region of French Guiana, which borders the Brazilian state of Amapá, might best be considered the distant frontier of a distant frontier B many thousands of kilometers from the metropolitan political center of Paris, many hundreds through the forest from the colonial capital of Cayenne, and, from the perspective of the Saramaka Maroons of central Suriname, at the farthest edge of the known geographical universe. In 1900, the mayor of the Commune de l=Oyapok gave the total population as 304. (He did not include members of the Aindigenous tribes of autochthonous or African origin living in the region@ which, according to a 1901 document, lived there Aunder the administrative protection of the customs service.@) Despite plans on the drawing board in 2002 for a bridge between St.- Georges-de-l'Oyapok and the Brazilian town of Oiapoque and for a road between St.- Georges-de-l'Oyapok and Cayenne (which would in theory permit direct road travel between, say, Macapá and Cayenne) the region has long remained a backwater B in 1971, for example, the largest town in the region, St-Georges-de-l'Oyapok, boasted only two cars.1 By 1900, when Saramaka Maroon migrants from Suriname (the main Atribe .
    [Show full text]
  • A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Upper Palumeu River Watershed (Grensgebergte and Kasikasima) of Southeastern Suriname
    Rapid Assessment Program A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Upper Palumeu River Watershed (Grensgebergte and Kasikasima) of Southeastern Suriname Editors: Leeanne E. Alonso and Trond H. Larsen 67 CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL - SURINAME CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL GLOBAL WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ANTON DE KOM UNIVERSITY OF SURINAME THE SURINAME FOREST SERVICE (LBB) NATURE CONSERVATION DIVISION (NB) FOUNDATION FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION CONTROL (SBB) SURINAME CONSERVATION FOUNDATION THE HARBERS FAMILY FOUNDATION Rapid Assessment Program A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Upper Palumeu River Watershed RAP (Grensgebergte and Kasikasima) of Southeastern Suriname Bulletin of Biological Assessment 67 Editors: Leeanne E. Alonso and Trond H. Larsen CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL - SURINAME CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL GLOBAL WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ANTON DE KOM UNIVERSITY OF SURINAME THE SURINAME FOREST SERVICE (LBB) NATURE CONSERVATION DIVISION (NB) FOUNDATION FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION CONTROL (SBB) SURINAME CONSERVATION FOUNDATION THE HARBERS FAMILY FOUNDATION The RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment is published by: Conservation International 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 500 Arlington, VA USA 22202 Tel : +1 703-341-2400 www.conservation.org Cover photos: The RAP team surveyed the Grensgebergte Mountains and Upper Palumeu Watershed, as well as the Middle Palumeu River and Kasikasima Mountains visible here. Freshwater resources originating here are vital for all of Suriname. (T. Larsen) Glass frogs (Hyalinobatrachium cf. taylori) lay their
    [Show full text]