Indonesia: Final Report, Legislative Elections, ANFREL

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Indonesia: Final Report, Legislative Elections, ANFREL Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL) INDONESIAN MISSION 2004 INDONESIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY ELECTION PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 2004 Report of International Observation Mission February – September 2004 Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL / Forum - Asia) Rights Democracy, Canada KIOS - The Finnish NGO Foundation for Human Rights 1 Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL) INDONESIAN MISSION 2004 Published by Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL) and Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA) 111 Suthisarnwinichai Road Samsennok, Huaykwang Bangkok 10320, Thailand Tel : (66 2) 276 9846 –7 Fax : (66 2) 693 4939, 276 2183 E-mail : [email protected] Website : www.anfrel.org Written by Maiko Shimizu Herizal Hazri Edited by Herizal Hazri Layouted by Chatchawan Rakchat Photos courtesy of mission observers and staffs. Book cover designed by Pongsak Chan-on ISBN Printed in Bangkok, Thailand December 2004 2 Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL) INDONESIAN MISSION 2004 Acknowledgement ANFREL wishes to express its heartfelt thanks to The Finish NGO Foundation for Human Rights (KIOS) and International Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Development (ICHRDD) from Canada for their unwavering support in realizing ANFREL’s efforts to support the democratization process during the Indonesian Legislative and Presidential Elections 2004. ANFREL would also like to extend its appreciation to the Central Election Commission (KPU) for its accreditation to ANFREL as an official International Observation Mission and its kindest attention and support to allow all ANFREL observers to study and make recommendations to the electoral processes in Indonesia. It is also undoubtedly a great experience for ANFREL to learn about the electoral monitoring body called PANWASLU. ANFREL is very grateful with the positive working relations that it enjoys with the body especially in sharing useful information and case studies on the electoral processes. In addition, we also would like to thank all ANFREL observers and Indonesia’s local monitoring organizations, especially the Independent Committee for Election Monitoring in Indonesia (KIPP), in acting as ANFREL’s local partner and for all the efforts in helping ANFREL to prepare its mission in Jakarta and in the provinces. ANFREL also very grateful to gain valuable experiences in working closely with the Center for Election Reform (CETRO) and The Indonesian Network of Election Observers (JPPR). ANFREL also wishes to record its profound gratitude to Mr. Tim Meisburger from The Asia Foundation Indonesia (TAF), Mr. Indraneel Datta from IDEA for the training sessions held for ANFREL observers and to the UNDP for its comprehensive election observation manuals. 3 Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL) INDONESIAN MISSION 2004 Special thanks to Ms. Maiko Shimizu from INTERBAND and Mr. Herizal Hazri from ANFREL for their kind efforts in writing and editing this report. And finally, great thank to Gen. Saiyud Kerdphol and all members from Forum Asia for the great moral support and resources lend to ANFREL secretariat team. 4 Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL) INDONESIAN MISSION 2004 INDONESIA MAP http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/ 5 Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL) INDONESIAN MISSION 2004 Indonesian Legislative and Presidential Election 2004 (First Round) ANFREL Observation Mission Report Table of Contents Acronyms ............................................................................................... 8 Preface ................................................................................................. 10 1.ANFREL AND ITS MISSION TO INDONESIA IN 2004................. 10 1.1. 2004 General Election ............................................................... …22 HUMAN RIGHTS CONDITION ........................................................ 38 1.2. Election Day ................................................................................ 44 1.3. Recomendations .......................................................................... 47 APPENDIX TO THE LEGISLATIVE ELECTION 2004 REPORT………………..59 2. Path To The First Direct Presidential Election................................. 67 2.1 .Presidential Elections before 2004................................................. 67 2.2 .Amendments to the 1945 Constitution ........................................ 699 3.Election System................................................................................. 70 3.1. Candidacy of the President and the Vice President....................... 70 3.2 Campaign and Campaign Fund .................................................. 755 3.3 Election Administration .............................................................. 766 4. ANFREL mission ............................................................................. 77 4.1 Objectives....................................................................................... 77 4.2 Observation Framework ................................................................ 79 5. Observation and Findings............................................................... 82 5.1 Characteristics of Observation Areas............................................. 82 5.2 During Campaign Period and Quiet Period................................... 85 6 Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL) INDONESIAN MISSION 2004 5.3 Polling Day and Counting ............................................................ 117 5.4 Election Observation Mission Report on Indonesian presidential election (second round)…………………………………………………129 6.Conclusion and Recommendations ................................................. 142 References .......................................................................................... 151 APPENDIX TO THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 2004 REPORT..... 153 7 Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL) INDONESIAN MISSION 2004 Acronyms Election Administration KPU (Komisi Pemilihan Umum) National Election Commission KPUD (Komisi Pemilihan Umum Daerah) Election Committee at District Level PPK (Petugas Pemungutan di Kecamatan) Polling Station Staff at Kecamatan level PPS (Petugas Pemungutan Suara) Polling Station Staff TPS (Tempat Pemungutan Suara) Polling Station KPPS (Ketua Petugas Pemungutan Suara) Head of Polling Station Staff Panwaslu (Panitia Pengawas Pemilu) Election Supervisory Committee Legislative Organization MPR (Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat) People’s Consultative Assembly DPR (Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat) People’s Representative Council (House of Representatives) DPRD I (Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah Tk. I) Provincial Level Legislature DPRD II (Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah Tk. II) Regency/ City Local Government Legislature DPD (Dewan Perwakilan Daerah) Regional Representative Council Local Administration Propinsi Province 8 Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL) INDONESIAN MISSION 2004 Kabupaten (Kab.) District/ Regency Kotamadya/ Kota Municipality/ City Kecamatan (Kec.) Sub-District in Kabupaten/ Kota Kelurahan (Kel.) Village in Town Area Desa Village RW (Rukun Warga) Neighborhood Group (consisted of RTs) RT (Rukun Tetangga) Neighborhood Group Political Parties Golkar (Partai Golongan Karya) Golkar Party PDI-P (Partai Demokrasi Indonesia Perjuangan) Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle PAN (Partai Amanat Nasional) National Mandate Party PD (Partai Demokrat) Democrat Party PPP (Partai Persatuan Pembangunan) United Development Party PKB (Partai Kebangkitan Bangsa) National Awakening Party 9 Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL) INDONESIAN MISSION 2004 Preface 1. ANFREL AND ITS MISSION TO INDONESIA IN 2004 The Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL) was established in 1997 as Asia’s first regional network of civil society organizations to promote and support democratization at national and regional levels in Asia. ANFREL is a special project under the regional Non- Governmental Organization (NGO) Forum-Asia, and since it was founded, it has served towards strengthening the democratization of countries such as Sri Lanka, Nepal, Thailand, Malaysia, Cambodia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, East Timor and Indonesia. Considering that elections monitoring contributes a great deal of significance in greater democratization efforts, Asian Network for Free Elections-ANFREL was formed in 1997, being a special project under the parent NGO, Forum Asia. Since the formation, all the election- related activities of FORUM-ASIA were turned over and undertaken by ANFREL. Among ANFREL’s network members in Indonesia are the Committee for Independent Election Monitoring in Indonesia (KIPP), AJI and the Legal Aid Foundation (YLBH). From 1997 until today, ANFREL has also been active in contributing other efforts to capacity building of member and non-member organizations on issues related to election observation, voter/civic education, electoral reform and public awareness for good democratic governance. Research activities on electoral reform, democracy and good governance were also conducted jointly with civil society organizations in several countries. 10 Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL) INDONESIAN MISSION 2004 ANFREL’s Involvement in Indonesia ANFREL has also organized a comparative study of election laws in Asia, with specific focus on Indonesian election laws. A seminar- workshop on the election laws in Indonesia was held in November 1998, participated in by election experts from selected Asian countries. The critique and the recommendations of the seminar-workshop were submitted to the Indonesia authorities for consideration in finalizing
Recommended publications
  • Indonesia Beyond Reformasi: Necessity and the “De-Centering” of Democracy
    INDONESIA BEYOND REFORMASI: NECESSITY AND THE “DE-CENTERING” OF DEMOCRACY Leonard C. Sebastian, Jonathan Chen and Adhi Priamarizki* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION: TRANSITIONAL POLITICS IN INDONESIA ......................................... 2 R II. NECESSITY MAKES STRANGE BEDFELLOWS: THE GLOBAL AND DOMESTIC CONTEXT FOR DEMOCRACY IN INDONESIA .................... 7 R III. NECESSITY-BASED REFORMS ................... 12 R A. What Necessity Inevitably Entailed: Changes to Defining Features of the New Order ............. 12 R 1. Military Reform: From Dual Function (Dwifungsi) to NKRI ......................... 13 R 2. Taming Golkar: From Hegemony to Political Party .......................................... 21 R 3. Decentralizing the Executive and Devolution to the Regions................................. 26 R 4. Necessary Changes and Beyond: A Reflection .31 R IV. NON NECESSITY-BASED REFORMS ............. 32 R A. After Necessity: A Political Tug of War........... 32 R 1. The Evolution of Legislative Elections ........ 33 R 2. The Introduction of Direct Presidential Elections ...................................... 44 R a. The 2004 Direct Presidential Elections . 47 R b. The 2009 Direct Presidential Elections . 48 R 3. The Emergence of Direct Local Elections ..... 50 R V. 2014: A WATERSHED ............................... 55 R * Leonard C. Sebastian is Associate Professor and Coordinator, Indonesia Pro- gramme at the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, S. Rajaratnam School of In- ternational Studies, Nanyang Technological University,
    [Show full text]
  • Strategi Media Relations Tim Sukses Calon Presiden-Wakil Presiden Melalui Media Surat Kabar Daerah
    STRATEGI MEDIA RELATIONS TIM SUKSES CALON PRESIDEN-WAKIL PRESIDEN MELALUI MEDIA SURAT KABAR DAERAH Oleh Tatik Yuniarti Dosen Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi Fakultas Komunikasi, Sastra dan Bahasa Universitas Islam “45” Bekasi Abstract In political developments, the press is often a tool used by political elites for their sake of party and political propaganda. This is because the mass media has the power to influence society in a choice pair of presidential and vice presidential candidate. The aim of this research is to find out how the winning strategies used by success team of presidential and vice presidential candidate. The research uses content analysis method. From the analysis conducted, it is obtained that the success team of president and vice presidential candidate tend to be not optimally utilize the news media as connective information to the public. That's what ultimately realized by the success team of Wiranto-Salahuddin Wahid and Amin Rais-Siswono Yudo Husodo presidential and vice presidential candidate as one of the factors that affects both of them were lost in the 2004 presidential election. But the mass media control is not necessarily used as a benchmark victory presidential and vice presidential candidate, because the factors that influence the victory of the presidential election must also consider the respective candidates support base. Keywords: presidential elections, media relations, candidate, vice candidate PENDAHULUAN Pemilihan presiden pada tahun 2004 menjadi tonggak baru dalam sejarah politik Indonesia, karena kali pertama rakyat Indonesia memilih secara langsung pasangan calon presiden dan wakil presiden. Sebelumnya, tahun 1999 hak memilih presiden hanya di tangan 700 anggota Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat (MPR), akibatnya seringkali aspirasi mayoritas rakyat direduksi oleh keputusan elite.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Ethnic Chinese Minority in Developntent: the Indonesian Case
    Southeast Asian Studies. Vol. 25, No.3, December 1987 The Role of Ethnic Chinese Minority in Developntent: The Indonesian Case Mely G. TAN* As recent writIngs indicate, the term Introduction more commonly used today is "ethnic Chinese" to refer to the group as a Despite the manifest diversity of the whole, regardless of citizenship, cultural ethnic Chinese in Southeast Asia, there orientation and social identification.2) is still the tendency among scholars The term ethnic or ethnicity, refers to focusing on this group, to treat them a socio-cultural entity. In the case of as a monolithic entity, by referring to the ethnic Chinese, it refers to a group all of them as "Chinese" or "Overseas with cultural elements recognizable as Chinese." Within the countries them­ or attributable to Chinese, while socially, selves, as In Indonesia, for instance, members of this group identify and are this tendency is apparent among the identified by others as constituting a majority population in the use of the distinct group. terms "orang Cina," "orang Tionghoa" The above definition IS III line with or even "hoakiau."D It is our conten­ the use in recent writings on this topic. tion that these terms should only be In the last ten years or so, we note a applied to those who are alien, not of revival of interest In ethnicity and mixed ancestry, and who initially do ethnic groups, due to the realization not plan to stay permanently. We also that the newly-developed as well as the submit that, what terminology and what established countries In Europe and definition is used for this group, has North America are heterogeneous socie­ important implications culturally, so­ ties with problems In the relations cially, psychologically and especially for policy considerations.
    [Show full text]
  • Eksistensi Agama Khonghucu Di Indonesia
    Santi Aprilia dan Murtiningsih : Eksistensi Agama Khonghucu di Indonesia EKSISTENSI AGAMA KHONGHUCU DI INDONESIA Santi Aprilia, MurtiningsihXX Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Pemikiran Islam UIN Raden Fatah Palembang [email protected] Abstrak Artikel ini mendeskripsikan mengenai perkembangan Agama Khonghucu di Indonesia mengalami keterputusan sejak kekuasaan pemerintahan Orde Baru yang tidak mengakui Agama Khonghucu sebagai agama resmi di Indonesia, melainkan hanya sebagai ajaran etika atau bentuk filsafat. Mengenai perkembangan agama konghucu di Indonesia, makalah ini kesimpulan sebagai berikut : Eksistensi Agama Khonghucu di Indonesia sebelum reformasi mengalami keterhambatan dalam perkembangannya bahkan terdapat berbagai bentuk diskriminasi sistematik dari segi hukum dan pelayanan publik yang dilakukan penguasa. Setelah reformasi eksistensi agama ini mulai mendapat pengakuan masa pemerintahan Presiden B.J. Habibie melalui Instruksi Presiden No. 26 Tahun 1998 tentang Penghentian Penggunaan Istilah Pribumi dan Non-Pribumi. Masa Presiden Abdrurrahman Wahid, melalui Keputusan Presiden No. 6 tahun 2000 mengenai Pemulihan Hak Sipil Penganut Agama Khonghucu. Masa Presiden Megawati Soekarnoputri, Imlek dijadikan hari libur nasional. Di bawah kepresidenan Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, menetapkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 55 tahun 2007 tentang Pendidikan Agama dan Pendidikan Keagamaan. Kata Kunci: konghucu, agama, tionghoa A. Pendahuluan Agama Khonghucu merupakan agama yang bukan hanya diperuntukkan untuk orang- orang Tionghoa saja melainkan untuk semua orang yang mau melaksanakan ajaran dan isi kitab suci agama tersebut. Perkembangan Agama Khonghucu di Indonesia mengalami keterputusan sejak kekuasaan pemerintahan Orde Baru yang tidak mengakui Agama Khonghucu sebagai agama resmi di Indonesia, melainkan hanya sebagai ajaran etika atau bentuk filsafat. Di Indonesia pengajaran Khong Fu Tze atau Kung Tze tidak dipandang sebagai agama oleh orang-orang Tionghoa. Ahli Filsafat itu umumnya hanya dihargai sebagai seorang guru besar.
    [Show full text]
  • Empowering the Presidency: Interests and Perceptions in Indonesia’S Constitutional Reforms, 1999-2002
    EMPOWERING THE PRESIDENCY: INTERESTS AND PERCEPTIONS IN INDONESIA’S CONSTITUTIONAL REFORMS, 1999-2002 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Blair Andrew King, B.A., M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2004 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor R. William Liddle, Adviser Professor Richard Gunther ____________________________ Adviser Professor Timothy Frye Political Science Graduate Program ABSTRACT The choice of political institutions is a critical aspect of a democratic transition. Significant amendments to the 1945 Constitution have transformed it into a more democratic framework with extensive separation of powers and checks and balances. Despite the introduction of the “difficult combination” of pure presidentialism and multipartism to Indonesia, consensual patterns of elite behavior should contribute to the further consolidation of democracy. This study examines the impact of the first four amendments on executive- legislative relations and presidential power. The use of the 1945 Constitution by two authoritarian regimes for four decades gave rise to the perception that it inevitably created a dominant presidency. Thus Indonesian political elites set out in 1999 to curtail presidential power. Paradoxically, by the end of the process three years later they created a comparatively very powerful president, primarily due to the introduction of direct election and the narrowing of the grounds for impeachment. In addition, although the president’s residual powers have been restricted, only slight reductions were made in her specific powers. This study utilizes concepts from political economy and political psychology to analyze the struggle between two broad camps in the constituent assembly (MPR): conservatives, led by Megawati Soekarnoputri and her Indonesian Democracy ii Party-Struggle (PDI-P) and progressives from most of the other major political parties.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Politicians on Television Content in Post
    Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Volume 20, Issue 3, March 2017 Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Volume 20, Issue 3, March 2017 (204-220) ISSN 1410-4946 (Print), 2502-7883 (Online) The Infl uence of Politicians on Television Content in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia Morissan• Abstract The downfall of the last authoritarian ruler in May 1998 marked the beginning of the transition to democracy in Indonesia. Before 1998, the autocratic government fi rmly monitored media content for decades. With the current broadcast liberalization, Indonesian televisions can produce almost any kind of program contents. However, a question arises, who actually controls television content in the era of liberalization? How do political and economic factors infl uence television workers in shaping content? This empirical research intends to focus on the infl uence politicians have on television program content in four elections in post-authoritarian Indonesia. The research question is: how do politicians infl uence television workers in shaping their content? The question needs a qualitative descriptive answer from various sources, including interviews with around 100 television workers in the 10 largest TV stations, participant observations, documents, television reports, and other data sources. Research fi ndings reveal that the relationship between politicians and television intensifi ed ahead and during political campaigns. Most television stations had conducted a relatively fair and nonpartisan coverage of the 2004 and 2009 election, but unfair and partisan in the 1999 and 2014 elections. Keywords: politicians; television; elections; post-authoritarian; Indonesia. Abstrak Terjatuhnya rezim otoriter pada bulan Mei 1998 menandai dimulainya transisi menuju demokrasi di Indonesia. Sebelum tahun 1998, pemerintah otokratis memonitor konten media selama beberapa dekade.
    [Show full text]
  • ILSP Islam and Democracy in Indonesia: Observations on the 2004 General and Presidential Elections by Mitsuo Nakamura
    ILSP Islamic Legal Studies Program Harvard Law School Islam and Democracy in Indonesia: Observations on the 2004 General and Presidential Elections by Mitsuo Nakamura Occasional Publications 6 December 5 ©5 by the Presdent and Fellows of Harvard College All rghts reserved Prnted n the Unted States of Amerca ISBN --59- The Islamic Legal Studies Program s dedcated to achevng excellence n the study of Islamc law through objectve and comparatve methods. It seeks to foster an atmosphere of open nqury whch em- braces many perspectves, both Muslm and non-Mus- lm, and to promote a deep apprecaton of Islamc law as one of the world’s major legal systems. The man focus of work at the Program s on Islamc law n the contemporary world. Ths focus accommodates the many nterests and dscplnes that contrbute to the study of Islamc law, ncludng the study of ts wrt- ngs and hstory. Frank Vogel Director Per Bearman Associate Director Islamc Legal Studes Program Harvard Law School Cambrdge, MA , USA Tel: -9-9 Fax: -9- E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/lsp Table of Contents Preface v Text, by Mitsuo Nakamura Appendx 34 Endnotes v Preface The Islamc Legal Studes Program at Harvard Law School was prvleged to host dstngushed Indone- sansts Prof. emeritus Mtsuo Nakamura and hs wfe Vstng Scholar Prof. Hsako Nakamura from Aprl 2004–Aprl 2005. An rony of the field of Islamc Stud- es s that the most populous Muslm country, whch s also one of the most dverse and open to accom- modaton of other cultures, s often neglected by the manstream of scholars.
    [Show full text]
  • Edisi 102 TH. XLIII, 2013 PENGAWAS UMUM: Pimpinan DPR-RI
    Edisi 102 TH. XLIII, 2013 PENGAWAS UMUM: Pimpinan DPR-RI PENANGGUNG JAWAB/ KETUA PENGARAH: Dr. Winantuningtyastiti, M. Si (Sekretaris Jenderal DPR-RI) WAKIL KETUA PENGARAH: Achmad Djuned SH, M.Hum (Wakil Sekretaris Jenderal DPR-RI) PIMPINAN PELAKSANA: Drs. Djaka Dwi Winarko, M. Si. PIMPINAN REDAKSI: Dadang Prayitna, S.IP. M.H. (Kabag Pemberitaan) WK. PIMPINAN REDAKSI: Dra. Tri Hastuti (Kasubag Penerbitan), Mediantoro, SE (Kasubag Pemberitaan) REDAKTUR: Sugeng Irianto, S.Sos M. Ibnur Khalid Iwan Armanias ANGGOTA REDAKSI: Nita Juwita, S.Sos Supriyanto Suciati, S.Sos Agung Sulistiono, SH PENANGGUNGJAWAB FOTO: Eka Hindra FOTOGRAFER: Rizka Arinindya SEKRETARIAT REDAKSI: I Ketut Sumerta, S. IP Jainuri A. Imam S, S. A. P. SIRKULASI: Abdul Kodir, SH ALAMAT REDAKSI/TATA USAHA: BAGIAN PEMBERITAAN DPR-RI, Lt.II Gedung Nusantara III DPR RI, Jl. Jend. Gatot Soebroto-Senayan, Jakarta Telp. (021) 5715348,5715586, 5715350 Fax. (021) 5715341, e-mail: [email protected]; www.dpr.go.id/berita 2 PARLEMENTARIA EDISI 102 TH. XLIII, 2013 PENGANTAR REDAKSI Tanggal 2 Mei sejatinya adalah hari yang ada di UU Sistem Pendidik an Na­ kelahiran Ki Hadjar Dewantara, beliau lah sional itu kurang memberikan tekanan pahlawan yang memajukan pendidik an kepada aspek pendidikan karakter. di Indonesia. Pemerintah akhirnya me­ netapkan tanggal tersebut sebagai Hari Tokoh pendidikan Prof. HAR Tilaar Pendidikan Nasional. Parlementa ria mengatakan, kita harus kembali kepa­ edisi 102 mengambil momen hardiknas da jiwa atau ruh UUD 1945. “Jangan dengan laporan utama masalah pen­ terombang­ambing dengan paham liber­ didikan nasional dengan harapan, bisa alisme sebab kita bisa dihanyutkan oleh menjadi momentum untuk melihat pen­ arus perubahan global dan jangan lupa, didikan yang kita selenggarakan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Carter Center 2004 Indonesia Election Report
    SPECIAL REPORT SERIES The Carter Center 2004 Indonesia Election Report Waging Peace. Fighting Disease. Building Hope. THE CARTER CENTER STRIVES TO RELIEVE SUFFERING BY ADVANCING PEACE AND HEALTH WORLDWIDE; IT SEEKS TO PREVENT AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS, ENHANCE FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY, AND PROTECT AND PROMOTE HUMAN RIGHTS WORLDWIDE. THE CARTER CENTER 2004 INDONESIA ELECTION REPORT ONE COPENHILL 453 FREEDOM PARKWAY ATLANTA, GA 30307 404-420-5188 FAX 404-420-5196 WWW.CARTERCENTER.ORG JUNE 2005 THE CARTER CENTER THE CARTER CENTER 2004 INDONESIA ELECTION REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Carter Center Election Observation Delegations and Staff . .3 Terms and Abbreviations . .8 Foreword by Jimmy Carter . .10 Acknowledgments . .12 Executive Summary . .13 Background to the 2004 Indonesian Elections . .18 Carter Center Election Observation Program . .23 General Election Issues: Carter Center Observations . .27 Legislative Elections: April 5, 2004 . .47 First-round Presidential Election: July 5, 2004 . .50 Coalition-building for the Second Round . .59 Second-round Presidential Election: Sept. 20, 2004 . .61 The New Governing Coalition . .67 Regional Issues and Special Circumstances . .69 Conclusions and Recommendations . .75 Appendices . .79 The Carter Center at a Glance . .97 2 THE CARTER CENTER THE CARTER CENTER 2004 INDONESIA ELECTION REPORT CARTER CENTER ELECTION OBSERVATION DELEGATIONS AND STAFF JULY 5, 2004 DELEGATION LEADERSHIP Jimmy Carter, Former President of the United States of America Rosalynn Carter, Former First Lady of the United States of America Chuan Leekpai, Former Prime Minister of Thailand DELEGATION Amb. (ret.) Robert Barry (United States), Former U.S. Ambassador to Indonesia and Consultant on Election Issues Mr. Shane Barter (Canada), Long-term Observer, The Carter Center Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Identity and Election in Indonesian Democracy: a Case Study in Karang Pandan Village – Malang, Indonesia
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Environmental Sciences 20 ( 2014 ) 477 – 485 4th International Conference on Sustainable Future for Human Security, SustaiN 2013 Political Identity and Election in Indonesian Democracy: A Case Study in Karang Pandan Village – Malang, Indonesia A.B. Barrul Fuad* Faculty of Administrative Science, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia Abstract Political change in Indonesia which began since 1998 has given a way for an open politics. Using ethnography, this research reveals that although PDIP won parliamentary election in the presidential and district leader (bupati) elections, some of its supporters did not vote for the party’s candidates. In the executive elections, their perception is different. Choosing a president or a bupati is not only perceived as a matter of political or economic calculations but also, and more likely, perceived as cultural events. Under such a circumstance, therefore, ethical values such as politeness of the candidate become the voter’s main consideration to vote. © 20132014 The Authors.Authors. PublishedPublished byby ElsevierElsevier B.V.B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license Selection(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ and peer-review under responsibility of the). SustaiN conference committee and supported by Kyoto University; (RISH), (OPIR),Selection (GCOE and peer-review-ARS) and under(GSS) responsibility as co-hosts. of the SustaiN conference committee and supported by Kyoto University; (RISH), (OPIR), (GCOE-ARS) and (GSS) as co-hosts Keywords: Election; Political party; Political identity; Indonesia 1. Introduction The political history of Indonesia can be divided into four periods that is liberal or constitutional democracy (1949-1958), guided democracy (1959-1965), Pancasila (New Order 1966- May 2, 1998) and Reformation (post- reign of Soeharto, May 1998 – now).
    [Show full text]
  • Results from Wave Xv of Tracking Surveys
    RESULTS FROM WAVE XV OF TRACKING SURVEYS 4 August 2004 Methodology • This survey was conducted between 7 July and 14 July 2004, using face to face interviews with 1250 respondents in all 32 provinces. • Respondents were selected using multi stage random sampling of eligible voters. The composition of the respondents reflects the rural/urban, men/women and inter-provincial proportions of the Indonesian population • The margin of error for the national data is +/-2.8% at a 95% level of confidence • Data comparisons in the text relate to earlier IFES tracking surveys – Wave I: 13-18 December 2003; 1250 respondents; +/-2.8% margin of error at 95% confidence level – Wave II: 12-15 January 2004; 1250 respondents; +/-2.8% margin of error at 95% confidence level – Wave III/IV: 26 January – 6 February 2004; 2000 respondents; +/- 2.2% margin of error at 95% confidence level – Wave V/VIII: 15 February – 10 March 2004; 4000 respondents; +/-1.55% margin of error at 95% confidence level – Wave IX: 21-28 March 2004; 1250 respondents; +/-2.8% margin of error at 95% confidence level – Wave X: 7-14 April 2004; 1250 respondents; +/2.8% margin of error at 95% confidence level – Wave XI/XII: 20 April to 8 May 2004; 2000 respondents; +/-2.2% margin of error at 95% confidence level – Wave XIII: 14 – 9 June 2004; 1250 respondents; +/-2.8% margin of error at 95% confidence level – Wave XIV: 17 – 26 June 2004; 2000 respondents; +/- 2.2% margin of error at 95% confidence level • In this report, any data from the Wave I, Wave II, Waves III/IV, Waves V through VIII surveys, Wave IX, Wave X, Waves XI/XII, Wave XIII and Wave XIV is specifically cited in the charts and text.
    [Show full text]
  • Peserta Pemilu
    3 PESERTA PEMILIHAN UMUM REPUBLIK INDONESIA PESERTA PEMILIHAN UMUM REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 1955 PEMILU ANGGOTA DPR, DPD dan DPRD Peserta: Pemilu Anggota DPR 36 Partai Politik Pelaksanaan: 34 Ormas 29 September 1955 Partai Pemenang: 48 Perorangan 1. PNI Pemilu Anggota Peserta: 2. MASYUMI Konstituante 39 Partai Politik 3. NU Pelaksanaan: 23 Ormas 25 Desember 1955 29 Perorangan PEMILU PRESIDEN DAN WAKIL PRESIDEN Tidak ada Pemilu Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Soekarno dan Mohammad Hatta ditetapkan sebagai Presiden dan Wakil Presiden RI pertama oleh Panitia Persiapan Kemerdekaan Indonesia (PPKI) TAHUN 1971 PEMILU ANGGOTA DPR, DPD dan DPRD Partai Pemenang: Pelaksanaan: Peserta: 1. GOLKAR 29 September 1955 10 Partai Politik 2. NU 3. PNI PEMILU PRESIDEN DAN WAKIL PRESIDEN Tidak ada Pemilu Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Soeharto dan Sri Sultan Hamengkubuwono IX ditetapkan sebagai Presiden dan Wakil Presiden oleh MPR RI 7 Peserta Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia TAHUN 1977- 1997 PEMILU ANGGOTA DPR, DPD dan DPRD Pelaksanaan: 1977: 2 Mei 1977 Partai Pemenang: 1982: 4 Mei 1982 Peserta: 1. GOLKAR 1987: 23 April 1987 3 Partai Politik 2. PPP 1992: 9 Juni 1992 3. PDI 1997: 29 Mei 1997 PEMILU PRESIDEN DAN WAKIL PRESIDEN Tidak ada Pemilu Presiden dan Wakil Presiden - Tahun 1977: Soeharto dan Adam Malik - Tahun 1982: Soeharto dan Umar Wirahadikusumah - Tahun 1987: Soeharto dan Soedharmono - Tahun 1992: Soeharto dan Try Sutrisno - Tahun 1997: Soeharto dan BJ. Habibie TAHUN 1999 PEMILU ANGGOTA DPR, DPD dan DPRD Partai Pemenang: Pelaksanaan: Peserta: 1. PDI Perjuangan 7 Juni 1999 48 Partai Politik 2. GOLKAR 3. PPP PEMILU PRESIDEN DAN WAKIL PRESIDEN Tidak ada Pemilu Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Presiden dan Wakil Presiden diangkat dan ditetapkan oleh MPR RI Presiden dan Wakil Presiden terpilih: Abdurrahman Wahid dan Megawati Soekarnoputri Peserta Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia 8 TAHUN 2004 PEMILU ANGGOTA DPR, DPD dan DPRD Partai Pemenang: Pelaksanaan: Peserta: 1.
    [Show full text]